Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Laurels Of Worthington, The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Staff did not consistently wear required PPE, such as N-95 masks, gowns, gloves, and eye protection, when caring for residents with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. For example, a CNA wore only a surgical mask while caring for a resident in a room with a COVID-19 positive individual, and two LPNs entered the room of a COVID-19 positive resident without N-95 masks or eye protection, contrary to facility policy.
The facility failed to manage and notify responsible parties about resident funds exceeding Medicaid limits for four residents with dementia. Despite repeated account balances surpassing the Medicaid threshold, there was no evidence of notifications being sent or acknowledged. The Business Office Manager confirmed the lack of documentation and plans to address the excess funds, citing communication issues with families.
The facility did not provide a homelike environment for 27 residents in the memory care unit by serving meals on trays in the dining room. An LPN stated this method helped residents identify their food, but the DON confirmed it did not stop residents from taking food from each other's trays. The facility had no relevant policy.
The facility failed to provide timely assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for several residents, including nail care and feeding. A resident with dementia had long, dirty nails, while another with Alzheimer's was left unfed for an extended period. Similarly, a resident with severe dementia was not fed promptly, and another with osteoarthritis was unsupervised during meals. Staff interviews confirmed the need for maximal assistance, which was not adequately provided.
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for four residents, affecting their engagement and quality of life. Residents with severe cognitive impairments were not documented as participating in activities, despite care plans emphasizing the need for sensory stimulation and one-on-one interactions. Observations showed residents spending time without entertainment, and staff interviews highlighted challenges in identifying suitable activities and staffing issues.
The facility failed to ensure that two residents had access to call lights, as observed during a survey. One resident with congestive heart failure and Alzheimer's was found without the call light within reach, and another resident with dementia and COPD also had an inaccessible call light. Both instances were confirmed by an STNA, highlighting a deficiency in accommodating residents' needs.
A resident with a cognitive deficit experienced a change in condition due to a UTI, leading to a new medication order for Cipro. The facility failed to notify the resident's guardian of these changes, contrary to its policy. This deficiency was confirmed by the DON, who acknowledged the lack of notification.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including dementia and chronic kidney disease, did not receive necessary podiatry services as ordered by a physician. The resident's family reported concerns about long toenails and corns, which were confirmed upon observation. The facility lacked documentation of offering ancillary services to the resident's family, resulting in the resident not seeing a podiatrist.
The facility failed to ensure the use of splints and palm protectors for two residents with contractures, leading to a deficiency. One resident with a history of cerebrovascular accident was observed without a splint or palm protector, despite having orders for these devices. Another resident with Alzheimer's disease had no documentation of splint use, and the plan of care did not address the contracture. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and documentation regarding the use of splints, and the facility lacked a policy on splint/brace use.
A resident at risk for falls, with severe cognitive impairment and requiring substantial assistance, was observed without non-skid socks, contrary to her care plan. Staff confirmed the absence of non-skid socks, despite the facility's fall management policy requiring such interventions to minimize fall risks.
A resident with Alzheimer's and overactive bladder did not receive timely incontinence care, as observed over a period of several hours. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for personal care, was found with a moderately saturated brief. Facility policy required timely care, which was not provided in this instance.
A resident with a complex medical history was observed attempting to manage her colostomy without gloves, resulting in feces on her fingers, lap, and shirt, and a strong odor in the hallway. The resident confirmed that she preferred to perform colostomy care at her bedside, but no supplies were available in her bedside table drawers. A nurse confirmed the resident's education on colostomy care and the absence of supplies.
A facility failed to obtain daily weights and post-dialysis communication forms for a resident requiring dialysis. Despite a care plan addressing the resident's risk for hypovolemia, weights were not taken on multiple occasions, and communication forms were missing. The DON confirmed these lapses, which violated the facility's hemodialysis policy.
A resident with PTSD, stemming from Vietnam War experiences and the recent loss of his wife, did not receive trauma-informed care at the facility. Despite the PTSD diagnosis being documented, there was no evidence of care plans or monitoring for PTSD triggers. The resident declined psychological services, and the facility failed to document trauma-informed interventions or evaluations.
The facility failed to monitor adverse reactions for anticoagulants, diuretics, and insulin for two residents. One resident's care plan lacked documentation for monitoring side effects, while another resident received pain medications without parameters for administration based on pain levels. Non-pharmacological interventions were inconsistently used, leading to deficiencies in medication management.
