Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Cypress Pointe Health & Wellness during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Provide Ordered Pain Relief and Pain Reassessment: A cognitively intact resident with an order for PRN Tramadol reported pain during care and said she had not received her ordered pain medication. An RN gave Acetaminophen instead of Tramadol and did not complete a follow-up pain assessment after administration, later documenting pain as 0 without asking the resident. The DON stated staff were expected to assess pain each shift and reassess after pain medication was given.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Diagnosis and Behavior Coding. The facility coded one resident’s MDS with schizophrenia as an active dx and no antipsychotic use even though current provider records and the NP did not support that dx or medication status. The facility also coded another resident’s admission MDS Section E as having no behaviors or rejection of care, despite progress notes showing repeated medication and ADL refusals, refusal of blood draws, agitation, and an attempt to hit staff; the resident’s care plan also identified behavior problems and medication refusal related to dementia.
A facility failed to provide ordered respiratory care for multiple residents. One resident with a trach was found with the O2 mask not positioned over the trach and staff did not assess respiratory status or check sats before and after trach suctioning; another resident with dementia was found with her NC off on two occasions and staff reinserted it without assessment or checking O2 sats; a third resident ordered 5 L NC was observed receiving only 2 L.
Expired medical supplies were found in a medication cart and the medication room, including eSwab tubes, urine analysis transfer straw kits, flu test kits, gastric feeding tubes, and IV administration sets. An LVN stated he checked the cart daily but missed the expired tubes, and the ADON stated she checked the medication room monthly but did not notice the expired items. The DON said nurses, MAs, and the ADON were expected to check for expired supplies, and the facility policy called for regular audits and removal of expired items.
Undated Refrigerated Food Item in Kitchen: An open container of mayonnaise was observed in the refrigerator without a date label during a kitchen review. The Kitchen Manager stated the item had been overlooked and acknowledged that kitchen staff and management were responsible for ensuring refrigerated foods were labeled. Facility policy required refrigerated foods to be dated and labeled.
A resident with a PICC for IV antibiotics and a diagnosis of cellulitis had an order for weekly sterile dressing and cap changes, but staff documented the dressing change as completed even though it was not actually done. Observation showed the PICC dressing was still dated from an earlier date, and staff interviews confirmed the dressing should have been changed weekly and that the documentation was inaccurate.
Medication administration errors exceeded the allowed rate when two staff members failed to give one scheduled medication each during observed med passes. An RN omitted allopurinol for one resident, and a MA omitted sulfasalazine for another resident, despite both medications being available in the med cart. The DON stated staff were expected to administer all scheduled meds and double check MARs and medication containers.
A resident with a hx of stroke-related weakness, Parkinsonism, and impaired cognition was ordered a mechanical soft diet with regular liquids and NAS. During meal observations, he was served dry lightly toasted toast at breakfast and a dinner roll plus boiled/baked potatoes with skin at lunch, despite the diet order. The Dietary Manager stated mechanical soft meals were typically chopped or mashed for ease of chewing, and the resident said bread and potato skins were hard for him to chew.
Infection control practices were not maintained when staff provided trach care and suctioning for a resident with tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, gastrostomy, and DM2. The ADON used a non-sterile towel from the resident’s chest to clean the trach collar, and an RN broke sterile technique during suctioning and trach care by handling sterile and dirty items with the same gloves and touching equipment with contaminated gloves. In a separate event, a used single-use lancet was left on another resident’s nightstand instead of being discarded in a sharps container.
Failure to Post Complete Daily Staffing Information: The facility did not ensure the daily nursing staffing posting was visible and complete. The posting by the DON's office listed staff counts and hours for RN, LVN, CNA, and MA/CMA, but it did not include the resident census or the shifts worked by direct care staff. The Administrator stated the posting was prepared each morning by the receptionist, should include the facility name, date, census, and hours worked per shift, and was not in a common area visible to all visitors.
A resident with muscle wasting, impaired gait, low BIMS score, incontinence, and a care plan identifying fall risk and the need for prompt assistance was observed lying in bed with the call light wedged between the bed rail and mattress, out of reach. The resident reported wanting to call staff for water but being unable to reach the call light. Staff interviews (CNA, LVN, DON) confirmed that call lights are expected to be within residents’ reach, checked after care and before leaving rooms, and secured with clips per facility policy, which requires staff to place call lights within reach when leaving the room.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and hemiplegia developed a pressure ulcer between the index finger and thumb due to inadequate skin assessments and monitoring by the facility staff. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, but the staff failed to identify or treat the ulcer, which was discovered upon hospital admission. The facility's policies for skin and wound management were not effectively implemented, leading to this deficiency.
