Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Cortland Acres Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A deficiency occurred when a lunch tray on A Hall was found to be served below required hot-holding temperature standards. During a survey, a random tray containing mashed potatoes and gravy with steak was tested by the Traveling Dietary Manager in the presence of the Administrator, and both food items measured 110°F, which did not meet required serving temperatures. The Traveling Dietary Manager and the Administrator each confirmed that the food temperature was not at the required level, and the administrative team later acknowledged this deficiency.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to provide residents with consistent and accurate readily available menus reflecting their food preferences. The Traveling Dietary Manager reported that residents could choose from multiple egg preparations, but these options were not listed on the posted menu available to residents. Additionally, the “always available” menu used in the kitchen did not match the menu provided to residents, and this discrepancy was confirmed by the Traveling Dietary Manager. The issue was identified on all menus reviewed and had the potential to affect many residents in the facility.
The facility did not serve meals at scheduled times or in accordance with residents' preferences, resulting in delayed and sometimes cold meals. Observations and resident interviews confirmed that meal delivery was inconsistent and often late, with food temperatures recorded on the last tray served.
A nurse aide failed to change contaminated gloves after performing perineal care and before assisting a resident with a clean gown and linens. The aide used the same gloves that had been in contact with the perineal area to handle clean items, which was observed and stopped by a surveyor.
Multiple residents with physician-ordered texture-modified diets, such as minced and moist, soft and bite-sized, chopped, mechanical soft, or pureed, were served meals that did not match their prescribed food consistency. Dietary staff and management demonstrated confusion about diet terminology and preparation, resulting in residents with swallowing difficulties receiving food in forms that posed a risk of choking and aspiration.
A resident with a physician order for full code status was found unresponsive, pulseless, and not breathing, but staff did not initiate CPR as required. Instead, postmortem care was performed, and code status was only checked after a delay, contrary to facility policy and standard protocol.
Staff did not offer residents a choice regarding the use of clothing protectors, instead placing them without consent. Two residents were served meals in large vegetable serving bowls without documented need for adaptive equipment, and meals were not served simultaneously to residents seated together, contrary to facility policy.
Surveyors observed stained ceilings in several areas, including the main hallway and a soiled utility room. Staff confirmed these findings, and the Interim Administrator acknowledged the issue during the exit interview.
Surveyors found that the facility did not develop or implement individualized, person-centered care plans for several residents, resulting in incomplete or generic care plans that failed to address specific medical, psychosocial, and activity needs. Examples included missing interventions for mobility equipment, lack of detail for pain and wound care, omission of activity preferences, and insufficient planning for residents with mental health diagnoses or communication impairments. Nursing leadership confirmed these deficiencies during interviews.
Multiple residents who required assistance with ADLs did not consistently receive scheduled showers, baths, or grooming due to staffing shortages and incomplete documentation. Residents reported missed or infrequent bathing, and staff confirmed that care was not always provided as scheduled. Care plans indicated a need for dependent assistance, but these needs were not reliably met, and documentation gaps were acknowledged by the DON and other staff.
Rooms containing sharp objects, including an overflowing sharps container and hygiene products with razor blades, were found unlocked and accessible to residents. Staff and the administrator confirmed that these areas were supposed to be secured but were not, due to either oversight or a malfunctioning lock.
The facility did not consistently provide meals that were palatable, attractive, or served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Multiple residents reported cold, bland, or hard food, and direct observations confirmed that some meals were served below recommended temperatures or were unappealing in texture and taste. Dietary staff acknowledged temperature issues during meal service, and repeated complaints were documented over several months.
Surveyors identified expired food in storage, improper food holding temperatures during meal service, and inadequate staff hygiene practices, including a staff member serving food without a hair net and with unclean hair. These actions did not meet professional standards for food safety and hygiene as required by facility policy.
Multiple lapses in infection prevention and control were observed, including a nurse handling medication without gloves, staff failing to wear required PPE during a wound dressing change for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and staff not performing hand hygiene before meals in the dining room. These failures occurred despite clear policies, posted signage, and available PPE.
The facility did not ensure nurse aides completed the required annual training hours, including education on dementia and Alzheimer's care. Documentation was missing for both the training hours and assessment of knowledge, and the absence of a nursing educator contributed to the deficiency.
A resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the correct transfer method, as it listed a Hoyer lift with two staff instead of the actual use of a best care stander (people mover) with one staff. The discrepancy was confirmed by the ADON, who acknowledged the care plan was inaccurate.
