Country Club Retirement Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Mount Vernon, Ohio.
- Location
- 1350 Yauger Road, Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
- CMS Provider Number
- 365815
- Inspections on file
- 24
- Latest survey
- June 10, 2025
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 0
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Country Club Retirement Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively impaired resident with a history of elopement risk was able to remove a Wanderguard safety device and leave the facility without staff knowledge. The resident was later found at a family member's home after walking through the community, and the incident was only discovered during a routine check. The facility failed to maintain a safe environment and provide adequate supervision, allowing the resident to elope undetected.
A resident identified as a high fall risk experienced multiple falls without effective individualized interventions being implemented. Despite having a care plan with interventions like a personal alarm and room relocation, the facility failed to consistently review and update these measures following each fall. This oversight led to a significant incident where the resident sustained fractures, highlighting deficiencies in the facility's fall prevention program.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and incontinence was physically abused by an STNA during care. The STNA slapped the resident's hand after the resident grabbed her, which was witnessed by another staff member. The resident's care plan included interventions for resistive behavior due to dementia. The facility's policy prohibits abuse, and the STNA's actions were inconsistent with these standards.
A resident's narcotic medication was misappropriated in an LTC facility. The resident, who required assistance with medication administration, had a prescription for Percocet. Eight tablets were found missing during a narcotic count, and an LPN was identified as a suspect but denied involvement. The facility's investigation revealed discrepancies in the narcotic count sheet and medication card, leading to the conclusion of misappropriation.
The facility failed to ensure that food was served at a palatable and warm temperature, affecting all residents who received meals from the kitchen. Observations revealed that trays were being passed out of an open-air cart, leading to significant temperature drops in the food items. The facility did not have a tray delivery policy, contributing to the deficiency.
The facility failed to provide scheduled bathing for five residents who were dependent on staff for their ADLs. Residents with cognitive impairments and physical dependencies did not receive showers or bed baths as scheduled, despite their preferences and needs. Corporate Nurse #100 and the DON confirmed the discrepancies in the bathing schedules.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for six residents with indwelling medical devices due to supply shortages and delays. Despite completing education on these precautions in April 2024, the necessary measures were not in place during an observation period, affecting infection control efforts.
The facility failed to maintain the correct advance directives in a resident's medical record. Despite a change in code status to DNRCC-Arrest, the medical record at the nurse's station showed no evidence of advance directives. An LPN confirmed the absence of these directives, although the electronic record indicated the correct status. This issue affected one resident and had the potential to impact all 60 residents.
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by an STNA and another resident from verbal abuse by an STNA. The incidents were not thoroughly documented or reported to the state agency as required, affecting the safety and well-being of all 60 residents.
The facility failed to report an allegation of staff-to-resident verbal abuse to the state agency as required. A resident reported that an STNA threatened to break her other leg and yelled at her in front of a family member. Despite multiple staff members being aware of the incident, it was not reported, and no documentation of an investigation was found.
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate abuse allegations for two residents, involving incidents of physical and verbal abuse by STNAs. The investigations were incomplete, lacked proper documentation, and were not reported to the state agency as required.
The facility failed to follow its bowel policy for two residents, leading to prolonged periods without bowel movements and lack of appropriate medical intervention. Additionally, the facility did not have the required Hospice communication records onsite for a resident receiving Hospice services, violating the facility and Hospice agreement.
A resident with multiple medical conditions developed stage III and stage II pressure ulcers on the buttocks due to the facility's failure to comprehensively assess and provide adequate interventions and treatment. The resident's declining condition and refusal of care were not addressed, and there were no documented weekly skin assessments or new interventions after the pressure ulcers were discovered.
A resident with dementia and other health issues was not offered additional food or nutritional shakes when consuming less than 50% of meals, despite a care plan requiring it. Interviews confirmed the deficiency.
The facility failed to ensure that dialysis communication forms were completed and returned post dialysis treatment for a resident with acute kidney failure and dependence on renal dialysis. The resident's plan of care required monitoring and communication regarding dialysis treatments, but forms for several dates were not completed by the dialysis center. This issue was confirmed by a nurse, who acknowledged difficulties in obtaining completed forms from the dialysis company.
The facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for two residents. One resident's PRN order for Hydroxyzine lacked a stop date, and another resident's Seroquel dose reduction was delayed by 30 days. These deficiencies were confirmed through medical record reviews and staff interviews.
Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Wanderguard Removal
Penalty
Summary
A cognitively impaired resident with a history of Wernicke's encephalopathy, chronic alcohol use disorder, seizure disorder, urinary tract infection, and hypertension was admitted to the facility and identified as being at risk for elopement. The resident was assessed as mildly cognitively impaired and was independent with activities of daily living, but required cueing and assistance at times. The care plan included the use of a Wanderguard safety bracelet to prevent unsupervised exit from the facility. Despite these interventions, the resident was able to remove the Wanderguard without staff knowledge. Staff discovered the device was missing and conducted a search of the resident's room and belongings, but could not determine how the device was removed. Subsequently, the resident was found to be missing during a routine check, prompting an elopement drill, notification of the DON, and involvement of local police. The resident's guardian later reported that the resident had arrived at her home, approximately two miles from the facility, after leaving the premises without staff awareness. Interviews with the resident and family confirmed that the resident had intentionally left the facility after removing the Wanderguard, walked through the community, and arrived at his guardian's home. The guardian was not concerned about the incident and did not notify the facility upon the resident's arrival. The facility's failure to maintain a safe environment and provide adequate supervision allowed the resident to elope undetected, despite being identified as at risk for such behavior.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Fall Prevention Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program for Resident #60, who was identified as a high fall risk. Despite having a history of falls and being at risk due to cognitive impairment, dizziness, and other medical conditions, the facility did not implement effective fall prevention interventions. Resident #60 experienced multiple falls, including a significant incident on 09/04/24, where she was lowered to the floor by a State tested Nursing Assistant after becoming unsteady. Following this incident, the resident was found to have sustained acute fractures, which required emergency room evaluation. Resident #60's medical record indicated a history of heart failure, muscle weakness, depression, dementia, osteoporosis, osteopenia, and syncope. She was receiving hospice services for end-stage heart failure. The care plan included interventions such as encouraging slow position changes, moving her room to a higher traffic area, and using a personal alarm bed/chair. However, these interventions were not consistently reviewed or updated following each fall, and there was no evidence of a root cause analysis or trend identification to prevent further falls. The facility's incident logs and interviews with staff revealed that falls on 07/21/24, 07/28/24, 08/26/24, and 09/04/24 did not result in new fall interventions being implemented. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that interventions should have been implemented for each fall, but due to workload and staffing issues, this was not consistently done. The facility's policy on accident/incident reporting emphasized the need for prompt and thorough investigation and implementation of corrective actions, which was not adhered to in this case.
Resident Abuse by STNA During Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by a staff member. The incident involved a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) who slapped a resident's hand during care. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and required total care for incontinence, was unable to recall the incident. The facility's investigation revealed that the STNA reacted to the resident grabbing her by smacking the resident's hand, which was witnessed by another staff member. The resident involved had a history of dementia, high blood pressure, asthma, and muscle weakness, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The facility's records indicated that the resident required assistance with activities of daily living and had a care plan addressing resistive behavior due to dementia. The care plan included interventions such as reassuring the resident and attempting care at a later time if the resident was resistive. The facility's policy on abuse clearly stated that residents have the right to be free from abuse, including physical abuse. The policy defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury or punishment resulting in harm or mental anguish. Despite the STNA's training on abuse and dementia care, her actions were deemed inconsistent with the facility's standards, leading to her termination.
