Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Life Care Center Of Port Townsend during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
PASRR screening was not completed accurately for two residents before admission. One resident had anxiety disorder documented in the MDS and an order for PRN lorazepam, but the initial PASRR did not include the anxiety diagnosis. Another resident was admitted with no mental health diagnosis listed, yet the med list included an antidepressant and an antianxiety med, and the hospital record showed anxiety; the PASRR still indicated no mental health concerns.
Psychotropic meds were not properly monitored or justified for three residents. One resident with dementia and depression had quetiapine and trazodone ordered, but there was no target behavior monitoring for the antidepressant. Another resident had escitalopram and PRN lorazepam for anxiety despite no MH dx listed in the facility record, and the DNS said the diagnosis and justification should have been documented. A third resident with Alzheimer’s, anxiety, and physical aggression received PRN risperidone, lorazepam, and haloperidol for agitation or care-related behaviors, but the TARs did not document the behaviors or non-drug interventions attempted before the meds were given, and the resident also showed oral-facial movements consistent with tardive dyskinesia that were not documented on the TAR.
Failure to follow up on PASRR Level 2 evaluations for two residents with serious mental illness indicators. One resident had PASRR findings for psychotic, depressive, delusion, and Lewy body neurocognitive disorders, and another had findings for major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Both residents’ EHRs lacked Level 2 evaluations, and staff reported limited or no follow-up with the state regarding the referrals.
Call Light and Water Left Out of Reach: A cognitively intact resident who needed assistance with eating was found with the call light hanging out of reach and the water container placed too far away to access. The resident said they sometimes had to wait for help to reach the call light or get a drink, and staff later assisted with water and moved the call light into reach after it was identified as out of place.
Failure to prevent new pressure ulcers was cited for a resident who was severely cognitively impaired, had communication deficits, and was at risk for skin breakdown. The resident initially had two Stage 2 pressure ulcers that healed, but later developed two Stage 1 coccyx ulcers that progressed to two Stage 2 ulcers. Documentation noted an air overlay mattress, barrier cream, and later an air mattress, while the DON confirmed the resident’s wounds worsened during the stay.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and communication deficits experienced progressive weight loss from 108 lbs to 90.8 lbs over about five months, while the facility continued the same general supplement regimen and did not document food preference evaluations or a change to NEM, fortified foods, or calorie-dense meals. Meal records showed the resident usually ate only 0-25% of meals, and MNA findings documented worsening intake and malnutrition, but no follow-up recommendations were recorded. Staff confirmed the resident’s preferred foods were known but not documented, and no additional nutritional interventions were identified.
Three residents had their beds positioned against the wall, and one also had a mobility bar, without proper restraint assessments, care plans, or documentation. Staff interviews confirmed that required evaluations and consents were not completed for these arrangements, despite facility expectations.
Several residents received opioid pain medications without documented attempts at non-pharmacological interventions as ordered, and pain medications were administered outside of prescribed pain score parameters. Additionally, some residents received antihypertensive and diuretic medications despite low blood pressure readings, without appropriate reassessment or provider notification. Staff confirmed that documentation and adherence to medication protocols were lacking.
The facility did not obtain updated PASRR assessments for two residents with significant mental illness diagnoses. Despite Level 1 PASRR screenings indicating serious mental illness, no referrals for Level 2 PASRR evaluations were made, as confirmed by record review and staff interviews.
Surveyors found that the facility did not include resident-specific interventions in care plans for multiple residents, such as management of chronic diarrhea, oral hygiene needs, bed positioning, diuretic use, edema, and dental issues. These omissions were confirmed through staff interviews and record reviews, indicating that care plans did not accurately reflect assessed needs or provide necessary direction to staff.
The facility did not consistently perform daily weights or notify the provider when weights could not be obtained for a resident with CHF, failed to document side effects of an antidepressant as ordered, did not implement hospice recommendations for wound care for a resident with oral cancer, and did not initiate required monitoring after a resident's hospital readmission. Staff interviews confirmed these lapses in following physician orders and professional standards.
Two residents who required assistance with oral hygiene did not receive necessary support, resulting in poor oral hygiene and lack of access to supplies. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that oral care was not consistently provided, not documented, and not included in care plans or the EHR task system. Supplies for oral care were not accessible, and staff were unaware of the need to assist or document oral care for these residents.
Surveyors identified that an open insulin pen on a medication cart was not dated as required, and a medication room refrigerator log was missing multiple temperature entries despite being used for medication storage. Additionally, food was found left on top of a medication cart with no staff intervention, and facility leadership confirmed these practices did not meet expectations.
