Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sanford Chamberlain Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple chronic wounds, diabetes, PVD, MRSA, edema, and pain left the facility for therapeutic leave home visits without a physician order for the leave, without a care plan entry for the leave, and without an order for a return assessment. Staff stated his medications were not sent, and wound supplies were likely not sent either, despite the resident requiring extensive wound care and dressing changes. The DON confirmed the lack of a therapeutic leave order and said wound supplies should have been sent, while the MDS coordinator stated the leave was not addressed on the care plan.
The facility did not obtain food from approved or satisfactory sources and failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food according to professional standards.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment experienced multiple falls and was handled roughly and restrained by a CNA, who failed to notify a nurse or request assistance. Several staff members, including an LPN and other support staff, witnessed the incidents but did not intervene or report the abuse. The resident was not assessed after the falls, and staff failed to follow required protocols. Training records showed that many staff had not received abuse and neglect education, and facility policy on reporting abuse was not followed.
Two residents with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls experienced repeated falls, including one resulting in a hip fracture, due to the facility's failure to update care plans and implement new fall prevention interventions after each incident. Staff did not consistently document or apply new strategies, and there was confusion about where to find or how to update fall interventions in the EMR, despite management expectations and facility policy.
Two residents with severe cognitive impairment experienced multiple changes in condition, including repeated falls and changes in transfer and hospice status, but their care plans were not updated to reflect new interventions or current needs. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding of care plan responsibilities, and documentation showed that required updates and interventions were often missing or incomplete.
A facility failed to implement an action plan after a resident with cognitive impairment became aggressive, striking another resident. Staff lacked adequate training to manage dementia-related behaviors, relying on online courses without hands-on training. Additionally, there was insufficient communication of care plan updates, leaving staff unprepared to handle the resident's unpredictable behavior.
A resident fell and suffered head trauma while attempting to sit on a whirlpool chair due to the brakes not being locked by a CNA. The resident, who had a history of falls and required supervision for bathing, sustained injuries and required emergency room treatment. The CNA had been trained on safety measures, but there was no signage in the tub room about locking the chair wheels, and the manufacturer's instructions were not readily available.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of dehydration was found to have inadequate fluid intake, leading to dehydration and a urinary tract infection. Despite water being available, fluid intake was not consistently documented, and the resident's intake was significantly below recommended levels. The resident also experienced significant weight fluctuations, with no follow-up on documented weight loss, highlighting a deficiency in care.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of frequent falls did not receive the required neurological checks after a fall, as per the facility's policy. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including Tourette's and prostate cancer, was later diagnosed with rib fractures, a UTI, and dehydration. The facility's policy mandated specific neurological checks following unwitnessed falls, which were not documented as completed.
A resident with a history of trauma expressed fear and suicidal thoughts after an unwanted entry into her room by another resident with cognitive impairment. The facility failed to implement adequate interventions to prevent further incidents. Additionally, two residents engaged in repeated verbal and physical altercations, with insufficient interventions to prevent these incidents. The facility's abuse prevention policies were not effectively implemented, contributing to the deficiency.
A facility failed to conduct required trauma screenings for residents, including one with a history of PTSD and recent psychiatric hospitalization. The licensed social worker confirmed the screenings were not completed as required by the facility's trauma-informed care policy. Additionally, the DON did not review hospital notes for a resident returning from psychiatric care.
The facility failed to update care plans for several residents, leading to deficiencies in care. A resident fell during a transfer due to outdated care plan instructions, while another resident's care plan did not address his wandering and aggressive behavior. Additionally, a resident with PTSD and recent psychiatric hospitalization had an incomplete care plan, lacking details on her mental health needs and safety plan.
A resident with dementia and Alzheimer's disease eloped from the facility and fell, requiring emergency evaluation. Despite wearing a Wander Guard, the resident exited through the front doors without staff knowledge. The facility's interventions, including monitoring and the Wander Guard, were insufficient to prevent the incident. Staff were alerted by a passerby, but the resident had already sustained injuries. The care plan lacked specific boundaries for safe wandering, and the facility's policy required an incident report and care plan revision after elopement.
