Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Presidential Post-acute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and dependence for transfers was being moved with a Hoyer lift when the top sling straps broke and the resident fell headfirst from about five feet. The resident sustained a C2 fracture, epidural hematoma, multiple thoracic spine fractures, and a scalp laceration, and later died from complications of blunt head trauma. The sling used was described as very worn and missing its tag, despite instructions that damaged or frayed slings should not be used.
Failure to maintain a homelike environment was cited after multiple resident rooms and hallway areas were observed with chipped paint, peeling wallpaper, missing drywall, and holes in the walls. The MD confirmed that resident room issues were not being fixed, hallway repairs had been left unpainted, and cosmetic bedroom repairs were delayed until residents were discharged.
A resident with multiple cardiac and neurological diagnoses had a physician order for metoprolol succinate ER 25 mg to be given once daily with instructions that it may be split but not crushed. During a medication pass, an LPN placed several medications, including the metoprolol succinate ER, into a cup and then into a crush pouch and crushed them before administration. In a later interview, the LPN confirmed she had crushed the extended-release metoprolol and acknowledged it should not have been crushed. Facility policy required medications to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders.
A resident with type 2 DM and intact cognition had a physician order for Insulin Lispro 23 units SQ before meals, with instructions to hold the dose if blood sugar was below 150. Review of the MAR and blood sugar records showed that nursing staff administered insulin on several occasions when the resident’s blood sugar was under 150, without any documented physician notification or new orders authorizing administration outside the parameters. An LPN confirmed that insulin was given contrary to the order and that it should have been held unless otherwise directed. Facility policy required medications to be given per prescriber orders and for the physician or medical director to be contacted if a dosage was believed inappropriate, but this was not followed.
Resident Exposed During Colostomy Care A resident with a colostomy and intact cognition was observed from the hallway with her stomach, brief, and legs exposed while a CNA provided ostomy care. The curtain had not been pulled far enough to prevent her body from being seen, and the resident stated she was very self-conscious of her ostomy and expected privacy during care.
Failure to Report Suspected Neglect After Lift-Related Fall: A resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, weakness, and dependence for transfers was being moved with a Hoyer lift when the sling loops ripped and the resident fell to the floor, sustaining a head laceration. CNAs were present, 911 was called, and EMS responded, but no SRI was initiated because the DON and Administrator did not believe abuse, neglect, or misappropriation occurred, despite policy requiring immediate reporting of suspected neglect or injury of unknown source.
Care plans were not person-centered or reflective of current resident status for three residents. One resident with PTSD had a trauma-informed care focus, but the plan did not include trauma history or triggers. Another resident with schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder had behavior monitoring orders, but no mental health goals or interventions were in the care plan. A third resident’s plan did not address ADL needs such as mobility, toileting, eating, dressing, grooming, bathing, or personal hygiene.
Failure to arrange vision and hearing services for a resident with intact cognition. The resident wanted to see an audiologist about hearing aids and reported recurring problems with a previously operated right eye, but the record showed no consent for ancillary services and no evidence of visits with an audiologist or optometrist. The AD confirmed the resident was an LTC resident and had not been spoken to about ancillary services.
Failure to provide ordered colostomy care was identified for a resident with a colostomy, intact cognition, and diagnoses including dysphagia, HTN, anxiety, depression, and overactive bladder. The care plan called for routine ostomy care and monitoring, but the MAR showed the appliance was not changed at the ordered intervals, with no documented reason for the missed care. The resident stated she was not always receiving colostomy care on schedule, and an RN confirmed the missed changes.
Residents signed binding arbitration agreements without demonstrated understanding. Two residents with severe cognitive impairment, including one with dementia and another with encephalopathy and cognitive communication deficit, signed their own agreements despite BIMS scores of 3 and 0. The AA stated she used BIMS scores and guardian/POA status to guide signing, but verified these two residents should not have signed their own arbitration agreements.
A resident with significant mobility limitations and a care plan requiring two-person assistance for transfers sustained a rib fracture after being transferred by only one staff member, who also failed to follow proper transfer technique. Additional incidents showed continued noncompliance with care plan requirements, including failure to lock wheelchair brakes and lack of proper staff assistance, leading to actual harm.
Nursing staff did not follow physician orders or facility policy for enhanced barrier precautions during wound care for a resident with multiple comorbidities and wounds. During a wound care procedure, two nurses failed to wear gowns as required, despite the resident's care plan and orders specifying the use of PPE, including gowns and gloves, for high-contact care activities.
