Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Greenbrier Village Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Damaged and stained furniture in the memory care unit was observed during survey. Eight recliners had tears and cracks in the arms, and two couches in the dining area were stained, with one couch having a large slit exposing the cushion. An LPN and a CMA confirmed the furniture was worn and not in good condition.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual Abuse: A memory care resident with severe cognitive impairment, wandering, and behavioral issues was observed touching and kissing another resident inappropriately, including contact to the groin, chest, and face. A separate resident with dementia and moderate cognitive impairment reported the same resident entered their room at night and touched their breast/shoulder area. The DON stated resident behaviors were tracked daily, but there was no documentation of the behavioral findings or IDT tracking.
Unsanitary Ice Machine Maintenance: The dining room ice machine had a black substance inside the ice storage bin when wiped with a paper towel, and the facility had no documentation that it had been cleaned and sanitized. Dietary staff gave conflicting reports about who cleaned the machine and how often, and the CDM later stated staff had only been wiping down the outside of the ice machine with no cleaning log.
The facility failed to submit the required PBJ staffing data to CMS within the mandated timeframe. A PBJ Staffing Data Report showed the data had not been provided for the quarter, and the administrator stated they could not locate documentation showing it had been submitted. The DON identified 99 residents in the facility.
Failure to implement the Legionella water management program. The facility had a policy requiring a water system diagram, identification of Legionella growth areas and situations, control measures, monitoring, and documentation, but had no documentation showing measures were taken to prevent Legionella. The DON reported that maintenance was only checking water temperatures weekly to prevent burns, and the administrator stated there was no water system diagram, no water testing, and no pipe flushing being done.
Failure to determine safe self-administration of medications: Two residents were involved in medication administration concerns, including one resident with severe cognitive impairment and another with intact cognition. In both cases, CMAs left or did not observe the residents take morning meds, which included an opioid pain medication, and the DON stated neither resident had a self-administration assessment or physician order to self-administer meds.
Facility failed to notify a resident’s family after a fall that caused a large bruise and a laceration over the right eye. The resident was admitted for therapy services, and the family later reported they discovered the injury during a visit and had not been told about the fall. The ADON and clinical VP agreed the family should have been notified immediately when the incident occurred.
Improper One-Person Mechanical Lift Transfer: A resident with dementia, a history of falls, and a care plan requiring a full-body mechanical lift for transfers was transferred from a geriatric chair to bed by one CNA alone. The facility policy required two nursing assistants for mechanical lift transfers, and staff reported short staffing and being told to complete lift transfers without another aide available. The DON stated two staff members were absolutely required for mechanical lift use.
Failure to inform a resident's POA of antipsychotic risks: A resident with severe cognitive impairment had active orders for Risperdal/risperidone, and the MAR showed the medication was administered as ordered. The POA stated the facility contacted them about medications but did not explain the risks of the antipsychotic or ask for consent, and the DON could not locate a consent form for the initial risperidone order.
Failure to complete a PASSAR Level II referral after a resident developed new mental health diagnoses. The resident had a prior PASSAR Level I screen with no qualifying mental illness, but later records showed recurrent depressive disorder, violent behavior, psychotic disorder with delusions, and dementia. The MDS Coordinator stated a Level II screen should have been completed when the mental illness diagnoses were identified.
A resident with delusional disorders, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis, hyperlipidemia, and generalized anxiety disorder was admitted with severe cognitive impairment, but the facility had no documentation that a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission. The ADON stated the baseline care plan had not been completed because it could not be found in the EHR.
Failure to implement fall care plan interventions for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and high fall risk. The resident had multiple recent falls, bruising and a knot on the head/neck area, and was observed wearing non-grip socks. Surveyors found missing fall precautions in the room, including no sign by the bed, no tape on the call light, no floor grip tape, and the bed not in the lowest position; the ADON also stated therapy note interventions were not added to the care plan.
Failure to assess and provide care for a resident with edema. A resident with severe cognitive impairment was observed with swollen feet, and the record lacked a completed baseline care plan and a complete admission assessment. Nursing documentation later noted edema in the extremities and feet, while staff interviews showed the CNA had noticed purple feet without checking them and the RN had not assessed the pedal areas. The DON stated staff should have been checking for edema every shift and documenting findings.
The facility did not provide RN coverage for at least eight consecutive hours on certain days, as required. On these occasions, an RN who was scheduled called in and was replaced by an LPN, resulting in a lack of RN presence for the required period while 81 residents were in the facility.