Misappropriation of Resident's Narcotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of narcotic medication belonging to a resident, identified as Resident #12. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a prescription for Percocet to manage pain associated with conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis. The medication was to be administered as needed, and records indicated it was given daily at bedtime throughout August. However, on August 17, facility staff discovered that eight tablets were missing from the resident's medication supply. A suspected perpetrator was identified, and the resident's physician and responsible party were notified. The resident reported no changes in health or awareness of the missing medication. During the investigation, it was found that the narcotic count sheet for Resident #12 was improperly handled, with a comment of completion and a signature from an LPN who had worked the previous night shift. The count sheet indicated eight tablets remained, but these were not accounted for in the medication card, which was found empty in a shred box. The LPN denied knowledge of the missing medication and was suspended pending investigation. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) initiated an investigation and filed a police report when the LPN could not be reached for further questioning. The facility's policy on abuse and misappropriation of resident property was reviewed, highlighting the residents' right to be free from such incidents. The investigation revealed that the narcotic medication card and count sheet did not match, leading to the conclusion that the medication was misappropriated. The facility took immediate steps to address the issue, including notifying the pharmacy and ensuring the resident's medication needs were met, although these actions are not detailed in this summary.
Failure to Maintain Appropriate Food Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was served at a palatable and warm temperature, affecting all residents who received meals from the kitchen. During an interview, a resident mentioned that the food was sometimes not very warm. Observations revealed that trays were being passed out of an open-air cart during the first lunch dining service. A test tray was prepared, and the temperatures of the food items were measured before and after delivery. Initially, the corn measured 139 degrees Fahrenheit, Spanish rice 142 degrees Fahrenheit, and tacos 160 degrees Fahrenheit. However, after being served from the open-air delivery cart, the temperatures dropped significantly to 109 degrees Fahrenheit for the corn, 118 degrees Fahrenheit for the Spanish rice, and 115 degrees Fahrenheit for the taco. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed that the food was lukewarm and/or cold upon serving, and the tortilla used for the taco was cold. Further interviews and observations revealed that the facility did not have a tray delivery policy. The Food Preparation policy dated 06/20/17 stated that dietary staff would ensure all foods are held at appropriate temperatures: greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit for hot foods and under 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold foods. The lack of an insulated delivery cart and the absence of a tray delivery policy contributed to the failure to maintain appropriate food temperatures, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide scheduled bathing for five residents who were dependent on staff for their activities of daily living (ADL). Resident #12, who had cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance for bathing, did not receive a shower or bed bath on multiple occasions over a 30-day period. Resident #12 expressed a preference for showers at least twice a week, which was not met. Corporate Nurse #100 confirmed the resident was not bathed as scheduled or preferred. Resident #22, who also had cognitive impairment and required physical assistance with showers and was totally dependent for bed baths, did not receive scheduled showers on several dates. The resident had a sign in their room indicating showers were scheduled for Mondays and Thursdays but reported not always receiving them twice a week. Corporate Nurse #100 verified the resident was not bathed as scheduled or preferred. Other residents, including Resident #28, Resident #30, and Resident #43, also did not receive their scheduled baths or showers. Resident #28, who required supervision or touching assistance for bathing, only received one shower in the 30-day period. Resident #30, who required partial to moderate assistance, missed multiple scheduled showers. Resident #43, who had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance, did not receive baths or showers as per their schedule and preference. The Director of Nursing confirmed the discrepancies in the bathing schedule for these residents.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions in a timely manner for six residents who had indwelling medical devices. Observations revealed that five residents with Foley catheters and one resident with a peritoneal dialysis site did not have the necessary enhanced barrier precautions in place. This deficiency was noted during an observation period from 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. on 05/13/24. The facility's policy mandates the use of enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), but these precautions were not implemented for the affected residents during the observed period. Interviews with facility staff revealed that education on enhanced barrier precautions was completed in April 2024, but the official roll-out was delayed due to supply shortages. The facility's commonly used supply company experienced delays and low stock of essential isolation supplies, including gowns and masks. Despite receiving some supplies from the Ohio Department of Health in late April, the facility had not yet implemented the necessary precautions as of 05/15/24. The supply company confirmed that they had to switch manufacturers due to back orders, which contributed to the delay in delivering the required supplies. The facility's failure to implement these precautions in a timely manner directly affected the six residents reviewed for infection control.
Failure to Maintain Correct Advance Directives in Medical Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to have the correct advance directives in Resident #22's medical record. Resident #22, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, mood disorder, and anxiety disorder, had advance directives documented as a full code on 06/15/23. However, an order was signed on 09/15/23 to change the code status to Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC)-Arrest. Despite this change, a review of the medical record at the nurse's station on 05/14/24 revealed no evidence of advance directives. An LPN verified that Resident #22 did not have advance directives in the medical record at the nurse's station, although the electronic record indicated a DNRCC-Arrest status. This deficiency affected one resident out of three reviewed for advance directives and had the potential to affect all 60 residents in the facility.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect Resident #4 from staff-to-resident physical abuse and Resident #17 from staff-to-resident verbal abuse. Resident #4, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting, was slapped on the back of the hand by STNA #102 during incontinence care. This incident was witnessed by STNA #5, who reported it to the Director of Nursing (DON). Despite conflicting accounts from STNA #102 and STNA #5, the facility's investigation confirmed that Resident #4 stated the slap hurt. STNA #102 was terminated following the incident, but there was no detailed documentation of the circumstances surrounding the termination in the Employee Change of Status Notification. The facility's abuse policy mandates thorough documentation and investigation of such incidents, which was not fully adhered to in this case. Resident #17, who was cognitively intact and required assistance for various activities of daily living, reported being verbally threatened by STNA #40. Resident #17 stated that STNA #40 threatened to break her other leg and yelled at her in front of a family member. This incident was reported to a housekeeper, who then informed the Social Service Director (SSD) #9. Despite Resident #17's complaints, the DON and other staff members did not have clear documentation or recall of the investigation's outcome. Interviews with various staff members, including STNA #40, revealed inconsistencies in the accounts of the incident, and there was no evidence that the incident was reported to the state agency as required. The facility's failure to document and thoroughly investigate these incidents of abuse, as well as the lack of proper reporting to the state agency, highlights significant deficiencies in their handling of abuse allegations. The facility's abuse policy requires comprehensive documentation and investigation, which was not adequately followed in these cases. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 60 residents in the facility, as it undermines the overall safety and well-being of the residents.
Failure to Report Allegation of Verbal Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of staff-to-resident verbal abuse against a resident to the state agency as required. The incident involved a resident who was cognitively intact and had various medical conditions, including polyneuropathy and morbid obesity. The resident reported that an STNA threatened to break her other leg and yelled at her in front of a family member. The resident initially reported the incident to a housekeeper, who then informed the Social Service Director (SSD). Despite these reports, the incident was not reported to the state agency, and the facility did not have documentation of the investigation or its results. Interviews with various staff members, including the SSD, DON, and ADON, revealed inconsistencies and a lack of clear documentation regarding the incident. The SSD mentioned that the resident had issues with an STNA but did not specify which one. The DON and ADON both indicated that they were aware of the incident but did not have any documentation to support that an investigation was conducted. The STNA involved in the incident admitted to having issues with the resident but denied any mistreatment. The DON and ADON both stated that the previous Administrator had decided the incident was not reportable. Further review of the facility's self-reported incidents to the state agency showed no evidence that this particular incident was reported. The facility's abuse policy requires that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, abuse, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and injuries of unknown origin be reported to the state agency within 24 hours. The failure to report this incident as required constitutes a deficiency in the facility's compliance with state regulations.
