Maple Farm

604 Oak Street, Akron, Pennsylvania 17501

46 certified beds · ≈ 43 residents/day · Non profit - Corporation · Last survey May 2025 · Provider #396128

CMS FIVE-STAR RATINGS
5/ 5 overall

Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.

Health inspections 4/5
Staffing 5/5
Quality measures 4/5
COMPLIANCE AT A GLANCE
Citations, last 12 months
0
100% below the Pennsylvania average of 10.9
Serious citations (J–L)
0
no immediate jeopardy–level findings
Fines on record
None
civil monetary penalties
Survey window open

A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026

15 of ~15 typical months since the last standard survey (May 2025)
May 2025 · on cycle Window opens Apr 2026 → ~Aug 2026

Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.

Citation history

Health deficiencies cited at Maple Farm during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.

0 in the last 12 months8 all-time 13 inspections on file
Failure to Obtain and Document Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medications
E
F0552 F552: Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Short Summary

Three residents with complex neuropsychiatric and medical conditions were prescribed new antipsychotic and antidepressant medications without documented evidence that the risks and benefits were discussed or that informed consent was obtained from the residents or their representatives. The facility lacked a formal process and documentation for obtaining consent at the time of medication initiation.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Provide Required Appeals and Ombudsman Notification During Hospital Transfer
D
F0628 F628: Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Short Summary

A resident with age-related macular degeneration and muscle weakness was transferred to the hospital without receiving written notice of appeal rights or contact information for the appeals entity and State LTC Ombudsman. The facility also failed to notify the Ombudsman of the hospital transfer, as required, and only included residents not returning to the facility in their notifications.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident with Vision Impairment
D
F0656 F656: Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Short Summary

A resident with age-related macular degeneration and muscle weakness did not have a care plan addressing vision issues or related treatments, despite documented physician orders and eye consults. Facility policy requires comprehensive care plans for all identified needs, but this was not followed for the resident.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Properly Label and Administer Tube Feedings as Ordered
D
F0693 F693: Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Short Summary

A resident with multiple complex medical conditions received tube feedings that were not properly labeled or date marked, and the total volume administered was often less than the physician-ordered amount without documented reasons. Staff confirmed that labeling was required but not consistently done, and progress notes did not explain missed volumes, resulting in a deficiency related to enteral feeding care.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across Pennsylvania

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in Pennsylvania — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

What surveyors are citing around you — mapped

In the Assessment

All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence

Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.

assistocare.com/survey-prep
Risk areas — ranked
1F689Accident hazards & supervision82
2F880Infection prevention & control74
3F812Food safety & sanitation61
4F656Comprehensive care plans49

Illustrative

In the Assessment

What surveyors actually found near you

We read the 287 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.

assistocare.com/survey-prep
Findings near you
Gulf Coast Village · 1.6 mi F689J

Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.

Cypress Cove · 4.2 mi F812D

Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.

Illustrative

In the Assessment

A prioritized, do-first checklist

Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.

assistocare.com/survey-prep
Self-audit checklist — do-first orderPer risk area
Walk supervision coverage on the memory-care unit at shift changeDo first
Audit fall-risk care plans for residents flagged high-riskF689
Verify kitchen temperature logs for the last 30 daysF812

Illustrative

$129 Built specifically for Maple Farm from its own record and your local survey environment. 100% money-back within 48 hours. Get the full Assessment

Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.

Nursing homes near Akron

How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.

Facility Distance Overall rating Citations, 12 mo Serious (J–L)
Ephrata Manor 2 mi ★★★★ 1 0
Fairmount Homes 3.4 mi ★★★★★ 0 0
Landis Homes 4.4 mi ★★★★★ 1 0
Luther Acres Manor 4.5 mi ★★★★★ 2 0
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Lititz 5.3 mi ★★★★ 4 0
Survey Readiness Assessment

Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns

Built specifically for Maple Farm.
100% money-back within 48 hours.

Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