Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively intact resident with respiratory failure and a tracheostomy/ventilator-related care needs was not included in care plan conferences, and the record showed only facility staff attended the meetings. The resident stated the facility was not allowing participation in care planning, while the DON and RT Director said it would be appropriate for the resident to be involved; the facility policy required the interdisciplinary team to develop a person-centered care plan with the resident and/or representative.
Late Significant Change MDS Assessment: A resident with bilateral femur fractures and major depressive disorder had a significant change in status MDS assessment completed and transmitted late. The MDS Director confirmed the assessment was not finished within the required 14-day timeframe after the ARD, and stated the MDS process depended on an LPN waiting for an RN signature before completion.
Late Quarterly MDS Assessments: Quarterly MDS assessments were not completed within the required ARD + 14-day timeframe for three residents. The affected residents had significant medical needs, including hemiplegia with trach/PEG/vent status, bilateral femur fractures with major depressive disorder, and osteomyelitis with stump dehiscence and depression. The MDS Director confirmed the assessments were completed late and stated the MDS process depended on RN signature before completion.
Incomplete Ventilator and Tracheostomy Care Plans: The facility failed to develop resident-centered care plans for ventilator and tracheostomy management for multiple residents with respiratory failure and related diagnoses. One resident had no documented care plan, another had only enhanced barrier precautions listed, and a third also had no care plan for ventilator/trach care. RT, MDS, RTD, and DON acknowledged the missing resident-specific care plans and the facility policy required individualized plans with measurable objectives and timetables.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Existing Skin Condition: A resident with DM, hemiplegia, and major depressive disorder had multiple scratches, scabbing, and dry skin on both lower extremities documented over several months, but the care plan was not updated to include the current skin condition, goals, or interventions. The resident reported severe itching and stated staff were not applying any treatment or creams, while the record also lacked physician orders for current treatment or topical interventions. An LPN and the DON confirmed the care plan had not been revised to reflect the existing skin issue.
A resident with diabetes, hemiplegia, and major depressive disorder had multiple itchy skin lesions, scratches, and scabbed areas on both legs, but staff did not provide documented treatment, topical care, or wound team assessment. The record lacked physician orders for treatment, the care conference did not document discussion of the skin issue, and interviews with the wound care staff, LPN, and DON confirmed the condition had not been reported or addressed as expected.
Failure to document and provide ordered wound care for a resident with multiple wounds, including pressure ulcers, osteomyelitis, and malnutrition. The resident was ventilator dependent and receiving tube feeding, and observations showed saturated wound dressings. The record lacked documentation for several ordered wound treatments, while the wound care LPN said the missing entries were likely documentation errors and could not produce proof the care was completed. The DON stated blank treatment record entries meant the care was not documented as provided.
Incomplete POLST Forms and Missing POA Documentation: The facility failed to complete required POLST sections for several residents and did not have POA/guardian/surrogate documentation in the medical record for others. Records showed family members signing POLST sections without supporting legal authority, one cognitively intact resident had a family member sign without documentation of incapacity, and multiple POLST forms were missing decisional capacity, signature, name, date, or physician information. The DON acknowledged the forms were incomplete and missing required information.
Water Management Plan Not Completed and Implemented: The facility failed to complete and implement its WMP as part of the infection prevention and control program. The WMP lacked validation process details, the Maintenance Director said hot water temperatures were checked at the water heaters but the results were not documented, and residual disinfectant levels were not tested.
A resident with dysphagia, cerebrovascular disease, and muscle weakness was assessed as needing supervision or touching assistance with eating, and the care plan directed one-person supervision during meals. However, ADL charting repeatedly lacked documentation of meal assistance and often coded eating as set-up/clean-up only instead of the required supervision level, which the MDS Director, CNA, and DON all confirmed was incomplete and not consistent with the care plan.
The facility failed to provide quarterly trust account statements to a resident and two others, leading to grievances and financial confusion. One resident was unaware of a $5000 past due bill, while another suspected potential fraud. The BOM, new to the position, had not distributed statements and was unaware of grievances. The Regional BOM found improper fund management, and the Administrator noted recent management changes.
The facility failed to address grievances from three residents regarding their trust account statements, leading to frustration and suspicion. Despite filing grievances, the residents did not receive their statements, and the facility's grievance process lacked documentation and resolution. The Business Office Manager and Administrator, both new to their positions, were unaware of the grievances and acknowledged the lack of follow-through.
