Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Wylie Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses did not consistently receive showers, bed baths, or nail care due to lack of documentation, unclear responsibility between facility and hospice staff, and poor communication. Observations confirmed the resident had poor hygiene and long, dirty fingernails, and staff interviews revealed that refusals and care provided were not properly documented or communicated.
A resident with COPD did not have their nebulizer mask stored in a bag when not in use, as observed by surveyors. Staff interviews confirmed the mask should have been bagged to prevent contamination, but the facility's policy did not specify storage procedures for respiratory items.
A nurse failed to monitor a resident with multiple chronic conditions and falsely documented vital signs after the resident had already died. The resident was found unresponsive and in rigor mortis by staff during a routine medication pass, and emergency responders confirmed death had occurred prior to the nurse's claimed assessment. The nurse later admitted to not checking on the resident and to entering incorrect documentation, in violation of facility policy requiring regular resident checks.
A facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for a resident, leading to an incorrect documentation of a rash by a CNA. The resident, with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain, had no skin issues noted in nursing notes or during discharge assessment. Interviews revealed the CNA may have made a documentation error, and the facility lacked a policy to address such inaccuracies.
The facility failed to securely store medications for three residents, including multivitamins, Benadryl cream, and zinc oxide, which were left accessible on side tables. This oversight involved residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment, posing risks of accidental ingestion or misuse. Staff acknowledged the failure to adhere to the facility's medication management policy, which requires medications to be stored in locked compartments.
A facility failed to create a specific baseline care plan for a newly admitted resident with dementia and hyperlipidemia within 48 hours, as required. The care plan template was completed but lacked individualized instructions. Staff believed there was no risk due to access to admission orders, but this oversight risked continuity of care and resident safety.
A facility failed to conduct a weekly skin assessment for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers, despite the resident's complaints of pain and suspected skin issues. The RN responsible admitted to completing the assessment but not documenting it. The facility's policy required weekly skin checks, and both the DON and Administrator acknowledged the importance of these assessments to prevent untreated skin issues.
The facility failed to provide effective pain management for two residents, leading to unnecessary pain and suffering. One resident experienced a fall and showed signs of pain, but was not given PRN pain medication until days later, despite having a fracture. Another resident had his pain medication reduced without his knowledge, leading to increased pain and anxiety. The facility's inadequate pain management placed residents at risk for prolonged pain and decreased quality of life.
The facility failed to address repeated grievances from the Resident Council regarding the lack of variety in food and dessert options. Despite the Activity Director communicating these concerns to the Administrator and Dietary Manager, no actions were taken to resolve the issues, and the concerns were not filed as formal grievances. Observations confirmed that menu items did not meet residents' expectations, impacting their quality of life.
The facility failed to ensure proper respiratory care for residents, with issues such as nasal cannulas and breathing masks not being changed weekly or stored correctly. A resident's nasal cannula was found on the floor, while others had equipment improperly stored, risking contamination and infection.
The facility failed to provide palatable and correctly prepared meals for residents on a puree diet, with issues such as incorrect puree bread consistency and lack of seasoning observed over two days. The Dietary Manager and Regional Dietician acknowledged the need for improved staff training on puree consistency and adherence to food safety protocols.
The facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program, as CNAs did not perform proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for three residents. Observations revealed that CNAs did not sanitize hands between glove changes, risking cross-contamination. Despite recent training, these lapses were acknowledged by staff, highlighting a deficiency in infection control measures.
Two residents with severe cognitive and physical impairments were found with their call lights out of reach, posing a risk to their safety. Staff members acknowledged the importance of accessible call lights, and the facility's policy supported this requirement.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer's and dysphagia, was found to have an inadequate care plan that did not reflect his need for assistance with hydration. Despite being at risk for dehydration, the care plan only included keeping fluids available, which was insufficient as the resident could not drink independently. The DON and ADON recognized the care plan's inadequacy during an interview.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer's and dysphagia, did not receive adequate oral care or hydration. Observations showed dry, cracked lips and a paste-like substance on the resident's teeth, indicating insufficient oral hygiene. The care plan lacked specific interventions for oral care, and the facility's hydration policy was not effectively implemented, as the resident's care plan did not document hydration at specified intervals.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment reported that a hospice aide was rough and caused bruising. The facility failed to report the allegations to the State Survey Agency within the required 2-hour timeframe. Interviews revealed that the ADON did not document the incident, and the administrator and DON were not informed, leading to no investigation or self-report.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment reported that a hospice aide was rough and caused bruising. The ADON failed to document the incident, report it to the Administrator and DON, or initiate an investigation. The facility's policy on immediate reporting and investigation of abuse allegations was not followed, resulting in a deficiency.
