Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Tuscany Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored according to accepted professional principles when an MA's personal belongings were found in the bottom drawer of medication cart #3. The MA said she normally stores personal items in the locker room but forgot, and the DON confirmed staff personal items were not supposed to be in resident medication carts. The facility policy stated team members' personal belongings shall be stored in the employee breakroom.
Unlabeled and undated food items were found in the kitchen storage areas, including a bag of hot dogs in the walk-in refrigerator and a bag of peas and carrots in the walk-in freezer. The FSD and dietary staff said all kitchen staff were responsible for labeling and dating food, and the facility policy required foods taken from original packaging and perishable items in the refrigerator or freezer to be labeled with the date opened or use-by date.
Missing MAR Documentation for PRN Hydrocodone: A resident with cancer had PRN Hydrocodone/APAP pulled from the ADC, but the doses were not documented on the MAR. The DON, RN, LVN, and UM discussed the pulls and the resident’s family reported conflicting information about when pain meds were given. Facility policy stated meds must be documented immediately after administration.
A resident identified as a high fall risk was found deceased on the floor with a head injury and in rigor mortis, indicating inadequate supervision. Despite the care plan requiring prompt response to needs, the resident was not monitored adequately, leading to an unwitnessed fall. Discrepancies in the facility's rounding policy contributed to the incident.
The facility's kitchen failed to meet food safety standards, with dented cans stored with other food items and scoops left in dry bulk bins, risking foodborne illness for 99 residents. Staff interviews revealed lapses in following policies for handling dented cans and preventing cross-contamination.
Personal Items Stored in Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed, specifically cart #3. On observation, MA A's personal belongings, including a handbag, makeup bag, and lunch bag, were found in the bottom drawer of the medication cart. During interview, MA A stated she normally stored her personal items in the locker room but had forgotten to do so, and she acknowledged that personal items in the medication cart could spill and cause contamination and that drug diversion could happen. The DON later confirmed that staff personal items were not supposed to be in resident medication carts and stated that all staff personal items were to be stored in the locker in the breakroom. The facility policy titled employee Handbook - Team Member Property stated that all team members' personal belongings shall be stored in the employee breakroom.
Unlabeled and Undated Food Items in Storage
Penalty
Summary
Food items were not stored in accordance with professional food service standards in the kitchen. During observation, one one-gallon Ziploc bag of hot dogs in the walk-in refrigerator was not labeled and not dated, and one one-gallon Ziploc bag of peas and carrots in the walk-in freezer was also not labeled and not dated. The report identified these items as being in storage without the required identifying information. During interview, the Food Service Manager stated a new Dietary Aide likely placed the groceries on the shelves without labeling them and said all dietary staff were expected to label and date items, with cooks checking behind staff to ensure compliance. [NAME] A stated all kitchen staff were responsible for labeling and dating food items and said the groceries came in on Monday and Wednesday. Dietary Aide A stated kitchen staff should label food items after each meal and that the risk of unlabeled food was that residents could get sick because food that was even a few days old could make them sick. The facility policy titled Food Labels in Dietary stated that foods removed from original packaging must be labeled with the date opened or use-by date, and perishable items stored in the refrigerator or freezer must also be labeled with a use-by date and date opened if no expiration date is stamped on the container.
Missing MAR Documentation for PRN Hydrocodone
Penalty
Summary
Resident #31’s medication record was not kept in accordance with accepted professional standards because Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg that was pulled from the automated medication dispensing system was not documented on the MAR. The resident was a male admitted with diagnoses including intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, and his admission MDS was still in progress at the time of review. His order was for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg, 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain, with a start date of 8/12/25. Record review of the Administered Transaction Log showed Hydrocodone/APAP 10-325 mg was pulled on 8/17/25 at 10:34 p.m. and again on 8/18/25 at 6:40 a.m. by RN A, but the August 2025 MAR did not show documentation for those doses. The MAR instead showed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen documented on 8/17/25 at 6:15 p.m. and the next dose on 8/18/25 at 1:33 p.m. During interview, the resident’s family member said they could not get a clear answer about when the last Hydrocodone was administered and reported conflicting information from staff and the room board. During interviews, the DON, RN G, LVN R, and Unit Manager A discussed the medication pulls and documentation process. RN G said LVN R had pulled medications during the night shift and she was the witness, while LVN R said she remembered pulling and administering medications for the resident around 10:30 p.m. and again before 7 a.m. the next day, but was not sure whether she documented the Hydrocodone administration on the MAR. The facility policy stated that a nurse or certified medication aide documents all medications administered on the MAR and that administration is documented immediately after it is given.
Inadequate Supervision Leads to Resident's Death
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and care for a resident identified as a high fall risk, resulting in a tragic incident. The resident, a male with a history of sepsis, muscle weakness, hyperlipidemia, pleural effusion, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, was found on the floor, nude, with a head injury, and in rigor mortis. The care plan for this resident indicated that his call light should be kept within reach and that his needs should be promptly addressed. However, the resident was not adequately monitored, leading to an unwitnessed fall that went unnoticed for an extended period. On the evening of the incident, CNA-A checked on the resident at around 7 pm and found him safely in bed with his gown on and call light within reach. She then proceeded to attend to other residents and informed RN-A that she would be starting showers and needed assistance with monitoring call lights. It was not until approximately 10:45 pm that CNA-A discovered the resident on the floor, unresponsive, and called for help. Upon arrival, RN-A and other staff found the resident cold and stiff, indicating that rigor mortis had set in, and EMS confirmed the time of death shortly after. Interviews with facility staff revealed discrepancies in the facility's policy and practice regarding resident rounding. The Administrator stated that residents should be rounded on at least once every 8 hours, while the Director of Nursing indicated that the goal was every two hours. This lack of consistent and adequate supervision contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent death, highlighting a significant deficiency in the facility's care practices.
Food Safety Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety in their kitchen, as observed during a survey. Three dented cans were found stored with other cans intended for resident meals in the dry storage room. Additionally, two storage bins containing dry bulk items had scoops stored inside them, which is against the facility's policy. These practices were identified as potential risks for foodborne illness among the 99 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Interviews with the Food Service Manager and staff revealed that the dented cans were a result of a package being dropped during delivery, and the staff responsible for checking the cans did not notice the dents. The facility's policy requires dented cans to be moved to a designated area and either returned to the vendor or discarded. Furthermore, the staff acknowledged that scoops should not be stored inside dry bulk food bins to prevent cross-contamination, which could lead to foodborne illness. The facility's policies on food storage and handling were not followed, contributing to the identified deficiencies.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 490 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 46 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Pearland
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Colonnades At Reflection Bay | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 3 |
| Thrive Rehabilitation Of Pearland | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 27 | 5 |
| Terra Bella Health And Wellness Suites | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 2 |
| Richard A. Anderson (state Of Texas Veterans Land | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Oasis At Pearland | 5.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Tuscany Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.