Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at University Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to submit the completed Provider Investigation Report (Form 3613-A) for an alleged neglect incident involving unknown residents, where staff were reported to be wearing earbuds and using cell phones while on duty. Although the initial incident reports were filed with the State Survey Agency and the investigation report was completed, the Administrator did not submit the investigation results within the required five working days and acknowledged forgetting to do so. The Administrator also reported that the facility lacked a policy addressing timely submission of Provider Investigation Reports.
Surveyors found that the facility did not include all ordered respiratory interventions in the comprehensive care plans for two residents with significant respiratory conditions. One resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure, pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary edema had a PRN nebulizer treatment ordered, but the care plan only listed pneumonia and oxygen therapy, omitting nebulizer use. Another resident with acute respiratory failure and COPD had an order for continuous O2 via nasal cannula to maintain SpO2 above 92%, but the care plan only documented emphysema/COPD and did not include the continuous O2 therapy. The DON acknowledged that nebulizer treatments and O2 therapy should appear in care plans, and the MDS Coordinator reported that some care areas were missing from care plans due to issues with the electronic charting system.
Surveyors found that two residents receiving respiratory treatments had their nebulizer and oxygen equipment improperly stored and not reflected in their care plans. One resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure, pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary edema had a PRN nebulizer order, but the nebulizer treatment was not included in the care plan, and the nebulizer mask and mouthpiece were left unbagged on a bedside table when not in use. Another resident with acute respiratory failure and COPD had an order for continuous O2 via nasal cannula that was not included in the care plan, and the oxygen tubing/cannula was left unbagged on a chair when not in use. A CNA and the DON confirmed that such equipment should be bagged when not in use due to infection risk, and the DON and Administrator acknowledged there was no facility policy for proper storage of respiratory equipment.
A resident with a history of seizures and brain injury did not receive the increased dose of levetiracetam (Keppra) as ordered by a hospital physician, due to a missed entry in the facility's electronic health record. The resident continued to receive a lower dose for several weeks, despite updated orders, and experienced a fall with convulsions during this period. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed the medication error and the resident's ongoing risk factors.
A resident with moderate dementia and impaired mobility was able to leave the facility unsupervised on two occasions, despite prior exit-seeking behavior and care plan interventions. The resident was later found by police suffering from severe hyperthermia and respiratory failure, requiring hospitalization. Staff and record reviews indicated that the resident's risk for elopement was not adequately identified or addressed, resulting in a failure to provide sufficient supervision and assistance to prevent accidents.
The facility did not consistently develop or implement care plans for residents requiring supervision while smoking, and staff assigned to supervise were observed inattentive, including using a phone instead of monitoring. Several residents with cognitive or physical impairments were not properly supervised during smoking, despite documented needs for such supervision.
A resident with COPD and acute respiratory failure, who required total assistance and as-needed oxygen therapy, was found to have their oxygen mask left unbagged on a chest instead of being stored in a plastic bag when not in use. Nursing staff and facility policy confirmed the mask should have been bagged to prevent infection, but this standard was not followed.
Surveyors found that kitchen staff did not properly separate dented cans from other food items and failed to discard milk past its use by date. Staff interviews confirmed that these actions were not consistent with facility procedures for food safety.
Three residents with mobility and cognitive impairments were observed using wheelchairs with damaged armrests, including missing vinyl coverings, exposed stuffing, loose attachments, and cracked surfaces with sharp edges. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent reporting and repair practices, with some CNAs not utilizing the electronic maintenance system and unclear responsibility between Rehab and Maintenance departments. Facility policy required equipment to be kept in good working order, but this was not consistently implemented.
A resident receiving wound care for leg ulcers was left exposed to the hallway when a nurse failed to close the door or privacy curtain. During the procedure, a physical therapist entered without knocking and discussed another resident's wound in front of the patient. Both staff members later acknowledged that these actions compromised the resident's privacy and dignity, despite having received training on resident rights.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions and a draining leg ulcer was not consistently provided with clean linens or a clean environment. Staff failed to regularly change soiled sheets and remove used protective boots, despite repeated notifications from the treatment nurse and the resident. The resident experienced discomfort and had to wait for staff willing to address his needs, with soiled items remaining in his room for an extended period.
Two residents in the facility did not receive ordered wound care, leading to a deficiency in pressure ulcer management. A male resident with severe cognitive impairment missed multiple wound care sessions, as did a female resident with existing pressure ulcers. Observations and interviews revealed a lack of consistent monitoring and accountability among staff, with missed wound care on numerous dates. The facility's policy required adherence to physician orders for wound care, which was not followed, placing residents at risk for infection.
