Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Park Lane Post Acute Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with cognitive impairment and multiple medical diagnoses had an elastic bandage wrapped around the left wrist after a wrist x-ray, but staff did not monitor the skin underneath it. The bandage remained in place for days, and when the DON removed it, it was found covering a plastic ID bracelet with reddened, intact skin underneath. Staff and the DON stated there was no order for the bandage or for skin monitoring.
A resident with lung cancer and chronic respiratory failure was observed receiving continuous oxygen via N/C, but the chart did not contain a physician order for oxygen in the reviewed orders. Nursing notes documented oxygen being used at different flow rates over time, and later a new order was received to titrate oxygen as needed.
Medications ordered by the physician were not available for administration for two residents. One resident recovering from a hip fracture and ORIF missed multiple Heparin doses for DVT prevention because the medication was not in the cart or Pyxis, and the physician was not notified of several missed doses. Another resident with osteomyelitis missed multiple doses of Penicillin V Potassium because the medication was awaiting pharmacy delivery and later required a new script from the physician, with the DON confirming the meds were unavailable from the pharmacy.
Failure to follow contact precautions for a resident with C. diff and VRE was observed when staff entered the room without the required PPE, handled trash and linens without removing gloves or performing hand hygiene, and left the room without washing hands. One employee wore only a surgical mask at the bedside, while another wore only gloves and stated a gown was not needed despite a posted sign requiring gowns, gloves, and hand hygiene before entry and after exit.
A resident with a spinal fracture did not receive multiple scheduled doses of Lyrica and Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen due to pharmacy delays and medication unavailability. Nursing documentation confirmed the missed and delayed doses, and there was no evidence that the physician was notified about the missed medications. The DON verified that the medications were not administered as ordered because they were not available.
The facility failed to follow physician orders for obtaining and documenting weights and did not adequately monitor significant weight changes for three residents. One resident experienced a falsely elevated weight due to failure to subtract wheelchair weight, while two others were not weighed as ordered, resulting in missed identification of significant weight changes. These deficiencies were confirmed by staff interviews and record reviews.
Two residents with psychiatric diagnoses were prescribed antipsychotic medications, but their clinical records did not show any monitoring of behaviors or medication side effects as required by facility policy. The DON confirmed that this monitoring was not conducted while the residents were receiving these medications.
A resident with spinal stenosis and lumbar disc degeneration, who required assistance with mobility and transfers, reported that two CNAs were rough during care. The facility did not thoroughly investigate this allegation, as required by policy, and failed to obtain statements from the involved staff or interview potential witnesses until prompted by a surveyor.
A resident admitted with a right heel pressure injury did not receive a comprehensive wound assessment upon admission, and the wound physician's updated orders for daily wound care were not followed, resulting in missed treatments for an unstageable pressure ulcer.
A resident with a tracheostomy and PEG tube, diagnosed with protein-calorie malnutrition and chronic respiratory failure, did not receive enteral nutrition as ordered by the physician. Documentation showed significant discrepancies in the volume of tube feeding administered on several days, and an LPN confirmed that the feeding order was not being documented correctly.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure and hypoxia was not provided with the physician-ordered tracheostomy collar and 28% humidified oxygen at 2L/min. Observation and staff interviews confirmed that the resident was not receiving the prescribed oxygen therapy, despite staff awareness of the order.
A resident with a history of bipolar disorder, major depression, and sleep apnea did not receive a prescribed medication for several days because it was not available from the pharmacy. Nursing documentation showed the medication remained on order and was not administered, and the physician was not consistently notified of the missed doses. The DON confirmed the medication was not given due to unavailability.
A large accumulation of ice was observed on the fans and ceiling of the walk-in freezer, extending down to food boxes on the top shelf. The issue persisted over two days, with both the Dietary Director and the Nursing Home Administrator confirming the ongoing ice buildup.
The facility failed to timely certify the completion of MDS assessments for nine residents. These residents were either discharged home, admitted to the hospital, or had expired in the facility, but their respective MDS assessments were not finalized as required by the guidelines.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for three residents requiring such measures. Observations revealed a lack of EBP signage and PPE in the rooms of residents with indwelling catheters, MRSA, and colostomies. Additionally, the first-floor nursing unit lacked EBP signage and PPE, and staff were observed not using PPE when entering and exiting rooms requiring EBP.
