Briarfield Manor
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Youngstown, Ohio.
- Location
- 461 South Canfield Niles Road, Youngstown, Ohio 44515
- CMS Provider Number
- 365822
- Inspections on file
- 26
- Latest survey
- March 20, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 5
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Briarfield Manor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors determined that the facility failed to consistently follow its policy requiring two nurses to count and sign for controlled substances at shift change. Review of narcotic count sheets for several medication stations over multiple weeks showed repeated instances where a second nurse’s signature was missing, indicating that the required dual-nurse verification of narcotic counts was not documented. This issue involved all residents receiving narcotic medications during the review period and was confirmed by the facility Administrator.
A resident with small B-cell lymphoma and intact cognition had physician orders for nightly Ibrutinib capsules, including a specified hold period. Review of MARs showed that several doses were not administered on multiple days outside the ordered hold period, and there was no documentation in the record explaining the missed doses. The DON later reported that the pharmacy did not have the medication and believed the oncologist had stopped it, but this was not supported by any written orders or documentation, resulting in a significant medication error.
The facility did not follow its policy requiring daily temperature checks of medication refrigerators, with multiple days lacking documented temperatures across several nursing stations and an entire month of logs missing. The Administrator confirmed the missing entries, and the DON reported that prior month temperature logs could not be located. This failure in monitoring and documentation affected the storage conditions of medications for all residents whose drugs were kept in these refrigerators.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions received a dose of oxycodone with acetaminophen that was later wasted by an LPN, who forged another nurse's initials on the controlled drug record instead of obtaining a proper witness signature as required by policy. This resulted in inaccurate documentation of the destruction of a controlled substance.
A deficiency was cited due to the facility not ensuring an area was free from accident hazards and not providing adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The report highlights insufficient safety measures and lack of proper oversight, but does not specify individual residents or staff involved.
The facility failed to provide adequate pain management for two residents, resulting in actual harm. One resident, admitted with chronic pain, did not receive their prescribed opioid medication, leading to severe pain and limited functional abilities. Another resident with a history of cerebral infarction experienced inadequate pain assessments and inconsistent medication administration, limiting their functional activities. The facility's pain policy was not followed, resulting in prolonged discomfort for the residents.
The facility did not follow the planned dinner menu, omitting bread and margarine for residents on regular and mechanical soft diets. Several residents expressed a desire for bread with their meal, and the Food and Nutrition Services Manager confirmed the oversight. This affected residents with various medical conditions, who were on specific diets and at nutritional risk.
The facility failed to provide substantial evening snacks to residents when the time between dinner and breakfast exceeded 14 hours. Observations and interviews revealed that only residents with labeled snacks received them, and several residents expressed hunger and a desire for snacks. The Food and Nutrition Services Manager confirmed the extended meal span and lack of routine snack offerings.
The facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary conditions for tube feeding and IV poles, affecting five residents. Observations showed dried tube feed or debris on the poles, confirmed by staff who were unsure of cleaning responsibilities. Residents requiring enteral feeding or IV therapy were affected, with poles showing significant dirt and rust, indicating a lack of proper maintenance.
The facility did not provide an alternative vegetable for residents who disliked Brussel sprouts during a dinner service, affecting nine residents. Observations confirmed that no substitute was prepared, and interviews revealed residents were left without a vegetable and felt hungry. The facility's menu cycle lacked alternative vegetable options, contrary to policy.
A resident with Alzheimer's and impaired cognition experienced a skin tear during a transfer, which was not communicated to her family. The LPN involved did not recall notifying the family, and the progress notes lacked documentation of such notification. The resident's daughter confirmed she was unaware of the injury.
The facility failed to implement grooming care plans for two residents, resulting in unkempt fingernails and inadequate hygiene. Despite care plans requiring assistance, staff did not document attempts to provide nail care or notify relevant parties of refusals. Observations revealed long, dirty fingernails, indicating a lapse in adherence to care plans and documentation practices.
The facility failed to administer treatments according to physician orders for two residents and did not document vital signs for another resident, leading to hospitalization. A resident with chronic heart failure did not receive prescribed Tubi grips due to incorrect documentation, while another with respiratory failure had no vital signs recorded during a change in condition. Additionally, a resident with chronic kidney disease did not receive necessary Lasix doses despite significant weight increases.
A facility failed to implement timely fall prevention interventions for a resident with a history of falls and multiple medical conditions. Despite ordering a perimeter mattress to prevent further falls, observations revealed that the mattress was not placed on the resident's bed after delivery. Interviews with staff confirmed the oversight, contributing to the deficiency in ensuring a safe environment for the resident.
A resident with a femur fracture and incontinence issues was not provided timely incontinence care as per the scheduled toileting program. Despite being on a schedule, staff interviews and observations revealed that the resident was not toileted or checked according to the plan, and care was often provided only upon request. The resident was unaware of the schedule, and staff admitted to not adhering to it, leading to a deficiency in care.
The facility failed to monitor and document fluid restrictions for two residents, compromising their nutritional management. One resident with chronic kidney disease and CHF had no documentation of nursing-provided fluids, while another resident with heart failure was unaware of their fluid restriction, and nursing staff did not document fluid intake. This deficiency resulted from the lack of adherence to facility policy requiring documentation of fluid allotments.
A facility failed to ensure proper communication with a dialysis center for a resident requiring dialysis services. Despite having a care plan that included monitoring for dialysis complications, the facility did not consistently receive communication sheets from the dialysis center after treatments. Staff interviews revealed that while attempts were made to obtain missing information, these were not always documented. The resident's medical records showed missing communication sheets for numerous sessions over nearly three months.
A facility failed to maintain accurate infection control logs and implement appropriate isolation precautions for a resident with MRSA. Despite orders for Vancomycin and enhanced barrier precautions due to a central line IV catheter, no isolation signs were posted, and staff were unaware of necessary precautions. The infection control log inaccurately recorded the resident's condition, leading to a deficiency in infection prevention and control.
Failure to Consistently Complete Dual-Nurse Narcotic Count Verification
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors found that the facility did not consistently ensure proper reconciliation of narcotic medications in accordance with its Controlled Substance Shift to Shift Count Policy, which required all narcotic medications to be counted and verified by two nurses at each shift-to-shift handoff, with both nurses signing the count sheet. Review of narcotic Controlled Substance Count Sheets for multiple medication stations over a period from early February to late March showed missing second nursing signatures on several dates, indicating that the required dual-nurse verification was not documented. Specifically, Station #1’s count sheet lacked a second nurse signature on one date, Station #2’s count sheet lacked a second nurse signature on three dates, and Station #4’s count sheet lacked a second nurse signature on three dates. This deficiency had the potential to affect 17 residents who received narcotic medications from the facility. During an interview, the Administrator confirmed these findings. No additional resident-specific medical histories or conditions related to this deficiency were described in the report.
Failure to Administer Ordered Cancer Medication and Document Missed Doses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors when ordered doses of Ibrutinib, a targeted cancer medication for lymphoma, were not administered and lacked documented justification. The resident, who had intact cognition and diagnoses including small B-cell lymphoma, difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, and cardiomegaly, was admitted and later discharged in January. Physician orders directed Ibrutinib 140 mg, three capsules by mouth at bedtime, with one order active from early January until mid-January and a subsequent order active from mid-January with a specified hold period and later discontinuation. Review of the MARs showed that Ibrutinib was not given on multiple dates outside the ordered hold period, and the medical record contained no evidence explaining these missed doses. In an interview, the DON stated that the pharmacy did not have the medication available and that she believed the oncologist had stopped it, but she confirmed that this information was not documented in the medical record, contrary to the facility’s policy requiring medications to be administered in accordance with written prescriber orders. This deficiency was cited as non-compliance under Complaint Numbers 2786595 and 2704190.