Failure to Investigate Abuse Allegations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for two residents, which had the potential to affect all 60 residents. For Resident #4, the incident involved an STNA allegedly slapping the back of the resident's hand during incontinence care. Despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment, the incident was reported by another STNA, and the resident indicated that the slap caused pain. However, the incident was not documented in the resident's medical record, and the investigation lacked a signed statement from the accused STNA. Additionally, there were no details provided regarding the STNA's termination, and the facility's abuse policy was not followed as required documentation and thorough investigation were missing. For Resident #17, the resident reported being threatened with bodily harm by an STNA. The resident stated that the STNA threatened to break her other leg and yelled at her in front of a family member. The incident was reported to a housekeeper and the Social Service Director, but the investigation was incomplete and lacked proper documentation. The DON and ADON were aware of the situation but did not have records of the investigation or statements from the involved parties. The facility also failed to report the incident to the state agency as required by their abuse policy. Both incidents highlight significant lapses in the facility's handling of abuse allegations, including inadequate documentation, incomplete investigations, and failure to follow established abuse policies. These deficiencies indicate a systemic issue in the facility's approach to ensuring resident safety and compliance with regulatory requirements.
Failure to Follow Bowel Policy and Maintain Hospice Communication Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its bowel policy for two residents, leading to prolonged periods without bowel movements and lack of appropriate medical intervention. Resident #22, who has cognitive impairment and is always continent of bowel, did not have a bowel movement for seven consecutive days. Despite the facility's policy requiring documentation of bowel movements each shift and intervention after three days without a bowel movement, there was no evidence that the physician was notified or that any stool softeners or laxatives were administered. Similarly, Resident #39, who also has cognitive impairment, did not have a bowel movement for four consecutive days without any documented intervention or physician notification, contrary to the facility's bowel policy. These failures were verified by Corporate Nurse #100 during an interview on 05/16/24. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that Hospice communication was onsite for Resident #9, who has severe cognitive impairment and is receiving Hospice services for congestive heart failure. When requested, the Hospice notes for Resident #9 were not available on-site. Registered Nurse #45 was unable to locate the Hospice communications in the resident's medical record or the Hospice binder. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not have the Hospice communication form on-site and had to contact the Hospice company to send over the notes for the last 30 days. This is in violation of the facility and Hospice agreement, which requires complete, accurate, and detailed clinical records to be readily available on request by authorized agencies.
Failure to Provide Adequate Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comprehensively assess and provide adequate interventions and treatment for a resident who developed stage III and stage II pressure ulcers on the buttocks. The resident, who had a history of type II diabetes, convulsions, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, and chronic kidney disease, was admitted on a specific date and later expired. The plan of care included interventions such as administering medications, applying treatments, encouraging repositioning, and notifying the physician or wound nurse practitioner as needed. However, there were no documented weekly skin assessments, and the pressure ulcers were not identified until they had progressed to stage II and stage III. The medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to hospice care, and the only skin assessments conducted in 2024 were on two specific dates, which showed no new skin areas. The wound nurse note indicated that the resident had new wounds to the buttocks, including a stage III pressure ulcer on the right buttock and a stage II pressure ulcer on the left buttock. The treatment ordered was barrier cream, but there was no documented evidence of the pressure ulcers until they were discovered by the nurse practitioner. Additionally, the order by the nurse practitioner was not implemented, and no new interventions were put in place after the development of the pressure ulcers. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the nurse practitioner revealed that the resident had been declining and often refused care, but no interventions were put in place for the resident's declining condition or refusal of care. The ADON confirmed that there were no weekly skin assessments and no documentation of skin impairment until the wounds were stage II and stage III. The facility's wound and skin care policy required documentation of pressure ulcers, including measurements and descriptions, but this was not followed. The hospice nurse confirmed that the hospice staff did not assess or provide treatment for the resident's pressure ulcers, and the facility nurses were responsible for the treatment.
Failure to Provide Nutritional Support
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to offer an alternative meal choice or nutritional shake for a resident when less than 50% of the meal was consumed. This deficiency affected one resident who had diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and venous insufficiency. The resident's medical record indicated a severely impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities and required supervision or assistance for eating. Despite a care plan that included offering food preferences and substitutions as needed, the resident's meal intake records showed that additional food or nutritional shakes were not offered when less than 51% of meals were consumed over a specified period. The resident's meal intakes from two separate time frames revealed that the resident often consumed less than 50% of meals. Despite this, there was no documented evidence that additional food or nutritional shakes were offered as required by the care plan. Interviews with the Cooperate Nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident did consume less than 50% of meals and that supplements were not offered. This failure to follow the care plan resulted in a deficiency in providing adequate nutritional support for the resident.
Failure to Ensure Completion of Dialysis Communication Forms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that dialysis communication forms were completed and returned post dialysis treatment for a resident who required such services. Specifically, Resident #267, who had diagnoses including acute kidney failure, dependence on renal dialysis, and hypertension, did not have completed dialysis communication forms for several dates. The resident's plan of care required monitoring and communication regarding dialysis treatments, but forms dated 05/04/24, 05/07/24, and 05/14/24 were not completed by the dialysis center. This issue was confirmed by Cooperation Nurse #100, who acknowledged difficulties in obtaining completed forms from the dialysis company. The facility's policy required the review of documentation sent with the resident upon return from dialysis and the implementation of new orders based on this documentation. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the incomplete or missing dialysis communication forms for Resident #267. This deficiency affected the resident's care and monitoring related to their dialysis treatments, as the necessary communication and documentation were not consistently provided or reviewed.
Failure to Address Pharmacy Recommendations in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for two residents. Resident #32, who has diagnoses including anxiety, heart disease, and a fracture of the left arm, was noted to receive antianxiety medication daily. Pharmacy recommendations dated 03/13/24 and 04/21/24 indicated that the PRN order for Hydroxyzine 25 mg every eight hours for anxiety/agitation required a stop date if continued beyond 14 days. There was no evidence that the physician reviewed or addressed these recommendations. This was confirmed during an interview with Cooperate Nurse #100 on 05/16/24. Resident #22, diagnosed with dementia, mood disorder, and anxiety disorder, received a pharmacy recommendation on 12/17/23 for a dose reduction of Seroquel (antipsychotic) from 200 mg daily to 150 mg daily. The physician did not address this recommendation until 01/17/24, resulting in a 30-day delay. This was verified by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #47 during an interview on 05/16/24. Both instances demonstrate the facility's failure to address pharmacy recommendations promptly, affecting the care of the residents involved.
Latest citations in Ohio
Surveyors found that multiple hazardous storage areas, including a closet near medical records, a beauty salon used to store chemical cases, a supply room in one nursing station, a room leading to a smoking area, a housekeeping room near therapy, and a lobby storage room, lacked required self-closing or automatic-closing doors. These conditions did not comply with NFPA 101 requirements for hazardous area enclosure and had the potential to affect all residents and staff in an emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility did not conduct fire drills on every shift each quarter and did not vary drill conditions as required by NFPA 101. Record review showed that one shift lacked a documented drill for an entire quarter, and the pattern of drill times and dates did not demonstrate varied conditions. The Maintenance Director confirmed the incomplete and noncompliant fire drill schedule, which affected all residents and staff emergency preparedness.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain clear egress corridors as required by NFPA 101, with a TV/video cart plugged into a corridor outlet and multiple unsecured chairs placed in the hallway near resident rooms and the secured unit dining room, including directly in front of a fire extinguisher. These items projected about 29 inches into an approximately eight-foot-wide corridor and were located in front of the handrail, potentially affecting 28 residents and staff’s ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director confirmed these corridor obstructions during the survey.