Surveyors found that kitchen staff did not consistently wear required hair restraints while working, and the facility's dishwasher repeatedly failed to reach the necessary wash and rinse temperatures for proper sanitization over several months. The Dietary Manager confirmed both the lack of PPE use and the ongoing temperature issues with the dishwasher.
The facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices, including improper storage and handling of oxygen equipment for a resident on oxygen therapy, lack of hand hygiene by staff during dining services, failure to use PPE as required for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions, and improper handling and storage of linens by laundry staff. These actions did not follow facility protocols and were confirmed by facility leadership as not meeting expectations.
The facility failed to verify a CNA's credentials through the nurse aide registry before allowing them to provide care. The CNA was hired without proper documentation, and the facility's Administrator confirmed the oversight, which placed residents at risk for abuse and unmet care needs.
PASRR screening missed anxiety diagnoses before admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to screen residents for mental health conditions prior to admission for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Resident 12 was admitted with a diagnosis of anxiety disorder documented in the MDS and had a physician order for lorazepam as needed for anxiety. The resident’s Level 1 PASRR, completed before admission, indicated no serious mental illness indicators and did not document anxiety disorder. The Social Service Director later stated the PASRR had been reviewed and found to be incorrect because of the anxiety disorder, and that a corrected PASRR was not completed until 03/11/2026 because staff had been busy. Resident 47 was admitted with no mental health diagnoses listed on the diagnosis list and the admission MDS documented the resident as cognitively intact with no mental health diagnoses or history. The PASRR Level I completed on admission stated there were no mental health diagnoses or concerns and that a Level II was not required. During review, the DON confirmed the diagnosis list did not show a mental health diagnosis, but the medication list included an antidepressant and an antianxiety medication, and the hospital discharge record showed a diagnosis of anxiety. The DON stated the resident had been admitted on both medications and the diagnoses should have been identified so a new PASRR could have been completed and submitted with the correct diagnoses.
Psychotropic medications lacked monitoring, justification, and documented non-drug interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were regularly monitored for side effects and target behaviors, and failed to provide justification for use and documentation that non-pharmaceutical interventions were attempted before psychotropic medications were used for three sampled residents. The facility policy stated psychotropic medications may be used only after non-drug approaches and interventions were attempted and that all medications should be monitored for harm and adverse consequences. Resident 22 had diagnoses including depression and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances and was severely cognitively impaired on the admission MDS. Physician orders showed quetiapine for dementia and trazodone for depression, but the record contained no documentation of target behavior monitoring for trazodone. The DNS reviewed the record and confirmed there was no target behavior monitoring in place or documented for the antidepressant medication. Resident 47 was cognitively intact and had no mental health diagnoses listed on the facility diagnosis list, although the hospital discharge record included anxiety. The resident was prescribed escitalopram routinely for anxiety and lorazepam as needed for anxiety. The DNS reviewed the record and confirmed the diagnosis list did not include a mental health diagnosis and said the diagnoses should have been listed with justification for use of the medications. Resident 12 had Alzheimer’s disease with behavior disturbances and anxiety disorder and was severely cognitively impaired, physically aggressive during care, and dependent on staff for activities of daily living. The care plan and physician orders directed staff to document agitation or anxiety episodes, behavioral interventions attempted, and outcomes before giving PRN risperidone, lorazepam, or haloperidol. The record showed multiple administrations of these medications before care, during agitation, or for anxiety, but the TARs did not document the episodes or behavioral interventions attempted. Staff also increased risperidone after discussing the resident’s grabbing during care, but the record showed staff had not analyzed the behavior patterns or reassessed which non-pharmacological interventions were effective before the increase.
Failure to Follow Up on PASRR Level 2 Evaluations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to coordinate and follow up on PASRR Level 2 evaluations for two residents with serious mental illness indicators. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility and had a Quarterly MDS showing the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with oral hygiene, dressing, and showering. Resident 3’s PASRR, dated 07/03/2025, checked serious mental illness indicators for psychotic disorder, depressive disorder, delusion disorder, and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, and the Level 2 evaluation referral was checked. However, the EHR contained no Level 2 evaluation, and a progress note documented that a request for Level II PASRR review was emailed to Acentra Health on the resident. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility and had an Annual MDS showing the resident was cognitively intact and needed setup to supervision assistance with hygiene and dressing and partial to moderate assistance with bathing. Resident 4’s PASRR, dated 04/30/2025, checked serious mental illness indicators for major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder, and the Level 2 evaluation referral was checked. The EHR showed no Level 2 evaluation. Staff stated they had not received an invalidation, that an email was sent to the state, and that the resident was in the queue for an evaluation. The Administrator stated there had been follow-up in July 2025 for Resident 4 but no follow-up since, and that follow-up should have occurred to ensure the resident remained on the list for a Level 2 evaluation.
