Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Adviniacare Pawtucket Pleasant Rehab Center, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with hypo-osmolality, hyponatremia, and psychogenic polydipsia had physician and NP orders for a 1500 mL/day fluid restriction with specific allocations per meal and nursing shift, and instructions for staff to monitor and document daily fluid intake. NAs reported they did not document or communicate fluid amounts for residents, while an LPN indicated that intake was marked as completed in the TAR without recording actual volumes. Record review showed only check marks for completion of the fluid restriction order, with no per-shift intake amounts documented, contrary to the detailed physician order and the expectations of the Medical Director and Administrator.
A resident did not receive the specialized rehabilitative services required for their care, as the facility failed to provide or arrange for these necessary interventions according to the resident's care plan.
Nursing staff failed to demonstrate proper infection control practices for a resident requiring contact precautions due to an ESBL infection. Multiple staff members entered the resident's room without performing hand hygiene or using required PPE, and interviews revealed a lack of understanding about contact precaution protocols, despite having completed infection control competencies.
A nursing home area was found to have accident hazards and lacked adequate supervision, resulting in a deficiency for not preventing accidents as required.
A resident with ESBL in the urine had a physician's order for contact precautions, but a nursing assistant repeatedly entered the room without performing hand hygiene or donning required PPE, despite posted signage. The staff member was unaware of the precautions, and leadership confirmed the expectation for proper infection control measures.
A resident with dementia and malnutrition did not receive wound care services in accordance with professional standards, as required physician orders for wound treatments were missing, and wound dressings were not properly labeled with date or initials. Gaps in treatment documentation and order transcription were confirmed by nursing staff, resulting in missed or undocumented wound care for both a non-pressure wound and an unstageable pressure ulcer.
Surveyors identified widespread sanitation and maintenance deficiencies, including mold-like substances in shower stalls, persistent urine odors, stained toilets, and physical disrepair such as holes in walls and cluttered common areas. These issues were observed across all units and were confirmed by facility leadership during inspection.
A resident admitted with bacteremia missed four doses of the prescribed antibiotic Bactrim due to an incorrect transcription of the medication start date. The facility failed to notify a provider or use available Bactrim tablets from the Pyxis machine. The resident's condition worsened, leading to a hospital transfer for urosepsis treatment. Staff interviews revealed communication lapses and failure to address the medication error.
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment for two residents with foley catheters. One resident, admitted with a UTI and sepsis, removed their catheter, and staff did not consistently document urinary output or notify a provider of low output until the resident's condition worsened. Another resident with neuromuscular bladder dysfunction had undocumented urinary output on several occasions. Staff interviews revealed an expectation for documentation, but it was not consistently followed.
The facility failed to accurately assess residents' tobacco use and range of motion. Four residents were documented as smokers, yet their MDS assessments incorrectly indicated no tobacco use. Additionally, a resident with a left-hand contracture was inaccurately assessed as having no range of motion impairments. The MDS Coordinator and DON could not provide evidence for the correct coding.
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by residents with MDROs not being placed on necessary precautions, improper use of PPE during medication administration via a feeding tube, and improper storage of humidified oxygen. Additionally, a BiPAP machine was not cleaned according to policy, and the filter was missing.
A resident with Parkinson's disease and dysphagia was not positioned upright at 90 degrees during meals, contrary to a physician's order. Observations on multiple occasions confirmed this deficiency, and staff interviews acknowledged the oversight.
A facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with an indwelling foley catheter by not consistently measuring and recording urinary output. Despite the care plan's requirement, the facility missed 46 out of 51 opportunities to document this critical information, as confirmed by the DON during a surveyor interview.
A facility failed to ensure a resident receiving nutrition and medications via a g-tube received appropriate treatment to prevent complications. An LPN was observed administering medications without checking for proper g-tube placement, contrary to facility policy and a physician's order. The LPN acknowledged the oversight, and the DON could not provide evidence of appropriate treatment.
A facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with a rate of 16.67% observed during a survey. An LPN was seen crushing and mixing medications for a resident and administering them via g-tube using a piston syringe, against facility policy. The medications included Nortriptyline, Cyanocobalamin, Cholecalciferol, Folic Acid, and Metoprolol Tartrate. The LPN admitted to not following the correct procedure, and the DNS confirmed the error without evidence of compliance with the required error rate.
