Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Springs Healthcare And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Provide Needed ADL Assistance and Grooming: A resident with incontinence and significant neurologic and respiratory diagnoses was found wet and waiting a prolonged time for brief changes, with a family member providing care. Another resident did not receive scheduled showers/bed baths and linen changes as expected, and a third resident was observed with unkempt hair, an unshaved beard, and overgrown dirty fingernails despite needing help with personal hygiene. The DON stated CNAs were responsible for rounding, incontinent care, bathing, and grooming.
A resident receiving Lacosamide had a controlled-medication documentation discrepancy when an LPN administered the dose but did not sign the narcotic log, and two expired medications were found on the 400-hall med cart: Nystatin powder for one resident and a Glucagon kit for another. The LPN stated she forgot to document the controlled medication because she was busy, and she was responsible for checking expiration dates and removing outdated drugs from the cart.
Improper food labeling, sanitizer control, and kitchen hygiene practices were observed. Multiple food items in the cooler, freezer, and kitchen had missing open dates, missing use-by dates, or expired use-by dates. The dishwasher sanitizer tested over 200 ppm, staff reported they had not been trained on the chemicals, the puree blender was reused with food residue still present, and two kitchen staff were observed with facial hair not fully covered by hair restraints.
Privacy and Confidential Record Failures: A CNA provided incontinent care to a resident with dementia and other impairments without fully closing the privacy curtain, leaving the care visible to anyone entering the room. In a separate event, an LVN left a medication cart computer screen open and unlocked with a resident’s MAR displayed and visible to unauthorized individuals. The DON and ADM stated staff were expected to protect resident privacy and lock charting computers when unattended.
Inaccurate MDS Coding of Antiplatelet Medication: A resident with stroke, CAD, DM, HTN, hyperlipidemia, and severe cognitive impairment had a comprehensive MDS that incorrectly coded aspirin therapy as an anticoagulant and showed no antiplatelet use. Record review showed no anticoagulant order, but the resident did have an order for aspirin 81 mg daily related to cerebral infarction, and the care plan reflected antiplatelet therapy related to CAD and s/p CVA. MDS staff acknowledged the error and stated the resident’s assessment did not accurately reflect her status.
Unlocked Treatment Cart Left Unattended: A treatment cart near the nursing station and hall was observed unlocked with medications and treatment supplies unsecured while no nursing staff were present. Visitors and residents were nearby with direct access to the cart. An LVN stated she did not know who last used the cart and did not lock it, while the DON stated medication and treatment carts were expected to be locked unless a nurse or med aide was standing at them.
Infection Control Failure During Peri-Care: A CNA provided peri-care to a resident with dementia and significant ADL dependence but did not change soiled gloves before handling clean items. While cleaning the resident, the CNA touched a wipe packet, bed remote, blanket, sheet, and new brief with dirty gloves and then stored the contaminated wipe packet for later use. The CNA acknowledged the errors, and the DON stated the actions were improper and increased the risk of disease transmission.
A resident with vascular dementia, generalized anxiety, hypertension, and a BIMS score indicating moderate cognitive impairment, who required supervision or touch assistance for ambulation, was able to exit the facility alone without notifying staff or signing out, despite an established expectation that all residents leaving the building be documented on a sign-out log. The resident walked down the road toward a hospital where his spouse was admitted, became tired, and called a family member from a bank; the family member then contacted the facility, at which point staff realized the resident was missing. Staff and leadership acknowledged that the resident knew the exit code, was considered independent and allowed to walk outside, and that the event was not treated as an elopement, even though the incident log documented it as such and the facility’s own sign-out expectations were not followed, resulting in a failure to provide adequate supervision and maintain an environment free of accident hazards.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was exposed during a bed bath when the room door was left open, despite the privacy curtain being drawn. Multiple staff, including hospice CNAs, a CNA delivering lunch, and a housekeeper, entered and exited the room without ensuring the door was closed, resulting in a failure to maintain the resident's privacy during personal care.