The facility failed to complete comprehensive MDS assessments within the required time frame for five residents. Admission MDS assessments for four residents were either not completed or listed as in progress, and one resident's annual assessment was also not completed. This deficiency was previously cited under relevant state codes.
The facility failed to complete quarterly MDS assessments within the required 92-day timeframe for four residents. The assessments for these residents were either not completed or listed as in progress, based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews.
The facility failed to notify the State LTC Ombudsman's office of resident transfers or discharges for three residents. One resident was sent to the hospital for bilateral lower extremity pain, another for a right knee infection, and a third for a urinary tract infection. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the lack of notification.
The facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for two residents. One resident was admitted with a venous stasis ulcer that was not documented in the MDS, and another resident's MRSA diagnosis was omitted from the MDS. These discrepancies were confirmed by the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility failed to develop baseline care plans for three residents upon admission. One resident had a PICC line and IV anti-fungal medication, another had MRSA of the left foot, and the third had a colostomy. These omissions were confirmed by the DON and Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with multiple medical needs, including anticoagulant medication and various wounds. The resident had no care plan or interventions for these conditions, which was confirmed by the DON.
The facility failed to follow physician's weight monitoring orders for two residents. One resident's weights were not recorded due to a broken Hoyer lift, and another resident's hospital weight was incorrectly used as a baseline. The facility's policy mandates weight monitoring as directed by physicians, but this was not adhered to.
The facility failed to follow a physician's order and wound specialist's recommendation for a resident with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. The resident's wound treatment was not updated as recommended, and the resident was not assisted out of bed as ordered. This was confirmed through observations and interviews with staff and the resident.
The facility failed to provide treatment and services to maintain or restore bladder continence for a resident who became frequently incontinent after being readmitted from the hospital. The facility did not follow its policy on continence care, and no comprehensive assessment or treatment was documented.
A facility failed to ensure timely availability of Verapamil for a resident with hypertension and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. The medication, ordered on April 12, 2024, was not administered until four days later due to delays in delivery from the pharmacy. The facility's emergency medication list did not include Verapamil.
Failure to Monitor Skin Under Elastic Bandage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor Resident 37's skin after an elastic bandage was placed around the left wrist and left in place for several days. Resident 37 was moderately cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for substantial assistance with personal care. The resident's diagnoses included pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension, and cardiomyopathy, and the resident was receiving diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, anticonvulsant, and continuous oxygen therapy. The resident reported that the left wrist had been x-rayed because of pain, and an elastic bandage was observed wrapped around the wrist. Review of the physician orders showed an x-ray order for the left hand and wrist, and nursing progress notes indicated no fracture was present. When the elastic bandage was still present several days later, the resident stated it had been on for days and did not know who placed it there. An employee stated they were aware of the wrist x-ray but did not place a bandage on the wrist. The DON stated there was no order to place the bandage or monitor the skin underneath it. When the DON removed the bandage, it was found to be covering a plastic identification bracelet on the left wrist, and the skin underneath was reddened but intact.
Missing Physician Order for Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a physician order for oxygen was entered before continuous oxygen was administered to Resident 25. Resident 25’s admission MDS dated March 11, 2026 showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, totally dependent on staff for care needs, and had diagnoses including lung cancer and chronic respiratory failure. The resident was also receiving antianxiety, hypnotic, anticoagulant, antibiotic, opioid medications, and oxygen therapy. Review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated March 31, 2026 to admit the resident to hospice, but no orders for oxygen therapy were present in the physician orders reviewed for March 2026 or effective May 4, 2026. Despite this, nursing progress notes documented oxygen use at varying flow rates, including 4.5 L via N/C, 5 L via N/C, 2 L via N/C, 4 L via N/C, and 4 L via N/C with the head of bed elevated for comfort. On May 4, 2026, the resident was observed receiving 4 LPM of oxygen via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator, and the tubing was labeled April 28, 2026. A later nursing note documented receipt of a new order to titrate oxygen as needed and placement on 6 L/min with good results.
