Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Oakhaven Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to ensure consistent documentation of a resident's advance directive between the EHR and hard chart. The resident had a signed DNR order, but the EHR incorrectly showed a full code status. Staff interviews revealed that social services manage advance directives, but the discrepancy was not resolved, risking the facility's ability to honor the resident's wishes.
Inconsistent Advance Directive Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the advance directive information for a resident was consistent between the electronic health record (EHR) and the hard chart. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required partial assistance for activities, had a documented Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order signed by both the resident and the physician. However, a review of the resident's medical record revealed a discrepancy: the hard chart indicated a DNR status, while the EHR showed a full code status. Interviews with facility staff, including a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), the Unit Manager (UM), and the Director of Nursing (DON), highlighted the process for handling advance directives. The CNA mentioned that the social worker is responsible for placing advance directives in the charts, and any discrepancies are reported to the unit manager. The UM explained that residents are initially considered full code until a DNR order is signed by a physician, and discrepancies are checked against the physician's signed order. The DON stated that social services manage advance directives and conduct rounds to ensure any necessary changes are made. Despite these procedures, the inconsistency between the EHR and hard chart was not addressed, potentially impacting the facility's ability to honor the resident's advance directive decision.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 31 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Darlington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medford Nursing Center | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Bethea Baptist Healthcare Center | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Presbyterian Communities Of South Carolina-florenc | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Honorage Nursing Center | 7.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Carlyle Senior Care Of Florence | 8.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Oakhaven Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.