The facility failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications for two residents, despite having care plans that required such monitoring. One resident with schizoaffective disorder and another with anxiety and depression were not observed for potential adverse reactions to their medications. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation for monitoring side effects, leading to a deficiency in care.
A resident with multiple health conditions, including end-stage renal failure, did not receive physician-ordered Albumin and Pre-albumin tests every other week. The DON initially thought the dialysis company was responsible for these tests, but later confirmed they were not conducted.
The facility experienced a ten percent medication error rate, affecting two residents. One resident did not receive Diclofenac gel due to unavailability, while another received crushed medications that should not have been crushed, including Divalproex sodium and enteric-coated aspirin. The errors were confirmed by the LPN and DON, indicating non-compliance with medication administration policies.
A significant medication error occurred when an LPN crushed timed-release medications for a resident, despite facility guidelines indicating these medications should not be crushed. The resident was prescribed Divalproex sodium and enteric-coated aspirin, both of which were administered inappropriately. The DON confirmed the error, noting that the facility's policy and medication list clearly state these medications should not be crushed.
Failure to Ensure Proper PPE Use for COVID-19 Precautions
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for residents with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection. In one instance, a certified nursing assistant was observed providing care to a resident in a shared room where one occupant was COVID-19 positive, but the CNA wore only a surgical mask and did not use a gown, N-95 respirator, or gloves as required. The CNA confirmed awareness of the resident's COVID-19 status and acknowledged that enhanced PPE should have been used due to the exposure risk to other residents in the room. The Infection Control Preventionist also confirmed that only the correct isolation signage should have been posted and that staff were expected to follow contact and droplet isolation protocols. In another instance, two LPNs entered the room of a resident who had tested positive for COVID-19, wearing only surgical masks, gloves, and gowns, but without N-95 respirators or eye protection. The Infection Control Preventionist confirmed that the nurses should have been wearing N-95 masks and either goggles or a face shield when providing care. Facility policy required the use of all recommended COVID-19 PPE, including N-95 masks, eye protection, gloves, and gowns, for residents under observation or transmission-based precautions. These failures were identified during observations and interviews, and the facility's policy was not followed as written.
Failure to Manage Resident Funds Exceeding Medicaid Limits
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper management and notification of resident funds exceeding Medicaid limits for four residents receiving Medicaid benefits. The deficiency was identified through staff interviews and record reviews, revealing that the facility did not have verification of receipt for spenddown notifications nor a plan to manage the excess funds. This issue affected four residents out of five reviewed for personal funds, with the facility census being 91. Resident #48, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and dementia, had a primary payor source of Medicaid. Her account balance consistently exceeded the Medicaid limit from March to October 2024, with no evidence that notifications were sent to or acknowledged by the responsible party. The Business Office Manager (BOM) confirmed the lack of evidence and reported difficulties in contacting the resident's family, with no plan in place to spend down the account. Similarly, Resident #58, also with dementia, had an account balance exceeding Medicaid limits from March to October 2024, without evidence of notification to the responsible party. The BOM acknowledged previous discussions with the resident's family about spending down the funds but could not specify when. Residents #43 and #25 also had account balances exceeding Medicaid limits, with no evidence of notification or acknowledgment by their responsible parties. The BOM reported that the families of these residents typically instructed him on how to spend down the funds, but no formal plan or documentation was in place.
Failure to Ensure Homelike Dining Environment in Memory Care Unit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 27 residents in the memory care unit by serving meals on trays in the dining room. This practice was observed during a lunch meal, where all residents in the dining room received their meals on trays. An LPN confirmed that meals were served this way to help residents recognize their food. However, the Director of Nursing acknowledged that serving food on trays did not prevent residents from taking food from each other's trays. The facility lacked a relevant policy addressing this issue.
Failure to Provide Timely Assistance with ADLs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate and timely assistance with activities of daily living, specifically nail care and eating, for residents who required such assistance. Resident #30, diagnosed with dementia and peripheral vascular disease, was observed with long, dirty, and curled fingernails on multiple occasions. Interviews with staff confirmed that Resident #30 required maximal assistance with personal hygiene, and the plan of care did not accurately reflect his needs. Resident #55, who has Alzheimer's disease and is dependent on staff for eating, was left unfed for an extended period during lunch. Observations revealed that staff were occupied with other residents and cleaning tasks, delaying the feeding of Resident #55. Similarly, Resident #11, with severe dementia and requiring substantial assistance with eating, was also left unfed for a significant time, with staff unsure of the location of her meal tray. Resident #61, diagnosed with dementia and osteoarthritis, required assistance with meals but was observed unsupervised with a meal tray. His fingernails were also long and dirty. Interviews revealed that Resident #61 sometimes refused assistance, but when prompted and cued, his food intake improved. The facility's policy for CNA/STNA practice includes assisting residents with activities of daily living such as feeding and nail care, which was not adequately followed in these cases.