Failure to Provide Consistent ADL Care and Hygiene for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) did not consistently receive necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and pain disorder, required substantial assistance with personal hygiene and bathing. Record reviews showed no documentation of showers, bed baths, or nail care being provided or refused, and there was no communication between the hospice agency and facility staff regarding these ADLs. During observation, the resident was found in bed with uncombed hair, an unpleasant body odor, facial hair growth, and long, dirty fingernails. The resident reported not receiving showers or bed baths for weeks and expressed a desire for improved hygiene and nail care. Interviews with CNAs and hospice aides revealed confusion and lack of clarity regarding responsibility for providing and documenting ADL care, with both facility and hospice staff assuming the other party was responsible. Neither group consistently reported refusals or lack of care to the charge nurse, and documentation was not shared between the hospice agency and the facility. Facility policies required collaborative communication between hospice and facility staff and mandated that all residents unable to perform ADLs independently receive necessary care. However, the lack of documentation, communication, and follow-through resulted in the resident not receiving regular showers, bed baths, or nail care, as observed and confirmed by staff and the resident herself.
Failure to Properly Store Nebulizer Mask for Resident with COPD
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident with COPD by not storing the resident's nebulizer mask in a bag when not in use. During observation, the nebulizer mask and tubing were found uncovered on top of a small refrigerator at the resident's bedside. Interviews with staff, including the ADON, DON, and an LVN, confirmed that the nebulizer mask should have been stored in a bag to prevent contamination and infection, but this was not done at the time of observation. Record review showed that the resident had a history of COPD and was prescribed nebulizer treatments as needed. The resident's care plan included interventions for breathing treatments, and physician orders specified the use of Albuterol Sulfate via nebulizer. Despite these orders and interventions, the facility's policy on small volume nebulizers did not address storage of respiratory items when not in use, contributing to the failure to maintain sanitary conditions for respiratory equipment.
Failure to Monitor Resident and Falsification of Documentation
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a registered nurse (RN) failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for a resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including a pacemaker, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, dementia, and other chronic illnesses. The RN did not monitor the resident as required and falsely documented vital signs during a timeframe in which the resident had already become deceased. The RN later admitted to not checking on the resident prior to being alerted by a certified medication aide (CMA) that the resident was unresponsive, and acknowledged that the vital signs entered were a mistake. Multiple staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that the RN did not check on the resident as documented. The CMA discovered the resident unresponsive during a routine medication pass, and other staff members, including licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) and certified nursing assistants (CNAs), responded to the emergency. Upon entering the room, staff noted the resident was unresponsive, cold to the touch, and stiff, with no detectable pulse. Emergency medical services (EMS) arrived and confirmed the resident was deceased, with rigor mortis present, indicating death had occurred prior to the time the RN claimed to have checked on the resident. Further investigation revealed that the RN had insisted to a police officer that the resident was alive when checked earlier, but this was contradicted by the physical findings and statements from other staff. The facility's policy required resident checks at the beginning of each shift and every two hours, but the RN failed to adhere to this policy and documented care that was not provided. The deficiency was determined to have placed the resident in an Immediate Jeopardy situation due to the failure to provide appropriate monitoring and accurate documentation.
Inaccurate Documentation of Resident's Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, specifically in the case of a resident whose medical records inaccurately documented a rash. The resident, an elderly female with a diagnosis including senile degeneration of the brain, was admitted to the facility. A point of care history form indicated a rash on the resident's buttocks, documented by a CNA during a night shift. However, nursing notes from the same period did not reflect any skin issues, and the Wound Care Nurse was not informed of any such condition. Interviews revealed that the CNA may have mistakenly documented the rash, as she did not recall the details and acknowledged the possibility of an error. The Wound Care Nurse confirmed that no skin issues were noted during the resident's discharge assessment. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator were unaware of the incorrect documentation until it was brought to their attention. The Administrator admitted that there was no specific policy addressing documentation errors, which could lead to residents receiving unnecessary care or missing needed care.
