Inadequate Dining Facilities for Residents
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequately furnished and spacious dining rooms for resident dining and activities on Units 100 and 400. Observations revealed that the dining rooms on these units did not accommodate the social and physical needs of the residents. On Unit 100, the dining area had six square tables, with some tables pushed together, and residents were observed sitting in wheelchairs, reclining chairs, or with assistive devices, leaving no room for ambulatory residents. Many residents were lined up in the hallway during meals, seated with bedside tables, and appeared cramped, with no music or conversation to enhance the dining experience. On Unit 400, there was no designated dining area, and residents were observed eating in the hallway or in their rooms. Interviews with staff revealed that the main dining room had been closed for several months due to staffing issues and had not been used for two years. The CNA stated that residents requiring supervision were lined up in the hallway, while the LPN Supervisor suggested that opening the main dining room could reduce congestion. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the main dining room had been closed since the COVID-19 outbreak and recognized that dining in the hallway was not a dignified experience for residents. The lack of adequate dining facilities led to residents being lined up in hallways, which did not provide a comfortable or social dining environment.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Insufficient Dining Room Seating: The Station One dining area did not have enough standard-height chairs for all residents who wanted to dine there. During meal service, residents were observed eating while standing, using wheeled walker seats as tables, sitting on the floor, or taking trays back to their rooms because no chairs were available. Residents and an LPN reported the dining area was often too full, and the Administrator stated there should be enough chairs for all residents who wanted to sit in the dining room.
Insufficient dining space left residents who required feeding assistance waiting in the adjoining TV activity area while others ate. Staff reported that the feeding table could not seat all 16 residents needing help at once, so residents were rotated in as seats became available. Observations showed a large round table and a small square table with no room for additional seating or extra tables, and residents were seen waiting there on multiple occasions.
A resident was served lunch in the 4th floor dining room but had to carry the tray around while looking for a seat because no chairs were available. The resident stood while holding the meal and ate part of the sandwich before staff provided a chair. The Maintenance Director stated the facility had enough chairs and that extra chairs would be brought to the floor if needed.
The facility did not serve meals at the posted times, with lunch, breakfast, and dinner consistently delayed. A resident reported that meals often arrived late, and a CNA confirmed that residents were upset by the unpredictability. Observations showed lunch trays were served in the dining room and delivered to resident rooms well after the scheduled time, and the Dietary Manager stated that meal plating began at the posted time, causing further delays.
The facility did not provide access to a dining room for residents on weekends, as observed during a survey. On one observed day, the dining area was not set up for resident use, and staff confirmed that the dining room had been closed on weekends for an extended period due to staffing shortages. A resident expressed a preference for dining in the dining room, citing more menu options. The dining room was available and in use on weekdays, but not on weekends.
The facility failed to provide adequate dining space for dependent residents in the Blue Unit, leading to congestion and restricted movement during meals. Observations revealed that the dining room was overcrowded with residents in wheelchairs and Geri reclining chairs, making it difficult for staff to assist residents effectively. The DON acknowledged the issue, citing staffing constraints as a reason for the limited seating arrangement.
Insufficient Dining Room Seating
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient seating in the Station One dining area to accommodate all residents for dining. Fifty-eight residents from the 100, 200, and 300 halls shared the dining area, but observation showed only 12 standard-height dining chairs, 10 tall chairs along the back wall with no tables in front of them, and 3 tall chairs placed between shorter tables where the chairs were higher than the tables. During lunch service, residents were observed eating in ways that reflected the lack of available seating, including one resident using a wheeled walker seat as a tray table, another eating while standing at the counter, and another standing at a table before taking the tray back to the room. One resident entered looking for a chair, found none, and left saying there was no place to sit. Additional observations showed the same pattern on later dates, including residents using walker seats as tables, multiple residents taking trays to their rooms to eat, one resident sitting on the floor while eating, and another eating while standing. At one meal, all standard dining chairs were occupied and a resident and visitor stood because no open chairs were available. Residents interviewed said there were not enough chairs to sit at the dining room tables and that they often ate in their rooms or had to leave the dining room because seating was unavailable. An LPN said the dining room got full at meal service time, and the Administrator stated there should be enough chairs for all residents who wanted to sit in the dining room.
