Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Dogwood Trails Manor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia, DM2, AFib, and HTN, who was documented as cognitively intact and able to communicate, had her Android cell phone taken by a housekeeping staff member. The phone was initially reported missing and searched for within the facility, but the resident’s out-of-state family, who managed the phone account, later received unusual emails from the phone provider. Email records showed that the staff member used the resident’s phone/account to add cloud services, place an iPhone 17 Pro Max in the cart, complete an order for an iPhone 15 billed to the family, change the account password, remove the account manager, and alter the mailing/billing address to his own. The delivery address for the ordered iPhone 15 matched the staff member’s home address, and he had been working on the day the phone went missing.
A resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including dementia and pulmonary disease, was admitted without a baseline care plan being developed within 48 hours. The admitting LVN did not initiate the required plan, and there was confusion among staff about who was responsible for this task. As a result, the resident's immediate care needs were not formally documented or communicated to staff during the critical initial period after admission.
The facility did not accurately code MDS assessments for two residents, failing to document dialysis care for a resident with ESRD and hospice care for another resident with a terminal diagnosis, despite supporting documentation in medical records and care plans. The errors were attributed to missing documentation at the time of assessment and data entry mistakes by the MDS Coordinator.
A resident with end stage renal disease had an increase in dialysis treatments from two to three times per week, as documented by the dialysis center and confirmed by staff interviews. However, the physician's orders in the electronic health record were not updated to reflect this change, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical documentation.
A resident requiring enhanced barrier precautions did not receive appropriate infection control measures when a CNA entered the room without hand hygiene or PPE, despite posted signage. The CNA was unaware of EBP requirements and had not been trained, and the facility lacked documentation and orientation on EBP for new hires, as confirmed by the IP nurse and business office manager.
Staff were not provided with mandatory training on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as required by the facility's infection control program. A CNA entered a resident's room with EBP signage and PPE available but did not sanitize hands or use appropriate PPE before providing ADL care. The CNA was unaware of EBP requirements and had not received training. The IP nurse confirmed a lack of training documentation, and the business office manager stated new hires had not been trained or checked off on EBP. The new hire orientation checklist did not address EBP, despite facility policy requiring such training.
A deficiency was cited due to the facility's failure to ensure an area was free from accident hazards and to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The report highlights that the environment did not meet safety standards, increasing the risk of accidents.
The facility did not promptly report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft, nor did it communicate the results of its investigation to the proper authorities as required.
The facility did not ensure that the Controlled Drugs Audit Record for a nurses' medication cart was consistently signed before and after each shift over several months, resulting in 28 missing nurse signatures. Despite policy requiring two licensed nurses or a nurse and a CMA to count and sign for controlled medications at each shift change, audit records showed repeated lapses in obtaining signatures, and staff interviews confirmed the process was not always followed or monitored.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and on hospice care experienced a misappropriation of liquid morphine sulfate when a narcotic count revealed missing medication. The discrepancy was discovered during a shift change, prompting an internal investigation involving staff interviews and drug screens. Some staff refused testing or could not be located, and one nurse suspected of diversion left the facility and did not return for a drug screen. The incident was reported to authorities and investigated according to facility protocol.
Two residents with severe cognitive impairment and behavioral symptoms did not have comprehensive, person-centered care plans addressing their verbal and physical behaviors. Despite regular documentation of agitation, disruptive vocalizations, and confrontational actions, the care plans either omitted these behaviors or lacked individualized interventions and measurable goals, contrary to facility policy and staff expectations.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment sustained multiple ant bites after ants were repeatedly found in their room, along with food crumbs and open food. Despite cleaning and pest control efforts, live ant activity persisted, and untreated ant mounds were later observed on facility grounds. Staff interviews confirmed that lapses in pest control and monitoring contributed to the incident.
The facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage for several days due to a gap between the departure of the previous DON and the start of the new DON. During this period, shifts worked by RNs did not meet the required hours, and the facility lacked a staffing policy to ensure compliance.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions did not receive necessary nail care, as evidenced by a persistent dark brown substance under his fingernails. Despite a care plan and facility policy requiring nail cleaning during scheduled showers, observations and staff interviews revealed this task was not consistently performed, resulting in a deficiency in personal hygiene care.
A resident struck another with a closed fist, and the incident was not reported to the state agency within the required 2-hour timeframe. The delay was due to the administrator's personal circumstances, including inclement weather and power outages. Both residents involved had complex medical histories and were cognitively intact.