The facility failed to maintain food safety and cleanliness in two kitchenettes, with observations of unclean refrigerators, unlabeled food items, and dirty kitchen surfaces. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and responsibility for cleaning and maintenance, with inconsistencies in following cleaning checklists and policies. The dietary department, responsible for these tasks, did not ensure proper labeling and dating of food items, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with dementia and Alzheimer's disease eloped from the facility on three occasions, but two incidents were not reported to the South Dakota Department of Health as required. The Director of Nursing and the Director of Nursing Trainer initially misinterpreted these incidents as non-elopements. Upon review, it was confirmed that these incidents should have been reported, as per the facility's policy.
A resident at risk for skin injuries developed a wound on the left buttock, which was not promptly assessed or reported to the physician. The facility failed to conduct weekly skin assessments and document the wound's status, leading to inconsistencies in care. Nursing staff interviews revealed confusion in the skin assessment process, and the facility's policy on skin breakdown prevention was not effectively implemented.
Therapeutic Leave Lacked Orders and Needed Supplies Were Not Sent
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to have physician orders for therapeutic leave for one sampled resident who routinely left the facility for home visits. Resident 33 was his own decision-maker and used a wheelchair for mobility. His record showed multiple diagnoses, including pressure ulcer of the sacral region, diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, peripheral vascular disease, osteomyelitis of the vertebra and sacrococcygeal region, MRSA infection, localized edema, pain, and shortness of breath. The record also showed no physician order to complete a head-to-toe assessment when he returned from therapeutic leave, no physician order for the therapeutic leave home visits, and no care plan addressing therapeutic leave. Resident 33 had physician orders for multiple medications and extensive wound and skin treatments, including diabetic foot and nail care, compression devices, heel lift boots, Santyl to several wounds, Dakin's solution, wound cleansing, dressings, and edema care. The LPN stated the resident would leave for therapeutic leave home visits and that briefs and extra clothes were sent with him, but she did not think wound supplies were sent and said medications were not sent because there was no physician order to do so. She also stated the resident had returned with maggots in his wounds one time and that after that incident he would receive a shower, a head-to-toe assessment, and inspection of his wheelchair and personal items when he returned, although he had refused those assessments and inspections at times. The DON agreed the resident did not have a physician order for therapeutic leave and stated wound supplies should have been sent with him. He also stated medications were not sent with the resident and believed there was an order not to send them, but he could not provide that order. The MDS coordinator stated the resident's therapeutic leaves were not on the care plan. The facility policy for therapeutic leave stated the resident should be provided necessary medications, diet instructions, and activity restrictions using the therapeutic leave medication list.
Failure to Follow Food Procurement and Safety Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to procure food from sources that are approved or considered satisfactory and did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards. This deficiency was identified during the survey process, indicating that the facility did not meet regulatory requirements for food safety and handling. No additional details about specific residents, staff, or events are provided in the report.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse and Staff Inaction
Penalty
Summary
A certified nursing assistant (CNA) responded to multiple falls of a resident with severe cognitive impairment by using physical force and restraint, without notifying a nurse or requesting assistance. The CNA lifted the resident from the floor alone, despite the resident resisting, and placed him roughly into his wheelchair. The CNA also locked the wheelchair brakes, preventing the resident from moving, and did not seek a nurse's assessment after the falls. Video footage confirmed these actions, and the resident was observed to have bruises on his arms corresponding to where the CNA had grabbed him. The resident displayed increased anxiety during interactions with the CNA. Eight additional staff members, including other CNAs, a licensed practical nurse (LPN), certified medication assistants (CMAs), and food service staff, were present during these incidents but did not intervene or report the abuse to a supervisor at the time. The LPN did not assess the resident after the falls, and staff did not assist the resident or stop the CNA from using rough handling. The resident was left on the floor for an extended period after one fall, and staff failed to follow protocols for post-fall assessment and safe transfer. Review of training records revealed that several staff members, including contracted travel staff and long-term employees, had not received required abuse and neglect training. Documentation of abuse and neglect training was missing for multiple staff, and recent staff meetings and training sessions did not include education on abuse or neglect. The facility's policy required all staff to report suspected abuse or neglect, but this was not followed during the incidents described.
