Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Whispering Oaks Rehab & Nursing during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A nurse left a tablet displaying a resident's medication administration record open and visible on a medication cart in a hallway, exposing protected health information to others. The nurse acknowledged the lapse and confirmed prior training on resident rights, while the DON verified that such information is protected and staff receive regular privacy training.
A CNA was observed providing perineal care to a resident with multiple medical conditions using a back to front wiping motion, which is contrary to facility policy and infection control standards that require front to back cleaning. The CNA believed she was using the correct technique despite having received training and passing a competency check. The DON confirmed the correct procedure and that staff are trained and monitored annually.
A CNA failed to use the correct front-to-back technique during incontinent care for a resident with multiple medical conditions, despite having received training and passing a recent competency check. The improper technique was observed and confirmed by both the CNA and the DON, and was not in accordance with facility policy or infection control standards.
A treatment cart containing wound care supplies, ointments, creams, dressings, and scissors was left unlocked and unattended by an RN while providing wound care. The ADON later secured the cart. Interviews confirmed that staff were aware of the policy requiring carts to be locked when not in use, and the facility's policy mandates that all drugs and biologicals be stored in locked compartments accessible only to authorized personnel.
The facility did not adequately protect resident-identifiable information or maintain medical records according to professional standards, as observed by surveyors.
A CNA failed to sanitize hands after touching a privacy curtain, considered a contaminated object, before donning gloves and providing incontinent care to a resident with multiple medical conditions. This action was contrary to facility policy and infection control training, as confirmed by the DON.
Therapeutic diets were not prescribed by the attending physician or properly delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian as allowed by State law, resulting in dietary orders lacking required authorization.
Surveyors found that all two-bed resident rooms in the facility provided less than the required 80 square feet per resident, with measurements showing only 77.5 to 78.5 square feet per bed. This was confirmed through record review, direct observation, and staff interview, affecting all residents in these rooms and potentially limiting space for care equipment and personal belongings.
Food was served to residents from a walk-in refrigerator that repeatedly recorded temperatures in the danger zone over several days. Staff did not consistently discard food stored at improper temperatures, and there was a lack of documentation and communication regarding the issue. Residents, including those with compromised immune systems, consumed food that may have been improperly stored, though no significant GI symptoms were reported during the period.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for three residents, leading to care deficiencies. A resident's MDS did not reflect a suprapubic catheter, another's significant weight loss was not documented, and a third's therapeutic diet was not recorded. These errors were confirmed by staff and affected care plans and facility reimbursement.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two residents, one with dental issues and another with a Jejunostomy feeding tube. The care plans did not address the residents' specific needs, such as dental care and proper tube flushing techniques, despite the facility's guidelines requiring individualized care plans. This deficiency risks inadequate care for the residents.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect bowel incontinence, despite the resident's MDS assessment indicating incontinence of both bowel and bladder. The resident, with Alzheimer's and dementia, was dependent on staff for ADLs. Interviews with staff revealed the care plan had not been reviewed since a new CMM took over, underscoring a lapse in updating care plans post-assessment.
A resident with a suprapubic catheter was observed with their urinary drainage bag touching the floor, and without a leg strap to secure the catheter tubing, contrary to facility policy. This deficiency in care placed the resident at risk for urinary tract infections and potential injury. The resident had a history of cerebrovascular disease and dementia, with severe cognitive impairment.
A facility failed to follow its policy for checking a Jejunostomy feeding tube placement, risking complications for a resident. The policy required visual comparison of tube markings, but an LVN used auscultation, which was not part of the policy. The resident, with a history of hemiplegia and dysphagia, did not report discomfort, but the LVN admitted to not knowing the correct procedure and needing more training.
A resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was observed receiving oxygen at 3.0 Lpm instead of the physician-ordered 2.0 Lpm. The resident believed the higher level was correct due to the setup by nurses. An LVN admitted to not checking the oxygen level due to being busy, and the DON confirmed the oversight, highlighting a failure to follow the facility's policy on verifying physician orders.
A facility failed to ensure an LVN followed the correct procedure for checking a Jejunostomy feeding tube, as per facility policy. The LVN used auscultation instead of visual comparison of tube markings, which was not part of the facility's protocol. The resident involved, who had multiple medical conditions, did not report discomfort. The LVN admitted to not knowing the policy and expressed a need for further training.