A facility failed to ensure a resident received respiratory care consistent with professional standards and the care plan. The resident, with multiple complex medical conditions, was observed receiving oxygen at 5 liters per nasal cannula instead of the prescribed 2 liters. Nursing staff admitted to not checking the oxygen flow rate during their shift, and no documentation of a change in the resident's oxygen needs was found.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions was not administered Midodrine as ordered by the physician on several occasions due to incorrect interpretation of blood pressure parameters by the administering nurse. The facility's policy on administering medications was not followed.
Failure to Provide Ordered Pain Management and Follow-Up Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe, appropriate pain management for Resident #121, a cognitively intact female with a BIMS score of 15 and oxygen therapy needs. Her baseline care plan identified a risk for pain and directed staff to monitor and document pain medication side effects and signs of non-verbal pain. Her medication orders included Tramadol 50 mg every 6 hours as needed for moderate pain and Acetaminophen as needed for mild pain, and her pain was to be assessed every shift using a 0-10 scale. Resident #121 reported pain after incontinence care and repositioning, stating that her pain ranged from 5 to 6 out of 10 and increased with movement. She also told staff that she had not received any pain medication since admission and that she was supposed to receive Tramadol. The surveyor observed her in bed on oxygen, and she described pain related to being rolled onto her hip. RN B stated she was first notified of the pain by the surveyor and said the resident reported pain at 3 to 4 out of 10 and mentioned normally receiving Tramadol. RN B did not administer Tramadol and instead gave 2 tablets of Acetaminophen 500 mg. After giving Acetaminophen, RN B did not complete a follow-up pain assessment and later documented a pain score of 0 without asking the resident about her pain. Resident #121 stated that the nurse did not follow up to see if the medication was effective and that she continued to have pain. RN B acknowledged that nurses were expected to assess pain during rounds, ask specific questions about pain, and complete a follow-up assessment after pain medication administration, and she said she should have asked the resident whether her pain was controlled after Acetaminophen was given. The DON stated that staff were expected to assess pain each shift and complete a follow-up assessment 30 minutes to 1 hour after pain medication administration.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Diagnosis and Behavior Coding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected resident status for two residents. For one resident, Section I of multiple MDS assessments listed schizophrenia as an active diagnosis and indicated that antipsychotic medications were not received, even though the hospital discharge summary and provider orders did not show schizophrenia or any active antipsychotic medication order. The NP stated the resident was not schizophrenic and did not need antipsychotic medications, while the MDS LVN stated she relied on the diagnoses list rather than reviewing current provider notes. The DON and Regional MDS RN both stated the MDS should have been completed using current provider documentation. For the second resident, the admission MDS completed by MDS Nurse B showed no psychosis, no behavioral symptoms directed toward others, no other behavioral symptoms, and no rejection of care in Section E. However, the resident’s progress notes documented repeated refusals of medication, refusal of ADLs, refusal of blood draws, agitation, and an attempt to hit staff during care. Notes also documented that staff and the resident’s RP were aware of the refusals and that the resident had a history of refusing medication and food. The care plan also identified a behavior problem and refusal of medications related to dementia. During interview, MDS Nurse B stated the MDS was expected to reflect the resident in real time and in the look-back period, and after reviewing the progress notes she agreed the Section E coding was inaccurate because it did not document the resident’s behaviors and rejection of care. The facility policy stated that MDS coding is based on clinical assessments, interviews, interventions, objective observations, medications, treatments, changes in condition, and behavioral concerns, and that the assessment must accurately reflect the resident’s status.
Respiratory Care and Oxygen Orders Not Followed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for residents who required oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care. Resident #7 had diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, Parkinson’s disease, and COPD, and his care plan called for continuous oxygen, suctioning, and tracheostomy care. On 03/04/26, he was observed lying in bed with his oxygen mask not over his tracheostomy tube while the oxygen concentrator was delivering 4 L/min. ADON C entered the room, cleaned the trach collar, and placed the oxygen mask over the trach collar, but did not assess his respiratory status or check oxygen saturation. Shortly afterward, RN B entered to suction the trach, but she did not check oxygen saturation before or after suctioning. The record also showed an order for 6 L via trach to maintain sats above 92%, later changed to 4 L via trach, and the report states the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 received oxygen as ordered when he was administered 4 L instead of 6 L as ordered. Resident #111 had diagnoses including pacemaker, stomach bleed, falls, long-term blood thinner use, and high cholesterol, and her care plan noted oxygen therapy because she sometimes removed her oxygen due to dementia. She was ordered 2 L via nasal cannula continuously. On 03/04/26, she was observed in bed with her nasal cannula out of her nose, appearing sedated, drifting in and out, and not interviewable. RN B placed the cannula back in her nose but did not assess her, check oxygen saturation, or verify oxygen settings. On 03/05/26, she was again observed with her nasal cannula out while eating breakfast, and ADON C placed it back in her nose without performing an assessment or checking oxygen saturation. The report states RN B and ADON C failed to assess Resident #111 when she was found without her oxygen in place. Resident #121 had oxygen therapy ordered for chronic respiratory failure and was ordered 5 L via nasal cannula to maintain sats above 92%. The record showed an oxygen saturation of 95% on 2 L, and on observation she was in bed with a nasal cannula delivering 2 L/min, not 5 L/min. She was alert, oriented, and not in respiratory distress, and she stated she never received oxygen at 5 L/min and that her saturations were always between 97% and 100%. The report states the facility failed to ensure Resident #121 received oxygen as ordered when she was administered 2 L instead of 5 L as ordered.
