Incomplete discharge documentation for a resident: The facility failed to accurately and completely document where a resident was discharged, including missing Resident/Representative Acknowledgement information and unclear identification of the discharge destination. A social worker note stated the resident wanted to go home to an address not listed on the admission record and that his brother would pick him up, while staff interviews showed uncertainty about which brother transported him and the DON stated the discharge location should have been documented.
Failure to notify the physician and family of changes in condition occurred for one resident with repeated hypoglycemia and three residents with skin tears or wounds. An LPN did not notify the provider about low blood sugar readings requiring treatment, and staff could not find documentation of skin tear or wound assessments, provider notification, or resident representative notification for the other residents. Facility policy required notification when a resident had a skin tear or a change requiring new treatment.
A resident developed worsening symptoms including chest pain radiating to the back, sweating, clamminess, pallor, vomiting, and repeated requests to go to the hospital. Staff repeatedly raised concerns to the APRN and DON, but the physician and family were not notified of the significant change in condition, and no change-of-condition process was completed.
Failure to Notify Representatives of Significant Weight Loss and New Wound: The facility did not notify a resident’s representative about significant wt loss after weekly weights showed a marked decline, and the RD acknowledged the son was not informed about the loss or dietary changes. The facility also did not document notifying another resident’s representative when a new chin wound from collar pressure was found; the LPN recalled seeing the wound and placing a wound care consult, but was unsure whether the family was called.
A resident with vascular dementia and severe cognitive impairment, admitted for a short hospice respite stay, was discharged from the facility by his daughter without documented verification of her authority or notification and agreement from his listed emergency contact, his spouse. Staff, including an LPN and an RN, relied on the daughter’s statements that the resident’s wife wanted him home and did not independently contact the spouse, and facility records lacked documentation of any attempt to notify the responsible party or confirm consent before the resident left.
Failure to notify the physician and family of a resident’s skin change. Weekly skin assessments documented bilateral lower arm bruising/discoloration, but progress notes did not show notification to the MD, family, or administration. Staff later stated the resident had chronic itchy skin and rubbed his arms on the bed rail, but the behavior was not found in the care plan documentation.
Two residents experienced significant changes in condition without timely notification to their representatives and, in one case, the physician. One cognitively impaired resident with multiple serious diagnoses suffered a cardiac arrest; staff initiated CPR, called 911, and transferred her to the hospital, but documentation showed only the resident herself was listed as notified, and her healthcare proxy later reported she was never contacted by the facility and learned of the event from the hospital. Another cognitively intact respite resident developed skin tears to the arm and leg, reportedly related to an outing incident, which were documented on CNA task lists but not reflected in nursing progress notes or the discharge summary; his daughter discovered a bandage at pickup and stated she was never informed of the incident or injuries despite attempts to reach facility leadership. The DON acknowledged that a change in condition should have been documented and that the nurse, MD, and family should have been notified, contrary to the facility’s own change-in-condition policy.
Surveyors found that staff failed to notify representatives for two residents who experienced significant changes in condition and were transferred to the hospital, despite a policy requiring such notification unless the resident specifically declines it. Record reviews showed documentation only that the residents themselves were notified, with no record of representative contact or refusal of notification. One family member reported not being informed of lab results, tests, changes in condition, or the hospitalization, learning of the situation only from the hospital after the resident was in the ICU. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about who is responsible for notifying representatives, and leadership reported they were not aware that policy required representative notification for changes in status and hospital transfers.
The facility failed to notify representatives and physicians of significant weight loss in two residents, despite a policy requiring prompt communication of changes in condition and completion of an SBER change-in-condition evaluation. One resident with multiple chronic conditions, including dementia and diabetes, experienced more than a 12% weight loss over several months without documented notification to the representative or physician, and the representative reported not being informed of the weight loss or related interventions. Another resident with extensive cardiovascular, neurologic, and psychiatric diagnoses, including CHF, vascular dementia, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition, also lost more than 12% of body weight over six months, with no documented family or physician notification. An LPN acknowledged that the physician and representative had not been contacted, the RD stated that notification was a nursing responsibility, and the DON confirmed the absence of documentation of required notifications.
Failure to Notify POA of Significant Weight Loss: A resident with quadriplegia, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, and PEG tube feeding experienced significant weight loss, dropping from 195 lbs. to 176 lbs. over a short period. Facility records noted the weight loss during IDT and dietary review, but the POA stated she was not aware of it and had not been contacted by the RD or facility staff, despite staff confirming the POA should have been notified of the change in condition.
Self-audit
Pick a level of detail and, optionally, what to focus on — then generate a survey-ready checklist distilled from the most recent citations.
Beta · AI-generated — for reference only, not professional advice. Verify against current CMS guidance before relying on it. Assisto accepts no responsibility for how this checklist is used.
Citations used to create this checklist
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.