Failure to Revise and Implement Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement, review, and revise fall prevention interventions for two residents with a history of falls, resulting in repeated falls and injury. One resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and had recently been evaluated by physical therapy, experienced a change in transfer status but this was not updated in the care plan. After a fall that resulted in a hip fracture, there was no evidence that new or revised interventions were implemented or documented, and the care plan was not updated to reflect changes in transfer needs or fall prevention strategies. Additionally, the resident's admission to hospice and the need for an air mattress overlay were not reflected in the care plan, and recommended interventions such as increased toileting were not added after previous falls. Another resident, also severely cognitively impaired with multiple neuropsychiatric diagnoses, experienced at least 15 falls over a two-month period, including four falls in a single day. Video footage showed that after each fall, the resident was returned to the same position without new interventions to prevent further incidents. Staff did not consistently document or implement new fall prevention measures after each event, and the care plan was not updated with additional interventions despite repeated falls. Some incident reports lacked any documented interventions, and post-fall investigation tools were often incomplete. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of training and uncertainty about where to find or how to update fall interventions in the electronic medical record. While there was an expectation from management that care plans be updated in real time after a fall, staff reported not receiving education on this process and not routinely referencing the care plan for fall interventions. The facility's policy required interdisciplinary review of falls and implementation of new interventions, but this was not consistently followed in practice.
Failure to Update and Revise Care Plans After Changes in Resident Status and Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed and revised to reflect the current care needs for two residents. For the first resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease, there were repeated falls over a two-month period. Despite multiple falls and high fall risk assessments, the care plan was not updated with new interventions after several incidents. Documentation showed that interventions were either not implemented or not recorded after many of the falls, and post-fall investigation tools were often left incomplete. The care plan was only updated after a significant delay, and did not reflect the ongoing changes in the resident's condition or the interventions that were (or should have been) put in place following each fall. For the second resident, who was also severely cognitively impaired and had a history of falls, the care plan was not updated to reflect changes in transfer status, fall prevention interventions, or hospice status. After a change in transfer method and two falls—one resulting in a hip fracture—there was no evidence that the care plan was revised to include new interventions or to address the resident's current needs. Additionally, the care plan still referenced equipment (an air mattress overlay) that was no longer in use, and did not reflect the resident's re-admission to hospice services. Interviews with staff revealed confusion and inconsistency regarding who was responsible for updating care plans and how interventions were communicated. While some staff referenced the care plan in the electronic medical record to guide care, others were unsure where to find updated interventions. The facility's policy required care plans to be revised as residents' needs changed, but this was not consistently followed, resulting in care plans that did not accurately reflect the residents' current care requirements.
Failure to Implement Action Plan and Training for Aggressive Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a plan of action following an incident where a resident with cognitive impairment became physically aggressive, striking another resident in the face. The aggressive resident's behaviors were described as impulsive and unpredictable, posing a potential risk to both residents and staff. Despite the severity of the incident, there was no immediate plan or education provided to staff on how to manage such behaviors effectively. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that staff were adequately trained to handle residents with dementia and psychosocial behaviors. Interviews with staff revealed that their training on dementia and abuse was primarily conducted online, with no additional hands-on training provided. This lack of comprehensive training left staff unprepared to manage the aggressive behaviors of the resident, leading to a situation where staff and other residents were at risk. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure that all direct caregivers were informed of updated care plan changes for residents. Staff interviews indicated a reliance on verbal communication for care plan updates, with no formal documentation or process in place to ensure all staff were aware of changes. This lack of communication and documentation contributed to the inadequate handling of the resident's aggressive behavior, as staff were not fully informed of the appropriate interventions to use.
