Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Minerva Rehabilitation And Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to follow its TB Control Plan requiring TB screening for new staff and newly admitted residents. A newly hired housekeeper began working without receiving the first step of a two-step TST, and this lapse was confirmed by the housekeeper, an RN, and the HR director, who cited high staff turnover and lack of file audits. A newly admitted resident with multiple cardiac and respiratory diagnoses was scheduled for a TST on admission, but the MAR and nursing notes showed the test was not given because Tubersol was unavailable, and there was no documented follow-up or subsequent administration for several weeks.
Incomplete and Untimely Care Plans: The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans with required interventions for several residents. A resident receiving hospice services had no hospice care plan, a resident with smoking-related needs had no smoking care plan, a resident assessed as high risk for elopement had no elopement interventions in the care plan, and two residents with PICC/central line orders had no line-related care plan focuses. Staff and the DON confirmed the missing care plan elements, and policy required comprehensive care plans within 7 days of the MDS assessment.
Failure to Protect Resident Dignity with Urinal and Foley Bag: Two residents were observed with urinary items left exposed. One resident’s half-full urinal was left on an over-the-bed table in full view of the hallway while an LPN passed by and did not empty it, despite the resident being cognitively intact. Another resident’s half-full Foley catheter drainage bag was left uncovered and visible in the room; the LPN confirmed it was exposed before later covering it. The DON stated urinals should not be left in hallway view and Foley bags should be covered to protect dignity.
A resident admitted with COPD, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, and other diagnoses had a reddened sacral bony prominence noted on admission, but the baseline care plan did not include oxygen or wound care interventions. The chart also showed no admission orders for oxygen or wound care, while daily vitals documented oxygen use and an LPN confirmed the resident used oxygen and required pressure ulcer care.
A resident with pneumonia, UTI, HF, bacteremia, and respiratory failure had a PICC line dressing that remained dated from an earlier change despite a provider order to change the dressing and caps per protocol. TAR review showed no documentation of a dressing change, and repeated observations confirmed the same dated dressing was still in place. The DON verified the dressing should have been changed per the facility’s 5- to 7-day protocol, and the care plan lacked a central line focus.
Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Wound Care: A resident admitted with a reddened sacral area later developed multiple pressure injuries, including Stage II ulcers and a suspected deep tissue injury. The record showed no wound care orders or individualized prevention plan on admission, and the care plan lacked wound-specific interventions. Staff documented barrier cream and turning encouragement, but there was no clear evidence these measures were implemented, and the resident was observed lying on a standard mattress without pressure-relieving support while spending much of the time upright in bed.
The facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen administration for two residents. One resident with asthma and other chronic conditions was observed on oxygen via NC, and the MAR had no oxygen order or flow rate despite care plan references to oxygen therapy. Another resident with COPD, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pneumonia was also observed on oxygen, with charting showing ongoing oxygen use and daily O2 checks, but the record still contained no oxygen order and no oxygen care plan interventions. An LPN confirmed the missing orders for both residents.
Infection control failures occurred during wound care, incontinence care, and blood glucose testing. An LPN did not follow hand hygiene and glove-change steps during wound care for one resident, and another resident on EBP received bowel incontinence care and blood glucose testing without the required gown use. The LPN also removed and reapplied gloves multiple times during glucose testing without hand hygiene.
An LPN administered Gabapentin 600 mg, intended for one resident, to another resident who was prescribed a different dose. The error was recognized after administration, and the physician was contacted for a one-time order. The incident involved two residents with multiple medical conditions and was confirmed through record review and staff interviews.
The facility failed to ensure the Activities Director was qualified, affecting all 23 residents. The Director, also the Social Services Designee, lacked certification or training for leading activities in LTC centers. The Administrator confirmed the Director only received a one-week training from a former staff member and had not been enrolled in a professional training program due to cost concerns. Additionally, the Director did not receive required oversight from a qualified professional.
The facility's Administrator failed to ensure the Activities Director was properly trained and supervised, leading to inadequate activity offerings for residents. The Activities Director, who also served as the Social Services Designee, was hired without necessary certifications, and the Administrator was unaware of oversight requirements. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the limited activities, and the facility's budget constraints further hindered the provision of diverse and engaging programs.
The facility did not conduct an annual review of its facility-wide assessment for 18 months, affecting all 23 residents. The assessment was last reviewed in January 2023, and the list of responsible individuals was outdated. The Administrator confirmed the oversight and was working on a new format for the 2024 assessment.