Medication Storage Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safe and secure storage of medications for several residents, leading to potential risks of accidental ingestion or misuse. Resident #1, a cognitively intact individual with dementia, had a bottle of One-A-Day multivitamins left on her side table without a physician's order or assessment for self-administration. The resident admitted to not taking the vitamins for almost two weeks, and the multivitamins were accessible to her and potentially to others. Resident #2, who had severe cognitive impairment due to dementia, had a tube of Benadryl cream on her side table without a physician's order or assessment for self-administration. The resident did not respond when asked about the use of the cream, indicating a lack of awareness or understanding of the medication's presence and purpose. LVN A, upon noticing the medications, acknowledged the oversight and the potential risks associated with leaving medications accessible. Resident #3, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and moderate cognitive impairment, had a container of zinc oxide on her side table. The zinc oxide was used for incontinence care, but it was not stored securely after use. CNA B recognized the risk of confusion and potential ingestion by the resident and took steps to secure the ointment. The facility's policy required medications to be stored in medication carts, and the DON and Administrator both acknowledged the failure to adhere to this policy, emphasizing the need for staff vigilance in preventing such occurrences.
Failure to Develop Individualized Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a newly admitted resident within 48 hours of admission, as required by professional standards of quality care. The resident, a female with dementia and hyperlipidemia, was admitted to the facility, but her baseline care plan lacked specific instructions tailored to her needs. The Assistant Director of Nursing completed a template for the baseline care plan, but it was not individualized for the resident. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both acknowledged that the care plan was not specific to the resident, although they believed there was no risk due to staff having access to admission orders. The facility's policy required that a baseline care plan be developed and initiated within 48 hours of admission to ensure effective and person-centered care. However, the care plan for the resident was not updated with specific details, and the resident's family decided to discharge her following a care plan meeting. Interviews with facility staff revealed a reliance on admission orders available in the point of care system, rather than a comprehensive, individualized care plan. This oversight placed newly admitted residents at risk of not being informed of their initial goals and services, potentially affecting continuity of care and resident safety.
Failure to Conduct Weekly Skin Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choice. Specifically, the facility did not complete a weekly skin assessment for a resident who was at risk for pressure ulcers due to poor bed mobility. The resident, a female with heart failure and dementia, was moderately cognitively impaired and had a care plan that included interventions to keep her skin dry and clean and to report any signs of skin breakdown. Interviews revealed that the resident experienced pain in her lower back and suspected a skin issue, but staff had not assessed her skin despite being aware of her complaints. The RN responsible for weekly skin assessments admitted to completing the assessment but failing to document it. Both the Director of Nursing and the Administrator confirmed that weekly skin assessments were required for all residents, and the facility's policy mandated these checks. The lack of documentation and failure to perform the assessment as required could lead to skin issues being overlooked and untreated.
Inadequate Pain Management for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide effective pain management for two residents, leading to unnecessary pain and suffering. One resident, an elderly female with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and stroke, experienced a fall. Despite showing signs of pain such as grimacing and screaming during movement, the facility did not adequately address her pain. The resident's care plan included monitoring for pain, but after her fall, she was not given any PRN pain medication until several days later. An x-ray eventually revealed a nondisplaced fracture, indicating the resident had been in significant pain that was not properly managed. Another resident, an elderly male with a history of chronic pain syndrome and multiple surgeries, experienced a reduction in his pain medication without his knowledge. This change led to increased pain and anxiety for the resident, who was accustomed to receiving oxycodone every four hours. The resident expressed that the facility staff did not understand his pain needs and that he experienced withdrawal symptoms when his medication was not administered as previously scheduled. Despite his complaints, the facility did not maintain his pain management regimen, resulting in unnecessary suffering. The facility's failure to manage pain effectively for these residents was identified as an immediate jeopardy situation, although it was later downgraded. The lack of timely and appropriate pain management interventions placed residents at risk for prolonged pain and decreased quality of life. The facility's documentation and communication with healthcare providers were insufficient, contributing to the inadequate pain management for these residents.
Failure to Address Resident Council Grievances on Food Variety
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consider and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the Resident Council concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. Over the course of three months, the Resident Council repeatedly expressed concerns about the lack of variety in the food and dessert menu, specifically requesting more fruit and dessert choices, such as pies, cakes, or brownies, and noted that cakes often lacked frosting. Despite these concerns being documented in the Resident Council minutes and communicated by the Activity Director (AD) to the Administrator and Dietary Manager, no actions were taken to address these issues. The Activity Director, who attended all Resident Council meetings, acknowledged the residents' concerns and communicated them during morning meetings with the Administrator and Dietary Manager. However, the AD did not file these concerns as grievances, believing they did not warrant such action. The Administrator and Dietary Manager were aware of the concerns but did not follow up or schedule a meeting with the Resident Council to address the issues. The Administrator considered the concerns as personal preferences rather than grievances, and thus did not prioritize them for resolution. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and Regional Dietician revealed a lack of communication and follow-up on the residents' feedback. The Dietary Manager was not notified of the concerns due to the absence of a formal grievance filing, and the Regional Dietician emphasized the importance of adhering to resident preferences for quality of life. Observations confirmed that the menu items, such as the frosted cake, did not meet the residents' expectations, as the cake often lacked visible frosting. The facility's policy required the Activities Director to follow up on the Council's concerns, but this was not effectively executed, leading to unresolved grievances and a potential decline in residents' quality of life.