A facility failed to honor a resident's request to stay in bed, put on slippers, and eat breakfast in the dining area. The resident, with severe cognitive impairment, was abruptly woken and rushed out of bed by an LVN, despite protests and gestures. The incident highlighted a failure to respect the resident's rights to self-determination and choice.
The facility failed to update care plans for two residents, one with dehydration and another with dysphagia. A resident with dehydration did not have his condition or intravenous fluid use reflected in his care plan, despite requiring full assistance and having a history of hospitalization for dehydration. Another resident with dysphagia required a mechanically altered diet, but her care plan did not document this need. Staff interviews confirmed the importance of updating care plans to ensure appropriate care.
A resident with Alzheimer's and cognitive deficits was involved in an altercation due to inadequate one-to-one supervision. The resident was not within arm's reach of the assigned staff, leading to an incident with another resident. Miscommunication and missing signatures on the observation sheet contributed to the lapse in supervision.
Failure to Submit Completed Abuse/Neglect Investigation Report Within Required Timeframe
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report the results of an investigation of an alleged violation to the administrator or designee and to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the incident, as required. For Incident #1079379, involving an allegation of neglect related to staff members wearing earbuds and using their cell phones, the facility submitted the initial Facility Reported Incident and CII Self-Report Template to the State Survey Agency on 03/27/26. Record review showed that the Provider Investigation Report (Form 3613-A) for this incident, which occurred on 03/27/26, was completed on 04/02/26 and reflected that a thorough investigation of the alleged neglect of unknown residents had been conducted. However, review of the TULIP (Texas Unified Licensure Information Portal) system on 04/23/26 at 9:00AM showed that no Provider Investigation Report (Form 3613-A) had been filed for Incident #1079379. In an interview on 04/23/26 at 12:20PM, the Administrator stated she completed the Provider Investigation Report but forgot to submit it to the State Survey Agency within the required five-day timeframe and acknowledged that this resulted in a lack of timeliness in information being submitted. In a subsequent interview at 12:49PM, the Administrator also stated that the facility did not have a policy related to submitting Provider Investigation Reports within five working days of the incident.
Failure to Include Ordered Respiratory Interventions in Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans that included all ordered respiratory interventions for two residents. For one male resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and acute pulmonary edema, the MDS assessment showed he received respiratory treatments on admission and while residing at the facility. His physician’s orders included an active PRN order, started on 04/03/26, for Ipratropium-Albuterol inhalation solution via nebulizer every four hours as needed for wheezing or shortness of breath. However, review of his care plan, dated 03/30/26 and active as of 04/23/26, showed no evidence that nebulizer treatments were included in the plan of care; the only respiratory-related items documented were pneumonia and oxygen therapy. For a female resident with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and COPD, the MDS assessment also reflected that she received respiratory treatments on admission and while a resident. Her physician’s orders, dated 04/23/26, included an active PRN order, started on 04/18/26, for continuous oxygen at 2–4 L/min via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation above 92%. Review of her care plan, dated 02/25/26 and active as of 04/23/26, showed no evidence that continuous oxygen therapy was included in the plan of care; the only respiratory-related entry was that she had emphysema/COPD. During interviews, the DON acknowledged that nebulizer treatments and oxygen therapy should be included in care plans, and the MDS Coordinator stated she was responsible for comprehensive care plans and that some care areas were not reflected in certain care plans due to issues with the electronic charting system.
Improper Storage and Care Planning for Respiratory Equipment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s provision of safe and appropriate respiratory care, specifically related to the handling and storage of nebulizer and oxygen equipment, and the inclusion of these treatments in residents’ care plans. One male resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and acute pulmonary edema had an active PRN order for Ipratropium-Albuterol via nebulizer. His MDS reflected he received respiratory treatments on admission and while a resident. However, his care plan did not include his nebulizer treatment, and observation showed his nebulizer mask and mouthpiece were not in use and were lying unbagged on his bedside table. A female resident with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and COPD had an active order for continuous oxygen at 2–4 L/min via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation above 92%, and her MDS also reflected she received respiratory treatments on admission and while a resident. Her care plan did not include her continuous oxygen order, and observation showed her oxygen tubing/nasal cannula was not in use and was lying unbagged on a chair. A CNA and the DON both confirmed that nebulizer masks, mouthpieces, and oxygen tubing/nasal cannulas should be bagged when not in use and that failure to do so posed a potential infection risk. The DON and Administrator further stated the facility did not have a policy related to proper storage of respiratory equipment such as oxygen tubing, nasal cannulas, nebulizer masks, and nebulizer mouthpieces.