Expired Medical Supplies Found in Medication Cart and Medication Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident by not ensuring the medication room and medication cart were free of expired medical supplies. During observation of the 300 hall medication cart, staff were found storing 2 expired eSwab tubes. LVN J stated he checked the medication cart every day for expired items and said he should have noticed and discarded the expired tubes. He also stated that leaving expired unopened wound culture tubes in medication carts could cause inaccurate lab results and improper treatment plans based on those wrong results. During observation of the medication room, staff were found storing multiple expired medical supplies, including 7 unopened eSwab tubes, 2 unopened eSwap tubes, 20 unopened urine analysis transfer straw kits, 90 unopened flu test kits, 3 unopened gastric feeding tubes, and 40 unopened intravenous administration sets. ADON B stated she checked the medication room every month for expired items but did not notice the expired supplies, and said the items had not been used recently. The DON stated she expected ADON B to check the medication room monthly and nurses and MAs to check medication carts daily for expired items. The facility's Medical Supplies Inventory Policy stated supplies should be rotated, audited at least monthly, and expired items should be discarded when found.
Undated Refrigerated Food Item in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement. During an observation of the kitchen on 3/4/2026 at 8:18 a.m., an open 1-gallon container of Homestyle Mayonnaise in the refrigerator was found not dated. In an interview on 3/6/2026 at 10:18 a.m., the Kitchen Manager stated that everything in the refrigerator was labeled except the mayonnaise, that it may have been overlooked, and that it was the responsibility of kitchen staff and management to ensure all food in the refrigerator was labeled. She also stated that the mayonnaise should have been discarded because it was not known how long it had been in the refrigerator. Record review of the facility's Food Storage policy, revised on 6/1/2019, stated that refrigerated foods must be dated, labeled, and tightly sealed in clean, nonabsorbent, covered containers approved for food storage.
PICC Dressing Change Not Performed as Documented
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident’s goals and preferences for one of three residents reviewed for parenteral fluids. Resident #70 was admitted with diagnoses including left upper limb cellulitis, type 2 diabetes, anxiety, and obesity, and had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15. Her care plan identified risk for complications associated with antibiotic IV therapy and directed staff to change the dressing to the IV access site as ordered. A physician order dated 03/01/26 directed that the PICC line dressing and cap be changed weekly using sterile technique, every Sunday in the morning. The March 2026 MAR showed LVN J documented the PICC dressing change as completed on 03/01/26. However, the record contained no documentation showing the dressing change was actually performed or that the resident refused the care. On 03/04/26, observation showed the resident had a dressing on her right upper arm covering the PICC line, and the dressing was dated 02/22/26. The resident stated she did not know when the IV dressing was last changed and said the line had stopped working so it was scheduled to be changed. During interviews, RN B stated nurses were expected to check PICC lines daily and change dressings every week to prevent infection, and she said she did not know why the dressing was not changed. LVN J said IV dressings must be changed every week, signed, dated, and documented in real time, and he acknowledged he documented the dressing change on 03/01/26 even though the dressing was not changed. The DON stated IV dressings should be changed every week and dated when changed, and that inaccurate documentation could remove the task from the MAR. The facility policy stated PICC and midline catheter dressings should be changed every 7 days or sooner if wet, soiled, loose, or open to air.