A facility failed to use appropriate needles for intramuscular injections, as observed when an RN attempted to administer an antibiotic to a resident using a blunt fill needle-filter. The RN was unaware of the correct needle type, and the Director of Nursing confirmed the error, stating that a 19-23 gauge, 1.0 to 1.5-inch needle should be used. The facility's policy and manufacturer's guidance also indicated the blunt fill needle should not be used for skin injections.
A resident with multiple health conditions experienced significant weight loss, which the facility failed to address in a timely manner. Despite the care plan's interventions and the RD's recommendations, the facility did not document a re-weight or follow up on the weight loss until over two weeks later, contrary to their policy.
The facility failed to properly store chemicals in the kitchen, leading to a potential risk of cross-contamination for 74 of 76 residents. Observations revealed comet bleach powder and dawn dish detergent stored on the kitchen preparation sink, which is used for food preparation. Staff confirmed the improper storage and the facility's policy requiring chemicals to be stored separately.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses was observed twice with their urinary catheter drainage bag lying uncovered on the floor. An STNA confirmed this was against facility policy, which mandates that catheter tubing and drainage bags be kept off the floor for infection control.
The facility failed to maintain a replacement tracheostomy tube at the bedside for a resident requiring tracheostomy care. The resident, with a history of severe medical conditions including brain injury and respiratory failure, was observed without the necessary replacement tube in her room, contrary to the facility's policy.
Unsafe Mechanical Lift Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely with a mechanical lift. Resident #96 had severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for transfers and other activities of daily living, and had physician orders and a care plan directing use of a Hoyer lift for all transfers with two-person assistance. During a transfer from bed to wheelchair, two CNAs were present and the resident was raised in a mechanical lift sling approximately five feet off the ground. According to the report, the top two blue sling loops broke simultaneously while the resident was in the air. The resident fell backward and headfirst from the sling and landed on the back of the head and neck area. The incident report, EMS documentation, hospital records, and witness statements all described the resident sustaining a scalp laceration, a C2 fracture, an epidural hematoma, and multiple thoracic spine fractures. EMS transported the resident to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with serious traumatic injuries. The report also states the sling used for the transfer was very worn and had no tag attached. The sling was observed to be undated, with worn material and missing portions of the green band. The manufacturer instructions and sling manual reviewed in the investigation stated slings should be inspected for wear, damage, or fraying and removed from use if damaged. The resident later had advanced directives changed to DNR-CC, was admitted to hospice, and died with the immediate cause of death listed as complications of blunt impact injury to the head.
Failure to Maintain a Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a homelike environment by leaving multiple resident rooms and hallway areas with visible cosmetic damage. Observation of Resident #53's bedroom showed a large discolored area behind the bed frame with chipped paint, Resident #4's bedroom had peeling wallpaper and chipped paint, Resident #8's bedroom had a large area of drywall chipped and missing paint, and Resident #90's bedroom had two holes in the wall behind the bed with visible paint chipping. In addition, areas throughout the hallways were observed with chipped paint. The Maintenance Director confirmed that the facility was not fixing issues in resident rooms, stated that the hallway areas had been repaired but never painted, and said cosmetic repairs in bedrooms were delayed until residents were discharged. The facility policy titled Resident Environmental Quality stated that preventative maintenance schedules for building maintenance should be followed.
Improper Crushing of Extended-Release Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to prescriber orders when a nurse inappropriately crushed an extended-release medication for a resident. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including acute embolism and thrombosis of the left axillary vein, dementia, atrial fibrillation, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, had a physician order for metoprolol succinate ER 25 mg by mouth once daily with instructions that the tablet may be split but not crushed. During a medication pass observed at 8:40 A.M., an LPN placed multiple medications for this resident, including amiodarone 200 mg, escitalopram 10 mg, metoprolol succinate ER 25 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, furosemide 20 mg, and spironolactone 25 mg, into a medication cup, then into a crush pouch, and crushed them. In a subsequent interview, the LPN confirmed that she had crushed the metoprolol succinate ER and acknowledged it should not have been crushed because it was an extended-release tablet, and stated she did not crush the pantoprazole. Review of the facility’s “Administering Medications” policy dated April 2019 showed that medications are to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including required time frames. This issue was identified during an investigation under Complaint Number 2707817.
