Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Southpark Meadows Nursing And Rehabilitation Cente during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to follow infection control procedures during resident care and wound care was observed for four residents. An LVN did not remove a gown after wound care and returned to the room wearing the same PPE, another LVN did not change gloves after a blood sugar check before touching the door and cart, and two CNAs did not remove contaminated gloves during peri-care and catheter care. The residents had significant medical conditions including diabetes, dementia, cerebral palsy, sepsis, and a venous ulcer.
MDS assessments for two residents did not accurately reflect current tobacco use. Although both residents’ care plans and smoking safety screens identified them as smokers who required supervision while smoking, their MDS records marked tobacco use as no. Interviews with the MDS Nurse, SW, and ADM confirmed smoking status should be included on the MDS, but none could explain why it was omitted.
A resident was admitted with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder, but the PASRR Level 1 screening was marked negative for mental illness, ID, and DD. The MDS record and care plan documented mental health concerns and antipsychotic use related to bipolar disease, and staff interviews confirmed that these diagnoses should have triggered a positive PASRR Level 1 and possible Level 2 review.
Drinks Not Kept Within Reach for Two Residents: Two residents were observed without water or other fluids within reach in their rooms on multiple occasions. One resident with Alzheimer’s disease, DM2, and CHF was found in bed with dry lips and her water pitcher and cup placed several feet away; another resident with acute kidney failure, vascular dementia, and major cognitive impairment had no fluids present in the room during one observation and a cup of water placed out of reach during another. Staff, including CNA staff, the DON, and the ADM, stated residents should have liquids within reach and that CNAs were responsible for ensuring drinks were available.
A resident with dementia, CKD, and depression had a consultant pharmacist review note and physician response agreeing to discontinue PRN Hydroxyzine for anxiety, but the order was not transcribed out of the EMR. The MAR continued to list the medication as active even though it was not administered, and interviews with the RP, ADON, DON, and ADM confirmed the transcription error.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of multiple medical conditions was diagnosed twice with C. diff, resulting in persistent and worsening diarrhea. Despite this, staff continued to administer a daily laxative and did not notify the NP of the resident's condition or medication use, contrary to the care plan and facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the situation, but no action was taken to inform the NP or adjust treatment.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of C. diff infection continued to receive a daily laxative despite ongoing, significant diarrhea and rapid weight loss. Staff observed the resident's worsening symptoms but did not notify the NP or discontinue the medication, leading to severe dehydration, acute kidney injury, and hospitalization. Facility policies requiring physician notification for significant changes were not followed, and the resident's care plan interventions were not implemented.
A resident with hemiplegia and a history of refusing care and medication did not have a comprehensive care plan addressing an orthopedic order for a left arm sling or their repeated refusals of care. Despite staff awareness and discussion of the resident's noncompliance and preferences, these issues were not documented in the care plan, resulting in unmet needs and lack of measurable objectives or interventions.
The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for eight residents, violating resident rights. Observations showed call lights were often placed out of reach, preventing residents from calling for assistance. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the requirement, but the deficiency persisted, affecting residents with various medical conditions.
A resident's privacy was compromised when RN C left electronic medical records visible on an unattended computer screen during medication administration. This occurred twice, exposing the resident's protected health information to unauthorized access. The resident, who has cognitive impairments, was unable to advocate for her privacy rights. Interviews confirmed the breach as a HIPAA violation.
A facility failed to secure medications and manage expired supplies, as observed with an unlocked medication cart and expired IV kits. A resident with cognitive impairments was involved when the cart was left unattended, and another resident had unsecured prescription medications in his room. Staff acknowledged these lapses, highlighting risks of unauthorized access and outdated supplies.
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for four residents, leading to potential risks to their confidentiality and rights. A resident's MPOA was incomplete, another's OOH-DNR was missing, a third resident's code status was not evident, and a fourth resident's records were misfiled. These deficiencies were attributed to errors by staff, including the BOM, SW, and an LVN, and were exacerbated by a high volume of admissions and discharges.
A facility failed to enter necessary orders for a resident's indwelling catheter upon admission, leading to a lack of documented care planning. The admitting nurse did not enter catheter-related orders into the EMR, and this omission was not caught in subsequent reviews. Interviews with the DON and ADM confirmed the responsibility for entering and verifying these orders, though no immediate negative impact was observed as the resident's urine was clear and catheter placement was correct.
A resident admitted to the facility did not receive his prescribed temazepam for insomnia on his first night due to a delay in entering medication orders into the EMR. The LVN prioritized other tasks, and although the medication was later offered from the emergency kit, it was too late for the resident to take it comfortably. The DON and ADM acknowledged the need for immediate entry of medication orders to prevent such issues.