Failure to Perform and Document Daily Medication Refrigerator Temperature Checks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medication refrigerators were monitored and maintained according to its policy requiring daily temperature checks for all medication storage refrigerators. Review of the Station #1 Unit Temp Log Check form for 03/01/26 to 03/20/26 showed no documented refrigerator temperatures on 03/05/26, 03/13/26, and 03/19/26. Review of the Station #2 Unit Temp Log Check form for the same period showed no documented refrigerator temperatures on 03/02/26, 03/03/26, 03/04/26, 03/05/26, 03/07/26, 03/08/26, 03/09/26, 03/10/26, 03/12/26, and 03/13/26. Review of the Station #4 Unit Temp Log Check form for 03/01/26 to 03/20/26 showed no documented refrigerator temperature on 03/17/26. The Administrator confirmed these missing temperature checks during an interview, and the DON confirmed that the refrigerator temperature logs for 02/01/26 to 02/28/26 were missing and could not be located. The undated Medication Refrigerator Temperature Check Policy stated that all medication refrigerators were to be checked daily to ensure they remained within the proper temperature range. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 78 residents in the facility and was investigated under Complaint Number 2786595. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were identified in the report; the deficiency related broadly to the management and monitoring of medication refrigerator temperatures for all residents whose medications were stored in these units.
Failure to Ensure Integrity and Accurate Documentation of Controlled Substance Destruction
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the integrity and security of controlled substances and did not maintain accurate narcotic destruction records as required. Specifically, an LPN forged another nurse's initials on a controlled drug record when wasting a dose of oxycodone with acetaminophen for a resident. The incident occurred when the LPN wasted the medication and, instead of having another nurse physically witness and sign the destruction as required by policy, entered the other nurse's initials at the latter's verbal request. This action resulted in inaccurate documentation of the controlled substance destruction process. The resident involved had multiple complex medical conditions, including a recent hip fracture, joint replacement, malignancies, diabetes with neuropathy, and impaired cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for mobility and had frequent incontinence. The medication in question was prescribed for pain management and was discontinued later in the month. The facility's policy required that the destruction of controlled substances be witnessed and properly documented, including signatures of both the nurse performing the destruction and the witness, which did not occur in this instance.
Failure to Maintain Safe Environment and Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified in the facility's failure to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. The report notes that the environment did not meet safety standards, and supervision was insufficient to prevent potential incidents. Specific actions or omissions by staff or management that led to the deficiency are not detailed in the report, nor are any particular residents or their medical histories mentioned.
Inadequate Pain Management for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pain management for two residents, resulting in actual harm. Resident #273 was admitted with a history of chronic pain and an active order for Norco, an opioid pain medication, from a previous facility. However, upon admission, the facility did not continue the Norco order, and the resident was not evaluated by a physician in a timely manner. As a result, the resident experienced severe, constant pain that limited his functional abilities and participation in therapy. Despite expressing pain and refusing Tylenol, which was ineffective, the resident did not receive appropriate pain management until several days later when Tramadol was prescribed. Resident #66, who had a history of hemiplegia and other conditions following a cerebral infarction, also experienced inadequate pain management. The resident's care plan included interventions for pain, but there were multiple instances where pain assessments were not conducted, and pain medication was not administered as needed. The resident's pain was documented during therapy sessions, where it was noted to limit functional activities, yet the facility failed to consistently address and manage the pain effectively. Observations revealed the resident exhibited signs of pain during transfers and therapy, but these were not adequately documented or addressed by the nursing staff. The facility's failure to implement a comprehensive and individualized pain management program for these residents was evident in the lack of timely physician evaluation, inadequate pain assessments, and inconsistent administration of pain medication. The facility's pain policy, which required assessments and interventions for identified pain, was not followed, leading to prolonged discomfort and limited functional abilities for the affected residents.
Failure to Follow Planned Menu for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow the planned menu for dinner on February 25, 2025, affecting all residents on a regular texture and mechanical soft diet. The menu was supposed to include cheese tortellini with marinara sauce, steamed Brussel sprouts, a slice of bread with margarine, and a piece of chocolate cream cake. However, observations revealed that no bread or margarine was provided to these residents, except for one resident who had a special preference for bread and margarine. This oversight was confirmed by the Food and Nutrition Services Manager, who admitted to missing the inclusion of bread and margarine on the menu. Interviews with several residents, including those with various medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dysphagia, and others, indicated that they would have liked to receive bread with their meal. These residents were on specific diets, such as No Concentrated Sweets (NCS) and No Added Salt (NAS), and were at nutritional risk due to their medical conditions. The facility's policy required that menus be planned and choices offered, but this was not adhered to, leading to the deficiency noted in the report.
Failure to Provide Evening Snacks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were offered a substantial evening snack when the time between dinner and breakfast exceeded 14 hours. This deficiency was identified through observations, record reviews, and interviews. The facility's Fall and Winter menu for 2024 to 2025 did not list an evening snack, and the time span between the last dinner tray and the first breakfast tray was approximately 15 hours. Interviews with several residents revealed that they were not offered snacks in the evening, and some residents expressed that they were hungry and would have liked to receive snacks. A Certified Nursing Assistant confirmed that only residents with labeled snacks received them, and there was no routine offering of snacks to other residents. The Food and Nutrition Services Manager (FNSM) confirmed that the time between dinner and breakfast was greater than 14 hours and that only labeled snacks were provided to select residents. The resident council meeting minutes did not document any agreement from residents to have a meal span greater than 14 hours. Observations of snack deliveries showed that only labeled snacks were provided, with no extra snacks available for other residents. The facility's document on meal times indicated a scheduled time span of 14 hours and 45 minutes between dinner and breakfast, which was not adhered to.
Unsanitary Conditions of Feeding and IV Poles
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary conditions for tube feeding and intravenous (IV) poles, affecting five residents. Observations revealed that the poles used for tube feeding and IV therapy were covered with dried tube feed or debris. This was confirmed by staff members, including a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a Social Services Designee (SSD), who were unsure of the cleaning responsibilities for these poles. Resident #13, who required enteral feeding due to conditions such as gastrostomy and dysphasia, was observed with a tube feeding pole that had a large amount of dried tube feed on its base. Similarly, Resident #43, who also required enteral feeding, had a pole with dried tube feed on both the pole and its base. The SSD confirmed the observation and mentioned that an outside company was responsible for cleaning the equipment. Resident #57, who was receiving IV therapy for an acute infection, had an IV pole with dried debris. Resident #226, who was at risk for nutritional issues and received supplemental tube feedings, had a tube feed pole with dried feed on it. Lastly, Resident #52, who had multiple diagnoses including diabetes and dementia, had a pole with dried tube feed and rust, which required significant cleaning effort by a housekeeper. The lack of clarity regarding cleaning responsibilities contributed to the unsanitary conditions observed.
Failure to Provide Alternative Vegetable for Residents Disliking Brussel Sprouts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a nutritionally equivalent alternative for residents who disliked Brussel sprouts during a dinner service. This deficiency affected nine residents who had expressed a dislike for Brussel sprouts. On the specified dinner menu, residents were supposed to receive cheese tortellini with marinara sauce, steamed Brussel sprouts, bread with margarine, and chocolate cream cake. However, for those who disliked Brussel sprouts, no alternative vegetable was provided, leaving them without a vegetable portion for their meal. Observations during the dinner service confirmed that Brussel sprouts were the only vegetable option available, and no substitutes were prepared for those who had Brussel sprouts listed as a dislike. Interviews with several residents revealed dissatisfaction with the meal, as they did not receive a vegetable and felt hungry afterward. The facility's menu cycle did not list alternative vegetables, and the facility's policy indicated that choices should be offered, but this was not adhered to in practice.
