Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Fox Run Manor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with cognitive impairment and a history of agitation was physically restrained in a wheelchair using a gait belt by a CNA, who intended to prevent the resident from standing or falling. The restraint was not authorized by a physician and was not part of the care plan, violating facility policy regarding the use of physical restraints.
A resident with dementia and behavioral symptoms was found physically restrained in a wheelchair with a gait belt by a CNA to prevent standing or falling. Although the incident met the facility's definition of abuse, it was not reported to the State Survey Agency as required, and the event was only investigated internally.
A resident with an indwelling catheter did not receive proper infection control during catheter care when a CNA reused contaminated washcloths from a basin of water, rather than using clean washcloths for each step. This practice was confirmed by both the CNA and the regional nurse, and did not follow facility policy for preventing urinary tract infections.
A facility failed to clarify and implement a physician order for a resident's wound care, resulting in infrequent dressing changes for a surgical wound on the right hip. The resident, who required assistance with daily activities, reported that the dressing was not changed as needed. Observations confirmed the dressing was not changed daily, and the DON acknowledged the order was unclear, leading to improper wound care management.
A facility failed to maintain proper infection control for a resident with a suprapubic catheter. The resident's catheter bag was observed on the floor without a barrier, and catheter tubing was seen dragging on the ground. Staff confirmed these observations, which were contrary to the facility's policy on preventing urinary tract infections.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and dependent on staff for eating was not provided dignified meal assistance. An STNA stood while feeding the resident, interrupted the feeding twice to assist others, and talked to other residents across the dining room. These actions were confirmed by an LPN and the STNA involved.
The facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet residents' needs, resulting in long wait times for call lights and inadequate incontinence care. Multiple residents reported waiting up to two hours for assistance, and staff confirmed they were unable to meet care standards due to frequent call-offs and high resident acuity levels.
The facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during food service and did not monitor food temperatures before serving meals. Dietary aides handled food with gloves, touched non-food items, and continued handling food without washing hands or changing gloves. Additionally, they served hot foods without checking temperatures, unaware of the correct temperature requirements.
The facility failed to serve residents in the dining room in a dignified manner, with residents seated at the same table receiving their meals at different times, leading to unnecessary delays and discomfort.
The facility failed to address resident concerns about the timely response to call lights, affecting four residents. Recurring issues included staff turning off call lights without returning and not answering call lights promptly. These concerns were consistently raised in resident council meetings and communicated to the Administrator.
The facility failed to install call lights in every stall in a common restroom, affecting 13 ambulatory residents. Observations showed that only the largest stall in the women's restroom had a pull-cord, and no pull cord was present in the common bathroom area. Interviews confirmed residents used these restrooms during activities, and the Administrator verified the absence of necessary signage and pull lights.
A resident's call light remained unanswered for over an hour, despite the resident needing assistance with turning off the overhead light and using the bathroom. The delay was due to nursing aides assisting other residents and an RN administering medication.
A resident with heart failure experienced a significant weight loss of 6.56% within a month, but the facility failed to notify the physician as required by policy. This deficiency was confirmed through staff interviews and record reviews.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive baseline care plans for two residents, omitting critical information such as ADLs, skin concerns, and medication usage. Interviews with staff confirmed these deficiencies, and the facility lacked a policy for baseline care plans.
The facility failed to ensure a complete comprehensive care plan for a resident with significant medical conditions, including hemiplegia and hemiparesis. The resident required substantial assistance with ADLs, but the care plan did not include this information. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the deficiency.
The facility failed to update comprehensive care plans timely for two residents. One resident's care plan was not updated with a new intervention for checking and changing briefs every two hours, despite a physician's order. Another resident's care plan was not updated with a new fall intervention until weeks after the incident. The Director of Nursing confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility failed to meet the personal hygiene needs of two residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Both residents were observed with long chin hairs over several days, despite being scheduled for showers. Interviews with staff and residents confirmed that shaving was not consistently performed, indicating a neglect of personal care needs.
A resident with dementia and hypertension experienced a fall, resulting in a contusion and hematoma. The facility failed to review the fall and update the care plan with new interventions until over two weeks later, contrary to their policies requiring immediate investigation and follow-up.
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for two residents, leading to significant discomfort and potential health risks. One resident, with a history of UTI and muscle weakness, was found saturated with urine and feces multiple times, while another resident, who required maximum assistance for ADLs, was left in wet clothing for an extended period. Staff cited high resident-to-staff ratios and demanding assignments as reasons for the delays in care.
The facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate PPE for a resident with ESBL resistance and did not properly manage another resident's catheter bag, which was found lying on the floor. Multiple staff members were observed not following contact precautions, and the facility's policy on indwelling catheters was not adhered to.
The facility failed to post daily nurse staffing data and maintain historical records, potentially affecting all 76 residents. Observations revealed outdated postings, and interviews confirmed the lack of historical data prior to 04/03/24.
Improper Use of Physical Restraint in Wheelchair
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with dementia, agitation, anxiety, and psychotic disorder was physically restrained in a wheelchair using a gait belt. The resident, who required substantial to maximal assistance for mobility and was at risk for wandering or elopement, was found with a gait belt wrapped around the arms of the wheelchair to prevent standing or falling. This action was taken by a CNA after the resident was observed to be restless, hallucinating, combative, and attempting to stand or walk during the night shift. The restraint was not authorized by a physician and was not part of the resident's care plan. The facility's policy states that residents have the right to be free from physical restraints unless authorized by a physician, used in an emergency, or requested by the resident or their representative with informed consent. The CNA involved stated that the intent was to keep the resident safe and was unaware that this constituted improper restraint. The use of the gait belt in this manner restricted the resident's freedom of movement and was not in accordance with facility policy or regulatory requirements.
Failure to Report Alleged Abuse Involving Physical Restraint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency as required by policy and regulation. A resident with dementia, agitation, anxiety, and psychotic disorder with hallucination was found physically restrained in her wheelchair with a gait belt wrapped around the wheelchair arms to prevent her from standing or falling. This action was taken by a CNA after the resident was observed to be restless, hallucinating, combative, and attempting to get out of bed and walk. The restraint was discovered by staff at the start of the first shift, and the gait belt was immediately removed. The resident's family and Medical Director were notified, and a psychosocial assessment was completed with no concerns noted. Despite the incident meeting the facility's policy definition of abuse as an act of unreasonable confinement, the event was not reported to the Ohio Department of Health as an allegation of abuse. The Administrator confirmed that an internal investigation was conducted and the staff member involved was suspended during the investigation, but the incident was not reported externally because the Administrator did not believe the action was intended to be abusive and the resident was not harmed. Review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) confirmed that no report was made to the State Survey Agency regarding this incident.
Improper Infection Control During Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a certified nurse assistant (CNA) failed to perform proper infection control procedures during indwelling catheter care for a resident with a history of malignant neoplasm of the bladder, obstructive and reflux uropathy, urinary tract infection, and infection related to a catheter. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting and had an indwelling catheter as ordered by the physician, with care to be provided every shift. During observation, the CNA used a basin of water and multiple washcloths to clean the catheter and surrounding area. However, the CNA placed used washcloths back into the basin, contaminating the water, and then reused these washcloths for further cleaning and rinsing, rather than using clean washcloths for each step. The CNA confirmed during interview that contaminated washcloths were reused from the same basin, and only two of the three washcloths were used, despite the contamination. The regional nurse also acknowledged ongoing issues with CNAs placing dirty washcloths back into the basin, contaminating the water, and not following proper infection control practices. The facility's policy requires appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections, but the observed practice did not align with these standards.
Failure to Implement Physician Order for Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to clarify and implement a physician order for wound care, affecting a resident with a surgical wound on the right hip. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with daily activities, had a deep tissue injury to the left heel and a wound on the right hip. The physician's order, dated 11/12/24 and 11/13/24, instructed to keep the wound clean and dry, apply a non-prescriber adherent dressing daily, and monitor for signs of infection. However, the order was categorized as a PRN order, and the Treatment Administration Review (TAR) showed the dressing was changed only once on 11/24/24. Interviews and observations revealed that the wound dressing was not changed as frequently as required. The resident reported that the dressing was not always changed as it should be, and an observation confirmed the dressing was dated 11/23/24. The LPN verified the date on the dressing, and the DON acknowledged the physician order was unclear, stating the wound should be open to air with a non-adherent bandage applied for drainage. The DON confirmed that if a dressing was applied, it should be changed daily. This deficiency was investigated under Complaint Number OH00159369.
