Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Concordia At Spiritrust Sprenkle Drive during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder continued to receive a higher dose of haloperidol for over a month after the physician had ordered a dose reduction, due to a delay in updating the medication orders and administration records. The facility's policy lacked a specified timeframe for acting on such orders, resulting in the resident receiving the incorrect dose until the issue was identified by the consultant pharmacist.
The facility administration did not ensure annual review and approval of care policies by the administration and Medical Director. The NHA could not provide evidence of a recent review, and the last documented review was dated over a year ago. The facility lacked further evidence of a care policy review within the past year.
The facility did not submit required direct care staffing information for FY Q3 2024, as mandated by the ACA and CMS guidelines. The Nursing Home Administrator was unaware if the submission was completed by the previous administration, leading to a deficiency for failing to submit the necessary data.
The facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for several residents, as observed during meal service. A dietary employee did not complete serving one table at a time, leading to significant delays for some residents. Residents expressed concerns about the uncertainty of meal service timing, which was acknowledged by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for four residents, omitting essential interventions for conditions such as edema, cataracts, mobility issues, and dental status. This lack of documentation and planning did not meet the residents' specific medical and care needs.
The facility failed to provide timely meal assistance to residents requiring full assistance or supervision. Observations showed delays in staff attending to residents, such as a resident sitting with an untouched meal and another served while sleeping. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the expectation for timely assistance, indicating a gap in management and nursing services.
A resident with limited ROM did not receive the recommended restorative nursing program after discharge from occupational therapy. The facility failed to document or implement the prescribed active ROM exercises, leading to a deficiency in care.
The facility failed to comply with professional standards for food storage and kitchen equipment use, as observed through unlabeled, undated, or expired food items in various areas. Interviews with staff confirmed that facility expectations were not met, indicating a systemic issue with adherence to food service safety standards.
A facility failed to accurately assess a resident's dental status during admission. The resident, with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, was observed to have no natural teeth, confirmed by a physician assessment. However, the Admission MDS was incorrectly coded, not reflecting the resident's edentulous condition. This was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator and DON.
A resident with Parkinson's disease experienced a deficiency in care when the facility failed to update the care plan after removing the remote for the resident's electric recliner. The resident, unable to operate the recliner independently, had a fall, and the care plan was not revised to reflect the safety measure of removing the remote.
A facility failed to provide a prescribed nutritional supplement to a resident with dementia and diabetes, substituting it with chocolate milk, which lacked equivalent nutritional value. Additionally, the facility did not notify a physician of a significant weight loss in a resident with dysphagia and Alzheimer's, as required by their policy.
A facility failed to provide trauma-informed care to a resident with a history of childhood trauma. Despite the facility's policy requiring trauma history screening, the resident's care plan lacked documentation of trauma, and psychosocial assessments did not address trauma history. Interviews with staff revealed an inability to locate documentation of trauma assessment.
A facility failed to adhere to its infection control program when two employees did not wear gowns during high-contact care for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Despite clear signage and available PPE, the staff did not follow the protocol, as confirmed by interviews with facility leadership.
A resident with a history of hemiplegia and other conditions suffered a skin tear when a nurse aide trainee transferred them alone using a sit-to-stand lift, against facility policy requiring two-person assistance. The aide felt rushed and proceeded without help, resulting in the resident's arm hitting a door frame.
A resident with multiple health conditions suffered a skin tear during a transfer when a nurse aide trainee used a sit-to-stand lift independently, contrary to facility policy requiring two-person assistance. The aide felt rushed and did not seek additional help, leading to the resident's arm being injured against a door frame.
Delay in Implementing Psychotropic Medication Dose Reduction
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving psychotropic medication underwent a timely gradual dose reduction as ordered by the physician. The resident, who had diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder, was prescribed haloperidol 1 mg at bedtime. On July 21, 2025, the physician agreed with the consultant pharmacist's recommendation to decrease the dose to 0.5 mg at bedtime and ordered monitoring for behavioral changes for 14 days following the change. However, the physician's order to decrease the dose was not promptly reflected in the resident's current medication orders. Despite the physician's order, the resident continued to receive haloperidol 1 mg at bedtime for 35 days after the dose reduction was approved. The medication administration record confirmed that the dose was not changed to 0.5 mg until August 28, 2025. The facility's policy did not specify a timeframe for acting on physician orders, and the delay was identified by the consultant pharmacist and brought to the attention of nursing staff. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that physician orders should be acted upon in a timely manner.
Failure to Review and Approve Care Policies Annually
Penalty
Summary
The facility administration failed to ensure that care policies were reviewed and approved by the administration and Medical Director on a yearly basis. During an entrance staff interview, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was unable to provide evidence of a recent care policy review. An electronic communication from the NHA confirmed the absence of a signatory page indicating the last review date. A review of the care policy binder, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that the last documented review and approval by the NHA, DON, and Medical Director was dated March 9, 2022. As of the survey date, the facility could not provide further evidence of a care policy review within the past year.