A resident did not receive her prescribed medications for anxiety, depression, agitation, and insomnia for four days after admission, leading to exacerbated symptoms of confusion and agitation. Staff noted her increased agitation and confusion, and the ADON acknowledged the responsibility to ensure medications were available upon admission. The facility's policy required clear medication orders, but the resident's medications were not administered timely, and there was a lack of documentation regarding the issue.
Failure to Follow Infection Control During Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four residents reviewed for infection control. Survey observations and record review showed that staff did not consistently follow hand hygiene and personal protective equipment procedures during direct resident care and wound care. During wound care for a resident with a left calf venous ulcer, an LVN removed the contaminated dressing, cleaned the wound, and then removed gloves and sanitized hands but did not remove the gown before leaving the room. The LVN exited the room, opened the treatment cart, removed medication, and returned to the resident’s room wearing the same gown. The resident had diagnoses including idiopathic gout, chronic kidney disease, venous thrombosis, and embolism, and the wound order called for cleansing the wound, applying topical antibiotic ointment, and covering with a dry dressing. During blood sugar care for another resident with hemiplegia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and depression, an LVN completed the blood sugar check and then did not change gloves before touching the doorknob and nursing cart after leaving the room. During peri-care for a resident with sepsis, macular degeneration, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dementia, a CNA did not remove contaminated gloves after cleaning the urinary catheter and performed additional care, including pulling the resident’s clothes and transferring the resident to a wheelchair, while still wearing the same gloves. During peri-care for a resident with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, dementia, and gastroparesis, a CNA did not remove contaminated gloves between front and back peri-care and touched and removed wipes from the package with contaminated gloves. The DON and ADM stated that hand hygiene and changing gloves are required during resident care, and staff interviews confirmed they had been trained on these procedures.
MDS Did Not Accurately Reflect Smoking Status for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the MDS accurately reflected smoking status for two residents. Resident #45’s admission MDS marked current tobacco use as no, even though the care plan identified the resident as a smoker and stated the resident required supervision while smoking. The Smoking Safety Screen also documented that the resident had dexterity and was to be supervised while smoking. Resident #45 was a [AGE]-year-old male admitted with diagnoses including lack of coordination, muscle wasting, attention and concentration deficit, cognitive communication deficit, pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting the right dominant side. Resident #105’s annual MDS also marked current tobacco use as no, although the care plan identified the resident as a smoker and stated the resident required supervision while smoking. The Smoking Safety Screen documented that the resident was to be supervised while smoking. Resident #105 was a [AGE]-year-old male admitted with diagnoses including lack of coordination, muscle wasting, altered mental state, personal history of traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, seizures, and repeated falls. Both residents had BIMS scores indicating moderate impairment, with Resident #45 scoring 12 and Resident #105 scoring 11. During interviews, the MDS Nurse stated she was responsible for completing the MDS and said smoking status was to be included, but she did not know why the two residents’ smoking status was not on the MDS. The SW stated she was responsible for the MDS with the MDS Nurse and ADM, but said she did not know if smoking status went on the MDS and did not inform the MDS Nurse when a resident was a smoker. The ADM stated smoking status should be on the MDS and said he did not know why the two residents’ smoking status was not documented. The CMS RAI 3.0 User’s Manual excerpt included in the report states that current tobacco use should be coded based on resident report or other indications of tobacco use during the look-back period.
Inaccurate PASRR Level 1 Screening for Resident with Mental Health Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an accurate PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #5 after admission. Resident #5 was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, bipolar disorder unspecified, and major depressive disorder. Record review showed the resident’s PASRR Level 1 screening, dated 10/16/2024 and completed by the director of social services, reflected the resident was negative for mental illness, intellectual disability, and developmental disability, even though the resident had documented mental health diagnoses in the record. The quarterly MDS assessment dated 08/27/2025 did not reflect a diagnosis requiring a PASRR II screening. The resident’s care plan, last revised 07/30/2025, identified a potential for behavior problems related to bipolar disorder and depression and noted antipsychotic medication use related to bipolar disease. During interviews, the MDS A stated that bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, IDD, and major depressive disorder would indicate a positive Level 1 PASRR screening, and that a resident admitted with a negative PASRR Level 1 who had a diagnosis would require a new PASRR screening. The DON and ADM both stated that the MDS team was responsible for verifying that the PASRR screening was correct and that an incorrect screening could negatively affect the resident by not receiving a Level 2 screening for potential related services.
