Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Holy Family Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including anxiety, CHF, migraine, and chronic pain syndrome, had a physician order allowing alcoholic beverages at activities or special occasions, but the order did not specify the type, amount, or frequency of alcohol allowed. The resident was also prescribed several medications, including tramadol, pregabalin, duloxetine, acetaminophen, apixaban, rimegepant, and Protonix. The DON stated the alcohol-related orders were not clarified to document those parameters.
A resident with anemia, chronic pain, diabetes, osteoarthritis, and depression had a significant 12.04-pound weight loss between weekly weights. The record did not show a timely re-weight to verify the discrepancy, and the re-weight was completed 5 days later. The RD confirmed that a 5-pound-or-more discrepancy requires a nursing re-weight.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions, non‑ambulatory and cognitively intact, was transported by facility wheelchair van for a family outing. On both the outbound and return trips, the resident reported slipping in the wheelchair despite the van driver securing the wheelchair to floor anchors and applying the van seat belt. During the return trip, after the resident again reported feeling loose, the resident slid forward under the seat belt and off the wheelchair while the van was in traffic. The driver and the resident’s daughter were unable to lift the resident back into the chair and returned to the facility, where an RN found the resident on the van floor with legs beneath the body. The resident was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a left distal femur fracture and a right distal tibial fracture. In interviews, facility leadership confirmed that the van driver had not properly secured the resident in the wheelchair, failing to belt under the wheelchair arms to maintain maximum securement.
A resident experienced an unwitnessed fall, and when surveyors requested the fall investigation report, the DON was unable to locate the original document. Instead, the DON recreated the report on a new form dated months after the event, resulting in incomplete medical records for the resident.
Unclear physician order for resident alcohol consumption
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to clarify a physician’s order related to a resident’s alcohol consumption for one resident reviewed. The facility policy on Alcohol Beverage Consumption stated that, upon admission, a licensed nurse would review the resident’s medications and diagnoses with the resident’s physician, and the physician would determine whether the resident’s medications or health status had any interaction or adverse effects with alcoholic beverages. The policy also described a two-glass limit for residents participating in activities or special occasion events and listed specific alcohol amounts by type. The resident’s clinical record showed diagnoses including anxiety, anemia, congestive heart failure, foot pain, hyperlipidemia, migraine, and chronic pain syndrome. A physician order dated May 16, 2019, and continued monthly thereafter stated that the resident could have alcoholic beverages at activities or special occasions, but the order did not include parameters for the type of alcohol or the amount that could be consumed in a specified period of time. The resident’s medication list included tramadol, pregabalin, duloxetine, acetaminophen, apixaban, rimegepant, and Protonix. During interview, the DON stated that physician orders for alcohol consumption were not clarified to document the amount, type, and frequency of alcohol consumption.
Delayed Re-Weight After Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a re-weight was completed in a timely manner after a resident had a significant weight loss. Review of the facility policy indicated that the physician, dietician, and MDS Assessment Coordinator are to be notified of monthly weight results as indicated in physician orders, and that labs may be recommended for significant weight loss to assess for indicators of malnutrition. The resident’s clinical record showed diagnoses of anemia, chronic pain, diabetes, osteoarthritis, and depression. The resident’s weight record showed a weight of 168.6 pounds on October 17, 2025 and 148.8 pounds on October 24, 2025, a loss of 12.04 pounds. The record did not show evidence that a re-weight was completed promptly to verify the accuracy of the weight loss, and the re-weight was not completed until 5 days later on October 29, 2025. During interview, the clinical dietician confirmed the 12.04-pound significant weight loss and stated that a weight discrepancy of 5 pounds or more from a resident’s most recent weight requires a re-weight by nursing staff.