Failure to Submit Staffing Data for FY Q3 2024
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing information for the fiscal year third quarter of 2024, as required by Section 6106 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the State Operations Manual under section 483.70(q). This requirement mandates that long-term care facilities submit complete and accurate staffing information, including agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable data in a uniform format to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The review of the CMS Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data report revealed that the facility did not submit the necessary data for the specified quarter. During a staff interview, the Nursing Home Administrator indicated that the responsibility for the submission lay with a prior administration and was uncertain whether the submission to PBJ had been completed. As of the following day, the facility had no additional information to provide regarding the submission. This lack of submission triggered a deficiency for failing to submit the required data for the quarter, as noted in the PBJ staffing data reports.
Failure to Ensure Dignified Dining Experience
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for five residents during meal service in the observed dining room. Observations revealed that the dietary employee, identified as Employee 4, did not complete serving one table at a time, resulting in some residents being served significantly later than others at the same table. For instance, Resident 35 was left without food while others at the table were served, prompting the resident to request food from Employee 4. Similarly, Resident 9, who had been waiting since 11:00 AM, expressed concern about the delay in receiving their meal. Additional observations noted that Resident 17, Resident 64, and Resident 24 also experienced delays in being served, despite their tablemates having already received their meals. These delays were confirmed through resident interviews, where concerns about the uncertainty of meal service timing were expressed. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the expectation that residents should be served with dignity during meal service, aligning with the facility's policy on resident rights.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for four residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific medical and care needs. Resident 44, diagnosed with chronic venous hypertension with ulcers and type two diabetes mellitus, had physician orders for bilateral lower extremity ace wraps and diuretics for edema, but these were not included in the comprehensive care plan. Similarly, Resident 48, who had bilateral cataracts and hypertension, required cataract surgery, yet her care plan lacked documentation of her visual function and necessary staff interventions. Resident 57, with muscle weakness and mobility issues, used bilateral enabler bars for bed mobility, but this was not documented in the care plan. Additionally, Resident 64, diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, was observed to be edentulous, but the care plan did not address his dental status. These omissions indicate a failure to update and include essential care interventions in the residents' comprehensive care plans, as required by the facility's policy.
Failure to Provide Timely Meal Assistance to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to perform activities of daily living received the necessary assistance during meal service. Observations in the dining room revealed that several residents, who required full assistance or supervision with their meals, were not promptly attended to by staff. For instance, Resident 3, who requires full assistance, was observed sitting with her meal untouched for several minutes before a registered nurse began to assist her. Similarly, Resident 11, who also requires full assistance, was served her meal while she was sleeping and did not receive help until much later. Other residents, such as Resident 27 and Resident 37, who require supervision and cueing, were not immediately assisted, leading to delays in their meal consumption. Resident 45, who requires full assistance, was observed asking for help after being served, indicating a lack of timely support. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that residents should not be served until staff are ready to assist them, highlighting a gap in the facility's management and nursing services as per the cited regulations.
Failure to Implement Restorative ROM Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with limited range of motion, as required to maintain or improve their condition. The resident, identified as having muscle weakness, abnormal gait, and mobility issues, was discharged from occupational therapy with specific recommendations for a Restorative Range of Motion Program. This program included active range of motion exercises for the bilateral upper extremities, specifically targeting the shoulders, elbows, wrists, and fingers. Despite these recommendations, a review of the resident's clinical record showed no documentation of the implementation of the restorative nursing program or the prescribed exercises. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the program was not initiated following the resident's discharge from occupational therapy, resulting in a deficiency in the care provided to the resident.
Failure to Adhere to Food Storage and Safety Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food storage and kitchen equipment utilization, as evidenced by multiple observations and policy reviews. The facility's policy on labeling and dating food products was not followed, with numerous items in the dry storage area, main kitchen, and refrigerators found unlabeled, undated, or past their use-by dates. Specific examples include undated dinner rolls, a sugar bin, and a can of pimentos, as well as moldy watermelon slices and thawed Readycare Frozen Shakes without thawed dates. Additionally, spices were labeled with incorrect use-by dates, and a test strip used for sanitizer water testing was expired. Interviews with facility staff, including the General Dietary Manager and the Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed that the facility's expectations were not met. The staff acknowledged that expired items should be discarded and that food items should be labeled and dated according to facility policy. The observations and interviews indicate a systemic failure to comply with food service safety standards, as outlined in the facility's policies and professional guidelines.