A resident with quadriplegia and other conditions did not receive scheduled restorative nursing services due to a staff meeting, and the session was not rescheduled. The resident's program included a standing frame activity designed by a PT, requiring two RNAs to perform. The facility's policy required restorative care to promote safety and independence, but scheduling conflicts and workload issues led to the deficiency.
The facility failed to provide physician-ordered medications for three residents, resulting in missed doses. A resident with epilepsy missed a dose of Keppra due to an unavailable supply. Another resident with GERD did not receive Protonix, and a third resident with osteoporosis missed Alendronate Sodium doses. The LPN acknowledged the oversight, and the DON explained the expectation to reorder medications 72 hours before depletion.
A resident was administered incorrect medications, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. An LPN gave a Cranberry Oral Tablet at an incorrect dosage and failed to administer a prescribed Fish Oil Capsule, mistaking it for Vitamin E. The facility's policy requires verification of the right medication, dose, and resident before administration.
The facility failed to label raw chicken stored in the walk-in refrigerator with the date and time it was placed there. During a kitchen tour, a pan of cut-up chicken was found without a label, contrary to facility policy. The Dietary Regional Director confirmed the labeling requirement but could not determine when the chicken was refrigerated.
Resident not included in person-centered care planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the care planning process included feedback and information from Resident 5, a cognitively intact resident with a BIMS score of 13/15. Resident 5 was admitted with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and urinary tract infection. On 09/09/2025, the resident stated the facility was not allowing participation in care planning for ventilator use and tracheostomy care. Record review showed care conferences were held on 08/05/2025, 08/12/2025, 08/21/2025, 08/29/2025, and 09/09/2025, but the resident was not identified as participating in the conferences and the record reflected only facility staff members were present. Staff interviews indicated the resident or representative would be included when possible, and both the RT Director and DON stated it would be appropriate for a resident with a BIMS of 13 to be involved in care planning. The facility policy titled Care Plan Comprehensive stated the interdisciplinary team, in coordination with the resident and/or representative, must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals.
Late Significant Change MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a significant change in status MDS assessment was completed within the required time frame for one resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including fracture of the neck of the left femur, displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the right femur, and major depressive disorder. The resident’s MDS record showed a significant change in status assessment with an ARD of 05/09/2025, and the CMS Final Validation Report documented that the assessment was submitted to CMS on 05/27/2025 and was completed late, more than 14 days after the ARD. During interview, the MDS Director stated that admission, quarterly, annual, and significant change in status assessments were transmitted to CMS upon completion. The MDS Director confirmed the resident’s significant change in status MDS should have been completed by 05/23/2025, 14 days after the ARD, when the change in status was identified, and acknowledged it was not completed on time. The MDS Director was the only person in the MDS department and stated being an LPN who had to wait for an RN to sign the assessments for completion. The CMS RAI OBRA-required Assessment Summary stated significant change in status MDS assessments should be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the determination date, and the facility policy stated the resident assessment coordinator was responsible for ensuring timely and appropriate resident assessments.
Late Quarterly MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure quarterly MDS assessments were completed within the required time frame for 3 of 32 sampled residents, including Resident 21, Resident 50, and Resident 58. Resident 21 was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, and dependence on ventilator status. The medical record showed quarterly MDS assessments with ARDs of 05/09/2025 and 08/07/2025, and the CMS Final Validation Report documented both assessments were submitted late and completed more than 14 days after the ARD. On 09/12/2025, the MDS Director confirmed the quarterly assessments were not completed on time and stated that admission, quarterly, annual, and significant change assessments were transmitted to CMS upon completion. Resident 50 was admitted with diagnoses including fracture of the neck of the left femur, displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the right femur, and major depressive disorder. The record showed a quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/06/2025, and the CMS Final Validation Report documented it was submitted on 09/09/2025 and completed late. Resident 58 was initially admitted, later readmitted, and discharged on 08/28/2025 with diagnoses including lower leg osteomyelitis, dehiscence of amputation stump, and depression. The record showed a quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/06/2025, and the CMS Final Validation Report documented it was submitted on 09/09/2025 and completed late. The MDS Director confirmed both quarterly assessments should have been completed no later than 14 calendar days after the ARD and acknowledged they were not completed on time; the MDS Director was the only person in the MDS department and stated being an LPN who had to wait for an RN to sign the assessments for completion.
