Sunset Ridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment by not maintaining comfortable ambient temperatures in the dining room, which was used by residents for dining and activities throughout the day and into the evening. Resident council meeting minutes dated December 9, 2025, showed that residents in attendance complained the dining room was cold. During a resident group interview on January 22, 2026, Residents 25, 60, 69, and 76 each stated that the dining room was cold or chilly, and that the temperature made the area uncomfortable for eating and activities. One resident reported leaving the dining room because it was too cold, another said he had been raising the concern for weeks without resolution, and others said they wore extra clothing or wanted a sweater to feel warmer. Observations in the dining room on January 22, 2026, showed the room felt cool during both the 10:30 AM group interview and later observations. The Director of Maintenance measured wall temperatures of 69.7 F, 69.4 F, 65.6 F, and 68.0 F at 11:02 AM, and later 70.3 F, 66.4 F, 68.7 F, and 71.1 F at 12:37 PM, while the thermostat was set to heat the room to 73 F and the wall thermostat gauge indicated 70 F. The Director of Maintenance stated the dining room heating system was old and could not raise the room temperature higher on cold days. During review with the NHA, there was no documented evidence that resident concerns about the cold dining room had been addressed or that alternative measures were taken to ensure resident comfort. The facility did not maintain the required temperature range of 71 F to 81 F.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide person-centered care and failed to follow professional standards of practice for diabetes management for one resident with diabetes and dementia. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes and dementia, and the quarterly MDS dated December 23, 2025, showed severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 03. A laboratory report dated December 4, 2025, showed a HgbA1c of 12.9% with an average blood glucose of 324 mg/dL, reflecting poor blood sugar control over the prior two to three months. Physician orders showed multiple changes in diabetes treatment, including Lantus, Jardiance, and Novolog adjustments between December 1 and December 15, 2025, but no blood glucose monitoring was ordered despite the medication increases. The last documented blood glucose reading was on December 8, 2025, and no subsequent monitoring was documented. The care plan dated December 30, 2025, stated the resident used insulin glargine, insulin aspart, and Jardiance, with interventions to obtain blood glucose readings and report abnormal values as ordered, but the DON stated the review did not reveal evidence of a documented person-centered care plan addressing blood glucose monitoring and individualized diabetes management. An LPN stated the resident was not currently on blood glucose monitoring despite receiving insulin multiple times daily, and noted this could be related to finger pain, but there was no documented evidence of such complaints or an alternative monitoring plan.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accommodate resident food preferences, specifically repeated requests for soup, to the extent possible for residents 4, 25, 33, 60, 69, and 76. Resident group meeting minutes showed that residents had raised concerns about wanting more soup on the menu, and multiple residents later stated in interviews that they had been asking for soup for months to over a year without resolution. Resident 4 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and stated that soup would be nice and that the request had come up in food committee meetings but was never resolved. Resident 33 was severely cognitively impaired, and the resident representative reported that soup had been discussed with kitchen and management without resolution, and that soup was often brought in from outside for the resident. During the resident group interview, residents reported wanting specific soup options such as vegetable soup, tomato soup, and chicken noodle soup, and stated that soup had not been served for a long time. Review of the facility menu for weeks 1 through 5 showed no soup on the rotation, and the always-available food list also did not include soup. The registered dietician confirmed residents had requested soup in the past but could not provide documentation that the requests were incorporated into the menu or always-available options. The foodservice director confirmed corporate-level menu planning, acknowledged awareness of the residents’ requests, and stated that menus had not yet been adjusted and soup was not offered as an alternate menu choice. The nursing home administrator was unable to provide documentation that efforts were made to accommodate these food preferences.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure a resident’s right to privacy and failed to prevent intrusion by another resident during personal care for one of 21 residents sampled. Resident 37 was admitted with muscular dystrophy, was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, and required extensive staff assistance with showers, moving in bed, dressing, bathing, and toileting because of progressive weakness and inability to move extremities. Resident 29 was admitted with vascular dementia and had impaired short-term and long-term memory, severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making, and fluctuating attention and distractibility. A grievance filed with the facility stated that Resident 29 entered Resident 37’s room during care, including when Resident 37 was receiving a bed bath and when she was on the bedpan, leaving her upset, angry, and embarrassed. Resident 37 later reported that Resident 29 continued to enter her room and the shower room, sometimes multiple times a day, and that staff told her there was nothing they could do. Staff interviews confirmed that Resident 29 wandered throughout the facility, needed redirection multiple times a day, and still entered Resident 37’s room despite attempts to use alarms and stop signs. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the concerns but was unable to provide evidence that Resident 37’s privacy during personal care was ensured or that the grievance resulted in documented sustained corrective action.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to fully implement its abuse prohibition procedures and did not ensure a criminal history record check was requested or obtained before employing one LPN. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program stated that administration would conduct employee background checks and would not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. A review of personnel records showed the LPN began working at the facility before a Pennsylvania State Police Response for Criminal Record Check had been completed, with the request date documented several months after the employee’s start date. During interviews, HR confirmed the LPN worked at the facility without the criminal record check completed, and the NHA was unable to provide evidence that the facility had screened the employee to verify she had not been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law before working with residents.