Failure to Provide Adequate Resident Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for four residents, affecting their engagement and quality of life. Resident #30, with severe cognitive and visual impairments, was not documented as participating in any activities from 10/01/24 to 10/29/24, despite having a care plan that included various interests such as music therapy and outdoor activities. Observations revealed that Resident #30 spent significant time in the common area without any activities or entertainment, and staff interviews confirmed a lack of engagement opportunities. Resident #55, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and rarely understood, also did not participate in activities during the same period. Her care plan emphasized the need for sensory stimulation and one-on-one interactions, yet there was no evidence of such activities being offered. Observations showed her spending time in bed without entertainment, and staff interviews highlighted the challenges in identifying suitable activities for residents with limited communication abilities. Similarly, Resident #11, with severe dementia and psychotic disturbances, was not engaged in activities despite a care plan that recommended sensory stimulation and one-on-one interactions. Observations indicated that she spent time curled up in bed or in the common area without activities. Resident #72, with Alzheimer's disease and severe cognitive impairment, was also not offered activities during the observed period. Staff interviews revealed staffing challenges that hindered the consistent provision of activities, and documentation did not reflect the residents' participation or refusal of activities.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents had access to call lights, affecting two residents. Resident #5, who was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and Alzheimer's disease, was observed on 10/31/24 at 2:00 P.M. lying in bed without the call light within reach. The call light was wrapped around the bed post, making it inaccessible to the resident. Resident #5's care plan indicated that the resident was deaf and required incontinence care every two hours. An interview with a State tested Nurse Aide (STNA) confirmed that the call light was not within reach for Resident #5. Similarly, Resident #58, admitted with diagnoses including dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was observed on the same day at 2:10 P.M. also without the call light within reach. The call light was similarly wrapped around the bed post, rendering it inaccessible. Resident #58's care plan noted a functional ability deficit and required the call light to be within reach. An STNA verified that the call light was not accessible to Resident #58. These observations indicate a failure to accommodate the needs and preferences of the residents by not ensuring access to call lights.
Failure to Notify Guardian of Change in Condition and Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the guardian of a resident with a moderate cognitive deficit of a change in condition and a new medication order. The resident, who had a history of memory deficit following a cerebral infarct, was admitted with a complaint of pain during urination. A Nurse Practitioner ordered tests, which revealed a urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by klebsiella oxytoca. Consequently, an order for the antibiotic Cipro was made to treat the UTI. Despite the facility's policy requiring notification of the resident's representative in such cases, there was no documented evidence that the resident's guardian was informed of the change in condition or the new medication order. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the guardian had not been notified. The facility's policy mandates that any significant change in a resident's status, including new treatment orders, must be communicated to the resident's representative and documented in the medical record.
Failure to Arrange Podiatry Services for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to arrange podiatry services for a resident, identified as Resident #61, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective disorder, osteoarthritis, and muscle weakness. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment indicated that the resident was rarely or never understood. A physician's order dated 06/26/24 required a podiatry evaluation and treatment as indicated, but the medical record lacked ancillary consents or evidence of a podiatry consult. The resident's family expressed concern about the resident's long toenails, which were causing discomfort by rubbing on the sheets, and the presence of corns on the resident's feet. An observation confirmed the resident had long, dry, and crumbly nails. The Director of Social Services (DSS) acknowledged that residents were typically offered ancillary services upon admission, but there was no documentation that the resident's son had been offered these services, and the resident had not seen a podiatrist.
Failure to Provide Splints and Palm Protectors for Residents with Contractures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for residents with contractures, specifically by not ensuring the use of splints and palm protectors to prevent worsening of contractures. Resident #1, who had a history of cerebrovascular accident with right-sided hemiplegia and other conditions, was observed without a splint or palm protector on the contracted right hand. Despite having orders for these devices, there was no documentation of refusal by the resident, and staff were unaware of the resident's need for these devices. The splint was found in a drawer, and no palm protector was available in the room. Resident #55, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and other conditions, also did not have a splint or brace for the contracted left hand, despite recommendations from occupational therapy. The resident's medical records lacked documentation of orders for splints, and the plan of care did not address the contracture or need for splints. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the use of splints, and it was noted that the resident had a history of noncompliance with splints, but this was not documented. The facility lacked a policy on splint/brace use, and there was no documentation of follow-up on therapy recommendations for Resident #55. Observations confirmed the contractures, and staff interviews highlighted a lack of communication and documentation regarding the implementation of splint use. The deficiency was identified through observations, medical record reviews, and staff interviews, indicating a failure to provide necessary care to prevent the worsening of contractures in these residents.
