Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Tomahawk Health Services during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and safety measures for two residents with dementia and wandering risk. One resident with repeated elopement history exited the building without staff knowledge and without the Wanderguard alarm sounding, and staff later stated the alarm system was not detecting the tag properly. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering was observed without proper footwear and without a Wanderguard, while staff could not produce complete documentation of the required 30-minute checks.
Food handling standards were not followed when prepared items in the walk-in cooler were covered but not labeled or dated, two opened milk containers in the milk cooler had no open or use-by dates, and an uncovered box of potatoes in dry storage had no label or date. The facility's labeling and dating guidelines required food to be dated upon receipt and labeled with the item name, prep/receipt date, and use-by date.
Infection Prevention and Control Failures During COVID Outbreak: Surveyors observed multiple infection control breakdowns, including staff entering COVID-positive rooms without N95s, missing airborne precaution signage, overdue N95 fit testing, improper catheter and wound care practices, and lack of laundry temperature logs. Surveyors also observed dirty linens uncovered in a shared shower room, open and partially used personal care items not labeled for individual residents, and a used surgical mask left on a PPE cart.
Surveyors found that staff placed continuous glucose monitoring sensors on the upper chest for multiple residents even though the manufacturer instructions said the device should be applied to the upper arms only, and the facility had no policy or physician approval for using alternative sites. Surveyors also observed an LPN and the DON administer insulin without priming pen needles, and the DON gave doses that did not match the ordered amounts for two residents. In another instance, Ferrous Sulfate was administered to a resident even though the order did not include a measurable dose.
Medication error rates were above the allowed threshold, with an observed rate of 22.22% during med pass. An LPN administered Ferrous Sulfate without confirming the ordered dose, and multiple insulin administration errors were observed, including failure to prime insulin pens and administration of incorrect insulin doses by both an LPN and the DON. The DON stated the facility tracks medication errors and reviews them in QAPI meetings.
Failure to Notify MD of Significant Weight Gain: A cognitively intact resident with atrial fibrillation and CHF had a physician order for daily weights and to call the MD for a 3-lb weight gain in 1 day or more than 7 lbs in 1 week. The record showed missed weights and two separate 1-day weight gains over 3 lbs, but there was no documentation that the provider was notified; the DON stated nursing staff were expected to report changes as ordered.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment eloped from the facility without staff knowledge and was later found outside by a reporting party. The resident wore a Wanderguard bracelet that did not alarm because the system was faulty, and the facility did not know the resident was missing until law enforcement contacted them. The surveyor determined the incident was reportable to the State Agency, but the facility failed to report it.
Failure to provide bed-hold notice after hospital transfer: A resident with recurrent falls and a hip fracture was transferred to the ED after acute changes in condition and later admitted to the hospital. The facility did not provide or document written bed-hold information for the resident or representative, and although the BOM said a phone call was made to the wife and she declined to hold the bed, that conversation was not documented in the chart.
Failure to follow fall-prevention care plan interventions for two residents. One resident with dementia, wandering, and repeated falls was observed ambulating without grip socks or shoes even though the care plan required proper grip footwear, and CNA staff did not intervene. Another resident with CVA-related weakness and dementia had a care plan for gripper strips at bedside, but the strips were not observed next to the bed after the resident had previously been found on the floor while trying to get to the bathroom.
Care Plan Not Updated for Current Needs: A resident with diabetes, amputations, contractures, pain, and urinary retention had a care plan that still listed opioids, hand splints, foot care, and urinal assistance even though opioids had been stopped, hand splints were refused, and a Foley catheter was in place. The MDS showed the Foley catheter, but the care plan was not revised to reflect the resident’s current status.
A resident with ESRD and dependence on renal dialysis did not receive required pre- and post-dialysis monitoring. The record showed repeated missing weights, incomplete vital signs, and absent dialysis assessments on multiple dialysis days, despite orders and facility policy requiring full pre-dialysis communication, weights, and vital signs. Staff, including the DON, confirmed that full vital signs and weights were expected before and after dialysis treatments.
The facility did not follow the posted menu and failed to notify residents of a menu change, affecting all 43 residents. The planned meal was replaced with an unannounced 'Meal of the Month,' leading to resident complaints. Menus were not easily accessible, and communication about changes was inadequate, as confirmed by staff.
A resident in a LTC facility was not provided with their preferred meal texture despite having intact cognition and repeatedly requesting a regular diet. The resident, admitted for rehabilitation, expressed dissatisfaction with the mechanically altered diet, which was not changed due to a lack of follow-up on their request. The facility acknowledged the oversight but did not document further actions to address the resident's preference.
