Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Heights On Huebner during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Medications and Skin Conditions: The facility’s MDS assessments did not accurately reflect several residents’ medication regimens or skin status. One resident’s quarterly MDS omitted scheduled pain medication, others omitted anticonvulsant, antiplatelet, and hypoglycemic medications documented in the MAR and orders, and an admission MDS undercounted the number of skin issues despite a treatment nurse’s report showing multiple wounds present during the look-back period.
Prohibited items were found in several residents’ rooms, including disposable razors, medical adhesive remover, lidocaine cream, rubbing alcohol, and aerosol lidocaine spray. One resident with dementia and Parkinson’s disease had five disposable razor blades at bedside, another newly admitted resident with weakness and fall risk had razors in the dresser, and two other residents had chemical and topical products on their dressers despite care plans showing they needed staff assistance with personal hygiene and had no orders to self-administer these items.
A resident with a PEG tube, NPO status, and intact cognition had incomplete medication consent documentation for venlafaxine, with one consent missing the signer’s name and another not naming the medication. The MAR and physician orders repeatedly showed oral administration for medications that staff said were always given via G-tube, and the resident’s OOH DNR was not clearly completed because the physician signature was not in the designated area.
The facility failed to maintain infection control during resident care when a CNA used the same pulse oximeter on two residents without proper disinfection, an MA used the same BP cuff on two residents without sanitizing it, an RN allowed a wound bed to touch a bed sheet during wound care and did not restart the procedure, and two CNAs held a catheter bag and tubing above bladder level during care. The DON stated medical equipment should be disinfected between residents, contaminated wound care should be restarted, and catheter drainage should remain below bladder level.
Incomplete OOH DNR Form: A resident with DNR status, heart failure, and vascular dementia had an OOH DNR that was signed by the resident and notarized but lacked the physician's signature. The DON stated the facility would honor a DNR pending physician signature if the form was filled out, while the SW said the form appeared to be pending signature and was unsure whether EMS would honor it without the physician's signature.
Incomplete dialysis communication and documentation: A resident with ESRD, DM, hepatitis C, HF, and dependence on renal dialysis was sent to the dialysis clinic with a Pre-Dialysis Assessment form placed in his lunch because he did not yet have a dialysis binder. The resident did not know what the paper was for, and the form was later found to be incomplete and inconsistent, with missing dialysis-clinic information and no clear completion before scanning into the record. The DON, ADON, and RNs described the form as the key tool for sharing pre- and post-dialysis weights, treatment issues, and other dialysis details, but the facility could not initially locate the original document.
Expired Tracheostomy kits were found in the emergency cart during an observation and interview. RN B, who said he was responsible for daily cart checks, acknowledged there should not be any expired items in the cart. The DON and RN B stated staff would check expiration dates before using items in an emergency, and the crash cart log showed daily inspections were documented.
Improper Storage of Opened and Undated Food Items: An observation of the kitchen found opened and undated celery in the refrigerator, opened sliced ham in the refrigerator, and opened cereal in the pantry. The Dietary Mgr stated undated or unsealed items could be expired and freshness could not be guaranteed, and the Dietitian stated food items should be dated and sealed. Facility policy required opened and bulk items to be tightly covered, labeled, and dated, and refrigerated foods to be dated, labeled, and tightly sealed.
Two residents with severe cognitive and physical impairments had care plans that were not updated to reflect their need for assistance with eating, despite assessments and staff observations indicating they required help at mealtimes. Staff interviews and therapy documentation confirmed the need for feeding assistance, but the care plans inaccurately stated the residents could feed themselves, leading to a deficiency in person-centered care planning.
Staff failed to wear required gowns while providing catheter care to a resident with a suprapubic catheter under enhanced barrier precautions. Both the LVN and CNA involved acknowledged awareness of the policy but did not follow it during the care activity, despite clear signage and prior training. The facility's policy required gown and glove use for residents with indwelling medical devices.
A facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a resident's BiPap use within 48 hours of admission. The resident, who used a BiPap machine nightly, did not have a documented care plan or physician's order for its use. This oversight was acknowledged by the MDS nurse and the DON, who recognized the importance of including BiPap care in the baseline care plan to ensure appropriate care.
A resident using a BiPap device nightly since admission did not have physician's orders for its care, leading to a lack of guidance for facility staff. The resident, with multiple health conditions, used the BiPap independently without assistance from nurses, and the facility lacked a specific policy for BiPap care.
