Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Wesley Enhanced Living - Doylestown during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Unsanitary food handling and improper food storage were observed in the dietary area, an activities kitchenette, and on N2. A dietary employee handled food with gloved hands, touched equipment, and continued food prep without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene between tasks. Surveyors also found unlabeled and undated food items, debris on shelving, and multiple expired items in the kitchenette cabinets, which the NHA confirmed should have been labeled, dated, cleaned, or discarded.
Delayed Call Bell Response Times: Staff did not answer call bells in a timely manner for five residents with significant care needs, including HF, femur fractures, Parkinson's disease, CKD, diabetes, obesity, anxiety, and a hx of stroke. Residents reported long waits for assistance, and the call bell log showed 65 incidents where response times exceeded 19 minutes, including waits of 25 to 36 minutes. The NHA confirmed the log accurately reflected response times and that the waits exceeded the expected 15-minute response time.
A resident with hypotension and Parkinson’s disease had orders for midodrine with instructions to hold the medication when SBP was above 140 mm/Hg. MAR review showed the medication was administered outside those parameters multiple times, including after the dose was reduced, and the DON confirmed the orders were not followed.
Failure to provide adaptive eating equipment: A resident with Parkinson's Disease was ordered to use weighted utensils to support self-feeding, and the care plan and MD order directed staff to have the adaptive equipment in place. However, staff observed the resident eating meals with regular utensils instead of the weighted fork and spoon, and the resident stated she was having difficulty using her utensils. The DON confirmed the equipment should have been in place.
A facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions before administering as-needed pain medication to a resident with chronic pain. Despite the care plan's inclusion of comfort measures, the resident received oxycodone multiple times without documented evidence of these interventions. The DON confirmed the lack of documentation.
Unsanitary food handling and improper storage of expired and unlabeled food items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department, the activities room kitchenette, and on Nursing Unit N2. Facility policy on bare hand contact with food and use of single-use gloves required staff to change gloves as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination, prevent cross contamination when changing tasks, and change gloves any time a contaminated surface was touched. During observation of meal service in the satellite kitchen on N2, a dietary employee handled and cut grilled sandwiches with gloved hands, touched the handle of the grill/oven, and then handled the sandwiches again without changing gloves. The same employee also prepared bread with peanut butter, walked to another station to retrieve jelly, and returned to the sandwich preparation without changing gloves. The dining services manager confirmed the employee should have changed gloves and performed hand hygiene between tasks. Facility policy on foods brought by family or visitors required food to be labeled and stored to distinguish it from facility-prepared food and required staff to discard food past its expiration date. In the activities room kitchenette refrigerator, surveyors observed an opened bottle of salad dressing that was not labeled and shelving with debris and a dried light-yellow substance. In the kitchenette cabinets, surveyors found multiple unlabeled or undated items, including a bottle of cinnamon sticks with an expiration date of December 29, 2020, ground nutmeg with an expiration date of December 27, 2024, a thick yellow substance in a bottle that was not labeled or dated, a paper bowl with a lid containing a powdered substance that was not labeled or dated, cream of tartar with an expiration date of November 20, 2024, a can of pumpkin puree with an expiration date of December 29, 2025, and several packets of thickening powder with expiration dates of November 3, 2025, April 10, 2025, October 11, 2024, and March 9, 2023. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the items should have been labeled and dated, the shelving should have been clean, and the expired items should have been discarded.
Delayed Call Bell Response Times
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to answer call bells in a timely manner for five sampled residents, affecting their dignity, self-determination, communication, and ability to exercise their rights. Resident 3 had heart failure and debility and was assessed as able to communicate needs to staff and needing assistance with activities of daily living, including toileting and dressing. Resident 6 had a recent femur fracture, difficulty walking, and obesity and also required staff assistance with toileting and dressing. Resident 8 had heart failure, a history of stroke, difficulty walking, and anxiety and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Resident 21 had a recent femur fracture, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Resident 32 had Parkinson's disease and hypotension and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The residents stated in interviews that staff took a long time to answer call bells. Review of the facility's Status Solutions over 15 minutes Report showed 65 incidents from February 3 through March 3, 2026, when call bell response times exceeded 19 minutes for these residents. Examples included Resident 3 waiting 36 minutes and 30 minutes, Resident 6 waiting 29 minutes and 31 minutes, Resident 21 waiting 28 minutes and 27 minutes, and Resident 32 waiting 25 minutes and 27 minutes. During interview, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the report accurately measured call bell response times and that these residents waited longer than the expected 15-minute response time for assistance.
Failure to Follow Blood Pressure Hold Parameters for Midodrine
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a physician’s orders for Resident 32, who had diagnoses including hypotension and Parkinson’s disease. A physician ordered midodrine 5 mg three times daily with instructions not to administer it if the resident’s systolic blood pressure was higher than 140 mm/Hg, but review of the MAR showed the medication was given three times in December 2025 and twice in January 2026 when the resident’s SBP was above that limit. After the dose was reduced to 2.5 mg three times daily with the same blood pressure hold parameter, the MAR showed the medication was again administered twice in February 2026 when the resident’s SBP was higher than 140 mm/Hg. During an interview, the DON confirmed the physician’s orders for Resident 32 were not followed and the medication was administered outside the ordered parameters.
Failure to Provide Adaptive Eating Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that adaptive eating equipment was provided to Resident 4, who had a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. Occupational therapy documentation dated August 25, 2025, indicated the resident was to use weighted utensils with meals to increase independence with self-feeding, and the care plan directed use of a weighted fork and spoon at all meals. A physician order dated April 8, 2025, also directed staff to have adaptive equipment in place according to the resident's care plan. However, during observation on March 4, 2026, the resident was eating lunch in the dining room with regular, non-weighted utensils. On March 5, 2026, the resident was again observed eating breakfast in her room without weighted utensils, using regular utensils while scrambled eggs had fallen onto the floor. During that observation, the resident stated that she was having difficulty using her utensils. The DON later confirmed that the adaptive equipment should have been in place as indicated in the care plan.
Failure to Attempt Non-Pharmacological Pain Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain before administering prescribed as-needed pain medication for a resident. Resident 8, who had diagnoses including dementia, fibromyalgia, and diabetes, was ordered by a physician to receive oxycodone every four hours as needed for severe, chronic pain. The resident's care plan included interventions such as providing comfort measures with positioning and controlling noise levels. However, a review of Medication Administration Records showed that the resident received oxycodone without documented evidence of attempted non-pharmacological interventions 62 times in January 2025 and 39 times in February 2025. In an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation supporting the provision of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering the as-needed pain medication.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,364 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 18 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Doylestown
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr | 0.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Harborview Rehabilitation Care Center At Doylestow | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 1 |
| Heritage Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Pine Run Health Center | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Neshaminy Manor Home | 3.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Wesley Enhanced Living - Doylestown.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.