A resident with specific dietary preferences for soft salad sandwiches did not receive them during lunch meals, despite these preferences being documented in their care plan and noted on their meal tray ticket. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the oversight, with staff unable to explain why the sandwiches were not provided, even though they were available.
A resident with multiple mental health diagnoses did not receive prescribed medications due to transcription errors, leading to worsening depression and anxiety. The facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care, as staff were unaware of the medication errors.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and on anticoagulant medication was found with bruises, but the physician was not notified. Hospice recommendations, including holding the anticoagulant and administering morphine, were implemented without physician approval. The facility's policy requires physician notification for changes in condition, which was not followed.
Failure to Monitor and Document Fluid Intake for Resident on Fluid Restriction
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a resident with fluid restrictions received treatment and care in accordance with physician orders and professional standards. The resident was re-admitted in December 2025 with diagnoses including hypo-osmolality and hypernatremia, and had a care plan noting potential for fluid overload related to polydipsia and hyponatremia. A physician’s order dated 12/12/2025 directed staff to encourage the resident to limit fluid intake every shift for monitoring. After the resident was found on the bathroom floor with a large lump on the forehead and sent to the hospital, the hospital documented psychogenic polydipsia and hyponatremia with a sodium level of 119 and serum osmolality of 252, and recommended a 1500 mL fluid restriction. Following this, a 12/24/2025 physician order specified a 1500 mL/day fluid restriction with detailed allocations for dietary and nursing fluids per meal and per shift, and the NP reinforced the importance of adherence and instructed nursing staff to monitor daily fluid intake and report acute changes. Despite these orders, staff interviews revealed that NAs did not document or communicate the amount of fluids consumed for any residents, while an LPN stated that fluid intake for this resident was documented by NAs and signed off as completed in the TAR. Record review showed that the fluid restriction orders were only marked as completed with check marks, with no documentation of the actual amounts of fluid provided or consumed per shift as ordered. The Medical Director stated an expectation that intake amounts be monitored and documented per shift, and the Administrator acknowledged that the facility failed to monitor the resident’s fluid intake according to the physician’s order.
Failure to Provide Required Specialized Rehabilitative Services
Penalty
Summary
A resident did not receive specialized rehabilitative services as required for their care. The facility failed to provide or obtain these services, which are necessary to meet the resident's assessed needs. This inaction resulted in the resident not receiving the appropriate rehabilitative interventions as indicated in their care plan.
Failure to Ensure Staff Competency in Infection Control and Contact Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, specifically regarding contact precautions for a resident with an ESBL infection in the urine. Surveyor observations revealed that a nursing assistant entered the resident's room multiple times without performing hand hygiene or donning required personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gowns and gloves, despite clear signage indicating the need for contact precautions. The nursing assistant also entered another resident's room without performing hand hygiene in between. During interviews, the nursing assistant stated she was unaware of the contact precautions and misunderstood the requirements, believing PPE was only necessary when directly touching the resident. Further interviews with a certified medication technician and an LPN revealed similar gaps in knowledge, with both staff members unable to correctly describe when PPE should be used for residents on contact precautions. The Assistant Director of Nursing Services and Infection Preventionist confirmed that these staff members had completed infection control competencies but could not provide evidence that they demonstrated the necessary knowledge or skills for caring for residents on contact precautions. The deficiency was identified for three out of four nursing staff interviewed regarding contact precautions.
Failure to Maintain Safe Environment and Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified due to the failure to ensure that a nursing home area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. The report notes that the environment did not meet safety standards, and there was insufficient oversight to protect residents from potential accidents. This lack of proper supervision and the presence of hazards in the area directly contributed to the deficiency cited by surveyors.
Failure to Follow Contact Precautions for Resident with ESBL
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program as required for residents with communicable diseases. Specifically, a resident with a diagnosis of ESBL in the urine had a physician's order for contact precautions, which included the use of gowns and gloves upon entering the resident's room. Surveyor observations revealed that a nursing assistant entered the resident's room on multiple occasions without performing hand hygiene and without donning the required gown and gloves, despite clear signage on the door indicating the need for contact precautions. The nursing assistant also entered another resident's room and then reentered the room of the resident on contact precautions, again without following proper infection control procedures. Interviews with the nursing assistant revealed a lack of awareness regarding the resident's contact precautions order and a misunderstanding of when to use personal protective equipment (PPE). The assistant director of nursing and the infection preventionist confirmed that the resident was actively being treated for ESBL and that staff were expected to perform hand hygiene and wear gowns and gloves upon entering the room. The failure to adhere to established infection control protocols was directly observed and acknowledged by staff during the survey.