An expired Anasept Gel was found in a treatment cart, with the treatment nurse unaware of its presence. The facility lacked a specific policy on expired medications, though it was expected that nurses discard them.
A medication cart on the 100 Hall was found unattended and unlocked, with keys hanging from the lock, allowing unauthorized access to medications. RN A, responsible for the cart, was not in sight, and although she removed the keys, she did not lock the cart. RN B claimed to check locks routinely but could not recall if the cart was unlocked. The DON and Administrator confirmed that carts should be locked, and keys kept with the responsible nurse, as per facility policy.
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for three residents with indwelling devices, such as a colostomy, foley catheter, and suprapubic catheter. These care plans were only updated after state surveyor intervention, despite facility policy requiring timely updates upon admission and changes in condition.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Medications and Skin Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected resident status for 5 of 11 residents reviewed. The deficiencies involved quarterly or admission MDS assessments that did not match the residents’ medication regimens or skin status documented in the medical record. Facility staff, including the MDS LVN, DON, and MDS RN, stated that the MDS should be accurate because it reflects resident care, supports care planning, and is used for billing. For one resident with diagnoses including stroke, heart disease, epilepsy, depression, anxiety, joint pain, and peripheral vascular disease, the quarterly MDS documented use of several medication classes but did not include scheduled pain medication in the last 5 days, even though the record showed an active order for Tramadol and the January MAR documented it was being administered as prescribed. The same assessment also did not reflect anticonvulsant use, and the order summary showed no active anticonvulsant order. For another resident with dementia, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and hypertension, the quarterly MDS did not include anticonvulsant medication use even though the order summary and MAR showed Depakote was active and being given as prescribed. Two additional residents had quarterly MDS assessments that omitted medication classes documented in their records. One resident with cerebral infarction, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes, depression, hypertension, and PTSD had an active order for Clopidogrel, but the MDS did not document antiplatelet use. Another resident with dementia, kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart disease, hyperlipidemia, and depression had active orders for Aspirin, Insulin Glargine, and Insulin Lispro, but the MDS did not document antiplatelet or hypoglycemic medication use. In addition, the admission MDS for a resident with stroke, type 2 diabetes with retinopathy, legal blindness, and peripheral vascular disease did not reflect the correct number of skin issues; the assessment recorded 2 unstageable pressure injuries and 1 diabetic foot ulcer, while the treatment nurse’s skin report identified 6 skin issues present on admission, and staff acknowledged all 6 wounds were still present during the MDS look-back period.
Prohibited items found in resident rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep resident rooms free of accident hazards by allowing prohibited items to remain at the bedside of multiple residents. Surveyors observed a disposable razor on the dresser in Resident #144’s room and later found another disposable razor in the bottom drawer of the same dresser. Resident #144 stated the razor had been brought in by family and that he had used it that morning during his shower. Resident #144 was newly admitted, had diagnoses including lack of coordination, syncope and collapse, and muscle weakness, and his baseline care plan identified fall risk and a self-care deficit with dressing and grooming assistance needed. Resident #103, a 79-year-old male with dementia, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, unsteadiness on feet, and gait and mobility abnormalities, was observed with a cup at bedside containing five pink-handled disposable razor blades. His quarterly MDS indicated severe cognitive impairment for daily decision-making and need for setup or clean-up assistance with personal hygiene, including shaving. Resident #103 stated the razors were his personal property and that he had used them to shave himself the previous evening during his shower. Resident #4, who had spinal stenosis of the cervical region, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, was observed with a bottle of medical adhesive remover and a bottle of lidocaine pain relief cream on the bedside dresser. Her MDS showed she was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, and her care plan required two-person assistance for dressing and grooming. Resident #26, who had effusion of the left knee, acute diastolic heart failure, and vascular dementia, was observed with rubbing alcohol and aerosol lidocaine spray on top of the dresser in plain sight. His MDS showed he required setup or clean-up assistance for personal hygiene. Facility records stated that medications, ointments, chemical products, flammable products, alcohol, scissors, sharp objects, and aerosol sprays were not permitted in resident rooms unless specifically allowed by care plan.