Staff failed to consistently knock on resident doors before entering, as observed with three residents. Interviews with the residents confirmed that this was a recurring issue, and staff acknowledged awareness of the policy requiring them to knock and announce themselves. The facility's policy and staff training emphasized respecting resident privacy, but the expectation was not always met in practice.
Staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene and food safety protocols, including a kitchen worker handling trash and food without washing hands and a CNA distributing meal trays to multiple residents without sanitizing hands between each. Residents affected included those with dementia, Alzheimer's, diabetes, and other serious conditions, many of whom required assistance with eating.
A resident with a history of atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart attack, and hypertension did not receive prescribed blood pressure medications for eight days after admission to the facility. This occurred due to a miscommunication between a nurse and an NP, leading to the unintended discontinuation of the medications. The issue was identified following a grievance about the resident's high blood pressure and medication changes.
A medical assistant failed to sanitize a wrist blood pressure monitor between uses on two residents, both with severe cognitive impairments and multiple health issues, during a medication round. The DON was informed of the oversight but was unaware of its extent. The facility's policy requires equipment sanitization between residents, but no recent training on this had been conducted.
Failure to Provide Timely ADL Care, Bathing, and Grooming
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to complete activities of daily living received needed assistance with grooming, bathing, and incontinent care. The report identified deficiencies for three residents reviewed for ADL care: one resident did not receive timely brief changes, one resident did not receive scheduled showers/bed baths with linens changed afterward, and one resident did not have his hair, beard, and fingernails groomed and cleaned as needed. Resident #84 was an older male admitted with pneumonitis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphasia, and hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. His admission MDS triggered urinary incontinence and pressure ulcer care areas, and his care plan required two staff for toileting and cleansing after incontinent episodes. Nursing progress notes described him as a one-person assist with ADLs and brief changes and incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 04/21/2026, his family member was observed changing his wet brief, clothing, and bedding because they were wet with urine, and the family member stated this had happened before and that staff had taken 45 minutes or longer at night to respond to his incontinent care needs. Resident #84 nodded and indicated he had waited a long time to be changed. Resident #108’s record reflected that he requested showers rather than bed baths, but the DON stated showers or bed baths were to be provided on scheduled days and linens changed after each bath. The DON also stated that residents should be rounded on every two hours or more often as needed and that leaving incontinent residents without care could lead to skin breakdown and UTIs. Resident #99 was observed lying in bed with a disheveled appearance, long untidy hair, unshaved facial hair, and jagged overgrown fingernails with brown substance underneath. He stated he preferred his hair, beard, and nails trimmed and had his own shaving set because his skin was very sensitive. His care plan required assistance with personal hygiene and oral care, and the DON stated that CNAs were responsible for grooming, trimming, and cleaning residents.
Controlled Medication Documentation and Expired Drugs Left on Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate controlled medication documentation for a resident receiving Lacosamide oral solution on the 400-hall medication cart. Resident #87 had diagnoses including hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, convulsions, and major depression, and the care plan identified anticonvulsant use related to altered CNS due to chronic disease process. The resident’s order summary showed Lacosamide Oral Solution 10 mg/ml, 15 ml by mouth twice daily for unspecified convulsions, and the MAR reflected administration on 04/21/2026 at 7:00 a.m. without a corresponding entry in the controlled medication administration record. During the cart reconciliation and interview, LVN C stated she administered the scheduled Lacosamide solution to Resident #87 around 8:00 a.m. and documented it in the eMAR, but failed to document it in the controlled medication log. She stated she was responsible for documenting controlled medications when administered and said she forgot to sign for the medication because she was very busy that morning. She also stated that failing to document controlled medications could cause a discrepancy or medication error because the next nurse would not know the resident had already received the medication. The facility also failed to remove expired medications from the same medication cart. During observation of the 400-hall medication cart, expired Nystatin topical powder for Resident #76 and expired Glucagon Kit 1 mg for Resident #12 were found in the cart. Resident #76 had diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and erythema intertrigo, with an order for Nystatin Powder 100000 unit/gm applied topically twice daily on specified days for intertrigo and skin health. Resident #12 had diagnoses including type 1 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, and chronic kidney disease, with an order for Glucagon Emergency Kit 1 mg as needed for hypoglycemia. LVN C stated she was responsible for monitoring expiration dates and removing expired medications from the cart, and the DON stated nurses and medication aides were responsible for immediate documentation of controlled medications and for proper medication storage, with nursing managers responsible for weekly monitoring of medication documentation and expired medication removal.