A facility failed to secure medication and treatment carts, leaving them unattended in a hallway. LVN A left the carts unsecured while preparing for a resident's wound treatment, with other staff present nearby. The ADON later secured the carts after being informed by a surveyor. Interviews confirmed the importance of securing the carts to prevent unauthorized access, aligning with the facility's medication storage policy.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, as evidenced by improper handling of a urinary catheter drainage bag by a CNA, allowing it to touch the floor, and an LVN's failure to adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions during wound care. These lapses in infection control practices could lead to cross-contamination and infections among residents.
A resident's wheelchair had torn and sharp vinyl armrests, posing a safety risk. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required a manual wheelchair, reported scratches from the damage but did not inform staff. Facility staff were unaware of the issue, indicating a lapse in equipment maintenance responsibilities.
The facility failed to provide the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 44 two-bed rooms, with measurements showing only 77.5 to 78.5 square feet per bed. The Administrator confirmed the deficiency and requested a room size waiver.
Failure to Protect Resident Health Information Privacy
Penalty
Summary
A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) failed to maintain the privacy of a resident's protected health information while administering medications. During the medication pass, the LVN left her tablet open on the medication cart in a hallway, displaying the resident's electronic medical record, including the medication administration record and the resident's name. This screen was visible to other staff and residents passing by. The LVN acknowledged that the information was exposed and admitted she should have locked the screen to prevent unauthorized viewing. She also confirmed that she had received training on resident rights within the past year. The resident involved had a history of hyperlipidemia, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, osteoporosis, and anxiety, and was severely cognitively impaired, requiring total assistance with activities of daily living. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the medication administration record is protected information and that staff are trained at least annually on resident rights, including privacy. Facility policy requires adherence to HIPAA standards and prohibits the release of resident-identifiable medical information to the public.
Improper Perineal Care Technique During Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
A certified nursing assistant (CNA) provided incontinent care to a resident with a history of traumatic brain injury, dysphagia, hypertension, and congenital hydrocephalus, who was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and had moderate cognitive impairment. During care, the CNA was observed wiping the resident's buttocks in a back to front motion, contrary to the facility's policy and standard infection control practices, which require cleaning from front to back to prevent contamination of the urethra. The CNA confirmed using the incorrect technique and stated she believed it was correct, despite having received training and passing a competency check on perineal care earlier in the year. The Director of Nursing (DON) verified that staff are trained and their skills are checked annually, and that the correct technique is front to back. The facility's policy also specifies this method for perineal care. This improper care practice was identified through observation, interview, and record review.
Improper Incontinent Care Technique by CNA
Penalty
Summary
Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C failed to use the correct technique while providing incontinent care to Resident #4, as observed during care. Specifically, CNA C was seen wiping the resident's buttocks in a back to front motion, contrary to the facility's policy and standard infection control practices, which require wiping from front to back. CNA C confirmed during an interview that she believed she was using the correct technique and stated she had received training on incontinent care from the facility. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the correct method is front to back to prevent contamination and that staff receive annual training and skills checks. Resident #4 had a history of traumatic brain injury, dysphagia, hypertension, and congenital hydrocephalus, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, requiring assistance with care. The resident's care plan included frequent checks for wetness and soiling, with changes as needed. Despite passing a competency check for perineal care earlier in the year, CNA C did not demonstrate the required skill during the observed incident. Facility policy and staff competency requirements were reviewed and confirmed to specify the correct technique.
Unattended Unlocked Treatment Cart Containing Medications and Supplies
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a registered nurse (RN) left a treatment cart unlocked and unattended while providing wound care to residents. The cart, which contained wound care supplies, ointments, creams, dressings, and a pair of scissors, was observed to be out of the RN's sight and not secured. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) later noticed the cart and locked it. Both the ADON and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that facility policy requires treatment carts to be locked when not in use, and that staff are trained on this requirement to prevent unauthorized access and potential drug diversion. Interviews with the RN, ADON, and DON confirmed awareness of the policy and the expectation that carts remain locked when unattended. The RN acknowledged forgetting to lock the cart while providing care. Review of the facility's medication storage policy further confirmed that all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, with access limited to authorized personnel.