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that reflected Resident 7’s current medical status and required interventions. Resident 7 was admitted with diagnoses including COPD, had a subdural hemorrhage after a fall, and later developed a DVT in the left leg. A quarterly MDS dated December 28, 2025, showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 07. Physician orders included continuous oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula and Eliquis 5 mg every 12 hours for DVT. A review of the resident’s comprehensive plan of care, which was initiated on December 4, 2024 and most recently revised on December 30, 2025, showed it did not include updated goals, interventions, or monitoring related to the resident’s continuous oxygen therapy or anticoagulant therapy for DVT. During an interview on January 22, 2026, the DON confirmed the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to accurately reflect the resident’s current medical condition, risks, and required treatments.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure Resident 15’s environment was free from potential accident hazards when two clear 30-milliliter plastic cups containing a white, thick substance were observed on the windowsill in the resident’s room, with one cup containing a wooden tongue depressor immersed in the substance. Resident 15 was resting in bed at the time of the observation and was unaware of the cups or their purpose when interviewed. The RNAC entered the room during the observation and removed the cups from the windowsill. Resident 15 was admitted with diagnoses including acute kidney failure and had a BIMS score of 9 on the quarterly MDS, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Resident 15 had been assessed or determined safe and appropriate to self-administer medications or treatments. The RNAC identified the substance as cream used for the resident’s skin to prevent skin breakdown, and the physician order for preventive skin care remained active and indefinite. The DON and NHA confirmed there was no documented evidence that the resident had been assessed and determined safe and appropriate to self-administer medications and treatments.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documented a clinical rationale for declining a consultant pharmacist’s recommendation to reduce Duloxetine for one resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including diastolic congestive heart failure, dysphagia, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and was receiving Duloxetine 30 mg daily for depression. A consultant pharmacist’s December 12, 2025 review recommended considering a gradual dose reduction (GDR) to maintain the lowest possible dose. The physician’s response dated December 15, 2025 declined the GDR recommendation and deferred the decision to psychiatry, stating the medication was also used for pain management, but did not include a clinical assessment, monitoring plan, or risk-benefit analysis explaining why the GDR was not appropriate. A psychiatric evaluation dated December 17, 2025 documented that the resident had no mood or behavioral concerns, described mood as good, and noted stable sleep and appetite, with the resident denying depression, anxiety, mood swings, irritability, lack of motivation, and feelings of hopelessness or worthlessness. The nurse practitioner’s evaluation also did not acknowledge the pharmacist’s recommendation or provide a clinical justification for continuing Duloxetine at the same dose.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure Resident 52’s medication regimen was free from unnecessary drugs and failed to document that nonpharmacological interventions were attempted before starting Depakote for mood disorder. Resident 52 was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and depression, and a quarterly MDS dated September 29, 2025, showed moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 9, a mood disorder score of 6, and no behavioral symptoms during the 7-day look-back period. Clinical notes documented intermittent behavioral concerns, including the resident removing an alarm and walking around the dining room rearranging furniture, and later increasingly aggressive behaviors toward staff and peers with difficulty redirecting the resident. However, the note describing aggression did not specify the behaviors. A psychiatric consultation on October 1, 2025, found the resident calm and cooperative, noted a history of adjustment disorder with depressed mood and insomnia, and recorded staff reports of increased behaviors, agitation, and recent verbal aggression toward staff and other residents. The psychiatrist recommended Depakote 125 mg by mouth twice daily for mood disorder, and the physician agreed. The resident’s consent form documented verbal consent from the resident representative for Depakote to improve functional ability and reduce behaviors, and the medication was ordered on October 12, 2025. The care plan listed interventions such as offering a stuffed bear or cat, conversation and one-on-one interaction, changing the environment, and offering food and fluids when behaviors occurred. The record did not show individualized nonpharmacological interventions were implemented and evaluated before Depakote was initiated, nor did it show that behavioral triggers were identified or that alternative approaches were attempted and found ineffective before starting the medication.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles and stored properly in the medication storage area. A review of facility policy showed that when a multi-dose container is opened, the date opened must be recorded on the container, and medications must be stored according to manufacturer recommendations with proper sanitation, temperature, light, moisture control, segregation, and security. During an observation of the East wing medication room, two multi-dose vials of Aplisol in the medication refrigerator were found opened and available for use but not dated when initially opened. The manufacturer’s instructions reviewed by surveyors stated that vials in use for more than 30 days should be discarded. An LPN present during the observation confirmed the Aplisol had been opened and not dated, and that the medications should have been removed from the refrigerator and discarded. The DON later confirmed that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling practices for multi-dose medications.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain the fire alarm system for the entire building, as evidenced by the annual fire alarm system testing documentation from January 13, 2025. The documentation revealed that the fire alarm system did not automatically transmit the alarm to notify emergency forces in the event of a fire. This deficiency was observed during a survey on March 17, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., and it was confirmed during an exit conference with the Facility Administrator and Facilities Director at 11:30 a.m. on the same day that the issue still persisted.

