Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care At Evergreens during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Kitchen sanitation and food storage deficiencies were observed during tours of two kitchens. Staff were seen without required hair restraints, including a beard guard issue, and several food-contact and storage areas were unclean or improperly maintained, including debris on plate warmer drawers, debris buildup on convection ovens, ice buildup in the freezer, wet nesting of pans, and a damaged ceiling tile/open ceiling area from leaks. Surveyors also found multiple opened food items without dates, dry goods left unsealed or loosely wrapped, and supplies stored too close to sprinkler heads.
The facility was found deficient in handling potentially hazardous foods and maintaining sanitation. Observations included inadequate hand washing, presence of fruit flies in a trash can, unlabeled prepared carrots, improper use of beard guards by staff, and wet nested dishware. These issues indicate non-compliance with the facility's policies on sanitation and food safety.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and fragile skin was found to have a large bruise on the left forearm, which was not documented or investigated by the facility. The Care Plan intervention to pad siderails was not fully implemented, and staff communication regarding the bruise was inadequate. The nurse responsible for the skin assessment relied on a CNA's report instead of conducting a visual assessment, leading to a failure in following facility policies on skin integrity and incident reporting.
Kitchen sanitation and food storage deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices and to properly store foods in a safe and sanitary environment during tours of two kitchens. In the Country Kitchen, a Dietary Aide was observed coming out of the rear kitchen area without a hair restraint for a lengthy thick dark beard, and the Director of Culinary Services stated he did not think a beard net was required unless food production or handling was being performed. In the front area, two plate warmer drawers holding clean plates had sticky brown debris on the handle and inside trim, and there was a square opening in the ceiling above a toaster oven-like unit where the DCS stated there had been a leak and maintenance had not fixed the ceiling yet. The surveyor also observed multiple food storage issues in the Country Kitchen and rear kitchen area. An open 64-ounce tub of peanut butter had a received date but no opened date, and an opened quart container of almond milk in the refrigerator also had no opened date. During the main kitchen tour, the walk-in freezer had a large buildup of ice on the floor under shelving and extending toward the center. An opened half gallon of whole milk in the produce walk-in refrigerator had no opened date, a woman seated near the pot wash area was without a hair restraint, and stacked metal pans contained water between them, indicating wet nesting. The double stack convection ovens had a large buildup of debris, and the DCS stated they should be cleaned weekly. Additional storage and sanitation concerns were observed in the storeroom and dry storage area. Two boxes of vinyl gloves and one box of thickener were stored less than 18 inches from the ceiling/sprinkler heads. Multiple dry storage items were opened without opened dates, including maple syrup, sesame oil, vanilla, dry pasta, powdered sugar, corn starch, and split peas; some items were also unsealed or loosely wrapped. A white ceiling tile over a dry storage rack was bowed, cracked, and discolored from a recent leak. Facility policies reviewed by surveyors required beard guards and hair restraints in food production areas, weekly cleaning of convection ovens, proper food storage and date marking, and storing cleaned equipment to prevent contamination.
Deficiencies in Food Handling and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner, as observed by the surveyor. During the inspection, the Regional Culinary Director (RCD) washed her hands for only 12 seconds, which is below the recommended 15-20 seconds to prevent cross-contamination and food-borne illnesses. Additionally, a trash can at the hand washing sink was found to have small flying insects, identified as fruit flies, and contained a paper towel with orange discoloration and crawling insects. The Produce Refrigerator contained a half pan of carrots that were not labeled with a preparation or use-by date, which is against the facility's policy for date marking ready-to-eat foods. Further observations revealed that two line cooks and one prep staff were wearing beard guards that did not cover their mustaches, which is necessary to prevent hair from entering food. A multi-tiered shelving unit for clean and dry dishware had wet nested pans, which can promote bacteria growth. The facility's policies on hand washing, trash management, date marking, personal appearance standards, and ware washing were not adhered to, contributing to the deficiencies noted during the survey.
Failure to Investigate Bruise and Follow Care Plan for Resident with Fragile Skin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify and investigate a bruise of unknown origin on a resident with fragile skin, as well as to follow the interventions outlined in the resident's Care Plan. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance with activities of daily living, was observed by a surveyor to have a large, irregularly shaped bruise on the left forearm. Despite this observation, the nursing progress notes did not document the bruise, and the weekly skin assessment performed by a nurse after the surveyor's observation also failed to note any skin abnormalities. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the bruise. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported that the bruise was identified by a hospice companion a week prior and was communicated to a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who denied receiving such information. The LPN admitted that an incident report should have been completed, and an investigation should have been conducted, but this was not done. Additionally, the Care Plan intervention to pad the resident's siderails was not fully implemented, as only one siderail was padded. Further investigation by the surveyor found that the nurse responsible for the skin assessment relied on the CNA's report rather than conducting a visual assessment herself. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the presence of the bruise and acknowledged that the nurse should have initiated an investigation. The facility's policies on skin integrity and incident reporting were not followed, contributing to the failure to address the resident's condition appropriately.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,845 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 27 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Moorestown
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Careone At Moorestown | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Total Rehab Moorestown | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Wynwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Sterling Manor | 3.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care At Evergreens.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.