Improper Food Labeling, Sanitizing, and Hair Restraint Practices
Penalty
Summary
Food items were observed in the walk-in cooler, walk-in freezer, and kitchen with missing open dates, missing use-by dates, and use-by dates that had already passed. In the walk-in cooler, boiled eggs, tortillas, turkey lunch meat, ham lunch meat, and jelly were found with incomplete labeling, including items with no open date and items with no use-by date. In the walk-in freezer, garlic bread was observed with no open date and a use-by date of 4-18-2026, and another package of garlic bread had no open date and no use-by date. In the kitchen, Cheerios were observed with no open date and a use-by date of 4-11-2026, and Fruit Loops and pasta were observed with open dates but no use-by dates. During observation of the dishwasher chemicals, DA J tested the dishwasher and the reading was over 200 parts per million, indicating the sanitizer was too strong. DA J stated he did not keep track of the daily chemical testing and reported he had not been trained on the dishwasher chemicals or how to adjust them. DM stated the dishwasher hose had broken and had been cut and pieced back together until it could be repaired, and she was not aware there were too many chemicals in the water. The facility’s policy required testing and recording the parts per million concentration of the solution. Additional kitchen observations showed CK pureeing chicken and rinsing the blender before placing it back for reuse while pureed chicken remained in the blender, and CK later cleaned it again after the surveyor took a picture. CK H stated the blender should be cleaned and sanitized between puree items and that he had run it through the dishwasher but it was not cleaned. On another observation, CK and DA I were not wearing hair restraint coverings over all of their facial hair. Staff interviews reflected that cooks and dietary aides were responsible for labeling and dating food, that all hair should be covered, and that the blender should be washed, rinsed, and sanitized between puree items.
Privacy and Confidential Record Failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure privacy during incontinent care for a resident with a fractured right femur, dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness, cognitive communication deficit, and need for assistance with personal care. The resident’s quarterly MDS reflected a BIMS score of 07 and complete support with toilet hygiene. Her care plan called for assistance by one staff member with personal hygiene and oral care. During observation, CNA H provided incontinent care in the resident’s room without fully drawing the privacy curtain, leaving the care visible to anyone who entered the room. The ADON entered the room while the care was in progress and observed the peri-care. CNA H stated the curtain had not been fully closed and acknowledged that the resident’s privacy had been compromised. The facility also failed to keep a resident’s personal and clinical records confidential when a medication cart computer screen was left open and unlocked with the resident’s MAR displayed. The resident was a 42-year-old female with hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side, hydrocephalus, and major depression. During observation, the computer screen on the LVN’s medication cart was unattended and visible to unauthorized individuals, including visitors or other residents. The LVN stated he had been instructed at hire to lock the computer screen when stepping away and acknowledged that leaving the screen unlocked with clinical information displayed could be harmful because anybody could see it. The DON and ADM stated that staff were expected to protect resident privacy and keep charting computers locked or minimized when unattended. The record also showed the LVN had completed a HIPAA in-service that included locking the screen when walking away, and facility policy directed staff to log off computers when leaving for longer periods of time. The report documented that the screen remained open and unlocked while the LVN was away from the cart, with the resident’s MAR visible.