Insulin Administered Outside Ordered Blood Glucose Parameters
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow a physician’s order for insulin administration, resulting in significant medication errors for one resident with type 2 diabetes. The resident was readmitted on 03/03/26 and had an entry MDS BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. A physician’s order dated 03/03/26 directed that Insulin Lispro 23 units be administered subcutaneously before meals, with explicit instructions to hold the insulin if the resident’s blood sugar (BS) was less than 150. Review of the resident’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) and blood sugar summary showed that insulin was administered on multiple occasions when the BS was below the ordered parameter: on 03/05/26 at 11:30 A.M. for a BS of 107, on 03/06/26 at 6:30 A.M. for a BS of 127, on 03/06/26 at 4:30 P.M. for a BS of 97, and on 03/07/26 at 6:30 A.M. for a BS of 114. Further review of the resident’s progress notes revealed no documentation that the physician had been notified or had provided any new order authorizing insulin administration outside the specified BS parameters. During an interview on 03/11/26 at 9:47 A.M., LPN #180 confirmed that insulin had been given when the resident’s BS was below 150 and acknowledged that the insulin should have been held unless the physician ordered otherwise, which would have been documented in the progress notes. Review of the facility’s “Administering Medications” policy, revised April 2019, showed that medications are to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders and that the physician or medical director should be contacted if a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive. The facility’s failure to adhere to the physician’s insulin order and its own medication administration policy resulted in the cited deficiency, investigated under Complaint Number 2707817.
Resident Exposed During Colostomy Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #49’s dignity was maintained when her exposed body could be observed from the hallway during colostomy care. Resident #49 was admitted on 10/13/25 with diagnoses including encounter for attention to colostomy, dysphagia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, depression, diaphragmatic and umbilical hernia, and overactive bladder. Her quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment indicated intact cognition, and her plan of care dated 11/20/25 identified that she had a colostomy and was at risk for complications related to skin integrity, with an intervention to maintain privacy while providing care. During observation on 03/09/26 at 9:36 A.M., Resident #49 was seen from the hallway lying in bed with her stomach, brief, and legs exposed while CNA #114 provided colostomy care; the curtain had been pulled only enough that her head, arms, and chest were not visible. When interviewed, CNA #114 stated she did not realize the resident had been exposed and believed she had pulled the curtain far enough to provide privacy, then verified the curtain should have been pulled far enough to hide the resident from view. Resident #49 stated she was very self-conscious of her ostomy and expected staff to close the curtain during care and did not want to be seen during care. The facility policy on dignity stated staff were to promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and treatment procedures.
Failure to Report Suspected Neglect After Lift-Related Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an incident of potential neglect to the state agency after a witnessed fall involving Resident #96. Resident #96 had an admission date of 10/15/21 and a re-entry date of 12/24/22, with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, unspecified dementia, muscle weakness, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, unspecified osteoarthritis, and stiffness of both knees. The annual MDS showed severely impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 2, and the resident was dependent for bed-to-chair and chair-to-bed transfers, toileting hygiene, showering and bathing, and personal hygiene. Physician orders directed use of a Hoyer lift for all transfers, and the care plan identified the need for a Hoyer lift and assistance of two people for dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing. During a transfer from bed to wheelchair using a mechanical lift, the top two blue sling loops ripped and Resident #96 fell to the floor on the left side. CNA #181 and CNA #269 were present, the nurse was notified, 911 was called, and the resident sustained an approximately 2 cm by 1 cm laceration to the back of the head. Staff stabilized the resident’s head, removed the lift, and applied pressure to the bleeding area until EMS arrived. Review of the facility’s SRIs showed no SRI was initiated, and the DON and Administrator stated they did not submit one because they did not feel abuse, neglect, or misappropriation occurred. The facility policy stated that if abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of unknown source is suspected, the administrator immediately reports the suspicion to the state licensing/certification agency.
Care plans did not reflect residents’ current mental health and ADL needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure care plans were person-centered and reflected residents’ current status for three residents reviewed. For Resident #01, the record showed a re-admission with a diagnosis of PTSD, and the care plan dated 02/06/26 included a trauma-informed care focus for decreased psychosocial well-being, adjustment issues, emotional distress, ineffective coping skills, poor impulse control, and adverse effects on mental, physical, social, or spiritual well-being related to PTSD. However, the interventions and goals did not mention the resident’s PTSD history or any triggers. The DON confirmed that residents with PTSD should have trigger and trauma history information included in the care plan and confirmed this resident’s care plan did not include it. For Resident #23, the record showed re-admission with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder, and an order for behavior monitoring every shift, but the care plan had no goals or interventions related to the resident’s mental health diagnoses. For Resident #49, the record showed multiple diagnoses including colostomy care, dysphagia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, depression, hernias, and overactive bladder, but the care plan did not comprehensively address ADL needs such as bed mobility, toileting, eating, ambulation, dressing, grooming, bathing, and personal hygiene. The MDS Coordinator and RN Manager confirmed the missing ADL goals, and the DON confirmed the resident’s ADL needs were not documented in the care plan.