Improper Storage and Maintenance of Respiratory Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide proper respiratory care for several residents, as observed during a survey. Resident #29, who was diagnosed with chronic respiratory failure and hypoxia, had a nasal cannula that was not changed weekly as required and was improperly stored. The nasal cannula was found on the seat of the resident's wheelchair and later fell to the floor, indicating a lack of adherence to infection control protocols. The nasal cannula was dated 04/25/2024, which was beyond the weekly change schedule. Resident #61, with a diagnosis of wheezing, also had issues with the storage of respiratory equipment. The nasal cannula was found coiled on the floor between the oxygen machine and the nightstand, not bagged as required. This improper storage was acknowledged by LVN G, who stated that the nasal cannula should be bagged and off the floor to prevent contamination. Resident #66 and Resident #71 also experienced similar deficiencies. Resident #66's nasal cannula was not bagged and was improperly stored on the oxygen concentrator and around the oxygen tank. Resident #71's breathing mask for nebulization was not bagged and was stored in a drawer, with the mask dated 04/25/2024, indicating it was not changed weekly. These observations highlight a pattern of non-compliance with the facility's policy on respiratory equipment storage and maintenance, potentially compromising the residents' respiratory care.
Deficiency in Meal Preparation for Puree Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide palatable and correctly prepared meals for residents on a puree diet during lunch on two consecutive days. Observations on the first day revealed that the puree bread was not in the correct form, being too thick and firm, which could pose a choking hazard. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that the puree bread's consistency was incorrect and noted that it became firmer as it sat in the warming rack. Additionally, the pureed vegetables were not smooth enough, and the food lacked seasoning, impacting its palatability. On the second day, similar issues were observed with the puree diet, where the puree bread was again too thick, and the puree tomato was not palatable. The Dietary Manager admitted that the frosting on the cake was inconsistent due to different preparation methods by the cooks. The Regional Dietician, who visits the facility twice a month, confirmed that the puree bread should have a smooth consistency and that the dietary staff needed education on achieving the correct puree consistency. The facility's food safety policy requires that food be stored to minimize contamination and bacterial growth, especially for Time/Temperature Control for Safety Foods. However, the Dietary Manager was unsure if milk, used in the puree bread, required temperature control for safety. The Regional Dietician emphasized the importance of maintaining the correct consistency for puree diets to prevent choking hazards, highlighting a need for better staff training and adherence to food safety protocols.
Inadequate Hand Hygiene Practices During Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program, as evidenced by the improper hand hygiene practices observed among Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) during incontinence care for three residents. These lapses in protocol were identified during observations and interviews, highlighting a significant deficiency in infection control measures. The CNAs did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes, which is a critical step in preventing cross-contamination and the spread of infections. For Resident #16, CNA C did not sanitize her hands between changing gloves while providing incontinence care. Although she washed her hands before and after the procedure, the lack of hand hygiene between glove changes was acknowledged by CNA C as a potential risk for cross-contamination. Similarly, CNA E, while attending to Resident #42, failed to change gloves and sanitize hands before handling a new pull-up, despite having attended an in-service on hand hygiene two weeks prior. CNA D, who was responsible for Resident #50, did not wash her hands before starting incontinence care and neglected to sanitize her hands between glove changes after cleaning the resident. This oversight was recognized by CNA D, who admitted to having sanitizer available but forgetting to use it. Interviews with the RN, ADON, and DON confirmed the importance of proper hand hygiene to prevent infection, yet these practices were not consistently followed by the staff.