Failure to Implement Fall Interventions for At-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement fall interventions for a resident identified as being at risk for falls. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with daily activities, was observed without non-skid socks on multiple occasions. This was despite the care plan specifying the need for non-skid footwear as a fall prevention measure. The resident's medical history included conditions such as cerebral aneurysm, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and epilepsy, which contributed to her fall risk. During observations, staff confirmed that the resident did not have the required non-skid socks on, which was a deviation from the facility's fall management policy. The policy outlined the necessity of providing adequate supervision and assistive devices to minimize fall risks. Interviews with staff members, including a State Tested Nurse Aide and a Unit Manager, verified the absence of the non-skid socks, acknowledging the resident's fall risk status.
Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident who was dependent on staff for personal care. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, overactive bladder, and major depressive disorder, was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with various activities of daily living. The care plan indicated that the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity due to frequent bowel and bladder incontinence, among other factors. Interventions included regular skin assessments and timely incontinence care. During an observation period from 9:05 A.M. to 1:34 P.M., the resident did not receive any personal care, including incontinence care. At 1:35 P.M., two State Tested Nurse Aides (STNAs) provided incontinence care and verified that the resident's brief was moderately saturated with urine. One of the STNAs confirmed that the resident had not been checked or changed since before 9:00 A.M. that morning. The facility's policy required timely incontinence care according to each resident's needs, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Lack of Colostomy Supplies for Resident Self-Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident had the necessary colostomy supplies available for self-care, affecting one resident reviewed for colostomy care. The resident, who had a complex medical history including surgical aftercare following digestive system surgery, chronic heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, was observed attempting to empty her colostomy bag without gloves, resulting in feces on her fingers, lap, and shirt. A strong odor of feces was noted in the hallway during this observation. The resident confirmed that she preferred to perform colostomy care at her bedside and that staff typically kept supplies in her bedside table drawers. However, upon inspection, no colostomy care supplies were available in the drawers. A registered nurse confirmed that the resident had been educated on colostomy care and was managing it independently as much as possible, but also confirmed the absence of supplies at the bedside.
Failure to Ensure Dialysis Care Compliance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that daily weights were obtained and post-dialysis communication forms were returned for a resident requiring dialysis. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including end-stage renal failure and dependence on renal dialysis, was at risk for hypovolemia related to dialysis. The plan of care included obtaining daily weights and post-dialysis communication, but these were not consistently documented or performed as ordered. Specifically, the facility did not obtain the resident's weight at 6:00 A.M. on multiple dates, and there were numerous instances where post-dialysis communication forms were missing. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the daily weights and post-dialysis communication forms were not completed as required. The facility's policy on hemodialysis, which was last revised in September 2023, mandates the completion of communication forms before and after each dialysis session. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, resulting in a deficiency in providing appropriate dialysis care and services for the resident.
Failure to Provide Trauma-Informed Care for Resident with PTSD
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide trauma-informed and culturally competent care for a resident diagnosed with PTSD, among other medical conditions. The resident, who served as a medic in the Vietnam War, experienced re-triggered nightmares and sadness following the death of his wife in 2023. Despite the PTSD diagnosis being documented in the resident's medical records, there was no evidence of trauma-informed care or treatment for PTSD in the care plan, orders, diagnosis list, or MDS. The resident was offered psychological services but declined, and the facility did not document any trauma-informed care interventions or evaluations for PTSD triggers. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the PTSD diagnosis was not included in the admission diagnosis list, and there were no care plans or monitoring orders for the resident's PTSD. The social worker, who was new at the time of the resident's admission, completed a PTSD evaluation but did not follow the correct documentation procedure. The resident did not receive an initial psychological evaluation until several weeks after admission, and ongoing triggers related to his Vietnam War experiences and his wife's passing were not addressed in the facility's care plan.