Inaccurate Dental Assessment for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately assess the dental status of a resident, identified as Resident 64, during the admission process. Resident 64, who has diagnoses including atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, was observed to have no natural teeth during an interview. A physician assessment conducted earlier confirmed that the resident was edentulous. However, the Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident 64, dated October 4, 2024, was incorrectly coded in section L - Oral/Dental Status, failing to indicate the resident's edentulous condition. This discrepancy was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing during a staff interview.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Resident with Parkinson's
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the care plan for Resident 61 was reviewed and revised appropriately. Resident 61, who has Parkinson's disease and a lack of coordination, was using an electric recliner. The facility had removed the remote control for the recliner, preventing the resident from adjusting the chair independently. This action was taken because the resident had a fall after sliding out of the recliner due to an inability to operate the remote and adjust the footrest independently. The Director of Nursing indicated that due to the resident's cognitive level, the recliner could be considered a restraint, leading to the removal of the remote. The comprehensive care plan for Resident 61 included an intervention to recline the chair and place the remote in a pouch attached to the chair. However, the care plan was not updated to reflect the removal of the remote for safety reasons. An email from the Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that the care plan should have been revised to include elevating the resident's legs as needed and removing the remote from the room. This oversight in updating the care plan contributed to the deficiency identified during the survey.
Failure to Provide Nutritional Supplements and Notify Physician of Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the physician for a resident diagnosed with dementia and type II diabetes. The physician had ordered a dietary supplement to be given three times a day between meals due to poor meal intake. However, during medication administration observations, an employee was seen substituting the prescribed nutritional shake with chocolate milk, which did not offer equivalent nutritional value. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that chocolate milk should not have been used as a substitute for the ordered supplement. Additionally, the facility did not notify the physician of a significant weight change for another resident diagnosed with dysphagia, muscle weakness, and Alzheimer's disease. The resident experienced a 5.7% weight loss over one month, and the clinical record indicated that the physician was to be notified. However, there was no documentation to confirm that the physician was informed of this weight loss, and the Nursing Home Administrator was unable to provide evidence of such notification.
Failure to Provide Trauma-Informed Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide trauma-informed and culturally competent care to a resident identified as a trauma survivor. The facility's policy on trauma-informed care, effective since November 1, 2019, requires initial screening on admission and during care plan reviews to identify any history of trauma. However, the care plan for a resident with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder did not include any notification of a history of trauma, despite the resident becoming tearful when discussing childhood trauma during an interview. The facility's psychosocial assessment document, dated December 13, 2022, did not include questions about a history of trauma, and the resident's PsychoGeriatric Services notes from May and September 2024 also lacked any mention of trauma history. Interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator and Social Services Director revealed that they could not find documentation indicating the resident was assessed for trauma history. The facility has moved away from using the form mentioned in their trauma-informed care policy, opting instead for a different psychosocial assessment form, but no further information was provided.
Inadequate Use of PPE During Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by the improper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during care for a resident on transmission-based precautions. The facility's policy on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) requires the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities to prevent the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). However, during an observation of wound care and dressing change for a resident with Parkinson's disease and muscle weakness, two employees did not wear gowns as required by the facility's policy. The resident in question had physician orders for wound care and EBP, and signage in the room indicated the need for PPE, with a caddy containing gowns and gloves available. Despite these precautions, the employees failed to don gowns during the procedure. Interviews with the involved staff and facility leadership confirmed that the expectation was for employees to wear appropriate PPE, highlighting a lapse in adherence to infection control protocols.
Neglect During Transfer Results in Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from neglect, resulting in actual harm. A nurse aide trainee, Employee 1, independently transferred a resident using a sit-to-stand lift, contrary to the facility's policy requiring two staff members for such transfers. This action led to the resident's arm being rubbed against a door frame, causing a 4.5 cm x 4 cm skin tear. The resident involved had a medical history that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The resident's care plan specified the need for a two-person assist during transfers using a sit-to-stand lift. Despite this, Employee 1 proceeded with the transfer alone after failing to find another staff member and feeling rushed by the resident. The incident was documented in the resident's nursing progress notes and a facility-reported incident. Interviews with the resident and Employee 1 confirmed that the resident questioned the need for assistance, but Employee 1 proceeded alone. The facility's investigation revealed that Employee 1 admitted to not following the care plan, leading to the resident's injury.
Inadequate Supervision During Resident Transfer Results in Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance during resident transfers, resulting in actual harm to a resident. The incident involved a resident with a history of hemiplegia, hemiparesis, congestive heart failure, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The resident was being transferred using a sit-to-stand lift by a nurse aide trainee, who acted independently without the required assistance of a second staff member. This action was contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates a two-person assist for all mechanical lift transfers. During the transfer, the resident's arm was rubbed against a door frame, causing a 4.5 cm x 4 cm skin tear. The nurse aide trainee admitted to feeling rushed and decided to proceed with the transfer alone, despite the resident questioning the need for additional help. The facility's investigation confirmed that the nurse aide trainee did not attempt to find another staff member to assist, leading to the resident's injury.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 317 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near York
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Normandie Ridge | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Margaret E. Moul Home | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Yorkview Nursing And Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Rest Haven-york | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Concordia At Spiritrust Sprenkle Drive.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.