Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia and other chronic conditions was identified as at risk for pressure injuries, but bilateral heel wounds were not comprehensively assessed right away, physician treatment orders were delayed, and the care plan did not initially address the heel ulcers, pain, refusals of heel boots, or the resident’s habit of propelling the wheelchair with the feet/heels. Wound documentation had gaps, RN validation was lacking, and the resident continued to report heel pain while the right heel later had x-ray findings suspicious for calcaneal osteomyelitis.
Unsafe glove use and thermometer contamination during meal service: During lunch service, Cook-E handled ready-to-eat foods with the same gloves across multiple tasks, including plating cooked ravioli, serving green beans, and touching serving utensils and plates without washing hands or changing gloves. A tethered thermometer string also rested against the cooked ravioli while temperatures were taken. The DOH had no response for the thermometer string in the food or the lack of hand hygiene and glove changes.
A resident with asthma, HTN, AFib, and moderate cognitive impairment was observed with an Advair inhaler at bedside and stated she used it independently. The record did not contain a completed self-administration assessment or care plan entry for the inhaler at the time of the survey, despite facility policy requiring evaluation of the resident’s ability to self-administer and safe storage of self-administered meds.
Incomplete Assessment for Psychotropic Medication Use: A resident with depression, anxiety, and insomnia was receiving three antidepressant medications, but the medical record did not contain a comprehensive assessment for their use. The MDS CAA for psychotropic drug use was blank, and although hourly sleep studies were documented on the TAR, there was no additional documentation showing a comprehensive insomnia, depression, or anxiety assessment. The DON acknowledged the missing assessment documentation.
Incomplete CAA Documentation for Triggered MDS Care Areas: The facility did not document required CAA narrative summaries for triggered MDS care areas for three residents. One resident had triggered CAAs for falls, pressure injury, psychotropic drug use, psychosocial well-being, and behavioral symptoms, while two other residents had triggered falls CAAs. Survey review found checked boxes on the CAAs, but no narrative analysis of the MDS data, the impact of the issues, or the rationale for care plan decisions.
A resident with metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonia, and HTN was discharged to the hospital due to a change in condition, but the discharge MDS was not completed and was documented as late. The MDS Coordinator said the omission was an oversight.
A resident’s admission MDS inaccurately documented tracheostomy care in Section O0110, even though surveyor observation and interview confirmed the resident did not have a tracheostomy. The resident was admitted with dx including a right lower leg fracture, asthma, HTN, and A-fib, and the MDS also noted moderate cognitive impairment and independence with eating. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged the error and stated it was a mistake.
Incomplete Baseline Care Plan on Admission: A resident with severe cognitive impairment, multiple diagnoses, pressure injuries, and a history of frequent falls was admitted without a thoroughly completed baseline care plan. Several required sections were blank, and the plan did not document the resident’s skin impairment or high fall risk with person-centered interventions; the DON and NHA acknowledged the care plan was incomplete.
Failure to Complete Neuro Checks After Unwitnessed Falls: The facility did not document required neuro checks for a resident after unwitnessed falls, despite its policy requiring assessments at the time of the incident, 30 minutes later, 60 minutes later, and on subsequent shifts for 72 hours. The resident had dementia, a BIMS score of 0, and a history of multiple falls, and the DON confirmed neuro checks should be completed after any unwitnessed fall.
A resident with dementia and documented hearing and vision impairment was repeatedly observed without glasses and bilateral hearing aids. The care plan and orders included assistance with hearing aids and glasses, but the resident’s glasses were found off and the hearing aids were not in place during multiple survey observations. Staff gave inconsistent accounts about the hearing aids being missing or not worn, and the record showed limited documentation of refusal, attempts, or follow-up regarding the hearing aids not working.
A resident with dementia, severe cognitive impairment, and a history of falls was changed from a mechanical lift to a sit-to-stand transfer without HCPOA notification, then slipped from the sling during an assisted transfer when staff were distracted by a cord in the pathway and sustained a scalp laceration requiring staples. The facility also had other residents with repeated falls where investigations were incomplete and fall interventions such as low bed positioning, mats, and safe bed-bath technique were not consistently in place.
Medication Administration Error During G-Tube Pass: A resident received morning meds through a G-tube in a manner that did not follow the facility’s enteral tube policy. An RN crushed and prepared multiple meds separately, but then mixed them together in one syringe and instilled them at the same time instead of giving each med separately with flushes between meds. The DON later acknowledged the RN did not follow policy, and the medication error rate was 33.33%.