Resident Falls Due to Unlocked Whirlpool Chair Brakes
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to ensure the safety of a resident who fell and suffered head trauma while attempting to sit on a whirlpool chair. The incident occurred because the brakes on the whirlpool tub chair were not locked by a certified nursing assistant (CNA), leading to the chair sliding and the resident falling forward onto her face. The resident sustained supraorbital bruises, a skin tear on her right wrist, and required emergency room treatment. The resident, who had a history of falls and was at risk due to a stroke affecting her left side, was taking multiple medications that could contribute to falls. She was independent with a front-wheeled walker but required supervision for bathing. The CNA involved had recently completed orientation and had been trained on safe resident handling, including the importance of locking brakes on equipment. However, there was no signage in the tub room indicating the need to lock the tub chair wheels, and the CNA was unaware of the location of the manufacturer's instructions. The facility's policies required the use of appropriate safety measures and adherence to manufacturer's directions for equipment operation. Despite this, the communication to staff about locking brakes on shower and bath chairs was informal, with no documentation to confirm that nursing staff had read the instructions. The incident highlights a lapse in ensuring that all staff were adequately informed and reminded of safety protocols, particularly concerning the operation of bathing equipment.
Inadequate Fluid Intake Leads to Dehydration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate fluid intake for a resident, leading to dehydration. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and had a history of prostate cancer, urinary tract infections, and dehydration, was found on the floor multiple times, including an incident on December 8th. Following this fall, the resident exhibited confusion, lethargy, and back pain, and was later diagnosed with rib fractures, a urinary tract infection, and dehydration at a clinic visit. Observations and interviews revealed that while water was available in the resident's room, there was no consistent documentation of fluid intake outside of meals unless the resident was on a fluid restriction. The resident's fluid intake was significantly below the recommended 1,500 ml per day, with averages ranging from 480 ml to 980 ml over different weeks in December. Additionally, there was a lack of documentation for several meals, and the nursing staff did not chart fluid intake unless specifically required. The resident experienced significant weight fluctuations, with a notable weight loss from 156 pounds to 138 pounds within a week. Despite the facility's policy to reweigh residents with significant weight changes, no daily weights were completed after the documented weight loss. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of communication and follow-up regarding the resident's nutritional and hydration needs, contributing to the deficiency in care.
Failure to Complete Neurological Checks After Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to ensure that neurological checks were completed for a resident after a fall, as required by their policy. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, was found on the floor beside his bed on 12/8/24. Despite the resident's history of frequent falls and his diagnoses, including Tourette's, urinary retention, weakness, urinary tract infection, dehydration, and prostate cancer, the necessary neurological checks were not documented as completed on the day shift on 12/9/24 and 12/10/24 or the night shift on 12/9/24. The facility's policy required neurological checks to be conducted every 15 minutes for four times, every hour for two times, every two hours for two times, and every four hours for two times following an unwitnessed fall. However, these checks were not performed as per the policy. The resident was later diagnosed with three rib fractures, a urinary tract infection, and dehydration after being sent to the clinic due to the inability to collect a urine sample. The resident reported falling at least once a week and sometimes every other day, indicating a pattern of falls that required careful monitoring and adherence to the facility's fall prevention and follow-up policy.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse and Aggression
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to ensure the safety and well-being of a resident with a history of trauma, who expressed feelings of fear, feeling unsafe, and suicidal thoughts after an unwanted entry into her room by another resident with cognitive impairment. This resident had previously experienced an incident where the cognitively impaired resident attempted to strangle her, causing her significant distress and fear for her safety. Despite these incidents, the facility did not implement adequate interventions to prevent further unwanted encounters, leading to the resident feeling unsafe and expressing suicidal thoughts. Additionally, the provider failed to prevent acts of verbal and physical aggression between two residents. One resident, who was cognitively impaired, had multiple altercations with another resident, including incidents where they yelled, swore, and physically attacked each other. The facility's interventions were insufficient to prevent these altercations, as evidenced by repeated incidents of aggression between the two residents. The facility's policies and procedures for abuse prevention were not effectively implemented, as evidenced by the lack of adequate interventions to protect residents from aggression and unwanted encounters. The facility's failure to review psychiatric hospital notes and update care plans further contributed to the deficiency, as staff were not adequately informed of the residents' needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict or neglect.