Insufficient Dining Space for Residents Requiring Feeding Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure there was sufficient space in the dining room to accommodate residents who required assistance with feeding. During observations on 03/09/2026, Resident #3 and Resident #35 were seen sitting in the adjoining TV activity section of the dining room while other residents were eating lunch. A CNA told S10TN that these residents were waiting to eat at the feeding table because space was not available. Later that morning, Resident #3 and Resident #35 were moved to the feeding table when space became available. On 03/10/2026, Resident #35 was again observed waiting in the adjoining TV activity section of the dining room to eat because there were no available seats at the feeding table. S10TN stated the facility did not have enough space to seat all residents who required feeding at once, so staff rotated residents out of the table as others finished eating. An observation of the feeding area showed a large round table and a small square table with no space for additional residents, staff, or extra tables. On 03/11/2026, Resident #121 was also observed waiting in the TV activity section to eat. S1DON stated there were 16 residents who had to be fed and it was not feasible for all of them to sit at the table at one time, so CNAs brought all of the residents needing feeding to the dining room and seated them in the TV activity section while waiting for space at the feeding table.
Insufficient Seating in Dining Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate seating was available for a resident in the 4th floor dining room. On 1/5/26 at approximately 1:25 PM, the resident was served lunch on a tray at the steam table and carried the tray through the dining room looking for a seat, but no chairs were available. The resident stood in the dining room while holding the meal and ate half of a grilled cheese sandwich before staff provided a chair. On 1/7/26, the Maintenance Director stated that the facility had enough chairs in each dining room and said extra chairs would be brought to the floor if needed. The facility policy on the order of meals served states that dining rooms with open dining will serve the resident in a timely manner after being seated.
Failure to Serve Meals at Posted Times Disrupts Resident Dining Experience
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve meals to residents at the posted serving times for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Observations and interviews revealed that lunch, which was scheduled for 12:30 pm, was consistently served late, with the first tray being served in the dining room at 12:51 pm and the last at 1:11 pm on one day, and similar delays observed on the following day. Trays delivered to resident rooms in the north and south halls were also delayed, with the first trays not arriving until well after the posted lunch time. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the kitchen begins plating food at the posted time rather than having meals ready to serve, resulting in further delays. Residents and staff reported ongoing issues with meal timeliness. One resident stated that all meals, including breakfast and dinner, are always late, sometimes with breakfast arriving as late as 9:00 am and lunch and dinner being served significantly after the scheduled times. A CNA confirmed that residents become upset due to the unpredictability of meal delivery. These consistent delays in meal service disrupted the residents' dining experience as meals were not provided at the times posted by the facility.
Dining Room Not Available for Resident Use on Weekends
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a designated dining room for residents to dine in on at least one of the four days observed. During a tour of the dining area on a Sunday, the room was found to be clean but had dim lighting and was not set up to accommodate residents for lunch. No residents were observed eating in the dining room during this time. Staff interviews confirmed that the dining room was not open on weekends due to staffing shortages, and this practice had been ongoing for an extended period. The Certified Dietary Manager stated that they were waiting for increased weekend staffing, and a Dietician Tech confirmed that the dining room had not been open on weekends since at least June 2022. Resident interviews indicated a preference for dining in the dining room, with one resident noting more menu options available there compared to eating in their room. On a weekday, the dining area was observed in use by about 15 residents, with dietary staff present and assisting. The Administrator acknowledged that the dining room closure on weekends was initially due to CDC COVID guidelines, but these guidelines had changed three months prior to the survey. Despite this, the dining room remained closed on weekends, and the facility was in the process of planning for its reopening.
Inadequate Dining Space for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate dining space for dependent residents requiring staff assistance during meals in the Blue Unit. Observations on March 18 and March 19, 2025, revealed that the dining room was congested with residents in wheelchairs and Geri reclining chairs, making it difficult for staff to pass through, set up meal trays, and assist residents effectively. The limited space also restricted residents' ability to maneuver safely within the room. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the clinical nurse consultant, it was acknowledged that the dining area was a tight fit during meals. The DON stated that due to staffing constraints, there was only one seating for each meal in the dependent resident dining rooms. This setup compromised the ability of staff to efficiently assist residents with meals and restricted residents' movement, creating an environment that did not support a dignified and comfortable dining experience.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.