A resident with dementia and a history of falls sustained multiple fractures due to improper transfer techniques and inadequate supervision. Staff failed to follow the facility's protocol requiring the use of a gait belt for transfers, leading to severe injuries that were only identified after significant delays and multiple complaints of pain.
A facility failed to notify a physician when a resident's oxygen saturation dropped to 77%. The nurse applied PRN oxygen but did not contact the physician or DON immediately. The resident's condition improved overnight, but the physician was not informed, and the resident was not sent to the hospital until later when additional symptoms were observed.
Misappropriation of Resident’s Cell Phone and Phone Account by Staff Member
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of property when a housekeeping staff member took the resident's Android cell phone and used it without consent. The resident was an elderly female with dementia, type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension, who was documented as cognitively intact on admission with a BIMS score of 13/15 and able to make herself understood and understand others. Her care plan noted impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes. The resident later reported that a young man with curly hair had taken her phone, and her family, who lived out of state and managed the phone account, began receiving unusual emails related to the phone and account. The Administrator stated that the resident's phone was first reported missing on 02/26/26, and initial efforts focused on searching the facility, including laundry and retracing the resident's steps, under the assumption that the phone was misplaced or mixed with linens. On 03/01/26, after the family forwarded emails from the phone service provider, the Administrator realized the phone had been stolen rather than simply missing. The emails showed that an iPhone 15 had been ordered on the resident's account to be delivered to an address that did not belong to the resident's family or the facility. Further review of the emails from the phone service provider showed that on 02/27/26, the resident's account was accessed to add a cloud service, place an iPhone 17 Pro Max in the cart, complete an order for an iPhone 15 billed to the resident's family member, and change the account password, account manager, and mailing/billing address. Subsequent emails documented additional account changes, including de-enrollment of the email receiver and cancellation of the phone order the following day. The Administrator cross-referenced the delivery address for the iPhone 15 and confirmed it matched the address of the housekeeping staff member, who had worked the day the phone went missing. A police affidavit documented that the Deputy was informed that this worker had stolen the resident's phone, changed all passwords, and purchased a new iPhone 15 on the resident's phone plan without consent.
Failure to Initiate Baseline Care Plan Within 48 Hours of Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for one resident who was admitted with multiple complex diagnoses, including cerebral infarction, interstitial pulmonary disease, and dementia. The resident was prescribed oxygen therapy as needed and had additional medical conditions such as diabetes and a history of stroke. Although the comprehensive care plan was initiated several days after admission, there was no evidence that a baseline care plan was completed or provided to guide staff in meeting the resident's immediate needs during the initial period following admission. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the admitting nurse did not initiate the baseline care plan, and there was confusion among staff regarding responsibility for this task. The LVN responsible for the admission was unaware of the requirement to initiate the baseline care plan, believing it was the responsibility of an RN. The ADON and DON acknowledged that the baseline care plan was overlooked and confirmed that their expectation was for all new admissions to have a baseline care plan completed within 48 hours. Facility policy also indicated the importance of timely completion and implementation of baseline care plans to ensure continuity of care and communication among staff.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Dialysis and Hospice Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents. For one resident with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and a history of hemodialysis, the facility did not accurately code dialysis care on multiple MDS assessments, including quarterly, annual, and Medicare 5-day assessments. Despite documentation in the resident's face sheet, physician orders, care plan, progress notes, and dialysis communication forms confirming ongoing dialysis treatments during the assessment periods, Section O j1 (Dialysis care) was not marked as being received. The MDS Coordinator stated that dialysis was not coded due to a lack of documentation from the dialysis center at the time of assessment, although such documentation was later obtained. For another resident with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, stroke, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer's disease, the facility failed to accurately code hospice care on a quarterly MDS assessment. Physician orders and the care plan indicated the resident was receiving hospice services for a terminal diagnosis, but Section O k1 (Hospice care) was not marked as being received. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged this was a data entry error upon review. These inaccuracies were identified through observation, interview, and record review.