Medications Not Available for Ordered Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered medications were available for administration for two residents. One resident was readmitted after a left hip fracture and ORIF, and had an order for Heparin Sodium injection every 8 hours for DVT prevention. The April 2026 MAR showed missed doses on April 27 and April 28, and nursing notes documented that the medication was not in the cart or Pyxis and had been reordered from the pharmacy. The record also showed that the physician was not notified of several missed Heparin doses. The DON confirmed the medication was not administered because it was unavailable from the pharmacy. Another resident had an active order for Penicillin V Potassium 500 mg by mouth twice daily for osteomyelitis. The April and May 2026 MAR showed multiple missed doses over several days, and nursing notes repeatedly documented that the medication was not available, was awaiting pharmacy delivery, or required a new physician script for refill. Notes also showed staff contacted the pharmacy and left a note for the physician requesting a new script. The DON confirmed the medication was not administered because it was unavailable from the pharmacy.
Failure to Follow Contact Precautions for Resident with C. diff and VRE
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement infection prevention and control measures for a resident on contact precautions for C. diff and VRE in a wound. The resident had been readmitted after a hospital stay for sepsis from a sacral pressure injury and C. diff colitis, and the physician order specified contact precautions related to VRE in the wound and C. diff positive status. A sign posted on the resident’s door directed staff to clean hands before entering and leaving the room, and to put on gloves and a gown before room entry and discard them before room exit. During observation, Employee E6 was in the resident’s room wearing only a surgical mask while standing at the bedside, talking to and examining the resident. Employee E5 was observed wearing only gloves while removing garbage from the room, leaving without removing gloves or washing hands, pushing a cart with clean linens in the hallway while still carrying the garbage bag, and then entering the soiled room. Employee E5 stated a gown was not needed because they only repositioned the resident and removed trash, and also stated there were no signs indicating gowns were required, despite the posted contact precaution sign. Employee E6 was also observed leaving the room without washing hands and using the wall sanitizer across the room after exiting; the employee confirmed they did not wash hands before leaving the room. The DON was informed of these observations.
Failure to Provide Timely Pharmaceutical Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that prescribed medications were made available and administered as ordered for a resident with a T11-T12 compression fracture. Clinical and pharmacy records showed that the resident was prescribed Lyrica 25 mg to be given three times daily, but three consecutive doses were missed because the medication was not delivered from the pharmacy in time. Nursing progress notes documented the unavailability of Lyrica throughout the day, and pharmacy delivery records confirmed the medication was not delivered until the following day. Additionally, there was no evidence in the clinical records that the physician was notified about the missed doses. Further review revealed that the resident was also prescribed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen for back pain, but a scheduled dose was not administered on time due to unavailability, resulting in a delayed administration. The DON confirmed that both medications were not given as ordered because they were not available from the pharmacy. These findings demonstrate that the facility did not meet the requirement to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident, as required by state regulations.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders and Monitor Significant Weight Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders and adequately monitor significant weight changes for three residents reviewed for nutrition. For one resident with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease, daily weights were ordered with instructions to subtract the wheelchair weight. However, a significant weight gain of over 40 pounds was recorded within four days due to failure to subtract the wheelchair weight, as confirmed by the dietitian and staff interviews. The Director of Nursing was unable to provide a valid explanation for this discrepancy, and the resident's weight was not appropriately monitored or addressed. Another resident with progressive bulbar palsy, severe protein calorie malnutrition, ALS, and other complex conditions was ordered to have weekly weights for four weeks. The clinical record showed that the resident was not weighed on one of the scheduled dates, and there was no documented explanation for the missed weight. The dietitian confirmed that nursing staff were responsible for obtaining weights and that the missed weight was reported to the nursing supervisor the following day, but the physician's orders for weekly weights were not followed. A third resident with dementia, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and depression was also ordered to have weekly weights. The clinical record revealed a significant weight loss of 12.2 pounds between two documented weights, and there was no evidence that a weight was obtained on one of the scheduled dates as ordered. These findings demonstrate that the facility did not ensure physician orders for weights were followed and failed to adequately monitor and address significant weight changes for these residents.
Failure to Monitor Behaviors and Side Effects for Residents on Antipsychotic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor behaviors and potential side effects for residents who were prescribed antipsychotic medications. According to the facility's policy, psychotropic drugs should only be administered when necessary to treat a specific, documented condition, and the resident's response to the medication must be monitored and documented. Additionally, residents receiving antipsychotic medications are required to have an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test performed as per facility policy. A review of clinical records for two residents with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depression, and generalized anxiety disorder revealed that both were prescribed antipsychotic medications (Abilify and Chlorpromazine). However, there was no documentation that behaviors or medication side effects were monitored during the periods the medications were administered. The DON confirmed that this monitoring was not performed for these residents while they were receiving antipsychotic medications.