Inadequate Infection Control for Indwelling Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate infection control measures for a resident with an indwelling catheter. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including chronic multifocal osteomyelitis, a stage 4 pressure ulcer, quadriplegia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, required substantial assistance with daily activities and had a suprapubic catheter. The care plan indicated that the resident insisted on having the catheter bag placed on the floor without a cover, and staff were instructed to place the bag in a basin when on the floor. However, during an observation, the catheter bag was found lying directly on the floor without a basin or barrier. Further observations revealed that the resident was in the common area and hallway in an electric wheelchair with approximately eight inches of catheter tubing dragging along the floor. Interviews with a CNA and the DON confirmed these observations. The facility's policy on indwelling catheters, dated 2017, emphasized the need for appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Dignified Meal Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was provided dignity during meal service. Resident #12, who has severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for eating, was observed during a meal service where the State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #302 stood while feeding the resident. The STNA interrupted the feeding process twice to assist other residents and engaged in conversations with other residents across the dining room while feeding Resident #12. These actions were verified through interviews with both the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #164 and STNA #302, confirming the lack of continuous and focused assistance during the meal service.
Insufficient Staffing Leading to Delayed Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff to timely meet the residents' needs, affecting 13 residents and potentially all 77 residents in the facility. Resident council meeting minutes from three consecutive months revealed ongoing concerns about call lights being turned off without follow-up and long wait times for assistance. Multiple residents reported waiting up to two hours for their call lights to be answered, and some residents resorted to unsafe practices, such as taking themselves to the bathroom, due to the lack of timely assistance. Observations and interviews confirmed that call lights were not being answered promptly. For instance, one resident's call light remained unanswered for over an hour while staff were occupied with other tasks. Another resident was found saturated with urine and feces after not being changed for over five hours, despite the facility's policy of changing residents every two hours. Staff interviews corroborated these findings, indicating that they were often unable to meet the required care standards due to insufficient staffing levels. The facility's assessment revealed a high acuity level among residents, with many requiring extensive care such as Hoyer lifts, incontinence care, and assistance with feeding. Staff reported that they had to prioritize care due to frequent call-offs and the high needs of the residents, particularly on weekends. The facility's staffing issues were further exacerbated by the repeated absence of a specific STNA, leading to additional strain on the remaining staff and further delays in resident care.
Inadequate Hand Hygiene and Food Temperature Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during food service and did not monitor food temperatures before serving meals. Observations revealed that a dietary aide handled food with disposable gloves, touched non-food items, and then continued handling food without washing hands or changing gloves. Another dietary aide was observed making a sandwich and touching non-food items without washing hands or changing gloves. It was noted that there was no handwashing sink available in the kitchenette, and the closest sink was behind a locked door. Interviews with the dietary aides and manager confirmed the lack of handwashing and glove changes, and the absence of a solution to this problem. Additionally, the facility did not monitor food temperatures before serving meals. Observations showed that dietary aides served soup and other hot foods without checking their temperatures. Interviews with the dietary aides revealed that they were unaware of the requirement to check food temperatures and did not know the correct temperatures for serving hot foods. A review of the facility's policy confirmed that hot foods should be served at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher, but the observed temperatures were below this standard. The dietary aides confirmed that they had never checked food temperatures before serving and were unaware of the correct temperature requirements.
Failure to Serve Meals Simultaneously in Dining Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve residents in the dining room in a dignified manner, affecting five residents. Observations on 04/01/24 revealed that residents seated together at tables did not receive their meals simultaneously. For instance, Resident #58 received his meal at 11:50 A.M., while Residents #66 and #8, seated at the same table, did not receive their meals until much later. Similarly, Resident #37 received her meal at 12:11 P.M., but Resident #6, seated at the same table, did not receive her meal until 12:39 P.M., after Resident #37 had already finished and left the table. Another instance involved Resident #54 receiving her meal at 12:13 P.M., while Resident #18, seated at the same table, expressed hunger and did not receive her meal until 12:29 P.M. Interviews with staff confirmed the discrepancies in meal service times. STNA #272 acknowledged that residents seated at the same table should be served simultaneously. The observations and interviews indicate a failure to provide a dignified dining experience for the residents, as they were left waiting for their meals while others at the same table were served and finished eating. This lack of coordination in meal service led to residents experiencing unnecessary delays and discomfort during mealtime.
Failure to Address Resident Concerns on Call Light Response
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident concerns were resolved timely, specifically regarding the response to call lights. This deficiency affected four residents who regularly attended the resident council meetings. Review of the resident council meeting minutes from January, February, and March 2024 revealed recurring concerns about nurses and state tested nursing aides (STNAs) turning off call lights, promising to return but failing to do so, and not answering call lights promptly. Interviews with residents confirmed these issues, with one resident stating they had to take themselves to the bathroom due to the lack of staff response. The Activities Director confirmed that these concerns were consistently brought up in resident council meetings and communicated to the Administrator after each meeting.