Call Light and Water Left Out of Reach
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary ADL assistance for Resident 3, who was admitted to the facility and assessed on the Quarterly MDS as cognitively intact and needing set-up or clean-up assistance with eating. During interview, Resident 3 said they sometimes could not reach their call light and had to wait when that happened. Resident 3 also said they needed staff help to drink and sometimes had to wait for a drink, adding that they were told they were dehydrated and wanted to drink more. During observation, Resident 3 was found in bed with the call light hanging down the side of the bed from the bed rail and out of reach, and the water container with a straw was placed at the far edge of the bedside table and also out of reach. When Resident 3 awoke, they said they could not reach the call light. A CNA then helped Resident 3 drink water, and an LPN moved the call light into Resident 3's lap after being asked where it should be placed. The DON stated staff should ensure the resident's call light and water were within reach before leaving the room and said she would add that instruction to the care plan.
Failure to Prevent New Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing was not met for one resident who was severely cognitively impaired, had communication deficits, and was at risk for pressure ulcers. The resident was admitted with two Stage 2 pressure ulcers that were documented as healed shortly after admission, and the quarterly MDS later documented no pressure ulcers at the time of assessment. The skin integrity care plan noted use of an air overlay mattress, and wound documentation showed a Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left ischium that was dry, intact, flaky, and appearing to heal, followed by a healed Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the right ischium. Later in the stay, the resident developed two new Stage 1 pressure ulcers on the central coccyx and left coccyx, with barrier cream and an air mattress documented in the treatment plan. Within three days, progress notes documented that both areas had opened and were now two new Stage 2 pressure ulcers. The wound observation tools documented the central coccyx wound measuring 2 cm by 1 cm and the left coccyx wound measuring .5 cm by .3 cm by .1 cm. A nutrition note later documented the resident was receiving house nourishments three times daily for weight gain and skin healing of the coccyx, and the DON stated the resident had admitted with two Stage 2 pressure ulcers that healed shortly after arrival and later developed two Stage 1 pressure ulcers that progressed to two Stage 2 pressure ulcers.
Failure to Reassess Nutritional Interventions for Resident With Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to reassess and update nutritional interventions for a resident who experienced significant weight loss. Resident 6 was admitted on a regular diet with thin liquids and finger foods when available. The record showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had communication deficits, and by the quarterly MDS was documented with a 5% weight loss and not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. Over the following months, the resident’s weight declined from 108 lbs to 90.8 lbs, a 15.93% loss in about five months. The record showed the resident continued to receive nutritional supplements, but the orders changed only in product name and volume range and remained essentially the same support throughout the period. The EHR did not document a change in diet type to nutritionally enhanced meals, fortified foods, or calorie-dense meals, and no food preference evaluations had been completed. Meal documentation showed the resident usually ate only 0-25% of meals, while snacks were limited and were often consumed when offered. Mini Nutritional Assessments documented worsening intake and weight loss, including one assessment identifying malnutrition, but no follow-up or recommendations were documented. The care plan, revised by the DON, identified the resident as at risk for unavoidable fluctuations/loss related to continued decline in health status and included interventions such as dining hall encouragement, supervision, oral care, and diet as ordered. However, it did not document food preferences or alternate interventions for weight gain. Staff interviews confirmed the resident liked sweets, chips, ice cream, soup in a mug, sandwiches, and cookies, but these preferences were not documented in the EHR. Staff also confirmed the resident’s supplements had not been increased beyond the same general range since admission and could not identify additional nutritional interventions that had been implemented for the resident’s continued weight loss.
Failure to Assess and Document Potential Physical Restraints
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that potential physical restraints, specifically beds positioned against the wall and the use of mobility bars, were properly assessed, care planned, and documented for three residents. For one resident who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting and dressing, the bed was observed against the wall without a physical restraint evaluation or care plan in place. Staff confirmed that there was no assessment or care plan for this setup, and acknowledged that these should have been completed. Another resident with a right femur fracture and moderate cognitive impairment was observed with both their bed against the wall and a mobility bar attached, but there was no documentation of a restraint evaluation for either device. Staff interviews confirmed that assessments and orders were missing for these arrangements. A third resident, who had dementia, depression, anxiety, and muscle weakness, also had their bed against the wall without a completed restraint assessment or care plan. Staff interviews consistently indicated that restraint assessments and consents were expected but not completed for these residents.