Failure to Update Physician Orders for Dialysis in Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete and accurately documented for a resident with end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The resident was originally ordered to receive dialysis two times per week, but a progress note indicated that the dialysis center increased the frequency to three times per week. Despite this change, the physician's orders in the electronic health record were not updated to reflect the new dialysis schedule. Interviews with the resident, a nurse, and the MDS Coordinator confirmed that the resident was receiving dialysis three times weekly, and the MDS Coordinator had obtained records from the dialysis center verifying this schedule. However, the physician's orders remained outdated in the facility's records. Further interviews revealed that both the MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nursing were unaware of why the electronic health records had not been updated to match the new dialysis regimen. The Director of Nursing stated that it was the responsibility of the nursing staff to update physician orders when there is a change in care or treatment. The facility's policy required review and confirmation of physician orders for dialysis, but this procedure was not followed, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate documentation in the resident's medical record.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Staff Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically by not implementing enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for a resident identified as requiring such measures. During an observation, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) entered the resident's room, which had EBP signage indicating the need for personal protective equipment (PPE), but did not sanitize her hands or don a gown and gloves before providing activities of daily living (ADL) care. The CNA admitted in an interview that she was unaware of what EBP entailed, had not received training on EBP, and could not articulate the potential negative outcomes of failing to follow EBP protocols. Further interviews revealed that the infection prevention (IP) nurse confirmed there was no documentation of staff training on EBP, and the business office manager, responsible for new hires, stated that no new employees were trained or checked off on EBP. A review of the new hire orientation checklist showed it did not address EBP, despite the facility having an EBP policy outlining when PPE should be used during high-contact resident care activities. These findings demonstrate a lack of staff awareness and training regarding EBP, resulting in non-compliance with infection control protocols.
Failure to Provide Mandatory EBP Training for Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to include mandatory training on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as part of its infection prevention and control program for staff. During an observation, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) entered a resident's room with EBP signage and available personal protective equipment (PPE) but did not sanitize her hands or don a gown and gloves before providing activities of daily living (ADL) care. In an interview, the CNA admitted she did not know what EBP was, was unaware of the requirements, and had not received training on EBP at the facility. She was also unable to identify potential negative outcomes from not following EBP for at-risk residents. Further interviews revealed that the infection prevention (IP) nurse confirmed there was no documentation of staff training for EBP, and the business office manager, responsible for new hires, stated that no new employees had been trained or checked off on EBP. A review of the New Hire Orientation Checklist showed it did not address EBP, despite the facility's own EBP policy outlining the need for staff awareness and training on donning gowns and gloves during high-contact activities.
Failure to Maintain Hazard-Free Environment and Provide Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified in the facility's failure to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. The report notes that the environment did not meet safety standards, which could contribute to the risk of accidents occurring. Specific actions or inactions by staff or details about the residents involved are not provided in the report. The deficiency centers on the lack of appropriate measures to maintain a hazard-free environment and to supervise residents adequately to prevent accidents.
Failure to Timely Report Suspected Abuse, Neglect, or Theft
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and did not report the results of the investigation to the proper authorities. This deficiency is based on the observation that when an incident of suspected abuse, neglect, or theft occurred, the required notifications and reporting procedures were not followed as mandated. The report specifically notes the lack of timely communication and documentation to the appropriate authorities regarding both the suspicion and the outcome of the internal investigation.
Failure to Ensure Controlled Drug Audit Records Were Consistently Signed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services by not ensuring that the Controlled Drugs Audit Record for the 100/300/unit nurses' medication cart was consistently signed before and after each shift over a period of several months. Record reviews revealed a total of 28 missing nurse signatures across the months of October 2024 through April 2025. Specific dates and shifts were identified where either the on-coming or off-going nurse did not sign the audit record, as required by facility policy. Interviews with nursing staff and leadership confirmed that the expected process was for two licensed nurses, or a nurse and a CMA as allowed by state regulations, to count and sign for controlled medications at each shift change. LVN A acknowledged that the missing signatures could be due to forgetting or being interrupted during the count. The DON and Administrator both stated that their expectation was for all required signatures to be present to verify that the medication count was completed and to prevent potential drug diversion or missing medications. The facility's Controlled Medications - Administration policy required a physical inventory of all controlled medications at each shift change, with documentation on an audit record. Despite this policy, the audit records for the medication cart showed repeated lapses in obtaining the necessary signatures, indicating that the process was not consistently followed or monitored.