The facility did not ensure required nurse staffing posting information was posted and did not document the total CNA hours on the daily staffing sheets. Surveyors reviewed nurse staffing schedules and posting information and found the CNA hours were missing. The Staffing Specialist said this was an oversight, and the NHA stated the postings were completed by hand and the CNA hours were omitted.
The facility did not promptly report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft, nor did it communicate the results of its investigation to the proper authorities as required.
A resident in a LTC facility was found without their call light within reach, despite being dependent on staff for assistance due to activity intolerance and anemia. The care plan required the call light to be accessible to prevent falls and ensure prompt assistance. The resident had to use a cordless phone to call for help, as the call light was attached to the bed, out of reach. This issue was reported to the NHA and DON.
The facility failed to follow infection control procedures for three residents, including improper hand hygiene during wound care, failure to use gowns for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and not changing gloves during incontinence care. These actions were observed by surveyors and involved residents with complex medical conditions, highlighting lapses in adherence to infection control policies.
Delayed Assessment and Incomplete Care for Bilateral Heel Pressure Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure a resident with bilateral heel pressure injuries received timely, comprehensive assessment, physician orders, and care planning after admission. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including vascular dementia, hypertension, anxiety, depression, and a rib fracture, and was identified on the facility Braden Scale as at risk for pressure injuries. Although a registered nurse documented scabbed areas on both heels shortly after admission, the heels were not comprehensively assessed at that time, no treatment orders were obtained from a physician, and the baseline care plan did not address the heel wounds or related risks. A wound LPN later documented both heels as unstageable pressure injuries with necrosis/slough, but the areas were not comprehensively assessed by an RN. The resident complained of pain during wound data collection, yet pain was not addressed on the care plan. The resident also refused to wear bilateral heel boots, but the care plan and CNA care card did not include an alternative method for offloading the heels when boots were refused. The resident self-propelled the wheelchair using the feet/heels, and that risk factor was not addressed in the care plan. Survey observations showed the resident in bed multiple times without heel boots and without heels floated or otherwise offloaded. The wound documentation also showed gaps and inconsistencies. Weekly wound assessments were missing for some weeks, and survey review found no comprehensive RN validation of the wound data collected by the wound LPN. The resident continued to report heel pain during later assessments, and the right heel remained unstageable for weeks before eventually showing improvement. An x-ray of the right heel later showed findings suspicious for calcaneal osteomyelitis, and IV antibiotics were started afterward. The surveyor also noted that the facility’s baseline and revised care plans were incomplete or delayed in addressing the heel pressure injuries, the resident’s refusals, and the pressure risk associated with using the heels to propel the wheelchair.
Unsafe glove use and thermometer contamination during meal service
Penalty
Summary
Food was not served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety during lunch service on the 5th floor. During observation, Cook-E handled prepared foods while wearing gloves for multiple tasks, including touching ready-to-eat foods without washing hands or changing gloves between tasks. Cook-E used the same gloved hand to place cooked ravioli on plates, serve green beans with tongs, handle serving utensils and plates, and touch multiple food items during plate assembly. Cook-E also used a knife to cut ravioli on a board that had been used to place non-food items on, while continuing to serve food with the same gloves. The food thermometer used during service had a tethered string that rested against the cooked ravioli while temperatures were being taken. The facility policy stated gloves must be changed when switching tasks or workstations and that wearing the same glove for multiple tasks is not permitted. During interview, Cook-E stated awareness of food barriers and glove use but did not respond to using gloves on multiple items without washing hands or changing gloves. The Director of Hospitality did not have a response for the thermometer string being in the food or for why Cook-E did not wash hands or change gloves before touching ready-to-eat food.
Missing Self-Administration Assessment for Resident’s Inhaler
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that 1 resident received the necessary assessment to self-administer medications. On 2/16/26 at 9:44 a.m., the surveyor observed an Advair inhaler on the table beside the resident’s bed and interviewed the resident, who stated she used the inhaler independently and had been using it for many years. The resident also stated that nurses left the inhaler in her possession. Review of the resident’s record showed no completed self-administration of medications assessment at that time, and the care plan did not address self-administration of the inhaler. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including right lower leg fracture, asthma, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. The admission MDS documented moderate cognitive impairment and independence with eating. The facility’s policy required staff and the practitioner to assess mental and physical abilities and specific medication-related skills before allowing self-administration, and it also required safe storage of self-administered medications. During the exit meeting, the surveyor requested the assessment, and the DON later provided one dated after the observation. The DON stated she was not sure why the assessment had not been completed earlier and acknowledged the concern that the inhaler was not secured where other residents could not access it.