Failure to Provide and Document Non-Pharmacological Interventions and Adhere to Medication Parameters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary medications by not providing or documenting non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering pain medications, not following medication parameters, and not reassessing the necessity of medications when abnormal vital signs were present. For one resident who was cognitively intact and receiving opioid medication for pain, physician orders required non-pharmacological interventions such as repositioning and diversional activities before medication administration. However, medication and treatment records showed no documentation that these interventions were offered or completed, and staff confirmed that this documentation was missing. Another cognitively intact resident with congestive heart failure had orders for Oxycodone with specific pain level parameters and required non-pharmacological interventions before administration. The medication administration record showed that higher doses were given for pain levels below the ordered threshold, and there was no documentation that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to medication administration. Additionally, this resident was on multiple antihypertensive medications and diuretics, but there were no parameters in place for holding these medications despite documented low blood pressure readings. A third resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired, had orders for hydromorphone for severe pain with instructions to attempt non-pharmacological interventions first. The medication was administered for pain scores below the ordered threshold, and there was no documentation of non-pharmacological interventions. This resident also received a diuretic despite low blood pressure readings, without provider notification or reassessment. Staff interviews confirmed that expectations for documentation and adherence to medication parameters were not met in these cases.
Failure to Refer Residents with Serious Mental Illness for Level 2 PASRR Evaluation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain updated Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments for two residents who had diagnoses of significant mental illness. One resident was admitted with Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder, and their Level 1 PASRR indicated serious mental illness, but no referral for a Level 2 PASRR was made. Another resident was admitted with major depressive disorder, and their Level 1 PASRR also indicated a serious mental illness, yet no Level 2 PASRR referral was placed. These findings were confirmed through interviews and record reviews, where the Social Services Director acknowledged that referrals for Level 2 PASRR evaluations should have been made according to updated regulatory guidance. The deficiency was identified through review of resident records and staff interviews, which showed that the required coordination with the PASRR program and appropriate referrals for further mental health assessment were not completed for residents with identified serious mental illness.
Failure to Individualize and Update Resident Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, individualized care plans for several residents, as evidenced by direct observations, staff interviews, and record reviews. For one resident with rectal cancer and chronic diarrhea, the care plan did not address the chronic diarrhea or the resident's refusals of prescribed medications for this condition. Additionally, the same resident required assistance with oral hygiene due to being bedbound and visually impaired, but there was no care plan in place for oral hygiene needs. Another resident, who was cognitively intact, had their bed positioned against the wall, but this intervention was not included in their care plan. Similarly, a resident with chronic heart failure who was receiving a diuretic and had documented edema did not have care plan interventions addressing diuretic use or edema management. A further resident, also cognitively intact and missing natural teeth, did not have this dental issue addressed in their care plan, despite expressing a desire to see a dentist. Additionally, a resident with dementia, depression, anxiety, and muscle weakness had a physician's order for their bed to be placed against the wall to increase environmental space, but this was not reflected in their care plan. Staff interviews confirmed that these omissions were not in line with facility expectations and that the care plans should have included these resident-specific interventions.
Failure to Meet Professional Standards in Weight Monitoring, Medication Documentation, Hospice Recommendations, and Change of Status Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of practice in several areas. For one resident with congestive heart failure, there was a physician order for daily weights to monitor for fluid retention, with instructions to report significant weight changes to the provider. However, the resident's weight record showed that weights were only recorded on two occasions over a two-week period, with multiple days missing. Staff acknowledged that weights were not consistently obtained and that there was no documentation of provider notification when weights could not be taken, as required by the order. Additionally, the same resident had an order for Trazodone with instructions to monitor and document side effects every shift. Staff documented positive side effects on several dates but failed to write corresponding progress notes as required. The Resident Care Manager confirmed that positive side effects were likely documented in error and that there was no supporting documentation in the progress notes for those dates. For another resident receiving hospice care for oral cancer, hospice recommended the application of A&D ointment to oral lesions to prevent drying and cracking. This recommendation was not transcribed into the provider orders, and there was no documentation or order for wound care to the cancer lesions. Staff interviews confirmed that only pain management and oral care were being provided, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the hospice recommendations were not reviewed, reported, or transcribed as expected. In a separate case, a resident readmitted after hospitalization for a gastrointestinal bleed and pneumonia was not placed on alert charting as required after a change in status, and staff confirmed that this monitoring should have occurred.
