Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Crestmont North Nursing Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Missed Quarterly Care Plan Meetings: The facility failed to hold and document quarterly care plan meetings for three residents. One resident with schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, alcohol dependence, and dementia had gaps in care conference documentation between admission and later meetings; another resident with dementia, DM2, anxiety, and GERD had only one care plan meeting nearly 15 months after admission; and a third resident with opioid dependence, COPD, PTSD, paraplegia, MDD, and substance-induced dementia, who had a legal guardian, had only one documented care conference six months after admission. The DON confirmed no additional documentation was available.
A resident with severely impaired cognition and diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, alcohol dependence, and dementia was allowed to sign financial documents despite prior guardianship history. Financial records showed the resident signed an authorization to manage funds and later refused to sign trust account statements, and the DON confirmed the facility permitted the resident to sign her own financial documents.
Misappropriation of controlled medications occurred when an LPN was found to have removed oxycodone and lorazepam tablets from medication cards and replaced some with loratadine tablets taped over the back. Three residents were affected, including residents with cognitive impairment and residents with anxiety-related diagnoses. The DON reported that the LPN said she gave discontinued oxycodone by accident and did not report the error.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, COPD, and anxiety did not have skin assessments completed as ordered. The physician ordered weekly skin checks on shower days with documentation on Tuesday and Friday day shifts, but the record showed only one skin assessment and no further documentation for the remainder of the stay. The DON confirmed the missing assessments, and the facility policy required weekly skin checks by the LPN/RN to be documented in the EMR.
Medication administration errors occurred when an LPN gave a resident aspirin EC 81 mg instead of the ordered chewable aspirin 81 mg and omitted ordered cholecalciferol and thiamine. The resident had COPD, mild cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorder, and was assessed as cognitively intact. The errors resulted in a 10.34% medication error rate, exceeding the 5% threshold.
Several residents with facility-managed accounts had personal fund balances that exceeded the SSI resource limit, and routine, timely notices were not consistently provided or acted upon. Some residents received spend-down notices but did not reduce their balances, and in one instance, a notice was given to a resident instead of their legal guardian. The Administrator confirmed the issue was related to the county office not deducting required liabilities.
The facility did not ensure that advance directives were accurately documented, signed, and consistently reflected in the medical records for three residents, including those with complex medical conditions such as schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In several cases, care plans did not address advance directives, forms were left unsigned by physicians, and discrepancies existed between electronic and hard copy records, leading to staff uncertainty about appropriate actions during emergencies.
The facility did not accurately complete or update care plans for two residents, omitting a fall intervention for one cognitively intact resident with a history of falls and failing to document ongoing behavioral symptoms for another resident with anxiety and confusion. The DON confirmed that these omissions were not in accordance with facility policy, which requires care plans to be revised as resident conditions change.
A resident with multiple diagnoses and a history of falls was not thoroughly assessed following two separate falls. The facility's investigations did not document whether required fall prevention interventions, such as non-skid socks or a perimeter mattress, were in place at the time of the incidents. The care plan and fall risk assessment were also not consistently updated to reflect the resident's needs and implemented interventions, as confirmed by the DON.
Two residents receiving oxygen therapy did not have care consistent with physician orders or facility policy. One resident with a tracheostomy was observed with an oxygen setting higher than ordered, and the RN was unaware of the correct order. Another resident using oxygen as needed did not have the required 'oxygen in use' signage on the door, as confirmed by an LPN. Facility policy requires verification of orders and appropriate signage for all residents using oxygen.
The facility did not conduct trauma-informed assessments or develop individualized care plans for several residents with PTSD, resulting in a lack of documentation regarding trauma causes, triggers, and interventions to prevent re-traumatization. Staff were not trained in trauma-informed care, and care plans did not address specific needs related to PTSD, despite facility policy requiring such measures.
A resident with a PEG tube and multiple diagnoses was given several crushed medications mixed together and administered at once by an RN, despite no physician order to do so. The facility's policy required each medication to be given separately through the enteral tube, but this was not followed, resulting in a significant medication error.
Staff failed to consistently use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for two residents with indwelling medical devices during high contact care activities. In both cases, staff wore gloves but not gowns, and one staff member placed contaminated washcloths on an unclean surface and used the same cloth for multiple tasks, resulting in cross-contamination. Required EBP signage was also missing for one resident, and staff were unclear about EBP requirements for catheter care.
The facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for several residents, leading to incomplete documentation of care needs such as incontinence and UTIs. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and understanding of care planning requirements, resulting in non-compliance with facility policies.