Surveyors found that several residents had identical, non-individualized care plans for activities, with generic statements and no tailoring to personal interests or needs. This was confirmed by an interim ADON and had the potential to affect a significant portion of the facility's population.
A resident's PICC line dressing was not changed according to physician orders, with the dressing remaining in place beyond the required seven-day interval. An LPN acknowledged the missed change, initially stating that dressings could not be found, while the ADON confirmed that supplies were available and the change should have been completed as scheduled.
A resident with stage II pressure ulcers did not receive consistent weekly assessments or documentation as required by facility policy. After a transition to a new electronic health record system, dressing change orders were not continued, and subsequent skin assessments failed to note the ongoing wound. The ADON confirmed that required weekly assessments were missed, and the continuity of the pressure ulcer's status could not be determined.
A resident with COPD and chronic respiratory failure was observed using supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula, but staff confirmed there was no physician order for this therapy as required by facility policy.
A resident's medical record contained a physician's order for gabapentin to be given for seizures, despite the absence of a seizure diagnosis. The ADON confirmed the medication was originally prescribed for diabetic neuropathy, and could not explain why the order now referenced seizures.
Improper Hot Food Serving Temperatures During Lunch Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide resident meals at proper serving temperature during a lunch meal service on A Hall. On 03/24/26 at approximately 12:10 PM, a surveyor had a random lunch tray on A Hall temperature-tested by the Traveling Dietary Manager, with the facility Administrator present. The tested items—mashed potatoes and gravy with steak—were both measured at 110°F. During an interview at approximately 12:15 PM, the Traveling Dietary Manager confirmed that the food did not meet the required serving temperature, and at approximately 12:16 PM, the Administrator also confirmed that the food did not meet the required serving temperature. This deficiency was acknowledged by the facility’s administrative team upon survey exit on 03/25/26 at approximately 4:00 PM. No additional resident-specific clinical information or conditions were provided in the report.
Inconsistent Readily Available Menus for Resident Food Preferences
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to provide residents with consistent and accurate information about readily available menu items that accommodate resident preferences. During document review and staff interviews, the Traveling Dietary Manager stated that residents could choose from several egg preparations (omelet, scrambled eggs, hard-boiled egg, or hard-fried egg) as part of the facility’s readily available items. However, the posted readily available menu accessible to residents did not list these egg options. Additionally, the “always available” menu used in the kitchen did not match the menu provided to residents, and the Traveling Dietary Manager confirmed that the readily available menus did not correlate. This inconsistency was found on 2 of 2 menus reviewed and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents in a facility with a census of 90. On a subsequent interview, the facility Administrator acknowledged the deficiency during the exit interview.
Failure to Serve Meals Timely and According to Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that meals were served in a timely manner according to residents' needs, preferences, and the facility's own policy. Observations showed that lunch trays were delivered significantly later than the scheduled time, with one resident in the dining room receiving lunch at 1:10 PM despite the policy stating lunch should be served at 11:30 AM. Staff confirmed that trays should have been delivered by 12:20 PM. Resident interviews revealed that meals were often served late, with breakfast at 9:00 AM, lunch at 1:45 PM, and dinner at 7:20 PM for one resident, and another resident reported that food was cold at all meals. Additional observations of meal service showed varying delivery times across different halls, with the last tray served at 12:45 PM. Food temperatures of the last tray were recorded as Cod 145°F, Potatoes 140°F, and Cream Spinach 160°F. These findings indicate that the facility did not consistently provide meals at scheduled times or in accordance with residents' preferences, resulting in delayed and sometimes cold meals.
Failure to Change Gloves After Perineal Care Before Handling Clean Items
Penalty
Summary
During an observation of perineal care for a resident, a nurse aide completed the perineal care procedure but failed to change contaminated gloves before assisting the resident with a clean gown. The nurse aide used the same gloves that had been in contact with the perineal area to handle clean clothing and linens. This action was witnessed by the surveyor, who intervened to stop the continued use of contaminated gloves. The nurse aide acknowledged that gloves should have been changed after completing perineal care and before touching clean items. The deficiency was identified during a survey in which one resident was observed, and the facility census at the time was 90.