Plan Of Correction

1. The fire alarm system will transmit the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in the event of a fire. 2. The facility has an agreement in place for the work to be completed. 3. The fire alarm system will be audited to ensure ongoing compliance. Audits will be completed by the Maintenance Director/Designee. 4. Audits will be reviewed at the facility's Q.A.P.I. meeting for review and recommendation.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain proper enclosures for three hazardous areas, affecting two of three smoke compartments. During an observation on March 17, 2025, it was noted that the door to the Clean Laundry area required adjustment to ensure it positively latched into the frame. Similarly, the door to the Medical Records area also needed adjustment for proper latching. Additionally, the door to the Oxygen Storage room in the East Wing was found not to be smoke-tight when latched into the frame, located at the nurses' station. These deficiencies were confirmed during an exit conference with the Facility Administrator and Facilities Director.

Plan Of Correction

1. The Clean Laundry, Medical Records, and East Wing Oxygen Storage room doors have been adjusted to be smoke tight and latch into the frame. 2. The Maintenance Director/Designee will check doors in the facility to ensure they are smoke tight and latch into the frame. 3. Facility doors will be randomly audited to ensure ongoing compliance. Audits will be completed by the Maintenance Director/Designee. 4. Audits will be reviewed at the facilities Q.A.P.I. meeting for review and recommendation.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain the automatic sprinkler system, as evidenced by observations and interviews conducted during a survey. On March 17, 2025, between 10:12 a.m. and 10:20 a.m., it was observed that the West Wing had an unsealed penetration of a corridor ceiling tile near Resident Room 109, and the Med room at the Nurses' station had an unsealed penetration of the wall around two blue IT cables. Further observations between 10:39 a.m. and 10:55 a.m. revealed that the Medical Records area had two sprinkler escutcheons that had been painted over, and the East Wing Med room at the Nurses' station also had a painted-over sprinkler escutcheon. These deficiencies were confirmed during an exit conference with the Facility Administrator and Facilities Director.

Plan Of Correction

1. The ceiling tile on West Wing has been replaced. The Medication rooms IT cables have been sealed. The paint has been removed from the escutcheons in the Medical Records room. 2. The Maintenance Director/Designee will check area of the facility to ensure smoke compartments are sealed. 3. Audits of smoke compartments will be audited to ensure ongoing compliance of the automatic sprinkler system. 4. Audits will be reviewed at the facilities Q.A.P.I. meeting for review and recommendation.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the planned menu was sufficiently reviewed and updated to provide variety and avoid repetitive meal selections, as required by §483.60(c). During a Resident Council meeting, multiple residents expressed concerns about the lack of variety in the menu, noting that the same meats were served for consecutive meals. The Resident Council President mentioned that these concerns had been raised in food committee meetings with the Certified Dietary Manager but were not addressed, as the facility's menu was provided by a contracted vendor and reportedly could not be modified. A review of the Fall/Winter 2024-2025 menu revealed multiple instances of repetitive meal patterns over the 4-week cycle, with similar meats being served for consecutive meals. Interviews with the facility's contracted dietary food/menu representative and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility's menu was repetitive and did not offer variety, leading to menu fatigue and reduced meal satisfaction among residents. The facility's failure to review and modify the planned menus resulted in repetitive meal patterns that did not meet the satisfaction of the residents.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct the menu schedule as observed during survey. Current menu will be reviewed, altered, and updated to reflect variety to assist in deterring menu fatigue and increasing menu satisfaction. Certified dietary manager, Registered Dietician and kitchen staff will be re-educated on meal rotation/variety. Audits will be completed on resident satisfaction of meal variety weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Audit findings will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting, resident council and food committee.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the dietary department, as observed during an inspection. In the cook's area, a metal wire rack used for storing clean cooking equipment was found to be greasy with a significant buildup of debris, indicating inadequate cleaning practices. Additionally, the windowsill above the microwave and open bread loaves was cluttered and covered in dust and debris, posing a potential source of contamination. A storage container of butter was improperly handled, with a dirty, uncovered butter spreader resting on it, and the butter itself was discolored, had crumbs adhered to its surface, and appeared soft and melting. Further observations revealed that the interior of the microwave contained food splatter and peeling surfaces, which could lead to cross-contamination. A food prep station had an industrial can opener with a sticky blade, which had been used earlier to open cans of tuna fish and had not been cleaned afterward, failing to meet sanitary standards for food preparation equipment. These findings were confirmed with the facility's Nursing Home Administrator, highlighting the need for maintaining the dietary department in a sanitary manner to prevent potential food contamination and foodborne illness.

Plan Of Correction

Areas of concern noted during tour on 3/11/25 were cleaned/corrected that same day, 3/11/25. New microwave has been purchased to replace the current microwave noted as a concern during survey. Food prep, storage and hard surface areas will be placed on a routine cleaning schedule to prevent food contamination and food-borne illness. CDM and kitchen staff will be re-educated on new routine cleaning schedules. Audits of food prep, storage and hard surface areas will be completed by NHA/designee weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive infection prevention and control program as required by regulations. A review of the facility's policies and infection control logs revealed significant deficiencies in the program's execution. The facility's policy on 'Infection Prevention and Control Program' outlined the need to identify, investigate, control, and prevent infections, but the actual practice did not align with these objectives. Specifically, the facility lacked an effective system to analyze infection clusters, track changes in prevalent organisms, or identify increases in infection rates in a timely manner. Further investigation into the facility's infection control logs from May 2024 through March 2025 showed that there was no tracking of infections for June 2024. Additionally, the logs were incomplete, missing critical infection-related details such as the location of infections, whether they were community-acquired or facility-acquired, symptoms experienced by residents, and the onset date of infections. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing, who also serves as the facility's Infection Preventionist, confirmed the absence of a tracking log for June 2024 and acknowledged the incompleteness of the logs, indicating a failure to support a comprehensive infection prevention and control program.