Incomplete medication consent, inaccurate MAR routes, and unclear DNR documentation
Penalty
Summary
Resident #4’s medical record was incomplete and inaccurately documented in several areas. The resident was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including cervical spinal stenosis, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and post-surgical digestive system aftercare. Her admission MDS showed a BIMS score of 15 and indicated she had a feeding tube. The care plan documented that she was NPO, received enteral nutrition, required EBH precautions related to the PEG tube, and needed staff assistance with positioning and tube-related care. The facility failed to maintain accurate medication consent documentation for venlafaxine. One consent in the EHR was signed by the resident but left blank where the person obtaining permission should have signed. A second copy of the consent, dated 1/8/26, was blank in the section for the psychotropic medication prescribed and stated only that it was for depression; ADON C stated the form should identify the medication so the resident would know what drug she was consenting to. The record also showed active physician orders for venlafaxine with one order written for by mouth and another for PEG-tube administration, even though RN I and ADON C stated the resident always received medications via G-tube and never by mouth. The January 2026 MAR also reflected multiple medications documented as given by mouth despite the resident receiving medications through the G-tube. These included duloxetine, Lokelma, amoxicillin, hydroxyzine, loperamide, and venlafaxine, with several orders showing both oral and PEG-tube routes. In addition, the resident’s out-of-hospital DNR form was not clearly completed: the physician signature was not placed in the designated signature area, and the resident’s signature appeared across the physician line in the lower section of the form. The SW stated the physician signature appeared to be present in both required sections, while the DON stated there was no policy for medical record or nursing documentation and no policy for consent was provided.
Infection Control Failures During Equipment Use, Wound Care, and Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program for multiple residents during observed care activities. Resident #7 had diagnoses including respiratory bronchiolitis interstitial lung disease, heart failure, and respiratory failure, and Resident #97 had diagnoses including morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, and respiratory disorders. During observation, CNA D obtained an oxygen saturation reading on Resident #7 with a pulse oximeter, then used the same pulse oximeter on Resident #97 without sanitizing it between residents. CNA D later stated he used a sanitizing wipe, but the wipe package he presented was for incontinence care, not for disinfecting medical equipment. He then produced a container of germicidal alcohol wipes and stated those were the wipes that should have been used to properly disinfect the pulse oximeter. The facility also failed to sanitize a blood pressure cuff between residents during medication administration. MA E used a wrist blood pressure cuff on Resident #34 and then used the same cuff on Resident #144 without sanitizing it between uses. MA E stated the cuff was her personal equipment used throughout the shift and that she had not thought about sanitizing it between residents and was not sure how to do it. The DON stated it was the expectation that medical equipment such as pulse oximeters and blood pressure cuffs be disinfected prior to use and between residents, and that incontinent wipes should not be used to clean medical equipment. The facility’s cleaning and disinfecting procedure identified blood pressure cuffs as non-critical resident-care items that are to be cleaned and disinfected between residents. Resident #4 had an indwelling catheter, a sacral pressure injury, and a surgical wound to the right shoulder. During wound care, RN L cleansed the sacral wound bed, removed and replaced gloves, and continued the procedure while CNA J assisted with positioning. CNA J allowed the resident to roll backward, and the wound bed came into contact with the bed sheet. The wound bed was not cleansed again after touching the sheet. RN L stated the sheet would be considered contaminated and the wound bed should be cleansed again if it touched the sheet. In a separate observation, CNA J and CNA K provided incontinent and catheter care to Resident #4 and then held the catheter bag and tubing above bladder level while repositioning the resident. Both CNAs stated they did not notice this during care, and the DON stated the catheter bag and tubing should not be held above the bladder because it could put urine back into the bladder and potentially place the resident at risk of infection.
Incomplete OOH DNR Form
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #26 had a complete and valid out-of-hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH DNR) order available for emergency use. Resident #26 was admitted with diagnoses including effusion of the left knee, acute diastolic heart failure, and vascular dementia. The admission record identified the resident's advance directive as DNR, and the quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition for daily decision making. The care plan included a focus area for advance directives and stated that the resident's code status was DNR and that advance directives, care wishes, and code status would be respected and honored as indicated. Record review of the physician order summary showed an order for DNR with no end date. However, the resident's OOH DNR form was signed by the resident and notarized but did not contain a physician's signature. During interview, the DON stated DNRs were kept in the electronic health record and that the facility would honor a DNR pending the physician's signature if the form was filled out. The SW stated the resident's DNR appeared to be pending the physician's signature, that she may have attempted to obtain the medical director's signature, and that she was unsure whether EMS would honor a DNR without a physician's signature. The facility policy stated the nurse should obtain a physician's order and the IDT should obtain the medical provider/physician's signature on the OOH DNR form.