A resident with intact cognition receiving Medicare Part A skilled services for metabolic encephalopathy had services discontinued while benefit days remained, but the facility did not issue the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN). The Social Services Director later confirmed that no SNF ABN was provided and reported she believed only a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was needed when all skilled services were stopped. This practice conflicted with the facility’s written policy, which required SNF ABNs to be issued when extended care items or services were initiated, reduced, or terminated due to expected non-coverage by Medicare.
Surveyors identified that the facility exceeded the acceptable medication error rate when two residents with type 2 DM received insulin doses that were not administered according to orders or manufacturer instructions. In two separate observations, an LPN administered Novolog and another LPN administered insulin glargine and insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens, and the insulin lispro and Novolog were given after the residents had already consumed a significant portion of their breakfast meals, despite orders for administration before meals. Manufacturer information for both insulin products required priming before each injection to ensure accurate dosing, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and specified time frames.
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete crash cart audits for multiple full-code residents. Surveyors, accompanied by the DON, found that daily crash cart checks did not include verification of supply expiration dates, and that an extension cord documented as present on several audit dates was not actually in the cart. Audit logs also conflicted with the cart’s contents by indicating that required items such as eye protection, saline, and clear plastic were present when they were not. These findings were inconsistent with the facility’s policy requiring the crash cart to be checked every 24 hours and after each use, with prompt replacement of equipment and supplies.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure on supplemental O2, COPD, and cognitive risk factors was repeatedly documented as non-compliant with the smoking policy, including going out to smoke outside designated times and retaining cigarettes and lighters provided by family. Despite prior assessments identifying this resident as unsafe to smoke without supervision, a later assessment classified the resident as safe to smoke independently without documented rationale or care plan update. The resident subsequently went outside alone with an O2 nasal cannula in place, lit a cigarette, and sustained facial burns when the cannula ignited, as observed by staff and confirmed by EMS and ED records. In a separate case, another cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls had a care-planned intervention for non-skid strips in front of a recliner, but observation and staff confirmation showed the strips were not present, despite remaining on the active fall-risk care plan.
Multiple dependent residents did not receive scheduled showers, bed baths, or shaving as outlined in their care plans and the facility’s routine care policy. One resident recovering from spinal surgery missed numerous scheduled showers over several months. Another resident who relied on staff for self-care repeatedly requested shaving but was not shaved, and visible facial hair was observed after a recent shower. A resident with chronic respiratory failure and a tracheostomy, requiring substantial/maximal assist with personal hygiene, had no documented showers for an extended period and was observed with long facial hair, which staff acknowledged should be removed during bathing or as needed. A cognitively impaired resident with ESRD and CHF, scheduled for twice-weekly showers, had multiple undocumented or missed showers and reported not getting showers despite asking aides who said they lacked time. Another cognitively intact resident with hemiplegia and multiple comorbidities, also scheduled for twice-weekly showers, had several dates where documentation showed no shower/bath/bed bath provided or no entry at all, and she reported feeling unclean and unimportant when her showers were missed.
A resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for urinary retention, and care plan interventions requiring the drainage bag to be properly secured with a dignity cover, was observed seated in a chair with the catheter drainage bag uncovered and containing visible dark yellow urine that could be seen from the hallway. Later, an LPN confirmed the catheter bag was lying directly on the floor without a dignity cover. This situation occurred despite facility policy requiring care to be provided in a manner that respects and enhances each resident’s dignity and personal privacy.
A cognitively intact resident with chronic orthopedic pain had a PRN oxycodone order, but multiple doses were signed out on the narcotic log by an RN without corresponding entries on the MAR or documented pain assessments. A CNA/med tech reported frequent problems with this RN’s narcotic counts and documentation, describing erratic behavior when handling narcotic keys. The resident reported taking oxycodone only once or twice daily and otherwise using Tylenol, which conflicted with the number of oxycodone doses signed out. The facility’s investigation found it was inconclusive whether narcotics were misappropriated or whether there was a failure of documentation, but confirmed there was no evidence that all signed-out doses were administered.
Failure to Maintain Self-Closing Doors for Multiple Hazardous Storage Areas
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to hazardous area protection and door requirements under NFPA 101, 2012 Edition. During facility tours, they observed that multiple hazardous storage areas did not have self-closing or automatic-closing doors as required for hazardous areas such as combustible storage and chemical storage. These areas included a closet next to medical records, a beauty salon being used to store cases of chemicals, a supply room in Station #2, and the room leading to the smoking area in Station #3. On a subsequent tour, surveyors observed additional hazardous areas without self-closing doors. The housekeeping room across from therapy and the lobby storage room were both noted to lack self-closing door mechanisms. The facility census at the time was 59 residents, and the surveyors stated that this deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff's ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director verified these findings at the time they were observed.
Plan Of Correction
K 0321 This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be admissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 06/12/2026 K-0321 Doors with Self-Closing Devices Corrective action for resident/s: 1. The closet door next to medical records was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing device to closet door next to medical records on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. The beauty salon had chemicals stored in it on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director moved chemicals from beauty salon on 05/20/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. The supply room on station 2 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing door to supply room on station 2 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The room to the smoking area on station 3 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the smoking are on station 3 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The housekeeping room across from therapy was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the housekeeping room across from therapy gym on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 5. The lobby storage room was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the lobby storage room on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: LNHA and Maintenance director/designee completed a full facility audit for doors with self-closing devices on 05/26/2026. Any corrective action, including, doors identified as needing self-closures will be added on or before 06/09/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 sections 19.3.2.1 and 19.3.5.9 specifically regarding doors with self-closing devices. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Doors with Self-Closing device audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 06/12/2026
Failure to Conduct Required Quarterly Fire Drills on All Shifts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct fire drills in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.7.1 through 19.7.1.8, specifically by not holding drills every shift each quarter and not varying drill conditions as required. Record review on 06/09/25 at approximately 10:32 A.M. showed there was no fire drill conducted for the first shift during the third quarter. The documented first-shift fire drills occurred on 01/30/26 at 2:42 P.M., 04/30/26 at 1:51 P.M., and 10/31/25 at 10:58 A.M., indicating a missed quarter. Second-shift fire drills were recorded on 02/26/26 at 5:20 P.M., 06/03/25 at 4:35 P.M., 08/29/25 at 3:46 P.M., and 11/25/25 at 5:09 P.M., and third-shift drills on 02/28/26 at 11:47 P.M., 05/30/25 at 12:18 A.M., 07/22/25 at 11:34 P.M., 09/26/25 at 11:40 P.M., and 12/15/25 at 5:17 A.M. The surveyor determined that drills were not conducted under varied conditions and that the required quarterly drill on each shift was not consistently performed. The Maintenance Director confirmed these findings at the time they were identified, and the deficiency had the potential to affect all 59 residents and staff response in an emergency. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were described in the report; the deficiency related to facility-wide emergency preparedness practices and documentation of fire drills.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0712 Fire Drills Corrective action for resident/s: There were no records of a fire drill for the first shift of the third quarter of 2025. First shift fire drill completed on 5/24/2026 by maintenance director/designee with no findings or corrective action necessary. Identification of other residents who may be affected: On 5/26/2026 Maintenance director/designee completed 100% audit of the scheduled fire drills to ensure a drill is scheduled quarterly each shift with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.7.1.4 through 19.7.1.7. specifically including fire drill frequency requirements. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Fire Drill Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Obstructed Egress Corridors Due to Equipment and Chairs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain required clear egress widths in corridors in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.2.3.4 through 19.2.3.5 and 7.3.2 through 7.3.2.3, creating projections into the egress corridor that exceeded allowable limits. Surveyors observed that on one day in Station #3, a cart with a television and video equipment was plugged into an outlet in the corridor by room 38, and five activity room chairs were placed in the corridor near the secured unit dining room directly in front of a fire extinguisher. On the following day, surveyors again observed chairs in the Station #3 corridor, with four by room 35 and four by the activities room, and the same television cart still in the corridor; the chairs were not secured. The corridor was approximately eight feet wide, and the projections extended approximately 29 inches into the corridor in front of the handrail. These conditions had the potential to affect 28 residents in the facility and the staff’s ability to assist in an emergency, and the Maintenance Director confirmed the observations at the time of discovery. No specific resident medical histories or conditions were described in the report, only that 28 residents were potentially affected and the facility census was 59.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be subsequent remedial measures and should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0232 Clear path of egress Corrective action for resident/s: 1. On 05/18/2026 station 3 had a cart with a television parked in the corridor by room 38 that exceeded allowable limits. Maintenance director/designee moved the TV cart into the activity room, out to the corridor on 05/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. On 5/18/2026 station 3 had 5 chairs in the corridor near the dining room directly in front of the fire extinguisher. Maintenance director/designee moved the chairs into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. On 5/19/2026 station 3 had 4 chairs by the activity room and 4 by room 35. In addition, the TV cart was in the corridor. The maintenance director/designee moved the chairs and TV cart into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/19/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Maintenance director/designee completed a 100% facility audit for clear paths of egress on 5/26/26 with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: Maintenance Director/designee educated staff on 5/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.2.3.4 and 19.2.3.5 specifically including maintaining a clear path of egress. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Path of Egress Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Failure to Issue Required SNF ABN When Discontinuing Medicare Part A Services
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when Medicare Part A services were discontinued for a resident who still had available benefit days. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy and had intact cognition per the Minimum Data Set assessment. The facility’s own SNF Beneficiary Notification Review documented that Medicare Part A skilled services began on 02/11/26 and the last covered day was 03/11/26, and that the facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A services before the resident’s benefit days were exhausted. Despite this, no SNF ABN was provided to the resident or the resident’s representative. During interviews, the Social Services Director stated that the SNF ABN was issued hours prior to the last covered day but, upon reviewing her files, confirmed that no SNF ABN had actually been issued for this resident. She further explained that she believed an SNF ABN was only required if one skilled service remained and that if all skilled services were being discontinued, only the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) needed to be issued. The Administrator, however, stated that a resident should always receive both a SNF ABN and a NOMNC when Medicare Part A services are discontinued and benefit days remain. Review of the facility’s written policy dated 03/28/23 showed that the facility was required to issue SNF ABNs for initiation, reduction, or termination of extended care items or services when Medicare payment was not expected, which did not occur in this case.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 F-0582 Corrective action for resident/s: On 5/14/26 Resident #34 was informed of rights and responsibilities related to Advanced Beneficiary Notice and voiced understanding of information for future reference by administrator. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Any resident receiving skilled services from nursing or therapy services. The Administrator audited all residents who were discharged from skilled services in the past 30 days to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice on 5/29/26. No non-compliance was noted. Measures for systemic change: On 5/14/2026 Business Office Manager, Director of Rehab, Minimum Data Set nurse, Director of Nursing and Social Services Director were educated on proper procedure of issuing of Notice Of Medicare Non Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice by administrator. All upcoming discharges from skilled services will be reviewed weekly at Utilization Review meeting to ensure notices will be delivered timely. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Administrator or designee to complete audits of all residents being discharged from skilled services to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 5/29/26
Insulin Administration Errors and Failure to Prime Insulin Pens
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with surveyors identifying 3 errors out of 28 medication administration opportunities, resulting in a 10.71% error rate. For one resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate cognitive impairment, the physician’s order directed Novolog insulin 10 units via subcutaneous pen-injector to be given before meals. During an observed medication pass, the LPN administered 10 units of Novolog insulin without priming the pen and did so after the resident had already consumed approximately 50% of the breakfast meal. The LPN later confirmed she did not prime the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer instructions for the Novolog FlexPen specified that an air shot (priming) must be performed before each injection to ensure proper dosing. Another resident, also diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and with intact cognition, had orders for insulin glargine 35 units subcutaneously twice daily and insulin lispro 20 units subcutaneously before meals, plus 12 units subcutaneously if blood glucose was between 251 mg/dL and 300 mg/dL. During an observed medication administration, an LPN administered 35 units of insulin glargine and 32 units of insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens and after the resident had consumed approximately 90% of the breakfast meal, despite orders for insulin lispro to be given before meals. The LPN later stated she could not remember if she had primed the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer information for insulin lispro stated that the pen must be primed before each injection to confirm insulin delivery and remove air, and that failure to prime could result in too much or too little insulin. The DON confirmed the expectation that insulin be administered as ordered, including priming each pen with two units before dialing the prescribed dose, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and required time frames.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 5/29/2026. F-0759 Corrective action for resident/s: Residents #21 and #22 were assessed and evaluated by nurse and Director of Nursing 5/14/26. Resident #21 and #22 both denied any adverse effects and none were noted upon assessment by the Director of Nursing on 5/14/2026. Notification made to physician on 5/14/2026. LPN # 2 competency Eval on insulin administration with the Director of Nursing completed 5/14/2026. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Diabetic residents on assignment of LPN #2/station 2 have the potential to be affected and were assessed by the DON/Designee on 5/14/26 and found to be within normal limits. Measures for systemic change: All Nurses were educated by the Director of Nursing on the steps for Insulin administration per competency, diabetes clinical protocol policy, Medication and treatment orders policy, administering medications policy, and Obtaining fingerstick Glucose Level policy On 5/14/2026. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing will complete insulin administration audits on 5 nurses. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance: 5/29/2026
Inaccurate Crash Cart Audits and Missing Emergency Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate and complete crash cart audits for residents requiring basic life support, affecting eighteen of thirty-five residents who were designated as full code. During an observation of the crash cart with the DON, surveyors found that the daily audit documentation for the month did not include verification of expiration dates for crash cart supplies. Review of the crash cart audit logs showed that an extension cord was documented as being in the cart on multiple dates, but the extension cord was not present in the cart at the time of inspection. Additionally, the audit documentation indicated that required items, including eye protection, saline, and clear plastic, were not present in the crash cart, yet they were documented as being in the cart. The facility’s undated “Emergency Crash Cart” policy stated that the crash cart is to be checked every 24 hours and after every use, and that equipment and supplies are to be noted and replaced promptly, but the observed documentation and contents of the cart did not match these requirements. This deficiency was verified with the DON at the time of the survey and was cited under the requirement that personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to residents requiring emergency care, subject to physician orders and advance directives, and was investigated under Complaint Number 2687380.
