Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sinai Post-acute Nursing & Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary environment, with standing gray water under sinks in the dishwashing area, a leaking dishwasher and sink, and broken floor tiles that prevented proper drainage into the sump pump. A blanket saturated with gray water was found on the floor in the dish room, and leadership acknowledged awareness of the dishwasher leak and that gray water required manual mopping into the sump pit. Mouse droppings were observed in a shower room, soiled utility rooms on multiple floors, and under the head of the bed in a resident’s room, despite the presence of traps and regular pest control visits. Housekeeping and maintenance leadership reported ongoing, building-wide mouse activity, with daily reports from residents and staff, while pest control logs confirmed continued treatment efforts that had not resolved the infestation.
A resident dependent on staff for colostomy management did not receive consistent ostomy care when the colostomy drainage bag was not emptied during the overnight shift, resulting in the bag bursting and soiling the resident and bed. The oversight was acknowledged by the responsible nurse, who stated she forgot to check on the resident due to being busy.
A resident with a history of mood and anxiety disorders witnessed the death of another resident and subsequently experienced increased anxiety, depression, and substance use. Despite these changes, the care plan was not updated to include emotional support services, and the social worker did not escalate the resident's refusal to discuss the incident to the DON or administrator.
A resident with a history of substance abuse was found unresponsive after reportedly using illicit drugs with others in a peer's room. An LPN administered Narcan and performed CPR, but the resident died. Despite existing care plans and facility policies for monitoring and searching high-risk residents, staff did not conduct or document a thorough investigation following the incident, and key staff were not promptly interviewed.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple fractures was found to have a lidocaine patch applied to the right thigh instead of the right hip as ordered for pain management. An LPN confirmed the incorrect placement during a survey, and the DON acknowledged that the physician's order was not followed, as required by facility policy.
A resident with a history of mental health and substance use disorders did not receive necessary behavioral health care after witnessing the death of another resident following illicit drug use. The resident reported increased anxiety and depression, and although a social worker made one attempt to speak with the resident, there was no further follow-up or documentation. Facility staff did not provide or document psychosocial support, and relevant policies did not address procedures for such incidents.
A resident with a history of substance abuse and other medical conditions experienced two overdose incidents requiring Narcan. Despite these events, the care plan was not updated to reflect the changes in the resident's condition. Interviews with staff confirmed the oversight, which was contrary to the facility's policy requiring timely care plan updates.
The facility failed to follow physician orders and its Medication Administration Policy for two residents. One resident did not receive prescribed wound care on multiple occasions, and another did not receive a scheduled methadone dose. Documentation and PCP notification were lacking, as confirmed by staff interviews and policy review.
The LNHA failed to implement policies for resident rights and prevent seclusion, affecting 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) who were secluded and restrained by law enforcement. These residents were not allowed to participate in group activities or community dining and were kept in their rooms with metal ankle cuffs, without physician orders. Staff confirmed that these actions were due to instructions from the Bureau of Prisons, despite being against federal regulations.
The facility failed to ensure the rights of 11 Justice Involved Residents, who were secluded in their rooms, guarded by law enforcement, and not allowed to participate in group activities or community dining. They were served meals on disposable trays and some were observed with ankle restraints. Interviews revealed restrictions on communication and movement, violating their rights to autonomy and dignity.
The facility failed to treat 11 Justice Involved Residents with dignity and respect, as they were physically restrained with metal ankle cuffs and secluded from participating in group activities, community dining, and intermingling with other residents. These residents were also restricted from communicating with visitors and leaving their rooms at will. The facility did not have physician orders for the use of restraints, and the residents' care plans did not address the use of restraints or the need for constant supervision by detention guards.
The facility failed to support the self-determination of 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) by restricting their ability to make choices about their care, participate in activities, and interact with the community. The JIRs were confined to their rooms, only allowed to leave for showers, and not assessed for activities. Despite being alert and oriented, no individualized care plans were created for them, and they did not sign the facility Admission Agreement.
The facility failed to prevent the involuntary seclusion of 11 Justice Involved Residents, who were confined to their rooms and guarded by law enforcement officers. These residents were not allowed to participate in community activities or receive visitors without approval, and they wore ankle restraints. The facility did not implement care plans addressing the use of restraints or the supervision required by law enforcement officers, and there were no physician orders or consents for the restraints used.
The facility failed to ensure that 11 Justice Involved Residents were free from physical restraints, as they were shackled to their beds with metal chains and guarded by law enforcement. The use of restraints was not documented in care plans, and no consent was obtained. Facility staff were instructed not to mix JIRs with other residents, and the JIRs were isolated, unable to participate in activities or interact with others. The facility's actions resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation.