Lack of Call Lights in Common Restroom Stalls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were installed in every stall in a common restroom, potentially affecting 13 ambulatory residents who could self-transfer. Observations revealed that the women's restroom had three stalls, but only the largest stall had a pull-cord installed, while the two smaller stalls did not. Additionally, no pull cord was present in the common bathroom area. Interviews with residents confirmed that they used the common bathroom during activities, and the Administrator in Training verified the absence of pull lights in the male restroom's stalls. The Administrator confirmed that no signage was posted outside the public restrooms indicating they were not for resident use, and only the largest stall in the women's restroom had a pull cord installed.
Delayed Response to Resident's Call Light
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely respond to a resident's call light, affecting one of 18 residents observed for call lights. Resident #70, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for various activities of daily living due to decreased mobility and incontinence, had their call light on for an unknown amount of time. Continuous observation revealed that the call light remained unanswered for one hour and one minute. During an interview, Resident #70 confirmed they were waiting for assistance with turning off the overhead light and needed to use the bathroom. Registered Nurse #257 verified that the nursing aides were assisting other residents and that they were administering medication, leading to the delay in responding to Resident #70's call light.
Failure to Notify Physician of Significant Weight Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a significant weight change for Resident #27, who was readmitted with diagnoses including acute on chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure. The resident, who was cognitively intact, experienced a 6.56% weight loss from 192.0 pounds to 179.4 pounds within a month. Despite the facility's policy requiring the clinical technician/Registered Dietitian to notify the physician of significant weight changes, there was no documentation indicating that the physician was informed of this weight loss. This deficiency was confirmed through staff interviews and record reviews.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Baseline Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan with the minimum necessary information for two residents. Resident #57, who was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and cerebral infarction, had physician orders for a pressure-reducing cushion, monitoring for signs of bruising/bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy, and dehydration. However, the baseline care plan did not include information related to the resident's activities of daily living (ADLs). Interviews with an LPN and the Director of Nursing confirmed the omission of ADL information in the baseline care plan for Resident #57. Similarly, Resident #332, admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, urinary tract infection, and congestive heart failure, had physician orders for monitoring signs of bruising/bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy and was prescribed multiple medications including apixaban, amitriptyline, and trazodone. The baseline care plan for Resident #332 lacked information on ADLs, skin concerns, and the use of anticoagulant and psychotropic medications. Interviews with an LPN and the Director of Nursing confirmed these omissions. Additionally, the facility administrator stated that there was no policy in place for baseline care plans.
Incomplete Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #57 had a complete comprehensive care plan. Resident #57, who was admitted to the facility on 01/12/24, had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, pain in the right hip bursitis, and cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of the middle cerebral artery. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed that Resident #57 was cognitively intact but had functional limitations in the range of motion in both upper and lower extremities. The resident required substantial assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. However, the current care plan for Resident #57 did not include information related to ADLs. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the deficiency. On 04/02/24, Resident #57 was observed being transferred to a wheelchair using a Hoyer lift by two State tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs). An interview with an LPN confirmed that ADL information should be included in the comprehensive care plan and acknowledged that Resident #57's care plan lacked this information. The Director of Nursing (DON) also confirmed that the current care plan did not address ADLs. The facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated 11/02/16, mandates that a comprehensive person-centered care plan must include measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's needs, including services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This care plan must be developed within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Update Comprehensive Care Plans Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were updated timely for two residents. Resident #56, who was admitted with diagnoses including a urinary tract infection (UTI) and muscle weakness, had a care plan that was not updated with a new intervention for checking and changing briefs every two hours. Despite a physician's order dated 03/31/24, the care plan remained unchanged, leading to the resident expressing concerns about not being changed every two hours and fearing another UTI. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan had not been updated with the new orders after the resident's return from the hospital. Resident #67, admitted with dementia and hypertension, experienced a fall on 03/16/24 and was found with feces on her hands, clothing, and the floor. Despite the interdisciplinary team developing a new intervention for staff to assist with toileting, this intervention was not added to the care plan until 04/02/24. The Director of Nursing verified that the fall intervention was not timely added to the care plan. The facility's policies on fall reduction and comprehensive care plans did not provide guidance on updating care plans after incidents or events.
