Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Concordia At Arbutus Park during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively impaired resident with Alzheimer’s disease, care planned as a fall risk, had a wooden door lock block with a bolt-and-pin mechanism placed on her bedroom door per physician order and documentation on the TAR, preventing her from opening the door when she was out of the room. The device, supplied and modified by the resident’s son to keep her out of the room and unsupervised there, was observed to fully block door-handle use and was not easily removable. Staff, including an LPN and nurse aides, reported that the resident sometimes tried to enter her room while the block was in place and was redirected with explanations or by retrieving her personal items. The DON stated that the facility allowed this special lock to be used, which prevented the resident from accessing her room whenever she wanted, contrary to facility policy requiring support of resident rights and self-determination.
The facility did not complete required pre-employment screenings for several nursing staff, including missing nurse aide registry verification, criminal background checks, and nursing license checks with the state board, as well as lacking reference checks for some staff prior to hire, contrary to facility policy and state regulations.
A resident with COPD and end stage heart failure did not receive a prescribed Trelegy Ellipta inhaler for about two weeks due to delays in delivery and lack of follow-up by staff. The resident reported increased shortness of breath, and there was no documentation of attempts to resolve the issue with the pharmacy or physician. The DON was unaware of the missing medication until notified by pharmacy.
The facility did not ensure proper care for two residents with indwelling urinary catheters by failing to document required catheter drainage bag changes and not consistently measuring or recording urinary output as outlined in care plans and facility policy. Nursing leadership confirmed these lapses in documentation and adherence to protocol.
Surveyors found that food items in the kitchen, including pre-sliced meats, a milk shake/ice cream mix, and iced coffees, were not properly labeled, dated, or discarded according to facility policy and manufacturer guidelines. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed these items should have been handled differently.
Two nurse aides did not receive the required 12 hours of annual in-service training, as confirmed by a review of facility records and staff interviews. The facility lacked documentation to show that these nurse aides completed the mandated training in areas such as dementia care and abuse prevention.
A resident who was cognitively impaired and dependent for care experienced a coughing episode after taking medications. The physician instructed staff to monitor the resident and provide a status update the next day to decide on further treatment, but there was no documentation that the physician was contacted as requested.
A resident with Alzheimer's dementia, assessed as at moderate risk for wandering, was able to exit the facility undetected due to failures in safety protocols. The resident's care plan included a door alarm, which was not activated by the responsible LPN. Additionally, the facility failed to document monthly checks and replacement of door alarm batteries, leading to dead batteries and non-functioning alarms. The resident was found outside, indicating a significant lapse in safety measures.
The facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in a secured unit, as observed by stained and dirty carpets and the use of duct tape on thresholds to address trip hazards. The Director of Maintenance and the DON confirmed the need for carpet replacement and inappropriate use of duct tape, violating resident rights and administrative responsibilities.
The facility did not comply with food service safety standards, as expired ice cream mixes were found in the cooler, and open chicken breasts were exposed in the freezer. Additionally, there was debris on the floors of the freezer and dry storage room, and a dusty fan was blowing onto the food prep area. The Food Service Director confirmed these issues.
A resident with diabetes was allowed to self-administer insulin via a pump without an assessment to ensure her safety, as required by facility policy. Despite physician orders permitting self-administration, there was no documented evaluation of her capability, and staff noted her anxiety and confusion. The DON confirmed the lack of assessment.
The facility did not ensure that residents could file grievances anonymously, as required by their policy. Residents were unaware of how to file grievances anonymously, and the DON confirmed that grievance forms were inaccessible to residents without nurse assistance.
The facility failed to provide written notification to residents and their responsible parties regarding the reasons for hospital transfers. A resident with a history of stroke was transferred due to sepsis without written notice, and another cognitively impaired resident was transferred multiple times without written notification. This deficiency was confirmed by the Business Office Manager.
The facility failed to issue bed-hold notices for two residents transferred to the hospital. One resident, with a history of stroke, was transferred due to sepsis, while another, with cognitive impairment, was transferred multiple times for various medical issues. In both cases, no bed-hold notices were documented, as confirmed by the Business Office Manager.