The facility did not consistently monitor or document side effects and behaviors for residents on psychotropic medications, and failed to ensure PRN psychotropic orders were limited to 14 days with physician re-evaluation. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices and a lack of clarity regarding monitoring requirements, leading to gaps in compliance with medication safety protocols.
The facility did not post all required components of daily nurse staffing information in accessible locations. Observations showed that only partial staffing details were available on whiteboards and clipboards, and staff confirmed the postings did not meet regulatory standards. The administrator acknowledged the deficiency.
Staff failed to follow infection prevention protocols during wound care for a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer by not wearing gowns as required by Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and both the wound care nurse and DON were unaware of the policy. Laundry staff did not maintain clean dryer lint compartments, and during contact isolation for a resident, a CNA did not change gloves during incontinent care and touched the resident's environment with contaminated gloves, despite staff acknowledging the need for proper PPE.
A resident with a history of stroke and dementia developed new symptoms, including delusions and aggressive behavior, and was prescribed an antipsychotic. Despite these changes and a new diagnosis of delusional disorder, the facility did not update the PASARR Level 1 screening, as the DON considered the delusions a symptom of dementia and did not initiate a new referral.
A resident with a diagnosis of delusional disorder did not have this mental health condition accurately documented on the PASARR Level I form, and the required notification to the State office was not made. Facility staff showed uncertainty about the diagnosis, with the administrator recognizing it as a mental health disorder and the DON initially attributing it to a medical condition before confirming it as a psychotic disorder.
A resident with multiple diagnoses experienced a fall resulting in a skin tear, but the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party. The incident was documented in a progress note, but there was no record of family notification. The DON confirmed the lack of documentation, and an LPN acknowledged that the facility's policy requires family notification for all incidents.
Damaged and Stained Furniture in Memory Care Unit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure furniture in the memory care unit was kept clean, maintained in good repair, and reflected a home-like environment. The DON identified 17 residents living in the unit. Surveyors observed eight recliners in the common area with small tears and small cracks on each arm of each recliner. In the dining area, two couches were observed with multiple dark stains, and the couch on the right had a large slit in the upholstery exposing the cushion inside. Staff later confirmed the furniture was worn and damaged, with the couches stained and the recliners having tears and cracks in the arms.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from sexual abuse. The deficiency involved a memory care unit with 17 residents, including one resident with severely impaired cognition, wandering, delusional disorder, inappropriate touching, and psychotropic medication use for behavior management. The resident had multiple care plan entries addressing agitation, wandering, and behaviors requiring supervision, line of sight during agitation, redirection, and monitoring of behavior episodes. A nurse reported witnessing the resident sitting close to another resident and touching that resident inappropriately. The resident was observed with hands on the other resident over clothing in the groin area, and when staff attempted to redirect the resident, the resident grabbed the other resident’s face and kissed them. A hospice note also documented the resident standing over the other resident in the dining room with hands on the other resident’s chest, abdomen, and groin area. A police report stated the resident forcibly kissed the other resident and touched the other resident on the breast and all over the body, while staff told the other resident to get away and then escorted the resident to their room. A second allegation involved another resident who had dementia, altered mental status, moderate cognitive impairment, and a high wandering risk. That resident reported that the same resident entered their room at night and grabbed their breast, and a police report documented the resident had entered the room and put a hand near the resident’s breast on the shoulder. The resident stated they told the other resident to leave, and the other resident then left. The DON stated resident behaviors were tracked daily by the IDT, but there was no documentation of the behavioral findings or tracking, and stated it was necessary to discuss resident behaviors and update care plans.
Unsanitary Ice Machine Maintenance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its ice machine was maintained in a sanitary condition. On observation, the ice machine located in the dining room had a black substance inside the ice storage bin when it was wiped with a paper towel. The facility had no documentation showing the ice machine had been cleaned and sanitized. The facility policy stated staff were to clean and sanitize the tray and ice scoop daily to help prevent contamination of ice machines. Dietary staff gave conflicting accounts of who cleaned the machine and how often, with one dietary staff member stating environmental staff cleaned it, the certified dietary manager stating dietary cleaned it weekly and maintenance cleaned it quarterly, and later stating dietary staff had only been wiping down the outside of the ice machine and that there was no log showing the machine had been cleaned.
Failure to Submit Required PBJ Staffing Data
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the required PBJ staffing data was submitted to CMS within the mandated timeframe. A PBJ Staffing Data Report for fiscal year quarter 2 2026 showed that the facility had not provided the staffing data to CMS for that quarter. The DON identified 99 residents in the facility, and on 06/24/26 at 2:59 p.m., the administrator stated they could not locate documentation showing the PBJ staffing data had been submitted to CMS for quarter two.
