Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Dialysis Resident

Madera, California Survey Completed on 04-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident undergoing dialysis, identified as Resident #7. The facility's policy required EBPs for residents with indwelling medical devices, such as an arteriovenous fistula, to prevent the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms. Despite this requirement, Resident #7, who had a fistula and was receiving hemodialysis, was not placed on EBP. Observations and interviews revealed that staff did not wear gowns when checking the resident's dialysis access site, and there were no EBP postings outside the resident's room. Interviews with facility staff, including a Licensed Vocational Nurse, the Unit Manager, the Infection Preventionist, the Director of Nursing, and the Executive Director, confirmed that Resident #7 met the criteria for EBP but was not included in the program. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged the oversight, and the Director of Nursing stated that the facility's expectation was for the Infection Preventionist to recognize and implement EBP immediately when required. The Executive Director also confirmed that the resident should have been on EBP to ensure safety protocols were followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