Inaccessible Call Lights for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the call light system was accessible to two residents, leading to a deficiency in accommodating their needs and preferences. Resident #15, a female with severe cognitive impairment and physical limitations, was found unable to reach her call light, which was on the floor and under her bed. This resident required extensive assistance for daily activities and had a history of falls, making the accessibility of the call light crucial for her safety. During an observation, the resident expressed difficulty in locating the call light, and a CNA admitted to not ensuring it was within reach after providing care. Similarly, Resident #61, a male with severe cognitive impairment and physical disabilities due to a stroke, was also found with his call light out of reach, on the floor between the bed and nightstand. This resident required extensive assistance for mobility and was experiencing a severe leg cramp at the time of observation, yet was unable to call for help. Both a CNA and an LVN acknowledged the importance of having the call light within reach and corrected the situation by placing it next to the resident. Interviews with various staff members, including the RN, ADON, DON, and Administrator, confirmed the expectation that call lights should always be within reach of residents. They emphasized the call light's role as a critical communication tool for residents to request assistance or alert staff in emergencies. The facility's policy also supported this requirement, highlighting the staff's responsibility to ensure call lights are accessible when leaving a resident's room.
Inadequate Care Plan for Resident with Severe Impairments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the care plan for a resident was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. The resident, a male with severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, malnutrition, dysphagia, and Down Syndrome, was dependent on staff for oral care and nutrition. Despite being at risk for dehydration, the care plan only included the intervention to keep fluids available, which was not appropriate given the resident's inability to drink fluids independently. An observation revealed that the resident was unable to drink fluids on his own and required assistance from a CNA to consume nectar-thickened liquids and to be fed his meal. During an interview, the DON and ADON acknowledged that the care plan was not suitable for the resident's needs, as it did not account for his inability to drink independently. The facility's policy on person-centered care plans emphasizes the resident's right to participate in the development and implementation of their care plan, which was not adequately fulfilled in this case.
Failure to Provide Adequate Oral Care and Hydration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary oral hygiene care to a resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living independently. The resident, a male with severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, malnutrition, dysphagia, and Down Syndrome, was dependent on staff for oral care and nutrition. Observations revealed that the resident had dry, cracked lips and a paste-like substance on his teeth, indicating inadequate oral care. The resident's care plan did not include specific interventions for oral hygiene, despite the resident's need for extensive assistance. Additionally, the facility did not ensure the resident received sufficient fluids to maintain hydration. Observations showed that the resident had only consumed a small amount of thickened water, and staff acknowledged the importance of providing adequate fluids. The facility's policy on hydration for residents with swallowing disorders was not effectively implemented, as the resident's care plan lacked documentation for hydration at specified intervals. The Director of Nursing admitted that oral care was supposed to be performed every shift and recognized the need for a specific care plan to address the resident's oral hygiene needs.
Failure to Report Allegations of Abuse in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report allegations of abuse involving a resident within the required timeframe. Resident #1, a male with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and stroke, reported that a hospice aide was rough with him and caused bruising. The incident was documented by hospice staff, who noted multiple bruises on the resident's arms and hands. Despite this, the facility did not report the allegations to the State Survey Agency within the mandated 2-hour window. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed that she did not recall receiving any complaints about the hospice staff being rough or causing bruises. The ADON stated that if there were concerns of abuse, she would have notified the administrator. However, the ADON did not document her conversation with the hospice field staff, and the administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were not made aware of the allegations. Consequently, no investigation or self-report was completed. The facility's policy mandates immediate reporting of any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment to the administrator and other officials, including the State Survey Agency. The failure to adhere to this policy resulted in the incident not being reported as required, potentially placing residents at risk for injuries, abuse, and neglect.
Failure to Investigate and Report Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation and prevention of further abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment in response to allegations made by a resident. Resident #1, an elderly male with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions, reported that a hospice aide was rough with him and caused bruising. Despite the resident's complaint and visible bruises, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) did not document the incident properly or report it to the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) as required by the facility's policy. The ADON also failed to initiate an investigation or complete a self-report regarding the alleged abuse. Interviews with the resident, ADON, and hospice staff revealed inconsistencies in the handling of the complaint. The resident described the incident in detail, mentioning multiple bruises on his arms caused by the hospice aide. However, the ADON claimed she did not recall receiving any complaints about the hospice staff being rough and did not document her conversation with the hospice field staff. The Administrator and DON were unaware of the allegations and the bruises, and no investigation or self-report was completed. The facility's policy mandates immediate reporting and investigation of any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. The failure to follow these procedures and the lack of documentation and communication among staff members resulted in the deficiency. This oversight could place residents at risk for further injuries, abuse, and neglect.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 832 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 31 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Wylie
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garnet Hill Rehabilitation And Skilled Care | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Rowlett Health And Rehabilitation Center | 7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Beacon Harbor Healthcare And Rehabilitation | 7.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Rockwall Nursing Care Center | 7.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 1 |
| Pleasant Valley Healthcare And Rehabilitation Cent | 7.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Wylie Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.