Failure to Notify Family of Resident's Skin Tear
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the representative of a resident with Alzheimer's, dementia, and muscle weakness about a new skin impairment. The resident, who had self-care deficits and impaired cognition, experienced a skin tear on her right wrist during a transfer to the toilet. This incident occurred when the resident had difficulty standing and fell back into her wheelchair, resulting in a skin tear that was treated with normal saline and a foam dressing. However, the progress note documenting the incident did not include any notification to the resident's family. An observation revealed the resident in a wheelchair with a foam bandage on her right wrist, and an interview with the resident showed she was confused and unaware of how the injury occurred. The LPN involved in the incident confirmed that she did not recall notifying the resident's daughter about the skin tear, and a review of the progress notes confirmed the lack of documentation regarding family notification. A telephone interview with the resident's daughter further confirmed that she was unaware of the injury, highlighting the facility's failure to communicate significant changes in the resident's condition to her family.
Failure to Implement Grooming Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement care-planned interventions for grooming for two residents, Resident #52 and Resident #66, who were unable to perform activities of daily living independently. Resident #66, who was admitted with conditions including hemiplegia, aphasia, and vascular dementia, had a care plan that required assistance with grooming and hygiene. Despite being cognitively intact and dependent on staff for personal care, there was no documented evidence that staff attempted to trim Resident #66's fingernails or encouraged him to allow nail care, even though his nails were observed to be long, yellow, and dirty. The facility did not document any refusal of care by Resident #66 during the assessment period, and there was no evidence that the physician or responsible party was notified of the refusal. Resident #52, admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and dementia, also had a care plan indicating a self-care deficit and required substantial assistance with personal hygiene. Observations revealed that Resident #52 had long, dirty fingernails, with some nails being too thick to cut. Although Resident #52 nodded in agreement when asked if his nails could be trimmed, there was no evidence that the facility ensured regular nail care was provided. The facility's failure to maintain the residents' grooming and hygiene as per their care plans was evident in the observations and interviews conducted. The deficiency in providing adequate grooming care for these residents highlights a lapse in the facility's adherence to care plans and documentation practices. The lack of documented attempts to provide nail care or notify relevant parties of refusals indicates a failure to ensure the residents' dignity and hygiene needs were met. This affected the quality of care provided to the residents, as evidenced by the observations of their unkempt fingernails and the lack of follow-through on care-planned interventions.
Failure to Administer Treatments and Document Vital Signs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer treatments according to physician orders for two residents. Resident #40, who has chronic heart failure, hypertension, and muscle weakness, was ordered to wear Tubi grips on her lower extremities while out of bed. However, she reported not receiving these compression stockings for about a week, and observations confirmed she was not wearing them, resulting in swollen legs. The issue was traced back to incorrect documentation in the computer system, which did not indicate the need for daily application of the Tubi grips. Resident #57, diagnosed with respiratory failure, COPD, and hypertension, experienced a change in condition with unstable vital signs and confusion, leading to hospitalization. However, there was no documentation of the resident's vital signs on the day of the incident. The LPN involved could not recall the specific abnormal vital signs and admitted to not recording them in the electronic medical records. Resident #58, with chronic kidney disease, CHF, and atherosclerotic heart disease, had physician orders for Furosemide and Lasix to manage fluid overload. Despite significant weight increases on several occasions, indicating the need for an additional dose of Lasix, the medication was not administered. The LPN responsible for inputting the resident's weight did not realize the order required administering Lasix for weight gains over two pounds in 24 hours, resulting in missed doses.
Failure to Implement Timely Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that fall prevention interventions were in place as ordered for a resident, identified as Resident #56, in a timely manner. Resident #56 had a history of falls and was at moderate risk for falls due to multiple medical conditions, including hemiplegia, hypotension, and a history of falling. The resident's care plan included interventions such as bed and chair alarms, a low bed, and a floor mat to prevent falls. Despite these measures, the resident experienced multiple falls, including incidents on January 11, February 17, and February 24, where the resident was found on the floor after falling out of bed. Following the falls, the facility's clinical team reviewed each incident and identified new interventions to prevent further falls. After the fall on February 24, a perimeter mattress was ordered to provide additional safety for the resident. However, observations on February 26 and 27 revealed that the perimeter mattress had not been placed on the resident's bed, despite being delivered to the facility. Instead, the mattress was found in a plastic bag leaning against a chair in the resident's room. Interviews with facility staff, including a Registered Nurse and a Licensed Practical Nurse, confirmed that the perimeter mattress had not been installed on the resident's bed. The LPN acknowledged that the mattress should have been put in place immediately after delivery but was not prioritized. This inaction contributed to the facility's failure to implement timely fall prevention interventions as ordered, resulting in a deficiency in ensuring a safe environment for the resident.
Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident who was admitted with a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident was on a scheduled toileting program with specific times outlined for toileting, but staff interviews and observations revealed that the schedule was not consistently followed. The resident expressed that she was unaware of the scheduled toileting program and reported that staff provided incontinence care only when she requested it. Observations confirmed that the resident was not toileted or checked according to the schedule, and incontinence care was often provided while the resident was in bed rather than being taken to the bathroom. Interviews with staff, including CNAs and a COTA, indicated a lack of adherence to the scheduled toileting program. The CNAs admitted to not following the toileting schedule and instead provided care based on the resident's requests. The COTA mentioned that therapy was aware of the toileting program but was not working on it specifically. The LPN confirmed that the toileting schedule was marked as complete in the resident's records, but the actual practice did not align with the documented schedule. This inconsistency in following the toileting program led to the deficiency in providing appropriate incontinence care for the resident.
Failure to Monitor and Document Fluid Restrictions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately and consistently monitor and record physician-ordered fluid restrictions for two residents, leading to a deficiency in maintaining their nutritional health. Resident #58, who had chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure, was on a 2,000 ml fluid restriction. However, the facility did not document the actual fluid amounts offered and consumed from the nursing portion of the restriction. Interviews with staff revealed that while they were aware of the fluid restriction, there was no documentation on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to track the nursing-provided fluids, making it impossible to determine adherence to the restriction. Similarly, Resident #29, who had heart failure and was on a fluid restriction, did not have accurate documentation of fluid intake. The MAR only had check marks indicating the nurse had signed off each shift without recording the actual fluid amounts consumed. Interviews revealed that the resident was not aware of the fluid restriction, and the nursing staff did not have a system to document the fluids provided during each shift. This lack of documentation prevented effective monitoring of the fluid restriction. The facility's policy on fluid restriction required the total fluid amount to be divided between nursing and dietary, with the nursing allotment documented on the MAR. However, the failure to document the nursing-provided fluids for both residents resulted in a deficiency in monitoring and adhering to the prescribed fluid restrictions, compromising the residents' nutritional management.
Failure in Communication with Dialysis Center
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper communication between the long-term care facility and the dialysis center for a resident who required dialysis services. The resident, who was the only one receiving dialysis at the facility, had multiple diagnoses including end-stage renal disease and diabetes mellitus. The care plan for the resident included monitoring for complications from dialysis and ensuring communication with the dialysis center. However, the facility did not consistently receive communication sheets from the dialysis center after each treatment, which was a requirement as per the compliance agreement between the facility and the dialysis center. Interviews with staff revealed that when communication sheets were not sent back with the resident, staff would call the dialysis center to obtain the necessary information, but this was not always documented in the resident's medical record. The medical records showed missing communication sheets for numerous dialysis sessions over a period of nearly three months. The facility's administrator confirmed that the normal procedure was to receive communication from the dialysis center, and if not received, to contact the center to obtain it. Despite this procedure, there was no documentation in the progress notes indicating that the facility had reached out to the dialysis center when communication sheets were missing.
Inaccurate Infection Control Logs and Isolation Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate infection control logs and appropriate isolation precautions for a resident diagnosed with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The resident, who had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene, was receiving intravenous (IV) therapy for an acute infection. Despite physician orders for Vancomycin and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to a central line IV catheter, observations revealed no signs indicating isolation precautions at the entrance of the resident's room. Additionally, the infection control logs inaccurately recorded the resident's condition as osteomyelitis instead of MRSA. Interviews with staff, including a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and the Director of Nursing (DON)/infection preventionist, confirmed the oversight. The LPN was unaware of any isolation precautions for the resident, and the DON acknowledged the inaccuracy in the infection control log. The facility's policy required contact isolation precautions for residents with MRSA, which were not implemented, leading to a deficiency in infection prevention and control measures.