A resident with diabetes and an insulin pump did not have a care plan developed to address her individualized care needs, despite physician's orders and facility policy requiring such a plan. Observations confirmed the insulin pump was functioning, but the care plan was missing, as verified by the DON.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan to address PTSD triggers, despite a psychiatry consult indicating the resident experienced PTSD symptoms from military service. The care plan lacked documentation on PTSD triggers, confirmed by the DON during an interview.
A facility failed to provide trauma-informed care for a resident with PTSD, as there was no documentation of specific triggers or measures to prevent them. The resident's care plan lacked a trauma-informed care assessment, confirmed by the DON.
A resident's biological and herbal supplements were found improperly labeled in the facility's medication refrigerator. The supplements, prepared by the resident's son, were stored in unlabeled zip-lock baggies, contrary to the facility's policy requiring proper labeling. The resident, diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, was ordered to self-administer these supplements. The issue was confirmed by an LPN and acknowledged by the DON.
A facility failed to maintain complete clinical records for a resident managing her insulin with a pump. Despite a physician's order requiring the resident to notify staff before self-administering insulin boluses, the MAR lacked documentation of the insulin amounts administered. This deficiency was confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator.
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two residents with indwelling urinary catheters, as required by infection control guidelines. Observations confirmed the absence of EBP, including necessary signage and PPE, which was acknowledged by staff.
The facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in a shower room and a resident's bathroom. Observations revealed loose toilet grab bars and rust stains with a black, removable substance around the toilet. The Director of Maintenance confirmed these conditions were not acceptable, violating the administrator's responsibility under 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a).
A resident, who was at risk for falls, was left unattended in the bathroom by a nurse aide who did not follow the care plan. This resulted in the resident falling and sustaining a nasal bone fracture and a UTI. The investigation confirmed neglect due to the failure to provide the required assistance and use of a gait belt.
A resident identified as a fall risk fell and sustained a nasal bone fracture and UTI after a nurse aide failed to follow the care plan, which required the use of a gait belt and assistance from two staff members during toileting. The nurse aide left the resident unattended, leading to the fall and injury.
A resident, who was at risk for falls, fell and sustained a nasal fracture after a nurse aide failed to use a gait belt and left the resident unattended in the bathroom. The aide did not follow the care plan, which required two-person assistance and constant supervision during toileting.
Resident’s Right to Self-Determination Violated by Door Lock Block Restricting Room Access
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident’s right to self-determination and to make choices about significant aspects of her life by restricting her access to her own room through the use of a door lock block. Facility policy on resident rights stated that residents have the right to be free from interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal in exercising their rights, and that the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination and support resident choice. Resident 2’s MDS assessment documented cognitive impairment, a diagnosis including Alzheimer’s disease, and a need for staff assistance with daily care. Her care plan identified a risk for falls or injury related to falls and included an intervention for a special lock to her bedroom door, active through early March 2026. Physician’s orders directed that a door lock block be placed on her room door when she was out of the room, and TAR documentation showed that this door lock block was used every shift over several months. Surveyor observation on April 8, 2026, showed that the door lock block was a wooden device placed over the door handle to prevent the handle from being pushed and the door from being opened, with a bolt and pin mechanism that prevented easy removal. Staff interviews revealed that the resident’s son had provided the bolt/pin lock for the wood block, believing it was an improvement, and that the device was used to prevent the resident from entering her room and being unsupervised there. Staff reported that the resident occasionally attempted to enter her room while the block was in place and was redirected by explanations such as that someone was cleaning her room or by retrieving personal items she sought. The DON acknowledged that the son insisted on keeping the resident out of her room to prevent falls and that the facility allowed the special lock to be used on the door block, which prevented the resident from accessing her room whenever she wanted, thereby failing to support her right to self-determination and access to her own room as required by resident rights regulations.
Failure to Complete Required Pre-Employment Screenings for Nursing Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its own abuse prevention policy and state regulations by not completing required pre-employment screenings for several nursing staff members. Specifically, for one nurse aide, there was no documented evidence that her standing on the Pennsylvania State Nurse Aide Registry was verified, nor were reference checks from previous or current employers obtained prior to her start date. Another nurse aide's personnel file lacked documentation of a completed criminal background check before employment. Additionally, for two registered nurses, there was no documented evidence that their licenses were checked with the Pennsylvania State Board of Nursing prior to their start dates, and for one of them, reference checks from previous employers were also missing. These deficiencies were confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, who acknowledged the absence of documentation for registry verification, licensure verification, criminal background checks, and reference checks for the mentioned nursing staff prior to their hire dates. The facility's failure to complete these required screenings is not in accordance with its abuse policy and state regulations.