Failure to Meet Personal Hygiene Needs for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) had their personal care needs met. Resident #10, who was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with personal hygiene, was observed to have numerous grown-out white stubble chin hairs on multiple occasions. Despite being scheduled for showers on specific dates, the resident's chin hairs were not trimmed, and the family had to intervene to maintain the resident's personal hygiene. Interviews with staff confirmed that shaving typically occurred on shower days, but Resident #10's chin hairs were neglected. Similarly, Resident #64, who had intact cognition but was dependent on staff for personal hygiene due to ataxia and dysphagia, was observed to have long chin hairs over several days. The resident expressed a desire to have her chin hairs shaved but felt that staff were not willing to provide the care. Despite being scheduled for showers, the resident's chin hairs remained unshaved, and staff interviews confirmed that shaving was not consistently performed. These observations and interviews indicate a failure by the facility to meet the personal hygiene needs of residents dependent on staff for ADL.
Failure to Timely Review and Address Resident Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team reviewed falls timely and developed and implemented interventions promptly. This deficiency affected a resident with dementia and hypertension, who was at moderate risk for falls. The resident experienced a fall on 03/16/24, resulting in a large bump on her forehead and subsequent bruising and swelling. Despite the fall, the facility did not review the incident or update the care plan with new interventions until 04/02/24, significantly delaying the response to the resident's fall risk. The resident was found on the floor with feces on her hands, clothing, and the floor, and was sent to the hospital for assessment. The hospital records indicated no fractures or intracranial abnormalities, but the resident had a contusion and hematoma on her forehead. Interviews with staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the fall intervention was not added to the care plan until 04/02/24, and there was no evidence of an investigation into the fall prior to that date. The facility's policies required immediate investigation and follow-up for falls, which were not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for two residents, leading to significant discomfort and potential health risks. Resident #56, who had a history of urinary tract infection (UTI) and muscle weakness, required substantial assistance for toileting and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Despite a physician's order to check and change the resident's brief every two hours, the care plan was not updated to reflect this intervention. On multiple occasions, Resident #56 was found saturated with urine and feces, indicating that the staff did not adhere to the two-hour check and change schedule. Interviews with staff revealed that they were unable to meet the required care frequency due to high resident-to-staff ratios and the demanding nature of their assignments, which included multiple residents requiring extensive assistance, such as Hoyer lifts or sit-to-stand transfers. Resident #56 expressed anxiety about the situation, fearing another UTI that could lead to severe complications like sepsis, which she had previously experienced. The staff confirmed that they were often unable to perform the necessary checks and changes every two hours due to workload constraints, further highlighting the facility's staffing issues and their impact on resident care. Resident #72, who was cognitively intact and required maximum assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) due to a right knee prosthesis and leg brace, also experienced delays in incontinence care. Despite having a care plan that included frequent checks for incontinence, Resident #72 was left in wet clothing for an extended period. The resident had activated the call light, but staff turned it off and informed him they would return later. Observations confirmed that the resident's room smelled of urine, and his shorts were visibly wet. Staff admitted that they had to prioritize other residents with higher acuity needs, further underscoring the facility's staffing challenges and their detrimental effect on resident care.
Failure to Use PPE and Improper Catheter Bag Placement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while in the room of a resident who was positive for extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance. Multiple staff members, including a Physical Therapy Assistant, a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant, and a State Tested Nursing Assistant, were observed entering and exiting the resident's room without wearing the required gown and gloves. Additionally, one staff member did not perform hand hygiene after exiting the room. The resident's care plan indicated the need for contact precautions, but staff did not adhere to these guidelines, and there was no physician's order for contact isolation at the time of the surveyor's observation. The facility also failed to ensure that a resident's catheter bag was not placed on the floor. During the survey, a resident's catheter bag was observed lying on the floor next to her bed, which was confirmed by both the resident and a Licensed Practical Nurse. The facility's policy on indwelling catheters states that residents should receive appropriate treatment to prevent urinary tract infections, but this policy was not followed in this instance. The resident's catheter bag was usually kept in a basin on the floor, but staff had placed it directly on the floor while preparing to transfer the resident using a mechanical lift.
Failure to Post and Maintain Nurse Staffing Data
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted on a daily basis and did not maintain historical staffing data, potentially affecting all 76 residents. On 04/01/24, it was observed that the posted daily staffing data was outdated, showing a date of 03/24/24. An interview on 04/02/24 with a medical records staff member confirmed that the most recently posted staffing data was from November 2023. Further, on 04/10/24, the same staff member stated she only had daily staffing data beginning 04/03/24 and could not produce any records prior to that date. She also mentioned that she did not know who was responsible for posting the data before her assignment on 04/03/24. The facility was unable to provide any historical daily staffing data reports.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 93 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Findlay
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birchaven Retirement Village | 0 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| The Manor At Greendale | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Heritage The | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Briar Hill Health Campus | 9.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Serenity Spring Senior Living At Arlington | 10.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Fox Run Manor.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.