Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Garden Spring Rehab And Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to implement discharge planning before a resident’s discharge. A resident with rhabdomyolysis, severe frostbite with foot necrosis, and a skin infection was discharged after the physician noted outpatient surgery was delayed and hospital re-evaluation was needed. The record showed medication education and transport by ambulance, but SS, the resident’s representative, and the Administrator all indicated the representative was not informed, the resident’s belongings remained at the facility, and no home care or wound care services had been arranged.
A resident was discharged to the hospital after a change in condition, but the facility did not complete the required written discharge notice. The record lacked documentation that the resident or the resident’s representative was told the discharge date, reason, destination, appeal rights, Ombudsman information, or other required agency information, and the resident’s representative stated she was not aware of the discharge. The Administrator confirmed the discharge notification was not completed.
A resident with Parkinson’s disease, dementia, cognitive impairment, and on hospice services, who exhibited yelling behaviors, had an Ativan order changed from PRN use to a scheduled six-times-daily regimen for anxiety. There was no documentation that the responsible party was informed of this change in treatment, and the DON confirmed that notification did not occur in a timely manner, resulting in a deficiency related to required nursing services and responsible party notification.
An LPN used a blood glucose meter for multiple residents with diabetes, hepatitis C, and HIV, cleaning the device only with 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes instead of the required EPA-registered germicidal wipes. The correct disinfectant was not available on the medication cart, and staff confirmed this practice, which did not follow facility policy or manufacturer instructions. This failure led to Immediate Jeopardy due to the increased risk of transmitting bloodborne pathogens.
Surveyors observed multiple deficiencies including dirty linens, unsecured oxygen tanks, and unsanitary conditions such as a black substance on an air conditioning unit and a commode chair with a dirt ring. Staff failed to address these issues during their rounds, and a resident reported ongoing problems with cleanliness and linen changes.
Two residents who required staff assistance for ADLs, including personal hygiene and grooming, were observed with long, dirty fingernails and lacked documented evidence of receiving necessary nail care. One resident, dependent due to severe physical limitations, and another with a tracheostomy and upper extremity weakness, both needed help with nail care, which was not provided as required.
A resident with a feeding tube and a history of stroke and dysphagia did not receive the full amount of water flush ordered by the physician. The water flush pump was set to deliver 660 ml per day instead of the prescribed 800 ml, as confirmed by an LPN and the DON.
A resident with severe immobility and communication impairment, identified as at risk for pressure ulcers, was observed in bed without the prescribed cushioned heel boots or heel elevation. The DON confirmed the omission of this required intervention.
A resident with a tracheostomy and feeding tube, requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions, received tracheostomy suctioning from an LPN who wore only gloves and not a gown, contrary to facility policy and posted instructions. The DON confirmed that both gown and gloves should have been used during this high-contact care activity.
The facility did not meet the required NA to resident ratios on two occasions. During a day shift, the ratio of one NA per ten residents was not maintained, and during a night shift, the ratio of one NA per 15 residents was not met. These deficiencies were identified through a review of nursing schedules.
The facility did not meet the required 3.2 hours of direct resident care per resident on three occasions, providing only 3.19, 3.17, and 2.89 hours on specific days.
The facility did not follow its policy to conduct pre-employment background checks for a newly hired RN. The checks, including license verification and a criminal background check, were completed two months after the RN began working. This was confirmed by the Administrator, who acknowledged the lack of documentation for these checks prior to employment.
A facility failed to follow physician's orders for a resident with hypotension, administering midodrine despite the resident's systolic blood pressure exceeding the prescribed limit. The medication was given 17 times in September and six times in October 2024, contrary to the physician's directive. The DON confirmed the error, highlighting a lapse in adhering to medical orders.
The facility failed to provide written notification to residents and their representatives about hospital transfers, including reasons for the moves and Ombudsman information. This deficiency was identified for five residents who were transferred due to changes in condition, with no documentation supporting that they or their representatives received the required information. The Administrator confirmed the lack of written notices during an interview.
The facility failed to prevent and manage pressure ulcers for three residents, as staff did not consistently reposition them or conduct weekly skin assessments. One resident with protein calorie malnutrition and hemiplegia had stage four and three pressure ulcers, with lapses in repositioning and incontinence checks. Another resident with an unstageable heel ulcer did not have a prescribed heel boot applied, and a third resident with multiple sclerosis was not repositioned as required. The DON confirmed the lack of documented skin assessments.