Failure to Provide Ordered Inhaler Medication to Resident
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of COPD, chronic respiratory failure, end stage heart failure, and who was receiving hospice services, was admitted with physician's orders for a daily Trelegy Ellipta inhaler, to be self-administered at the bedside. During a medication administration observation, it was found that the resident did not have access to the prescribed inhaler. Staff confirmed that the inhaler had been ordered but had not yet been delivered, and the resident reported not having the medication for approximately two weeks, resulting in increased shortness of breath. Review of the Medication Administration Record showed the medication was marked for unsupervised self-administration, but there was no documentation of any follow-up with the pharmacy or physician regarding the missing medication. The DON was unaware of the issue until notified by pharmacy that the order was cancelled due to authorization and cost approval requirements. There was no evidence that the facility took timely action to ensure the resident received the prescribed medication as ordered.
Failure to Document and Provide Required Catheter Care and Output Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide proper care for residents with indwelling urinary catheters, as evidenced by a lack of documentation and adherence to care plans and facility protocols. For one resident with a Foley catheter placed due to a stage 4 pressure ulcer and urinary incontinence, the care plan required the catheter drainage bag to be changed twice monthly. However, there was no documented evidence that the drainage bag was changed on the specified dates, despite staff interviews confirming this was standard practice and part of the facility's protocol. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of documentation for these required changes. Additionally, another resident with a suprapubic catheter had a care plan requiring urinary output to be measured and documented every shift. A review of the clinical record revealed multiple dates and shifts over several months where there was no documented evidence that urinary output was measured as required. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation for these periods, indicating that the facility did not follow its own policy and the resident's care plan regarding urinary output monitoring.
Failure to Properly Label, Date, and Discard Food Items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comply with its own food labeling and dating policy, as well as professional standards for food storage and handling. Observations in the kitchen revealed that a package of pre-sliced bologna and ham, which was wrapped in plastic wrap and dated August 10, 2025, with a discard date of August 15, 2025, had not been discarded as required. Additionally, an opened gallon container of vanilla milk shake/ice cream mix in the walk-in refrigerator was not dated when opened and lacked a manufacturer's expiration date. Three unopened iced coffees in the same refrigerator were found to be past their stamped use by date and had not been discarded. Staff interviews confirmed that these food items should have been properly labeled, dated, and discarded according to facility policy and manufacturer guidelines. The Dietary Supervisor acknowledged that the pre-sliced meats and iced coffees should have been discarded after their respective dates, and that the milk shake/ice cream mix should have been dated when opened. These findings indicate a failure to ensure that food was stored, labeled, and discarded in accordance with both facility policy and regulatory requirements.
Failure to Provide Required Annual In-Service Training for Nurse Aides
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training for two out of five nurse aides reviewed. A review of the facility's list of nurse aides, including their hire dates and training hours, revealed that Nurse Aide 7 and Nurse Aide 8 did not have documented evidence of completing the mandated in-service training within their respective annual periods. Staff interviews, including one with the Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed the absence of documentation for the required training hours for these nurse aides. This deficiency was identified through a review of records and staff interviews, and it was determined that the facility did not meet the regulatory requirements for ongoing nurse aide education, specifically in the areas of dementia care and abuse prevention, as required by state code.
Failure to Notify Physician After Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by not following a physician's request for follow-up after a change in condition. A cognitively impaired resident who required assistance with daily care experienced a coughing fit after taking bedtime medications with water. The physician was informed of the incident and instructed staff to monitor the resident and provide a status update the following day to determine if a chest x-ray was needed. However, there was no documented evidence that the physician was contacted the next day as requested. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing during an interview.