A resident was improperly charged for transportation to a medical appointment, a service covered under Medicaid. The facility's van was unavailable, and an outside provider was used, requiring upfront payment. The resident's family paid the provider, but the facility lacked documentation of the resident's agreement to the charge. Transportation is included in the Medicaid daily rate, and the facility acknowledged the resident should be reimbursed.
A resident with type 2 diabetes was not monitored for blood glucose levels as per hospital discharge orders after readmission to the facility. Despite the care plan's inclusion of diabetes management interventions, the facility failed to perform daily glucose checks, which was acknowledged by the DON.
A facility failed to maintain proper infection control during wound care for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The RN did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene after removing soiled dressings and before touching the resident's skin near open wounds. The RN acknowledged the oversight, and the DON confirmed the expectation of proper hand hygiene practices.
Failure to Supervise Residents at Risk for Elopement and Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices were in place to prevent elopement and falls for two residents. One resident had severe dementia, a history of wandering and elopement attempts, and had previously been admitted to a secured memory care unit before being moved to an open wing after a successful Wanderguard trial. Her record showed repeated wandering risk assessments, severe cognitive impairment, and care plan interventions focused on redirection and activity. The record also documented prior elopement incidents in which she exited the building without the alarm sounding, along with multiple notes that her Wanderguard was inoperable or not functioning, with no clear documentation of follow-up when those problems were identified. On the day of the incident, the resident exited the facility without staff knowledge and without the Wanderguard alarm sounding. She was later found by a citizen approximately 0.7 miles from the facility, covered with about an inch of snow on her head, and police were called. Staff stated she had dressed herself and walked out without them knowing, and the facility stated it did not know why the alarm did not sound. The report states the door box alarm had been marked as functioning, but the signal strength for detecting the bracelet was not set sensitive enough. The resident was later returned to the facility, and her room was changed to the memory care unit. The facility also did not follow the care plan and supervision measures for another resident with dementia, PTSD, wandering, repeated falls, and noncompliance with treatment. That resident had a BIMS score indicating severe cognitive impairment and a care plan that included proper-grip shoes and interventions for wandering, but was observed without shoes and without gripper socks. The resident was seen moving around the hall and dining room near the front entrance, sitting on a couch about 20 feet from the entrance/exit door, and did not have a Wanderguard in place. Staff stated the resident was monitored by 30-minute checks, but documentation for several periods was missing, and staff could not produce proof of those checks for the dates reviewed.
Food Storage Items Were Not Labeled or Dated
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure food was handled in accordance with professional food service standards. During an initial kitchen tour, the surveyor observed prepared food in the walk-in cooler that had been covered but was not labeled or dated, including individual pureed cake cups and vegetables in a serving container. The surveyor also observed two opened containers of milk in the milk cooler with no indication of when they were opened or when they should be used by, and an uncovered box of potatoes in dry storage with no label or date. The facility's Labeling and Dating guidelines stated that all foods should be dated upon receipt before being stored and that food labels must include the food item name, date of preparation/receipt/removal from freezer, and use-by date.
Infection Prevention and Control Failures During COVID Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for all 44 residents. During a COVID outbreak, surveyors observed that airborne precaution signs were not posted for some residents diagnosed with COVID, and CNA staff entered rooms of COVID-positive residents wearing regular face masks instead of fit-tested N95 respirators. Surveyors also observed a resident in the memory care unit wander into another resident’s room where the resident had tested positive for COVID, and staff stated they were not aware of other interventions to keep wandering residents out of COVID-positive rooms. Surveyors observed additional infection control failures during resident care. A CNA entered the room of a resident on airborne precautions without wearing an N95 mask as indicated on the posted sign, and later acknowledged that the N95 should have been worn. PPE carts outside COVID-positive rooms contained only one size of N95 mask for all staff, even though staff were fit tested for proper N95 use and several direct care staff were overdue for annual fit testing. The DON, who was also the infection preventionist, confirmed that annual fit testing was required and that some staff had not been fit tested within the required timeframe. The report also documented failures during catheter care, wound care, laundry processing, and shared shower room practices. A CNA emptied a Foley catheter bag with the collection container placed directly on the floor and the catheter drain port touching the edge of the urinal. An LPN performed wound care and removed gloves without performing hand hygiene before putting on new gloves. Laundry staff and maintenance staff stated there were no logs of washer water temperatures or dryer temperatures, and neither could identify monitored temperatures for the older laundry equipment. Surveyors observed dirty linens uncovered in a shared shower room where a resident with dementia rummaged through the hamper, and observed open, partially used personal care products in the shower room that were not labeled with a resident’s name or dated when opened. Surveyors also observed a ripped bag of soiled incontinent briefs on top of a soiled linen cart and a used surgical mask lying on a PPE cart outside a resident’s room.