Plan Of Correction

Facility logs for June 2024 were located and are present in the facility. Current system utilized for infection prevention and control will be reviewed. Processes not meeting policy guidelines will be updated and implemented. Nursing staff will be re-educated on facility infection prevention and control program and policies. Audits will be completed on new infections to determine that criteria in facility policies have been followed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results will be reviewed in monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an effective system for monitoring antibiotic usage as part of its antibiotic stewardship program. This deficiency was identified during a survey, which revealed that the facility did not adhere to its own policies regarding antibiotic prescribing and monitoring. Specifically, the facility's policy required that antibiotics be prescribed based on clinical indications of active infection or suspected sepsis, and that antibiotic usage and outcomes be documented and reviewed by the infection preventionist. However, the facility did not provide evidence that prescribing practitioners were informed of their prescribing practices, nor did it demonstrate actions to optimize infection treatment through improved antibiotic prescribing and management. The deficiency involved a resident who was admitted with a history of malignant neoplasm of the bladder and dementia. Despite having an elevated white blood cell count, the resident showed no other symptoms justifying antibiotic use. Nevertheless, a physician ordered a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity, and subsequently prescribed Bactrim DS before the culture results were available. The culture later confirmed the presence of an antibiotic-resistant strain of E. coli, rendering the prescribed antibiotic ineffective. The resident received five doses of the unnecessary antibiotic, highlighting a failure in the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing during an interview.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct the administration of antibiotic to resident 1. Current residents on antibiotic therapy for a UTI will be reviewed to determine antibiotic necessity and verification of MD notification. Nursing staff and in-house physicians will be re-educated on antibiotic stewardship policy. Audits will be completed on residents who are ordered a UA C&S to determine the necessity of antibiotic and verification of MD notification weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Findings will be reviewed in monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Sunset Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing Center was found to be non-compliant with federal and state regulations due to inadequate safety measures and supervision for a resident identified as high risk for falls. The facility failed to implement effective fall prevention interventions, resulting in multiple recurrent falls for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of impulsiveness and poor safety awareness. Despite being identified as high risk for falls, the resident experienced 14 falls over a period of several months, many of which were unwitnessed. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including dysphagia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, repeated falls, hypertensive heart disease, and urinary tract infection, continued to fall in various locations such as their room, bathrooms, and common areas. The facility's documentation revealed a lack of consistent implementation of planned interventions, such as frequent visual checks, which were added to the resident's care plan but not consistently conducted. The resident's falls resulted in injuries, including abrasions, hematomas, and a head wound, and were often associated with attempts to self-transfer or use the bathroom. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing, confirmed the failure to provide adequate supervision and follow through with planned interventions. The facility's inaction and lack of effective supervision contributed to the resident's recurrent falls and injuries, highlighting a significant deficiency in meeting the required standards for resident safety and care.

Plan Of Correction

Resident 50 frequent visual checks evaluated and removed from tasks and care plan. Fall interventions reviewed and verified as effective. Facility will continue to implement interventions to assist with prevention of recurrence of falls/injury. Current residents care plans will be reviewed to verify presence of safety interventions to assist in the prevention of falls. Nursing staff will be re-educated on the implementation of effective fall prevention interventions. Audits will be completed on fall incident reports weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months to ensure the implementation of fall prevention interventions. Results will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate pain management for two residents, as evidenced by the lack of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering narcotic pain medication for one resident and the failure to implement appropriate interventions for another resident's continued pain. Resident 60, admitted with multiple rib fractures, had physician orders for as-needed Oxycodone. However, in January 2025, staff administered the medication 30 times, with 23 instances lacking documented evidence of non-pharmacological interventions. Similar patterns were observed in February and March 2025. Interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the inconsistency in attempting non-pharmacological interventions before administering narcotic pain medication. Resident 15, admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema, had a care plan for pain related to arthritis, which included non-pharmacological interventions such as repositioning and therapy evaluation. Despite complaints of pain and a new diagnosis of lumbar vertebrae compression fractures, there was no documented evidence that the resident was offered as-needed acetaminophen or other alternative pain-relief interventions. The Director of Nursing confirmed the facility's failure to develop and implement appropriate pain management interventions for Resident 15's continued pain.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct the nonpharmacological intervention documentation presence prior to as needed oxycodone administration for resident 60 for 1/13/25-1/26/25 and 2/13/25. All other administrations have nonpharmacological interventions documented in the Medication Administration Record. Resident 15 has remained free of verbal/nonverbal complaints of pain since 1/13/25, with dates of pain documented only on 1/12-1/13/25. Facility will assess current residents with as needed pain medications to verify presence of nonpharmacological intervention(s) documentation prompt prior to medication administration in the medical record and administer as needed/indicated. Nursing staff will be re-educated on documentation and implementation of nonpharmacological intervention(s) prior to medication administration. Audits will be done on new admissions with as needed pain medication to ensure presence of nonpharmacological intervention(s) documentation prior to medication administration in the MAR weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement an effective individualized person-centered care plan for a resident diagnosed with dementia, who exhibited behavioral symptoms such as agitation, aggression, and delusional ideation. The resident, admitted with dementia and agitation, displayed recurrent episodes of increased agitation, aggressive and argumentative behaviors, verbal threats, and delusional beliefs, including thinking another resident was her daughter and that staff had taken her daughter. These behaviors were documented in multiple progress notes over several months, indicating a pattern of distress and confusion. Despite these documented behaviors, the resident's care plan did not identify specific behavioral symptoms or include individualized interventions tailored to address each behavior. The care plan also failed to incorporate the resident's preferences, social and past life history, customary routines, and interests to support behavior management. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the absence of an individualized, person-centered care plan to manage the resident's dementia-related behaviors, leading to the deficiency finding.