Medication Administration Errors Exceeded Allowed Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the medication error rate remained below 5 percent. Surveyors observed two medication administration errors out of 29 opportunities, resulting in a 6.0% error rate. The errors involved two residents and two staff members during medication pass observations, and both errors were related to scheduled medications that were not administered during the observed medication rounds. For one resident, the physician orders included multiple scheduled medications for conditions including high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, vitamin D deficiency, constipation, BPH, spasm, CAD, heart health, nausea and vomiting, severe pain, depression, vitamin C deficiency, and gout. During observation, an RN prepared and administered multiple ordered medications but did not administer allopurinol 300 mg, even though it was available in the medication cart. The RN later stated she had given all scheduled medications, including allopurinol. For another resident, the physician orders included medications for spasm, vitamin supplementation, seizure disorder, diabetes, high blood pressure, liver disease, peripheral artery disease, low sodium levels, and rheumatoid arthritis. During observation, a MA administered several ordered medications but did not administer sulfasalazine 500 mg, although it was available in the medication cart. The MA later stated she had given all scheduled medications, including sulfasalazine. The DON stated staff were expected to administer all scheduled medications and double check MARs and medication containers, and the NP stated staff were expected to notify her when medications were missed.
Mechanical Soft Diet Not Followed for Resident With Chewing Difficulty
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #65 received food prepared in a form designed to meet his individual needs. Resident #65 was a male with diagnoses including right-sided paralysis and weakness following a stroke, Parkinsonism, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and a speech disorder affecting articulation. His admission MDS showed moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 11 out of 15, and his care plan identified a nutritional concern with a Mechanical Soft texture and Regular Liquids consistency, with instructions to serve the diet as ordered. On 03/05/26, the resident’s order summary listed a No Added Salt diet with Mechanical Soft texture and Regular Liquids, with orange juice and fruit punch to be given with meals. During breakfast observation, he was served scrambled eggs, chopped sausage in gravy, and two slices of toast that were full, uncut, dry, and lightly toasted. During lunch observation, he was served a dinner roll, chopped meat, steamed vegetables, and a boiled/baked potato with skin covering most of the surface and not mashed. The Dietary Manager stated that residents on mechanical soft diets typically received chopped meats and mashed potatoes without skins, and that the kitchen system still allowed lightly toasted bread. Resident #65 stated that bread, toast, and potato skins were hard for him to chew and that he preferred the mechanical soft diet because regular food was tough to chew.
Infection Control Failures During Trach Care and Blood Sampling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control practices. The deficiencies involved Resident #7, who had diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and who was dependent for all ADLs, on continuous oxygen, and receiving PRN suctioning and trach care. The resident’s care plan and physician orders included trach care, suctioning as needed, and routine tracheostomy-related care. During observation on 03/04/26, the ADON cleaned Resident #7’s trach collar with a non-sterile towel that had been sitting on the resident’s chest and then placed the oxygen mask over the trach collar. Later that same day, RN B suctioned the resident’s trach while wearing sterile gloves but opened drawers and gathered nonsterile supplies with those gloves, unsheathed and re-sheathed the suction canula, and touched the canula with contaminated gloves. The resident showed no signs of respiratory distress during the process. On 03/05/26, RN B again provided trach care and suctioning for Resident #7. She used sterile gloves and opened a sterile trach care kit, but during the procedure she handled the suction catheter and other items in a way that broke sterile technique, including touching equipment with dirty gloves and using the same gloves to handle dirty items and then sterile items. The facility’s policies for suctioning the lower airway and tracheostomy care required sterile technique, and the DON stated that breaking sterility during suctioning could introduce germs into the trach and cause infection. The facility also failed to ensure a used single-use push button lancet was not left on Resident 57’s nightstand on 03/04/2026. The report states that the lancet, a device with a hidden needle used for finger sticks, was observed on the resident’s nightstand, and the facility policy required used lancets to be discarded into a sharps container after use.
Failure to Post Complete Daily Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the daily nursing staffing information was posted and readily accessible for review. Observations on 03/04/26, 03/05/26, and 03/06/26 showed the Daily Staffing Hours posting on the left side of the hall by the DON's office between the 100 and 200 halls. The posting included the date, number of staff, number of hours, and total number of hours worked per position for RN, LVN, CNA, and MA/CMA, but it did not include the resident census or the shifts worked by direct care staff. The Administrator stated on 03/04/26 that the receptionist completed the Daily Staffing Hours posting each morning using the provided template. In a later interview, the Administrator said the expected staffing posting should include the facility name, date, census, and the total number of hours scheduled and worked for each staff type per shift, and that it should be posted in a common area. She also stated the posting location by the DON's office would not be seen by visitors going only to the 100, 300, and 400 halls. On 03/06/26, the Administrator said the facility did not have a policy addressing the required staffing posting and used the Texas Administrative Code as the regulation.