Failure to Ensure Wound Care Services Met Professional Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that wound care services provided to a resident met professional standards of practice, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies in the management and documentation of wound treatments. For a resident with dementia and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, a wound physician recommended a specific treatment regimen for a non-pressure wound on the left anterior shin, including the application of a collagen sheet with calcium alginate and a gauze island dressing twice daily. However, there was no evidence of a physician's order in place for this treatment, and during observation, the dressing applied to the wound was not labeled with the date or initials as required by facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of the required order and proper labeling. Additionally, the same resident had an unstageable pressure wound on the left posterior calf. While there were physician orders for wound care, including the use of Santyl and later a collagen sheet with calcium alginate, record review showed gaps where no treatment order was in place for several shifts. The wound nurse acknowledged that orders from the wound physician are transcribed by nursing staff, but if received after hours, transcription may be delayed until the following day. The nurse also confirmed the lack of a treatment order for the non-pressure wound and the absence of documented treatment for the pressure ulcer on specific dates, as well as the failure to date and initial dressings per policy.
Widespread Sanitation and Maintenance Deficiencies in Resident Bathrooms and Shower Rooms
Penalty
Summary
Surveyor observations, record review, and staff interviews revealed that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents across all three units. Multiple bathrooms and shower rooms were found with significant cleanliness and maintenance issues, including black and pink matter (suspected mold or mildew) in shower stalls, discolored and stained toilet bowls, and persistent strong odors of urine in several resident rooms and bathrooms. In one instance, a resident's room was reported to have an overwhelming urine odor that was not resolved despite a request for deep cleaning. Additionally, a shower stall was found to harbor multiple small flies, and urinals containing urine were left hanging on a resident's bed. Further deficiencies included physical disrepair such as a large hole in a bathroom wall, partially plastered walls with visible holes, and the storage of multiple wheelchairs, recliners, a bed frame, and a small table in a common area. These conditions were observed and acknowledged by facility leadership during the survey. The findings were substantiated by a community complaint and direct surveyor inspection, indicating a pattern of inadequate housekeeping and maintenance practices affecting resident comfort and sanitation.
Significant Medication Error Due to Missed Antibiotic Doses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication errors, specifically regarding the administration of an antibiotic, Bactrim, prescribed for bacteremia. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, bacteremia, and sepsis, and was to continue receiving Bactrim as per hospital discharge instructions. However, due to an incorrect transcription of the medication start date, the resident missed four consecutive doses of Bactrim. The error was not communicated to a provider, and the facility did not utilize available resources, such as substituting the liquid form of Bactrim with tablets from the Pyxis machine, to prevent the missed doses. The resident experienced a change in condition, including severe abdominal pain, increased weakness, difficulty urinating, chills, and abnormal vital signs, leading to a hospital transfer where the resident was treated for urosepsis. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and failure to notify a provider about the missed doses or to explore alternative medication forms. The Director of Nursing Services and the Administrator acknowledged that they expected the resident to receive the medication as ordered or for a provider to be notified if it was not administered.
Failure to Monitor and Document Urinary Output for Residents with Foley Catheters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for two residents with indwelling catheters. Resident ID #1 was admitted with a urinary tract infection, bacteremia, and sepsis, and had a foley catheter in place. The resident accidentally removed the catheter, and although staff were instructed to monitor urinary output, documentation was incomplete and inconsistent. The resident's urinary output was not adequately recorded, and there was no evidence that a provider was notified of the low output until the resident's condition worsened, necessitating a hospital transfer. Resident ID #2, admitted with neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, also had a foley catheter and required monitoring of urinary output. However, the facility failed to document the resident's urinary output on several occasions as ordered. Interviews with staff revealed an expectation for urinary output to be measured and documented, yet this was not consistently done. The Director of Nursing Services did not acknowledge the need to notify a provider about Resident ID #1's low urinary output, indicating a lapse in communication and adherence to care protocols.
