Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Quality Life Services - Henry Clay during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Document Provider Notification and Blood Sugar Rechecks: Facility records showed that staff did not document provider notification or required rechecks for multiple out-of-range blood glucose readings. One resident with diabetes and dementia had low BS values without rechecks or MD notification, another resident had both hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic episodes with treatment notes that did not document provider notification, and a third resident with diabetes and osteomyelitis had repeated high BS readings without documentation of notification or recheck. The DON and NHA confirmed the missing documentation.
The facility failed to ensure one suction unit in a resident room had documentation showing it was inspected and tested for safe operation. A suction unit at the bedside of a resident with a tracheostomy was observed without an inspection/testing log, and an RN, two LPNs, the NHA, and the DON confirmed the missing documentation and the failure to ensure the equipment was in safe operating condition.
A resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including a new diagnosis of diabetes, did not have their care plan updated to include goals or interventions for diabetes after being transferred to the hospital for symptoms related to the condition. Facility policy required timely and comprehensive care planning, but this was not followed, as confirmed by the NHA and DON.
Failure to Document Provider Notification and Blood Sugar Rechecks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document notifications to medical providers of increased and decreased capillary blood glucose levels and failed to document rechecks of out-of-range blood sugar values for three residents. Facility policy required licensed nurses to perform appropriate clinical observations and data collection, report clinical changes or abnormal lab values to the physician as indicated, and document the findings, physician notification, and response. The hypoglycemia protocol also directed staff to recheck blood sugar and notify the MD for low or high blood sugar levels. One resident with diabetes and dementia had blood sugar readings of 61 mg/dL on 5/6/26 and 57 mg/dL on 5/15/26, with no documentation of a recheck and no documentation that the provider was notified. Another resident with diabetes and hypertension had a blood sugar of 61 mg/dL on 5/20/26 with no documentation of recheck. That same resident also had a blood sugar of 472 mg/dL later that day, followed by glucose gel administration at 4:00 p.m. when the resident was described as leaning over in a wheelchair, diaphoretic, warm, clammy, and in and out of responsiveness with a blood sugar of 29 mg/dL; the note did not document provider notification. Additional blood sugar checks showed 46 mg/dL at 4:15 p.m. and 37 mg/dL at 4:30 p.m., with glucose gel noted as ineffective, followed by glucagon administration at 4:36 p.m. and another note that did not document provider notification. A third resident with diabetes and osteomyelitis had multiple elevated blood sugar readings without documentation of provider notification or blood sugar rechecks, including 425 mg/dL, 406 mg/dL, 554 mg/dL, 476 mg/dL, 491 mg/dL, and 466 mg/dL on separate dates. The resident’s physician orders required staff to call the MD for blood sugar values below or above specified thresholds, depending on the order in effect. During interviews, the DON confirmed the clinical record did not show documentation of provider notification or blood sugar rechecks for the identified residents, and the NHA and DON confirmed the facility failed to document notifications of medical providers and/or rechecks for the out-of-range blood sugar levels.
Suction Unit Lacked Inspection Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for one of five suction units located in Harmony Hills Hall Room 29-D. The facility assessment, last reviewed on 4/24/26, identified suction machines as medical equipment requiring routine inspection, maintenance checks, and recommended manufacturer maintenance. During an observation on 6/18/26 at 9:00 a.m., a suction unit at the bedside of a resident with a tracheostomy was observed without an inspection/testing log. During interviews on 6/18/26, RN E1, LPN E2, and LPN E23 each confirmed that the Harmony Hills Hall Room 29-D suction unit did not have documentation of inspection/testing and confirmed the facility failed to make certain the equipment was in safe operating condition. Later that morning, the NHA and DON also confirmed that the facility failed to make certain equipment was in safe operating condition.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident with New Diabetes Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed all of a resident's needs. Specifically, for one resident with a complex medical history including a history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction without residual deficits, bipolar disorder, morbid obesity, chronic pain syndrome, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and diabetes, the care plan initiated did not include goals or interventions for diabetes. The diagnosis of diabetes was added to the resident's record after the resident was transferred to the hospital for evaluation of symptoms such as diaphoresis, thirst, blurred vision, headache, and elevated blood sugar levels, which were related to the new diagnosis of diabetes. Review of facility policy indicated that an individualized, interdisciplinary care plan should be initiated within 24 hours of admission and updated as needed to reflect changes in the resident's condition. However, despite the addition of diabetes to the resident's diagnoses, the care plan was not updated to include this new diagnosis. This deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing during an interview.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 146 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Markleysburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Life Services - Markleysburg | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Goodwill Mennonite Home, Inc. | 16 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Laurel Ridge Center | 17.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Uniontown Nursing And Rehab | 17.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Mt Macrina Manor | 18.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Quality Life Services - Henry Clay.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.