Failure to Implement Legionella Water Management Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its Legionella water management program to prevent waterborne contaminants. A Legionella Water Management Program policy dated 09/01/22 stated the program included a detailed description and diagram of the water system, identification of areas that could encourage Legionella growth, identification of situations that can lead to Legionella growth, specific control measures, a diagram of where control measures are applied, monitoring of control limits and effectiveness, and documentation of the program. However, the facility had no documentation showing that measures were taken to prevent Legionella. The administrator stated on 06/25/26 that the facility did not have a water management program in place, that maintenance was only checking water temperatures weekly to prevent burns, and that there was no diagram of the facility's water system, no testing of the water, and no flushing of the pipes being conducted by anyone in the facility.
Failure to Determine Safe Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined that residents could safely self-administer oral medications for two sampled residents. For one resident, 15 medications of different colors were observed in a medication cup in the room with no staff present. The resident had a BIMS score of 3 on admission assessment, indicating severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making. The resident stated staff did not observe them take their medications and usually set the medications in the room and leave. A CMA identified the medications as the resident’s morning medications, including an opioid pain medication, and stated the resident did not have an order for self-administration of medication and that staff were supposed to observe the resident take the medications. For the second resident, the resident was observed taking two pills while seated in the dining room, with a cup of medication pills present and the CMA at the medication cart across the room with their back turned. The resident stated they took two pills and that the CMA gave them their morning medications. The CMA stated they gave the resident the morning medications, which included an opioid pain medication, and did not observe the resident take the medications, although they stated the resident should be observed. The resident’s admission assessment showed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition for daily decision making, but the DON stated the resident did not have a self-administration assessment or a physician order to self-administer medications.
Failure to Notify Family After Resident Fall With Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a family member of a resident's fall that resulted in a large bruise and a 1.75 cm laceration over the right eye. The resident was admitted for therapy services, and a facility incident report showed the fall occurred at 4:27 p.m. on 02/12/26. The record showed there was no documentation that the resident's family was informed until 02/13/26. During interview, a family member stated they visited the resident at about 1:00 p.m. the day after the fall and noticed bruising and a laceration to the resident's right eye, and they had not been informed of the fall. The ADON stated a fall with a laceration would be considered an emergency if stitches were required, and the clinical VP stated they would attempt to notify the family immediately, agreeing the family should have been notified when the fall occurred.
Improper One-Person Mechanical Lift Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two staff members were used to transfer a resident with a mechanical lift. Resident #65 had a care plan directing that, for safety, the resident was only to be transferred using a mechanical full-body lift. The resident’s quarterly assessment showed substantial/maximal assistance was needed for transfers, cognition was severely impaired with a BIMS score of 2, and the resident had dementia and a history of falls. The facility’s policy stated that at least two nursing assistants were needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. During observation, CNA #2 was seen leaving Resident #65’s room with the mechanical lift after transferring the resident from a geriatric chair to the bed while alone in the room. CNA #2 later stated the transfer was done by one person because the other aide had to take a phone call and no other staff was available. Family member #1 reported that on another occasion one staff member attempted to transfer the resident alone with a mechanical lift, and the hospice nurse intervened because two staff members were supposed to be used for safety. Other CNAs stated they had been told to transfer residents with mechanical lifts by themselves when no other staff was available, and the DON stated that two staff members were absolutely required when using a mechanical lift.
Failure to Inform Representative of Antipsychotic Risks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform a resident's representative of the risks of psychotropic medication for Resident #34, who had active orders for Risperdal 1 mg and risperidone 0.25 mg. The resident's medication orders showed the antipsychotic risperidone was initially received in 2025, but there was no documentation that the resident or family member was informed of the risks associated with the medication. Resident #34's quarterly MDS dated 05/13/26 showed a BIMS score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident's MAR for 06/2026 showed Risperdal was administered as ordered. On 06/24/26, the resident's POA stated the facility had contacted them about the resident's medications but did not inform them of the risks associated with the antipsychotic medication and that they were not asked to sign any antipsychotic consent forms on the resident's behalf. An LPN stated that the risks and benefits of a new medication were discussed with a resident's family before administration, but on 06/25/26 the facility provided only a blank antipsychotic consent form that listed general risks and benefits and did not name any antipsychotic medications. The DON stated the antipsychotic consent form for the initial risperidone order could not be located.