Drinks Not Kept Within Reach for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that drinks, including water and other liquids, were provided consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain hydration for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for hydration. The deficiency involved Resident #36 and Resident #110, both of whom were observed without water within reach in their rooms on multiple occasions during the survey process. The report states that this failure placed the two residents at risk for thirst, dehydration, UTI's, and decreased quality of life. Resident #36 was a female with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure. Her care plan directed staff to offer extra fluids with and between meals and to monitor fluid intake. The most recent MDS indicated severe impairment and extensive assistance with bed mobility and ADLs. During observations, she was lying in bed, confused, sleepy, and unable to answer questions, with dry lips. Her water pitcher and empty glass were observed on a dresser table about 5 to 6 feet from her bed, beyond her reach, and on another observation no hydration was located within reach, with a cup less than 1/8 filled and still 5 to 6 feet away. Resident #110 was a female with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, vascular dementia, and major depressive disorder. Her care plan noted impaired visual function and an ADL self-care performance deficit, and the MDS showed severe cognitive impairment and dependence for mobility. She was observed in bed and was not interviewable, with no water cups or fluid containers present in her room during one observation and a cup of water later found about 4 feet from her bed and out of reach. Although she was later observed drinking iced tea independently in the dining room, staff interviews stated that residents should have liquids within reach, that CNAs were responsible for ensuring drinks were available, and that fluids should be placed close to residents. The DON and ADM stated they did not know why the residents did not have drinks within reach.
Inaccurate transcription of discontinued PRN medication order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one resident reviewed for pharmacy services. Resident #86, an elderly female with dementia, chronic kidney disease, and depression, had a quarterly MDS showing a BIMS score of 2 and a care plan noting use of anti-anxiety medication related to an anxiety disorder. Her order summary still listed Hydroxyzine HCl 25 mg every 24 hours as needed for anxiety given prior to personal care as an active order. A consultant pharmacist communication dated 07/17/2025 documented that the resident had been taking Hydroxyzine 25 mg PRN since 07/30/2025 and noted that PRN psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days unless the prescriber documents a rationale and duration. The physician marked agreement to discontinue the medication and signed the communication on 08/14/2025, but the order was not transcribed out of the resident’s electronic medical record. The MAR for August and September 2025 continued to show Hydroxyzine as an active order, although it was not administered during that time. Interviews with the RP, ADON, DON, and ADM confirmed that the updated discontinuation order was not accurately transcribed and that the ADON was responsible for entering consultant pharmacist and physician orders into the record.
Failure to Notify NP of Significant Change and Continued Laxative Use During C. diff Infection
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately notify a resident's nurse practitioner (NP) when the resident experienced a significant change in physical status, specifically after being diagnosed with Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infection on two separate occasions in May 2025. Despite the resident's care plan indicating the need to notify the physician if persistent diarrhea occurred, and lab results confirming C. diff, the NP was not informed of the increased diarrhea or the continued administration of a laxative (Bisacodyl) prescribed for constipation. The medication was given daily as per the medication administration record, even as the resident experienced worsening diarrhea. Interviews with staff revealed that the certified nursing assistant (CNA) and medication aide (MA) were aware of the resident's excessive diarrhea, and the MA expressed concern about administering the laxative but deferred to the licensed vocational nurse (LVN). The LVN acknowledged awareness of the diarrhea and the ongoing laxative order but did not notify the NP, believing it was acceptable due to the C. diff diagnosis. The director of nursing (DON) stated that nurses were expected to notify the NP immediately in such cases. The facility's policy required prompt physician notification when treatment needed to be altered due to adverse consequences.