Improper Glucose Sensor Placement and Medication Administration Errors
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not provide care according to accepted standards of practice for 4 of 5 residents reviewed, including R2, R6, R21, and R39. Surveyors observed that continuous glucose monitoring sensors were placed on the upper chest for all four residents, even though the manufacturer insert provided by the facility stated the sensor was to be applied to the upper arms only. The DON stated staff had looked up alternative sites online, the facility did not have a policy for use of the devices, and no physician approval orders were obtained for using alternative sites. The residents’ care plans and physician orders did not mention that alternative sites could be used for the sensors. Surveyors also observed insulin administration that did not follow the facility’s insulin pen procedure. An LPN administered Lantus to R21 and R39 without priming the pen needles. The DON administered Lantus to R2 by dialing up 45 units and giving that amount even though the order was for 43 units twice daily, stating that was how the pen was primed. The DON also administered Lantus to R6 by giving 12 units when the order was for 10 units daily. In addition, R21 received Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg even though the physician order in the record stated only to take one tablet every other day and did not include a measurable dose; the DON stated staff should clarify the dose with the physician when an order has no dosage.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded Allowed Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure medication error rates remained below 5 percent, and the observed error rate was 22.22% for 4 of 5 residents reviewed during medication pass. The facility policy titled Medication Orders, revised 01/23, states that medication orders must include dose and dose form, and any dose or order that appears inappropriate considering the resident's age, condition, allergies, or diagnosis is to be verified with the prescriber. During observation on 03/18/2026, an LPN administered Ferrous Sulfate to a resident without confirming the physician order contained a dosage, and the resident's record did not contain documentation clarifying the correct milligram dose with the physician. The DON stated the expectation would be for staff to clarify the dose with the physician when an order has no dosage. The surveyor also observed multiple insulin administration errors involving Lantus, Humalog, and Toujeo. Facility policy for subcutaneous insulin administration states insulin pens are to be primed before use and the dose is then dialed to the prescribed amount. An LPN administered Lantus without priming the pen, and later administered Humalog and Toujeo without priming either pen, resulting in incorrect dosing. The DON also administered Lantus by placing the needle on the pen and pulling up extra units, stating that was how the pen is primed, and then administered 45 units to a resident whose order was for 43 units twice daily. In another observation, the DON drew up 12 units of Lantus and administered 12 units to a resident whose order was for 10 units daily, resulting in a wrong dose. The DON stated the facility tracks medication errors and addresses them at least quarterly in QAPI meetings.
Failure to Notify MD of Significant Weight Gain
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not notify the physician as indicated by the physician’s order for a significant weight increase for 1 of 13 residents, R46. R46 was admitted with a diagnosis that included atrial fibrillation, had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, and was cognitively intact. The resident’s quarterly MDS listed a weight of 128 pounds, and the care plan addressed dehydration risk related to diuretic use with a goal of maintaining adequate hydration and stable weights. After a hospitalization for CHF, R46 was prescribed Furosemide 20 mg by mouth every morning on 2/20/26. The physician’s order dated 2/25/26 directed daily weights and to call the MD if there was a weight change of 3 pounds in 1 day or greater than 7 pounds in 1 week for CHF. The record showed no weights recorded and no documentation explaining why weights were not obtained on 3/8/26 and 3/10/26. On 3/13/26, R46’s weight increased from 128.4 pounds to 131.8 pounds, a gain of 3.4 pounds in one day, and on 3/17/26 the weight increased from 124.4 pounds to 127.8 pounds, a gain of 3.2 pounds in one day. Survey review found no documentation that the provider was updated about these weight changes, and the surveyor was not provided evidence that the provider had been notified. The DON stated that nursing staff were expected to report to the provider as indicated by orders.
Failure to Report Resident Elopement Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an incident involving a cognitively impaired resident who eloped from the facility without staff knowledge and was later found outside by a reporting party. The resident had a BIMS score of 00/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and was observed walking in the parking lot of a local thrift store with about an inch of snow on the resident's head. Police responded, EMS assisted with transport to the hospital for evaluation, and the facility was contacted only after law enforcement became involved. The resident had a Wanderguard bracelet that did not activate the alarm when the resident exited, and the facility reported that the alarm system was faulty. The facility was not aware the resident had left until notified by law enforcement, and the surveyor determined the event was reportable to the State Agency due to the high-risk circumstances and potential for serious harm or injury.