Failure to Refer for PASSAR Level II Evaluation After New Mental Health Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to evaluate a resident for the need of a PASSAR Level II referral after the resident received new mental health diagnoses. Resident #65 had a PASSAR Level I screening dated 11/12/12 showing no qualifying diagnosis or mental illness requiring a Level II referral, but later records showed diagnoses of recurrent depressive disorder, violent behavior, psychotic disorder with delusion due to a known physiological condition, and unspecified dementia. The resident was observed in the dining room for lunch on 06/24/26 and refused to eat when offered food by staff. The facility’s Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring policy stated that new onset or changes in behavior indicating a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related disorder are referred for a PASSAR Level II evaluation. On 06/25/26, the MDS Coordinator stated that when the resident was diagnosed with psychotic disorder with delusions, violent behavior, and recurrent depressive disorder, a PASSAR Level II screen should have been completed, and stated they were not aware why the resident had not been rescreened.
Baseline Care Plan Not Completed Within 48 Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for Resident #23. The resident had diagnoses including delusional disorders, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis, hyperlipidemia, and generalized anxiety disorder, and the admission MDS dated 05/14/26 showed a BIMS score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of the resident’s electronic health record and face sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], but there was no documentation that a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours after admission. On 06/25/26 at 2:40 p.m., the ADON stated the baseline care plan had not been completed because it could not be found in the electronic health record.
Failure to Implement Fall Care Plan Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement comprehensive fall-related care plan interventions for one resident with severe cognitive impairment. Resident #84 had a quarterly MDS dated 05/11/26 showing a BIMS score of 1 and a Morse Fall Scale score of 55 on 06/08/26, indicating high fall risk. The care plan dated 05/12/26 documented multiple falls on 04/02/26, 04/08/26, 05/07/26, and 06/08/26 and listed interventions including a stop/no fall sign by the bed, yellow tape on the call light, grip tape on the floor, keeping the bed in low position, and encouraging proper footwear. During observations, Resident #84 was seen with purplish dark bruises on the cheeks, forehead, and around the neck, along with a knot on the left temporal region above the ear. The resident was observed wearing fuzzy non-grip blue socks on multiple occasions. Surveyors also observed no floor grip tape, no call light tape, and no sign hung by the bed in the resident’s room. The ADON stated the resident’s fall interventions included assistance with transfers, frequent checks, bright colored tape on the call light, and a call don't fall sign by the bed, and also stated a therapy note dated 06/10/26 suggested post-fall interventions that were not added to the current care plan. CNA #1 stated there was no sign by the bed, no tape on the call light, and the bed was not lowered to the lowest position.
Failure to Assess and Document Edema
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess and provide care for a resident with edema for 1 of 24 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. Resident #23 was observed on 06/21/26 sitting in the memory care common room without socks, and both feet were noted to be swollen. On 06/23/26, the resident was again observed sitting in a recliner in the memory care common room wearing yellow socks, and the feet were still observed to be slightly swollen, although the full condition of the feet could not be determined because the resident was wearing socks. Record review showed the resident’s electronic health record did not contain a completed baseline care plan and did not show a complete admission assessment to determine potential existing health conditions. The nursing admission screening/history dated 05/01/26 had no documentation in the extremities/gait/mobility section. A nursing note dated 05/07/26 documented edema in the upper and lower extremities, and the admission MDS dated 05/14/26 showed a BIMS score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A later nursing note documented 1+ edema in both feet, with right foot 1+ and left foot trace. During interviews, CNA #5 stated they had noticed the resident’s feet were purple but had not checked them, RN #1 initially stated they did not think the resident had edema and had not assessed the pedal areas, and the DON stated staff should have been checking the resident for edema every shift and documenting their findings.
Failure to Ensure Required RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide registered nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week, as required. Record review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report and Timecard Reports revealed that there were no RN hours documented on two specific dates. On these dates, the facility did not have an RN on duty for the required time period. The administrator confirmed that although an RN was scheduled, the RN called in and was replaced by a licensed practical nurse (LPN) instead. At the time of the deficiency, the facility had 81 residents residing in the facility.
