Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pleasant View Health Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to consistently provide and document daily oral and denture care for several dependent residents. One resident with dementia and malnutrition had denture care documented on only a fraction of morning and evening opportunities. Another resident with hemiplegia, vascular dementia, and dysphagia, who required maximum assistance, had tooth brushing recorded on only a small number of the possible AM and PM care times. A third resident with schizophrenia, obesity, and dysphagia received more frequent oral care but still had missed or marked not‑applicable opportunities. A fourth resident with cerebral ischemia, pneumonia, and CKD stage III, who required maximum assistance, had AM and PM denture care documented on only part of the available days. The DON stated that oral care was expected twice daily and as needed, documented in the EMR, and confirmed it was not provided as required, while the facility’s oral care policy lacked specific frequency and documentation requirements.
A resident with intact cognition reported that another resident with moderate cognitive impairment attempted to kiss and grab his genitalia. The incident was documented by the DON, and the resident was moved to a new room. However, the DON and Administrator did not file a self-reported incident with the State agency, citing lack of physical contact, despite facility policy requiring all abuse allegations to be reported.
A resident with a history of fractures experienced multiple falls due to staff not following physician orders for using a mechanical sling lift during transfers. The resident was lowered to the floor on several occasions when staff attempted to transfer without the required equipment, leading to non-compliance findings.
Failure to Provide and Document Daily Oral and Denture Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide and document daily oral care, including denture care, for multiple residents who required staff assistance with oral hygiene. For Resident #81, who had Alzheimer’s dementia, vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, and protein-calorie malnutrition, the MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment and a need for maximum assistance with oral hygiene, and the care plan indicated dependence on staff for oral hygiene. Over a 30‑day period, morning denture care was documented as provided only 8 times out of 30 opportunities, with numerous days marked as not applicable or left without any entry, and evening denture care was documented as provided only 11 times out of 30 opportunities, again with several days marked not applicable or not recorded. Resident #82, with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia, peripheral vascular disease, dysphagia, and chronic pain syndrome, had an MDS indicating intact cognition but a need for maximum assistance with oral hygiene, and the care plan documented dependence on staff for oral hygiene. For this resident, the task “Brush teeth with AM and PM care” over 30 days showed that brushing was recorded only once per day on 16 days, with no evidence of brushing on multiple other days and several days marked as not applicable. Out of 60 possible AM and PM oral care opportunities, brushing teeth was recorded as provided only 16 times. Resident #100, diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, obesity, and dysphagia, had an MDS indicating intact cognition and a need for setup with oral hygiene, while the care plan documented a need for maximum staff assistance with oral hygiene. Over 30 days, oral care was documented as provided twice daily on 21 days and once daily on 7 days, with some entries marked not applicable, resulting in 51 documented oral care events out of 60 opportunities. Resident #101, with cerebral ischemia, influenza and pneumonia, and stage III chronic kidney disease, had moderate cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance with oral hygiene per the MDS and care plan. For this resident, AM denture care was documented as provided 20 times out of 30 opportunities, and PM denture care was documented as provided 14 times out of 30 opportunities, with several days not recorded, marked as not provided, or not applicable. In an interview, the DON stated that oral care was to be provided in the morning, evening, and as needed and documented in the EMR, and confirmed that oral care was not provided as required for these residents. The facility’s oral care policy directed staff to review the care plan and notify the nurse of mouth pain or refusals but did not specify frequency of oral care or documentation requirements.
Failure to Report Alleged Sexual Abuse to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State agency as required by policy. According to witness statements and interviews, a resident with intact cognition reported that another resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, attempted to kiss and grab his genitalia while sitting on his bed. The incident was immediately reported by the resident to staff, and the Director of Nursing (DON) documented the event, moved the reporting resident to a new room, and obtained statements from both residents. The accused resident denied the inappropriate contact and did not recall the incident. Despite the report and documentation of the alleged abuse, the DON and Administrator decided not to file a self-reported incident (SRI) with the State agency, reasoning that no actual contact occurred. Review of facility records confirmed that the incident was not reported to the State agency, contrary to the facility's policy, which requires all reports of abuse to be promptly reported and investigated. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation and was based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policies.
Failure to Follow Transfer Orders Leads to Resident Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safe transfer of a resident, leading to multiple incidents where the resident was lowered to the floor due to leg weakness. The resident, who had a history of fractures and required assistance for toileting and bathing, was involved in several incidents where staff did not follow the physician's orders for using a mechanical sling lift for transfers. On one occasion, the resident was transferred from bed to a shower chair without the use of the required Hoyer mechanical lift, resulting in the resident being lowered to the floor when unable to maintain weight. Further incidents occurred when the resident was in the spa, where staff attempted to assist the resident in standing at a grab bar to pull up pants, contrary to the order that specified the use of a mechanical sling lift. The resident's inability to stand led to being lowered to the floor again. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the staff did not adhere to the transfer orders, which required the use of a mechanical sling lift, and that the resident was inappropriately dressed while standing in the bathroom.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 875 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Barberton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barberton Post Acute | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| St Luke Lutheran Community-portage Lakes | 3.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Pebble Creek Healthcare Center | 5.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Green Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Ltd | 5.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Sanctuary Wadsworth | 5.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pleasant View Health Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.