Latest citations in Ohio
Surveyors found that multiple hazardous storage areas, including a closet near medical records, a beauty salon used to store chemical cases, a supply room in one nursing station, a room leading to a smoking area, a housekeeping room near therapy, and a lobby storage room, lacked required self-closing or automatic-closing doors. These conditions did not comply with NFPA 101 requirements for hazardous area enclosure and had the potential to affect all residents and staff in an emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility did not conduct fire drills on every shift each quarter and did not vary drill conditions as required by NFPA 101. Record review showed that one shift lacked a documented drill for an entire quarter, and the pattern of drill times and dates did not demonstrate varied conditions. The Maintenance Director confirmed the incomplete and noncompliant fire drill schedule, which affected all residents and staff emergency preparedness.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain clear egress corridors as required by NFPA 101, with a TV/video cart plugged into a corridor outlet and multiple unsecured chairs placed in the hallway near resident rooms and the secured unit dining room, including directly in front of a fire extinguisher. These items projected about 29 inches into an approximately eight-foot-wide corridor and were located in front of the handrail, potentially affecting 28 residents and staff’s ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director confirmed these corridor obstructions during the survey.
A resident with intact cognition receiving Medicare Part A skilled services for metabolic encephalopathy had services discontinued while benefit days remained, but the facility did not issue the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN). The Social Services Director later confirmed that no SNF ABN was provided and reported she believed only a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was needed when all skilled services were stopped. This practice conflicted with the facility’s written policy, which required SNF ABNs to be issued when extended care items or services were initiated, reduced, or terminated due to expected non-coverage by Medicare.
Surveyors identified that the facility exceeded the acceptable medication error rate when two residents with type 2 DM received insulin doses that were not administered according to orders or manufacturer instructions. In two separate observations, an LPN administered Novolog and another LPN administered insulin glargine and insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens, and the insulin lispro and Novolog were given after the residents had already consumed a significant portion of their breakfast meals, despite orders for administration before meals. Manufacturer information for both insulin products required priming before each injection to ensure accurate dosing, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and specified time frames.
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete crash cart audits for multiple full-code residents. Surveyors, accompanied by the DON, found that daily crash cart checks did not include verification of supply expiration dates, and that an extension cord documented as present on several audit dates was not actually in the cart. Audit logs also conflicted with the cart’s contents by indicating that required items such as eye protection, saline, and clear plastic were present when they were not. These findings were inconsistent with the facility’s policy requiring the crash cart to be checked every 24 hours and after each use, with prompt replacement of equipment and supplies.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure on supplemental O2, COPD, and cognitive risk factors was repeatedly documented as non-compliant with the smoking policy, including going out to smoke outside designated times and retaining cigarettes and lighters provided by family. Despite prior assessments identifying this resident as unsafe to smoke without supervision, a later assessment classified the resident as safe to smoke independently without documented rationale or care plan update. The resident subsequently went outside alone with an O2 nasal cannula in place, lit a cigarette, and sustained facial burns when the cannula ignited, as observed by staff and confirmed by EMS and ED records. In a separate case, another cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls had a care-planned intervention for non-skid strips in front of a recliner, but observation and staff confirmation showed the strips were not present, despite remaining on the active fall-risk care plan.
Multiple dependent residents did not receive scheduled showers, bed baths, or shaving as outlined in their care plans and the facility’s routine care policy. One resident recovering from spinal surgery missed numerous scheduled showers over several months. Another resident who relied on staff for self-care repeatedly requested shaving but was not shaved, and visible facial hair was observed after a recent shower. A resident with chronic respiratory failure and a tracheostomy, requiring substantial/maximal assist with personal hygiene, had no documented showers for an extended period and was observed with long facial hair, which staff acknowledged should be removed during bathing or as needed. A cognitively impaired resident with ESRD and CHF, scheduled for twice-weekly showers, had multiple undocumented or missed showers and reported not getting showers despite asking aides who said they lacked time. Another cognitively intact resident with hemiplegia and multiple comorbidities, also scheduled for twice-weekly showers, had several dates where documentation showed no shower/bath/bed bath provided or no entry at all, and she reported feeling unclean and unimportant when her showers were missed.
A resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for urinary retention, and care plan interventions requiring the drainage bag to be properly secured with a dignity cover, was observed seated in a chair with the catheter drainage bag uncovered and containing visible dark yellow urine that could be seen from the hallway. Later, an LPN confirmed the catheter bag was lying directly on the floor without a dignity cover. This situation occurred despite facility policy requiring care to be provided in a manner that respects and enhances each resident’s dignity and personal privacy.
A cognitively intact resident with chronic orthopedic pain had a PRN oxycodone order, but multiple doses were signed out on the narcotic log by an RN without corresponding entries on the MAR or documented pain assessments. A CNA/med tech reported frequent problems with this RN’s narcotic counts and documentation, describing erratic behavior when handling narcotic keys. The resident reported taking oxycodone only once or twice daily and otherwise using Tylenol, which conflicted with the number of oxycodone doses signed out. The facility’s investigation found it was inconclusive whether narcotics were misappropriated or whether there was a failure of documentation, but confirmed there was no evidence that all signed-out doses were administered.
Failure to Maintain Self-Closing Doors for Multiple Hazardous Storage Areas
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to hazardous area protection and door requirements under NFPA 101, 2012 Edition. During facility tours, they observed that multiple hazardous storage areas did not have self-closing or automatic-closing doors as required for hazardous areas such as combustible storage and chemical storage. These areas included a closet next to medical records, a beauty salon being used to store cases of chemicals, a supply room in Station #2, and the room leading to the smoking area in Station #3. On a subsequent tour, surveyors observed additional hazardous areas without self-closing doors. The housekeeping room across from therapy and the lobby storage room were both noted to lack self-closing door mechanisms. The facility census at the time was 59 residents, and the surveyors stated that this deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff's ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director verified these findings at the time they were observed.