Incomplete Ventilator and Tracheostomy Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure comprehensive, resident-centered care plans were developed and implemented for ventilator use and tracheostomy care for 3 of 32 sampled residents. Resident 1 was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and protein-calorie malnutrition, and was observed on multiple occasions lying in bed, ventilator dependent, receiving tube feeding, with eyes closed. The medical record lacked documented evidence of a care plan for management of the ventilator and tracheostomy. Resident 4 was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including respiratory failure and dependence on respirator. The care plan in the medical record included enhanced barrier precautions due to the use of a ventilator and tracheostomy, but no other care plan regarding management was included. Resident 10 was admitted with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage and chronic respiratory failure, and was also observed on multiple occasions lying in bed, ventilator dependent, receiving tube feeding, with eyes closed. The medical record revealed there was no care plan in place for the care and management of the tracheostomy and ventilator. The RT, MDS Coordinator, RT Director, and DON all acknowledged that the residents should have had resident-specific care plans for ventilator and tracheostomy care, and the facility policy stated that individualized comprehensive care plans should include measurable objectives and timetables and identify professional services responsible for each element of care.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Existing Skin Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan after a new skin condition was identified for Resident 89, who was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms. On 09/09/2025, the resident was observed in bed with both legs exposed from the knees down and had multiple skin lesions on both legs, with more lesions on the left leg than the right. The lesions included scabbed areas and multiple linear scratch marks, some bright red and fresh and others darker red and scabbed. The resident reported that both legs itched very much, that the resident could not help scratching them, and that staff were not applying any treatment, creams, or other interventions and that nothing was being done for the legs. The medical record showed Body Checks documenting the skin condition beginning on 03/04/2025 with multiple scratches on the left knee and on 03/14/2025 with scabbing to the bilateral lower extremities. Subsequent Body Checks through 08/25/2025 continued to document multiple scratches, scabbing, dry skin, knee scabs, and old scabs. The record lacked documented physician orders for current treatment, medication, or topical interventions for the skin condition, and the care plan dated 06/19/2025 did not identify the resident's current skin condition or include goals and interventions. An LPN stated the care plan should have been updated when the first signs of wounds and scratches were identified, and the DON confirmed the care plan was not updated to reflect the existing skin condition, goals, and interventions.
Failure to Treat Resident Skin Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure treatment was provided for a resident with an identified skin condition. Resident 89 was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms. On observation, the resident was in bed with both legs exposed from the knees down and had multiple skin lesions on both legs, with more lesions on the left leg than the right. The lesions included scabbed areas and multiple linear scratch marks, some bright red and fresh and others darker red and scabbed. The resident reported both legs itched very much, that the resident could not help but scratch them, and that staff were not applying any treatment, creams, or other interventions. The medical record showed Body Checks documenting the resident’s skin condition from the initial identification of skin issues through the most recent Body Check, which continued to note multiple scratches, scabbing, dry skin, knee scabs, and old scabs. However, the quarterly interdisciplinary care conference lacked documentation that the skin condition was discussed, the pressure injury/skin problem status section was blank, and the record lacked physician orders for current treatment, medication, or topical interventions. The record also lacked evidence that the resident was assessed or treated by the wound care team during the reviewed period, and progress notes did not document treatment for the skin condition. Staff interviews confirmed the skin condition had not been reported to the wound care team or physician as expected, and the DON acknowledged notification was not done and that there was no physician order for treatment or medication.
Failure to Document and Provide Ordered Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure ordered wound care treatments were implemented for one resident with multiple wound care needs. The resident was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including pressure ulcers, osteomyelitis, and protein-calorie malnutrition, and was ventilator dependent and receiving tube feeding. During observations on multiple days, the resident was lying in bed with wound dressings saturated. The record showed physician orders for wound care to the left buttock, lower right leg, right buttock, right lateral leg, left medial leg, right lateral ankle, and right heel, along with an order for bilateral heel protectors when in bed and protein liquid for skin healing. A review of the medical record found no documentation that wound care treatment was provided on several dates. On interview, the wound care LPN stated wound care was provided seven days a week by two wound care nurses with overlapping coverage, and that floor nurses were responsible for as-needed wound care changes after 3 PM. The LPN acknowledged the missing dates in the treatment administration record and said they were most likely documentation errors, but could not provide any further documentation to confirm the treatments were performed. The DON stated that a blank box in the treatment administration record meant the ordered care was not provided and documented in the electronic health record, and that staff were expected to accurately record completed treatments.