Failure to Discontinue Laxative During C. diff Infection Resulting in Severe Weight Loss and Dehydration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards, the resident's care plan, and the resident's preferences for one resident diagnosed with C. diff on two occasions. Despite the resident experiencing persistent and severe diarrhea, the facility continued to administer a prescribed laxative (Bisacodyl) daily, as ordered for constipation, without reassessment or discontinuation. The resident's care plan included an intervention to notify the physician if persistent diarrhea occurred, but this was not done. Multiple staff members, including nursing assistants and medication aides, observed the resident's ongoing diarrhea and significant weight loss, but did not ensure that the nurse practitioner was notified or that the laxative was discontinued. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and always incontinent of bowel, experienced a dramatic weight loss of 25 pounds (27.8%) over approximately six weeks, as well as dehydration, elevated troponin levels, and acute kidney injury. Laboratory results confirmed repeated C. diff infections, and hospital records documented acute kidney injury, dehydration, and uremia. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and follow-through regarding the resident's symptoms and weight loss, with some staff assuming others would notify the nurse practitioner or that the symptoms were expected due to the C. diff diagnosis. The facility's policies required prompt notification of the physician for significant changes in condition, including persistent diarrhea and significant weight loss, but these policies were not followed. The nurse practitioner was not made aware of the continued administration of the laxative or the extent of the resident's symptoms and weight loss. As a result, the resident continued to receive a medication that likely exacerbated her diarrhea and contributed to her decline, without appropriate clinical reassessment or intervention.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident with Orthopedic and Behavioral Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with significant medical needs. Specifically, the care plan did not address the resident's orthopedic order for a left arm sling prescribed for comfort, nor did it include the resident's history of refusing care and medication. Despite multiple documented instances in the medical record of the resident refusing medications, care, and the use of the prescribed sling, these issues were not reflected in the care plan, leaving gaps in the documentation of measurable objectives and interventions tailored to the resident's needs. The resident in question was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and cerebral infarction, resulting in impairment of one side of both upper and lower extremities. The resident was cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 13, and had a documented order for a left arm sling to be used for comfort and healing. Nursing notes repeatedly documented the resident's refusals of care, medication, and the use of the sling, as well as his preferences for a specific type of sling. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident's noncompliance and preferences were discussed in daily meetings, but this information was not incorporated into the care plan. Interviews with facility staff, including LVNs, the MDS Coordinator, the DON, and the Administrator, revealed a lack of clarity and follow-through regarding responsibility for updating care plans. While staff acknowledged that the resident's use of the sling and history of refusals should have been included in the care plan, this was not done. The facility's own policy required comprehensive care plans with measurable objectives and time frames to address all identified needs, but this was not followed in the resident's case.
Call Light Accessibility Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the call lights were within reach for eight residents, which is a violation of resident rights. Observations and interviews revealed that the call lights for these residents were often placed out of reach, preventing them from calling for assistance when needed. This deficiency was noted for residents with various medical conditions, including dementia, Parkinson's disease, and other cognitive and physical impairments, who required substantial or maximal assistance with daily activities. For instance, Resident #76's call light was observed hanging on a privacy curtain, approximately three feet away, making it inaccessible. Similarly, Resident #38's call light was placed on a table out of reach, and Resident #52's call light was wrapped around a lowered bedrail, preventing access. Interviews with these residents confirmed that their call lights were frequently out of reach, hindering their ability to request help. Staff interviews, including those with the DON, LVN, and CNAs, indicated that they were aware of the requirement for call lights to be within reach but could not explain why this was not consistently implemented. The facility's policy on call light accessibility emphasized the importance of having call lights within reach to ensure residents' needs are met promptly. Despite this policy, the deficiency persisted, as evidenced by the observations and resident interviews.
Resident Privacy Breach Due to Unattended Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the privacy of a resident's personal and medical records, specifically leaving electronic medical records visible to unauthorized individuals. During medication administration, RN C left the computer screen unlocked and unattended, displaying the resident's personal medical information. This occurred on two separate occasions, once while RN C was administering medication and again when RN C left the medication cart unattended. These actions resulted in the resident's protected health information being exposed to potential unauthorized access. The resident involved was an elderly female with a history of cerebral infarction, flaccid hemiplegia, hypertension, vascular dementia, and other medical conditions. Observations revealed that the resident was unable to answer questions about her right to privacy, indicating impaired cognitive function. Interviews with RN C and the Director of Nursing confirmed the breach of privacy, acknowledging that leaving medical information visible was a violation of HIPAA regulations.
Medication Security and Expired Supplies Lapses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the security and proper storage of medications, as evidenced by multiple observations of an unlocked medication cart and expired supplies. On two separate occasions, staff left Medication Cart A unlocked while administering medications to a resident, with keys left on top of the cart. This oversight was acknowledged by RN A, who admitted that leaving the cart unlocked posed a risk to residents. Additionally, expired IV Start Kits were found in the medication room, indicating a lapse in monitoring and removing outdated supplies. Resident #4, who has a history of cerebral infarction, dementia, and other significant health issues, was involved in one of the incidents where the medication cart was left unattended. The resident's care plan highlighted the need for careful medication administration and monitoring due to cognitive impairments. Another resident, Resident #151, had prescription medications left unsecured on a windowsill in his room, which were brought in by a friend. This resident, who suffers from anxiety disorder and other health conditions, did not intend harm but failed to consider the potential risks of leaving medications accessible. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and ADM, revealed acknowledgment of the lapses in medication security and expired supply management. The DON admitted to overlooking the expired IV kits and emphasized the importance of keeping medication carts locked. The ADM expressed concerns about the potential for undesirable interactions or unauthorized access to medications. The facility's policy on expiration dating and expired medications was not adhered to, as expired items were found in the medication room.