Failure to Provide Food in Prescribed Consistency for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food prepared in the appropriate form to meet the individual dietary needs of multiple residents, as required by their physician-ordered diets. Several residents with orders for specific food textures, such as minced and moist, soft and bite-sized, chopped, mechanical soft, or pureed, were observed receiving meals that did not match their prescribed diet. For example, one resident with a minced and moist meat order was served breaded chicken cut into various-sized pieces, and others with orders for chopped or ground foods received whole hamburgers, unaltered baked beans, and carrot slices. These inconsistencies were observed during meal service in both resident rooms and dining areas. Staff interviews revealed a lack of understanding and awareness among dietary aides and the Certified Dietary Manager regarding the different diet levels and terminology used in the facility. Dietary staff reported they were unfamiliar with terms such as Dysphagia Advanced, Soft and Bite-Sized, and Minced and Moist, and typically relied on their own knowledge or recognition of residents rather than following specific diet orders. The Registered Dietician confirmed that diet textures were often recommended by the Speech-Language Pathologist, but there was confusion about how these recommendations translated to the kitchen's practices. The facility's own documentation showed a variety of diet levels, but the kitchen only recognized a limited set of textures, leading to discrepancies between ordered diets and food preparation. Multiple residents were directly affected by these failures, with some expressing difficulty eating or refusing meals that did not meet their needs. In one instance, a resident and her daughter became upset when she was served a meal inconsistent with her mechanical soft/dysphagia diet and requested a plain hamburger, which was initially provided in the wrong form. The surveyor observed that these failures to provide food in the correct consistency created an immediate jeopardy situation due to the risk of choking and aspiration, as residents with swallowing difficulties were not consistently receiving safe, appropriate meals.
Failure to Initiate CPR for Full Code Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical diagnoses, including diabetes, dementia, seizure disorder, coronary artery disease, and hypertension, was found unresponsive, pulseless, and not breathing. Despite a physician order indicating full code status, staff did not initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) upon discovery of the resident. The resident's skin was noted to be pale and warm to the touch, and there were no obvious signs of irreversible death such as rigor mortis. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Registered Nurse (RN) on duty confirmed the absence of a heart rate and respirations, but instead of starting CPR, postmortem care was performed. The RN later stated that she checked the code status only after being asked, which occurred approximately 12 minutes after the resident was found unresponsive. The code status was verified by retrieving the face sheet from the nurses' station, at which point it was discovered that the resident was a full code. Facility policy required that CPR be initiated for any unresponsive individual unless a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order was known or there were clear signs of irreversible death. Staff interviews revealed that the expected protocol was to start CPR immediately and verify code status using the electronic medical record (EMR), Medication Administration Record (MAR), or Point of Care (POC) record. However, in this incident, the staff failed to follow these procedures, resulting in the resident not receiving CPR as ordered and requested.
Failure to Honor Resident Dignity and Dining Rights
Penalty
Summary
During a dining observation, staff failed to ask residents if they wished to wear clothing protectors, instead placing them on residents without offering a choice. Two residents were served their meals in large vegetable serving bowls, despite no documentation or orders indicating the need for adaptive equipment. Additionally, staff did not serve meals to residents seated at the same table at the same time, contrary to the facility's dining policy, with one resident waiting five minutes before being served until surveyor intervention. These actions and inactions did not honor residents' rights to dignity, self-determination, and a coordinated dining experience.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Homelike Environment Due to Stained Ceilings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by multiple observations of stained ceilings in various areas of the building. Specifically, stained ceilings were noted in the main hallway near the main entrance and in the C Hall soiled utility room during a survey. These findings were confirmed through staff interviews at the time of discovery and were acknowledged by the Interim Administrator during the exit interview. No information was provided regarding the involvement of specific residents or their medical conditions at the time of the deficiency.
Failure to Develop and Implement Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement person-centered, comprehensive care plans for multiple residents, as evidenced by record reviews, staff interviews, and direct observations. Several care plans lacked individualized focus areas and interventions tailored to the residents' specific medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. For example, one resident who used a power wheelchair did not have care plan interventions addressing the use of a best care stander for transfers, and the care plan was not updated to reflect his current needs. Another resident with PTSD and on hospice care had a care plan that did not address medication management for PTSD, failed to identify triggers, and lacked specific hospice-related interventions. Other deficiencies included incomplete or generic care plan entries for residents at risk for falls, those with complex medical conditions such as hemiplegia, dysphagia, and pressure injuries, and those requiring adaptive equipment. In several cases, care plans omitted important details such as specific pain management strategies during wound care, enteral feeding protocols, and the use of adaptive devices. Additionally, residents with communication impairments did not have care plans that addressed their unique communication methods, such as the use of a whiteboard. The report also identified that care plans for several residents were void of person-centered activities, with some entries left blank or lacking any mention of the residents' preferences or interests. For residents with mental health diagnoses and psychoactive medication orders, care plans did not specify the residents' individual signs and symptoms or effective non-pharmacological interventions. These deficiencies were confirmed by interviews with the DON and other nursing leadership, who acknowledged the lack of resident-centered care planning.