Inaccurate MDS Coding of Antiplatelet Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #23’s comprehensive MDS assessment accurately reflected her status by incorrectly coding her use of an antiplatelet medication. Resident #23 was a [AGE]-year-old female admitted to the facility with diagnoses including stroke, coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Her BIMS Summary Score was 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and a reliable resident interview could not be obtained because she was unable to consistently track questions or recall basic information about herself. Record review showed the comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected an active diagnosis of long term (current) use of anticoagulants and indicated the resident was taking an anticoagulant medication with an indication for that drug class. The same assessment indicated she was not taking any antiplatelet medication and no indication was noted for antiplatelet use. However, the order summary report showed no anticoagulant orders and did show an order for Aspirin EC 81 mg daily related to cerebral infarction, started on June 4, 2025. The care plan also reflected antiplatelet therapy related to CAD and s/p CVA, with interventions for administering antiplatelet medication and monitoring for bleeding and adverse reactions. During interview, MDS B confirmed MDS A completed the relevant portions of the assessment and acknowledged the assessment was incorrect. MDS B stated MDS A likely miscoded aspirin as an anticoagulant rather than an antiplatelet drug and acknowledged the resident had no anticoagulant order and no diagnosis of long term use of anticoagulants. The ADM and DON stated that MDS assessments should reflect the resident’s status and the care provided, and that inaccurate assessment information could affect clinical data and financial data. The MDS User’s Manual was also reviewed and reflected that the assessment must accurately reflect the resident’s status.
Unlocked Treatment Cart Left Unattended
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and that access to the keys was limited to authorized personnel for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed, specifically the nursing treatment cart. On 04/19/2026 at 9:24 a.m., the treatment cart next to the nursing station and 500 hall was observed unlocked, with medications and treatment supplies unsecured. The locking mechanism was protruding outward, and the State Surveyor opened the drawers and took photos. No nursing staff were present in the area, and multiple visitors and residents were observed walking near the cart with direct access to it. During interview, LVN G stated there was no treatment nurse in the building on Sunday and that charge nurses were responsible for wound care and using the treatment cart. She stated she did not know who last worked on the cart and did not lock it, and acknowledged that residents and visitors could have access to the medications in the cart. The DON stated the medication and treatment carts were expected to be locked unless a nurse or medication aide was standing at the cart, with no exceptions, and the ADM stated charge nurses or med aides were responsible for locking the carts when not in attendance. The facility policy on Medication Storage in the Facility stated that compartments containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use and that unlocked medication carts are not left unattended.
Infection Control Failure During Peri-Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program for Resident #107 when CNA H provided peri-care and did not change soiled gloves before handling clean items. Resident #107 was an elderly female admitted with diagnoses including fracture of the lower end of the right femur, dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit, and need for assistance with personal care. Her quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 07, indicating moderately impaired cognition, and she required complete support with toilet hygiene. Her care plan identified an ADL self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, dementia, fatigue, impaired balance, limited ROM, and musculoskeletal impairment, with assistance by one staff member for personal hygiene and oral care. During observation, CNA H donned gloves and began peri-care, but after removing the old brief and cleaning the resident, she continued using the same soiled gloves while handling wipes directly from the packet, operating the bed remote control, and pulling up the blanket. She contaminated the new brief, the wet wipe packet, the remote control, the bed sheet, and the blanket by touching them with dirty gloves, and then stored the contaminated wipe packet in the drawer for future use. CNA H stated she was still in orientation and acknowledged she should have sanitized her hands, changed gloves at appropriate times, and not handled the wipe packet with dirty gloves. The DON stated CNA H should not have handled the wipe packet, blanket, or other clean items with soiled gloves and that the contaminated wipe packet should have been discarded.