The facility failed to document tuberculin skin test results for new employees, ensure hand hygiene during medication administration, and display signage for a resident on reverse isolation. Despite administering tests, results were not recorded, and an LPN admitted to forgetting documentation. An LPN was observed not performing hand hygiene during medication administration, violating facility policies. Additionally, a resident requiring reverse isolation lacked proper signage, which was corrected after being pointed out.
A facility failed to provide activities aligned with resident preferences, affecting a resident with multiple health conditions who desired more group activities and animal interaction. The activity program policy outlined diverse offerings, but implementation was lacking, with limited group activities and reliance on individual participation. Budget constraints and staffing issues contributed to the deficiency, and the Activity Director had not accessed the policy.
A facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, resulting in an 8% error rate. An LPN administered Senna instead of the prescribed Senna docusate and did not administer Glycolax to a resident, despite signing it off as given. The facility's policy requires verification of the right medication, dosage, and administration before signing the MAR, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Complete Required TB Screening for New Staff and Newly Admitted Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its Tuberculosis (TB) Control Plan for both new employees and newly admitted residents. The facility’s policy required all new employees to receive the first step of a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) prior to beginning employment, and all newly admitted residents to receive the first step of a two-step TST upon admission. Record review of a newly hired housekeeper’s employee file showed she was hired on 03/27/26 and had not received TB testing before starting work. In interviews, the housekeeper confirmed she had been working a little over two weeks without having TB testing completed, and an RN verified that the housekeeper had not received a TST on hire. The Human Resources Director described the process for new hires, stating she provided a form to nursing to complete both steps of TB testing and that nursing was to return the completed form, but acknowledged she had not had time to audit employee files due to high staff turnover. The facility also failed to complete timely TB testing for a newly admitted resident. The medical record for Resident #7 showed an admission date of 03/19/26 with diagnoses including heart failure, acute respiratory failure, hypertension, and difficulty walking. The MAR indicated the resident was scheduled to receive Tubersol (TST) on admission, but nursing staff documented a code instructing review of nursing progress notes instead of administration. A nursing progress note on 03/20/26 documented that Tubersol was unavailable and the facility was awaiting pharmacy, and that the physician was made aware. There was no further documentation in the MAR or progress notes from 03/20/26 through 04/14/26 showing that the resident received the TST. An RN confirmed the resident did not have the TST administered on admission and that there was no follow-up to ensure the facility obtained Tubersol from the pharmacy, resulting in the resident missing the initial admission TB test for an extended period.
Incomplete and Untimely Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed timely for five residents. Facility policy required a comprehensive care plan for each resident within seven days of completion of the MDS assessment, and the care plan was to be based on the resident’s comprehensive assessment and developed by an interdisciplinary team. Record review, staff interviews, and policy review showed that care plans were missing specific required focuses for hospice services, smoking, elopement risk, and PICC/central line care. Resident #7 was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, senile degeneration of the brain, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. The admission MDS showed the resident was cognitively impaired and receiving hospice services. The interim care plan noted hospice/end of life care, but the comprehensive care plan did not include a hospice care plan. An LPN stated hospice residents should have a hospice order and care plan in the chart, and the DON confirmed the hospice care plan was absent until it was added during a later care plan audit. Resident #18 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, COPD, type I diabetes, and anxiety. The interim care plan stated the resident was not a current smoker, and the comprehensive care plan did not include a smoking care plan. A later smoking assessment found the resident was safe to smoke with supervision, and the DON confirmed the smoking care plan had been absent until added during a care plan audit. Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses including UTI, stroke, cognitive communication deficit, insomnia, and anxiety; an elopement assessment identified the resident as high risk for elopement, and physician orders included elopement precautions, but the care plan lacked elopement interventions. Resident #24 was admitted with pneumonia, UTI, heart failure, bacteremia, and respiratory failure; physician orders included PICC dressing changes and measurements, but the care plan lacked PICC-related interventions. Resident #16 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including cellulitis, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, kidney injury, heart disease, heart failure, thrombosis, sleep apnea, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, anemia, and cannabis abuse; observation showed a central line/PICC in place, but the care plan did not include a focus of care for the line, and the DON confirmed the absence of PICC-related care planning.