Failure to Provide Bed-Hold Notice After Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not provide written information specifying the bed-hold duration and payment policy to resident R49 or R49’s resident representative after R49 was transferred to the ED. The facility policy stated that, as part of the admission packet and at the time of transfer to the hospital, the facility would provide the resident and/or resident representative written information describing the State bed-hold policy and reserve bed payment policy, and would keep a signed and dated copy in the medical record. However, R49’s medical record did not contain a signed bed-hold policy, and there was no documentation that R49 or the representative received bed-hold information in writing or by phone. R49 was admitted with recurrent falls and a displaced left intertrochanteric hip fracture. After R49 developed increased lethargy, confusion, a non-reactive right pupil, and unstable vital signs, R49 was transferred to the ED and later admitted to the hospital. The hospital case manager later notified the facility that R49 would not be returning after discharge. The business office manager stated a phone call was made to R49’s wife on the day of transfer and that she declined to have the bed held, but this conversation was not documented in the medical record. R49’s representative later could not recall receiving bed-hold information or cost details and denied receiving a written notice.
Failure to Follow Fall-Prevention Care Plan Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not implement the comprehensive care plan for accident prevention for 2 residents reviewed for accidents. For R5, who had diagnoses including PTSD, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, wandering, repeated falls, and noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen, the care plan last revised 12/09/2025 identified fall risk related to dementia, anxiety medication, and wandering and included the intervention to ensure shoes have proper grip. Record review showed R5 had multiple falls in January 2026 and documented wandering behaviors. On 03/17/2026, the surveyor observed R5 sitting in the dining room without grip socks or shoes and then ambulating in the dining room and back to the room without proper footwear, while CNA staff were nearby and did not intervene or remind R5 to put on shoes or grip socks. During interview on 03/19/2026, CNA F stated staff try to keep a close eye on R5, but R5 moves about independently and takes shoes off. For R43, who had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left side, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, wandering, and generalized anxiety disorder, the care plan last revised 02/03/2026 identified fall risk related to weakness post CVA and dementia and included gripper strips at bedside. Record review showed R43 was found sitting on the floor in the room next to the bed on 02/27/2026 while attempting to get to the bathroom, and documented wandering behaviors were noted. On 03/19/2026, the surveyor observed R43 lying in bed resting and did not observe gripper strips on the floor next to the bed.
Care Plan Not Revised to Match Current Resident Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise one resident’s care plan after completion of the MDS assessment. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, contractures of both hands and knees due to palmar fascial fibromatosis, left below-the-knee amputation, cervical neck pain, back pain, neuropathy, enlarged prostate, and urinary retention. The resident’s most recent BIMS score was 8 of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. During observation, the resident was seen in bed with bilateral below-the-knee amputations and an indwelling Foley catheter, and stated that opioids had been taken away to try other things and that he did not want hand splints. The resident’s care plan still included opioid use for chronic pain, right hand splint use, diabetic foot care and daily foot inspections, a blue protective boot to the right foot, and assistance with a male urinal to avoid friction on plastic. Record review showed the last opioid dose was on 12/1/25, the resident was no longer receiving opioids, the resident refused hand splints, and the resident had an indwelling Foley catheter in place. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated use of an indwelling Foley catheter, but the care plan was not revised to reflect the resident’s current status. The VPS stated that the care plans should have been updated and old information removed.
Missed Pre- and Post-Dialysis Weights and Vital Signs
Penalty
Summary
Safe, appropriate dialysis care/services were not provided for a resident who required hemodialysis. The facility did not ensure that the resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident’s goals and preferences. The resident, R7, was admitted with diagnoses including acquired absence of kidney, chronic kidney disease stage 5, end stage renal disease, heart failure, history of malignant neoplasm of kidney, and dependence on renal dialysis. R7’s orders required a complete pre-dialysis assessment to be printed and sent with the resident to dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, along with weekly weights and weekly vital signs on Friday shower day. Surveyor review of R7’s records showed repeated omissions in dialysis-related monitoring. In February, out of 12 dialysis days, vital signs other than blood pressure were not completed before dialysis on multiple occasions, 7 of 12 days had no pre-dialysis weight, and one pre-dialysis assessment was absent. In March, out of 7 dialysis days, vital signs were not completed before dialysis on every dialysis day, one day had no vital signs at all before the appointment, and 5 of 7 days had no pre-dialysis weight. Post-dialysis records also showed missing documentation, including 3 absent assessments in February, one day with no post-dialysis weight in February, and no post-dialysis weights in March. The record also showed an 11.4-pound weight loss on 03/04/26 and a 7.8-pound weight gain on 03/09/26. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation that full vital signs and weights should be completed before and after dialysis, and the DON stated this was the facility’s expectation.