Failure to Monitor and Document Psychotropic Medication Use and PRN Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring and documentation of side effects and behaviors for residents receiving psychotropic medications. For multiple residents with diagnoses such as generalized anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia, there were no orders or documentation for side effect monitoring, nor was there consistent behavior monitoring as required by facility policy. Medication administration records showed that psychotropic medications were given as ordered, but there was a lack of evidence that side effects or behavioral responses were being tracked or assessed over extended periods. Additionally, the facility did not comply with the requirement to limit PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication orders to 14 days without physician re-evaluation. For at least two residents, PRN orders for medications such as lorazepam were written as indefinite and continued beyond the 14-day period without documented physician review or re-authorization. Staff interviews confirmed that these PRN orders were not discontinued or rewritten, and that documentation of behavioral indications for use and side effect monitoring was inconsistent or absent. Interviews with nursing staff and medication aides revealed a lack of clarity and consistency in the process for monitoring and documenting side effects of psychotropic medications. Staff reported that they documented by exception, only noting behaviors or side effects when they occurred, rather than conducting and recording regular assessments. There was also confusion among staff regarding which medications were considered psychotropics and what side effects to monitor, with some staff only able to identify a single side effect or medication. This lack of systematic monitoring and documentation contributed to the facility's failure to meet regulatory requirements for the safe use of psychotropic medications.
Incomplete Posting of Daily Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all required components of daily nurse staffing information were posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors. Observations on multiple units, including the skilled unit and various halls, revealed that staffing information was either incomplete or not posted as required. Instead, staff rosters and whiteboards displayed only partial information, such as staff names, titles, and shift schedules, but did not include all mandated elements. Interviews with staff confirmed that the posted information did not meet regulatory requirements, and the administrator acknowledged the deficiency. At the time of the survey, 81 residents resided in the facility.
Infection Control Failures in Wound Care, Laundry, and Contact Isolation Procedures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and follow its infection prevention and control program in several key areas. During wound care for a resident with a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, the wound care nurse and a CNA performed the procedure without donning gowns, despite the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy requiring gowns for wound care. Both staff members were unaware of the EBP policy and its requirements. The resident had a physician's order for daily wound care involving multiple dressings and topical treatments. The Director of Nursing also indicated uncertainty regarding the EBP policy. Additionally, the facility did not maintain proper infection control in the laundry area, as all three dryer lint compartments were observed to be full of lint, with excess lint present on the floor, contrary to the stated practice of cleaning lint traps twice daily or as needed. In another instance, staff failed to follow contact isolation procedures during incontinent care for a resident on contact precautions. While gowns and gloves were eventually worn, a CNA did not change gloves throughout the procedure and subsequently touched the resident's personal items and environment with contaminated gloves. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent knowledge and application of required PPE protocols for contact isolation.
Failure to Update PASARR After New Mental Health Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a PASARR Level 1 screening was completed after a new mental health diagnosis was identified for a resident. Initially, the resident had a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident and a secondary diagnosis of dementia without behaviors. Subsequent behavioral notes documented significant changes, including verbal aggression, resistance to care, and delusional statements. The resident was later prescribed Seroquel for delusional disorders, and the medical record reflected additional diagnoses such as psychotic disorder, anxiety, depression, pseudobulbar effect, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Despite these new symptoms and diagnoses, the PASARR Level 1 was not updated to reflect the resident's delusional disorder. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the new diagnosis was not included on the PASARR, stating that delusions were considered a symptom of dementia and therefore did not warrant a new screening. The DON also indicated that the facility's process did not involve completing a new PASARR when a new mental health diagnosis was added by a physician.
Failure to Accurately Document Mental Health Diagnosis on PASARR Form
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a mental health diagnosis on the PASARR form for one resident who was reviewed for the need of a Level II screening. Specifically, the PASARR Level I form for the resident did not include the diagnosis of delusional disorder, despite this diagnosis being present in both the electronic medical record as an admitting diagnosis and in the resident's care plan. The PASARR form marked 'No' for the presence of a serious mental illness, and the State office was not notified as required. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion regarding the nature of the resident's mental health diagnosis. The administrator acknowledged that delusional disorder was a mental health disorder relevant to PASARR, while the DON initially attributed the diagnosis to a metabolic condition but later confirmed it was a psychotic disorder. The DON stated that the PASARR was marked correctly at the time, but also confirmed that the State office was not contacted about the PASARR for this resident.
Failure to Notify Family of Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party following a fall incident involving a resident diagnosed with arterial fibrillation, acute respiratory infection, and congestive heart failure. On June 2, 2024, a progress note documented that the resident was found on the floor in their room with a skin tear on the right elbow. However, there was no documentation indicating that the resident's representative was informed of the fall. During an interview on October 8, 2024, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no record of notification to the emergency contacts listed in the resident's chart. Additionally, an LPN stated that the facility's policy requires family notification for all incidents, but upon reviewing the progress note, they acknowledged that it did not confirm whether the family was notified of the fall.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 25 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Enid
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Living Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Enid Senior Care | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Commons | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Garland Road Nursing & Rehab Center | 4.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 2 |
| Baptist Village Of Enid | 5.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Greenbrier Village Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.