Failure to Supervise Cognitively Impaired Resident Who Left Facility Unnoticed
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents, resulting in a cognitively impaired resident leaving the building without staff knowledge. The resident was an older male with vascular dementia of unspecified severity, generalized anxiety, and hypertension. His most recent quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and documented that he required supervision or touch assistance for ambulation distances of 10 and 150 feet, although he did not use assistive devices and was independently ambulatory. Despite this documented need for supervision with mobility and his cognitive impairment, the resident was able to exit the facility alone. On the date of the incident, facility incident and accident records documented an elopement for this resident. Interviews and record review showed that the resident left the facility without alerting staff or signing out, walked down the road toward a nearby hospital where his wife was hospitalized, and then stopped at a bank when he became tired. From there, he called a family member, who in turn contacted the facility and learned that staff were unaware the resident had left. The family member reported concern that, although the resident was independent, he was under the facility’s supervision and should not have been able to leave without their knowledge. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was not in his room at mealtime, which was not initially unusual because he often went for coffee, and that staff only became aware he had left when notified that he was being brought back. Multiple staff, including the DON, NP, SW, CNA, and ADM, acknowledged that the resident had not previously exhibited exit-seeking behavior and was considered independent, alert, oriented, and with safety awareness. However, they also confirmed that he knew the exit code and could leave the building, and that the facility did not recognize his departure at the time it occurred. The ADM and DON stated they did not consider this a true elopement because the resident had intent, a plan, and safety awareness, and because he was allowed to walk outside unsupervised. At the same time, the facility had an existing expectation, communicated via an email from the senior vice president of clinical operations, that all residents leaving the building must be documented on a sign-out and sign-back-in log, with staff responsible for ensuring completion of the log before a resident goes out the door. The resident did not sign out, staff did not ensure the log was completed, and the facility did not know he was out of the building until contacted by the family member, demonstrating a failure to provide adequate supervision and to follow its own sign-out expectations to prevent accidents. The email from senior leadership emphasized that the purpose of the sign-out log was to ensure the facility knew when residents were leaving, who they were leaving with, and to address safety concerns, including that not every resident should leave unaccompanied if there were questions about their safety. It also referenced the need to know which residents were in or out of the building during weather events, underscoring the safety rationale for tracking resident whereabouts. The blank sign-out form required the date, time leaving, resident name and signature, the printed name of the person leaving with the resident, staff initials, and the date and time of return with staff initials. In this incident, none of these procedures were followed for the resident who left alone, and staff interviews confirmed that all residents were under the care of the facility and should be supervised with staff aware of their location. The combination of the resident’s moderate cognitive impairment, documented need for supervision with ambulation, and the facility’s failure to monitor his whereabouts or enforce the sign-out process led directly to the deficiency. Overall, the deficiency centers on the facility’s inaction in monitoring and supervising a resident with cognitive impairment and anxiety who was able to exit the building without staff knowledge, contrary to the facility’s own sign-out expectations. The resident’s departure was only discovered when a family member, contacted by the resident from a bank, notified the facility. Staff and leadership interviews confirmed that the resident was allowed to walk outside and knew the exit code, that there was no formal written policy beyond the email directive, and that the event was not reported as an elopement by the facility despite being documented as such in the incident log. These facts demonstrate that the facility did not ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards as possible and did not provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for this resident.
Failure to Maintain Resident Privacy During Personal Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy during personal care. During a bed bath provided by two hospice CNAs, the privacy curtain was drawn, but the door to the shared room was left wide open, making the resident's naked body visible to anyone approaching the room. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all bathing activities, was awake and alert during the incident. Multiple staff members, including a CNA delivering lunch and a housekeeper cleaning the room, entered and exited without ensuring the door was closed, despite the ongoing personal care. Interviews with the involved staff revealed inconsistent recollections about whether the door was closed, with some believing it had been closed initially and others stating it was already open when they entered. The housekeeper admitted he did not consider closing the door and was unsure if he had received training on privacy. The facility's policy and statements from the DON confirmed that privacy should be maintained during personal care by closing doors and curtains, and that staff are expected to be competent in upholding privacy standards.