Plan Of Correction
K 0321 This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be admissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 06/12/2026 K-0321 Doors with Self-Closing Devices Corrective action for resident/s: 1. The closet door next to medical records was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing device to closet door next to medical records on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. The beauty salon had chemicals stored in it on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director moved chemicals from beauty salon on 05/20/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. The supply room on station 2 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing door to supply room on station 2 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The room to the smoking area on station 3 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the smoking are on station 3 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The housekeeping room across from therapy was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the housekeeping room across from therapy gym on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 5. The lobby storage room was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the lobby storage room on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: LNHA and Maintenance director/designee completed a full facility audit for doors with self-closing devices on 05/26/2026. Any corrective action, including, doors identified as needing self-closures will be added on or before 06/09/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 sections 19.3.2.1 and 19.3.5.9 specifically regarding doors with self-closing devices. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Doors with Self-Closing device audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 06/12/2026
Failure to Conduct Required Quarterly Fire Drills on All Shifts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct fire drills in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.7.1 through 19.7.1.8, specifically by not holding drills every shift each quarter and not varying drill conditions as required. Record review on 06/09/25 at approximately 10:32 A.M. showed there was no fire drill conducted for the first shift during the third quarter. The documented first-shift fire drills occurred on 01/30/26 at 2:42 P.M., 04/30/26 at 1:51 P.M., and 10/31/25 at 10:58 A.M., indicating a missed quarter. Second-shift fire drills were recorded on 02/26/26 at 5:20 P.M., 06/03/25 at 4:35 P.M., 08/29/25 at 3:46 P.M., and 11/25/25 at 5:09 P.M., and third-shift drills on 02/28/26 at 11:47 P.M., 05/30/25 at 12:18 A.M., 07/22/25 at 11:34 P.M., 09/26/25 at 11:40 P.M., and 12/15/25 at 5:17 A.M. The surveyor determined that drills were not conducted under varied conditions and that the required quarterly drill on each shift was not consistently performed. The Maintenance Director confirmed these findings at the time they were identified, and the deficiency had the potential to affect all 59 residents and staff response in an emergency. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were described in the report; the deficiency related to facility-wide emergency preparedness practices and documentation of fire drills.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0712 Fire Drills Corrective action for resident/s: There were no records of a fire drill for the first shift of the third quarter of 2025. First shift fire drill completed on 5/24/2026 by maintenance director/designee with no findings or corrective action necessary. Identification of other residents who may be affected: On 5/26/2026 Maintenance director/designee completed 100% audit of the scheduled fire drills to ensure a drill is scheduled quarterly each shift with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.7.1.4 through 19.7.1.7. specifically including fire drill frequency requirements. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Fire Drill Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Obstructed Egress Corridors Due to Equipment and Chairs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain required clear egress widths in corridors in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.2.3.4 through 19.2.3.5 and 7.3.2 through 7.3.2.3, creating projections into the egress corridor that exceeded allowable limits. Surveyors observed that on one day in Station #3, a cart with a television and video equipment was plugged into an outlet in the corridor by room 38, and five activity room chairs were placed in the corridor near the secured unit dining room directly in front of a fire extinguisher. On the following day, surveyors again observed chairs in the Station #3 corridor, with four by room 35 and four by the activities room, and the same television cart still in the corridor; the chairs were not secured. The corridor was approximately eight feet wide, and the projections extended approximately 29 inches into the corridor in front of the handrail. These conditions had the potential to affect 28 residents in the facility and the staff’s ability to assist in an emergency, and the Maintenance Director confirmed the observations at the time of discovery. No specific resident medical histories or conditions were described in the report, only that 28 residents were potentially affected and the facility census was 59.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be subsequent remedial measures and should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0232 Clear path of egress Corrective action for resident/s: 1. On 05/18/2026 station 3 had a cart with a television parked in the corridor by room 38 that exceeded allowable limits. Maintenance director/designee moved the TV cart into the activity room, out to the corridor on 05/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. On 5/18/2026 station 3 had 5 chairs in the corridor near the dining room directly in front of the fire extinguisher. Maintenance director/designee moved the chairs into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. On 5/19/2026 station 3 had 4 chairs by the activity room and 4 by room 35. In addition, the TV cart was in the corridor. The maintenance director/designee moved the chairs and TV cart into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/19/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Maintenance director/designee completed a 100% facility audit for clear paths of egress on 5/26/26 with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: Maintenance Director/designee educated staff on 5/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.2.3.4 and 19.2.3.5 specifically including maintaining a clear path of egress. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Path of Egress Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Failure to Issue Required SNF ABN When Discontinuing Medicare Part A Services
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when Medicare Part A services were discontinued for a resident who still had available benefit days. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy and had intact cognition per the Minimum Data Set assessment. The facility’s own SNF Beneficiary Notification Review documented that Medicare Part A skilled services began on 02/11/26 and the last covered day was 03/11/26, and that the facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A services before the resident’s benefit days were exhausted. Despite this, no SNF ABN was provided to the resident or the resident’s representative. During interviews, the Social Services Director stated that the SNF ABN was issued hours prior to the last covered day but, upon reviewing her files, confirmed that no SNF ABN had actually been issued for this resident. She further explained that she believed an SNF ABN was only required if one skilled service remained and that if all skilled services were being discontinued, only the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) needed to be issued. The Administrator, however, stated that a resident should always receive both a SNF ABN and a NOMNC when Medicare Part A services are discontinued and benefit days remain. Review of the facility’s written policy dated 03/28/23 showed that the facility was required to issue SNF ABNs for initiation, reduction, or termination of extended care items or services when Medicare payment was not expected, which did not occur in this case.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 F-0582 Corrective action for resident/s: On 5/14/26 Resident #34 was informed of rights and responsibilities related to Advanced Beneficiary Notice and voiced understanding of information for future reference by administrator. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Any resident receiving skilled services from nursing or therapy services. The Administrator audited all residents who were discharged from skilled services in the past 30 days to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice on 5/29/26. No non-compliance was noted. Measures for systemic change: On 5/14/2026 Business Office Manager, Director of Rehab, Minimum Data Set nurse, Director of Nursing and Social Services Director were educated on proper procedure of issuing of Notice Of Medicare Non Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice by administrator. All upcoming discharges from skilled services will be reviewed weekly at Utilization Review meeting to ensure notices will be delivered timely. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Administrator or designee to complete audits of all residents being discharged from skilled services to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 5/29/26
Insulin Administration Errors and Failure to Prime Insulin Pens
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with surveyors identifying 3 errors out of 28 medication administration opportunities, resulting in a 10.71% error rate. For one resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate cognitive impairment, the physician’s order directed Novolog insulin 10 units via subcutaneous pen-injector to be given before meals. During an observed medication pass, the LPN administered 10 units of Novolog insulin without priming the pen and did so after the resident had already consumed approximately 50% of the breakfast meal. The LPN later confirmed she did not prime the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer instructions for the Novolog FlexPen specified that an air shot (priming) must be performed before each injection to ensure proper dosing. Another resident, also diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and with intact cognition, had orders for insulin glargine 35 units subcutaneously twice daily and insulin lispro 20 units subcutaneously before meals, plus 12 units subcutaneously if blood glucose was between 251 mg/dL and 300 mg/dL. During an observed medication administration, an LPN administered 35 units of insulin glargine and 32 units of insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens and after the resident had consumed approximately 90% of the breakfast meal, despite orders for insulin lispro to be given before meals. The LPN later stated she could not remember if she had primed the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer information for insulin lispro stated that the pen must be primed before each injection to confirm insulin delivery and remove air, and that failure to prime could result in too much or too little insulin. The DON confirmed the expectation that insulin be administered as ordered, including priming each pen with two units before dialing the prescribed dose, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and required time frames.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 5/29/2026. F-0759 Corrective action for resident/s: Residents #21 and #22 were assessed and evaluated by nurse and Director of Nursing 5/14/26. Resident #21 and #22 both denied any adverse effects and none were noted upon assessment by the Director of Nursing on 5/14/2026. Notification made to physician on 5/14/2026. LPN # 2 competency Eval on insulin administration with the Director of Nursing completed 5/14/2026. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Diabetic residents on assignment of LPN #2/station 2 have the potential to be affected and were assessed by the DON/Designee on 5/14/26 and found to be within normal limits. Measures for systemic change: All Nurses were educated by the Director of Nursing on the steps for Insulin administration per competency, diabetes clinical protocol policy, Medication and treatment orders policy, administering medications policy, and Obtaining fingerstick Glucose Level policy On 5/14/2026. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing will complete insulin administration audits on 5 nurses. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance: 5/29/2026
Inaccurate Crash Cart Audits and Missing Emergency Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate and complete crash cart audits for residents requiring basic life support, affecting eighteen of thirty-five residents who were designated as full code. During an observation of the crash cart with the DON, surveyors found that the daily audit documentation for the month did not include verification of expiration dates for crash cart supplies. Review of the crash cart audit logs showed that an extension cord was documented as being in the cart on multiple dates, but the extension cord was not present in the cart at the time of inspection. Additionally, the audit documentation indicated that required items, including eye protection, saline, and clear plastic, were not present in the crash cart, yet they were documented as being in the cart. The facility’s undated “Emergency Crash Cart” policy stated that the crash cart is to be checked every 24 hours and after every use, and that equipment and supplies are to be noted and replaced promptly, but the observed documentation and contents of the cart did not match these requirements. This deficiency was verified with the DON at the time of the survey and was cited under the requirement that personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to residents requiring emergency care, subject to physician orders and advance directives, and was investigated under Complaint Number 2687380.