Failure to Conduct Required Trauma Screenings
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to ensure that trauma-informed care was provided to residents by not conducting necessary trauma screenings. One resident, who had a history of severe depression, PTSD, and anxiety, was not screened for PTSD upon admission, quarterly, annually, or after returning from an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization for suicidal ideations. This resident had been hospitalized for suicidal thoughts and had a history of PTSD related to abuse from her first husband. Despite receiving counseling from a mental health therapist, the required trauma screenings were not completed. Two other residents also did not receive the necessary trauma screenings. One resident, with severe cognitive impairment, was not screened for trauma upon admission, quarterly, or annually, and there was no documentation indicating an inability to complete the screening. Another resident, with moderate cognitive impairment, did not receive a trauma screen upon admission or on a quarterly basis, and the annual trauma screen for 2024 was not completed, although one was done in 2023. The licensed social worker responsible for conducting trauma screenings confirmed that the screenings were not completed for these residents as required. Additionally, the director of nursing did not review the hospital notes upon the return of the resident who had been hospitalized for psychiatric reasons. The facility's trauma-informed care policy mandates trauma assessments within five days of admission and as needed, but these were not adhered to, leading to the deficiencies noted in the report.
Care Plan Deficiencies in Resident Transfers and Behavioral Management
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed and revised for four sampled residents, leading to deficiencies in care. Resident 4 experienced a fall during a transfer when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) used a stand aid lift without the required assistance of a second staff member, as per the facility's policy. Despite the resident not being injured, the care plan was outdated and did not reflect the current requirement for a full body mechanical lift due to the resident's recent surgery and weight limitations. Resident 2 exhibited wandering behavior and had a history of physical aggression towards other residents and staff. The care plan did not include interventions to prevent him from entering other residents' rooms or address his aggressive behavior. Additionally, the care plan contained outdated information, such as the names of staff members who were no longer employed, and did not reflect the interventions staff were utilizing for his wandering and behaviors. Resident 1, who had a history of PTSD and recent psychiatric hospitalization, did not have a care plan that included her suicidal ideations, PTSD, or her safety plan. The resident expressed feeling unsafe due to an incident where Resident 2 attempted to strangle her. The facility's policies on dementia care and trauma-informed care were not adequately reflected in the care plans, leading to a lack of individualized, person-centered care for the residents involved.
Resident Elopement and Injury Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to ensure the safety of a resident who eloped from the facility without staff knowledge and subsequently fell, requiring evaluation at the emergency department. The incident occurred when the resident, who had a history of elopement and wore a Wander Guard device, exited the building through the front double doors. The Wander Guard was the primary intervention in place to prevent elopement, but it was not effective in this instance. Staff were supposed to monitor the resident closely, but there were no set times or frequencies for rounds or documentation of these checks. The resident, who had been diagnosed with dementia and Alzheimer's disease, was ambulatory and did not use assistive devices. On the day of the incident, the resident was found outside the building with lacerations on his nose and lips after tripping and falling. The facility's staff responded to the situation after being alerted by a passerby, but the resident had already sustained injuries by the time they reached him. The resident's care plan included the use of a Wander Guard and maintaining a calm environment, but it lacked specific boundaries for safe wandering. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident had previously eloped on multiple occasions, and the facility's interventions were limited to monitoring during normal rounding and the use of a Wander Guard. The facility's policy required an incident report and a revised care plan following an elopement, but the report does not detail any additional interventions or changes made to prevent future incidents. The deficiency highlights a lack of adequate supervision and effective interventions to prevent elopement and ensure resident safety.