Incomplete Assessment for Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure a resident receiving psychotropic medications was comprehensively assessed for their use. Resident R38 was admitted with an activated POAHC and diagnoses of unspecified insomnia, unspecified depression, and unspecified anxiety disorder. On admission, R38 was receiving Duloxetine for depression, Bupropion for dysthymia, and Trazadone for insomnia, and the admission MDS documented that the resident was receiving antidepressant and antianxiety medications. The medical record did not contain documentation of a comprehensive assessment for the use of these medications. The MDS CAA for Psychotropic Drug Use did not document a comprehensive assessment for depression, anxiety, or insomnia, and surveyor review found no documentation related to depression medication indications for use or adequate monitoring. The TAR showed hourly sleep studies for several days in December 2025 and January 2026, documenting whether the resident was asleep or awake, but there was no additional documentation related to a comprehensive insomnia assessment using that information. The DON acknowledged the CAA summary assessment was blank and stated there was no additional staff information related to the assessment.
Incomplete CAA Documentation for Triggered MDS Care Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not document additional assessment summaries for Care Area Assessments (CAAs) triggered by Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment information for 3 of 12 residents reviewed. The report states that the CAAs were used to help analyze data obtained from the MDS and to develop individualized care plans, but the required narrative summaries analyzing the triggered care areas and the need for individualized care planning were not completed for the residents identified in the review. For one resident, the admission MDS completed on 12/12/25 triggered CAAs for falls, pressure injury, psychotropic drug use, psychosocial well-being, and behavioral symptoms. The resident had diagnoses including unspecified insomnia, unspecified depression, unspecified anxiety disorder, and later documentation also listed fracture of one rib, vascular dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, insomnia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The resident had an activated POAHC/HCPOA, a BIMS score of 0, no depressive symptoms, range of motion impairment in one upper extremity, required extensive assistance with multiple activities of daily living, had two unstageable pressure injuries, and had experienced 2 or more falls. Surveyor review found checked boxes on the CAAs, but no narrative describing the impact of the problems, the rationale for care plan decisions, or an assessment summary analyzing the MDS data. For another resident, the Significant Change in Status MDS completed on 11/19/25 triggered a CAA for falls. That resident had diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, GERD, dementia, and anxiety disorder, with an activated HCPOA, BIMS score of 0, verbal and other behaviors 1-3 days, ROM impairment in one lower extremity, dependence for several ADLs, minimal hearing difficulty with hearing aids, and 2 or more falls since admission or the previous assessment. The falls CAA contained checked boxes, but no narrative describing the impact of the problem or the rationale for a care plan decision. A third resident had an admission MDS completed on 11/16/25 that triggered a falls CAA; that resident had parkinsonism, anxiety, hypertension, severe cognitive impairment, dependence for bathing and rolling in bed, a fall prior to admission, and a fall risk assessment indicating high risk for falls. The CAA documented history of falls, confusion, and weakness, but did not include an additional assessment summary analyzing the MDS data and need for an individualized care plan.
Late Discharge MDS Not Completed for a Resident Sent to Hospital
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that 1 of 12 residents reviewed received a completed discharge MDS. R52 was admitted with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonia, and hypertension, then discharged to the hospital on 9/10/25 due to a change in condition. Review of the MDS record showed that a discharge MDS was not completed on the discharge date, and the medical record indicated the MDS was late. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated she had been hired in October and had not done much with MDSs because she was training, and she later stated the missing discharge MDS was an oversight.
Inaccurate MDS documented tracheostomy care for a resident without a tracheostomy
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure one of 12 residents reviewed received an accurate comprehensive MDS assessment. R2 was admitted with diagnoses of right lower leg fracture, asthma, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation, and the admission MDS documented moderate cognitive impairment, independence with eating, and that R2 was receiving tracheostomy care in Section O0110 Special Treatments Procedures and Programs. Surveyor observation and interview found that R2 did not have a tracheostomy. During interview, the MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the facility does not accept residents with tracheostomies, agreed that R2 did not have a tracheostomy, and stated that the MDS entry was a mistake.
Incomplete Baseline Care Plan on Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for R38. R38 was admitted with diagnoses including a right rib fracture, vascular dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, insomnia, anxiety disorder, and depression, and had an activated HCPOA. The admission MDS documented a BIMS score of 0, indicating severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, along with need for supervision for eating, partial/moderate assistance for transfers, substantial/maximum assistance for upper body dressing and mobility, and dependence for showers and lower body dressing. The MDS also documented a pressure injury with two unstageable areas, risk for pressure injuries, and physical and other behaviors for 1-3 days of the last 7 days. Survey review of the undated baseline care plan found multiple sections left blank, including the reason for admission, disease/illness management interventions, ADL assistance, psychosocial well-being care interventions, other special care instructions, physician orders for therapy, activity/mobility, labs, and medication/treatment documentation. The wound section only had front and back body figures circled without further detail, despite documentation that R38 had skin impairment on the back of both heels on admission. The hospital record also documented frequent falls and up to 15 falls in the 2 weeks before hospital admission, but the baseline care plan did not document the pressure injuries or high fall risk with person-centered interventions. The facility’s physician orders indicated the baseline care plan was to be verified as complete and signed by the responsible party for one day only, and the DON and NHA acknowledged that the baseline care plan was not complete.