Plan Of Correction
Cridersville Care Center Provider Number:366171 Survey Type: Complaint Survey Survey Date: 04/29/26 This Plan of Correction (PoC) outlines the actions completed by the facility with regards to the deficiency citation. This Plan of correction does not constitute any admission of guilt or liability by the facility and is submitted only in response to the regulatory requirements. Please accept the following as the facility's credible allegation of compliance as of 4/30/26. F678 CPR All Full Code residents #18 have the potential to be affected by the alleged deficiency. On 4/27/26 the DON/ADON re-stocked the crash cart per the inventory sheet for all missing items. Crash cart inventory sheet updated and new one will go into effect on 5/1/26. All licensed nursing staff provided with training related to crash cart inventory being a daily audit review using inventory sheet on 4/27/26 per DON/designee. The DON/designee will conduct clinical rounds and conduct a random audit of crash cart three times per week for 4 (four) weeks to ensure compliance. The results of the audit will be documented. The facility conducted an Ad-Hoc QAPI meeting on 4/27/26 and discussed the alleged deficiency and corrective actions. Date when corrective action will be completed: 4/30/26
Unsafe Smoking Practices with Oxygen and Missed Fall-Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide a safe smoking environment, adequate supervision, and appropriate implementation of its smoking policy for a resident who used oxygen and smoked, as well as failure to implement fall-prevention interventions as care planned for another resident. One resident had multiple relevant diagnoses, including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, COPD, end-stage renal disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, diabetes, and necrotizing fasciitis. Her care plans identified impaired visual function, risk for respiratory complications related to a history of smoking, and risk for cognitive decline, with interventions including use of oxygen per order and observation for understanding. A smoking-related care plan created earlier documented that she wished to use smoking products, had been assessed as safe to smoke "with supervision," and was non-compliant with the smoking policy, with family continuing to provide smoking supplies despite education and a verbal warning for non-compliance. Smoking assessments and progress notes showed a pattern of non-compliance and inconsistent classification of this resident’s smoking safety. Multiple smoking observation/assessments completed earlier in March documented that she had no cognitive loss, visual deficits, or dexterity problems but was unsafe to smoke without supervision because she did not return smoking materials and did not follow designated smoke times. Progress notes described her going out to smoke multiple times by herself or with family, including sneaking out next door with a cigarette and going out multiple times in one evening, with staff documenting that she was "reeducated" and that family brought in cigarettes and lighters which she did not return to staff. Despite this history, a smoking assessment completed after a three-day hospital stay assessed her as safe to smoke without supervision, with no documentation explaining how this conclusion was reached or evidence that her care plan was updated accordingly. On the day of the incident, the resident reported she had cigarettes and a lighter on her person after returning from dialysis and stated she "could not find a nurse" and went outside to smoke, saying she "guessed" she forgot she had her oxygen on. A CNA observed her outside and saw a flame coming through the resident’s oxygen nasal cannula tubing, turned off the oxygen tank, removed the tubing, and patted out sparks on the resident’s shirt sleeve. The resident’s face and hands appeared black in color, and EMS documented first-degree burns to the head and face, with the resident stating she lit a cigarette with her nasal cannula on, causing the burn. The hospital record described her face as black from smoke and her lips and mouth as "burnt and charred," with a recommendation for intubation that she refused. The facility’s incident report recorded that she went outside with oxygen on to smoke without notifying staff, that staff witnessed the occurrence as she walked through the dining room door to the courtyard, and that she stated she thought she had turned her oxygen off. The facility’s smoking policy required interdisciplinary evaluation to determine safe versus unsafe smokers, staff maintenance of all smoking paraphernalia for both safe and unsafe smokers, and progressive consequences for policy violations. A separate deficiency involved another resident at risk for falls whose care plan included use of non-skid strips on the floor in front of her recliner as a fall-prevention intervention. This resident had severe cognitive impairment, used a walker and wheelchair, required supervision or touching assistance for transfers and ambulation, and had experienced two or more falls without injury since the prior assessment. The fall-risk care plan, initiated at admission, specified non-skid strips in front of the recliner beginning in November. However, nursing staff interviewed were not familiar with all of the resident’s fall-prevention interventions without checking the record, and observation of the room showed two recliners with no non-skid strips on the floor in front of them. An LPN confirmed that the non-skid strips were not present despite the intervention remaining active in the care plan, and moving the recliners did not reveal any strips. The facility’s fall management policy required identification of hazards and risk factors, implementation of interventions to minimize falls and injuries, and development and implementation of a care plan based on interdisciplinary evaluation, with interventions related to identified risk factors.
Plan Of Correction
Smoking: On 03/21/26 at 3:16 P.M. 911 response was activated for Resident #11 and Medical Director #601 was notified by Registered Nurse (RN) #322. On 03/21/26 at 3:18 P.M. on-call Nurse/Social Services #423 immediately notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) #304 of the incident involving Resident #11. On 03/21/26 at 3:22 P.M. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived onsite. At 3:30 P.M. Resident #11 was transported to the emergency room. On 03/21/26 at 3:30 P.M. RN #322 completed a smoking re-assessment of Resident #11 assessing the resident to be an unsafe smoker requiring supervision due to failure to remove oxygen prior to entering designated smoking area. On 03/21/26 from 3:38 P.M. through 7:57 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #337, #336, #335, #338; RN #334, and DON #304 re-assessed residents (who smoke). This included Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, and Resident #10 to determine smoking safety (via smoking assessment). Each resident was re-educated regarding the facility smoking policy and staff verified there were no smoking materials on their person. The residents' smoking materials would be maintained by facility staff and distributed per policy. On 03/21/26 at 4:30 P.M. DON #304 responded to facility and an Ad Hoc (not scheduled) Quality Assurance (QA) meeting was held via telephone with the Administrator, DON #304 and Medical Director #601 to review investigative findings and plan of action. A root cause analysis was completed and determined Resident #11 had smoking materials on her person (believed to be obtained from family without staff knowledge) and failed to remove her oxygen. The QA team discussed a corrective action plan. On 03/21/26 from 5:00 P.M through 03/22/26 at 3:00 P.M. 26 RNs, 13 LPNs, one medical technician (MT), 54 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) four activities staff, one central supply staff, 11 dietary staff, 12 housekeeping staff, three laundry staff, one medical records staff, two social designees, two maintenance staff, nine administrative staff, and 19 therapy staff (158 staff at the time of the incident) were provided education regarding the facility smoking policy by DON #304 and the Administrator. This was completed via 1:1, small group in-services or via phone. Newly hired staff would receive education during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy. On 03/21/26 at 5:00 P.M. DON #304 completed an audit of all residents who smoke (Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, and Resident #10) to verify smoking evaluations and plans of care accurately reflected the residents' smoking safety needs. The residents were educated on the facility smoking policy, and smoking materials were to be maintained at the nurses' station. An audit was completed which included verification of required safety measures present in designated smoking areas, including an ash can, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, ash trays and no oxygen signs. There were no identified concerns or changes made because of the audits. On 03/21/26 at 8:55 