Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Covenant Village Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple medical conditions, moderately impaired cognition, and a court-appointed guardian was discharged home without guardian approval and with HHC arranged only on the day of discharge. Documentation showed the resident required assistance with ADLs and had functional decision-making impairments, yet social services recorded that the resident insisted on going home, refused LTC placement, and arranged transportation with a family member. Discharge notes indicated instructions and medications were provided, but interviews confirmed that the guardian did not authorize the discharge and that the timing of the HHC referral did not follow the facility’s usual practice, resulting in a failure to ensure a safe and orderly discharge as required by facility policy.
A resident admitted with multiple medical conditions, including a displaced humerus fracture and rheumatic mitral stenosis, had hospital discharge orders and facility orders for PRN Oxycodone for pain but went 36 hours without receiving it. The baseline care plan completed within 48 hours of admission did not assess or address the resident’s pain or documented hearing loss with use of hearing aids, despite the resident being cognitively intact and reporting excruciating pain and hearing impairment. An MDS coordinator later confirmed that pain management and hearing loss should have been included in the baseline care plan, contrary to facility policy requiring essential healthcare information in baseline care plans.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to assess and care plan activity needs for two residents whose CAAs triggered activities as a care area. Both residents had severe cognitive impairment and required significant assistance with ADLs, and activity assessments had been completed, but their care plans contained no activity-related goals or interventions. The Activities Director acknowledged there were no ongoing documented activity preferences or assessments for these residents, and the DON confirmed that activities were not included in their care plans and that no quarterly activity assessments had been done, despite facility policies requiring comprehensive, person-centered care plans and routine activity evaluations.
A resident with multiple medical conditions, including a displaced fracture of the upper left humerus, was admitted with hospital orders for PRN oxycodone for pain. Facility physician orders continued PRN oxycodone for fracture-related pain, but due to the prescription being sent to a specialty pharmacy without a required signature, the medication was not available for approximately 36 hours. During this time, the resident reported excruciating pain, and the MAR showed the first oxycodone dose was not given until two days after the facility order, with a documented pain level of nine. This failure to ensure timely availability of ordered PRN pain medication resulted in a deficiency related to pain management.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple neurologic and medical diagnoses, including Huntington's disease, ataxia, corticobasal degeneration, and dysphagia, was found living in a room where the floor was covered with small white spots resembling paint chips and the walls around the bed had multiple areas of worn paint and black scuff marks. During an observation with the Maintenance Director and Administrator, both confirmed the walls and floor should have been repaired before reaching this condition. Review of the facility's Environmental Services Inspection policy showed it required regular monitoring, random or routine inspections, and immediate correction of issues to maintain a safe and sanitary environment, which was not followed in this instance.
A resident requiring maximum assistance and using a wheelchair was sent to an oral surgery appointment without an escort, dressed only in hospital gowns and socks during cold weather, and left unattended in a medical center lobby. Facility staff were unaware of the appointment, and available donated clothing was not used.
A resident at risk for pressure ulcers developed a stage III ulcer due to inadequate skin assessments and monitoring. Despite interventions in place, the facility failed to identify the ulcer until it reached an advanced stage, as confirmed by a WNP. The deficiency was investigated under a complaint, revealing non-compliance with pressure ulcer prevention standards.
Failure to Ensure Safe Discharge for Resident Under Guardianship
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a safe discharge for a resident who had a court-appointed guardian and documented cognitive impairment. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, depression, mental disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and essential hypertension, had a recent MDS showing moderately impaired cognition (BIMS score of eight) and needed assistance with eating, toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. A Letter of Guardianship documented that the resident was incompetent for an indefinite period. The discharge summary stated the resident was discharged home with functional impairments in decision-making, that the son would provide transportation, and that discharge paperwork was reviewed with the patient. Social service notes on the day of discharge documented that the resident’s daughter had been called regarding a lost appeal, that the resident was to discharge home with HHC and transportation by his son, and later that the resident was discharged home with his brother, with discharge instructions reviewed and paperwork signed. Further review and interviews revealed that the HHC referral for the resident was not sent until the day of discharge, whereas the social service assistant stated such referrals usually occur prior to the day of discharge. The HHC notification showed HHC was planned and accepted on the same day as discharge. The social service assistant and the Administrator confirmed that the resident’s guardian did not give approval for the resident to discharge home and that the resident arranged his own transportation, stating he would call his brother. A subsequent social service note documented that the resident was adamant about returning home and refusing LTC placement or transfer, and that, based on discussion with the resident, there was no evidence he was incompetent to make his own decisions, and that he verbalized the risks of living alone. The facility’s Transfer and Discharge policy required orientation and documentation to ensure a safe and orderly transfer or discharge in a form and manner the resident could understand. The survey found the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for this resident, who was under guardianship and discharged home without guardian approval, with HHC arranged only on the day of discharge.