Incomplete POLST Forms and Missing POA Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all required sections of the Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms were completed for four residents and failed to ensure that Power of Attorney (POA) documentation was present in the medical record for three residents. The deficient practice involved residents whose records showed POLST forms signed in part by family members or representatives, but the records did not contain supporting documentation showing that those individuals were legal guardians, durable power of attorney holders, or healthcare surrogates. The report states this created the potential for the residents' treatment preferences and decision-making authority not to be known or honored. For one resident admitted with chronic respiratory failure, pressure ulcers, osteomyelitis, and protein-calorie malnutrition, the POLST indicated full treatment and was signed by the physician, while a family member signed in the section for the durable power of attorney and/or guardian. The form indicated the resident lacked decisional capacity, but the medical record did not contain evidence of a legal guardian, durable power of attorney, or healthcare surrogate. A similar issue was found for another resident admitted with respiratory failure and dependence on a respirator, whose POLST was signed by the physician and a family member in the healthcare surrogate section, yet the record lacked documentation of surrogate authority. A third resident had a BIMS score of 13/15 and was documented as cognitively intact, but the POLST still had a family member sign in the durable power of attorney and/or guardian section without documentation showing the resident lacked decisional capacity or that the signer had legal authority. The facility also failed to complete required POLST sections for three additional residents. One resident with a fractured femur, rheumatoid arthritis, and age-related cognitive decline had a POLST documenting attempt CPR and full treatment, but the form lacked the section indicating decisional capacity, the physician signature and information, and the printed resident name and date of resident signature. Another resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, COPD, and chronic pain syndrome had a POLST documenting DNR/allow natural death, but the form did not include the required decisional capacity section. A third resident with diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms had a POLST documenting attempt CPR, but the form lacked the decisional capacity section and did not include a resident or representative signature, printed name, or date of signature. The DON acknowledged that the POLST forms for these residents were incomplete and missing required information, and the facility policy stated that health care decisions should be communicated so resident rights would be honored.
Water Management Plan Not Completed and Implemented
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the Water Management Plan was completed and implemented as part of its infection prevention and control program. Review of the Water Management Plan found it lacked information about the validation process used to confirm the program effectively controlled hazardous conditions throughout the building's water system. The Maintenance Director stated that hot water temperatures were tested at the water heaters to ensure they were above 113 degrees Fahrenheit, but the temperature results were not documented, and the facility did not test residual disinfectant levels.
Incomplete Meal Assistance Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with dysphagia, cerebrovascular disease, and muscle weakness received meal assistance in accordance with the resident’s assessment and care plan. The resident’s admission MDS documented a need for supervision or touching assistance with eating, and the care plan directed that one person provide supervision assistance for meals. However, the ADL charting for September 2024 did not document meal assistance on multiple breakfast and lunch occasions, and other entries frequently coded the resident’s eating as 5, indicating set-up or clean-up assistance rather than the required supervision level of 04. During interviews, the MDS Director confirmed that CNAs or licensed nurses were expected to be in the room to supervise the resident while eating and that CNAs were expected to document the level of assistance every meal. The MDS Director acknowledged that the resident’s charting was incomplete, that blank entries were left for several meals, and that there was no documentation the resident refused meals. The CNA and DON also confirmed that meal assistance should have been documented every meal and that the resident’s ADL documentation for eating, including meal percentage, was incomplete. The facility policy stated that residents unable to perform ADLs independently would receive services necessary to maintain good nutrition and appropriate dining assistance in accordance with the plan of care.
Failure to Provide Trust Account Statements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently provide residents with quarterly trust account statements, affecting one sampled resident and two unsampled residents. Resident 30, who was responsible for their finances and had normal memory function, reported not receiving a trust account statement for a long time despite previously receiving them monthly. This resident had filed a grievance about four months prior regarding the lack of statements but had not received a response from the facility. Resident 31, also responsible for their finances and with normal memory function, expressed frustration over not receiving a trust account statement despite filing a grievance. This resident was shocked to receive a facility bill showing a past due amount of $5000, which they were unaware of how to pay. Resident 72, who had congestive heart failure and was responsible for their finances, reported receiving only one trust account statement after involving the Ombudsman and filing a grievance. This resident felt frustrated and suspicious of potential fraud due to the lack of regular statements. The Business Office Manager (BOM), who started the position in June 2024, admitted to not distributing monthly statements since beginning work and was unaware of the grievances filed by the residents. The BOM acknowledged that Resident 31 had overdrawn their trust account by withdrawing cash daily without checking the balance. The Regional BOM confirmed that Resident 31 had not paid their share of cost for three months and had overdrawn petty cash, which was not in accordance with proper management of resident funds. The facility's Administrator noted recent management changes and that the current BOM was being assisted by a corporate consultant to learn facility procedures for managing trust accounts and billing.