Failure to Keep Call Light Within Reach for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident’s call light was within reach as required by the resident’s care plan and the facility’s call light policy. The resident was an older male with diagnoses including muscle wasting, abnormality of gait and mobility, difficulty in walking, and lack of coordination. His most recent Quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 4, use of a wheelchair for mobility, need for partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene and upper body dressing, and always being incontinent of bowel and bladder. His care plan for fall risk, dated 02/05/2025, identified problems related to diabetes, neuropathy, and recurrent falls, with an intervention specifying that his call light must be within reach and that he required a prompt response to all requests for assistance. On 02/06/2026 at 12:40 p.m., surveyors observed the resident lying in bed with his call light located between the bed rail and mattress, out of his reach. During this observation, the resident stated he wanted to call staff to request water but could not reach his call light, and that he usually could reach it but not at that time. In interviews, CNA A stated call lights should be within residents’ reach, that this resident needed the call light to request assistance, and that she checked call lights after providing care. The DON stated she expected all staff to check residents’ call lights when entering and before leaving rooms, to place call lights within reach, and to use clips to keep them attached to beds. LVN A similarly stated call lights should be within reach and that nurses and CNAs should have noticed and clipped the resident’s call light to his bed. The facility’s August 2021 Call Lights Policy required staff to place the call light within reach of the resident when leaving the room.
Failure to Prevent and Treat Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent the worsening of pressure sores for a resident. The resident, an elderly male with a history of severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, and dementia, was at risk for pressure ulcers due to his immobility and contractures. Despite being at risk, the facility did not identify or treat a pressure ulcer that developed between the resident's index finger and thumb, which was discovered upon his admission to the hospital. The resident was supposed to have weekly skin assessments and wear protective geri-sleeves to prevent skin tears from scratching. However, the staff failed to properly assess the resident's skin condition, particularly the area between the index finger and thumb, which was difficult to inspect due to the resident's contracted hand. The geri-sleeves were not consistently checked or changed, and the staff did not adequately monitor for new skin issues or injuries, leading to the development of a pressure ulcer. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of training and understanding regarding the proper use and monitoring of geri-sleeves. The staff, including CNAs and nurses, did not perform thorough skin assessments or report new skin issues, and there was a lack of communication and coordination among the care team. The facility's policies and procedures for skin and wound management were not effectively implemented, contributing to the oversight and subsequent deficiency.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's care plan. Specifically, the facility did not set the oxygen flow rate at 2 liters per the physician's order for a resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including hypertensive heart disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic systolic heart failure, and dyspnea. Observations revealed that the resident was receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 5 liters per nasal cannula, contrary to the prescribed 2 liters as needed for shortness of breath. This discrepancy was noted during multiple observations on the same day, indicating a failure to adhere to the prescribed oxygen flow rate. Interviews with the nursing staff and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the nurses were responsible for ensuring the correct oxygen flow rate according to the physician's orders and for monitoring it every shift. However, the responsible nurse admitted that she had not checked the resident's oxygen flow rate during her shift and acknowledged the risk of CO2 retention due to the higher oxygen flow rate. The DON reiterated that any changes in the resident's oxygen needs should be documented in the chart, but no such documentation was found. This failure to follow the prescribed oxygen flow rate could place residents at risk of incorrect or inadequate respiratory support, potentially leading to a decline in health.
Failure to Administer Medication as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured the accurate administration of Midodrine, a medication for low blood pressure, to a resident. The resident, a [AGE] year-old female with multiple complex medical conditions including rheumatoid lung disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and hypertension, was not administered Midodrine as ordered by the physician on several occasions. Specifically, the medication was held on three instances despite the resident's blood pressure being within the parameters set by the physician's order, which required the medication to be held only if the systolic blood pressure was greater than 130. The resident's care plan indicated that she had a diagnosis of altered cardiovascular status related to hypotension and required medications to be administered per physician's orders. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that the medication was not given on specific dates due to incorrect interpretation of blood pressure parameters by the administering nurse. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) both acknowledged that the medication should have been administered as the resident's blood pressure was not outside the specified parameters. Interviews with the DON, ADON, and the pharmacist confirmed that the medication should have been given according to the physician's order. The nurse responsible for the error admitted to possibly confusing the less than and greater than signs, leading to the incorrect decision to withhold the medication. The facility's policy on administering medications, which mandates that medications be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, was not followed in this instance.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 573 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 48 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Houston
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Crest Rapid Recovery | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 26 | 3 |
| Copperfield Healthcare And Rehabilitation | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 3 |
| Fallbrook Rehabilitation And Care Center | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 4 |
| Park Manor Of Cyfair | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Cypress Creek Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Cypress Pointe Health & Wellness.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.