P.M. Resident #11 returned from the ED. LPN #332 verbally educated the resident regarding the facility smoking policy which included the need for supervision, a smoking apron (to be worn) and the facility smoke times. LPN #332 verified no smoking materials were on the resident's person or in her room at this time. On 03/23/26 at 11:00 A.M. the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) (Administrator, DON #304, Medical Director #601, RN #302, Social Services #427, Social Services #423, DON #300, and Maintenance #436) met in-person to review the plan of action with DON #304/designee to complete weekly monitoring of residents who smoke and designated smoking areas weekly for four weeks with Housekeeping responsible to complete the cleaning. Housekeeping staff were responsible for cleaning ashtrays and the designated smoking area daily. Audits to be reviewed and any further actions required to be directed by the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee during scheduled meetings. The IDT also reviewed all current smoking assessments and care plans for residents who smoke. Resident #50 required a change in supervision levels with smoking due to cognition levels and her plan of care as well as Resident #11's plan of care was updated to reflect supervision/safety. On 03/23/26 from 3:45 P.M. to 8:55 P.M. Social Services #423 re-educated residents who smoke (Resident #22, Resident #3, Resident #47, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #150, Resident #86, Resident #10) and responsible parties, if applicable regarding the facility smoking policy and supervision levels. On 03/23/26 at12:13 P.M. Social Services #427 contacted Resident #11's family member (#602) to schedule a care conference. Family member #602 and Family Member #603 were not available to meet until 03/27/26. On 03/23/26 at 1:00 P.M. staff education related to smoking areas, removal of oxygen prior to entering smoking area and maintaining smoking materials at the nurses' station for residents who smoke was initiated by DON #304 and the Administrator via 1:1, small group in-services or via phone call. Education was completed for all 158 staff by 03/24/26 at 1:00 P.M. Newly hired staff would be educated during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy. The facility does not utilize agency staff. On 03/27/26 at 11:00 A.M. a care conference was held with Resident #11 and Family Members #602 and #603, the Administrator, Social Services #423 and Social Services #427. The facility smoking policy was reviewed. The resident and family were informed an involuntary discharge would be initiated should the resident exhibit non-compliance moving forward and supervision would be increased beyond the two-hour standard of care to monitor more closely for non-compliance with the facility smoking policy. Family Member #602 stated he educated his siblings as well. On 04/10/26 at 2:00 P.M. DON #304 initiated education with 26 RNs and 13 LPNs (100% of nurses educated) regarding completion of the smoking evaluation via 1:1, small group in-services, or phone. The education was completed by 6:00 P.M. on 04/10/26. A new resident who smokes must remain supervised until the interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviews and determines smoking safety, at which time the care plan is developed and resident and family education is provided. The communication through the staff would be the care plan. Newly hired staff receive education during general orientation regarding the facility's smoking policy and completion of smoking evaluation via Point Click Care (PCC). On 04/10/26 at 4:29 P.M. DON #304 initiated an order in PCC for the nurse to verify, each shift, that Resident #11's smoking materials were maintained at the nurses' station. On 04/13/26 at 5:30 P.M. DON #304 initiated orders in PCC for nurses to verify, each shift, that all residents who smoke would have smoking materials maintained at the nurses' station. An updated list of smokers included: Resident #60, Resident #50, Resident #11, Resident #86, Resident #113, and Resident #151. On 04/13/26 at 5:45 P.M. DON #304 initiated questionnaires for staff regarding the smoking policy with re-education provided as needed via 1:1 and small group in-services for staff currently in the facility with all staff to be questioned/educated prior to working their next scheduled shift. Falls: On 4/9/26, Maintenance Director placed non-skid strips on the floor in front of Resident #12's recliner. Like Residents are identified as residents who have had a fall within the facility. Utilizing the Fall Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, an audit of falls and appropriate interventions for the past 30 days will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure fall interventions are in place per plan of care. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or F 0689 before 5/13/26. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses and STNA/CNAs on the Fall Management Policy to include fall interventions to be in place per the care plan. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. Utilizing the Fall Management Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of new admissions, new readmissions and residents who experience a fall within the last 7 days, weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure fall safety interventions are in place per plan of care. Current fall interventions found to not be in place will be corrected with all intervention in place per plan of care. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Removal Plan
- Activated 911 response for Resident #11 and notified the Medical Director.
- On-call Nurse/Social Services immediately notified the Administrator and DON of the incident.
- EMS arrived onsite and Resident #11 was transported to the emergency room.
- Completed a smoking re-assessment of Resident #11, determining the resident was an unsafe smoker requiring supervision due to failure to remove oxygen prior to entering the designated smoking area.
- Re-assessed all residents who smoke (Residents #22, #3, #47, #50, #60, #150, #86, and #10) to determine smoking safety via smoking assessment.
- Re-educated residents who smoke regarding the facility smoking policy and verified there were no smoking materials on their person.
- Implemented that smoking materials would be maintained by facility staff and distributed per policy.
- Held an ad hoc QA meeting to review investigative findings and plan of action.
- Completed a root cause analysis determining Resident #11 had smoking materials on her person and failed to remove oxygen.
- Developed a corrective action plan.
- Provided facility-wide education to staff on the facility smoking policy.
- Implemented that newly hired staff would receive smoking policy education during orientation.
- Completed an audit of all residents who smoke to verify smoking evaluations and plans of care accurately reflected smoking safety needs.
- Ensured smoking materials were maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Audited designated smoking areas for required safety measures (ash can, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, ash trays, and no-oxygen signs).
- Provided verbal education to Resident #11 on smoking policy (supervision, smoking apron, smoke times).
- Verified no smoking materials were on Resident #11’s person or in her room.
- Conducted an in-person IDT meeting to implement weekly monitoring of residents who smoke and designated smoking areas weekly for four weeks.
- Assigned housekeeping to clean ashtrays and the designated smoking area daily.
- Directed audits to be reviewed by QAPI.
- Reviewed all current smoking assessments and care plans for residents who smoke.
- Updated Resident #50’s supervision level.
- Updated Resident #11’s plan of care to reflect supervision/safety.
- Re-educated residents who smoke and responsible parties (as applicable) regarding the facility smoking policy and supervision levels.
- Contacted Resident #11’s family to schedule a care conference.
- Initiated additional staff education regarding smoking areas, removal of oxygen prior to entering smoking area, and maintaining smoking materials at the nurses’ station.
- Held a care conference with Resident #11 and family to review smoking policy.
- Informed resident/family that involuntary discharge would be initiated for future non-compliance.
- Increased supervision beyond the two-hour standard of care to monitor more closely for non-compliance.
- Provided education to all nurses regarding completion of the smoking evaluation.
- Implemented that new residents who smoke must remain supervised until IDT review determines smoking safety and care plan/education are completed.
- Entered an order in PCC for nursing to verify each shift that Resident #11’s smoking materials were maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Entered orders in PCC for nursing to verify each shift that all residents who smoke have smoking materials maintained at the nurses’ station.
- Initiated staff questionnaires regarding the smoking policy with re-education as needed.
