Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Clyde Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Call lights were not kept within reach for three residents with cognitive impairment and care plans that directed staff to keep the call light in reach in the room and bathroom. One resident’s call light was stuck between the side rail and mattress, another resident’s soft touch call light was hanging behind the bed out of reach, and a third resident’s call light was also stuck between the side rail and mattress. The DON and Administrator stated call lights should always be within reach and within sight, and the facility policy required staff to ensure the call light was within reach and secured as needed.
Bathroom Hot Water Temperatures Below Expected Range: Surveyors found that multiple resident room bathrooms and a handicap restroom had hot water temperatures below 100°F, including readings of 95.5°F, 88°F, and 74°F after water was run for extended periods. A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and bacteriuria said the bathroom water had only been warm, and another resident with severe dementia required assistance with toileting hygiene and handwashing. The maint. director said water could be not hot at times in rooms at the ends of the halls and that he preferred to err on the cool side to avoid scalding, while the DON and admin acknowledged residents should have access to hot water.
Failure to Obtain Consent for Bed and Chair Alarms: A resident with dementia and a history of falls had bed and chair alarms placed without a signed informed consent. The EMR had no consent on file, and observation/video showed the alarm sounding when she tried to get up, with an LVN telling her to get back in bed. The resident said the alarm bothered her, and family stated they wanted her to use her walker and move freely in her room.
PASARR screening was not updated for a resident with psychotic disorder and major depressive disorder. The resident’s MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment, and the care plan noted depression, anxiety, and psychotropic use. Staff relied on an older PASARR Level One Screening that was negative for MI/ID/DD and did not complete a new screening after learning of the resident’s mental illness diagnosis.
Surveyors identified that food in the kitchen was not properly labeled or discarded according to manufacturer instructions, and staff, including the DM, failed to perform hand hygiene upon entering the kitchen. These deficiencies were attributed to staff being sidetracked, lack of training, and recent turnover in dietary management, as confirmed by interviews and policy reviews.
Call lights not kept within reach for three residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the call lights for Resident #36, Resident #14, and Resident #32 were within reach. Resident #36 was a female with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and depression, and her quarterly MDS reflected a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her care plan identified impaired vision, communication problems, and fall risk, with an intervention to keep the call light in reach in the room and bathroom. During observations, she was heard hollering into the hallway from her bed, and her call light was found stuck between the side rail and mattress. She stated her call light was always tied to the bedrail and that she could never find it, so she hollered out when she needed help. Resident #14 was a female with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and depression, and her significant change MDS reflected a BIMS score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her care plan identified impaired vision, communication problems, verbally aggressive behaviors, and risk of not having needs met in a timely manner, with an intervention to keep the call light in reach in the room and bathroom. On two observations, she was asleep in bed while a soft touch call light was hanging behind the bed at the top of the alarm box and out of her reach. She was unable to answer questions, and her representative stated he expected the call light to be in reach and was upset that staff did not always place it there. Resident #32 was a female with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and depression, and her significant change MDS reflected a BIMS score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her care plan identified impaired vision, communication problems, verbally aggressive behaviors, and risk of not having needs met in a timely manner, with an intervention to keep the call light in reach in the room and bathroom. During observations, she was asleep in bed and her call light was stuck between the side rail and mattress. When asked, she stated she did not know where her call light was, and when it was pointed out, she was unable to reach it because it was tangled on the side rail and stuck between the mattress and bedrail. The DON and Administrator stated their expectation was for call lights to always be within reach and within sight, and the facility policy stated staff would ensure the call light was within reach and secured as needed.