Failure to Address Resident Grievances on Trust Account Statements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately address grievances related to trust account statements for three residents, leading to feelings of frustration and suspicion among the residents. Resident 30, who was responsible for their finances and had normal memory function, reported not receiving a trust account statement for a long time despite filing a grievance four months prior. The grievance documentation indicated that the account was to be audited, but there was no evidence that the resident received the statement or that the grievance was resolved. Similarly, Resident 31, also responsible for their finances and with normal memory function, had not received a trust account statement since admission. Despite filing a grievance, there was no documentation of resolution or assignment of responsibility for addressing the concern. Resident 72, who had congestive heart failure and was responsible for their finances, received a trust account statement only after involving the Ombudsman. However, the statements were not provided monthly as required, and the grievance documentation lacked evidence of resolution. The facility's grievance process was not followed, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and resolution of the grievances. The Business Office Manager, who was new to the position, had not distributed monthly statements and was unaware of the grievances. The Administrator, also new to the position, acknowledged the lack of follow-through and resolution in the grievance process. The facility's policy required immediate action and notification of resolution within 72 hours, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Restorative Nursing Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide restorative nursing services as ordered and scheduled for a resident, identified as Resident 16, who was admitted with diagnoses including quadriplegia, age-related osteoporosis, muscle wasting and atrophy, and polyneuropathy. The resident's restorative nursing program, designed by a physical therapist, included a standing frame activity scheduled once weekly on the day shift. However, the resident did not receive the scheduled session on 09/12/2024 because all nursing staff attended a meeting, and the session was not rescheduled. Interviews with the resident and restorative nurse assistants (RNAs) confirmed the missed session and revealed that the facility employed three RNAs, with two required to perform the standing frame activity. The RNAs cited workload and scheduling conflicts as reasons for not rescheduling the session. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the RNAs should have reported the missed session, which could have been rescheduled. The facility's policy stated that residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to promote optimal safety and independence.
Medication Availability Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the availability of physician-ordered medications for three residents, leading to missed doses. Resident 29, diagnosed with epilepsy, did not receive their morning dose of Keppra on 09/17/2024 because the medication supply had run out. The LPN confirmed that the medication was not available and needed to be reordered. The Nurse Practitioner was made aware of the missed dose the following day, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented the missed dose. Resident 72, with a diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, did not receive their scheduled dose of Protonix on 09/17/2024 due to the medication being unavailable. Similarly, Resident 16, diagnosed with quadriplegia and osteoporosis, missed doses of Alendronate Sodium on 09/10/2024 and 09/17/2024 because the medication was not reordered in time. The LPN acknowledged the oversight and confirmed the absence of documentation for the missed doses. The Director of Nursing explained that medications should be reordered at least 72 hours before the supply runs out.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent, as evidenced by a 7.41% error rate observed during a Medication Administration Pass. This deficiency involved a resident with multiple diagnoses, including quadriplegia and polyneuropathy, who was administered incorrect medications. During the observation, an LPN prepared and administered medications to the resident, including a Cranberry Oral Tablet at an incorrect dosage of 450 mg instead of the prescribed 300 mg. The LPN acknowledged that the physician's order was not followed due to the use of house stock, which was not clarified. Additionally, the LPN failed to administer a Fish Oil Capsule 3,000 mg as prescribed, mistakenly believing it was the same as Vitamin E 180 mg, which was given instead. The Fish Oil Capsule was available in the medication cart but was not administered due to this confusion. The Director of Nursing later confirmed that nurses are expected to verify the physician's order and ensure the right medication, dose, and resident before administration, as per the facility's policy on administering medications.
Failure to Label Raw Chicken in Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that raw chicken stored in the walk-in refrigerator was labeled with the date and time it was placed there. During a kitchen tour, a metal pan containing approximately 10 pounds of cut-up chicken was found covered with plastic wrap but lacking any labeling. The Dietary Regional Director confirmed that the facility's policy requires all refrigerated products to be labeled with the product name, date, and time of refrigeration. However, the chicken did not have such a label, and the Dietary Regional Director was unable to determine when the chicken had been placed in the refrigerator.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 534 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Las Vegas
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver State Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Horizon Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Las Vegas Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Premier Health & Rehabilitation Center Of Lv, Lp | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
| Silver Ridge Healthcare Center | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.