Failure to Provide Scheduled ADL Assistance and Hygiene Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including bathing, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene, for multiple residents who were unable to perform these tasks independently. Several residents reported not receiving showers or baths as scheduled, with documentation confirming missed or infrequent bathing over 30-day periods. In some cases, residents received only one or two showers or baths in a month, despite being scheduled for twice-weekly bathing. Documentation was often incomplete or missing, and in at least one instance, the type of bathing provided was not specified. Staff interviews confirmed that showers were not consistently provided due to staffing shortages and issues with documentation in the electronic health record system. Residents affected by these deficiencies included individuals who required assistance with ADLs due to advanced age or chronic health conditions. Care plans for these residents specified the need for dependent assistance with personal hygiene, grooming, and oral care, yet these needs were not consistently met. One resident specifically noted not being shaved, and this was confirmed by both the resident and an LPN. Another resident's care plan indicated a need for assistance with dental care, but there was no evidence that oral hygiene was consistently provided. Staff interviews revealed that nursing assistants were unable to provide scheduled showers due to insufficient staffing, particularly during meal service and therapy times. The Director of Nursing and other staff acknowledged gaps in both the provision and documentation of care, citing staff training on a new documentation system as a contributing factor. Despite claims that some care may have been provided but not documented, no additional records were produced to verify this, and the deficiencies were confirmed by facility leadership.
Unlocked Hazardous Storage Areas with Accessible Sharps
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident environment free from accident hazards by leaving rooms containing sharp objects unlocked and accessible to residents. During observations, a biohazard room labeled for authorized personnel only was found unlocked, and inside, a sharps container overflowing with razor blades was present in a shower area. A staff member confirmed that the door was not kept locked and acknowledged the risk posed by the overflowing sharps container. Additionally, a storage room labeled for nurses and ward clerks only was also found unlocked, containing hygiene products including razor blades. The facility administrator confirmed the room was supposed to be locked but the lock had malfunctioned, leaving potentially hazardous items accessible.
Failure to Provide Palatable and Properly Tempered Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink served to residents was palatable, attractive, and maintained at a safe and appetizing temperature, as required by their own policies. Multiple residents reported ongoing issues with food quality, including meals being served cold, unappetizing, and difficult to eat. Resident council meeting minutes over a six-month period documented repeated complaints about cold food, poor taste, and inadequate portion sizes. During interviews, several residents described the food as cold, bland, hard, or inedible, with some stating they avoided certain meals or requested alternatives due to dissatisfaction. Direct observations during meal service revealed that food items, such as pork chops and hamburgers, were hard, dry, and difficult to chew. Surveyors also noted that food was served on plates with non-insulated lids and without the use of plate warmers, which likely contributed to temperature issues. Temperature checks performed by dietary staff and observed by surveyors showed that some hot foods were within acceptable ranges, but others, such as pureed meat and vegetables, lasagna, and green beans, were served below recommended temperatures. Cold items, such as fruit cocktail, were sometimes served too warm, and some hot items were returned to the kitchen for reheating after being found out of range. The facility's dietary staff and management acknowledged that several food items were not within suitable temperature ranges during surveyor observations. The lack of consistent temperature control and the repeated resident complaints indicate a pattern of failure to provide meals that meet the required standards for palatability, appearance, and temperature. These deficiencies were observed to have the potential to affect a significant portion of the facility's resident population.
Deficient Food Storage, Temperature Control, and Staff Hygiene in Dietary Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by several observations and interviews. During a walkthrough of the dry storage area, a box of Quaker grits was found to be expired and was only discarded after being pointed out by the surveyor. Additionally, improper food holding temperatures were observed during meal service, with items such as meat puree and pureed vegetables being served below the required temperature range. These items were removed and reheated only after the deficiency was identified by staff and surveyors. Further, staff hygiene practices did not meet professional standards. A nursing assistant with visibly oily and unclean hair was observed assisting on the serving line without a hair net and was unaware of where hair nets were kept. The facility's policy requires food to be served at proper temperatures and staff to maintain appropriate hygiene, but these standards were not consistently followed during the survey observations.