Failure to Knock on Resident Doors Before Entry
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff consistently honored residents' rights to privacy and dignity by not knocking on residents' doors before entering their rooms. Observations revealed that CNA A entered the rooms of two residents without knocking, and CNA B entered another resident's room without knocking. These actions were directly observed by surveyors during their rounds in the facility. Interviews with the affected residents confirmed that staff did not always knock before entering their rooms. One resident stated that staff do not knock all the time and expressed a preference for staff to knock, especially at night. Another resident reported that staff would sometimes not knock if they had forgotten something and needed to re-enter the room. Although the residents did not express strong feelings of upset, they indicated a preference for staff to knock before entering. Interviews with staff, including CNAs, the DON, and the administrator, revealed that all had been trained on resident rights and acknowledged the expectation to knock before entering residents' rooms. Staff recognized that failing to knock could be perceived as rude and a violation of privacy. The facility's policy also required staff to knock and request permission before entering, but staff could not explain why they failed to do so in these instances.
Failure to Maintain Hand Hygiene and Sanitary Food Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and sanitary food handling practices in the kitchen and during meal tray distribution, as observed by surveyors. Specifically, a kitchen staff member was seen disposing of trash and touching the trashcan lid with bare hands, then returning to food preparation without washing or sanitizing hands. This staff member also handled food and kitchen surfaces without appropriate hand hygiene between tasks, despite posted signs instructing on proper handwashing procedures. The facility's own policies require handwashing after handling trash and before food preparation, but these were not followed during the observed incidents. Additionally, a CNA was observed passing meal trays to multiple residents without performing hand hygiene between residents. The CNA moved from one resident's room to another, delivering food and ice, without using hand sanitizer or washing hands until after several trays had been distributed. The CNA later acknowledged forgetting to perform hand hygiene and recognized its importance in preventing infection. The DON confirmed that it is the responsibility of nursing leadership to ensure staff conduct hand hygiene between each resident when passing trays. The residents involved in these observations included individuals with significant medical conditions such as dementia, Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and severe cognitive impairments. Many of these residents required assistance with eating and were dependent on staff for their care. The failure to follow proper hand hygiene and food safety protocols was observed directly by surveyors and confirmed through interviews with staff and review of facility policies.
Failure to Administer Blood Pressure Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of a resident by not administering prescribed blood pressure medications, Amlodipine and Metoprolol, for eight days following the resident's admission. The resident, an elderly female with a history of atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart attack, and hypertension, was admitted with orders for these medications. However, after an initial administration on the day following admission, the medications were not given again until eight days later, despite the resident's high blood pressure readings during this period. The deficiency arose from a miscommunication between the nurse and the nurse practitioner (NP) regarding the resident's medication orders. The nurse believed the NP had approved the orders, but both medications were inadvertently discontinued due to a verbal miscommunication. This oversight was identified after the resident's representative filed a grievance about the resident's high blood pressure and the discontinuation of medications that were not supposed to be changed.
Inadequate Sanitization of Medical Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by the actions of a medical assistant (MA A) who did not sanitize a wrist blood pressure monitor between uses on two residents. This oversight was observed during a medication administration round on Hall 6, where MA A used the same blood pressure monitor on two residents without cleaning it. The first resident, a female with severe cognitive impairment and multiple health issues including hypertension, had her blood pressure taken without the monitor being sanitized afterward. The second resident, also with severe cognitive impairment and various health conditions, was subjected to the same unsanitized equipment. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged being informed by MA A about the failure to sanitize the equipment but was unaware that this noncompliance extended to all residents on Hall 6. The facility's policy clearly mandates the sanitization of medical equipment between residents, in line with CDC recommendations and OSHA standards. However, a review of in-service records revealed no training sessions on the disinfection of medical equipment had been conducted in the months leading up to the incident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 337 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 20 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cedar Park
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Pointe Health And Wellness Center | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Sagebrook Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| New Hope Manor | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| The Center At Parmer | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| Park Valley Inn Health Center | 5.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Springs Healthcare And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.