Failure to Arrange Vision and Hearing Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure vision and hearing services were arranged for Resident #49. The resident was admitted on 10/13/25 with diagnoses including encounter for attention to colostomy, dysphagia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, depression, diaphragmatic and umbilical hernia, and overactive bladder. Her quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition. Review of the medical record found no evidence that she had been asked to sign consent for ancillary services or that she had seen an audiologist or optometrist. During interview, Resident #49 stated she wanted to see an audiologist about hearing aids and reported prior surgery to her right eye that was causing problems again and that she wanted to see a doctor about it. The Activities Director confirmed that residents should be given consent for ancillary services once they become LTC residents and verified that Resident #49 was an LTC resident and had not been spoken to about receiving ancillary services.
Failure to Provide Ordered Colostomy Care
Penalty
Summary
Failure to provide colostomy care as ordered was identified for Resident #49. The resident was admitted on 10/13/25 with diagnoses including encounter for attention to colostomy, dysphagia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, depression, diaphragmatic and umbilical hernia, and overactive bladder. Her quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment indicated intact cognition, and her plan of care documented that she had a colostomy, was at risk for complications related to skin integrity, and required ostomy care as ordered, routine pouch emptying, privacy during care, observation for signs and symptoms of complications, and notification of the physician for abnormal findings. The physician order from 10/18/25 to 01/20/26 directed staff to change the colostomy appliance as needed for leakage and at least every three days, but the MAR showed the appliance was only changed on 11/15/25, 11/29/25, and 12/08/25. A later physician order dated 02/11/26 directed the appliance to be changed every three days on night shift, and the February 2026 MAR showed it was not completed as scheduled on 02/11/26. Progress notes from 10/18/25 to 02/11/26 contained no documented reason for the missed colostomy appliance changes. During interview, the resident stated she was not always receiving colostomy care on schedule, and an RN verified there was no evidence the colostomy appliance was changed as ordered for the identified dates.
Residents Signed Arbitration Agreements Without Demonstrated Understanding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents understood binding arbitration agreements before signing them. This affected four of six residents reviewed for arbitration agreements in a facility with a census of 89. The facility policy stated the terms and conditions of a binding arbitration agreement must be explained in a form and manner the resident understands, taking into account language, literacy, and learning preference, and that the resident or representative must verbally acknowledge understanding before signing; a signature alone was not sufficient. The policy also required the verbal acknowledgement to be documented by the staff member who explained the agreement. Resident #55 was admitted with dementia, had an MDS BIMS score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment, and signed the arbitration agreement on admission. During interview, the resident did not know what an arbitration agreement was and could not answer questions, including not remembering whether lunch had been eaten. Resident #68 was admitted with diagnoses including contusion and laceration of cerebrum without loss of consciousness, encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, and nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, had a BIMS score of 0 indicating severe cognitive impairment, and signed her own arbitration agreement during readmission. The admission assistant stated arbitration paperwork was completed electronically on an iPad, that she informed residents the agreement was voluntary, and that she used BIMS scores and the presence of a guardian, responsible party, or POA to determine who should sign; she later verified that Residents #55 and #68 should not have signed their own arbitration agreements.
Failure to Provide Required Assistance During Resident Transfers Resulting in Injury
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident, who was at risk for falls due to functional decline, weakness, and bedbound status, did not receive the required assistance from two staff members during transfers as specified in her care plan. The resident's care plan, updated shortly after admission, clearly indicated the need for two-person assistance during transfers and for staff to lock wheelchair brakes. Despite these interventions, the resident reported pain after a transfer, and subsequent X-rays confirmed a new acute nondisplaced left tenth rib fracture. The resident stated that the aide performing the transfer squeezed too tightly and that only one staff member was present during the transfer, contrary to the care plan requirements. Further review of the resident's medical record and interviews revealed that the resident continued to be dependent on staff for transfers and had intact cognition. Additional incidents were noted, including an event where the resident had to be lowered to the floor during a transfer because a wheelchair brake was not locked, again with only one staff member present. Staff interviews and documentation confirmed that the required two-person assistance was not consistently provided, and there was a lack of written documentation or retraining for staff involved in these incidents. Radiological evidence confirmed that the rib fracture was a new injury, not related to any prior incident before admission. The facility's investigation was unable to identify the specific staff member responsible for the July transfer that resulted in the fracture. The facility's policy required that residents unable to perform activities of daily living independently receive necessary services and assistance in accordance with their care plan, which was not followed in these instances.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) as ordered by the physician during wound care for a resident with multiple comorbidities, including congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. The resident required assistance with activities of daily living and had wounds that necessitated EBP during high-contact care activities. The care plan and physician orders specified the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), including gowns and gloves, during high-contact care such as wound care. During an observed wound care procedure, two nurses provided care to the resident's sacrum/right buttocks without wearing gowns, contrary to both the physician's orders and the facility's EBP policy. The nurses confirmed in interviews that a gown should have been worn during the procedure. Review of the facility's policy and CDC guidance further supported the requirement for gown and glove use during high-contact care for residents with wounds. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation and affected one of three residents reviewed for wounds.
