Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Oak Glen Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility’s HIPAA policy requires all workforce members to safeguard PHI, but an administrative employee emailed a resident’s responsible party with attachments that included clinical progress notes for several other residents. This resulted in PHI for multiple residents being disclosed to an individual who was not authorized to receive their medical records, constituting a failure to maintain confidentiality of resident-identifiable information.
Two residents reported receiving cold coffee and food, and observation revealed staff serving meals and beverages at improper temperatures, with some items uncovered and lacking adequate utensils or lids. Food and drink temperatures were measured below acceptable standards, and staff confirmed shortages of necessary supplies during meal service.
The facility did not obtain food from approved or satisfactory sources and failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food according to professional standards.
The facility did not honor a resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and failed to establish a grievance policy or make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Surveyors found that the facility did not have an infection prevention and control program in place, resulting in a lack of structured measures to prevent and control infections among residents and staff.
Two residents seated together in the dining room experienced unequal meal service when a nurse aide instructed one not to touch their sandwich until the other had food, but then left to serve another table. One resident ate while the other waited, and the resident who had already eaten was served a hot meal before the other received any food. This sequence resulted in one resident eating in front of the other, compromising resident dignity.
A resident was moved to a different unit and assigned a roommate without receiving written notice or an explanation for the change. The resident was not shown the new room or given the opportunity to meet the new roommate, and staff confirmed that no written documentation was provided regarding the move.
Nursing staff, including RNs and LPNs, did not have documented competency evaluations for indwelling catheter care and medication administration, despite caring for residents with these needs. The facility could not provide evidence of completed competency assessments or demonstrations for these staff members when requested by surveyors.
A dietary aide, working independently, was found to be unaware of required dish machine temperature checks and had not received training or competency assessment for essential dietary duties. The dining director confirmed there was no documentation of training or competency for dietary staff.
The facility did not ensure complete and accurate clinical records for two residents by failing to document required meal intake monitoring as outlined in their care plans. Additionally, after a resident's death, an LPN destroyed controlled substances without a required witness signature, and no dual signature documentation was found, contrary to facility policy.
A resident who had previously received pneumococcal vaccines and whose responsible party had consented to further vaccination was not offered an additional pneumococcal vaccine dose, as recommended by CDC guidelines. Facility records showed no evidence of clinical review or decision-making regarding the administration of PCV20 or PCV21, and staff confirmed the vaccine was not offered.
Two residents who required staff assistance for personal hygiene did not receive timely or adequate support with showers and shaving. One resident went several days without a shower or shaving assistance, while another, with severe cognitive impairment, was observed with significant facial hair and received only a partial shave after the issue was identified. These deficiencies were confirmed through observation, record review, and interviews with staff and facility leadership.
The facility did not ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Surveyors observed environmental hazards and insufficient staff monitoring, resulting in a deficiency related to resident safety.
A facility failed to maintain an orderly environment due to a leaking roof in a main hallway, affecting a resident. Observations showed water dripping through ceiling tiles onto the carpet, with trash cans placed to catch the water. The issue persisted since January, despite obtaining a repair quote in May. The director of maintenance and the administrator confirmed the ongoing problem.
The facility failed to provide adequate care for residents with cardiac pacemakers and central venous catheters. A resident with a PICC line lacked a care plan for arm use restrictions and emergency procedures. Another resident with a pacemaker had no plan for remote monitoring, and the facility did not verify the need for a pacemaker check machine. A third resident with an IJ CVC had no emergency procedures or documentation for a dressing change, and staff education lacked guidance on emergency measures and assessments for CVCs.
The facility's main kitchen was found to have several sanitation deficiencies, including dusty equipment, improperly stored food items, and expired products. Observations included a dusty fan in the dishwashing area, open and undated food items in storage, and expired products in the walk-in coolers. Additionally, shelves and a knife rack had accumulated dust and debris.
A facility failed to maintain consistent documentation regarding a resident's advance directives. The resident's clinical record showed a DNR order, but a form indicated the health care agent had not decided on CPR status. This inconsistency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
A facility failed to maintain a resident's ambulation status as part of a restorative program. The program required daily ambulation with a front-wheeled walker, but documentation showed the task was not completed on several days. The resident refused the task during the day shift, and the evening shift marked it as not applicable without further explanation. The ADON confirmed the task should be completed daily, but there was no documentation reviewing the resident's plan or refusals.