Failure to Safeguard Resident Information and Maintain Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or did not maintain medical records for each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards. This deficiency was identified through surveyor observation or review, indicating that the required protocols for protecting confidential information and proper record-keeping were not consistently followed. No additional details about specific residents, their medical history, or the exact circumstances of the deficiency are provided in the report.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene After Contact with Contaminated Object During Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
During the provision of incontinent care for a resident with a history of traumatic brain injury, dysphagia, hypertension, and congenital hydrocephalus, a CNA failed to follow proper infection control procedures. After washing her hands, the CNA touched the privacy curtain to close it and did not sanitize her hands before putting on gloves and starting care. The CNA later confirmed she did not sanitize her hands after touching the curtain, believing it to be clean, despite having received training on incontinent care and infection control from the facility. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the privacy curtain is considered dirty and that staff are required to sanitize their hands after touching it and before donning gloves. The facility's policy on hand hygiene specifies that hand hygiene must be performed after handling contaminated objects and before applying personal protective equipment, including gloves. Review of the CNA's annual skills check indicated she had passed competency for perineal care and infection control earlier in the year.
Therapeutic Diets Not Properly Authorized
Penalty
Summary
Therapeutic diets were not consistently prescribed by the attending physician, nor was there documentation that the responsibility for prescribing these diets was appropriately delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian as permitted by State law. This resulted in a failure to ensure that dietary orders for residents requiring therapeutic diets were authorized in accordance with regulatory requirements. The deficiency centers on the lack of proper authorization for therapeutic diets, with no mention of specific residents or their medical conditions in the report.
Resident Rooms Below Minimum Square Footage Requirement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that 44 out of 44 resident rooms met the required minimum of 80 square feet of floor space per resident in multiple occupancy rooms. Measurements taken by the Life Safety Code surveyor using a laser measuring tool revealed that the two-bed resident rooms ranged from 155 to 157 square feet, resulting in only 77.5 to 78.5 square feet per bed. This was confirmed through a review of the facility's Bed Classification Form and direct observation of the rooms across multiple halls, including rooms 100 through 108, 201 through 207, 300 through 305, 401 through 404, 500 through 509, and 600 through 608. During an interview, the Administrator acknowledged that these rooms did not provide the required minimum space per resident. The deficiency was identified through a combination of record review, direct measurement, and staff interview, confirming that all two-person rooms in the facility were affected by this issue. The report notes that this situation could restrict the amount of resident care equipment and personal effects that could be accommodated in these rooms.
Improper Food Storage and Service Due to Refrigerator Temperature Failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions, as required by professional standards. Over several days, the walk-in refrigerator recorded temperatures in the danger zone, with logs showing readings as high as 70°F and multiple instances above 50°F. Despite these out-of-range temperatures, food from the refrigerator, including milk, bacon, sausage, and eggs, was served to residents. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about whether food was discarded during the periods of improper refrigeration, and there was no documentation of individual food item temperatures being checked during the affected days. Multiple staff members, including the Administrator, DON, Dietician, and Food Service Supervisor (FSS), were either unaware of the refrigerator's malfunction or did not take appropriate action to ensure food safety. The FSS and dietary staff indicated that food was served from the refrigerator during the days with danger zone temperature readings, and there was no evidence that food was discarded until after the refrigerator was repaired. The facility's policy required discarding food stored at improper temperatures, but this was not consistently followed. Additionally, the Dietician was not notified of the refrigerator issue, and staff had not received training on danger zone temperatures or corrective actions until after the surveyor's entrance. Residents with compromised immune systems and other vulnerabilities were among those who consumed food potentially stored at unsafe temperatures. Interviews with residents indicated that they ate the food provided and did not report significant gastrointestinal symptoms during the week in question. However, the lack of proper food storage and handling placed all residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness, as identified by the surveyors.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments Lead to Care Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for three residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident #5's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment did not accurately reflect the presence of a suprapubic catheter, which was confirmed during interviews with the Care Management Manager (CMM) and the Director of Nursing (DON). This oversight was significant as the MDS is crucial for guiding resident care. Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment failed to document a significant weight loss, despite evidence from her weight log and nutrition assessment indicating a 23.64% weight loss due to starting hemodialysis. Interviews with the resident and staff confirmed the weight loss and the resident's refusal of the recommended nutritional supplement, Nepro. The CMM acknowledged the error in the MDS coding, which should have indicated the weight loss. Resident #42's MDS assessment was incorrectly coded, failing to reflect that the resident had received a therapeutic diet. This error was attributed to the previous dietary supervisor, as confirmed by the CMM. The miscoding affected the accuracy of the care plan and the tasks assigned to staff, highlighting the importance of accurate MDS assessments for proper resident care and facility reimbursement.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet their medical, nursing, and mental needs. For one resident, the care plan did not address significant dental issues, such as missing and broken teeth, despite the resident's admission assessment indicating intact cognition and no dental issues coded. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident had not seen a dentist for a long time and was unsure if the facility had offered dental services. The Care Management Manager (CMM) acknowledged that dental issues should be care planned due to the risk of weight loss, and there was an ongoing performance improvement plan for care plans. Another resident's care plan failed to reflect specific instructions for managing a Jejunostomy feeding tube, which had a history of clogging. The care plan did not include the practice of gently pushing a plunger instead of using gravity when flushing the tube, as observed during the survey. Interviews with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that this practice was necessary due to the resident's history of tube clogging. The care plan nurse also acknowledged that the care plan should be individualized to address this issue, but it was not reflected in the current comprehensive care plan. The facility's Care Plan Guidelines policy emphasizes the interdisciplinary approach to addressing care area triggers and achieving an effective comprehensive plan of care for each resident. However, the deficiencies observed indicate a failure to adhere to these guidelines, resulting in inaccurate care plans that do not meet the residents' needs. This deficiency places residents at risk of not receiving proper care and services.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Bowel Incontinence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident who was incontinent of bowel. The resident's annual MDS assessment indicated she was incontinent of both bowel and bladder, but her care plan was not updated to reflect bowel incontinence. This oversight was identified during a record review and interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the CMM, who acknowledged the importance of accurate and updated care plans to ensure residents receive the necessary care. The resident in question was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, polyarthritis, and dementia, and was severely cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for ADLs, and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Despite these conditions, the care plan only noted bladder incontinence. Interviews with the LVN and CMM revealed that the care plan had not been reviewed or revised since the CMM took over the position, highlighting a lapse in the facility's process for updating care plans following MDS assessments.
Deficient Catheter Care and Infection Control
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with a suprapubic catheter, leading to a deficiency in preventing urinary tract infections and ensuring catheter security. During an observation, a CNA moved the resident from a wheelchair to a bed and placed the urinary drainage bag on the bed's low rail, allowing the bag and drainage spout to touch the floor. This action was contrary to the facility's policy, which requires that catheter bags not rest on the floor to prevent cross-contamination and infection. Additionally, the resident did not have a leg strap to secure the catheter tubing, increasing the risk of the catheter pulling and causing pain or dislodgement. The resident involved had a history of cerebrovascular disease, cognitive communication deficit, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and dementia, with a severely impaired cognitive status as indicated by a BIMS score of 02 out of 15. Interviews with the CNA, LVN, and DON confirmed the importance of securing the catheter tubing with a leg strap and keeping the drainage bag off the floor to prevent infection and injury. The facility's failure to adhere to these practices placed the resident at risk for urinary tract infections and potential injury from the unsecured catheter.
Improper Jejunostomy Tube Placement Check
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving enteral feeding through a Jejunostomy tube was provided with appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications. Specifically, the facility did not adhere to its policy for checking the placement of the Jejunostomy feeding tube. The policy required checking the tube placement by visualizing and comparing tube markings to prior checks. However, LVN C checked the tube placement by auscultation, listening for growl sounds after injecting air into the feeding port, which was not part of the facility's policy. The resident involved, who was cognitively intact, had a history of hemiplegia, dysphagia, cerebral edema, and diaphragmatic hernia. Despite the resident not experiencing any discomfort, the method used by LVN C to check the tube placement was incorrect according to the facility's policy. LVN C admitted to not knowing the policy and acknowledged the need for further training, as most residents had gastrostomy tubes rather than Jejunostomy tubes. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility policy did not include checking tube placement by auscultation.
Failure to Adhere to Physician's Order for Oxygen Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for a resident who required oxygen therapy. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was observed receiving oxygen at 3.0 Lpm via nasal cannula, contrary to the physician's order of 2.0 Lpm. This discrepancy was noted during observations on two separate occasions. The resident believed the oxygen level was supposed to be 3.0 Lpm because that was how it was set up by the nurses. Interviews with the nursing staff, including an LVN and the DON, confirmed the oversight. The LVN acknowledged that it was the nurse's responsibility to check the oxygen levels every shift, but admitted to not checking the resident's oxygen level on the morning of the observation due to being busy. The DON confirmed that the resident should have been receiving oxygen at 2.0 Lpm as per the physician's order, and that the nurses were expected to verify this every shift. The facility's policy on oxygen administration required verification of the physician's order, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Inadequate Competency in Jejunostomy Tube Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) had the appropriate competencies to care for residents, specifically in the context of checking the placement of a Jejunostomy feeding tube. The LVN did not follow the facility's policy, which required checking the tube placement by visualization and comparison of tube markings to prior checks. Instead, the LVN used auscultation by injecting air into the feeding port and listening for growl sounds, a method not included in the facility's policy. This deviation from protocol was observed during an interaction with a resident who had a Jejunostomy feeding tube. The resident involved had a history of hemiplegia, hemiparesis, dysphagia, cerebral edema, and diaphragmatic hernia. Despite the LVN's actions, the resident did not report any discomfort. The LVN admitted to not knowing the facility policy and acknowledged the need for further training, as most residents had gastrostomy feeding tubes. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the LVN's competency had been assessed, but the method used by the LVN was not in line with the facility's established procedures.