Failure to Complete Neurological Checks After Unwitnessed Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not complete neurological checks in accordance with its Falls policy and procedure for resident R38 after unwitnessed falls. The policy revised 12/25 states that the nurse shall assess and document neurological status, and the facility’s process requires checks at the time of the incident, 30 minutes post-incident, 60 minutes post-incident, and on following shifts for 72 hours. Survey review found that R38 had three unwitnessed falls, and one unwitnessed fall on 1/18/26 had no documented neuro-checks completed per facility policy and process. R38 was admitted with diagnoses including fracture of one rib on the right side, vascular dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, essential hypertension, insomnia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The admission MDS documented a BIMS score of 0, indicating severely impaired skills for daily decision making, along with assistance needs for eating, transfers, dressing, mobility, and showers, and a history of 2 or more falls since admission or the previous assessment. During interview, the DON stated that neuro-checks should be completed for any unwitnessed fall, and the surveyor identified that R38 was missing a shift of neuro-checks following the 1/17/26 unwitnessed fall and had no documented neuro-checks following the 1/18/26 unwitnessed fall.
Failure to Provide and Document Use of Hearing Aids and Glasses
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure a resident with hearing and vision impairment received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing and vision abilities. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and GERD. The resident’s MDS documented severely impaired decision-making with a BIMS score of 0, minimal hearing difficulty with hearing aids, and dependence for many activities of daily living. The care plan and physician orders included bilateral hearing aids and glasses, with assistance for placement of hearing aids in the morning and removal at bedtime. During the survey, the resident was repeatedly observed without glasses and without bilateral hearing aids while sitting in a broda chair at the nurse’s station or in the dining room. The resident’s purple glasses were observed on the window ledge in the room, and the hearing aids were not in place during multiple observations. The care plan did not address the resident’s vision and hearing loss in detail, did not address refusal to wear glasses or hearing aids, and did not include interventions for refusals. The resident’s MARs showed multiple days in January and February when the resident was documented as not wearing hearing aids. Staff interviews showed inconsistent information about the hearing aids. Two CNAs stated the hearing aids had been missing for awhile and did not know how long they had been missing. A nurse manager stated the resident did not wear glasses as much anymore and that the hearing aids were kept at the nurse’s station, with nurses responsible for validating that the resident was wearing them. An LPN stated an attempt was made to place the hearing aids, but the resident pulled at the ears and grabbed at them, so the hearing aids were returned to the charger because the resident would not wear them. The record review showed only one progress note stating the hearing aids were located and charged, with no documented follow-up for the hearing aids not working and no documented note that the resident refused them.
Unsafe transfers and incomplete fall investigations
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safe transfer assistance for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, dependence for transfers and mobility, and a history of falls. The resident had been admitted with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, malnutrition, GERD, and an L3 compression fracture. The resident’s MDS documented a BIMS score of 0, dependence for transfers and mobility, and a history of 2 or more falls. The care plan and CNA care card identified the resident as a mechanical lift transfer with assistance of two staff, but the resident’s transfer status was later changed to a sit-to-stand transfer after a PT evaluation. The resident’s HCPOA was not consulted or notified of the change in care. During the transfer on 2/14/26, two CNAs attempted to use the sit-to-stand lift even though the resident showed resistance to sitting upright, had difficulty releasing staff hands to hold the bars, and was not stable during the transfer. The CNAs also proceeded while a cord was in the pathway of the lift and turned their attention away from the resident to move the cord. The resident slipped from the sling while elevated and struck the head on the bed, resulting in bleeding and a hospital transfer. Emergency room documentation confirmed a scalp laceration and staples were placed to the back of the head. Staff later stated the resident should never have been made a sit-to-stand transfer and that the resident had good days and bad days, including times when the resident was weaker and more disoriented. The facility also did not ensure comprehensive fall investigations and consistent implementation of fall interventions for other residents. One resident with vascular dementia, impaired mobility, and a history of frequent falls had three unwitnessed falls, including one where the mattress was not properly secured during a bed bath and the resident rolled off the bed, another where the resident slipped from the edge of the bed onto a fall mat, and another where the resident was found on the floor with loose stool and the bed mat in place. Survey observations showed the resident did not consistently have the bed in the lowest position, the fall mat in place, or gripper socks on. A third resident with parkinsonism, anxiety, hypertension, severe cognitive impairment, and dependence for bathing and rolling in bed was found on the floor beside the bed with blood from the head; the investigation showed the bed had been left in a high position and the CNA stated she was not sure whether the bed was at the lowest position as required.
