Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Austin Trace Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to assess a resident for the use of physical restraints, specifically alarms, despite the resident's history of falls and medical conditions. The facility's policy requires restraint assessments, but none were documented for the alarms used. The Corporate Nurse confirmed the lack of assessments, contradicting the facility's policy on restraint use.
A facility failed to implement fall interventions for a resident with a history of falls, as outlined in their care plan. The resident, with multiple medical conditions and moderate cognitive impairment, required specific interventions like non-skid strips and visual reminders, which were missing from their room. This oversight was confirmed by an STNA, highlighting a failure to adhere to the facility's Fall Management policy.
A resident with ALS and a PEG tube for enteral feedings experienced a deficiency in care when the facility failed to maintain the tube's integrity. The tube had a break, and staff used medical tape to address the issue, which was not in line with proper procedures. Despite the resident's awareness of the problem, staff continued to use the tube improperly, leading to a hospital visit for replacement. Interviews revealed a lack of communication and awareness among staff regarding the tube's condition.
A resident's medications were left unsecured at the bedside for several days, contrary to the facility's policy requiring staff to administer medication and remain with the resident while it is swallowed. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a PEG tube, confirmed the medications were left without a physician's order. The RN was unaware of the medications' contents or duration at the bedside.
Failure to Assess Resident for Physical Restraint Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was properly assessed for the use of physical restraints, specifically alarms, which are considered restraints under the facility's policy. The resident in question had a history of falls and was diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy, diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, anxiety, and hypertension. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated moderately impaired cognition and a need for supervision and assistance with daily activities. Despite the use of bed and chair alarms, there was no documentation of restraint assessments being completed for these devices. Observations confirmed the presence of pressure-sensitive alarms and a pull-tab alarm for the resident, yet the facility did not conduct the necessary restraint assessments as required by their policy. The Corporate Nurse acknowledged that the facility did not consider these alarms as physical restraints, which contradicted the facility's policy defining physical restraints. The policy mandates that restraint assessments be conducted upon admission and as needed, with a physician's order and informed consent obtained, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Implement Fall Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that fall interventions were in place for a resident, as outlined in their comprehensive care plan. The resident, who had a history of falls and was at risk for further incidents, was admitted with medical diagnoses including polyneuropathy, arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated moderate cognitive impairment and a need for supervision with certain activities. The care plan, dated over two years prior, specified interventions such as keeping the call light within reach, placing non-skid strips in front of the toilet, and posting visual reminders to call for help. During an observation, it was noted that the resident's room lacked the specified non-skid strips and visual reminders, which were confirmed missing by a State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA). The facility's policy on Fall Management, dated several years earlier, required that a plan be identified and implemented to protect residents from recurrence of falls, and that the care plan should reflect the resident's safety needs and interventions. The absence of these interventions in the resident's environment indicates a failure to adhere to the care plan and facility policy, contributing to the deficiency identified by the surveyors.
Failure to Maintain Intact PEG Tube
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was intact and functioning properly for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and dependence on a ventilator. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a PEG tube for enteral feedings and required substantial assistance with daily activities. A physician's order was in place to flush the PEG tube with water three times daily, and there was an order for non-emergent transport to the hospital for PEG tube replacement. However, during an observation, it was noted that the PEG tube had medical tape wrapped around it, which was slightly soiled, indicating a possible leak or break in the tube. The resident confirmed that the tape was applied due to a hole in the tube, and staff were aware of the issue but continued to use the tube by pinching it off instead of using the provided clamp. Interviews with nursing staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the condition of the PEG tube. One nurse confirmed the presence of the tape but was unaware of any leakage, while another nurse believed the tape was applied at the hospital. A nurse's note later confirmed that the PEG tube was leaking and could not be replaced in-house, leading to the resident being sent to the hospital for a new tube. The hospital's emergency room note corroborated the malfunction, stating the tube had a crack and was taped. The facility's policy on enteral tube feeding emphasized monitoring for complications and notifying healthcare providers, which was not adequately followed in this case.
Medication Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were consumed at the time of administration and not left unsecured at the bedside, affecting one resident. During an observation, a registered nurse was found to have left three medication cups with four white tablets on a resident's bedside table. The nurse was unaware of the contents of the medication cups and how long they had been there. The medications were subsequently discarded in the biohazard bin. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube for enteral feedings, confirmed that the medication cups had been on the bedside table for several days. There was no documentation in the medical record to support a physician's order allowing medications to be left at the bedside. The facility's medication administration policy requires staff to administer medication and remain with the resident while it is swallowed, and prohibits leaving medication in the resident's room without orders to do so.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 584 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Centerville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otterbein Springboro | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| St Leonard Hcc | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Centerville Health And Rehab | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Hillspring Health Care & Rehab | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Centerville Post Acute | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Austin Trace Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.