Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Capstone Healthcare Of Perryton during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with intact cognition and diagnoses including anxiety disorder and an above-knee amputation was wheeled from the transport van into the facility wearing only a hospital gown, with approximately five inches of his naked bottom visible from the back of his wheelchair. He was taken past the nurses' station and several seated residents, who laughed and reacted to the exposure; the AD said she was not aware the resident was exposed, while multiple staff members stated this was a dignity and privacy issue.
A resident was admitted to hospice, but the facility did not complete a significant change MDS within the required timeframe. The quarterly MDS and care plan did not reflect hospice services, and the DON stated she did not realize a significant change MDS was needed when the resident entered hospice care.
A resident’s admission MDS incorrectly indicated no tobacco use even though the care plan and smoking evaluation identified him as a smoker. The resident stated he was a smoker during observation, and the DON acknowledged the MDS error was likely human mistake; the ADM stated inaccurate MDS coding could lead to inaccurate care.
The facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation when money went missing from a resident's room and was not reported to the State Survey Agency within the required 24-hour timeframe. The ADM was on vacation when the incident occurred and only reported it after returning, while the DON, who was aware of the missing money on the day it was discovered, did not submit a report, stating she hoped the money would be found. Facility policies required that all allegations of theft/misappropriation be reported to appropriate agencies within specified federal timeframes, including within 24 hours for non-abuse, non–serious bodily injury events, but this requirement was not met.
Resident exposed during admission transport through common area
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect when he was wheeled into the facility from the transport van wearing only a hospital gown and with approximately five inches of his naked bottom visible between the back and seat of his wheelchair. The resident was a [AGE]-year-old male admitted with diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder and acquired absence of the right leg above knee, and his EHR showed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. During the admission, he was wheeled past the nurses' station and between four residents seated in the common area while his bottom remained exposed. As the resident was brought through the area, two residents began laughing loudly and poking each other, and one resident gestured to the AD and whispered in her ear. One resident later stated they were laughing at the exposed bottom and that she had told the AD it was visible. The AD stated she was not aware the resident's bottom was visible and said she could not change him on the van. Multiple staff members, including HSK, CNA A, CNA B, CNA C, the DON, and the ADM, stated that wheeling a resident through common areas with a naked bottom exposed was not okay and was a dignity and privacy issue. The resident stated he was unaware his bottom was visible and did not care that other residents saw it.
Failure to Complete Significant Change MDS for Hospice Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a significant change MDS assessment within 14 days after determining that Resident #5 had a significant change in condition when she was admitted to hospice services. Record review showed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with hospice as her primary payer, and an active order dated 06/10/26 indicated she was to be admitted to hospice services. The resident’s most recent quarterly assessment was completed on 06/02/26, and the EHR showed no significant change MDS assessment in the last year. The assessment also did not reflect hospice services, and the care plan completed on 06/07/26 did not mention hospice. During interview, the DON stated she was responsible for completing MDS assessments and used the RAI manual as her guide. She stated significant change MDS assessments were to be completed within 14 days of the change and acknowledged she did not realize a significant change MDS was needed for Resident #5 entering hospice care. The ADM stated the DON was responsible for MDS completion and that failure to complete the assessment within the allotted time could negatively affect the resident’s care.
Inaccurate MDS Tobacco Coding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #28’s assessment accurately reflected his status when the admission MDS completed with an ARD of 07/29/25 coded that he did not use tobacco in Section J, despite other records showing he was a smoker. The resident’s care plan identified him as a smoker, and a Smoking and Safety evaluation dated 07/22/25 stated that he used tobacco and was to be used for his smoking care plan on admission. During observation on 06/24/26, Resident #28 was lying on his back in bed and stated that he was a smoker. The DON stated she was responsible for completing MDS assessments and that an inaccurate MDS could negatively impact resident care, and she said the tobacco coding error was probably a human mistake. The ADM stated the DON was responsible for MDS completion and that an inaccurate MDS could lead to staff providing inaccurate care to the resident.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Misappropriation of Resident Property
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation of resident property to the State Survey Agency as required. Money went missing from a resident's room on 12/29/25, but the incident was not reported to the state until 01/05/26. Interview with the ADM revealed she was on vacation when the money went missing and only became aware of the incident upon her return on 01/05/26, at which time she reported it and initiated an investigation. Record review confirmed that the incident date was documented as 12/29/25 and the report to the state was made on 01/05/26 at 8:12 p.m., exceeding the 24-hour reporting requirement for allegations that do not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. During interview, the ADM stated that in her absence the DON was responsible for reporting incidents to the State Agency and that the DON knew how to complete such reports. The DON acknowledged that it was both her and the ADM's responsibility to report incidents of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation and admitted she did not report the missing money on the day it was discovered. She stated she should have reported the incident but was hoping the money would be found. Facility policies on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation, including the September 2022 policy defining "immediately" as within 24 hours for non-abuse, non–serious bodily injury allegations, required that all such reports be made to local, state, and federal agencies within regulatory timeframes, which did not occur in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 10 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Perryton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Oaks Manor | 15.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Hansford Manor | 25.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Beaver County Nursing Home | 34.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Capstone Healthcare Of Perryton.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.