Bathroom Hot Water Temperatures Below Expected Range
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when hot water temperatures in resident bathrooms were below the expected range in multiple areas of the building. Surveyors found that the restroom sink in the adjoining bathroom for two resident rooms had hot water at 95.5°F after running for more than one minute, the sink in one resident room measured 74°F after running for over five minutes, and the Hall 3 handicap restroom sink measured 88°F after running for over one minute. The report also noted that the facility failed to have water above 100°F in the restroom sink of another resident room on the same date. Resident #1 was a female with a diagnosis of bacteriuria developed during her stay and a BIMS score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her care plan included teaching related to UTI prevention, including good hygiene practices and cleansing the perineal area after bowel movements. During observation, the adjoining restroom between two resident rooms had hot water measured at 95.5°F. During interview, Resident #1 stated she wanted the bathroom water hotter and said it had only been warm in the restroom since she had lived there. Resident #40 was a female with dementia and a BIMS score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required setup assistance for toileting hygiene and supervision for personal hygiene, including washing hands. During observation, the restroom connected to her room had cool water at the sink, and later the hot water in that room's bathroom sink measured 74°F. The maintenance director stated the facility had two water heaters on Hall 1, that water could be not hot at times in the rooms at the ends of the other two halls, and that he preferred to err on the cool side to avoid scalding. The DON stated a normal person would want hot water in a bathroom sink, and the administrator stated he expected residents to have access to hot water within state guidelines of 100°F to 110°F.
Failure to Obtain Consent for Bed and Chair Alarms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident with severely impaired cognition was fully informed of, and able to participate in, her treatment when bed and chair alarms were placed on her wheelchair and bed without a signed informed consent. Resident #40 was a female with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with mood disturbance, repeated falls, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and osteoporosis. Her quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 05, indicating severely impaired cognition, and she had a family member listed as her medical and financial POA. Record review showed the resident’s care plan included pressure sensitive alarms to the wheelchair, recliner, and bed to alert staff to unassisted transfers. Her active physician orders included alarms to the bed and wheelchair for attempts to transfer unassisted due to falls and dementia. The EMR contained no signed consent for either the chair alarm or the bed alarm. The facility’s fall risk assessment documented a low fall risk, and the incident log showed the resident’s last fall occurred months earlier. During observation, the resident was seen with a bed alarm in place, and she stated the alarm bothered her when it made noise. Family-provided video showed the resident repeatedly getting up in her room, the alarm sounding, and an LVN telling her to get back in bed. The resident’s family member stated the alarm restricted the resident’s movement and that they wanted her to use her walker and walk in her room. The DON and administrator stated they did not consider the alarm a restraint and did not think consent was needed for a bed or chair alarm.
PASARR screening not updated for resident with mental illness diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all level II residents and residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition were referred for level II resident review after a significant change in status assessment for one resident. Resident #2 was a [AGE]-year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Psychotic Disorder with delusions and Major Depressive Disorder, and no diagnosis of dementia. Her quarterly MDS dated 04/15/2026 showed a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and her care plan dated 03/12/2026 identified depression, anxiety, and use of psychotropic drugs. Resident #2’s PASARR Level One Screening Form, dated 02/03/2025, stated she did not have a primary diagnosis of dementia and was negative for mental illness, intellectual disability, or developmental disability, and the form had not been updated. During interview, the MDS coordinator stated the PASARR Level One Screening had been completed by another facility before admission and, because it showed negative mental illness, she did not take further action and did not know additional steps were required. The RCN stated that once the facility learned Resident #2 had a mental illness diagnosis, a new PASARR Level One Screening should have been completed and the PASRR process followed, which would have triggered a PASARR Level Two Screening evaluation.
Deficient Food Storage, Labeling, and Hand Hygiene in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple failures in the facility's kitchen regarding food storage, labeling, and staff hand hygiene. The Dietary Manager (DM) was seen entering the kitchen from the dining room on two occasions without performing hand hygiene, and on one occasion, handed a scoop to the cook before washing his hands. In the refrigerator, a container of ham was found out of its original packaging without any labeling to indicate the item description, open date, or use-by date. Additionally, an open carton of thickened milk was found with an open date that exceeded the manufacturer's recommended discard period, as the instructions specified discarding within four days of opening. Interviews with the DM and Dietician confirmed that the facility's expectations and policies required proper labeling of food items, adherence to manufacturer discard dates, and hand hygiene upon entering the kitchen. The DM acknowledged responsibility for monitoring these practices and attributed the failures to staff being sidetracked and recent staff turnover. The Dietician also cited lack of proper training and turnover in dietary management as contributing factors. Review of facility policies corroborated the requirements for food labeling, discard dates, and hand washing upon re-entry into the kitchen.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 119 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Clyde
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir At Baird | 5.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Brightpointe At Lytle Lake | 13 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Silver Spring | 13.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| The Oaks At Radford Hills Healthcare Center | 13.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation | 14.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Clyde Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.