Plan Of Correction
Cridersville Care Center Provider Number:366171 Survey Type: Complaint Survey Survey Date: 04/29/26 This Plan of Correction (PoC) outlines the actions completed by the facility with regards to the deficiency citation. This Plan of correction does not constitute any admission of guilt or liability by the facility and is submitted only in response to the regulatory requirements. Please accept the following as the facility's credible allegation of compliance as of 4/30/26. F678 CPR All Full Code residents #18 have the potential to be affected by the alleged deficiency. On 4/27/26 the DON/ADON re-stocked the crash cart per the inventory sheet for all missing items. Crash cart inventory sheet updated and new one will go into effect on 5/1/26. All licensed nursing staff provided with training related to crash cart inventory being a daily audit review using inventory sheet on 4/27/26 per DON/designee. The DON/designee will conduct clinical rounds and conduct a random audit of crash cart three times per week for 4 (four) weeks to ensure compliance. The results of the audit will be documented. The facility conducted an Ad-Hoc QAPI meeting on 4/27/26 and discussed the alleged deficiency and corrective actions. Date when corrective action will be completed: 4/30/26
Unsafe Smoking Practices with Oxygen and Missed Fall-Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide a safe smoking environment, adequate supervision, and appropriate implementation of its smoking policy for a resident who used oxygen and smoked, as well as failure to implement fall-prevention interventions as care planned for another resident. One resident had multiple relevant diagnoses, including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, COPD, end-stage renal disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, diabetes, and necrotizing fasciitis. Her care plans identified impaired visual function, risk for respiratory complications related to a history of smoking, and risk for cognitive decline, with interventions including use of oxygen per order and observation for understanding. A smoking-related care plan created earlier documented that she wished to use smoking products, had been assessed as safe to smoke "with supervision," and was non-compliant with the smoking policy, with family continuing to provide smoking supplies despite education and a verbal warning for non-compliance. Smoking assessments and progress notes showed a pattern of non-compliance and inconsistent classification of this resident’s smoking safety. Multiple smoking observation/assessments completed earlier in March documented that she had no cognitive loss, visual deficits, or dexterity problems but was unsafe to smoke without supervision because she did not return smoking materials and did not follow designated smoke times. Progress notes described her going out to smoke multiple times by herself or with family, including sneaking out next door with a cigarette and going out multiple times in one evening, with staff documenting that she was "reeducated" and that family brought in cigarettes and lighters which she did not return to staff. Despite this history, a smoking assessment completed after a three-day hospital stay assessed her as safe to smoke without supervision, with no documentation explaining how this conclusion was reached or evidence that her care plan was updated accordingly. On the day of the incident, the resident reported she had cigarettes and a lighter on her person after returning from dialysis and stated she "could not find a nurse" and went outside to smoke, saying she "guessed" she forgot she had her oxygen on. A CNA observed her outside and saw a flame coming through the resident’s oxygen nasal cannula tubing, turned off the oxygen tank, removed the tubing, and patted out sparks on the resident’s shirt sleeve. The resident’s face and hands appeared black in color, and EMS documented first-degree burns to the head and face, with the resident stating she lit a cigarette with her nasal cannula on, causing the burn. The hospital record described her face as black from smoke and her lips and mouth as "burnt and charred," with a recommendation for intubation that she refused. The facility’s incident report recorded that she went outside with oxygen on to smoke without notifying staff, that staff witnessed the occurrence as she walked through the dining room door to the courtyard, and that she stated she thought she had turned her oxygen off. The facility’s smoking policy required interdisciplinary evaluation to determine safe versus unsafe smokers, staff maintenance of all smoking paraphernalia for both safe and unsafe smokers, and progressive consequences for policy violations. A separate deficiency involved another resident at risk for falls whose care plan included use of non-skid strips on the floor in front of her recliner as a fall-prevention intervention. This resident had severe cognitive impairment, used a walker and wheelchair, required supervision or touching assistance for transfers and ambulation, and had experienced two or more falls without injury since the prior assessment. The fall-risk care plan, initiated at admission, specified non-skid strips in front of the recliner beginning in November. However, nursing staff interviewed were not familiar with all of the resident’s fall-prevention interventions without checking the record, and observation of the room showed two recliners with no non-skid strips on the floor in front of them. An LPN confirmed that the non-skid strips were not present despite the intervention remaining active in the care plan, and moving the recliners did not reveal any strips. The facility’s fall management policy required identification of hazards and risk factors, implementation of interventions to minimize falls and injuries, and development and implementation of a care plan based on interdisciplinary evaluation, with interventions related to identified risk factors.
Plan Of Correction
Smoking: On 03/21/26 at 3:16 P.M. 911 response was activated for Resident #11 and Medical Director #601 was notified by Registered Nurse (RN) #322. On 03/21/26 at 3:18 P.M. on-call Nurse/Social Services #423 immediately notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) #304 of the incident involving Resident #11. On 03/21/26 at 3:22 P.M. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived onsite. At 3:30 P.M. Resident #11 was transported to the emergency room. On 03/21/26 at 3:30 P.M. RN #322 completed a smoking re-assessment of Resident #11 assessing the resident to be an unsafe smoker requiring supervision due to failure to remove oxygen prior to entering designated smoking area. On 03/21/26 from 3:38 P.M. through 7:57 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #337, #336, #335, #338; RN #334, and DON #304 re-assessed residents (who smoke). This included Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, and Resident #10 to determine smoking safety (via smoking assessment). Each resident was re-educated regarding the facility smoking policy and staff verified there were no smoking materials on their person. The residents' smoking materials would be maintained by facility staff and distributed per policy. On 03/21/26 at 4:30 P.M. DON #304 responded to facility and an Ad Hoc (not scheduled) Quality Assurance (QA) meeting was held via telephone with the Administrator, DON #304 and Medical Director #601 to review investigative findings and plan of action. A root cause analysis was completed and determined Resident #11 had smoking materials on her person (believed to be obtained from family without staff knowledge) and failed to remove her oxygen. The QA team discussed a corrective action plan. On 03/21/26 from 5:00 P.M through 03/22/26 at 3:00 P.M. 26 RNs, 13 LPNs, one medical technician (MT), 54 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) four activities staff, one central supply staff, 11 dietary staff, 12 housekeeping staff, three laundry staff, one medical records staff, two social designees, two maintenance staff, nine administrative staff, and 19 therapy staff (158 staff at the time of the incident) were provided education regarding the facility smoking policy by DON #304 and the Administrator. This was completed via 1:1, small group in-services or via phone. Newly hired staff would receive education during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy. On 03/21/26 at 5:00 P.M. DON #304 completed an audit of all residents who smoke (Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, and Resident #10) to verify smoking evaluations and plans of care accurately reflected the residents' smoking safety needs. The residents were educated on the facility smoking policy, and smoking materials were to be maintained at the nurses' station. An audit was completed which included verification of required safety measures present in designated smoking areas, including an ash can, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, ash trays and no oxygen signs. There were no identified concerns or changes made because of the