A facility failed to properly use a positional device for a resident with contractures, as observed with a travel neck pillow incorrectly positioned behind the resident's neck. Staff interviews revealed a lack of documentation and guidance on the correct use of the pillow, contributing to the deficiency in care for the resident's range of motion limitations.
A facility failed to provide timely access to a complete medical record for a resident during a survey. Despite attempts to resolve the issue, the surveyor was unable to access all necessary physician orders, including medications and advance care planning decisions, until the third day of the survey. This delay impeded the survey process.
A resident did not receive an offer for a COVID-19 vaccine booster as per CDC guidelines, despite being eligible. The resident's last booster was in early 2023, and there was no record of refusal or offer for a 2024 booster. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of documentation in the resident's medical records.
Unauthorized Disclosure of Multiple Residents’ PHI via Email
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of protected health information (PHI) for multiple residents when responding to a medical record request. The facility’s HIPAA Privacy and Security Policy, dated March 20, 2025, states that all workforce members are responsible for safeguarding PHI in any form and defines PHI as information that identifies or can reasonably be used to identify a resident and relates to the resident’s health condition, care, or payment for care. Despite this policy, an administrative employee (Employee 1) sent an email to the responsible party of Resident 1 in response to a request for that resident’s medical record. During an interview and concurrent review of the email, it was determined that Employee 1 erroneously attached and transmitted PHI belonging to multiple other residents, including Residents 3, 5, and 8, in addition to the requested information for Resident 1. The extra attachment contained progress notes from the clinical records of these additional residents, whose responsible party had not authorized this individual to receive their records. The email, sent on February 10, 2026, at 3:01 PM, therefore disclosed confidential medical record information for Residents 3, 5, and 8 to an unauthorized recipient. In a subsequent phone meeting, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that sending the PHI for these residents was a mistake.
Failure to Provide Palatable Food and Beverages at Appropriate Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food and beverages that were palatable and served at appropriate temperatures for residents on the Evergreen unit. Two residents reported that their coffee and food were sometimes cold, with one resident specifically stating the coffee was cold when eating in the dining room. During observation of lunch meal service, staff were seen serving meals from a steam table and distributing beverages from a cart. As meal service concluded, staff assembled trays for room delivery, placing uncovered beverages and food items on trays, some of which were served in disposable foam containers without lids. Staff were observed struggling with a depleted coffee supply, resulting in only half-filled cups, and acknowledged a lack of sufficient plate covers, silverware, and beverage lids in the dining room. When a resident's tray was delivered, it contained lukewarm food and beverages, with temperatures measured below acceptable standards for palatability: beef stroganoff at 104°F, carrots at 103.5°F, coffee at 99.1°F, tomato soup at 104.8°F, and milk at 53.7°F. The food service manager confirmed that there should have been an adequate supply of silverware, food, beverages, and lids, and acknowledged that the temperatures recorded were not within acceptable ranges. These findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator.
Failure to Follow Food Procurement and Safety Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to procure food from sources that are approved or considered satisfactory and did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards. This deficiency was identified during the survey process, indicating that the facility did not meet regulatory requirements for food safety and handling. No additional details about specific residents, staff, or events are provided in the report.
Failure to Honor Resident Grievance Rights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Additionally, the facility did not establish a grievance policy or make prompt efforts to resolve grievances as required. This deficiency was identified based on observations and findings that the facility did not have appropriate procedures in place to address and resolve resident grievances in a timely and non-discriminatory manner.
Failure to Implement Infection Prevention and Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. This deficiency was identified during the survey process, as the facility did not have an established or operational program to prevent and control infections among residents and staff. The absence of such a program was directly observed and documented by surveyors.