Unsecured Medication and Treatment Carts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and that only authorized personnel had access to the keys. This deficiency was observed when LVN A left both the medication cart and treatment cart unsecured in the 400 Hallway while preparing to perform wound treatments for a resident. During this time, other staff members were present in the hallway, passing out breakfast trays and cleaning the floor near the unsecured carts. The surveyor, who was left in the hallway with the unsecured carts, reported the situation to the ADON, who then secured the carts. Interviews conducted with the ADON and LVN A revealed that the carts should have been secured to prevent unauthorized access to medications and supplies, which could be harmful if misused. Both the ADON and LVN A acknowledged the importance of securing the carts and stated that nurses were trained to keep them locked. The facility's policy on medication storage, dated 01/21/2021, also reflected that all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, and medications must be under direct observation or locked during a medication pass.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Catheter and Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, as evidenced by two specific incidents involving residents with indwelling catheters and wound care needs. In the first incident, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) improperly handled a resident's urinary catheter drainage bag by hooking it to the low rail of the bed, allowing the uncovered bottom of the bag and the loosened drainage spout to touch the floor. This practice was contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates that catheter bags should not rest on the floor to prevent cross-contamination and infection. Interviews with the CNA and a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) confirmed the improper handling and acknowledged the risk of infection due to the bag touching the floor. In the second incident, an LVN failed to adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing wound care to a resident with a pressure ulcer. The LVN entered and exited the resident's room multiple times without sanitizing her hands, despite clear signage indicating the requirement to do so. The resident was on EBP due to an implanted vascular access device and pressure ulcers, necessitating strict adherence to hand hygiene protocols to prevent infection spread. The LVN admitted to neglecting hand sanitization due to being in a hurry, despite having received training on EBP. Both incidents highlight lapses in infection control practices that could lead to cross-contamination and infections among residents. The facility's policies and training were not effectively implemented, as evidenced by the staff's failure to follow established guidelines for catheter care and EBP. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) further emphasized the importance of adhering to these protocols to ensure resident safety.
Failure to Maintain Safe Wheelchair Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition, specifically concerning a resident's wheelchair. Observations revealed that the wheelchair's left and right armrests had torn vinyl with sharp, ragged edges, which appeared worn and damaged. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required a manual wheelchair for mobility, reported experiencing scratches from the damaged armrests but did not inform the staff as she did not want to bother them. Interviews with the Director of Rehab and the Director of Nursing indicated that the therapy staff typically checked residents' wheelchairs, but they were unaware of the issue with the resident's wheelchair because she had not reported it. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the safety issue posed by the worn and torn armrests but was not aware of any injuries resulting from the condition. The deficiency highlights a lapse in the facility's responsibility to ensure the safety and maintenance of equipment used by residents.
Deficiency in Resident Room Size
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that 44 out of 44 resident rooms provided the required minimum of 80 square feet of floor space per resident. Observations and measurements conducted by the Life Safety Code surveyor revealed that the two-bed resident rooms measured between 155 and 157 square feet, resulting in only 77.5 to 78.5 square feet per bed. This deficiency was identified in multiple rooms across different halls, including Halls A, B, C, D, E, and F. During an interview, the Administrator confirmed that the rooms in question were indeed two-person rooms and did not meet the minimum space requirement. The facility's Bed Classification Form 3740, dated 06/14/2024, listed these rooms as two resident bedrooms, corroborating the surveyor's findings. The Administrator acknowledged the deficiency and requested a room size waiver, indicating that all justification criteria for the waiver had been met.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 43 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cuero
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cuero Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Paradigm At Stevens | 14.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Yoakum Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 16.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Yorktown Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 16.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Shiner Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Inc | 23.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Whispering Oaks Rehab & Nursing.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.