The facility failed to update care plans with new fall interventions for three residents. A resident with cerebral infarction and dementia fell, but their care plan was not updated with non-skid socks. Another resident with hemiplegia fell, and their care plan lacked call light education. A third resident with diabetes fell, and their care plan did not include toileting assistance. The DON confirmed these omissions, indicating non-compliance with care plan policies.
The facility failed to conduct timely fall risk assessments for residents, leading to inadequate fall prevention interventions. A resident with cerebral infarction and dementia was not assessed for fall risk for over three years. Another resident with major depressive disorder did not receive a fall risk assessment upon admission. A third resident with chronic kidney disease experienced a similar gap in assessments. Interviews with the DON and ADON confirmed the assessments were not completed as required.
The facility failed to administer medications as per physician orders for two residents. One resident missed doses of Macrobid for a UTI, while another missed doses of Levofloxacin due to incorrect order entry. The DON confirmed the omissions and was unaware of the reasons, despite the availability of antibiotics in the facility.
Missed Quarterly Care Plan Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident care plan meetings were held quarterly for three residents reviewed for care plan meetings. For Resident #66, who was admitted with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, anxiety disorder, alcohol dependence, and dementia with mood disorder, the record showed severely impaired cognition, no behaviors, and total staff assistance needed for bed mobility and transfers. Care conference documentation showed meetings on 07/17/25, 01/23/26, 02/03/26, and 03/10/26, but there were no documented care conferences from admission until 07/17/25 or between 07/17/25 and 01/23/26. Resident #23 was admitted on 01/22/25 with diagnoses including dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and GERD, and the only care plan meeting available was 05/07/26, nearly 15 months after admission. Resident #48 was admitted on 12/12/25 with diagnoses including opioid dependence, nicotine dependence, cannabis abuse, GERD, COPD, PTSD, paraplegia, major depressive disorder, and psychoactive substance abuse with psychoactive substance-induced dementia; this resident had a legal guardian and the only care conference available was dated 06/04/26, six months after admission. The Quarterly MDS showed Resident #23 had severely impaired cognition and Resident #48 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 06/09/26 at 2:40 P.M., the DON confirmed that no additional care conference documentation was available for any of these residents.
Resident with Severe Cognitive Impairment Allowed to Sign Financial Documents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with severely impaired cognition was not permitted to sign financial documents. Resident #66 was admitted with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, anxiety disorder, alcohol dependence, and dementia with mood disturbance, and the admission MDS showed severely impaired cognition. Guardianship records showed the resident previously had a temporary guardian, and financial records showed the resident signed an Authorization to Manage Resident Funds and later refused to sign trust account statements. The Administrator stated that the resident's niece initially volunteered for guardianship, the resident's daughter objected, and the facility assisted the daughter in obtaining guardianship, although the daughter had not been involved in the resident's care at either the prior or current facility before that time. The guardianship order later appointed the daughter as guardian, and the Administrator confirmed the facility allowed the resident to sign her own financial documents despite the severely impaired cognition.
Misappropriation of Controlled Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident narcotic and anti-anxiety medications were not misappropriated. During review of a self-reported incident, facility timeline, medical records, and staff interviews, surveyors found that controlled medications for three residents were missing or altered in Medication Cart A. The incident involved one resident with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, and dementia; another resident with anxiety disorder, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and a third resident with hypotension, anxiety disorder, and transient cerebral ischemic attack. On 05/10/26, an LPN discovered that two oxycodone tablets had been removed from one resident’s oxycodone medication card and replaced with loratadine tablets taped over the back. The same LPN also found that two lorazepam tablets belonging to another resident had been replaced with loratadine tablets and taped over the back. After auditing the remaining controlled medication drawers, the LPN found that a third resident’s lorazepam tablet was missing from the medication card, with the slot empty and not substituted like the other two cards. The facility investigation timeline and staff interview identified that an LPN had worked the overnight shift, counted Medication Cart A with another LPN, and later was observed placing tape on the back of a resident’s medication card. The DON stated that the LPN reported giving the resident two oxycodone tablets that had previously been discontinued by accident and believed they were the resident’s current Ativan medication, and that the error was not reported because the LPN was scared. The report states this deficiency was investigated as a complaint and was later corrected prior to the survey.
