Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0698
D

Failure to Consistently Assess AVF Shunt for Dialysis Resident

Denver, Colorado Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $36,86012 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident requiring dialysis care received services consistent with professional standards of practice, specifically regarding the assessment of the resident's arteriovenous fistula (AVF) shunt. The facility's policy required daily assessment of the AVF, including checking for color, temperature, radial pulse, and patency by palpating for a thrill or auscultating for a bruit, with documentation every shift. However, review of the resident's electronic medical record, medication administration record, and treatment administration record revealed no documentation that the AVF was assessed for patency, thrill, or bruit from the time of readmission. There was also no physician's order in place to monitor the shunt for patency, and the care plan intervention to check the shunt twice daily was not consistently followed. The resident in question had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal failure, requiring hemodialysis three times a week. Staff interviews confirmed that the AVF was not assessed as required, and the necessary physician's order was missing following the resident's readmission. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment also failed to indicate that the resident was receiving hemodialysis, despite this being the case. Documentation showed that the AVF was only checked on a few isolated dates, rather than consistently twice daily as required by the care plan and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