Failure to Protect Resident Dignity with Urinal and Foley Bag
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to respect resident dignity by leaving a urinal half full of urine in full view of the hallway in Resident #16’s room. Resident #16 was admitted with diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, kidney injury, heart disease, heart failure, chronic embolism and thrombosis, obstructive sleep apnea, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, anemia, and cannabis abuse. The resident’s MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 15, indicating cognitive intactness, and the resident required some assistance with ADLs. During observation, the urinal was seen on the over-the-bed table and remained there while an LPN passed by the room and did not empty it, which was later confirmed by both the resident and the LPN. The facility also failed to maintain dignity for Resident #3 by leaving a Foley catheter drainage bag uncovered and exposed in the room. Resident #3 had diagnoses including COPD, muscle wasting, unsteadiness, dysphagia, history of UTI, depression, metabolic encephalopathy, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate, and the MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had a Foley catheter for urinary elimination. An observation confirmed the catheter bag was half full and uncovered, and the LPN confirmed it was exposed to the room before later covering it. The DON stated that urinals should not be left in view of the hallway and that Foley catheter drainage bags should be covered at all times to protect resident dignity, and the facility policy stated that demeaning practices compromising dignity were prohibited, including keeping urinary bags covered.
Incomplete Baseline Care Plan for Oxygen and Wound Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a complete and accurate baseline care plan for Resident #25 within 48 hours of admission. The resident was admitted on 01/14/26 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. The admission note documented a bony prominence to the sacrum that was reddened but not open, and house zinc was applied to the area. The resident’s MDS dated 01/15/26 showed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognitive functioning, and also noted the resident required stand-by assistance for bed mobility and could not ambulate without assistance. Review of the care plan dated 01/14/26 showed no evidence of oxygen care planning or interventions and no evidence of wound care planning or interventions. Review of January 2026 orders showed no oxygen or wound care orders on admission. Vital sign documentation showed oxygen levels were taken daily from 01/14/26 through 01/21/26, and the resident was wearing oxygen on all days except 01/14/26 and 01/15/26. During an interview on 01/21/26, an LPN confirmed the care plan did not contain interventions for wound care or oxygen and confirmed the resident used oxygen and required care for a pressure ulcer.
PICC Dressing Not Changed as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a PICC line dressing was changed as ordered for one resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, heart failure, bacteremia, and respiratory failure, and was documented as moderately cognitively impaired. The physician ordered on 01/16/26 that the PICC dressing and caps be changed per protocol, but the TAR from 01/14/26 through 01/21/26 did not show documentation that the dressing was changed. During observations on 01/21/26, the resident’s PICC dressing was still dated 01/13/26 at 10:22 A.M., 2:42 P.M., and 4:33 P.M. An interview with the Covering DON at 4:39 P.M. confirmed PICC dressings should be changed every seven days and that the dressing should have been changed on 01/20/26. The facility policy stated central venous catheter dressings are changed every five to seven days to prevent catheter-related infections, and the care plan did not include a central line focus or interventions.
Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized pressure ulcer prevention program for a resident admitted with a reddened bony prominence to the sacrum. On admission, the resident had diagnoses including COPD, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. The record showed the sacral area was reddened but not open, and house zinc was applied. No wound care orders were written on admission, and the baseline care plan did not include wound care planning or interventions. The resident’s MDS showed a BIMS score of 13, indicating cognitive intactness, and the resident was documented as spending a majority of time sitting upright in bed. Progress notes later documented the coccyx as red and blanchable, with continued use of barrier cream and encouragement to turn and reposition, but there was no documented evidence that these interventions were implemented. Skilled nursing charting over several days indicated no open skin areas, and no wound care orders appeared in the record until after the skin condition worsened. A Braden Scale completed four days after admission scored the resident at 16, indicating risk for pressure ulcer development. The resident was observed sitting on a cushion while in bed and stated she could not lie side to side because of breathing issues. The nurse educated the resident not to sit on the cushion in bed and cleansed the area with NSS and applied a dry dressing after noting the skin injury. By the time the wound assessments were completed, the resident had developed a Stage II pressure ulcer on the coccyx, a Stage II pressure ulcer on the right buttocks, and a suspected deep tissue injury on the left buttocks, all documented as acquired on the same date. The assessments described measurements, pink peri-wound skin, and treatments using NSS, Calazime, and dressings. The H&P failed to identify or address the resident’s skin condition or any need for pressure ulcer prevention or treatment. During observation, the resident was lying flat on her back on a standard mattress with the head of bed elevated, and no staff intervention was made to encourage side-lying during the observation period. The DON confirmed that pressure-relieving interventions, including a pressure relieving mattress, were not in place until after the ulcers had declined.