Failure to Provide Oral Care Assistance to Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary oral care assistance to two dependent residents, resulting in poor oral hygiene. One resident, who required supervision or assistance for oral hygiene and was visually impaired and unable to get out of bed, reported not having brushed their teeth in two months and only being offered help once. Observations confirmed yellow teeth with a whitish substance near the gums, and staff interviews revealed that oral care was not included in the resident's care plan, Kardex, or orders. Staff acknowledged that oral care should have been provided and documented, but it was not, and supplies were not made accessible to the resident. Another resident, dependent on staff for set up or clean-up assistance for oral hygiene and unable to get out of bed, did not have oral care supplies in their room and had not been observed performing oral care recently. Staff interviews indicated that oral care was not happening daily and there was no designated place for staff to document oral care. The care plan identified dental care as a concern and required staff to provide set up assistance after meals, but this was not consistently implemented, and supplies were not readily available.
Medication Storage and Labeling Deficiencies Identified
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple deficiencies related to the storage and labeling of medications. On B Hall, a medication cart was found to contain an open insulin pen that was not dated, and the registered nurse present admitted to opening it that morning and forgetting to date it. The resident care manager confirmed that all insulin should be dated upon opening. Additionally, the medication room's refrigerator temperature log for March was missing documentation for 11 out of 62 required checks, despite the refrigerator being used to store medications and emergency supplies. The resident care manager stated that temperatures should be monitored and logged twice daily by nursing staff. Further observations revealed a cup with food items, partially covered with a paper towel, left on top of the B Hall medication cart, with crumbs present and several nurses nearby who did not intervene. The director of nursing services acknowledged that refrigerator temperatures should have been documented at assigned times and that food should not have been left on the medication cart, confirming these practices did not meet facility expectations.
Failure to Maintain Dishwasher Temperatures and Adhere to PPE Protocols in Food Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food service staff adhered to required personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols and that the dishwasher operated within the necessary temperature ranges for proper sanitization. Specifically, the Dietary Manager was observed multiple times in the kitchen without a hair restraint, despite facility policy requiring dietary staff to wear hairnets, hats, or beard restraints to prevent hair from contacting food. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the expectation for hair to be covered in the kitchen and confirmed the observations of non-compliance. Additionally, a review of dishwasher temperature logs for January, February, and March revealed repeated failures to meet the required wash and rinse cycle temperatures for effective sanitization. The logs showed numerous instances where both the wash cycle (required minimum 150°F) and rinse cycle (required minimum 180°F) temperatures were not achieved across all meal periods. During an observed test run, the dishwasher again failed to reach the necessary temperatures. The Dietary Manager confirmed awareness of the ongoing temperature issues and acknowledged that the dishwasher often required multiple cycles to reach the correct temperature.
Infection Control Failures in Oxygen Equipment, Hand Hygiene, PPE, and Laundry Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store and handle oxygen equipment for a resident receiving oxygen therapy. During an observation, a staff member removed the resident's nasal cannula and placed it on the floor, then later picked it up and stored it on the oxygen concentrator without cleaning the equipment or the machine. Facility leadership confirmed that oxygen tubing should be stored in a clean bag and the concentrator should be wiped down before replacing equipment, and acknowledged that the observed actions did not follow protocol. Staff failed to perform hand hygiene during dining services, as observed with an activity assistant who repeatedly touched her eyeglasses, handled linens, food trays, and other items without performing hand hygiene between tasks. The dietary manager and infection preventionist both confirmed that hand hygiene should be performed after touching oneself or personal items and before serving food, and that the observed practices did not meet expectations or policy. The facility also did not ensure proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). A certified nursing assistant provided catheter care to a resident on EBP without wearing a gown and did not perform hand hygiene with every glove change. Additionally, laundry services were observed to have an open linen cart in the hallway with dirty hangers placed on top, and staff did not perform hand hygiene between handling dirty and clean items. Facility leadership confirmed that clean and dirty items should not be stored together and that the linen cart should remain closed except when in use in a resident room.
Failure to Verify Nurse Aide Registry for CNA
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nursing assistants were properly screened through the nurse aide registry before providing care to residents. This deficiency was identified for one of the two staff members reviewed for qualifications, specifically Staff B. Staff B was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant on July 30, 2024, but their employee record lacked documentation from the nurse aide registry. On August 12, 2024, the facility's Administrator, Staff A, confirmed that Staff B was actively working as a nursing assistant without verification from the nurse aide registry. Staff A mentioned that they had sent another email to the registry requesting verification, but it had not yet been received. This oversight placed residents at risk for abuse and unmet care needs.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 84 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Port Townsend
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency Coupeville Rehab And Nursing Center | 8.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of Sequim | 15.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 29 | 0 |
| Sequim Bay Post Acute | 16.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Josephine Caring Community | 20.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 28 | 0 |
| Martha And Mary Health Service | 26.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Life Care Center Of Port Townsend.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.