Failure to Maintain Safe Environment for Resident at Risk of Wandering
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment for a resident, who was at risk for wandering and falls. The resident, diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia, was assessed as being at moderate risk for wandering. Despite this, the resident was able to exit the facility undetected due to a series of failures in the safety measures that were supposed to be in place. The care plan for the resident included the use of a door alarm to alert staff if the resident left her room, but this alarm was not activated by the LPN responsible for the resident's care. Additionally, the facility's preventative maintenance log showed a lack of documentation for the monthly checks and replacement of door alarm batteries. This oversight contributed to the failure of the door alarms, as the batteries were found to be dead, allowing the resident to exit the facility without triggering an alarm. The resident was later found outside near the smoke shed, indicating a significant lapse in the facility's safety protocols. Interviews with the Director of Nursing confirmed that the door alarm on the resident's room was not turned on as required, and the door leading to the chapel and the exit door did not function properly due to dead batteries. This series of inactions and failures in following established safety protocols led to the resident being able to leave the facility undetected, highlighting a critical deficiency in maintaining a safe environment for residents at risk of wandering.
Failure to Maintain a Clean and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for residents in one of its secured units. Observations made on September 16, 2024, revealed that the carpet in the hallway on the 400 side of the secured unit was stained and dirty. Additionally, duct tape was used on the carpet at the threshold between the hallway and certain resident rooms, which was confirmed by the Director of Maintenance to address a trip hazard caused by a missing strip. The Director of Maintenance acknowledged that the carpet was supposed to be scrubbed nightly and was due for replacement. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the carpeting in the secured unit needed replacement and that duct tape should not have been used on the thresholds. These conditions were found to be in violation of resident rights and the administrator's responsibility as per 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) and 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a).
Food Storage and Cleanliness Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by several observations and staff interviews. The facility's policy required that food be discarded on or immediately after the expiration date. However, during an inspection, it was found that two gallons of chocolate ice cream mix and one gallon of vanilla ice cream mix were stored in the cooler past their expiration dates. Additionally, in the freezer, two bags of frozen chicken breasts were left open and exposed to air, and there were opened ice cream cup containers and food container debris on the floor. The dry storage room also had food crumbs and debris on the floor, which was sticky. Further observations revealed a fan with a large accumulation of dust blowing onto the food prep area, and dirt and debris on the floors of both the freezer and dry storage room. The Food Service Director confirmed these findings, acknowledging that the expired items should have been discarded and the areas should have been clean.
Failure to Assess Resident's Ability to Self-Administer Insulin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to determine if a resident was safe to self-administer medications, specifically insulin, for one of the residents reviewed. The facility's medication policy allows self-administration when authorized by a physician, with control and supervision being the responsibility of the facility. However, there was no documented evidence in the clinical record of the resident to indicate that an assessment was completed to determine her safety in self-administering her medication. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis of diabetes, had physician's orders allowing her to use an insulin pump and manage her insulin bolus, provided she notified staff prior to self-administration. Despite these orders, a nurse's note indicated that the resident appeared anxious and confused at times, raising concerns about her ability to safely manage her diabetes. Observations confirmed that the resident had an insulin pump attached and reported it functioning properly. An interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed that no assessment had been conducted to evaluate the resident's capability to self-administer her medications safely, which is a requirement under the facility's policy.
Failure to Ensure Anonymous Grievance Filing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents and their representatives could file grievances anonymously, as required by their Grievance Process policy dated January 10, 2024. During an interview with a group of residents, it was revealed that they were unaware of how to file a grievance anonymously. The Director of Nursing confirmed that grievance forms were located behind each nursing station and could only be accessed by nurses, preventing residents or their representatives from filing grievances independently. This deficiency was identified during a review of policies and interviews with residents and staff.
Failure to Provide Written Notification for Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely written notification to residents and their responsible parties regarding the reasons for hospital transfers, as required by regulations. For Resident 54, who had a history of a cerebral vascular accident with hemiplegia, the deficiency occurred when the resident was transferred to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis. Despite the critical nature of the transfer, there was no documented evidence that a written notice was provided to the resident or their legal guardian explaining the reason for the hospitalization. This was confirmed through an interview with the Business Office Manager. Similarly, for Resident 83, who was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for daily care, the facility failed to provide written notices for multiple hospital transfers. The resident was transferred to the hospital on several occasions due to decreased urine output, abnormal drainage, and changes in condition such as fever and elevated heart rate. In each instance, there was no documented evidence that the resident's responsible party was notified in writing about the reasons for these transfers. This lack of documentation was also confirmed by the Business Office Manager.