Failure to Complete Ordered Weekly Skin Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #66's skin was assessed according to the physician's orders. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, COPD, and generalized anxiety, and the Annual MDS indicated severe cognitive impairment. A physician order dated 01/14/25 directed weekly skin assessments on shower days and documentation under assessments every day shift on Tuesday and Friday. Review of the record showed only one Weekly Skin Data Collection on 01/09/26 documenting no new skin issues and a completed head-to-toe skin observation, with no further skin assessments documented from 01/01/26 through 03/25/26. The medical record, skin assessments, and progress notes did not show evidence of additional skin assessments during that period, and the DON confirmed the absence of such documentation during interview on 06/09/26. The facility's Wound Prevention policy stated weekly skin checks would be completed by the licensed nurse and documented in the EMR.
Medication Administration Errors Exceeded Allowed Rate
Penalty
Summary
Medication administration errors occurred for one resident when ordered medications were not given as prescribed. Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mild cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorder. The resident’s active physician orders included aspirin 81 mg chewable tablet once daily, thiamine 50 mg three times daily, and cholecalciferol 25 mcg, two tablets once daily. The resident’s Quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment indicated intact cognition. During observation, an LPN administered 10 medications to Resident #4 and three medication errors were identified. The LPN gave aspirin enteric-coated 81 mg instead of the ordered aspirin 81 mg chewable, and did not administer the ordered cholecalciferol 25 mcg (two tablets) or thiamine 50 mg. The LPN later confirmed these findings during interview. Based on 29 medication opportunities, the facility had 3 medication errors, resulting in a 10.34% medication error rate. The facility’s medication administration policy stated medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed.
Failure to Provide Timely Notices for Resident Fund Balances Exceeding SSI Limit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide routine and timely notices to residents when their personal fund balances exceeded the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit. Record review and interviews revealed that four residents had authorized the facility to manage their funds, but their account balances surpassed the allowable SSI limit. Despite receiving spend-down notices, the residents' funds continued to exceed the limit, and in one case, the notice was given to the resident instead of the legal guardian. Residents reported receiving notifications but did not take action to reduce their balances, and one resident was unsure of what was needed to spend down the funds. The Administrator confirmed that the affected residents' funds were over the SSI resource limit and attributed the issue to the county office not deducting the required liability from the residents' accounts. As a result, the facility did not ensure that residents or their representatives were properly notified or assisted in maintaining their funds below the SSI threshold, as required.
Failure to Ensure Accurate and Consistent Advance Directive Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents' advance directives were accurately documented, signed, and consistently reflected throughout their medical records. For one resident with schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and severe morbid obesity, the advance directive indicated Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care - Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest), but the comprehensive care plan did not address this directive. Additionally, the DNR Identification Form was not signed or dated by a physician, and staff confirmed that without a physician's signature, CPR would be performed if the resident was unresponsive. The facility's policy required that advance directives be respected and displayed prominently, but did not address ensuring consistency between the electronic medical record and the DNRCC form. Similar deficiencies were found for two other residents. One resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and paraplegia had conflicting advance directive information between the electronic and hard medical records, with staff and the DON confirming the inconsistency. Another resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and schizoaffective disorder had a care plan indicating DNRCC status, but the DNRCC form in the hard medical record was blank and not signed by a physician. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about what actions to take in an emergency due to the lack of clear, signed documentation. These findings affected three residents reviewed for advance directives.
Failure to Accurately Complete and Update Care Plans for Falls and Behavioral Symptoms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were completed accurately and updated to reflect current interventions and behaviors for two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including viral hepatitis, anxiety, and arthritis, a fall investigation revealed that the resident had rolled off the bed and fallen. Although a mattress was placed beside the bed as a fall intervention, this measure was not documented in the resident's care plan. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the intervention was not included in the care plan and stated that both the mattress and 15-minute checks were considered temporary and were no longer in place, with the mattress never having been listed as an intervention. For another resident with anxiety and viral hepatitis, who exhibited behavioral symptoms such as confusion, forgetfulness, and difficulty remembering, the care plan addressed some behavioral interventions but did not include information about the resident's ongoing behaviors of accusing staff of false accusations and not listening, which had been occurring for at least a year and had increased in frequency. The Director of Nursing confirmed that these behaviors were not documented in the care plan. Facility policy required care plans to be revised as the resident's condition changed and to identify problem areas and risk factors, but this was not followed in these cases.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate and Document Fall Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls for a resident with a history of viral hepatitis, anxiety, and arthritis, who was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance for toileting. The resident was identified as being at risk for falls due to muscle weakness and difficulty walking, with interventions such as keeping pathways clear, ensuring the call bell was within reach, using a perimeter mattress, and requiring non-skid socks or shoes. However, after two falls on the same day, the facility's investigations did not document whether these interventions were in place at the time of the incidents. Specifically, the investigations did not confirm if the resident was wearing non-skid socks or shoes during either fall, nor did they verify if a perimeter mattress was present during the second fall. Additionally, the care plan was not updated to reflect all interventions implemented after the falls, such as the addition of a mattress next to the bed. The fall risk assessment did not identify the resident as being at risk for falls, despite the care plan indicating otherwise. The facility's policy required monitoring and documentation of residents' responses to fall interventions, but the investigations lacked evidence that these procedures were followed. Interviews with the DON confirmed these omissions in the fall investigations and care plan documentation.