audits. On 03/21/26 at 8:55 P.M. Resident #11 returned from the ED. LPN #332 verbally educated the resident regarding the facility smoking policy which included the need for supervision, a smoking apron (to be worn) and the facility smoke times. LPN #332 verified no smoking materials were on the resident's person or in her room at this time. On 03/23/26 at 11:00 A.M. the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) (Administrator, DON #304, Medical Director #601, RN #302, Social Services #427, Social Services #423, DON #300, and Maintenance #436) met in-person to review the plan of action with DON #304/designee to complete weekly monitoring of residents who smoke and designated smoking areas weekly for four weeks with Housekeeping responsible to complete the cleaning. Housekeeping staff were responsible for cleaning ashtrays and the designated smoking area daily. Audits to be reviewed and any further actions required to be directed by the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee during scheduled meetings. The IDT also reviewed all current smoking assessments and care plans for residents who smoke. Resident #50 required a change in supervision levels with smoking due to cognition levels and her plan of care as well as Resident #11's plan of care was updated to reflect supervision/safety. On 03/23/26 from 3:45 P.M. to 8:55 P.M. Social Services #423 re-educated residents who smoke (Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, Resident #10) and responsible parties, if applicable regarding the facility smoking policy and supervision levels. On 03/23/26 at12:13 P.M. Social Services #427 contacted Resident #11's family member (#602) to schedule a care conference. Family member #602 and Family Member #603 were not available to meet until 03/27/26. On 03/23/26 at 1:00 P.M. staff education related to smoking areas, removal of oxygen prior to entering smoking area and maintaining smoking materials at the nurses' station for residents who smoke was initiated by DON #304 and the Administrator via 1:1, small group in-services or via phone call. Education was completed for all 158 staff by 03/24/26 at 1:00 P.M. Newly hired staff would be educated during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy. The facility does not utilize agency staff. On 03/27/26 at 11:00 A.M. a care conference was held with Resident #11 and Family Members #602 and #603, the Administrator, Social Services #423 and Social Services #427. The facility smoking policy was reviewed. The resident and family were informed an involuntary discharge would be initiated should the resident exhibit non-compliance moving forward and supervision would be increased beyond the two-hour standard of care to monitor more closely for non-compliance with the facility smoking policy. Family Member #602 stated he educated his siblings as well. On 04/10/26 at 2:00 P.M. DON #304 initiated education with 26 RNs and 13 LPNs (100% of nurses educated) regarding completion of the smoking evaluation via 1:1, small group in-services, or phone. The education was completed by 6:00 P.M. on 04/10/26. A new resident who smokes must remain supervised until the interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviews and determines smoking safety, at which time the care plan is developed and resident and family education is provided. The communication through the staff would be the care plan. Newly hired staff receive education during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy and completion of smoking evaluation via Point Click Care (PCC). On 04/10/26 at 4:29 P.M. DON #304 initiated an order in PCC for the nurse to verify, each shift, that Resident #11's smoking materials were maintained at the nurses' station. On 04/13/26 at 5:30 P.M. DON #304 initiated orders in PCC for nurses to verify, each shift, that all residents who smoke would have smoking materials maintained at the nurses' station. An updated list of smokers included: Resident #60, Resident #50, Resident #11, Resident #86, Resident #113, and Resident #151. On 04/13/26 at 5:45 P.M. DON #304 initiated questionnaires for staff regarding the smoking policy with re-education provided as needed via 1:1 and small group in-services for staff currently in the facility with all staff to be questioned/educated prior to working their next scheduled shift. Falls: On 4/9/26, Maintenance Director placed non-skid strips on the floor in front of Resident #12's recliner. Like Residents are identified as residents who have had a fall within the facility. Utilizing the Fall Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, an audit of falls and appropriate interventions for the past 30 days will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure fall interventions are in place per plan of care. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or F 0689 before 5/13/26. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses and STNA/CNAs on the Fall Management Policy to include fall interventions to be in place per the care plan. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. Utilizing the Fall Management Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of new admissions, new readmissions and residents who experience a fall within the last 7 days, weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure fall safety interventions are in place per plan of care. Current fall interventions found to not be in place will be corrected with all intervention in place per plan of care. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Removal Plan
- Activated 911 response for Resident #11 and notified the Medical Director.
- On-call Nurse/Social Services immediately notified the Administrator and DON of the incident.
- EMS arrived onsite and Resident #11 was transported to the emergency room.
- Completed a smoking re-assessment of Resident #11, determining the resident was an unsafe smoker requiring supervision due to failure to remove oxygen prior to entering the designated smoking area.
- Re-assessed all residents who smoke (Residents #22, #3, #47, #50, #60, #150, #86, and #10) to determine smoking safety via smoking assessment.
- Re-educated residents who smoke regarding the facility smoking policy and verified there were no smoking materials on their person.
- Implemented that smoking materials would be maintained by facility staff and distributed per policy.
- Held an ad hoc QA meeting to review investigative findings and plan of action.
- Completed a root cause analysis determining Resident #11 had smoking materials on her person and failed to remove oxygen.
- Developed a corrective action plan.
- Provided facility-wide education to staff on the facility smoking policy.
- Implemented that newly hired staff would receive smoking policy education during orientation.
- Completed an audit of all residents who smoke to verify smoking evaluations and plans of care accurately reflected smoking safety needs.
- Ensured smoking materials were maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Audited designated smoking areas for required safety measures (ash can, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, ash trays, and no-oxygen signs).
- Provided verbal education to Resident #11 on smoking policy (supervision, smoking apron, smoke times).
- Verified no smoking materials were on Resident #11’s person or in her room.
- Conducted an in-person IDT meeting to implement weekly monitoring of residents who smoke and designated smoking areas weekly for four weeks.
- Assigned housekeeping to clean ashtrays and the designated smoking area daily.
- Directed audits to be reviewed by QAPI.
- Reviewed all current smoking assessments and care plans for residents who smoke.
- Updated Resident #50’s supervision level.
- Updated Resident #11’s plan of care to reflect supervision/safety.
- Re-educated residents who smoke and responsible parties (as applicable) regarding the facility smoking policy and supervision levels.
- Contacted Resident #11’s family to schedule a care conference.
- Initiated additional staff education regarding smoking areas, removal of oxygen prior to entering smoking area, and maintaining smoking materials at the nurses’ station.
- Held a care conference with Resident #11 and family to review smoking policy.
- Informed resident/family that involuntary discharge would be initiated for future non-compliance.
- Increased supervision beyond the two-hour standard of care to monitor more closely for non-compliance.
- Provided education to all nurses regarding completion of the smoking evaluation.
- Implemented that new residents who smoke must remain supervised until IDT review determines smoking safety and care plan/education are completed.
- Entered an order in PCC for nursing to verify each shift that Resident #11’s smoking materials were maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Entered orders in PCC for nursing to verify each shift that all residents who smoke have smoking materials maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Initiated staff questionnaires regarding the smoking policy with re-education as needed.