Failure to Issue Bed-Hold Notices for Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to issue a bed-hold notice at the time of an anticipated leave of absence for two residents, resulting in a deficiency. Resident 54, who had a history of a cerebral vascular accident with hemiplegia, was transferred to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis after experiencing complications with a foley catheter. Despite the transfer, there was no documented evidence that a bed-hold notice was issued to the resident or his responsible party. This was confirmed by the Business Office Manager during an interview. Similarly, Resident 83, who was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for daily care, was transferred to the hospital on multiple occasions due to various medical conditions, including decreased urine output, a distended abdomen, and a change in condition with fever and elevated heart rate. In each instance, there was no documented evidence of a bed-hold notice being issued to the resident or his responsible party. The Business Office Manager confirmed that the facility was not providing written bed-hold notices during these transfers.
Failure to Develop Care Plan for Diabetes Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a care plan to address the individualized care needs of a resident, identified as Resident 99, who was admitted with a diagnosis of diabetes. Despite having physician's orders dated September 11 and September 12, 2024, for the use of an insulin pump and self-management of insulin bolus, there was no documented evidence of a care plan being established to manage these needs. The facility's policy requires that a care plan be established within 24 hours of admission and reviewed as needed, but this was not adhered to in the case of Resident 99. Observations on September 17, 2024, confirmed that Resident 99 had an insulin pump attached and functioning properly, yet the care plan was still missing. An interview with the Director of Nursing on September 18, 2024, further confirmed the absence of a care plan for the resident's diabetes management and insulin pump use. This oversight was a violation of the facility's policy and the regulatory requirement under 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) for resident care plans.
Failure to Update Care Plan for PTSD Triggers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update and revise the care plan for a resident to reflect specific care needs related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The facility's policy requires that a resident care plan be established within 24 hours of admission and reviewed and revised as needed, including for new or revised interventions. However, for one resident, the care plan did not include any documented evidence addressing triggers related to PTSD, despite a psychiatry consult note indicating the resident experienced PTSD symptoms due to military service. The deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the facility did not attempt to identify the resident's PTSD triggers or revise the care plan accordingly. This oversight was identified during a review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, which highlighted the resident's need for assistance with daily care and understanding, as well as diagnoses of dementia and PTSD.
Failure to Provide Trauma-Informed Care for Resident with PTSD
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) received trauma-informed care to mitigate or eliminate triggers. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the resident indicated that they were understood, could usually understand others, required assistance for daily care needs, and had diagnoses including dementia and PTSD. However, the care plan did not document any specific triggers for the resident or measures to prevent or minimize these triggers. An interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed that a trauma-informed care assessment was not completed for the resident. This deficiency was identified during a review of the clinical record and staff interviews, highlighting a lack of trauma-informed care for the resident.
Improper Labeling of Resident's Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled for one of the residents, identified as Resident 36. The facility's policy, dated January 10, 2024, requires that medications brought by residents from home or another facility must be properly labeled and ordered by a physician. However, during an observation on September 19, 2024, it was found that Resident 36's biological and herbal supplements were stored in eight unlabeled plastic zip-lock baggies in the medication refrigerator. These baggies contained multiple tablets and capsules without any labeling to indicate ownership or contents. Resident 36, who has a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, was ordered by a physician to self-administer approximately sixty-one different over-the-counter biological and herbal supplements. The supplements were prepared by the resident's son and brought into the facility without proper labeling. An interview with an LPN confirmed the lack of labeling, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the issue, noting that a list of the supplements was maintained for the nursing staff. This deficiency was cited under 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy Services and 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing Services.
Incomplete Documentation of Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented clinical records for a resident with diabetes. The resident was admitted with a physician's order allowing her to manage her insulin bolus using an insulin pump, provided she notified staff before each administration. On a specific date, the resident experienced nausea and vomiting and reported administering a small insulin bolus. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for that month lacked documentation of the insulin amounts self-administered by the resident. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, who acknowledged the absence of documented evidence regarding the resident's insulin bolus administration.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to prevent the spread of infections and cross-contamination. Specifically, the facility did not implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two residents who had indwelling urinary catheters, which are considered high-contact care activities requiring gown and glove use. The facility's policy, updated in January 2024, mandates the use of EBP for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of their MDRO status. Observations revealed that Resident 25, who was cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter, did not have EBP in place, as confirmed by a registered nurse. Similarly, Resident 37, who was cognitively impaired and also had an indwelling urinary catheter, was observed without EBP, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing. There was no signage or PPE available in or around the rooms of these residents, indicating a failure to implement the necessary precautions to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms.