Failure to Administer Oxygen per Physician Orders and Lack of Required Oxygen Signage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that oxygen was administered according to physician orders and that appropriate signage was present for residents using oxygen. For one resident with a history of malignant neoplasm of the oropharynx and hypotension, who had a tracheostomy and required oxygen, the physician order specified oxygen at 35 percent with a two-liter bleed per trach collar. However, observation revealed the oxygen was set at seven liters, and the trach collar mask was not in use until reapplied by an RN, who was unaware of the correct order and did not adjust the oxygen setting. The RN later confirmed she had not checked the physician order and did not realize the oxygen was set incorrectly. The DON also verified the correct order was for two liters, not seven. Additionally, another resident with COPD had a physician order for two liters of oxygen as needed, with instructions to change tubing and nasal cannula weekly. Observation found an oxygen tank and tubing in the resident's room, but there was no sign on the door indicating oxygen was in use, as required by facility policy. An LPN confirmed the resident used oxygen as needed and that the appropriate signage was missing. The facility policy stated that a "no smoking or oxygen in use" sign should be in place for any resident using oxygen.
Failure to Provide Trauma-Informed Care and Individualized PTSD Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop individualized care plans for residents diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). For multiple residents with PTSD, including those with both cognitive impairment and those who were cognitively intact, the facility did not document the causes, triggers, or ongoing effects of PTSD in their medical records. Care plans lacked specific interventions to minimize triggers or prevent re-traumatization, and there was no evidence of trauma-informed assessments being conducted. Staff interviews confirmed a lack of knowledge regarding residents' PTSD triggers and the absence of trauma-informed care planning. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the facility relied on outside counseling services for PTSD management and did not have a process in place to obtain or integrate trauma-related information into care plans. Additionally, the facility's policy required staff training on trauma-informed care and the use of trauma screening and assessment tools, but interviews revealed that such training had not been provided. The policy also mandated the development of individualized care plans to address and decrease exposure to triggers, which was not reflected in the reviewed care plans. The deficiency affected at least three residents reviewed for PTSD, with a total of seven residents identified as having PTSD in the facility.
Significant Medication Error Due to Improper Administration via PEG Tube
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the oropharynx, rheumatoid arthritis, hypotension, and convulsions, and who had a PEG tube and impaired cognition, was observed during medication administration. The resident's care plan included interventions for aspiration risk and PEG tube care, but did not address the method of medication administration, specifically the practice of crushing and mixing medications together. Physician orders specified that Primidone, Hydroxychloroquine sulfate, and Midodrine were to be administered via PEG tube, but there was no order to crush and mix these medications together (cocktailing). During observation, an RN prepared the resident's medications by crushing all three tablets together, mixing them with water, and administering the combined mixture through the PEG tube, followed by a water flush. The RN confirmed there was no order to mix the medications together and was unaware if the physician had reviewed potential side effects or interactions from administering the medications in this manner. The DON also verified that there was no order to mix the medications and that facility policy required each medication to be administered separately through the enteral tube. This failure to follow physician orders and facility policy resulted in a significant medication error for the resident.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Proper Infection Control During High Contact Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents with indwelling medical devices during high contact care activities, as observed with two residents. One resident with a tracheostomy and PEG tube had clear signage indicating EBP requirements, including the use of gloves and gowns for specific care activities. However, a registered nurse was observed entering the resident's room on two occasions to perform high contact care activities, such as administering medications through the PEG tube and providing tracheostomy care, while only wearing gloves and not a gown. The nurse's uniform came into direct contact with the resident during these activities, and both the nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that a gown should have been worn for these procedures. Another resident with a suprapubic catheter and chronic wounds was also not provided with proper EBP. There was no signage on the resident's door indicating EBP status, and a certified nursing assistant performed catheter care and emptied the drainage bag while only wearing gloves, not a gown. The assistant placed clean and used washcloths on a nightstand that had visible brown dried substances, and used the same washcloth to clean both the suprapubic catheter site and the drainage bag port, resulting in cross-contamination. The assistant was unaware that the resident was on EBP and that a gown was required for high contact care activities, and acknowledged the potential for cross-contamination during the interview. The Infection Control Coordinator initially expressed uncertainty about the need for EBP for residents with suprapubic catheters, but later confirmed that EBP should be used for all high contact care activities for such residents. Facility policies reviewed did not specify the need to ensure bedside stands were clean before placing equipment, and the policy for emptying urinary drainage bags required wiping the port with an alcohol swab, which was not followed. CDC guidance and facility policy both require EBP for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices, including the use of gloves and gowns for high contact care activities, and posting appropriate signage, which was not consistently implemented.