Failure to Implement and Enforce Infection Prevention and Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program as evidenced by multiple observed lapses in infection control practices. During medication administration, a registered nurse broke a resident's Atorvastatin pill in half with bare hands, without wearing gloves, and then administered the medication. Both the nurse and the facility administrator confirmed that gloves were required when handling resident medications. In another instance, during a pressure ulcer dressing change for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to wounds, a PICC line, and a PEG feeding tube, three staff members (two LPNs and a CNA) did not wear the required isolation gowns, despite clear EBP orders, posted CDC signage, and available PPE outside the resident's room. All three staff members acknowledged that they should have worn the appropriate PPE, and this was confirmed by the Director of Nursing. Additionally, during a dining observation, staff failed to perform hand hygiene for residents in the main dining room prior to meals. The interim nursing home administrator confirmed that hand hygiene should have been completed before meals and noted that the facility had recently changed its meal delivery system, which may have contributed to the lapse. These observed failures in infection prevention and control practices had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents.
Nurse Aide Training Deficiency in Dementia and Alzheimer's Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed the required minimum of 12 hours of annual training during 2024, including specific education on dementia and Alzheimer's care. Record review showed that four out of five nurse aide personnel files lacked documentation of the required training hours, and there was no evidence of dementia or Alzheimer's training for these staff members. Additionally, posttests related to various educational subjects were present in the files, but none had been scored to assess the aides' knowledge, and there was no documentation of the time spent on each educational topic. During an interview, the HR Manager confirmed the lack of completed training and noted that the nursing educator had resigned several months prior.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Accurate Transfer Method
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise and accurately update a resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan to reflect the correct transfer status. Record review showed that the resident was care planned for transfers using a Hoyer lift with two staff, while documentation in the Activities of Daily Living Task report indicated the use of a best care stander for transfers. The resident was observed using a power wheelchair and, during an interview, stated that a people mover with one staff member was used for transfers in the morning and at bedtime. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the best care stander and people mover referred to the same device and acknowledged that the resident did not require a Hoyer lift, confirming the care plan was incorrect.
Failure to Individualize Resident Activity Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that activities were individualized and patient-centered for six residents, as evidenced by record review and staff interview. All six residents had identical care plans for the Activities Section, which included generic statements about activity preferences, satisfaction, and provision of an activities calendar, without any specific tailoring to individual interests or needs. The interim Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plans for these residents were the same, indicating a lack of individualized planning for activities. This deficiency was identified as a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents, with a facility census of 91 at the time.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for PICC Dressing Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders regarding the maintenance of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing for a resident. Observation revealed that the IV dressing, which was last changed on the evening of 03/03/25, had not been changed as required by the physician's order to change the dressing every seven days on the evening shift. On 03/11/25, it was noted that the dressing was overdue for a change, and an LPN on duty acknowledged that the dressing should have been changed the previous evening but was not, citing an inability to locate the necessary dressings at the time. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the dressings were available and agreed that the change should have occurred as ordered.
Failure to Consistently Assess and Document Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess and treat pressure ulcers according to professional standards of practice for one resident. The facility's policy required weekly evaluation and documentation of pressure ulcers. A resident developed open areas on the buttocks, identified as stage II pressure ulcers, and an order was placed for cleansing and silicone dressings three times a week. While weekly skin assessments were documented initially, one assessment did not include measurements or staging, and after a certain date, no further pressure ulcer assessments were documented for an extended period. Additionally, when the facility transitioned to a new electronic health record system, the pressure ulcer dressing change orders were not carried over. Subsequent weekly skin observation assessments failed to note the presence of open wounds, despite the resident having a pressure ulcer. It was not until a later wound evaluation that a stage II pressure ulcer was again documented, and a new treatment order was written. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that weekly assessments had not been completed as required and was unable to determine the healing status or continuity of the pressure ulcer, indicating a lapse in ongoing assessment and documentation.
Oxygen Therapy Provided Without Physician Order
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide oxygen services in accordance with accepted standards of care for one resident. The resident, who had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, was observed using supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula at three liters per minute. The resident stated she always used supplemental oxygen. However, review of the resident's records and confirmation from the regional nurse revealed that there was no physician's order for the oxygen therapy being administered. The facility's policy required verification of a physician's order prior to oxygen administration, but this step was not followed in this case.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Medical Record for Medication Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one resident. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an active order for gabapentin 600 mg, to be administered orally three times daily for seizures. However, the resident's diagnoses list did not include a diagnosis of seizures. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident did not have a seizure diagnosis and clarified that gabapentin had originally been prescribed in 2020 for diabetic neuropathy. The reason for the current order indicating use for seizures was unknown to the ADON.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 112 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Thomas
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 19 mi | ★★★★★ | 40 | 0 |
| Dennett Rehab Center | 19.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 0 |
| Garrett County Subacute Unit | 19.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Majestic Care Of Hopemont | 20.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 30 | 0 |
| Grant Rehabilitation And Care Center | 22 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Cortland Acres Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.