Failure to Ensure Resident Dignity During Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
During a lunch meal service on the Memory Care unit, two residents were seated together in the dining room awaiting their meals. A nurse aide placed a sandwich in front of one resident and instructed them not to touch it because the other resident at the table had not yet received anything, then proceeded to serve another table. Despite the instruction, the resident picked up the sandwich, prompting the aide to remind them not to touch it. The resident explained they were just looking at the sandwich. The resident then consumed the sandwich while the other resident at the table watched and waited, as the hot lunch meal had not yet arrived. Later, the resident who had already eaten the sandwich was served a hot meal before the other resident, who continued to wait. The second resident did not receive their meal until after the first resident had finished eating both the sandwich and the hot meal. These events were observed and later reviewed with facility leadership.
Failure to Provide Written Notice and Choice Prior to Resident Room Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for a room change, to a resident prior to a facility-initiated room change. The resident, who was observed in a wheelchair near the nurses' station, reported uncertainty about the reason for his move, the specific room he would be moving to, and whether he would have a roommate. He stated that he had not been shown any potential new rooms and that being told a room number would not be meaningful without seeing the room. The resident indicated he was informed of the move a couple of days prior but did not receive written documentation. Review of the clinical record showed that a social worker documented a discussion with the resident about the room change and noted the resident was agreeable, but there was no evidence that written notice was provided to the resident or his responsible party. Additionally, there was no documentation that the resident was given the opportunity to see the new room or meet his new roommate, despite the fact that he would now have a roommate when he previously did not. Facility staff confirmed the lack of written notice and documentation regarding the room change.
Lack of Documented Competency for Catheter Care and Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff, including registered nurses and licensed practical nurses, possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary for the care and assessment of residents with indwelling urinary catheters and for medication administration. Documentation review revealed that, out of a 100 resident census, 15 residents had indwelling urinary catheters and multiple residents received medications. When surveyors requested evidence of staff competencies for indwelling catheter care and medication administration for three employees, the facility was unable to provide documentation of completed competency evaluations or demonstrations in these areas. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of such documentation, indicating that the required competencies had not been verified for the involved employees.
Lack of Competent Dietary Staff and Training for Essential Kitchen Duties
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient and competent dietary staff to perform essential kitchen duties, as evidenced by the experience of a dietary aide who had been employed for one month. During an observation, the aide was found washing breakfast dishes and flatware in the main kitchen using an industrial dishwashing machine. When asked about the dish machine temperature log, which is necessary to ensure proper sanitization, the aide stated she was unaware of the log, did not know how to check or record the temperatures, and had not been shown how to perform these tasks since being hired. She also indicated she was working independently, responsible for washing breakfast dishes before the designated dishwasher arrived later in the morning. Further interview with the dining director confirmed there was no evidence that the dietary aide, or any other dining/dietary staff, had been trained or deemed competent to perform dishwashing or other essential dietary duties independently. There was no written documentation of training or competency for dietary staff since the aide's hire date. These findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator.
Incomplete Clinical Records and Improper Medication Destruction Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for three residents. For two residents with care plans addressing potential alterations in nutritional status and pressure ulcers, the care plans required staff to monitor and record meal intake at every meal. However, clinical record reviews revealed that meal intake was not documented on several specified dates as directed by the care plans. This lack of documentation was confirmed by staff interviews, indicating that the required monitoring and recording of nutritional intake did not occur as outlined. Additionally, for a resident who had passed away, the facility did not properly document the destruction of controlled substances as required by policy. The medication disposition logs for lorazepam and morphine indicated that these medications were destroyed by an LPN, but the witness signature fields were left blank, and no documentation of dual signatures could be found. This failure to document the destruction of medications was confirmed by staff and was not in accordance with the facility's policy, which requires the presence and attestation of at least two licensed healthcare professionals.
Failure to Administer Pneumococcal Vaccine to Eligible Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer a pneumococcal vaccine to a resident who was eligible and had provided consent to receive it. According to the facility's Infection Control - Vaccination Policy, residents are to be offered immunizations in accordance with CDC guidelines unless medically contraindicated or previously vaccinated. Clinical record review showed that the resident had previously received both the PPSV23 and PCV13 vaccines, with the last dose administered more than five years prior to the current review. Despite this, there was no documentation that the interdisciplinary team reviewed the resident's condition or made a decision regarding the administration of a subsequent dose of PCV20 or PCV21, as recommended by CDC guidelines for adults who have completed the earlier vaccine series. The resident's responsible party had signed a consent form for pneumococcal vaccination, indicating willingness to proceed with further immunization. However, staff interviews confirmed that the resident was not offered the vaccine, and there was no evidence of shared clinical decision-making or assessment for additional vaccination. The deficiency was identified through policy review, clinical record examination, and staff interviews, and was confirmed by the infection control prevention coordinator and discussed with the Nursing Home Administrator.