- Required all staff to be questioned/educated prior to working their next scheduled shift.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Shaving Assistance for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide scheduled and needed bathing and shaving assistance to multiple dependent residents in accordance with their care plans, preferences, and the facility’s routine care policy. One resident with spinal stenosis and recent L2–L5 decompression fixation fusion was care planned for substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bath and toileting hygiene and was scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Fridays. Electronic documentation from early January through early April showed this resident did not receive a shower or bed bath on 11 identified scheduled days, and the DON confirmed these missed bathing events. Another resident with dysphagia and developmental issues, who required assistance with self-care and mobility, reported that she asked staff to shave her but they did not, which bothered her. During an observation following a recent shower, she stated she had not been shaved and that the hair "itched"; small gray hairs were visible on her chin. A CNA confirmed the presence of gray chin hairs and acknowledged the resident needed shaving, stating it would be addressed with the next scheduled shower. A further resident with chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, heart failure, moderate intellectual disabilities, anxiety, depression, and PTSD required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene and had a care plan for assistance with self-care, including personal hygiene. Her shower schedule called for showers on Monday and Thursday nights, with complete shaves for men and women. Review of documentation showed her last recorded shower/bath was nearly a year earlier, with no indication of additional personal hygiene or facial hair removal on that date. Observations on two separate days showed long white hairs on her chin and jaw line, which a CNA later confirmed, stating facial hair removal should occur with baths/showers or as needed. A resident with end stage renal disease, respiratory failure, hyperlipidemia, and congestive heart failure, who had impaired cognition and required partial/moderate assistance with bathing and personal hygiene, was scheduled for showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Review of shower documentation from admission through early April revealed no showers provided or refusals documented on at least ten scheduled shower days. In interviews, this resident reported not receiving scheduled showers, was unsure of his shower days, and stated he could use a good scrub down, adding that he had asked aides who told him they did not have time. A CNA explained that shower days appear on shower sheets and in the computer and that CNAs are supposed to document daily, with nurses checking the documentation; the DON verified the resident had not received showers per schedule or preference. Another resident with a fracture of the lower end of the left humerus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis after cerebral infarction, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertensive heart disease, urinary retention, and osteoarthritis was care planned as non–weight bearing to the left upper extremity and requiring substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing. Her electronic record showed she was scheduled for showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. The shower task question "did the resident receive a shower/bath/bed bath?" was documented as "no" on three dates, indicating no shower/bath/bed bath was completed, and left unanswered on three additional dates. The DON confirmed that one missed shower was due to an outside appointment, that on two dates the "no" response meant no bathing of any type occurred, and that on three dates there was no documentation at all. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported that missing showers made her feel unimportant compared to others and that she did not feel clean when her shower was missed. Facility policy on routine resident care stated that showers, tub baths, and shampoos are to be scheduled according to person-centered care or state guidelines, with additional showers given upon request, but the documented and observed care did not reflect consistent provision of scheduled bathing and shaving for these residents.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #5 received a shower by the STNA on 4/13/26. Resident #8 received a shower by the STNA on 4/8/26. Resident #9 received a shower and had their chin shaved by the STNA on 4/14/26. Resident #70 received a shower by the STNA on 4/13/26. Resident #76 received a shower and had their chin shaved by the STNA on 4/15/26. 2. Like residents are identified as residents who need assistance with showering and shaving. Utilizing the Shower Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, an audit of like residents will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure that showers and resident shaving are completed. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses and STNA's on the Routine Resident Care Policy to include bathing and shaving residents. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Shower Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of 4-6 residents weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure that showers and resident shaving are completed. Noncompliance found during audits will be addressed and assistance with showers and/or shaving provided. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Uncovered Urinary Catheter Drainage Bag Compromises Resident Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident’s right to privacy and dignity related to management of an indwelling urinary catheter. A resident admitted with malignant neoplasm of the esophagus and type II diabetes mellitus had a care plan identifying risk for urinary tract infection and catheter-related trauma due to an indwelling catheter for urinary retention. The care plan interventions included ensuring the catheter tubing was secured and the drainage bag was properly secured with a dignity cover in place. Physician orders directed that the resident’s 16 French indwelling urinary catheter be changed every 30 days and as needed, and the comprehensive MDS documented that the resident had an indwelling catheter and was cognitively intact. During observation, the resident was seen seated in a chair with the urinary catheter drainage bag hanging from the chair without a dignity cover, and dark yellow urine was visible in the bag from the hallway. In a later observation and interview, an LPN confirmed that the catheter bag was lying directly on the floor and did not have a dignity cover. Attempts to interview the resident to confirm cognitive status were unsuccessful, as the resident was unable to answer screening questions. Review of the facility’s “Resident Dignity & Personal Privacy” policy stated that the facility should provide care in a manner that respects and enhances each resident’s dignity, individuality, and right to personal property, which was not followed in this instance when the catheter drainage bag was left uncovered and visible.
Plan Of Correction
The Laurels of Athens wishes to have this plan of correction submitted as our written allegation of compliance. Preparation and/or execution of this plan of correction does not constitute admission to nor agreement with, either the existence of, or the scope and severity of, any of the cited deficiencies or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. This plan is prepared and/or executed to ensure continuing compliance with regulatory requirements. Our alleged date of compliance is 5/13/2026. 1. On 4/6/26, Resident #92's catheter bag was removed from the floor, the bag changed and covered for dignity by the licensed nurse. Resident #92 discharged from the facility on 4/11/26. 2. Like Residents are identified as residents who utilize urinary catheters. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee for like residents utilizing the Urinary Catheter Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC to ensure catheter bags are covered for dignity and not laying directly on the floor. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses on the Indwelling Urinary Catheter Policy as well as Resident Dignity & Personal Privacy Policy to include privacy covers are in place for urinary catheters and that the catheter is not laying on the floor. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Urinary Catheter Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit of all residents with catheters weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure catheter bags are covered for dignity and not laying directly on the floor. Any catheters found to be touching the floor or uncovered will be removed from the floor, the bag changed and covered for dignity. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Failure to Prevent Possible Misappropriation and Poor Documentation of PRN Narcotics
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failure to prevent potential misappropriation of a resident’s narcotic medication and failure to ensure accurate documentation of controlled substance administration. A cognitively intact resident with chronic pain related to an internal orthopedic device and left knee pain had an order for oxycodone 5 mg PO every four hours PRN for pain and a care plan directing staff to administer medications as ordered and observe for effectiveness and side effects. The resident’s MDS showed she rated her pain as 7/10 and received opioid medication. However, review of the February MAR and the narcotic log revealed multiple discrepancies between narcotic sign-outs and documented administration. On several occasions, oxycodone doses were signed out on the narcotic log by an RN without corresponding documentation on the MAR. Specifically, oxycodone was signed out on one evening at 9:30 p.m. with no MAR entry, and again on a subsequent night at 1:30 a.m. and 5:30 a.m. with no MAR entries for those times. Another dose was signed out at 9:00 p.m. while the MAR reflected administration at 10:16 p.m., and a later dose at 5:30 a.m. was documented on both the narcotic log and MAR. There was also no documentation of pain assessments before or after PRN opioid administration. These documentation gaps meant there was no evidence that all narcotic doses signed out were actually administered to the resident. Staff interviews further highlighted concerns about the handling of narcotics. A CNA/med tech reported frequently taking the narcotic keys from the RN and described the RN’s behavior as erratic, with repeated problems involving incorrect narcotic counts and missing documentation on both the MAR and narcotic log. The resident stated she did not receive oxycodone more than once or twice a day, preferring to take Tylenol the rest of the time, which conflicted with the number of oxycodone doses signed out. When questioned, the RN gave inconsistent explanations about how often she pulled and administered PRN narcotics and acknowledged struggling with the new system, while also suggesting the resident may have received PRN tizanidine instead of remembering oxycodone. The facility’s investigation concluded that evidence was inconclusive as to whether misappropriation occurred or whether the issue was solely lack of documentation, but confirmed there was no evidence the resident received all doses signed out on the narcotic log.
Plan Of Correction
1. Resident #99 had a Self-Reported Incident submitted and investigated via the EIDC on 3/2/26. The investigation was inconclusive as we could not prove that misappropriation occurred. On 2/24/26, Resident #99 was interviewed and pain assessed by Director of Nursing and resident had no ill effects related to the inconsistent documentation in the medical record as it relates to her controlled substance pain medication. 2. Like Residents are identified as residents who utilize controlled substance PRN pain medications. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing or designee for like residents utilizing the Controlled Substance Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC to ensure PRN controlled substance pain medications that are signed off the control sheet are documented in the resident medical record as well. This audit along with identified corrections will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will re-educate licensed nurses on the Controlled Substances Policy to include appropriate documentation of controlled substances. In addition, the licensed nurses will be re-educated by the Director of Nursing or designee on the Abuse Prohibition Policy to include misappropriation of resident property. This education will be completed on or before 5/13/26. 4. Utilizing the Controlled Substance Audit Tool which was created on 4/20/26 by the Director of Nursing for the purpose of this POC, the Director of Nursing or designee will complete an audit three controlled substance sheets from each of the nine medication carts for a total of twenty-seven sheets weekly for four weeks, beginning 5/14/26 to ensure PRN controlled substance pain medications that are signed off the control sheet are documented in the resident medical record as well. Inconsistencies noted from the audit will be investigated for misappropriation. Negative findings to be addressed immediately and negative trends or system wide issues will be reported to the QAPI committee, and the action plan will be adjusted as needed.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