Failure to Investigate Allegation of Rough Care by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff being rough with a resident during care. According to the facility's policy, any suspicion or report of abuse, neglect, or exploitation requires a comprehensive investigation, including identifying and interviewing all involved parties and documenting the findings. In this case, a resident with spinal stenosis and lumbar disc degeneration, who required assistance with bed mobility and transfers, reported that two CNAs were rough while providing care. The facility's documentation addressed the resident's concern about not receiving medication but did not include a thorough investigation into the allegation of rough care. Specifically, the investigation report lacked statements from the two staff members accused of being rough and did not include interviews with other potential witnesses. It was only after the surveyor's inquiry that statements from the alleged staff were obtained, well after the initial report. This failure to promptly and thoroughly investigate the allegation of rough care constituted a deficiency under the relevant state codes.
Failure to Assess and Treat Pressure Ulcer per Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessment and appropriate wound care for a resident admitted with a right heel pressure injury. Upon admission, the skin assessment identified a right heel pressure area but did not document the wound's stage, size, appearance, drainage, odor, or the condition of the surrounding skin. The admitting nurse did not perform a thorough assessment as required by facility policy, and a comprehensive evaluation was not completed until the wound physician's consult two days later, which identified the wound as an unstageable pressure ulcer with significant slough. Additionally, the facility did not follow the wound physician's updated treatment recommendations. The physician ordered daily wound care with saline, medical grade honey, and foam dressing, but the Treatment Administration Record showed that the prescribed treatment was not performed on two consecutive days. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the physician's orders were not followed, resulting in missed wound care for the resident's unstageable pressure ulcer.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Enteral Nutrition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders regarding the administration of enteral nutrition for a resident diagnosed with unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition and chronic respiratory failure. The resident was admitted with a tracheostomy and a PEG tube, with a physician's order specifying continuous tube feeding of Nutren 1.5 at 60 mL/hour for 20 hours per day, totaling 1200 mL. Review of the medication administration record showed significant discrepancies in the actual volumes administered on multiple days, with amounts ranging from 60 mL to 3405 mL, deviating from the prescribed total. A licensed nurse confirmed that the tube feeding order was not being documented correctly, indicating a failure to ensure the physician's order was followed.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders for respiratory care for a resident with chronic respiratory failure and hypoxia. According to the clinical record, the resident had a physician order for a tracheostomy collar with 28% humidified oxygen delivered via a concentrator set at 2L/min. During an observation, the resident was found not to be receiving the ordered two liters of oxygen. Staff interviews confirmed that the tracheostomy setup had not been changed since the last check earlier that morning, and the nurse was able to recite the correct order but did not ensure it was being followed. This failure resulted in the resident not receiving the prescribed oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician.
Failure to Provide Timely Medication Due to Pharmacy Delay
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a prescribed medication, Armodafinil 250 mg, was made available and administered to a resident diagnosed with bipolar disorder, major depression, and sleep apnea. The physician's order for Armodafinil was dated April 23, 2025, to be given once daily for a sleep disorder. However, the medication was not administered on five consecutive days as documented in the Medication Administration Record. Nursing progress notes indicated that the medication was still on order from the pharmacy and not available during this period. Additionally, while the physician was notified of the missed medication on the first day, there was no documentation that the physician was notified of the missed doses on the subsequent days. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the medication was not administered due to its unavailability from the pharmacy. This resulted in the resident not receiving the ordered medication as required.
Unsanitary Food Storage Due to Ice Accumulation in Freezer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner as evidenced by observations in the walk-in freezer, where a large accumulation of ice was found on the fans and ceiling, extending down to the food boxes on the top shelf. This condition was observed on two consecutive days, with the ice buildup still present during the second observation. The Dietary Director confirmed the presence of the ice and stated that it is typically cleaned after lunch. The Nursing Home Administrator also confirmed the ongoing issue during an interview. No information about residents or their medical conditions was provided in relation to this deficiency. The deficiency was cited under 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management and 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary services.