Failure to Administer Correct Dosage of Anti-Epileptic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received the correct dosage of levetiracetam (Keppra), an anti-epileptic medication, as ordered by the hospital physician. The resident, a female with a history of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, unsteadiness on feet, and unspecified convulsions, was admitted with a care plan identifying her as at risk for wandering, falls, and elopement. On 10/09/2025, the hospital physician ordered an increase in the resident's levetiracetam dosage from 500 mg twice daily to 750 mg twice daily. However, facility records show that the order was not entered into the facility's electronic health record system, and the resident continued to receive the lower dose until 11/26/2025, when the correct dosage was finally administered. During this period, medication administration records confirm that the resident received only 500 mg of levetiracetam twice daily, despite the updated hospital order. Laboratory results taken during this time indicated that the resident's blood levels of levetiracetam remained within the therapeutic range. Observations and interviews with staff revealed that the resident was non-verbal, a constant wanderer, and had experienced a fall followed by convulsions. The nurse on duty at the time of the fall could not determine whether the seizure caused the fall or vice versa. The facility physician acknowledged that the order for the increased dosage was missed and not entered by the nursing staff. The facility's policy on medication errors, as referenced in the report, defines significant medication errors to include those involving drugs that require titration to specific blood levels, such as anticonvulsants. The failure to update and administer the correct dosage of levetiracetam as ordered constitutes a significant medication error, as it could have altered the resident's blood levels and affected seizure control. The deficiency was identified through observation, interview, and record review, confirming that the resident did not receive the prescribed medication regimen for an extended period.
Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with moderate dementia, diabetes, and unsteadiness on his feet was not provided with adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, specifically elopement from the facility. The resident, who was ambulatory with a walker and had a BIMS score indicating moderately impaired cognition, was identified as being at risk for elopement following an incident where he exited the facility by pushing past visitors. Despite this, interventions such as visual checks and care plan updates were implemented only after the initial elopement attempt. On a subsequent occasion, the resident was again able to leave the facility unsupervised. Staff became aware of the resident's absence after a family member, monitoring a camera in the resident's room, called to report that the resident was not visible. A systematic search was conducted, and the resident was eventually found by police near train tracks, having suffered severe hyperthermia and acute hypoxic respiratory failure, requiring hospitalization and intubation. The resident's care plan had included interventions for exit-seeking behavior, but these measures did not prevent the second elopement. Interviews with staff and review of records revealed that the resident had expressed distress about his family being away and concerns about his farm, which may have contributed to his exit-seeking behavior. The facility's risk assessment initially did not identify the resident as high risk for elopement, and the care plan interventions were not sufficient to prevent the resident from leaving the building on two separate occasions. The deficiency was identified as having placed the resident at risk for serious harm, as evidenced by the resident's hospitalization following the elopement.
Failure to Implement and Supervise Smoking Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and maintain adequate supervision and care planning for multiple residents who required supervision while smoking. Record reviews for ten residents revealed that several did not have a care plan addressing smoking, despite assessments indicating the need for supervision due to cognitive impairment, physical limitations, or both. For some residents, although the care plan included supervision while smoking, the actual supervision provided was inadequate. Observations and interviews confirmed that staff assigned to monitor residents in the smoking area were not attentive. Specifically, a staff member was observed using her phone and not actively supervising approximately ten residents who were smoking. Both the administrator and the staff member acknowledged that staff were not permitted to use phones while supervising residents during smoking times, and the staff member admitted to not following this protocol. The residents involved had a range of diagnoses, including Alzheimer's disease, COPD, respiratory failure, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, schizoaffective disorder, and lack of coordination. Many had moderate to severe cognitive impairment and required supervision for activities of daily living. Despite these needs, the facility did not consistently implement or document appropriate care plans or provide the required supervision during smoking, as evidenced by both documentation and direct observation.