Failure to Prevent Drug Diversion of Controlled Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from the misappropriation of property when approximately 1 mL of the resident's liquid morphine sulfate, a controlled medication, was found missing during a narcotic count audit. The incident was discovered during a shift change, and the discrepancy was noted by two LVNs who reported the missing medication to the DON and Administrator. Multiple staff members who had access to the medication cart were interviewed and required to provide statements and drug screens. Several nurses either refused the drug screen or could not be located for testing, and one nurse suspected of diversion left the facility and did not return for testing. The resident involved was an elderly male with Alzheimer's disease, prostate cancer, and a history of fractures, who was receiving hospice care and scheduled as well as PRN pain medications, including liquid morphine sulfate. The resident had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to advocate for himself. Documentation showed that the resident received morphine as ordered, and there were no reports of pain exacerbation or adverse effects during the period in question. The medication administration records and witness statements from staff were reviewed, and no other discrepancies were found in the narcotic counts for this or other residents. Staff interviews revealed that some nurses had observed suspicious behavior from the nurse suspected of diversion, including sleeping on the job and slurred speech, and that management was aware of these behaviors prior to the incident. The facility's investigation included reviewing medication administration records, interviewing staff, and conducting drug screens. The incident was reported to the appropriate authorities, and the facility followed its drug diversion protocol as outlined in its policies.
Failure to Develop and Implement Person-Centered Care Plans for Behavioral Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two residents with documented behavioral issues. For one resident with Alzheimer's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and colon cancer, the care plan addressed only physical aggression and did not include interventions for frequent verbal and other disruptive behaviors, such as agitation, preaching loudly, and making disruptive sounds. Documentation showed these behaviors occurred regularly, but the care plan lacked specific, individualized interventions or measurable goals for these issues. Additionally, care plan conference forms and weekly nursing summaries often omitted detailed descriptions of the behaviors, and there was no evidence that these behaviors were discussed or addressed in care planning meetings. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment and anxiety disorder also exhibited verbal and physical behaviors, including agitation, pacing, and confrontational statements toward others. Despite these documented behaviors in nursing progress notes and CNA task documentation, the resident's care plan did not address behavioral issues at all. Care plan conference forms similarly failed to document or discuss these behaviors, and there was no evidence of individualized interventions or goals to manage or mitigate the resident's actions. Observations and staff interviews confirmed that both residents regularly displayed behaviors that affected their interactions with others, sometimes leading to altercations. Staff acknowledged that these behaviors were typical for the residents and that care plans should have included specific interventions to guide staff responses. Facility policy required comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timeframes for all identified needs, but this was not followed for the two residents in question.
Failure to Maintain Effective Pest Control Program Resulting in Resident Ant Bites
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in a resident on the secured unit sustaining multiple ant bites. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living, was found to have 10 ant bites on the left arm, 2 on the right arm, and 2 on the left clavicle. These bites were identified during a head-to-toe skin assessment, and the resident was unaware of the bites and reported no pain or discomfort. Observations and interviews confirmed that ants and food crumbs were present in the resident's room over several days, despite repeated cleaning efforts. Documentation showed that staff observed black ants around the baseboards and food crumbs in the affected rooms on multiple occasions. Housekeeping performed deep cleaning several times, but ants continued to be found until pest control was contacted and bait was applied. The pest control company confirmed live ant activity in the resident's room and another room on the secured unit, and performed bait applications to address the issue. Despite these interventions, ant mounds were later observed on the facility grounds, some of which did not show evidence of having been treated as required by facility protocol. Interviews with staff, including CNAs, LVNs, the Maintenance Supervisor, the DON, and the Administrator, revealed that the presence of open food and sugar packets in the resident's room contributed to the ant problem. Staff reported that pest activity was to be logged and reported, and that the Maintenance Supervisor was responsible for coordinating pest control services. However, the ongoing presence of ants and untreated ant mounds indicated lapses in the pest control program and monitoring, which led to the resident being bitten by ants.
Failure to Maintain Required RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the required registered nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, during the second quarter of the fiscal year 2024. Specifically, there was no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on January 25, 26, 27, and 28, 2024. This lapse occurred because the previous Director of Nursing (DON) left on January 24, 2024, and the new DON did not start until January 29, 2024. During this period, the facility did not have a policy on staffing to ensure continuous RN coverage. The Human Resources Manager confirmed the lack of RN coverage by reviewing time sheet documentation, which showed that RN D and Corporate Compliance RNs E and F worked shifts that did not meet the 8 consecutive hours requirement. The Area Director of Operations and the facility administrator also acknowledged the absence of adequate RN coverage during the specified dates. This deficiency could potentially place residents at risk due to the lack of nursing oversight and a higher level of care.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary nail care for a resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) independently. The resident, a male with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions including a stroke, dysphagia, and diabetes, was entirely dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Despite the care plan specifying that his nails should be cleaned on bath days and as needed, observations over several days revealed a dark brown substance under his fingernails, indicating a lack of proper nail care. Interviews with staff, including a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that the resident's nails were supposed to be cleaned during showers, which were scheduled three times a week. However, the observations showed that this task was not consistently performed, as evidenced by the persistent presence of the substance under the resident's nails. The facility's policy on nail care, which emphasizes cleanliness and prevention of infection, was not adhered to, leading to this deficiency in care.