Improper Needle Use for Intramuscular Injection
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the appropriate needles were used during intramuscular medication administration for a resident. During an observation of medication administration, a registered nurse (RN) was preparing to administer an antibiotic to a resident diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The RN initially used a BD blunt fill needle-filter to draw up the lidocaine solution and mix it with the Ertapenem sodium injection powder. After mixing, the RN attempted to use another blunt fill needle-filter to administer the medication intramuscularly, which was inappropriate for this type of injection. The surveyor intervened before the medication was administered, and the RN confirmed the use of a blunt fill needle-filter for injections, indicating a lack of knowledge about the correct needle type for intramuscular injections. The Director of Nursing confirmed that a blunt fill needle-filter should not be used for skin injections and that a 19-23 gauge, 1.0 to 1.5-inch needle should be used instead. The facility's policy and the manufacturer's guidance for the BD blunt fill needle also indicated that it should not be used for skin injections, highlighting the deficiency in following proper procedures for medication administration.
Failure to Address Resident's Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely address and follow through with recommendations for a resident's significant weight loss. Resident #100, who had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, dysphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and mild protein calorie malnutrition, experienced a weight loss of 9.8% in one month and 8.9% in one week upon readmission to the facility. The resident's care plan included interventions such as providing adequate time for meal consumption, assisting with meals and fluids, and monitoring meal intake and weight. Despite these interventions, the facility did not document a re-weight as recommended by the Registered Dietitian (RD) on 09/12/24, nor did they follow up on the significant weight loss identified on 09/30/24 until over two weeks later. The RD, who was present at the facility twice weekly, confirmed the lack of evidence for a re-weight and follow-up after the significant weight loss. The facility's policy required that any weight change of 5% or more since the last assessment should be retaken the next day for confirmation and the RD notified immediately. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, resulting in a delay in addressing the resident's nutritional needs. The Administrator acknowledged that any issues of weight loss should be followed up with immediately, but the facility failed to do so in this case.
Improper Chemical Storage in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store chemicals in the kitchen, leading to a potential risk of cross-contamination for 74 of 76 residents who received food from the kitchen. During an observation, comet bleach powder and dawn dish detergent were found stored on the kitchen preparation sink, which is used for food preparation activities such as dicing peppers, onions, slicing tomatoes, and cleaning lettuce. Cook #293 confirmed the presence of these chemicals on the sink but was unaware of why they were there. A subsequent observation revealed dawn dish detergent stored on the kitchen preparation sink again. The Dietary Director confirmed that kitchen chemicals should be stored in the chemical supply closet, as per the facility's Chemical Storage Policy dated March 2019, which mandates that chemicals must be stored in a designated area separate from food preparation, storage, and serving areas to prevent contamination.
Improper Positioning of Urinary Catheter Drainage Bag
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the proper position of a urinary catheter drainage bag for a resident. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, retention of urine, dementia, benign neoplasm of the pituitary gland, obstructive reflux uropathy, and testicular hypofunction, was observed on two separate occasions with the urinary catheter drainage bag lying uncovered directly on the floor. The resident was severely cognitively impaired and required partial moderate assistance with toileting. An STNA verified that the drainage bag should not be on the floor, and the facility's policy confirmed that catheter tubing and drainage bags should be kept off the floor for infection control purposes.
Failure to Maintain Replacement Tracheostomy Tube at Bedside
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a replacement tracheostomy tube at the bedside for a resident requiring tracheostomy care. Resident #7, who had a history of diffuse traumatic brain injury, quadriplegia, aphasia, hydrocephalus, and acute and chronic respiratory failure, was observed without a replacement tracheostomy tube in her room. This was confirmed by both the RN Manager and another RN. The facility's policy, dated October 2023, mandates that a replacement tracheostomy tube must be available at the bedside at all times, which was not adhered to in this instance.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 248 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Marion
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Nursing & Rehab | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 0 |
| Marion Pointe | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Marion Valley Post Acute | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Meadows Of Marion Health And Rehabilitation The | 3.1 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Harding Pointe | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Presidential Post-acute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.