Medication Administration Error During G-Tube Pass
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that medication administration through an enteral tube was completed without error, and the medication error rate was 33.33%, exceeding the 5 percent threshold. During observation on 2/17/26 at 9:00 a.m., RN-F prepared R6’s morning medications for administration through a G-tube by dispensing ten medications into individual cups, crushing nine tablets separately, and pouring one liquid medication. RN-F initially poured water into each crushed medication separately and checked tube placement, but then mixed all of the medications in the same syringe and instilled them into the G-tube at the same time, rather than administering each medication separately with flushes between medications as described in the facility policy. The facility’s policy for administering medications through an enteral tube, dated March 2015, states not to mix medications together prior to administration, to administer each medication separately, and to flush with water between medications. During the observation, R6’s family member told RN-F that it was easier to administer all of the medications at the same time. On 2/18/26 at 10:08 a.m., the DON acknowledged that RN-F did not follow the facility’s policy when administering R6’s medications through the G-tube and stated that the family member was particular about R6’s care. No additional information was provided.
Missing CNA Hours on Daily Staffing Postings
Penalty
Summary
Post nurse staffing information every day. Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility did not ensure the required nurse staff posting information was posted and did not document the total amount of hours for CNAs. Surveyors reviewed January 2026 and February 2026 nurse staff schedules along with the nurse staff posting information and found that the posting did not include the total number of hours for CNAs. The facility policy titled Staffing Hours Posting Procedure, created 1/2020, required the nursing scheduler to create and post weekday BIPA sheets, with required nursing staff hours based on position for all 3 shifts, and required the Nurse Manager/DON to verify presence and accuracy. The Staffing Specialist stated they were responsible for completing the staff posting information and said the missing CNA staffing hours were an oversight. The NHA stated the postings were made by hand and the CNA hours were missing, and that the NHA or DON would be responsible for daily postings if the Staffing Specialist was absent.
Failure to Timely Report Suspected Abuse, Neglect, or Theft
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and did not report the results of the investigation to the proper authorities. This deficiency was identified based on the facility's lack of prompt action in notifying the appropriate agencies when an incident of suspected abuse, neglect, or theft occurred. The report indicates that the required notifications and investigation results were not communicated as mandated.
Resident's Call Light Not Within Reach
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was within reach, which is a critical component of their care plan. The resident, identified as R290, was observed in their room without the call light accessible, despite being completely dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living due to conditions such as activity intolerance and anemia. The care plan specifically indicated that the call light should be within reach to prevent falls and ensure prompt response to requests for assistance. However, during the surveyor's observation, the call light was attached to the bed, out of the resident's reach, and the resident expressed that they would need to yell for help. Further observations revealed that the resident had to use a cordless phone to call the front desk for assistance, as the call light was not accessible. The resident reported that a staff member moved the bedside table with the phone out of reach, leaving them unable to call for help. The surveyor noted that the resident could not move around the room without assistance, highlighting the importance of having the call light within reach. This deficiency was communicated to the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing by the surveyor.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed for three residents, leading to deficiencies in hand hygiene and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). For Resident R13, the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care and used scissors without sanitizing them to cut through a package of Xeroform. The IP also did not open the package to access the dressing directly, which is against standard practice. Resident R290 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to an indwelling catheter, but staff members did not follow the required protocol. The staff did not don gowns while providing high-contact care, such as incontinence care, despite the presence of an EBP sign and PPE cart outside the room. This oversight was confirmed when a staff member incorrectly informed the surveyor that R290 was not on any precautions. For Resident R22, who has severely impaired cognition and is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to change soiled gloves and perform hand hygiene before applying lotion after incontinence care. This lapse in infection control practices was observed during a surveyor's visit, highlighting a failure to adhere to the facility's hand hygiene policy, which mandates hand hygiene before and after glove removal and between different care tasks.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 739 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 16 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Milwaukee
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milwaukee Catholic Home | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Edenbrook Lakeside | 0.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Saint Johns On The Lake | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Jewish Home And Care Center | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 3 |
| Milwaukee Health And Rehab | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv Ctr.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.