Failure to Timely Certify MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely certify the completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for nine sampled residents. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual mandates that the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date. However, the review of clinical records and progress notes revealed that discharge MDS assessments for Residents 6, 40, 42, 50, 57, 65, 76, 77, and 99 were not completed and were listed as in progress. These residents were either discharged home, admitted to the hospital, or had expired in the facility, but their respective MDS assessments were not finalized as required by the guidelines. Specifically, Resident 6 was discharged home, but the discharge MDS assessment was still in progress. Similarly, Residents 40, 42, 57, and 77 were discharged home, and their discharge MDS assessments were also incomplete. Resident 50 and Resident 76 were admitted to the hospital, but their discharge MDS assessments were not completed. Resident 65 was discharged to the community, and the discharge MDS was still in progress. Lastly, Resident 99 expired in the facility, and the Death in Facility MDS was listed as in progress. This failure to complete the MDS assessments in a timely manner is a violation of the regulatory requirements for nursing services as cited in 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(5).
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were in place for residents requiring such precautions. The facility's policy, revised March 26, 2024, mandates the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities for residents with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), chronic wounds, or indwelling medical devices. However, observations during the survey revealed that no EBP signage or personal protective equipment (PPE) was present in the rooms of three residents who required these precautions. Specifically, Resident 50 had an indwelling catheter, Resident 212 had osteomyelitis of the left foot with MRSA, and Resident 213 had a colostomy, yet none of their rooms displayed the required EBP signage or PPE. Additionally, the surveyors observed that the first-floor nursing unit lacked EBP signage on any resident rooms that required it, and no PPE was present in resident rooms or hallways. Multiple observations of staff entering and exiting rooms requiring EBP showed no evidence of PPE use. This failure to implement the facility's EBP policy was noted as a deficiency, as it did not comply with the required infection prevention and control measures for residents with specific medical conditions and devices.
Failure to Complete MDS Assessments in Required Time Frame
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed within the required time frame for five of the twelve residents reviewed. According to the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, a comprehensive admission MDS assessment must be completed no later than 14 days following admission, and an annual assessment must be completed at least once every 12 months. The clinical records revealed that the admission MDS assessments for Residents 27, 166, 212, and 214 were either not completed or listed as in progress, with ARDs ranging from April 11, 2024, to April 17, 2023. Additionally, Resident 262's annual assessment with an ARD of November 3, 2023, was also not completed and listed as in progress. This deficiency was previously cited on June 23, 2023, under 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(1) Management and 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records.
Failure to Complete Quarterly MDS Assessments Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required 92-day timeframe for four residents. Resident 5 had an assessment reference date (ARD) of March 15, 2024, which was not completed and listed as in progress. Resident 22 had an ARD of March 6, 2024, and the assessment was not completed. Resident 50 had an ARD of March 22, 2024, and the assessment was also not completed and listed as in progress. Resident 211 had an ARD of November 14, 2023, which was not completed and listed as in progress. These findings were based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews.
Failure to Notify Ombudsman of Resident Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman's office of residents transferred or discharged for three residents. Resident 50 was sent to the hospital for evaluation due to bilateral lower extremity pain, but there was no documented evidence of notification to the Ombudsman's office. Resident 64 was sent back to the hospital for further treatment of a right knee infection, and again, there was no notification to the Ombudsman's office. Resident 76 was admitted to the hospital due to a urinary tract infection, and similarly, there was no evidence of notification to the Ombudsman's office. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility did not notify the State Ombudsman's office when residents were transferred or discharged.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for two residents. Resident 50 was admitted with a left medial ankle venous stasis ulcer, as indicated in the hospital readmission skin assessment, but the admission MDS assessment did not document this condition. The Director of Nursing confirmed this discrepancy. Similarly, Resident 212 was admitted with a diagnosis of a left foot infection caused by MRSA, as noted in the clinical progress note, but this diagnosis was not included in the Admission/5 day MDS. Both the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that Resident 212's MDS did not accurately reflect the resident's status.
Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plans for New Admissions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed upon admission for three residents. Resident 93 was admitted with a PICC line and an order for Micafungin Sodium IV solution for post-abdominal surgery. However, a care plan for the PICC line and IV anti-fungal medication was not developed. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing during an interview on April 19, 2024. Resident 212 was admitted with a diagnosis of MRSA of the left foot, but the baseline care plan did not include this condition. Similarly, Resident 213 was admitted with a colostomy, and the baseline care plan failed to document this. Both the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of baseline care plans for these conditions during an interview on April 19, 2024.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident 50, who had multiple medical needs. The resident had a physician's order for Heparin Sodium Injection 5000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours, dated December 22, 2023, but there was no care plan or interventions addressing the anticoagulant medication. Additionally, Resident 50 had arterial wounds on both ankles, the left first MTP, right medial foot, right lateral ankle, and both heels, as well as a venous ulcer on the left calf and pressure ulcers on the right and left buttocks. Despite these conditions, there was no care plan or interventions addressing the wounds. The Director of Nursing confirmed on April 19, 2024, that Resident 50 did not have a care plan for the anticoagulant or wounds. This deficiency was previously cited on June 23, 2023, under 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records and 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Failure to Follow Physician's Weight Monitoring Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow the physician's weight monitoring orders for two residents, Resident 64 and Resident 263. Resident 64, who was readmitted with diagnoses including lymphedema and a right knee infection, had a physician's order for daily weights for three days. However, the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed that weights were not recorded on two of the required days. Nursing progress notes indicated that the Hoyer lift was broken, preventing the weight measurements. Similarly, Resident 263, admitted with a feeding tube due to a cerebrovascular accident, had a physician's order for daily weights for three days. The TAR revealed that only the hospital weight was recorded, and no weight was taken on the second day as required. The dietitian confirmed that the hospital weight should not have been used as a baseline and could not explain why the physician's order was not followed. The facility's policy, dated August 1, 2023, mandates that residents be weighed as directed by the physician, federal/state regulations, or standards of practice. Despite this policy, the facility did not ensure that the physician's orders for weight monitoring were followed for both residents. This failure was confirmed through clinical records review and staff interviews, indicating a lapse in adherence to prescribed medical orders and facility policy.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders and Wound Specialist Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a physician's order and the wound specialist's recommendation for a resident with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. The resident was admitted with a severe sacral wound, and the physician's order dated January 19, 2024, specified a treatment regimen involving an acetic wash and Medihoney with calcium alginate. However, a wound consult on March 12, 2024, recommended changing the acetic wash to a saline solution. This recommendation was not followed, as evidenced by observations on April 19, 2024, where the wound was still being cleaned with an acetic solution. The clinical record did not show that the primary physician was notified of the wound specialist's new recommendation, and the facility could not provide documentation explaining why the recommendation was not followed. Additionally, the facility failed to adhere to a physician's order for the resident to be out of bed for two hours during lunch. Observations on April 17 and 18, 2024, revealed that the resident remained in bed during the specified times. The resident reported that staff did not offer to assist them out of bed and expressed a desire to be out of bed for a few hours, as recommended by the wound doctor. An interview with an agency nursing assistant confirmed that the resident was not offered to be out of bed based on a report that the resident does not get out of bed. This information was conveyed to the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged the failure to follow the physician's orders and wound specialist's recommendations.
Failure to Maintain or Restore Bladder Continence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide treatment and services to maintain or restore bladder continence for one resident. The facility's policy on bowel and bladder continence care includes a structured voiding schedule and consultation with therapy and nursing for any changes or concerns. However, the facility did not follow this policy for Resident 64, who was initially assessed as always continent but later became frequently incontinent after being readmitted from the hospital. The clinical records did not show any comprehensive bladder continence assessment or any treatment or services provided to address the change in the resident's urinary status. An interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not comprehensively assess the resident's urinary continence upon identifying the change and failed to implement any treatment or services to restore or maintain the resident's urinary status. This deficiency was cited under multiple Pennsylvania codes, indicating a failure in management, clinical records, and nursing services.
Failure to Ensure Timely Availability of Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were made available for a resident diagnosed with hypertension and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. A physician's order for Verapamil HCL ER 240 mg, to be administered daily at bedtime, was issued on April 12, 2024. However, the medication was not administered until April 16, 2024, four days after the order was placed. Nursing progress notes indicated that the medication was en route from the pharmacy on April 12, 2024, and subsequent notes on April 14 and April 15, 2024, showed that the facility was still waiting for the pharmacy to deliver the medication. The pharmacy records confirmed that the medication was not delivered until late on April 15, 2024. Additionally, the facility's emergency medication list did not include Verapamil. This information was discussed with the Director of Nursing on April 19, 2024.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,212 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 12 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near West Chester
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barclay Friends | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Aventura At Pembrooke | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 1 |
| Exton Post Acute | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 1 |
| Green Meadows Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Park Lane Post Acute Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.