Inaccurate Resident Assessments for Tobacco Use and Range of Motion
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate assessments of residents' tobacco use and range of motion, as required by the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual. For four residents reviewed for tobacco use, the facility's records indicated that they were independent smokers, yet their Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments inaccurately coded them as non-users of tobacco products. This discrepancy was identified through a review of progress notes and a facility document titled Quality Review - Smoking Program, which confirmed the residents' tobacco use. The MDS Coordinator admitted to not interviewing residents about their smoking status and could not provide evidence to justify the incorrect coding. Additionally, the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's range of motion. A resident with a left-hand contracture was documented in their care plan, but their MDS assessment inaccurately indicated no impairments to their range of motion. During interviews, both the MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nursing Services were unable to provide evidence that the MDS assessments for the residents in question were completed accurately, highlighting a failure in the facility's assessment processes.
Infection Control and Equipment Maintenance Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies observed during the survey. Two residents with Multi-drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) were not placed on Contact or Enhanced Barrier Precautions as required by the facility's policy and CDC guidelines. Resident ID #17, diagnosed with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), and Resident ID #86, diagnosed with MRSA and Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), were not observed to be on the necessary precautions during the survey dates. Additionally, there was no evidence that Resident ID #86 was retested for MRSA or ESBL before removing the precautions. Another deficiency was noted with Resident ID #38, who had a gastrostomy tube and required Enhanced Barrier Precautions. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed administering medications via the feeding tube without wearing a gown, despite signage indicating the need for gown use during such procedures. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) confirmed that the nurse should have worn a gown during the medication administration. Further deficiencies were identified in the storage of humidified oxygen for two residents, ID #45 and ID #58, where the oxygen humidifier containers were placed on the floor instead of the shelf of the oxygen concentrator. Additionally, Resident ID #11's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machine was not cleaned according to the facility's policy, and the filter was missing. The LPN admitted to documenting the cleaning without actually performing it, and the DNS could not provide evidence of the BiPAP's cleaning as per the policy.
Failure to Position Resident Upright During Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for a resident who required assistance with meals. The resident, admitted in October 2021, had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, and contractures of both hands. The care plan, last revised in August 2022, indicated the resident had a nutritional problem related to obesity and required physical assistance for meals and fluids. A physician's order from July 2022 specified that the resident should receive one-to-one assistance with feeding and be positioned upright at 90 degrees during meals. Surveyor observations revealed that the resident was not positioned upright at 90 degrees during meals on multiple occasions. Specifically, the resident was not properly positioned during meals observed on July 17 and July 18, 2024. Interviews with staff, including a Nursing Assistant and an LPN, confirmed the failure to adhere to the physician's order. The Director of Nursing Services was unable to provide evidence that the resident was positioned correctly during mealtimes as required by the physician's order.
Failure to Monitor Urinary Output for Resident with Foley Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident with an indwelling foley catheter. The resident, who was readmitted to the facility with acute heart failure and obstructive uropathy, required monitoring of urinary output as part of their care plan. Despite this requirement, the facility did not measure and record the resident's urinary output consistently, with 46 out of 51 opportunities missed between July 1, 2024, and July 17, 2024. The Director of Nursing Services confirmed during an interview that it was expected for urinary output to be documented every shift for residents with a foley catheter. However, the facility was unable to provide evidence of such documentation, indicating a failure to monitor and assess the resident's renal function adequately. This deficiency was identified during a surveyor's review of the resident's records and interviews with facility staff.
Failure to Ensure Proper G-Tube Placement Check
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving nutrition and medications via a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications. The deficiency was identified during a surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview. The facility's policy on Enteral Tube Medication Administration, dated December 2019, requires checking for proper tube placement using air and auscultation and checking gastric content for resident feeding. A physician's order dated July 21, 2023, also mandated checking g-tube placement every shift before and after any feeds and before and after any medication administration. During a medication administration task observed by a surveyor on July 18, 2024, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), identified as Staff A, was seen disconnecting the resident's feeding, administering medications, and reconnecting the tube feeding without checking for proper g-tube placement. Staff A acknowledged during an interview that she did not check for proper g-tube placement at any time during the medication administration task and did not follow the physician's order. The Director of Nursing Services was unable to provide evidence that the resident received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications related to checking for placement of the tube prior to medication administration.