Incomplete and Misfiled Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for four residents, leading to potential risks to their confidentiality and rights. For Resident #8, the facility did not ensure that a legal Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) was present in the clinical record. The uploaded MPOA lacked a date, signature, and notary seal, which was attributed to a family member sending the wrong form and the Business Office Manager (BOM) uploading it by accident. This oversight could have resulted in the resident not receiving the care they desired. Resident #81's clinical record was missing a legal Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) form, despite the resident's profile indicating a DNR status and a physician's order confirming it. The Social Worker (SW) was unsure if she was responsible for uploading the OOH-DNR, as it was typically linked to the code status order at admission. The absence of this document could have led to the resident's wishes not being observed. For Resident #206, the code status was not evident in the clinical record, as the admitting Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) forgot to enter it due to being busy. This omission could have delayed emergency treatment. Additionally, Resident #217's hospital records were incorrectly filed in the clinical records of two other residents, which was attributed to the high volume of admissions and discharges. This misfiling could have resulted in a violation of HIPAA or incorrect clinical information being used for patient care.
Failure to Enter Catheter Orders for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident who entered with an indwelling catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence. Upon admission, the resident's baseline care plan indicated the presence of an indwelling catheter, but no specific care planning options were checked or triggered. Additionally, there were no physician orders related to the catheter entered into the electronic medical record (EMR), which was confirmed during a review of the physician's order summary. This oversight was attributed to an error by the admitting nurse, who acknowledged the importance of having catheter-related orders to inform staff of the resident's needs. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator (ADM) revealed that the admitting nurse was responsible for entering the orders, and the nurse management team was responsible for ensuring these orders were in place. Despite the lack of orders, the DON assessed the resident and found no immediate negative impact, as the urine was clear and the catheter placement was appropriate. However, the absence of a catheter policy and the failure to catch the omission during the morning meeting highlighted a lapse in the facility's processes for managing catheter care upon admission.
Failure to Administer Sleep Medication on Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs to a resident upon admission, specifically failing to administer temazepam for insomnia on the first night. The resident, a male with multiple diagnoses including insomnia, was admitted in the evening and did not receive his prescribed sleep medication due to a delay in entering medication orders into the electronic medical record (EMR). The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of communication between the hospital and the nursing facility, which resulted in him not receiving his nighttime medication and experiencing poor sleep. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) responsible for the admission prioritized other tasks over entering the medication orders, which led to the delay. Although the LVN later offered the medication from the emergency kit, it was too late for the resident to feel comfortable taking it. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator (ADM) acknowledged that the medication orders should have been entered immediately upon admission to prevent such issues. The facility's policy on entering physician orders was requested but not provided, indicating a possible gap in procedural compliance.
Failure to Administer Prescribed Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services to a resident, resulting in the resident not receiving her prescribed medications for anxiety, depression, agitation, and insomnia for four days following her admission. The resident, who had a history of agitation, anxiety disorder, depression, stroke, and cognitive communication deficit, was admitted with specific medication orders that were not fulfilled. The resident's electronic medical record (EMR) and medication administration record (MAR) indicated that she did not receive Clonazepam, Duloxetine, Zyprexa, and Melatonin as prescribed, leading to exacerbated symptoms of confusion and agitation. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident was visibly agitated, distressed, and reported not having slept for two days. Staff members, including a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), noted the resident's increased agitation and confusion since her admission. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged that the nurse management team was responsible for ensuring medications were available upon admission and stated that it was unacceptable for residents to go multiple days without their medications. The ADON was unaware that the resident had been without her medications and was uncertain if the medications were available in the emergency medication kit. The facility's Medication Orders Policy required medications to be administered only upon a clear and complete order, with emergency orders necessitating direct communication between a nurse and a pharmacist. Despite this policy, the resident's medications were not administered in a timely manner, and there was a lack of documentation in the progress notes regarding the medication issue. The failure to administer the prescribed medications led to the resident's increased anxiety and agitation, as observed by the staff and documented in the progress notes.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 323 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 19 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Austin
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onion Creek Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Brodie Ranch Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 1 |
| West Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Marbridge Villa | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Brush Country Nursing And Rehabilitation | 4.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 23 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Southpark Meadows Nursing And Rehabilitation Cente.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.