Missing oxygen orders for two residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained for oxygen administration for two residents reviewed for oxygen use. One resident had diagnoses including asthma, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, depression, parkinsonism, rheumatoid arthritis, and muscle wasting, and her care plan included oxygen therapy at 1 to 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula for ineffective gas exchange. During observation, she was receiving oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute and reported she was supposed to be on 3 liters, but the current MAR did not contain an oxygen order or flow rate. An LPN confirmed the oxygen flow rate during the observation and then found there were no oxygen orders in the record. The second resident had diagnoses including COPD, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Observation showed the resident on 1.5 liters of oxygen per minute via nasal cannula, and charting over several days documented oxygen use and daily oxygen level checks. However, the medical record contained no oxygen orders, and the care plan did not include oxygen care planning or interventions. The LPN confirmed there were no oxygen orders in the record. The facility policy titled Oxygen Administration stated staff should verify a physician order for oxygen and review the resident care plan before applying oxygen.
Infection Control Failures During Wound Care, Incontinence Care, and Blood Glucose Testing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow proper infection control processes during wound care for Resident #25. Resident #25 was admitted with diagnoses including COPD, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, and had a BIMS score of 13 indicating intact cognitive functioning. During observed wound care, an LPN performed hand hygiene and applied clean gloves, then lowered the bed and adjusted the resident’s clothing, but removed the soiled dressing without first performing hand hygiene and changing gloves. The wound was then cleansed and the new dressing applied without hand hygiene or glove changes. The LPN later confirmed she should have adjusted the bed and clothing first, then performed hand hygiene and donned gloves before starting wound care. She also acknowledged that hand hygiene should have been performed again after removing the soiled dressing and that new gloves should have been applied before continuing wound care and applying the new dressing. The facility policy on hand hygiene stated staff should perform hand hygiene after contact with a resident’s intact skin, after handling used dressings, after contact with objects in the resident’s immediate vicinity, and after removing PPE. The dressing policy directed staff to wash hands, apply clean gloves, remove the soiled dressing, discard gloves, wash hands again, and then continue with clean technique. The facility also failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident #3 during incontinence care and blood glucose testing. Resident #3 had diagnoses including COPD, muscle wasting, unsteadiness, dysphagia, history of UTI, depression, metabolic encephalopathy, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate, and had a Foley catheter with a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate problems with thinking and memory. EBP signage at the resident’s room indicated staff were to don gowns and gloves for personal care involving an indwelling medical device, but an LPN provided bowel incontinence care wearing gloves only and no gown. During blood glucose testing, the same LPN removed gloves and reapplied new gloves multiple times without hand hygiene, and did not wear a gown during the high-contact care activity. The LPN confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and acknowledged that a gown was not worn during care for the resident on EBP.
Medication Administration Error: Gabapentin Given to Wrong Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered Gabapentin 600 mg, which was prescribed for one resident, to another resident in error. The resident who received the medication in error had an active order for Gabapentin 800 mg to be given four times daily, but instead received a one-time dose of 600 mg, which was not their prescribed dose at that time. The LPN recognized the error, contacted the physician, and obtained a one-time order for the 600 mg dose for nerve pain, but the medication originally belonged to another resident. The incident involved two residents: one with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare, cerebral palsy, and anxiety disorder, and another with hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bipolar disorder. The error was confirmed through interviews with the LPN and the Director of Nursing (DON), who acknowledged that the Gabapentin 600 mg administered to the first resident was actually intended for the second resident. This event was identified during a review of medication administration records and staff interviews.
Unqualified Activities Director Lacks Required Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Activities Director was qualified to lead the activities program, which had the potential to affect all 23 residents. The personnel file of the Activities Director, who also served as the Social Services Designee, showed no evidence of completion of a certification or training program for leading activities in long-term care centers. The Activities Director was the only activities staff member at the facility, and there was uncertainty about the training she received. The Human Resources Director was unsure of the training provided, and the Administrator confirmed that the only training received was a one-week session led by the former staff member who previously held the role. The Administrator admitted that the Activities Director had not been enrolled in a professional training program because the facility was seeking the cheapest option. Additionally, the Administrator was unaware that the Activities Director was hired with the condition that oversight would be provided by a qualified professional until the required training was completed. It was verified that the Activities Director had not received the necessary oversight for the activities programs at the facility.