Medication Administration Errors via G-Tube
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that each resident's medication regimen was free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. During a survey, it was observed that there were 5 errors out of 30 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 16.67%. The errors were specifically related to the administration of enteral medications via a gastrostomy tube (g-tube). The facility's policy on enteral tube medication administration requires that each medication be administered separately and that the tubing be flushed between each medication. Additionally, medications should be allowed to flow by gravity. During the survey, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), identified as Staff A, was observed crushing and mixing all prescribed medications together and administering them via a g-tube using a piston syringe, contrary to the facility's policy. The medications included Nortriptyline, Cyanocobalamin, Cholecalciferol, Folic Acid, and Metoprolol Tartrate. Staff A acknowledged during an interview that she did not administer each medication separately, did not flush the tubing between medications, and did not allow the medication to flow by gravity. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) confirmed that the expected procedure was not followed and could not provide evidence that the facility ensured a medication error rate below 5% for each resident.
Failure to Accommodate Resident's Food Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate a resident's food preferences, as observed by surveyors. The resident, who was admitted in October 2021 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, and contractures of both hands, had a care plan indicating a nutritional problem related to obesity and required staff assistance for meals. The care plan included an intervention to identify and honor food preferences. A progress note from the Registered Dietitian dated July 18, 2024, stated that the resident preferred soft salad sandwiches for lunch and dinner, which was noted on the resident's tray ticket. However, during surveyor observations, it was found that the resident did not receive the preferred sandwich on two consecutive days. On July 17, 2024, the sandwich was crossed off the tray ticket, and on July 18, 2024, the sandwich was listed but not provided. Interviews with staff confirmed the oversight, with a Licensed Practical Nurse unable to explain the omission and a Nursing Assistant continuing to feed the resident chicken despite the resident's expressed preference for a sandwich. The Registered Dietitian confirmed that sandwiches were available and should have been provided, and the Administrator could not provide evidence that the resident received meals according to their preference.
Failure to Provide Prescribed Behavioral Health Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to a resident, as required to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The resident, admitted in March 2023, had diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A psychiatric evaluation on March 26, 2024, recommended increasing buspirone to 15 mg twice daily and adding hydroxyzine 25 mg as needed for anxiety. However, the physician's order was incorrectly transcribed, resulting in the resident receiving buspirone only once daily and hydroxyzine for just one day. This error was not identified or corrected, leading to the resident not receiving the prescribed treatment. The resident's mental health condition deteriorated, as evidenced by increasing scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), indicating worsening depression. Progress notes documented ongoing anxiety and depressive symptoms, including difficulty sleeping, anxiety related to medical procedures, and requests for psychiatric support. Despite these documented needs, the facility did not ensure the resident received the prescribed medications. Interviews with the Director of Nursing Services and the psychiatric provider revealed a lack of awareness and oversight regarding the medication errors, contributing to the deficiency in care.
Failure to Notify Physician and Unauthorized Implementation of Hospice Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet professional standards of practice by not notifying the physician of a change in condition and implementing hospice recommendations without physician approval for a hospice resident. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance, was found to have bruises on the genital area and inner thigh. Despite the facility's policy requiring physician notification for changes in condition, the physician was not informed of the bruising or the hospice recommendations. The hospice nurse recommended holding the anticoagulant medication and administering morphine, but these actions were taken without physician authorization. The resident had a history of dementia with behavioral disturbance, thrombophilia, anxiety disorder, and hypertension, and was on Rivaroxaban, an anticoagulant. The nurse on duty did not notify the physician of the bruising or the hospice recommendations, and entered these recommendations as orders in the electronic medical record without provider authorization. The Nurse Practitioner and Director of Nursing Services confirmed that the provider should have been notified of the resident's condition and the hospice recommendations before they were implemented.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 727 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 23 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Pawtucket
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adviniacare Summit Commons, Llc | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 2 |
| Jeanne Jugan Residence | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Mansion Nursing And Rehab Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Pawtucket Falls Healthcare Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Harris Health Care Center North | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Adviniacare Pawtucket Pleasant Rehab Center, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.