Delayed Reporting of Resident Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within the required 2-hour timeframe to the State Agency. This incident involved a 69-year-old female resident who struck another resident with a closed fist on the left upper arm. The incident was witnessed by an LVN who intervened and separated the residents. Despite being aware of the incident immediately after it occurred, the facility's administrator did not report it to the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) until four days later. The delay in reporting was attributed to the administrator's personal circumstances, including inclement weather and power outages at both her residence and the facility. The administrator acknowledged her failure to report the incident within the mandated timeframe and took full responsibility for the oversight. The facility's policy requires that all allegations of abuse be reported to the administrator, who is then responsible for notifying the state agency within 2 hours if the allegations involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. The residents involved in the incident had complex medical histories. The resident who struck the other had a history of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, and was known to make false accusations. The resident who was struck had diagnoses including alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, type 2 diabetes, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Both residents were cognitively intact according to their MDS assessments, with BIMS scores indicating they could understand and be understood by others.
Failure to Prevent Injuries of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 did not sustain injuries of unknown origin. Resident #1, who had a history of dementia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle wasting, and a history of falling, was diagnosed with multiple fractures, including a comminuted intertrochanteric left femur fracture, a comminuted intertrochanteric right femur fracture, and an acute angulated displaced fracture of the left proximal humeral diaphysis. These injuries were discovered after Resident #1 complained of pain and exhibited signs of distress during routine care and transfers, which were not conducted according to the facility's protocol requiring the use of a gait belt for transfers. The staff failed to follow the Kardex instructions for Resident #1's care, which specified the need for one staff member to assist with transfers using a gait belt. CNA A admitted to transferring Resident #1 without a gait belt, which was against the facility's protocol. Multiple staff members, including LVNs and CNAs, reported that Resident #1 complained of pain and exhibited unusual physical conditions, but no immediate action was taken to investigate the cause of the pain or the potential for injury. The facility's failure to adhere to established protocols and adequately supervise and assist Resident #1 led to the resident sustaining severe injuries of unknown origin, which were only identified after significant delays and multiple complaints of pain from the resident.
Failure to Notify Physician of Significant Change in Resident's Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status. Specifically, the facility did not notify the physician when a resident's oxygen saturation level dropped to 77% on room air. The resident had a history of dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and other significant health issues, and was on a PRN order for oxygen. Despite the low oxygen levels, the nurse only applied PRN oxygen and did not contact the physician or the Director of Nursing (DON) immediately. The DON was informed via text message but did not see it until several hours later, by which time the resident's oxygen levels had improved. However, the physician was still not notified, and the resident was not sent to the hospital for evaluation until later when additional symptoms, including pain and swelling, were observed. The resident's condition was initially reported by a CNA who noticed that the resident did not look right. The nurse on duty recorded the resident's vital signs, which included an oxygen saturation of 77%, and applied PRN oxygen. The nurse discussed the situation with another nurse but did not escalate it to the physician or the DON immediately. The resident's oxygen levels gradually improved overnight, but the physician was not informed of the initial low oxygen levels. The DON later stated that if she had been called, she would have directed the nurse to either obtain orders from the physician or send the resident to the hospital. Interviews with the nursing staff revealed that they had received training on physician notification both before and after the incident. The facility's policy required immediate notification of the physician in case of significant changes in a resident's status. Despite this, the nurse did not follow the protocol, leading to a delay in appropriate medical intervention. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began, but the initial failure to notify the physician could have placed the resident at risk for delayed treatment and decreased quality of life.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 2 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Woodville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodville Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Pine Ridge Health Care Llp | 22 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Timberidge Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 25.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Rayburn Health Care & Rehabilitation | 25.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Paradigm At Kountze | 28.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Dogwood Trails Manor.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.