Plan Of Correction

Resident 10 care plan has been updated to reflect specific behavioral symptoms, interventions, resident preferences and interests. Residents with dementia diagnosis will be audited to ensure the presence of personalized interventions related to resident specific behaviors. Nursing staff will be re-educated on resident specific care plans and behaviors related to dementia. Audits will be completed on new admissions with diagnosis of dementia to ensure the presence of resident specific behaviors and interventions in the care plan weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services by not maintaining a system of records for the receipt and disposition of controlled drugs, which is necessary for accurate accounting and to prevent possible diversion. This deficiency was identified during a review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews. Specifically, the facility's policy on Discharge Medications requires that controlled substances not be released upon discharge unless permitted by state law and authorized by the resident's attending physician. Additionally, the policy mandates that a nurse reconcile pre-discharge medications with post-discharge medications and document the reconciliation, including a detailed medication disposition record. In the case of Resident 62, who was admitted with acute cystitis and weakness, there was a failure to document the accountability record for controlled medications, including Oxycodone and Tramadol, upon the resident's discharge against medical advice. The nursing note indicated that the resident signed out against medical advice, and while the attending physician and Nursing Home Administrator were notified, there was no documented evidence of a controlled medication accountability record. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of this documentation, which is required by facility policy to prevent unauthorized use and ensure accurate tracking and disposition of controlled medications.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct the absence of the medication disposition on resident 62. Residents discharged home in the last 30 days will be reviewed to determine the presence of medication disposition form. Nursing staff will be re-educated on completion of the medication disposition form upon discharge home. Audits will be completed on residents discharging home from the facility to ensure the presence of the medication disposition form weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results will be reviewed in monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary antibiotics. A resident, admitted with a history of malignant neoplasm of the bladder and dementia, had an elevated white blood count but no other signs of infection. Despite this, the physician ordered a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity to assess for possible infection. The resident was catheterized to obtain a urine sample, and the results were pending. However, before the culture and sensitivity results were available, the physician prescribed Bactrim DS, an antibiotic, to be administered every 12 hours for five days. The laboratory report later revealed that the urine culture identified Escherichia coli ESBL, which was resistant to the prescribed antibiotic, rendering the treatment ineffective. The resident received five doses of Bactrim DS before the culture and sensitivity results confirmed the medication's ineffectiveness. During an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the administration of Bactrim DS was not clinically justified, as it was ineffective against the identified organism, resulting in the resident receiving an unnecessary medication.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct the ordered administration of the antibiotic to resident 1. Lab culture results will be reviewed on all current residents receiving antibiotic therapy for a UTI to ensure that the ordered antibiotic is clinically justified. Nursing staff will be re-educated on medication necessity related to evidence-based infection control and antimicrobial stewardship practices. Audits will be completed on new antibiotics for UTIs to determine the necessity weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results will be reviewed at the monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for two residents, Resident 8 and Resident 44, as required by professional standards of practice. Resident 8, who was admitted with hypertensive heart disease, was cognitively intact according to a recent assessment. Resident 44, admitted with multiple sclerosis, was severely cognitively impaired. An incident occurred where Resident 44 kissed Resident 8 in the hallway, which was observed by staff. Despite the incident, there was no documentation in Resident 8's clinical record regarding the interaction, staff intervention, or any follow-up assessments to determine potential emotional or psychological effects. Similarly, Resident 44's clinical record lacked documentation of the behavior, assessments following the event, or any interventions to prevent recurrence. This lack of documentation resulted in incomplete and inaccurate clinical records for both residents. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that the nursing staff failed to consistently and accurately document residents' interactions and behaviors in the clinical records. This failure to document significant events and follow-up actions is a deficiency in maintaining accurate and complete clinical records, as required by the regulations.