A facility failed to administer medications as ordered for a resident with diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux disease, pain, and neuropathy. Physician's orders required the administration of Acetaminophen, gabapentin, and omeprazole at 6:00 a.m. daily, but there was no evidence of administration on a specific day. This was confirmed by the DON.
A facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent due to late administration of medications by an LPN. Medications for two residents with various diagnoses were administered significantly later than the prescribed time, resulting in a 35.7% error rate. The DON confirmed the medications should have been administered by the correct time.
The facility did not ensure call bell access for two residents, one with Alzheimer's and another with hemiplegia, both dependent on staff and at risk for falls. The call bells were found out of reach, contrary to care plans.
A resident with Alzheimer's and mobility issues was found in bed without prescribed fall prevention measures, such as floor mats and a low bed position, indicating a failure to follow the care plan.
The facility failed to provide written notice to residents and their representatives before making room changes, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified for four residents, who were moved to different rooms without receiving the necessary advance written notice that included the reason for the change. Clinical record reviews and interviews confirmed the lack of notification, violating residents' rights.
The facility failed to post accurate and current nurse staffing information. During a tour, it was observed that the staffing information posted in the lobby was outdated. The DON confirmed the posted data was incorrect.
Failure to Implement Discharge Planning Before Resident Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to demonstrate that one resident’s discharge was appropriate and that a discharge plan was implemented before the resident left the facility. Facility policy required that when a discharge to a private residence is anticipated, the interdisciplinary team develop a post-discharge plan with the resident and representative, including living arrangements, aftercare and services, discharge goals, support during transition, and factors that could make the resident vulnerable to readmission. Resident 1 was admitted with rhabdomyolysis, frostbite with tissue necrosis of the foot, and a skin infection. The MDS showed the resident was alert, needed assistance with ADLs, and was at risk for pressure ulcers, and the care plan identified pain related to a foot infection. The physician discharge summary stated the resident had been planned for outpatient surgical intervention on the foot, but no appointments were available and the delay was not advised because of the level of necrosis/ischemia from severe frostbite, so the physician requested hospital re-evaluation. The record also noted the resident wanted to proceed with whatever intervention could be done for his feet. On the day of discharge, nursing documented that the resident was discharged via ambulance, received medication education, and was told to follow up with a PCP, with medications, prescriptions, and belongings sent with him. However, the Social Services Director stated she was unaware the resident had been discharged, the resident’s mother later called for help obtaining home care, the Administrator stated the resident’s representative was not informed and the resident’s belongings were still at the facility, and the representative stated she was not told of the discharge and that no home care or wound care services had been arranged.
Failure to Provide Required Discharge Notification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required written discharge notification information for Resident 1 when the resident was discharged to the hospital on April 15, 2026, after a change in condition. The record contained no documented evidence that the resident and the resident’s responsible party or legal representative were informed of the date of discharge, the reason for discharge, the location to which the resident was discharged, appeal rights, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman information, or agency information related to protection of individuals with a mental disorder. The record also did not show that copies of the written transfer notice were provided to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. During a phone interview on May 6, 2026, the resident’s representative stated she was not made aware that the resident had been discharged from the facility, and the Administrator later confirmed that the discharge notification was not completed.
Failure to Notify Responsible Party of Change in Anti-Anxiety Medication Regimen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident’s responsible party of a significant change in treatment when a physician altered the dosing schedule of an anti-anxiety medication. The resident had Parkinson’s disease, dementia, cognitive impairment, and was receiving hospice services, with a care plan noting behaviors of yelling out at times. On April 8, 2026, the physician changed the order for Ativan from as-needed administration to a scheduled regimen of six times a day for anxiety. Clinical record review showed no documented evidence that the responsible party was informed of this change in medication frequency, and in an interview on April 15, 2026, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the responsible party had not been notified in a timely manner, constituting noncompliance with 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) regarding nursing services.