- Required all staff to be questioned/educated prior to working their next scheduled shift.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Shaving Assistance for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide scheduled and needed bathing and shaving assistance to multiple dependent residents in accordance with their care plans, preferences, and the facility’s routine care policy. One resident with spinal stenosis and recent L2–L5 decompression fixation fusion was care planned for substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bath and toileting hygiene and was scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Fridays. Electronic documentation from early January through early April showed this resident did not receive a shower or bed bath on 11 identified scheduled days, and the DON confirmed these missed bathing events. Another resident with dysphagia and developmental issues, who required assistance with self-care and mobility, reported that she asked staff to shave her but they did not, which bothered her. During an observation following a recent shower, she stated she had not been shaved and that the hair "itched"; small gray hairs were visible on her chin. A CNA confirmed the presence of gray chin hairs and acknowledged the resident needed shaving, stating it would be addressed with the next scheduled shower. A further resident with chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, heart failure, moderate intellectual disabilities, anxiety, depression, and PTSD required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene and had a care plan for assistance with self-care, including personal hygiene. Her shower schedule called for showers on Monday and Thursday nights, with complete shaves for men and women. Review of documentation showed her last recorded shower/bath was nearly a year earlier, with no indication of additional personal hygiene or facial hair removal on that date. Observations on two separate days showed long white hairs on her chin and jaw line, which a CNA later confirmed, stating facial hair removal should occur with baths/showers or as needed. A resident with end stage renal disease, respiratory failure, hyperlipidemia, and congestive heart failure, who had impaired cognition and required partial/moderate assistance with bathing and personal hygiene, was scheduled for showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Review of shower documentation from admission through early April revealed no showers provided or refusals documented on at least ten scheduled shower days. In interviews, this resident reported not receiving scheduled showers, was unsure of his shower days, and stated he could use a good scrub down, adding that he had asked aides who told him they did not have time. A CNA explained that shower days appear on shower sheets and in the computer and that CNAs are supposed to document daily, with nurses checking the documentation; the DON verified the resident had not received showers per schedule or preference. Another resident with a fracture of the lower end of the left humerus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis after cerebral infarction, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertensive heart disease, urinary retention, and osteoarthritis was care planned as non–weight bearing to the left upper extremity and requiring substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing. Her electronic record showed she was scheduled for showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. The shower task question "did the resident receive a shower/bath/bed bath?" was documented as "no" on three dates, indicating no shower/bath/bed bath was completed, and left unanswered on three additional dates. The DON confirmed that one missed shower was due to an outside appointment, that on two dates the "no" response meant no bathing of any type occurred, and that on three dates there was no documentation at all. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported that missing showers made her feel unimportant compared to others and that she did not feel clean when her shower was missed. Facility policy on routine resident care stated that showers, tub baths, and shampoos are to be scheduled according to person-centered care or state guidelines, with additional showers given upon request, but the documented and observed care did not reflect consistent provision of scheduled bathing and shaving for these residents.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #5 received a shower by the STNA on 4/13/26. Resident #8 received a shower by the STNA on 4/8/26. Resident #9 received a shower and had their chin shaved by the STNA on 4/14/26. Resident #70 received a shower by the STNA on 4/13/26. Resident #76 received a shower and had their chin shaved by the STNA on 4/15/26. 2. Like residents are identified as residents who need assistance with showering and shaving. Utilizing the Shower Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, an audit of like residents will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure that showers and resident shaving are completed. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses and STNA's on the Routine Resident Care Policy to include bathing and shaving residents. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Shower Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of 4-6 residents weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure that showers and resident shaving are completed. Noncompliance found during audits will be addressed and assistance with showers and/or shaving provided. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Uncovered Urinary Catheter Drainage Bag Compromises Resident Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident’s right to privacy and dignity related to management of an indwelling urinary catheter. A resident admitted with malignant neoplasm of the esophagus and type II diabetes mellitus had a care plan identifying risk for urinary tract infection and catheter-related trauma due to an indwelling catheter for urinary retention. The care plan interventions included ensuring the catheter tubing was secured and the drainage bag was properly secured with a dignity cover in place. Physician orders directed that the resident’s 16 French indwelling urinary catheter be changed every 30 days and as needed, and the comprehensive MDS documented that the resident had an indwelling catheter and was cognitively intact. During observation, the resident was seen seated in a chair with the urinary catheter drainage bag hanging from the chair without a dignity cover, and dark yellow urine was visible in the bag from the hallway. In a later observation and interview, an LPN confirmed that the catheter bag was lying directly on the floor and did not have a dignity cover. Attempts to interview the resident to confirm cognitive status were unsuccessful, as the resident was unable to answer screening questions. Review of the facility’s “Resident Dignity & Personal Privacy” policy stated that the facility should provide care in a manner that respects and enhances each resident’s dignity, individuality, and right to personal property, which was not followed in this instance when the catheter drainage bag was left uncovered and visible.
Plan Of Correction
The Laurels of Athens wishes to have this plan of correction submitted as our written allegation of compliance. Preparation and/or execution of this plan of correction does not constitute admission to nor agreement with, either the existence of, or the scope and severity of, any of the cited deficiencies or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. This plan is prepared and/or executed to ensure continuing compliance with regulatory requirements. Our alleged date of compliance is 5/13/2026. 1. On 4/6/26, Resident #92's catheter bag was removed from the floor, the bag changed and covered for dignity by the licensed nurse. Resident #92 discharged from the facility on 4/11/26. 2. Like Residents are identified as residents who utilize urinary catheters. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee for like residents utilizing the Urinary Catheter Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC to ensure catheter bags are covered for dignity and not laying directly on the floor. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses on the Indwelling Urinary Catheter Policy as well as Resident Dignity & Personal Privacy Policy to include privacy covers are in place for urinary catheters and that the catheter is not laying on the floor. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Urinary Catheter Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of all residents with catheters weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure catheter bags are covered for dignity and not laying directly on the floor. Any catheters found to be touching the floor or uncovered will be removed from the floor, the bag changed and covered for dignity. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Failure to Prevent Possible Misappropriation and Poor Documentation of PRN Narcotics
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failure to prevent potential misappropriation of a resident’s narcotic medication and failure to ensure accurate documentation of controlled substance administration. A cognitively intact resident with chronic pain related to an internal orthopedic device and left knee pain had an order for oxycodone 5 mg PO every four hours PRN for pain and a care plan directing staff to administer medications as ordered and observe for effectiveness and side effects. The resident’s MDS showed she rated her pain as 7/10 and received opioid medication. However, review of the February MAR and the narcotic log revealed multiple discrepancies between narcotic sign-outs and documented administration. On several occasions, oxycodone doses were signed out on the narcotic log by an RN without corresponding documentation on the MAR. Specifically, oxycodone was signed out on one evening at 9:30 p.m. with no MAR entry, and again on a subsequent night at 1:30 a.m. and 5:30 a.m. with no MAR entries for those times. Another dose was signed out at 9:00 p.m. while the MAR reflected administration at 10:16 p.m., and a later dose at 5:30 a.m. was documented on both the narcotic log and MAR. There was also no documentation of pain assessments before or after PRN opioid administration. These documentation gaps meant there was no evidence that all narcotic doses signed out were actually administered to the resident. Staff interviews further highlighted concerns about the handling of narcotics. A CNA/med tech reported frequently taking the narcotic keys from the RN and described the RN’s behavior as erratic, with repeated problems involving incorrect narcotic counts and missing documentation on both the MAR and narcotic log. The resident stated she did not receive oxycodone more than once or twice a day, preferring to take Tylenol the rest of the time, which conflicted with the number of oxycodone doses signed out. When questioned, the RN gave inconsistent explanations about how often she pulled and administered PRN narcotics and acknowledged struggling with the new system, while also suggesting the resident may have received PRN tizanidine instead of remembering oxycodone. The facility’s investigation concluded that evidence was inconclusive as to whether misappropriation occurred or whether the issue was solely lack of documentation, but confirmed there was no evidence the resident received all doses signed out on the narcotic log.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #99 had a Self-Reported Incident submitted and investigated via the EIDC on 3/2/26. The investigation was inconclusive as we could not prove that misappropriation occurred. On 2/24/26, Resident #99 was interviewed and pain assessed by Director of Nursing and resident had no ill effects related to the inconsistent documentation in the medical record as it relates to her controlled substance pain medication. 2. Like Residents are identified as residents who utilize controlled substance PRN pain medications. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee for like residents utilizing the Controlled Substance Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC to ensure PRN controlled substance pain medications that are signed off the control sheet are documented in the resident medical record as well. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses on the Controlled Substances Policy to include appropriate documentation of controlled substances. In addition, the licensed nurses will be re-educated by the Director of Nursing or designee on the Abuse Prohibition Policy to include misappropriation of resident property. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Controlled Substance Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit three controlled substance sheets from each of the nine medication carts for a total of twenty-seven sheets weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure PRN controlled substance pain medications that are signed off the control sheet are documented in the resident medical record as well. Inconsistencies noted from the audit will be investigated for misappropriation. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