Deficiency in Maintaining Safe and Sanitary Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in one of the two shower rooms on the secured unit and in a resident's bathroom. Observations made on September 16 and September 18, 2024, revealed that the toilet grab bars in the shower room were loose, and the toilet had rust stains and a black, removable substance around it. Additionally, the toilet grab bars in a resident's bathroom were also found to be loose and not securely attached to the wall or floor. An interview with the Director of Maintenance confirmed that the grab bars in both the shower room and the resident's bathroom should not be loose, and there should not be rust or a black, removable substance around the toilet. This deficiency was noted under the regulation 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a), which outlines the administrator's responsibility to ensure a safe and sanitary environment.
Neglect Leading to Resident Fall and Fracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect, resulting in a fall and fracture for a resident. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a seizure disorder, was at risk for injury due to falls. The care plan specified that the resident should not be left alone during toileting, should be walked with a gait belt, and required assistance from two staff members during the evening and night shifts. However, Nurse Aide 1 left the resident alone on the toilet, did not use a gait belt, and did not provide the required two-person assistance, leading to the resident falling and sustaining a nasal bone fracture and a urinary tract infection (UTI). The incident occurred when Nurse Aide 1 walked the resident to the bathroom and left her unattended to assist another resident. Upon returning, he found the resident on the floor with a significant nosebleed. The investigation confirmed that Nurse Aide 1 did not follow the care plan, which constituted neglect. The resident's fall and subsequent injuries were directly linked to the failure to adhere to the specified care plan, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing.
Failure to Implement Care Plan Leads to Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff implemented care-planned interventions for a resident identified as a fall risk, resulting in a fall and fracture. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a seizure disorder, was assessed as being at risk for injury due to falls related to decreased mobility, muscle weakness, gait abnormality, lack of coordination, and history of falls. The care plan specified that the resident should not be left alone during toileting, should be walked with a gait belt, and required assistance from two staff members during the evening and night shifts. However, on the night of the incident, the assigned nurse aide walked the resident to the bathroom without using a gait belt and left the resident unattended on the toilet, contrary to the care plan instructions. The resident subsequently fell and sustained a nasal bone fracture and a urinary tract infection. The nurse aide admitted to not following the care plan, including failing to use a gait belt and leaving the resident unattended. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the nurse aide's actions constituted neglect, as they directly led to the resident's fall and injury. The incident was thoroughly investigated, and it was determined that the nurse aide's failure to adhere to the care plan resulted in serious harm to the resident. The nurse aide was terminated from employment following the investigation.
Failure to Follow Care Plan Results in Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe environment for a resident, resulting in a fall with a fracture. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of seizure disorder, was at risk for injury due to falls related to decreased mobility, muscle weakness, gait abnormality, lack of coordination, and a history of falls. The resident's care plan specified that staff should use a gait belt for ambulation, not leave the resident alone during toileting, and provide assistance with two staff members during the evening and night shifts. On the night of the incident, the assigned caregiver, Nurse Aide 1, walked the resident to the bathroom without using a gait belt and left the resident unattended on the toilet while assisting another resident. The resident subsequently fell and sustained a closed fracture of the nasal bone. Nurse Aide 1 admitted to not following the care plan, which required the use of a gait belt and assistance from two staff members for ambulation and transfers, as well as not leaving the resident alone during toileting. The Director of Nursing confirmed that Nurse Aide 1's actions constituted neglect, as the failure to follow the care plan resulted in serious harm to the resident. The incident was investigated, and it was determined that the neglect led to the resident's fall and injury. The facility's policies on gait belts and transfers were not adhered to, leading to the deficiency cited as past non-compliance.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 191 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Johnstown
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richland Nursing And Rehab | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Laurel View Village | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Windber Woods Senior Living & Rehabilitation Ctr | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu | 3.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Quality Life Services - Westmont | 3.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Concordia At Arbutus Park.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.