Failure to Properly Disinfect Blood Glucose Meter Between Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement proper infection control procedures regarding the use and disinfection of a multi-use blood glucose meter (BGM) for four residents who required fingerstick blood glucose testing. Facility policy and the manufacturer's instructions required that blood glucose meters intended for reuse be cleaned and disinfected between resident uses with an EPA-registered disinfectant detergent or germicide wipe. However, observations revealed that an LPN used only 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes to clean the blood glucose meter before and after each use, rather than the required EPA-registered germicidal wipes. The medication cart used by the LPN did not contain the appropriate disinfectant wipes as specified by the manufacturer and facility policy. Clinical record reviews showed that the affected residents had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, viral hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), all of which can be transmitted via bodily fluids. Orders for these residents required frequent blood glucose monitoring and insulin administration based on sliding scale protocols. The LPN confirmed that the same blood glucose meter was used for multiple residents, and that only alcohol wipes were used for cleaning between uses, contrary to both policy and manufacturer instructions. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and Infection Preventionist, confirmed that the expectation was to use EPA-registered germicidal wipes for disinfecting blood glucose meters. The failure to follow these procedures was observed directly by surveyors and acknowledged by staff, resulting in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy due to the increased likelihood of transmitting bloodborne pathogens between residents.
Removal Plan
- LPN 1 was removed from schedule immediately and will not be returning to the facility.
- Director of central supplies ensured that each of the eight medication carts had the disinfecting agents that meet the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered cleaning products as noted in the manufacturer's instructions.
- All nurses will be educated on the Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level, policy and procedure. In addition, they will be educated on the necessity of using the approved EPA registered germicidal wipe as required in the manufacturer's instructions and where to obtain them. Education provided by the DON/designee. No licensed nurse will be permitted to begin their shift until they have been educated on the proper use and disinfection of the glucometer.
- Newly hired licensed nurses will be educated at orientation on the Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level, policy and procedure using the approved EPA registered germicidal wipe requirements as noted in the manufacturer's instructions. All agency licensed nurses will be educated before they begin their first shift in the facility.
- Central supply department received education regarding ensuring that the EPA germicidal wipes are in the carts.
- DON/designee will complete random glucometer cleaning and disinfecting observation audits daily for seven days plus weekly for four weeks and monthly for three months ensuring education has been effective.
- DON/designee will be monitoring steps of the action plan for continued compliance.
- Central supply/designee will monitor ensuring the EPA germicidal wipes are in the carts.
- Audits will be brought to QA&A for review and recommendations.
- QAPI committee will determine the need for further audits.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Sanitary Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff on both nursing units that were toured. Observations included an air conditioning unit covered in a black substance, a large brown stain on a fitted sheet, and pillows without case covers in a resident's room. A resident reported that his linens were dirty and that the air conditioner had the black substance on it, and staff provided new pillowcases but did not change the dirty sheet or address the air conditioner. Additionally, an uncapped 50 milliliter syringe was found lying on a resident's bed while tube feeding was infusing, and staff did not remove it during their visit. Further observations revealed worn fitted sheets and unsecured oxygen tanks in resident rooms, contrary to the facility's policy requiring oxygen cylinders to be secured to prevent tipping. In the shower room, a commode chair had a black dirt ring, wash cloths were left on grab bars, a thermometer was covered in a dried black substance, and the shower curtain had gray stains. The administrator confirmed that these environmental issues should have been addressed.
Failure to Provide Adequate Grooming and Hygiene Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate grooming and hygiene services for two residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). One resident, with diagnoses including aphasia, hypertension, and severe physical limitations, was assessed as dependent on staff for personal hygiene, grooming, and bathing. Observation revealed this resident in bed with long, dirty fingernails, and there was no documentation that staff had assisted with nail care. Another resident, who had a tracheostomy, heart failure, and upper extremity weakness, was also assessed as needing staff assistance for personal hygiene, grooming, and bathing. This resident was observed in bed with long, dirty fingernails and stated he wanted his nails trimmed but needed staff help. There was no documented evidence that staff provided the necessary nail care for either resident. The Director of Nursing confirmed that nail care was expected to be performed during routine care and as needed, but records did not show that this was done for the two residents identified.
Failure to Follow Physician's Order for Feeding Tube Water Flush
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to implement a physician's order for a resident with a history of stroke, dysphagia, and a feeding tube. The physician's order specified that the resident's feeding tube should be flushed with 200 ml of water every six hours, totaling 800 ml daily. However, observation revealed that the water flush was being administered via a pump set at 30 ml per hour for 22 hours, resulting in only 660 ml of water being delivered per day, which is 140 ml less than ordered. Interviews with an LPN and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the pump was not programmed to deliver the total amount of water as prescribed by the physician.
Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with diagnoses including aphasia, hypertension, severe physical limitations, and immobility was not provided with required interventions to prevent pressure ulcers. The resident was assessed as being at risk for pressure ulcers and unable to communicate needs. The care plan specified that cushioned heel boots should be applied to both feet while the resident was in bed to protect skin integrity. However, during multiple observations, the resident was found in bed without the heel boots in place and with heels not elevated. The DON confirmed that the resident should have had the heel boots on while in bed.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Tracheostomy Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its own infection prevention and control policies regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with a tracheostomy and feeding tube. According to the facility's policy, staff are required to wear both a gown and gloves during high-contact care activities, such as tracheostomy care, for residents with indwelling medical devices. Clinical record review and the resident's care plan confirmed the need for these precautions. However, during an observation, an LPN performed tracheostomy suctioning for the resident while only wearing gloves and not a gown, despite signage outside the room instructing staff to use both. The Director of Nursing later confirmed that a gown should have been worn during this care activity.
Non-compliance with Nurse Aide Staffing Ratios
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the required nurse aide (NA) to resident ratios on two separate occasions within a 21-day review period. On January 19, 2025, during the day shift from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., the facility did not maintain the minimum ratio of one NA per ten residents. Additionally, on January 17, 2025, during the night shift from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., the facility did not meet the required ratio of one NA per 15 residents. These deficiencies were identified through a review of the nursing schedules for the specified period.
Plan Of Correction
1. The facility is unable to retroactively correct the CNA hours for the dates mentioned. 2. The facility will schedule CNA's to meet the ratio of 1 CNA to 10 residents for 7a - 3p shifts, and 1 CNA to 15 residents on 11pm - 7am. Call outs will be monitored by NHA/DON and/or designee. 3. NHA or designee will educate the scheduling coordinator on the state ratio requirements. The ratios will be monitored weekly x4 weeks. 4. Findings will be summarized and brought to the quality assurance and performance improvement committee and reviewed for any further monitoring or changes needed. 5. Date of compliance: 2/20/25
Failure to Meet Minimum Nursing Care Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the regulatory requirement of providing a minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care per resident in a 24-hour period. This deficiency was identified during a review of nursing schedules over a 21-day period from January 3 to January 23, 2025. Specifically, on three days—January 5, January 17, and January 19, 2025—the facility provided less than the required hours of care, with 3.19, 3.17, and 2.89 care hours per resident, respectively.
Plan Of Correction
1. The facility is unable to retroactively correct the state general nursing hours for the dates mentioned. 2. The facility will schedule CNA's, LPNs, and RNs to meet state general nursing hours of 3.2 hours of direct care. Call outs will be monitored by NHA/DON and/or designee. 3. NHA or designee will educate the scheduling coordinator on the state general nursing hour requirements. The daily general staffing hours will be monitored weekly x4 weeks. 4. Findings will be summarized and brought to the quality assurance and performance improvement committee and reviewed for any further monitoring or changes needed. 5. Date of compliance 2/20/25
Failure to Conduct Pre-Employment Background Checks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy on conducting background screening investigations for new hires. Specifically, the facility did not verify the professional license and complete a criminal background check for a newly hired Registered Nurse, identified as Employee 5 (E5), before their employment began. E5 started working on August 16, 2024, but the required checks were not completed until October 16, 2024. This oversight was confirmed by the Administrator during an interview on October 18, 2024, who acknowledged the absence of documented evidence for the license verification and background check prior to E5's employment, as mandated by the facility's policy dated October 23, 2023.
Failure to Adhere to Physician's Orders for Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented correctly for one of the 26 sampled residents, identified as Resident 65. The resident had a diagnosis of hypotension and was prescribed midodrine to be administered three times a day, with the condition that it should not be given if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) exceeded 120 mm Hg. However, a review of the medication administration records showed that the medication was administered 17 times in September and six times in October 2024, despite the resident's SBP being greater than 120 mm Hg on those occasions. The Director of Nursing confirmed in an interview that the medication was administered outside the established parameters for Resident 65, indicating a failure to adhere to the physician's orders. This deficiency was cited under CFR 483.25 Quality of Care and had been previously cited on November 16, 2023, under 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Failure to Notify Residents of Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely written notification to residents and their representatives regarding transfers to the hospital. This deficiency was identified through clinical record reviews and staff interviews, which revealed that five residents were transferred to the hospital due to changes in their conditions without receiving the required written information. Specifically, there was no documentation to support that Residents 41, 48, 50, 81, and 117, or their responsible parties, were informed in writing about the transfers, the reasons for the moves, or provided with Ombudsman information. The deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Administrator, who acknowledged that the residents or their representatives were not given written notices regarding their transfers. The lack of documentation and communication regarding these transfers indicates a failure to comply with the requirement to notify residents and their representatives in writing, including providing information about appeal rights and Ombudsman contact details.