Failure to Include Pain Management and Hearing Loss in Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a complete baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that addressed pain management and hearing loss for one resident. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including discoid lupus erythematosus, depression, polyarthritis, cardiac arrhythmia, cervical disc disorder, a displaced fracture of the upper end of the left humerus, and rheumatic mitral stenosis. The resident’s MDS 3.0 assessment in progress indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the baseline care plan showed that pain and hearing loss, including the use of a hearing aid, were not assessed or incorporated into the plan, despite the resident’s conditions and needs. Record review showed a hospital discharge order for Oxycodone immediate release 5 mg every four hours as needed, and a facility physician order for Oxycodone 5 mg every six hours as needed for pain related to the left humerus fracture. The resident reported experiencing excruciating pain and stated that the facility was unable to provide the Oxycodone for 36 hours. The resident also reported having hearing loss and wearing hearing aids. The MDS coordinator confirmed that the baseline care plan did not include pain or hearing loss and acknowledged that these should have been included. Facility policy on care planning required that the baseline care plan include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident.
Failure to Assess and Care Plan Residents’ Activity Needs
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to develop and implement complete, person-centered care plans that addressed residents’ activity needs with measurable goals and interventions. For one resident with diagnoses including dizziness, chronic embolism and thrombosis of an unspecified vein, dysphagia, Alzheimer’s disease, and anxiety disorder, the most recent MDS showed severe cognitive impairment and total dependence for eating, bathing, and personal hygiene. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) for this resident triggered activities as a care area requiring care planning, and an activity assessment had been completed; however, the resident’s care plan contained no goals or interventions related to activities. A second resident, with diagnoses including Huntington’s disease, essential hypertension, ataxia, corticobasal degeneration, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia, also had an MDS indicating severe cognitive impairment and the need for partial or substantial assistance with eating, toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. The CAA for this resident likewise triggered activities for care planning, and an activity assessment had been completed, but the care plan did not include any activity-related goals or interventions. The Activities Director reported there were no documented ongoing activity preferences or assessments for these two residents, and the DON confirmed that activities were not included in their care plans and that no quarterly activity assessments had been completed, contrary to the facility’s written Care Plan and Activities policies. This deficiency was investigated under Complaint Number 2700708.