Failure to Provide ADL Assistance for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for two residents who were dependent on staff for personal hygiene. One resident, who was totally dependent on two staff members for showers, had not received a shower or shaving assistance since admission. Observations revealed the resident's hair was uncombed and oily, and he had several days' growth of facial hair. Documentation showed that showers were scheduled for specific days, but there was no evidence that these were provided as required, and the first documented shower occurred only after the surveyor's observation. Another resident, assessed as requiring partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene and having severe cognitive impairment, was observed with significant facial hair and stated he needed to shave. Although the resident was shaved the following day, the shave was incomplete, leaving whiskers in several areas. Both cases were reviewed with facility leadership, confirming the lack of adequate ADL assistance for these dependent residents.
Failure to Maintain Safe Environment and Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Surveyors observed that the environment contained hazards that could lead to resident accidents, and staff did not implement sufficient measures to monitor or protect residents from these risks. This deficiency was identified based on direct observations and findings during the survey, which indicated lapses in maintaining a safe environment and in providing necessary supervision to prevent accidents.
Facility Fails to Address Leaking Roof in Main Hallway
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate maintenance services to maintain an orderly environment in a main hallway, impacting Resident 29. Observations revealed a leaking roof in the hallway near the beauty shop, with water dripping through ceiling tiles onto the carpet. Two large trash cans were placed under the leak to catch the water, but the surrounding carpet was wet, and a musty odor was present. Interviews with Resident 29's family and the director of maintenance confirmed the ongoing issue, with the director noting the leak had persisted since his employment began in January 2024. A quote to fix the leak was obtained in May 2024, but the facility had delayed addressing the issue. The administrator confirmed these findings and acknowledged efforts to resolve the problem.
Deficiencies in Care for Residents with Cardiac Pacemakers and Central Venous Catheters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the highest practicable care for residents with cardiac pacemakers and central venous catheters. For Resident 27, the facility did not have a care plan that included instructions to avoid using the right arm for venipuncture or blood pressure assessments, nor did it have emergency procedures in place for potential complications with the PICC line. The facility also lacked a policy or procedure for emergency care related to PICC lines, and there was no signage or indication of restrictions or emergency procedures in Resident 27's room. Resident 61, who had a cardiac pacemaker, did not have a care plan that included the use of a pacemaker check machine. The facility did not contact the resident's primary care physician or cardiologist to determine if remote monitoring was required while the resident was in the facility. Additionally, the facility staff did not inquire if the resident used a pacemaker check machine at home, and there was no pacemaker check device available in the resident's room. For Resident 82, the facility did not have emergency procedures in place for the IJ CVC, and there was no mention of the IJ CVC on the Kardex used by nurse aides. The facility also failed to document a dressing change for the IJ CVC, which was performed without a physician's order. The education provided to staff did not address emergency measures or ongoing assessments necessary for residents with a CVC, and there was no evidence that staff were measuring exposed tubing to verify that there was no migration of the access tubing.
Sanitation Deficiencies in Kitchen Storage and Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in its main kitchen, as observed during an initial tour with the General Dietary Manager. Several issues were identified, including a large circulating fan in the dishwashing area with a significant build-up of dust on the protective guards. In the dry storage room, an open container of peanut butter was found without an open date. In the walk-in freezer, a package of croissants was open and uncovered, exposing them to ambient air. Further observations in the walk-in cooler revealed a head of celery and several packages of butter that were either open or partially open, with some lacking open dates. Additionally, an open package of mixed vegetables had a build-up of moisture and no open date, and onions with expired facility use-by dates were found. Another walk-in cooler contained a container of heavy cream, a box of cooked chicken, and an opened package of provolone cheese, all with expired facility use-by dates. Two stainless steel shelves had a build-up of debris and dust, with one shelf containing a dead winged insect. A knife rack and the wall section behind it also had a build-up of dust.