Failure to Prevent and Manage Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement necessary interventions to prevent the development or worsening of pressure ulcers for three residents with skin impairments. Resident 1, diagnosed with protein calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, and hemiplegia, had a stage four pressure ulcer on the sacrum and a stage three ulcer on the left shoulder. The care plan required staff to reposition the resident every two hours and check for incontinence every hour. However, documentation showed that these interventions were not consistently performed, with significant lapses in August and September. Additionally, there was no evidence of weekly skin assessments since May 2024. Resident 2, with diagnoses including protein calorie malnutrition and anemia, had an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left heel. Despite a physician's order to apply a heel boot, observations revealed the boot was not in place during multiple checks. The LPN confirmed the oversight, and the DON acknowledged the boot should have been applied. Furthermore, no weekly skin assessments were documented since March 2024. Resident 3, suffering from multiple sclerosis and anxiety, had a stage four pressure ulcer on the sacrum and was entirely dependent on staff for mobility. The resident reported infrequent repositioning, and documentation confirmed that staff failed to reposition her every two hours on numerous occasions in September. The DON confirmed the lack of documented weekly skin assessments for all three residents.
Failure to Administer Medications as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of five sampled residents. The clinical record review revealed that the resident had diagnoses including gastroesophageal reflux disease, pain, and neuropathy. Physician's orders dated July 26, 2024, instructed staff to administer Acetaminophen and gabapentin at 6:00 a.m. daily, and an order dated July 27, 2024, directed the administration of omeprazole at the same time daily. However, there was no evidence that these medications were offered or administered on August 7, 2024, as per the physician's orders. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing during an interview on August 8, 2024.
Medication Administration Timing Error
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent on one of its nursing units. According to the facility's policy, medications should be administered within one hour of their prescribed time. However, during a medication pass observation, it was noted that an LPN administered medications significantly later than the prescribed time. Specifically, medications for two residents, who had various diagnoses including major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, depression, allergies, hypertension, and pain, were administered at 9:30 a.m. and 9:40 a.m., respectively, instead of the prescribed 8:00 a.m. The clinical record review showed that the medications for these residents were ordered to be given at 8:00 a.m. daily. The delay in administration resulted in a medication error rate of 35.7%, as there were 28 opportunities with 10 errors observed during the medication pass. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the medications should have been administered by 9:00 a.m., indicating a clear deviation from the facility's medication administration policy.
Failure to Provide Call Bell Access for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate the needs of two residents by not providing access to the call bell system. Resident 4, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, gait abnormalities, and muscle weakness, was observed in bed with the call bell wrapped around an armchair, out of reach, despite being dependent on staff for care and at risk for falls. Similarly, Resident 5, who had hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and heart failure, was found with the call bell on a dresser under stuffed animals, out of reach, while in bed and later while sitting in a wheelchair. This resident, who was alert and also dependent on staff, expressed an inability to find the call bell, highlighting the facility's failure to ensure the call bell was within reach as per the care plan.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that safety interventions for falls were in place for a resident diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. The resident was assessed as being at risk for falls and was dependent on staff for care. The care plan specified that the bed should be in a low position with floor mats on both sides while the resident was in bed. However, observations revealed that the resident was in bed without the floor mats in place, and the bed was not in a low position, indicating a failure to implement the prescribed safety measures.
Failure to Provide Written Notice for Room Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notice to residents and their representatives before making room changes, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified for four residents, who were moved to different rooms without receiving the necessary advance written notice that included the reason for the change. The facility's policy, last reviewed on October 30, 2023, mandates that such notice be given and documented in the resident's medical record. Clinical record reviews revealed that residents were moved on various dates in May and June 2024 without documented evidence of notification. Interviews with residents and the Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of notification. Specifically, Resident 9 expressed unawareness of the reasons or timing of their room change, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of documentation for the notifications. This failure to notify residents and their representatives is a violation of the residents' rights as outlined in the facility's policy and relevant state codes.
Failure to Post Accurate Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post accurate and current nurse staffing information. During a tour of the facility on February 27, 2024, at 9:15 a.m., it was observed that the staffing information posted in the lobby was dated for January 23, 2024. During an interview later that day at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the posted staffing data was incorrect.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,887 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 22 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Willow Grove
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willow Grove Post Acute | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Brookside Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Luther Woods Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Dresher Hill Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Garden Spring Rehab And Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.