Resident Not Properly Secured in Transport Van, Resulting in Fractures
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident was adequately secured in a transportation van, resulting in the resident sliding out of the wheelchair and sustaining fractures. The facility’s wheelchair transport policy, revised in June 2025, addressed moving residents who cannot transfer without assistance to meet their physical, social, psychological, or spiritual needs, but the report does not describe specific procedural steps from that policy being followed at the time of the incident. The resident involved was an 85‑year‑old, cognitively intact individual (BIMS 15), non‑ambulatory for seven years, requiring a mechanical sit‑to‑stand lift for transfers, and admitted with multiple diagnoses including chronic pain, macular drusen, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, and edema. These conditions made the resident dependent on staff for safe mobility and transport. On the day of the incident, the resident went out with family for a birthday celebration using a facility wheelchair van. The van driver reported that at approximately 2 p.m. he picked up the resident and the resident’s daughter, secured the wheelchair to the four floor anchor points, and applied the van’s seat belt, with the daughter seated in the back passenger seat. About 15 minutes into that outbound trip, the resident reported slipping; the driver stopped and readjusted the seat belt, and the resident attributed the slipping to pants material and the wheelchair cushion. The remainder of the outbound trip was completed without further reported issues. Later that evening, the driver returned to pick up the resident and daughter, again wheeled the resident into the van, and strapped the resident in as he stated he had done earlier. During the return trip, within a few minutes of departure, the resident again reported feeling loose or slipping. According to the driver, he told the resident he would stop to readjust the belt, and the resident said to keep going; the daughter asked if the resident was sure, and the resident again affirmed. The driver stated he was driving at or below the speed limit in heavy traffic. Shortly thereafter, the resident reported slipping again; when the driver stopped and opened the door, he found the resident sitting on the wheelchair footrest. The driver and the daughter attempted but were unable to lift the resident back into the chair. The daughter then requested that they return to the facility. The resident and daughter both reported that the resident slid down from the wheelchair during the ride, with the daughter stating that on the return trip she believed the resident had been strapped in the same way as on the way over, but a few minutes into the ride the resident began to feel loose and then slid down off the chair while the van was going through a busy intersection. Upon arrival at the facility entrance, the supervising RN found the resident on the floor of the handicap van, half sitting and half lying, with legs beneath the body, having slid out of the wheelchair during the ride. The RN documented that the resident had been secured with the van seat belt in a transport wheelchair that was itself secured to the van floor with four straps, and that the daughter had tried but was unable to prevent the resident from sliding out. The RN was unable to complete a thorough assessment or obtain vital signs due to the resident’s position in the van, and 911 was called immediately. Hospital records documented a left periprosthetic distal femur fracture and a right distal tibial shaft fracture resulting from slipping forward under the wheelchair seat belt. In interviews, the DON and Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility determined, after having the van driver demonstrate the belting method, that the driver did not properly secure the resident in the transportation van by failing to ensure the wheelchair was properly belted under the arms of the wheelchair to obtain and maintain maximum securement. The total driving distance from the outing location back to the facility was approximately 5.4 miles, with an estimated driving time of 19 minutes. During interviews, facility leadership acknowledged that the van used was a facility transport van and that the resident was in a standard wheelchair. The DON stated that the van driver had fastened the resident’s seat belt and that, based on the facility’s review, the method used did not provide maximum securement. The Director of Maintenance described his role in evaluating the vans and training staff on securing residents, including the use of existing cross‑strap seat belts and the need for additional lap belts for certain wheelchair configurations, but these details were provided in the context of his general responsibilities and not as actions taken before the incident. Overall, the report establishes that the resident was not adequately secured in the transportation van, leading to the resident sliding out of the wheelchair and sustaining significant fractures requiring hospital transfer and surgery.
Incomplete Medical Record Following Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one resident following an unwitnessed fall. Specifically, after a resident experienced an unwitnessed fall, surveyors requested the fall investigation report from the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON was unable to locate the original report and instead recreated the documentation on a new form, which was dated several months after the incident. The DON confirmed that the original document could not be found, resulting in incomplete records for the resident involved in the fall. This deficiency was identified through clinical record review and staff interviews, and it was determined that the facility did not adhere to accepted professional standards for maintaining resident medical records as required by state regulations.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,821 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 24 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Philadelphia
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
| West Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| University City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Care Pavilion Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 51 | 0 |
| Rittenhouse Post Acute | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Holy Family Home.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.