Failure to Maintain Food Safety and Cleanliness in Kitchenettes
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to adhere to necessary food safety guidelines in two kitchenettes located in the 100 and 200 hallways. Observations revealed that the exterior and interior of the refrigerators were unclean, with dried substances and unlabeled, undated food items such as vanilla frosting, bagels, sliced cheeses, salad dressings, and various sauces. The freezers contained unlabeled and undated pre-cooked pancakes and microwave bacon. Additionally, the water dispenser and ice machine were found with lime scale and slime buildup, and the kitchen surfaces and appliances, including the toaster, microwave, and stove, were unclean with dried food particles and grease. Interviews with staff, including the environmental services supervisor, director of nursing, and infection control nurse, highlighted a lack of awareness and responsibility for the cleanliness and maintenance of the kitchenettes. The dietary department, employed by the adjacent hospital, was responsible for cleaning and maintaining the kitchenettes, but failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated. The infection control nurse admitted to not auditing the kitchenettes for infection control standards, and the director of nursing was unaware of the cleaning chemicals accessible to residents. Further interviews with the cook and nutrition and food services supervisor revealed inconsistencies in cleaning practices and checklist completion. The cook admitted to cleaning the kitchen daily but only checking the fridge weekly, while the supervisor checked the kitchenettes twice a week but noted incomplete cleaning checklists. The provider's policies on equipment cleaning and leftover foods were not followed, as evidenced by the unclean kitchenettes and unlabeled food items. The lack of adherence to these policies contributed to the deficiency in maintaining a clean and safe food environment.
Failure to Report Elopement Incidents to Authorities
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to notify the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) of two elopement incidents involving a resident diagnosed with dementia and Alzheimer's disease. The resident, who had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating an unsuccessful interview, eloped from the facility on three occasions. On the first occasion, the resident was found outside the facility after another resident alerted staff. On the second occasion, the resident was found walking outside but had not yet reached the parking lot. These incidents were not reported to the SD DOH as required. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Nursing Trainer (DONT) revealed a lack of awareness and misinterpretation of the incidents as non-elopements. The DONT initially did not consider the incidents as elopements because they were witnessed by another resident or because the resident had not reached the parking lot. However, upon reviewing the nurse's progress notes, the DONT confirmed that these incidents should have been classified as elopements and reported accordingly. The facility's policy required incident reporting and care plan revisions following elopements, which were not adhered to in these cases.
Failure in Timely Skin Assessment and Physician Notification
Penalty
Summary
The provider failed to ensure timely skin assessments and notification to the physician for a resident identified at risk for developing skin injuries. The resident, who had a history of boils in the affected area, developed a wound on the left buttock. The wound was initially observed by a nursing supervisor and wound care nurse, who noted it was healing but had not been promptly assessed or reported to the physician when first identified. The resident's medical record indicated a care plan for impaired skin, but the interventions were not consistently followed. The CNA Skin Inspection Report showed discrepancies in documentation, with a sore identified on different dates and locations, but not consistently followed up by licensed nursing staff. The wound was not assessed by a nurse on a weekly basis as required, and there was a lack of documentation in the nurse's progress notes regarding the wound's status. Interviews with nursing staff revealed confusion and inconsistency in the skin assessment process. The wound care nurse admitted that the resident was not on a weekly assessment schedule, and the CNA's role in identifying skin concerns was misunderstood. The facility's policy on skin breakdown prevention was not effectively implemented, as deviations in skin assessment were not documented in the resident's clinical record, and a formal policy for assessing a resident's skin was not provided during the survey.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Chamberlain
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora Brule Nursing Home Inc | 31.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Platte Care Center | 37.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Avera Rosebud Country Care Center | 38.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Winner Regional Healthcare Center | 38.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Sanford Chamberlain Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.