Inadequate Oversight and Training of Activities Director
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Administrator failed to provide adequate oversight in the hiring and promotion of staff, specifically concerning the Activities Director, who also served as the Social Services Designee. The Activities Director was hired without evidence of completion of a certification or training program for leading activities in long-term care centers. The Administrator admitted to not enrolling the Activities Director in a training program due to budget constraints and was unaware of the requirement for oversight by a qualified activities professional. This lack of oversight and training had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the activities offered, as noted in resident council meeting minutes. They requested more movie nights and exercise activities, but the activity calendar did not reflect these preferences. The Activities Director followed previous activity patterns without significant changes, and activities such as puzzles, leisure time, and brain teasers were largely independent and not actively facilitated. The facility's policy required a variety of activities to meet residents' needs, but these were not consistently provided. Interviews with residents and staff revealed that the Activities Director struggled to balance her dual roles and that the facility's budget limited the scope of activities. Some residents preferred individual activities, while others desired more group activities. The Therapeutic Behavioral Support Specialist noted that the Activities Director did not always have time to fulfill both her social service and activity responsibilities. The facility's activity programs policy outlined a comprehensive approach to resident engagement, but the Activities Director was unaware of this policy, indicating a lack of communication and training within the facility.
Failure to Conduct Annual Facility Assessment Review
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct an annual review of its facility-wide assessment, which is necessary to determine the resources required for competent resident care during both routine operations and emergencies. The last review of the facility assessment was conducted on January 26, 2023, and had not been updated for 18 months, affecting all 23 residents in the facility. Additionally, the assessment inaccurately listed the facility's social worker as being licensed by the State of Ohio. During an interview on July 24, 2024, the Administrator confirmed that the facility assessment had not been reviewed since January 2023 and was in the process of developing a new format for the 2024 assessment. It was also verified that the list of individuals responsible for the annual review was outdated, as the listed Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, and resident representative were no longer employed at the facility.
Infection Control and Documentation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly document the results of tuberculin skin tests for new employees, as evidenced by the personnel files of several State Tested Nurse Aides (STNAs). Despite the administration of the tests on specified dates, the results were not recorded in the employee files, which is a requirement according to the facility's policy. Interviews with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the oversight, with the LPN admitting to forgetting to document the results. Additionally, the facility did not ensure proper hand hygiene during medication administration. An LPN was observed administering medication to residents without performing hand hygiene after touching items in the environment. This action was contrary to the facility's policies on administering medications and hand hygiene, which require staff to follow infection control procedures to prevent the spread of infections. The facility also failed to display appropriate signage for a resident requiring reverse isolation due to being immunocompromised from chemotherapy. Although personal protective equipment was available in the resident's room, there was no signage indicating the need for enhanced barrier precautions. An LPN confirmed the oversight and subsequently placed the necessary sign on the resident's door after being informed of the deficiency.
Inadequate Activity Program Implementation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide activities in accordance with resident preferences, affecting one resident directly and potentially impacting others. Resident #21, who has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, generalized muscle weakness, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, expressed a desire for more group activities and interaction with animals. Despite her preferences for group activities and outdoor time, the facility primarily offered bingo as the only group activity, with limited other options. The activity logs showed participation in bingo and some individual activities, but Resident #21 expressed a desire for more variety and engagement. The facility's activity program policy, revised in August 2006, outlined a comprehensive plan for activities that included cardiovascular, intellectual, outdoor, and creative activities, among others. However, the implementation of this policy was lacking. The activity calendar showed limited group activities, and many scheduled activities were not pertinent to the residents' interests or were designed for individual participation. The Activity Director acknowledged the lack of animal-related activities and the limited variety of group activities, despite the policy's requirements for diverse and frequent offerings. Interviews with other residents and family members revealed similar concerns. Some residents expressed disinterest in the available activities, while others, like Resident #19, faced barriers such as hearing and vision difficulties that made participation challenging. The facility's budget constraints and staffing issues were noted as contributing factors to the limited activity offerings. The Activity Director admitted to not having read or accessed the facility's activity program policy, indicating a disconnect between policy and practice.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds 5%
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%, resulting in an 8% error rate. This deficiency was identified during an observation of medication administration to a resident. An LPN administered two tablets of Senna instead of the prescribed Senna docusate and failed to administer Glycolax, although it was signed off as given. The physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that the resident was to receive Senna docusate and Glycolax at 8:00 A.M. The facility's policy requires medications to be administered according to orders, with the individual administering the medication verifying the right resident, medication, dosage, time, and route before administration and initialing the MAR after each medication is given. The LPN confirmed the error during an interview, acknowledging the incorrect administration of medications.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 500 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Minerva
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arbors At Minerva | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Louisville Gardens Care Center | 8.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Carroll Healthcare Center Inc | 10.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Bel Air Care Center | 11.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Canterbury Villa Of Alliance | 12.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Minerva Rehabilitation And Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.