Improper Storage of Oxygen Mask for Resident Requiring Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with a history of acute respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was not provided respiratory care in accordance with professional standards and the resident's care plan. The resident required total assistance for activities of daily living and had physician orders for as-needed inhalation treatments. The care plan specified that oxygen therapy should be provided as needed. During an observation, the resident's oxygen mask was found unbagged and sitting on top of a chest, rather than being stored in a plastic bag when not in use as required by facility policy and professional standards. Interviews with nursing staff, including an RN, the ADON, and the DON, confirmed that the oxygen mask should have been bagged when not in use to prevent infection. Staff were unable to confirm when the device was last used and acknowledged that the mask was not stored properly. Facility policy on oxygen administration required safe and effective delivery of oxygen and that residents remain free from infection, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Properly Store and Discard Food Items
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, during inspection of the kitchen's refrigerator, three 1-gallon containers of milk were found with use by dates that had already passed. In the dry storage area, several large cans of food, including spaghetti sauce, mushrooms, pumpkin, and apple jelly, were found to be dented and not separated from other food items as required. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and another kitchen staff member confirmed that it was the kitchen staff's responsibility to inspect, label, and properly store food items upon delivery. Both staff members acknowledged that dented cans should be stored separately and returned to the vendor, and that expired milk should be discarded. However, the observed practices did not align with these procedures, as dented cans were found in regular storage and expired milk was present in the refrigerator.
Failure to Maintain Safe Wheelchair Armrests
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain wheelchair armrests in safe and functional condition for three residents with significant mobility and cognitive impairments. Observations revealed that one resident's wheelchair had a missing vinyl covering on the left armrest, exposing interior stuffing, and the right armrest was loosely attached with tape and missing most of its cushion material. Another resident's wheelchair had a split armrest with cushion material hanging down, and a third resident's wheelchair had both armrests cracked with sharp edges exposed. All three residents were observed using these wheelchairs during daily activities, and two expressed a desire for new armrests, though neither reported having skin injuries at the time. Interviews with staff indicated inconsistent practices regarding the reporting and repair of wheelchair deficiencies. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were expected to report needed repairs through an electronic maintenance system, but at least one CNA admitted to never using the system for wheelchair issues. The Director of Rehab stated that her department repaired armrests when they noticed damage, regardless of whether residents were currently receiving rehab services. The Maintenance Supervisor indicated that while he performed repairs, the Rehab Department generally handled most wheelchair maintenance. The facility's policy required all equipment to be maintained in good working order to ensure resident safety, but these procedures were not consistently followed, resulting in unsafe wheelchair conditions.
Failure to Provide Privacy and Dignity During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident privacy and confidentiality during wound care for one resident. During an observation, a treatment nurse provided wound care to a resident's left lower leg and calf while the resident was in bed, but did not close the door or pull the privacy curtain, leaving the resident visible from the hallway. Additionally, a physical therapist entered the room without knocking or announcing his presence and discussed another resident's wound care needs in front of the resident receiving treatment. Both the treatment nurse and the physical therapist acknowledged during interviews that their actions compromised the resident's privacy and dignity, and both stated they had received training on resident rights, privacy, and dignity within the past year. The resident involved was alert, oriented, and able to make decisions, with medical diagnoses including coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and anemia. The resident's care plan included management of diabetic and arterial ulcers. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and the administrator, confirmed that privacy and dignity should have been maintained by closing doors and curtains during care and that staff are expected to respect resident privacy at all times. Facility policy also reflected the right of each resident to privacy and dignity during treatment and personal care.
Failure to Maintain Clean Linens and Remove Soiled Items for Resident with Draining Wound
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with a history of coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and anemia, who was alert and oriented, was not provided with a clean and comfortable environment as required. The resident had a diabetic and arterial ulcer on the left lower leg, which was draining and required regular dressing changes. Observations revealed that the resident's bed linens were soiled with dried stains of reddish, brown, and yellow substances, and the resident's feet were resting on these stained linens. The bandage on the resident's leg was also soiled, and two sets of soiled protective boots were left piled on top of the resident's drawers for approximately two weeks. Interviews with staff indicated that the treatment nurse had repeatedly found the resident's linens soiled over the past two weeks and had informed other staff, but the situation did not improve. The nurse reported instances where the resident's leg dressing was stuck to the soiled linens and required saline to remove it. The resident confirmed that he disliked having dirty sheets, had informed staff, and noted that the night shift often did not change his linens, leaving him to wait for the day shift. The resident also stated that the soiled boots remained in his room until the surveyor's intervention. Additional interviews with CNAs and nurses revealed inconsistent awareness and action regarding the resident's needs. Some staff were unaware of the frequency of the wound drainage or the discomfort caused by the dressing sticking to the linens. Staff acknowledged that soiled linens and dressings should be changed, but the practice was not consistently followed. Facility leadership confirmed that maintaining resident dignity and cleanliness was expected, and that soiled items should be removed from resident rooms.