Plan Of Correction

Medical records were updated on resident 8 and resident 44 to include investigation summary and outcome. Last 3 PB22's will be reviewed to ensure the presence of documentation in the medical record. Nursing staff will be re-educated on maintaining accurate and complete clinical records related to PB 22's. Audits will be completed on new PB22's to verify accurate and complete documentation weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Findings will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure proper coordination of care and services between the long-term care facility and the hospice agency for one resident. This deficiency was identified during a review of clinical records and staff interviews. The resident in question was admitted to the facility with a history of malignant neoplasm of the bladder and dementia, and later admitted into hospice services. However, the care plan for this resident did not reflect the necessary collaboration between the facility and the hospice agency. The resident's care plan, initially dated shortly after admission, lacked documented evidence of collaboration in addressing the resident's daily care needs and specific care and services related to the resident's terminal diagnosis. This indicates a failure to integrate hospice care into the resident's overall care plan, which is essential for ensuring that the resident's needs are met comprehensively. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the resident's care plan was not coordinated with hospice services. This lack of coordination could potentially impact the quality of care provided to the resident, as the care plan did not adequately address the resident's terminal diagnosis and the necessary hospice services.

Plan Of Correction

Resident 1 care plan has been reviewed and updated to reflect the coordination of care and services between the facility and hospice agency. Current residents on hospice will have care plans reviewed to verify the presence of coordination of care and services between the facility and hospice agency. Nursing staff will be re-educated on the need of care plan coordination of care and services between facility and hospice. Audits will be completed on new hospice admissions to ensure the presence of coordination of care and services between facility and hospice in the care plan weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a discharge summary was completed by the physician for one resident. The clinical record review of a resident revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility and later expired and was discharged. However, there was no documented evidence in the resident's clinical record that a discharge summary was completed by the physician upon the resident's death and discharge. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged the absence of the required documentation.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct the presence of a physician discharge summary on resident 63. Residents who discharged in the last 30 days will be reviewed to determine the presence of a physician discharge summary. Nursing staff and physicians will be re-educated on completion of a discharge summary. Audits will be completed on residents who discharge to ensure completion of a discharge summary by the physician weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Findings will be reviewed at monthly QAPI meeting.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to meet the required nurse aide to resident ratios on two specific shifts out of 63 reviewed. On September 4, 2024, during the night shift, the facility had 3.67 nurse aides instead of the required 4.27 for a census of 64 residents. Similarly, on December 29, 2024, during the day shift, the facility had 6.17 nurse aides instead of the required 6.40 for the same census. No additional higher-level staff were available to compensate for these deficiencies, resulting in non-compliance with the staffing regulations effective July 1, 2024, which mandate a minimum of 1 nurse aide per 10 residents during the day, 1 per 11 residents in the evening, and 1 per 15 residents overnight.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct past Nursing Aide ratios. The facility will continue to take measures to adequately provide nurse-aide staff to ensure the needs of the residents are met. Measures will be put in place to adequately provide staff with the required nurse aide to resident ratios. These measures include continuing our retention committee, increased advertising efforts, utilization of agency staff, and sign-on bonuses. The Director of Nursing/designee will continue to educate minimum staffing ratios to RN Supervisors, HR, and the nursing scheduler who are responsible to maintain adequate staffing ratios. The Director of Nursing/designee will audit the daily schedules to ensure that the minimum number of nurse aide staff to resident ratios have been scheduled. The results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility's QAPI meeting for recommendations.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to meet the required licensed practical nurse (LPN) to resident ratio on one occasion during the evening shift. Specifically, on December 25, 2024, the facility's staffing records showed that there were only 2.03 LPNs available, whereas the required number was 2.10 for a census of 63 residents. This deficiency was confirmed through interviews with both the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on March 13, 2025. No additional higher-level staff were available to compensate for this shortfall, leading to a failure in meeting the regulatory staffing requirements.