Failure to Ensure Availability of Ordered PRN Pain Medication
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure ordered pain medication was available for a resident who required pain management. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including discoid lupus erythematosus, depression, polyarthritis, cardiac arrhythmia, cervical disc disorder, a displaced fracture of the upper end of the left humerus, and rheumatic mitral stenosis. Hospital discharge orders dated 03/19/26 included Oxycodone immediate release 5 mg every four hours as needed. Facility physician orders dated 03/27/26 at 2:45 P.M. specified Oxycodone 5 mg orally every six hours as needed for pain related to the displaced fracture of the left humerus. Review of the MAR showed that Oxycodone was first administered on 03/29/26 at 8:55 A.M., at which time the resident’s pain level was documented as nine. The resident reported during interview that upon admission she experienced excruciating pain and was unable to receive Oxycodone, stating the facility could not provide it for 36 hours. The DON confirmed that the resident arrived with an Oxycodone order from the hospital and that the prescription was sent to the specialty pharmacy without a signature, resulting in the ordered Oxycodone not being available from 03/27/26 to 03/29/26. During this period, the resident did not have access to the prescribed pain medication. The facility’s pain assessment and management policy, dated 08/2025, directed staff to review the MAR to determine how often an individual requests and receives PRN pain medication and the extent to which administered medications relieve the resident’s pain. This deficiency was investigated under Complaint Numbers 2788877 and 2722512.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary Resident Room Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment in a resident room, resulting in noncompliance with requirements to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable area for residents, staff, and the public. The affected resident had diagnoses including Huntington's disease, essential hypertension, ataxia, corticobasal degeneration, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia. The most recent MDS 3.0 assessment documented severe cognitive impairment and a need for partial assistance with eating and personal hygiene, and substantial assistance with toileting and bathing. These clinical details establish that the resident was dependent on staff and the facility environment for safe and sanitary living conditions. During an observation and interview in the resident’s room with the Maintenance Director and the Administrator, surveyors noted the floor was covered with small white spots that appeared to be paint chips stuck to the floor. They also observed multiple areas of worn paint and scuffing on the walls: paint worn off about six inches by twelve inches near the footboard, paint worn with black scuff marks about twelve inches by eighteen inches near the top bed rail, and paint worn off about one inch by eight inches near the headboard. The Maintenance Director confirmed that the walls and floor should have been repaired before reaching this condition. Review of the facility’s “Environmental Services Inspection” policy, dated 12/2025, showed that the facility was supposed to regularly monitor environmental services, perform random and/or routine inspections, and correct all identified opportunities immediately, which did not occur in this case.
Resident Sent to Appointment Unattended and Inappropriately Dressed
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with a zygomatic fracture and depression, who required maximum assistance with toileting and dressing and used a wheelchair, was sent to an oral surgery appointment without appropriate clothing or an escort. The resident was dropped off by a transport company and left unattended in the medical center lobby, dressed only in two hospital gowns and socks during cold winter weather, with no paperwork or clear understanding of the appointment. Staff at the oral surgery office found the resident unaccompanied and unsure of her purpose for being there. Facility staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness regarding the resident's appointment, and the nursing supervisor was not informed until contacted by the oral surgery office. The resident was sent out without an escort, and staff confirmed she did not have her own clothing. Although the facility maintained a supply of donated clothing for residents without personal clothes, this resource was not utilized. The weather on the day of the appointment was notably cold, with temperatures ranging from 18 to 25 degrees Fahrenheit.
Failure to Prevent and Timely Identify Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately assess and monitor the skin condition of Resident #104, who was admitted without pressure ulcers but was at risk for developing them. Despite being identified as at risk for impaired skin integrity due to fragile skin and incontinence, the resident's care plan included interventions such as applying a moisture barrier, using a pressure-reducing mattress, and conducting regular skin checks. However, daily nurse assessments from 10/24/24 to 11/04/24 did not document any skin impairments, and the resident's Braden Scale assessment on 10/31/24 indicated a low risk for pressure ulcers. On 11/04/24, a CNA informed LPN #69 of two new open wounds on the resident's buttocks, which were subsequently assessed and treated by the nurse. The wounds were not identified until they had progressed to a stage III pressure ulcer, as confirmed by WNP #175 on 11/05/24. The pressure ulcer on the resident's left gluteus measured 7 cm by 4 cm by 0.3 cm, with exposed subcutaneous tissue and eschar present. The facility's policy required weekly skin assessments and more frequent checks if indicated, but these were not effectively implemented, leading to the late identification of the pressure ulcer. Interviews with the DON and LPN #68 confirmed that the pressure ulcer was facility-acquired and not identified until it reached an advanced stage. The facility's failure to conduct thorough and timely skin assessments, as outlined in their policy and NPIAP guidelines, contributed to the development and progression of the pressure ulcer. The deficiency was investigated under Complaint Number OH00159654, highlighting non-compliance with pressure ulcer prevention and care standards.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 817 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 12 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cincinnati
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrace View Gardens | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Mt Airy Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Bridgetown Nursing And Rehabilitation Centre | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 33 | 0 |
| Hillebrand Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Lakeridge Villa Health Care Center | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Covenant Village Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.