Failure to Provide Ordered Wound Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide ordered wound care for two residents, leading to a deficiency in pressure ulcer management. Resident #13, a male with severe cognitive impairment and at risk for pressure ulcers, did not receive wound care on multiple occasions as ordered by the physician. The treatment administration records indicated that wound care was missed on several specific dates across December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025. Observations confirmed that Resident #13 was nonverbal and unable to communicate about his care. Resident #87, a female with severe cognitive impairment and existing pressure ulcers, also did not receive wound care as ordered. The treatment administration records showed that wound care was not performed on numerous dates in January and February 2025. Observations revealed that dressings were not changed as required, and interviews with staff indicated a lack of awareness or acknowledgment of missed wound care. The wound care nurse and floor nurses were responsible for ensuring wound care was completed, but there was a breakdown in communication and execution of these duties. Interviews with the facility's staff, including the wound care nurse, LVN, ADON, and the newly appointed DON, highlighted a lack of consistent monitoring and accountability for wound care. The facility's policy required wound care to be performed as ordered by the physician, but this was not adhered to, placing residents at risk for infection and further deterioration of their pressure ulcers. The deficiency was identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews, indicating systemic issues in the facility's wound care management.
Failure to Honor Resident's Self-Determination and Choice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for a resident reviewed for respect and dignity. The staff did not honor the resident's request to stay in bed, put on her slippers, and eat breakfast in the dining area instead of staying in bed and eating in her room. This incident involved a resident with severe cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and other medical conditions, who required extensive assistance with daily activities. The deficiency was identified when a video was presented by the resident's representative during a care plan meeting. The video showed an LVN abruptly waking the resident, who reacted in surprise, and then rushing her out of bed despite her protests and gestures towards her feet. The LVN insisted that the resident had to get up and go to breakfast, disregarding the resident's expressed preferences and needs. The resident's representative had previously informed the staff that the resident needed to be approached quietly and slowly and that she would cooperate more easily if shoes or slippers were put on her feet. Interviews with staff members revealed that there may have been a communication problem, as the LVN had a heavy accent and the resident spoke mostly Spanish. The facility's records indicated that the resident had a BIMS score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and had a communication board to assist with her needs. The incident highlighted a failure to respect the resident's rights to self-determination and choice, as outlined in the facility's Resident Rights policy.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Residents with Dehydration and Dysphagia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plans for two residents, which could potentially impact their care. Resident #13, a male with a diagnosis of dehydration, had severely impaired cognitive skills and required full assistance with eating. Despite receiving intravenous fluids and having a history of hospitalization for dehydration, his care plan did not address his dehydration or the use of intravenous fluids. Interviews with staff, including the Nurse Practitioner and Licensed Vocational Nurse, highlighted the importance of monitoring Resident #13's fluid intake to prevent dehydration, yet the care plan remained outdated. Resident #22, a female with severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of dysphagia, required a mechanically altered diet. However, her care plan did not reflect her dietary needs or her diagnosis of dysphagia. Observations showed that she was provided with mechanically altered food, but the lack of documentation in her care plan could lead to staff being unaware of her specific dietary requirements. Interviews with the MDS nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that care plans should include such critical information to ensure appropriate care. The facility's policy on comprehensive care planning mandates that care plans describe the services necessary to achieve the resident's highest practicable well-being. The failure to update the care plans for these residents means that staff might not be fully informed about the residents' needs, potentially compromising their care. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the responsibility of various staff members in monitoring and updating care plans, emphasizing the risks associated with outdated care plans.
Inadequate Supervision Leads to Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident who was placed on one-to-one monitoring due to unpredictable behaviors and aggression. On the day of the incident, the resident was involved in an altercation with another resident, which did not result in any injuries. The incident occurred because the resident was not under the required one-to-one supervision at the time, as there was a miscommunication regarding who was assigned to monitor the resident after a Halloween party. The resident, who had a history of Alzheimer's disease, depression, muscle wasting, and cognitive communication deficit, was supposed to be under constant supervision to prevent incidents and accidents. However, on the day of the incident, the assigned staff members did not sign the observation assignment sheet, indicating a lapse in supervision. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident was not within arm's reach of the assigned staff member, which allowed the resident to engage in an altercation with another resident. The facility's failure to maintain the required level of supervision for the resident placed them at risk for potential altercations and injuries. The lack of a dedicated staff member to monitor the resident at all times contributed to the incident, highlighting a breakdown in communication and adherence to the facility's supervision protocols.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 610 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 16 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Denton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Forest Village By Purehealth | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Denton Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Corinth Rehabilitation Suites On The Parkway | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| Cottonwood Nursing And Rehabilitation | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Vintage Health Care Center | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for University Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.