Inconsistent Advance Directive Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish clear and consistent resident wishes regarding advance directives for one resident. A clinical record review for the resident revealed a current physician's order indicating a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) code status. However, a facility form titled 'Decision of Agent, Guardian, or Health Care Representative Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Status of Incompetent Resident' showed that the resident's health care agent did not wish to decide on the CPR status at that time. This discrepancy between the physician's order and the resident's code status form was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator during an interview.
Failure to Maintain Resident's Ambulation Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident's ambulation status, specifically for Resident 17, who was part of a restorative program aimed at improving her ability to ambulate with a front-wheeled walker. The program required the resident to be ambulated in straight paths with the assistance of one staff member, while another staff member followed with a wheelchair. The task was scheduled to be completed every shift to ensure it was done at least once a day. However, documentation revealed that the task was not completed on several days, specifically on September 16, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25, 2024. On these dates, the resident refused the task during the day shift, and the evening shift marked the task as not applicable, with no further explanation provided. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation was for the task to be completed once a day, and it was scheduled every shift to provide flexibility in case one shift could not complete it. Despite this, there was no documentation indicating that the resident's plan was reviewed in light of her refusals or why the task was deemed not applicable during the evening shifts. The lack of documentation and follow-up on the resident's refusals and the task's applicability contributed to the facility's failure to provide the necessary care to maintain the resident's ambulation status.
Improper Use of Positional Device for Resident with Contractures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to appropriately use a positional device for a resident with contractures, leading to a deficiency. Observations revealed that the resident was using a travel neck pillow incorrectly, with the bulk of the pillow positioned directly behind her neck, pushing it further forward. This was observed on two separate occasions. The resident's clinical record did not document the use of the travel neck pillow until after the surveyor's observations, indicating a lack of proper documentation and guidance for staff on its use. Interviews with staff, including an occupational therapist and a nurse aide, confirmed the improper use of the travel pillow. The occupational therapist indicated that the pillow should be positioned to the left side of the resident's neck for support, but there was no documentation to instruct staff on this positioning. Additionally, the nurse aide admitted to placing the pillow directly behind the resident's neck and moving it when assisting with feeding, yet there was no documented evidence to guide this practice. The lack of documentation and staff instruction contributed to the deficiency in providing appropriate care for the resident's range of motion limitations.
Deficiency in Timely Access to Resident Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely access to a complete medical record for one of the residents during a survey. On the first day of the onsite survey, the surveyor, along with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Assistant Director of Nursing, discovered that the electronic medical record for a resident did not include all physician orders, specifically missing medications and advance care planning decisions. Despite the Nursing Home Administrator's assurance that the information technology department had updated the surveyor's profile to allow full access, the surveyor was unable to access the complete records on the first and second days of the survey. The issue persisted into the third day of the survey, with the surveyor repeatedly addressing the inaccessibility problem with the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, and other staff members. It was only after further intervention by the facility's information technology department that the surveyor's user profile was adjusted to permit access to the resident's complete electronic medical record. This delay in providing access to the necessary medical records impeded the survey process, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's ability to ensure timely access to resident information.
Failure to Offer COVID-19 Vaccine to Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to offer the COVID-19 vaccine to a resident, identified as Resident 59, as required by current CDC guidelines. These guidelines recommend that everyone aged six months and older should receive the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine to maintain up-to-date protection. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on August 19, 2022, and received his most recent COVID-19 booster on February 14, 2023. However, there was no evidence in his medical records that the facility offered any additional doses of the COVID-19 vaccine after this date. Interviews with several staff members, including a registered nurse/infection control prevention coordinator, a licensed practical nurse, a registered nurse, and a medical records employee, confirmed that Resident 59's electronic and physical medical records did not indicate any offer of a COVID-19 booster in 2024. Additionally, there was no documentation of refusal by Resident 59 or his responsible party that would prevent further vaccination. The deficiency was discussed with the Nursing Home Administrator during the survey process.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 317 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lewisburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo Valley Lutheran Villag | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Milton Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 4.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Nottingham Village | 7.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Watsontown Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 8.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
| Sunbury Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 10.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Oak Glen Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.