Failure to Follow and Communicate Menu Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow the posted menu and did not notify residents of a menu change, affecting all 43 residents. On the day of the survey, the lunch menu was supposed to include Chinese Pork Chop Suey, egg rolls, fried rice, and diced pears. However, residents received a meal consisting of a hot dog, sauerkraut, parsley potatoes, a biscuit, and pudding with whipped topping. This discrepancy led to complaints from residents, including one who requested a bowl of cereal as an alternative because he was not informed of the menu change. The facility's policy requires menus to be planned in advance, posted in various locations, and followed, but these procedures were not adhered to. The issue was compounded by the facility's practice of serving a 'Meal of the Month,' chosen by a small group of Resident Council members, which was not communicated effectively to all residents. The dietary staff decided when this meal would be served, and it was not always suitable for all residents' dietary needs. Menus were posted in locations that were difficult for residents in wheelchairs to see, and there was no consistent method for informing residents of menu changes. The facility's staff, including the Nursing Home Administrator and Social Services Director, confirmed the lack of communication and participation in the Resident Council, contributing to the deficiency.
Failure to Honor Resident's Meal Preference
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination by not honoring a resident's request to change their meal texture. The resident, who was admitted for rehabilitation after a knee fracture and had intact cognition, expressed dissatisfaction with the mechanically altered diet they were receiving. Despite having requested a regular diet for five weeks, the resident continued to receive pureed meals, which they described as 'baby food.' The resident's dissatisfaction was noted by a staff member who stated that they could not change the meal without an updated order. The resident's progress notes indicated a complaint about the diet, and a referral to speech therapy (ST) was made. However, there was no follow-up on the resident's preference for a regular diet, and the ST evaluation notes did not address the issue after a certain period. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of follow-up and noted that the resident had not made further complaints, but also acknowledged the absence of additional follow-up notes. Ultimately, the resident was offered the option to wait for another ST evaluation or sign a risk vs. benefit form to receive a regular diet.
Resident Charged for Medicaid-Covered Transportation Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility charged a resident, identified as R41, for transportation services to a medical appointment, which is a service covered under Medicaid. R41 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including anemia, atrial fibrillation, and multiple myeloma, and had intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 12/14. The facility's van driver was unavailable, and an outside transportation service was used, resulting in a charge to R41, which was not communicated to her in advance, either orally or in writing. The facility's admission packet and related documents did not list transportation services as a chargeable item, and the facility lacked a specific policy for transportation services. On the day of the appointment, the facility arranged for an outside transportation provider, TD C, to transport R41. The transportation provider required payment upfront, which was facilitated by R41's son-in-law. Upon arrival at the medical appointment, it was discovered that there was no appointment scheduled, and R41 was returned to the facility. Interviews with facility staff, including the Nursing Home Administrator and Business Office Manager, revealed that transportation is included in the daily rate for Medicaid residents, and the facility typically bills Medicaid for such services. However, due to outstanding bills, the transportation provider only accepted private pay, and there was no documentation of R41's agreement to the charge. The facility acknowledged the issue and indicated that R41 should be reimbursed for the transportation cost.
Failure to Monitor Blood Glucose Levels
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. A resident, who was admitted for rehabilitation after a knee fracture and had a history of type 2 diabetes, was readmitted to the facility following a hospital stay for sepsis, UTI, and acute kidney injury. The hospital discharge summary recommended daily blood glucose monitoring, which was not performed by the facility. The resident's care plan included interventions for diabetes management, but the Director of Nursing acknowledged that blood glucose levels had not been checked since the resident's readmission, missing the hospital's discharge order for daily testing.
Inadequate Infection Control During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by the actions of a Registered Nurse (RN) during wound care for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis and stage 3 pressure ulcers, required specific infection control measures during care. During an observation, the RN did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene after removing soiled dressings and before donning new gloves. The RN also touched various surfaces and the resident's skin near open wounds without proper glove use or hand sanitization. The RN's actions were observed by a surveyor, who noted the lack of adherence to the facility's policy on EBP, which requires targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. The RN acknowledged the oversight and the importance of using personal protective equipment to prevent infection. The Director of Nursing agreed with the surveyor's findings and confirmed that appropriate hand hygiene practices were expected during such procedures.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 23 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Tomahawk
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverview Health Services | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Friendly Village Nursing And Rehab Center | 16.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Pine Crest Health And Memory Care | 19.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Rennes Health And Rehab Center-rhinelander | 20 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 1 |
| Careview Health And Rehab Of Minocqua | 27.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 64 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Tomahawk Health Services.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.