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were initiated for all resident care needs, affecting four residents. Resident #48, diagnosed with conditions including cerebral infarction and vascular dementia, was found to have a urinary tract infection (UTI) but lacked a comprehensive care plan addressing urinary incontinence or the UTI. Similarly, Resident #25, with diagnoses such as hemiplegia and depression, was occasionally incontinent of bladder, yet no care plan for incontinence was in place. Resident #7, with a history of cerebral infarction and diabetes, was also occasionally incontinent, but their care plan did not address this issue. Resident #11, diagnosed with chronic kidney disease and schizoaffective disorder, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel, but their care plan lacked documentation for incontinence. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS Nurse, DON, and ADON, revealed a lack of awareness and understanding regarding the necessity of care planning for incontinence and other resident needs. The MDS Nurse admitted to not knowing the requirement for incontinence care planning, while the DON and ADON confirmed that care plans were not completed correctly and interventions were not updated. The facility's policies on charting and documentation, as well as comprehensive person-centered care plans, were not adhered to, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate documentation in the medical records.
Failure to Revise Care Plans with New Fall Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were revised to reflect new fall interventions for three residents. Resident #48, who was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and vascular dementia, experienced a fall on 10/31/24. The care plan, dated 09/11/20, was not updated to include the intervention of non-skid socks to prevent further falls. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the care plans were not correctly updated. Similarly, Resident #25, admitted with conditions such as hemiplegia and anxiety disorder, fell on 08/06/24. The care plan, dated 07/31/23, was not revised to include the intervention of educating the resident on the use of the call light. Additionally, Resident #7, with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and diabetes, fell on 08/10/24. The care plan from 08/26/19 did not reflect the new intervention of offering assistance with toileting. The DON confirmed that these care plans were not revised to include the necessary fall interventions, indicating non-compliance with the facility's policy on comprehensive, person-centered care plans.
Failure to Conduct Timely Fall Risk Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely fall risk assessments for residents, which led to inadequate fall prevention interventions. Resident #48, who had a history of cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and difficulty walking, was not assessed for fall risk between March 2021 and October 2024, despite having multiple diagnoses that increased the risk of falls. Similarly, Resident #21, diagnosed with major depressive disorder and chronic viral hepatitis C, did not have a fall risk assessment upon admission, which is crucial for implementing appropriate fall prevention measures. Resident #11, with chronic kidney disease and schizoaffective disorder, also experienced a significant gap in fall risk assessments, with no assessments conducted between March 2021 and November 2024. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that fall risk assessments were not completed as required. The facility's policies on fall risk assessment and management, revised in December 2007, were not adhered to, contributing to the deficiency identified in the complaint investigation.
Medication Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were administered to residents according to physician orders, affecting two residents. Resident #7, who had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia, diabetes, major depressive disorder, and seizures, was prescribed Macrobid for a urinary tract infection. The medication administration records showed that Resident #7 missed the evening dose on the first day of the prescription and had incomplete records for subsequent days, although paper records indicated the medication was administered as ordered. The Director of Nursing confirmed the missed dose and was unaware of the reason for the omission, despite the availability of a starter box containing the antibiotic. Resident #48, with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and hypertension, was prescribed Levofloxacin for a urinary tract infection. The medication administration records revealed that Resident #48 missed doses on two separate days, with one day marked as absent from home. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the order was entered incorrectly, resulting in missed doses, and was unable to explain why the medication was not administered, despite the presence of a starter box with the antibiotic. The facility's policies on medication utilization and antibiotic stewardship were reviewed, indicating that medications should be administered appropriately.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 989 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lakewood
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enniscourt Nursing Care | 0 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 1 |
| O'neill Healthcare Lakewood | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Rocky River Gardens Rehab And Nursing Ctr | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Larchwood Care | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Franklin Plaza Extended Care | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 39 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Crestmont North Nursing Home.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.