Deficiencies in Medication Monitoring and Pain Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper monitoring for adverse reactions and side effects related to the use of anticoagulants, diuretics, and insulin for two residents. Resident #36, who had multiple diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes, was prescribed medications such as apixaban, aspirin, insulin, and Lasix. However, the physician's orders did not include directions for monitoring adverse reactions or side effects associated with these medications. The care plan for Resident #36 included interventions to observe and report signs of complications, but the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no documentation of monitoring for side effects. Resident #82, with diagnoses including spinal stenosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was prescribed Oxycodone and Tylenol for pain management. The medication administration records showed that both medications were administered for varying pain levels without parameters to guide which medication should be used based on the pain scale. The care plan for Resident #82 included interventions for pain management, but the Registered Nurse confirmed that non-pharmacological interventions were inconsistently used and that there were no parameters attached to the orders to designate which medication to administer. The deficiencies in monitoring and medication administration for both residents highlight a lack of adherence to proper protocols for managing medication side effects and pain management. The absence of specific monitoring instructions and the inconsistent use of non-pharmacological interventions contributed to the facility's failure to ensure the residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary drugs and adverse effects.
Failure to Monitor Psychotropic Medication Side Effects
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor for potential side effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant medication use for two residents, leading to a deficiency in care. Resident #1, who has a complex medical history including cerebrovascular accident, vascular dementia, and schizoaffective disorder, was not monitored for side effects of prescribed psychotropic medications. Despite having a care plan that outlined the need to observe for side effects such as sedation, dizziness, and extrapyramidal symptoms, there was no documented evidence that the facility monitored these potential adverse effects. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation regarding the monitoring of side effects for Resident #1. Similarly, Resident #36, with a medical history of cerebral vascular accident, generalized anxiety disorder, and depression, was also not monitored for side effects of psychotropic medications. The resident's care plan included interventions to observe for side effects of anti-anxiety and antidepressant medications, such as drowsiness, confusion, and suicidal ideations. However, the facility did not document any monitoring of these side effects or the implementation of behavioral interventions. The Director of Nursing verified the absence of documentation for monitoring side effects and behaviors related to psychotropic drug use for Resident #36. The deficiency was identified through a review of medical records and staff interviews, which revealed that the facility did not adhere to its own care plans and policies regarding the monitoring of psychotropic medication side effects. This oversight affected the quality of care provided to the residents, as there was no evidence of proactive measures to identify and address potential adverse reactions to the medications prescribed.
Failure to Obtain Physician-Ordered Lab Tests
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered by the physician for a resident, affecting one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including end-stage renal failure and dependence on renal dialysis, was admitted with an order for Albumin and Pre-albumin levels to be checked every other week. However, a review of the medical record showed no evidence that these tests were completed. During interviews, the Director of Nursing (DON) initially believed that the dialysis company was responsible for obtaining these tests. It was later confirmed by the DON that the ordered tests were not conducted as required.
Medication Administration Errors and Policy Non-Compliance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent, resulting in a ten percent error rate. This was observed during a medication pass where three errors occurred out of 30 opportunities. Two residents were affected by these errors. Resident #38 did not receive Diclofenac sodium external gel as prescribed because it was unavailable in the medication cart. This oversight was confirmed by the LPN responsible for the medication pass. Additionally, Resident #66 received medications inappropriately crushed, which included Divalproex sodium delayed release tablets and enteric-coated aspirin. The LPN administered these medications crushed, despite them being on the facility's 'do not crush' list. The Director of Nursing confirmed that these medications should not have been crushed and that the facility's policy required obtaining medications in a form suitable for residents needing crushed medications. This incident was part of a complaint investigation, highlighting non-compliance with medication administration policies.
Significant Medication Error Due to Crushing Timed-Release Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that timed-release medications were not crushed, resulting in a significant medication error for one resident. Resident #66, who had physician orders for Divalproex sodium delayed-release tablets and enteric-coated aspirin, was affected. During a medication pass, an LPN crushed both the Divalproex sodium and the aspirin, which are on the facility's do-not-crush list, and administered them to the resident. The LPN stated that she crushes medications that are allowed to be crushed and relies on the medication administration record for guidance. However, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility's nursing report sheet indicates which residents require crushed medications and that medications should be obtained in a form that can be crushed if necessary. The facility's policy and the list of medications that should not be crushed were reviewed, confirming that both Divalproex sodium and enteric-coated aspirin should not have been crushed. This incident was investigated under a specific complaint number.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 858 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Worthington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurels Of Norworth The | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Wesley Glen Health Services Corp | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| The Laurels Of Walden Park | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 31 | 0 |
| Worthington Christian Village | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Highbanks Care Center | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Laurels Of Worthington, The.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.