Plan Of Correction

The facility cannot retroactively correct past LPN ratios. The facility will continue to take measures to adequately provide LPN staff to ensure the needs of the residents are met. Measures will be put in place to adequately provide staff with the required LPN to resident ratios. These measures include continuing our retention committee, increased advertising efforts, utilization of agency staff, and sign-on bonuses. The Director of Nursing/designee will continue to educate minimum staffing ratios to RN Supervisors, HR, and the nursing scheduler who are responsible to maintain adequate staffing ratios. The Director of Nursing/designee will audit the daily schedules to ensure that the minimum number of nurse aide staff to resident ratios have been scheduled. The results of the audits will be reviewed at the facilities QAPI meeting for recommendations.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents, Resident 45 and Resident 42, were free from sexual abuse perpetrated by Resident 6. Resident 45, who was moderately cognitively impaired due to dementia, was touched inappropriately by Resident 6 in the dining room. Despite being aware of Resident 6's history of sexually inappropriate behavior, the facility did not document the incident in Resident 45's clinical record, nor did they fully investigate or report the incident. Staff interviews confirmed that Resident 6's behaviors were a known issue, yet necessary interventions were not implemented to prevent further incidents. Resident 42, who was also moderately cognitively impaired and diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, was another victim of Resident 6's inappropriate behavior. Staff members witnessed Resident 6 groping Resident 42's breasts, but the facility failed to document this incident in Resident 42's clinical record. Similar to the case with Resident 45, the facility did not investigate or report the incident, nor did they take adequate measures to prevent further abuse. Interviews with various staff members, including nurse aides and an LPN, revealed that Resident 6's sexually inappropriate behavior was a recurring issue that was frequently discussed in staff reports. Despite this, the facility did not take sufficient action to protect the residents from abuse. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the facility's failure to ensure the safety of Residents 45 and 42 from sexual abuse by Resident 6.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to timely report incidents of sexual abuse involving two residents, Resident 45 and Resident 42, to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement. According to the facility's policy, all incidents of abuse must be reported electronically to the Pennsylvania Department of Health within 24 hours and a completed investigation must be submitted within five working days. Additionally, the police should be contacted immediately in cases of sexual abuse. However, the facility did not adhere to these protocols in the cases of Resident 45 and Resident 42, who were both moderately cognitively impaired and subjected to inappropriate sexual behavior by Resident 6, who has a history of such behaviors known to the staff and administration. Resident 45, diagnosed with dementia, was inappropriately touched by Resident 6 in the dining room, as witnessed by multiple staff members including nurse aides and an LPN. Despite the staff's awareness and documentation of the incident, the facility did not report the abuse to the State Survey Agency or the local police. Similarly, Resident 42, diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, was also subjected to inappropriate sexual behavior by Resident 6, which was witnessed and documented by staff. Again, the facility failed to report this incident to the appropriate authorities. Interviews with various staff members, including nurse aides, an LPN, and an RN Supervisor, confirmed that the incidents were known and reported internally to the Director of Nursing. However, the facility did not follow through with the required external reporting. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the failure to report these incidents to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement, violating multiple Pennsylvania Code regulations regarding the responsibility of the licensee, management, resident rights, and nursing services.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation into the sexual abuse of two residents, Resident 45 and Resident 42, by Resident 6. The facility's policy on investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property was not followed. Specifically, the Registered Nurse Supervisor or Department Head did not immediately initiate an investigation, remove the alleged perpetrator, or notify the administrator/designee as required. Additionally, the facility did not arrange for medical attention for the victims, document and preserve evidence, or obtain written statements from all appropriate individuals on duty at the time of the incidents. Resident 45, who was moderately cognitively impaired and diagnosed with dementia, was touched inappropriately by Resident 6 in the dining room. Multiple staff members, including nurse aides and an LPN, witnessed the incident but did not follow the facility's policy for handling such situations. Similarly, Resident 42, who was also moderately cognitively impaired and diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, was groped by Resident 6. Staff members were aware of this behavior but failed to document it properly or initiate an investigation. Interviews with various staff members, including nurse aides and an RN, revealed that they were aware of the inappropriate behavior but did not take the necessary steps to address it. The Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility did not complete investigations into the sexual abuse of Resident 45 and Resident 42 by Resident 6. The facility's failure to follow its own policies and procedures resulted in a lack of proper investigation and response to the allegations of sexual abuse.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement person-centered comprehensive care plans for five residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific medical needs. Resident 2, who was admitted with a diagnosis of constipation, had multiple physician orders for managing constipation, including medications and interventions. However, the resident's care plan did not include these prescribed bowel regimens, failing to address the resident's diagnosed condition and necessary interventions. Similarly, Resident 60, who had functional incontinence and was placed on a prompted voiding program, did not have this condition or the required interventions included in their care plan, leading to inadequate management of their incontinence needs. Resident 6, admitted with hypertensive heart disease, exhibited sexually inappropriate behaviors towards female residents. Despite multiple incidents and new orders to monitor and document these behaviors, the resident's care plan did not address these behaviors or include specific interventions to manage them and protect other residents from potential abuse. This oversight resulted in continued inappropriate interactions, including an incident where Resident 6 touched another resident inappropriately in the dining room. Resident 61, with complex medical conditions including pancreatic cancer, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and an AICD device, had care needs related to potential complications and emergency care of the Mediport and AICD device that were not addressed in their care plan. The facility failed to document necessary interventions for monitoring and managing these devices. Similarly, Resident 14, diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea and congestive heart failure, had physician orders for BiPAP and oxygen therapy, but these were not included in the care plan, leading to inadequate documentation and management of their respiratory needs. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed these deficiencies during the survey.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by not ensuring that licensed and professional nurses promptly assessed residents following instances of sexual abuse. Specifically, two residents, one with dementia and another with multiple sclerosis, were victims of sexual abuse by another resident. Despite staff witnessing and reporting these incidents, there was no documented nursing assessment to identify potential trauma, skin injuries, bruising, or pain in the affected areas of the victims' bodies. Additionally, the facility did not follow physician's orders for administering a bowel protocol to promote bowel activity for two residents. One resident with a diagnosis of constipation did not receive the prescribed bowel regimen over a period of three days without a bowel movement. Similarly, another resident with pancreatic cancer and muscle weakness did not receive the ordered bowel regimen over four consecutive days without a bowel movement. There was no documented evidence that the staff notified the physician about the lack of bowel movements. Interviews with staff and a review of clinical records confirmed these deficiencies. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the physician's orders were not followed to promote normal bowel activity. The failure to promptly assess residents after instances of sexual abuse and to follow physician's orders for bowel protocols were confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the provision of a nourishing evening snack when more than 14 hours elapsed between the supper meal and breakfast the next day for several residents. The facility's Snacks Policy, last reviewed in January 2024, indicated that bulk snacks and beverages should be available upon request, and bedtime snacks should be provided to all residents. However, observations and interviews revealed that snacks and beverages were not consistently available or offered to residents in the evenings. Specifically, Resident 56 mentioned that evening snacks were not always offered, and a group of six alert and oriented residents confirmed that snacks were not routinely provided in the evenings unless specifically requested. Resident 27 noted that while a snack was provided upon request, it was not offered otherwise. An observation of the resident pantry on the [NAME] Unit showed that snacks and beverages such as milk and juice were not available as per the facility policy. The foodservice director confirmed that snacks are sent each evening for nursing staff to offer to residents, but there was no documented evidence to show that residents were routinely offered and provided with a bedtime snack. The administrator also failed to provide documentation supporting the routine offering of evening snacks. This deficiency was identified under 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing Services.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for three residents, leading to deficiencies in documentation and care. Resident 6, who was admitted with hypertensive heart disease, exhibited inappropriate and sexually inappropriate behaviors towards other residents. However, the clinical records lacked detailed documentation of these incidents, including the identities of the affected residents, the nature of the behaviors, and the dates of the interactions. This lack of documentation hindered the ability to monitor and address Resident 6's behaviors effectively. Resident 45, diagnosed with dementia, was a victim of sexual abuse by Resident 6. Despite staff witnessing and reporting the incident, Resident 45's clinical record did not document the abuse or include a nursing assessment for physical signs of injury. Similarly, Resident 42, diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, was also a victim of sexual abuse by Resident 6. Staff reported witnessing the abuse, but Resident 42's clinical record did not document the incidents or include a nursing assessment for injuries. Interviews with staff confirmed that the facility's licensed and professional nursing staff failed to document complete and accurate information in the residents' clinical records. The records did not accurately represent the residents' experiences, leading to a failure in providing appropriate care and monitoring. The facility's failure to maintain accurate and complete clinical records is a violation of professional standards and state regulations.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection for three residents. Resident 1, who had a stage 3 pressure ulcer and a Foley catheter, did not have Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) implemented as required. Observations on two separate dates revealed no evidence of EBP for this resident. Similarly, Resident 56, who had venous ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers, also did not have EBP implemented, as observed on two different occasions. Resident 59, with a tracheal stoma, was also found without the necessary EBP during two separate observations. The facility's infection preventionist confirmed that EBP were not implemented for these residents, despite the facility's policy and CDC guidelines requiring such measures for residents at higher risk of infection. The facility's policy, last reviewed in March 2024, mandates the use of gowns and gloves for residents with conditions like MDRO colonization, indwelling medical devices, and chronic wounds. However, the observations and clinical records indicate that these precautions were not followed for the three residents mentioned.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to timely notify the physician and the resident's representative of an incident involving potential sexual abuse. Resident 45, who has dementia, was touched inappropriately by Resident 6, who has hypertensive heart disease, in the dining room. This incident was witnessed by a nurse aide, Employee 3, who observed Resident 6 touching Resident 45 under her nightgown in the upper thigh area near her private area. Despite this observation, there was no documented evidence that the facility notified Resident 45's representative or attending physician about the incident of sexual abuse. An interview with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility did not notify the resident's representative and attending physician of the incident. This failure to communicate a significant change in the resident's condition and potential harm is a violation of the facility's policy on Notification of Changes, which mandates that any change in a resident's condition must be reported to the attending physician and the resident's representative.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to timely train one agency employee on the facility's abuse prohibition policy and procedures. An interview with the agency nurse aide revealed that it was her first day working in the facility, and she had not received an orientation or training on the facility's abuse policy before working with residents. A review of the employee's file showed no documented evidence of abuse training prior to her working on the nursing units. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that there was no documentation of the required training for the employee before she assumed her job duties.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that written notices regarding facility-initiated transfers to the hospital were provided to the residents and their representatives. This deficiency was identified for five residents (Resident 27, 7, 59, 66, and 29) based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews. The clinical records revealed that these residents were transferred to the hospital on various dates and, in some cases, returned to the facility. However, there was no documented evidence that written notifications, including the reason for the transfer, effective date, location, contact information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and information for the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities, were provided to the residents and their representatives upon each transfer. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that there was no evidence of written notifications being provided for these facility-initiated transfers. This failure to provide the required written notices is a violation of resident rights as stipulated by 28 Pa. Code 201.29 (c.3)(2). The deficiency was identified through a combination of clinical record reviews and staff interviews, highlighting a systemic issue in the facility's process for handling hospital transfers.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $100,369

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide residents or their representatives with written information about the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. This deficiency was identified in the cases of five residents out of 19 sampled. Specifically, Resident 27, Resident 7, Resident 59, Resident 66, and Resident 29 were transferred to the hospital on various dates and returned to the facility without documented evidence that they or their representatives received written notice of the bed hold policy. Resident 66, who was transferred to the hospital on February 24, 2024, expired at the hospital on February 28, 2024, and there was still no documented evidence of the bed hold policy being provided in writing. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility was unable to provide documented evidence of the provision of written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon hospital transfer. This failure to provide the required written information is a violation of 28 Pa Code 201.18 (e)(1) Management and 28 Pa Code 201.29 (b) Resident rights.