Incomplete dialysis communication and documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe, appropriate dialysis care for a resident with end stage renal disease, diabetes, chronic hepatitis C, heart failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident #148 was ordered to receive dialysis at a clinic on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and the care plan directed staff to coordinate transportation to and from dialysis and monitor for signs of infection or bleeding at the access site. The resident had a left arm fistula and had recently been admitted to the facility. On 1/12/26, a Pre-Dialysis Assessment form was prepared by RN A and sent with the resident in his sack lunch because he did not yet have a dialysis binder. RN A stated she entered the pre-dialysis vital signs and expected the resident to give the form to dialysis staff, who would complete their portion and return it with the resident. The resident later stated he found a folded piece of paper in his lunch, did not know what it was for, and was not told what to do with it. He showed the surveyor the form, which contained his name, current vital signs, and post-dialysis weight and vital signs information signed by the dialysis clinic RN. During record review and interviews, the facility could not initially locate the original Pre-Dialysis Assessment form, and the document presented by RN B did not match the copy shown by the resident. RN B stated the form was missing information that should have been provided by dialysis staff and that he was responsible for checking the form for completeness and accuracy before it was scanned into the record. The DON and ADON C stated the form was intended to document pre- and post-dialysis weights, treatment issues, and any additional orders or restrictions, and that it should not be scanned until completed. The DON later stated the facility did not have a policy regarding documenting post-dialysis vitals on the form, although those vitals were documented in the electronic record.
Expired Tracheostomy Kits Found in Emergency Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 emergency care cart reviewed. During an observation and interview, the emergency cart was found to contain two packages of Tracheostomy Clean and Care Kits, and both packages were expired. One kit had an expiration date of [DATE], and the other had an expiration date of 12/2024. RN B stated he was responsible for stocking the emergency cart and checking it every day, and he acknowledged that there should not be any expired items in the emergency cart. During the inspection, the DON stated that if items were taken from the emergency cart during an emergency, the nurse would be checking the expiration date before use. RN B also stated that if a nurse needed to take supplies from the emergency cart during an emergency, they would be checking for expiration dates. On follow-up interview, RN B stated the emergency cart inspected did not have any medications in it and that the facility did not currently have any residents with tracheostomies. Record review showed the crash cart inspection log required daily validation that supplies were available and that the cart was ready for emergency use, and the log reflected daily initials documenting inspection from [DATE] to [DATE].
Improper Storage of Opened and Undated Food Items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. During an observation of the kitchen, a bag of celery stalks was found opened and undated in the refrigerator, a bag of sliced ham was found opened in the refrigerator, and a bag of cereal was found opened in the pantry. During interview, the Dietary Manager stated she would have staff remove undated and unsealed items from the refrigerator and pantry, and stated that if items were undated or unsealed, they could be expired and freshness could not be guaranteed. The Dietitian stated it was important for food items to be dated and sealed to keep things from expiring. Record review of the facility policy titled Food Storage stated that all food served by the facility is to be stored according to state, federal, and US Food Codes and HACCP guidelines, and that opened and bulk items in dry storage must be tightly covered, labeled, and dated, and refrigerated foods must be dated, labeled, and tightly sealed.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Residents Needing Feeding Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two residents with significant cognitive and physical impairments. Both residents had documented needs for assistance with eating, as evidenced by their medical diagnoses, MDS assessments indicating severely impaired cognition, and therapy evaluations showing the need for supervision or physical help during meals. Despite this, their care plans inaccurately stated that they were able to feed themselves without physical assistance, only noting that they might need help preparing their trays or drinks. These care plans were not updated to reflect the residents' actual needs for feeding assistance, as confirmed by multiple staff interviews and therapy documentation. Staff interviews revealed that both residents regularly required help with eating, with some days necessitating full assistance throughout the meal. Nursing and therapy staff acknowledged the importance of providing this support for safety and nutritional reasons. The facility's process for updating care plans was described as challenging, with oversight sometimes resulting in missed updates. The care plans serve as the basis for the Kardex, which guides CNAs in resident care, and the lack of accurate, updated information in these documents led to the deficiency cited by surveyors.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow established infection prevention and control protocols during the provision of catheter care to a resident with a suprapubic catheter who was under enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Specifically, an LVN and a CNA were observed performing catheter care while wearing gloves but not gowns, despite an EBP sign being posted outside the resident's door and a physician's order for EBP related to the suprapubic catheter. Both staff members acknowledged during interviews that they were aware of the requirement to wear gowns in addition to gloves for residents on EBP, citing prior training, but stated they had forgotten to don the gowns during the care activity. The resident involved had a history of cerebral palsy and obstructive and reflux uropathy, and was assessed as having an indwelling suprapubic catheter. The facility's infection prevention and control policy, revised in April 2024, required the use of gown and gloves for high-contact care activities involving residents with indwelling medical devices, regardless of MDRO colonization status. The Director of Nursing Services confirmed that staff should have worn both gown and gloves during the care and that failure to do so was not in accordance with facility policy.
Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plan for BiPap Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed and provided for a resident within 48 hours of admission, specifically regarding the resident's BiPap care. The resident, a female with intact cognitive function, was admitted with a BiPap machine, which she used every night for sleeping. Despite this, there was no baseline care plan or physician's order for the BiPap care documented within the required timeframe. This oversight was acknowledged by the MDS nurse, who admitted to missing the BiPap care in the baseline care plan. The deficiency was identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews. The resident's room contained a BiPap machine, and both the resident and a CNA confirmed its nightly use since admission. The MDS nurse and the DON both recognized the importance of including the BiPap care in the baseline care plan to ensure appropriate care. The facility's policy required the care plan to be initiated upon admission and developed within 48 to 72 hours, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Physician-Ordered BiPap Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care for a resident who required BiPap (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) support every night since admission. The resident, a female with a history of vertebral fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and muscle wasting, did not have any physician's orders regarding her BiPap care. Despite using the BiPap nightly, there was no baseline care plan or physician's orders to guide the facility staff on how to set up the machine or care for the tubing. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident brought the BiPap from home and used it independently, without assistance from facility nurses. The MDS nurse and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of physician's orders and the lack of a specific policy regarding BiPap care. This oversight could potentially lead to inadequate care for residents using BiPap devices, as the facility staff lacked guidance on providing appropriate care.
Expired Medication Found in Treatment Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services by not ensuring the removal of expired medications from a treatment cart. During an observation on October 31, 2024, an expired medication, Anasept Gel, which expired on September 14, 2023, was found in the treatment cart. A treatment nurse, LVN-C, acknowledged the presence of the expired gel and admitted to not knowing why it was still in the cart, despite the facility's expectation that nurses discard expired medications. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no specific policy regarding expired medications, but reiterated that expired medications should be discarded from medication carts. A review of the facility's policy on medication cart use and storage did not specifically address the handling of expired medications.
Medication Cart Security Breach
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments, as required by professional principles. During an observation, a medication cart on the 100 Hall was found unattended and unlocked, with keys hanging from the lock outside the nurses' station. The drawers of the cart were facing outward, allowing anyone passing by to access the medications. RN A, who was responsible for the cart, was not in sight, and although she removed the keys from the lock, she did not secure the cart. This situation was observed by a surveyor, who noted that an unidentified male visitor walked by the unlocked cart. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in the handling of the medication cart. RN B, who was also working on the 100 Hall, claimed to routinely check the locks on medication carts but could not recall if the cart was unlocked when she passed by. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator both confirmed that medication carts should be locked and keys kept with the responsible nurse or medication aide. The facility's Medication Cart Use & Storage Policy mandates that carts remain locked except during medication administration, and keys should be in the possession of the nurse or medication aide until the next shift.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans for Residents with Indwelling Devices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for three residents, which described the services needed to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #5's care plan did not indicate that she had a colostomy, despite having surgery for it three to four months prior and requiring specific care for the colostomy as per physician orders. Similarly, Resident #6's care plan did not include his foley catheter, which had been in place since mid-April, and Resident #7's care plan did not mention his suprapubic catheter, which was ordered in early May. These care plans were only updated after state surveyor intervention on May 14, 2024. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the DON revealed that care plans should be updated upon admission and within twenty-four hours of any changes in the resident's condition. The facility's policy also stated that care plans should be initiated upon admission and continuously developed during the initial 48-72 hours. The failure to include these indwelling devices in the residents' care plans could place them at risk of not having their needs identified and appropriate interventions established. The MDS Coordinator admitted to updating the care plans only after the state investigator's arrival, indicating a lapse in adhering to the facility's policy and expectations for timely and accurate care planning.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 935 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 20 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near San Antonio
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot Heights Health Care Center | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 1 |
| Remington Transitional Care Of San Antonio | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Wurzbach Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Ignite Medical Resort San Antonio, Llc | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 26 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Heights On Huebner.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.