The facility failed to provide meaningful group and individualized activity programs for 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs), who were restricted to their rooms and not allowed to participate in group activities. Despite being alert and oriented, these residents did not have individualized care plans for activities, and the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was not completed. Staff interviews revealed that the Director of Recreation was instructed not to interact with the JIRs, and the facility's policy on activity programs was not followed.
Unsanitary Environmental Conditions and Rodent Infestation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the physical environment in a safe, functional, and sanitary condition, as evidenced by standing gray water, structural issues, and signs of rodent infestation. During observations in the dishwashing room, gray water was seen standing on the floor under the sink on both the clean and dirty sides, with a brown-stained blanket on the floor that was wet under the edge of the dishwasher. Broken floor tiles were noted to be lower than the lip of the sump pump, which prevented proper drainage and effective function of the sump pump, and gray water remained standing under the sink later in the morning. The Director of Dietary stated that the leaking dishwasher had been reported to maintenance and that water was coming from a leaking seal, and also confirmed that the sink on the dirty side leaked gray water onto the floor. The Vice President of Environmental Services acknowledged awareness of the dishwasher leak but not the leaking sinks, and confirmed that gray water could only be pumped out if someone manually mopped it into the sump pit. The facility also failed to maintain a sanitary environment free of pests, as evidenced by mouse droppings and reports of mice on multiple floors. Mouse droppings were observed along baseboards in a third-floor shower room, in a sixth-floor soiled utility room, and along the baseboard and under the head of the bed in one resident’s room. A live trap was present under the sink in a soiled utility room, but droppings were found along the baseboard and not within the trap. The housekeeping director reported daily reports of mice from residents and housekeeping staff and stated that mice had been seen on all floors, attributing this in part to resident hoarding and cold weather. The Maintenance Director stated there had been an ongoing problem with mice and bugs related to the building’s location and nearby demolition, and that pest control came twice a week, while the main office preferred less frequent visits. Pest control logs were provided, and the Vice President of Environmental Services stated that pest control had been coming but the problem persisted, despite a facility policy requiring environmental surfaces to be cleaned and disinfected according to CDC and OSHA standards.
Failure to Provide Consistent Ostomy Care for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident who was dependent on staff for colostomy management did not receive consistent ostomy care. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including colon cancer and a colostomy, was documented as requiring staff assistance for ostomy management according to the Minimum Data Set (MDS). The resident's care plan instructed nursing staff to keep the skin around the stoma clean and dry. However, during a review, it was found that the colostomy drainage bag had not been emptied during the overnight shift by the nurse on duty. On the following morning, a CNA discovered the resident with a full colostomy drainage bag that had burst, resulting in stool on the resident and the bed. The CNA alerted the nurse, who assessed the resident and found no skin excoriation. The nurse then cleaned the resident and notified the responsible party. When questioned, the overnight nurse admitted to forgetting to check on the resident due to being busy. The facility's policy emphasizes maintaining cleanliness and skin integrity for residents with ostomies, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Emotional Support After Resident Witnessed Death
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing emotional support services for a resident who witnessed the death of another resident. The resident, who had a history of mood disorder, opioid abuse, and anxiety disorder, reported increased anxiety and depression following the incident and stated that no one had spoken to them regarding the death. The resident also disclosed using cocaine after the event, which was brought into the facility by an outside individual. Despite these developments, the resident's individualized comprehensive care plan did not include interventions or support for emotional needs related to witnessing the death. Interviews revealed that the social worker attempted to speak with the resident about the incident, but the resident refused the conversation. The social worker did not report this refusal to the DON or the administrator, and the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's changed emotional status. The DON confirmed that emotional support services should have been included in the care plan after the resident witnessed the death, in accordance with the facility's policy requiring ongoing assessment and revision of care plans as residents' conditions change.
Failure to Supervise and Investigate After Resident Drug Overdose and Death
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure a safe environment for a resident with a known history of substance abuse, resulting in an unexpected death. The resident, who had diagnoses including major depressive disorder, opioid abuse, and cocaine abuse, was found unresponsive in another resident's room after reportedly smoking crack and cocaine with two other residents. An LPN responded to the emergency, administered Narcan twice, and performed CPR, but the resident did not recover. The care plan for this resident included interventions such as random room searches, toxicology screenings, and monitoring for signs of drug use and overdose, but these measures did not prevent the incident. Following the event, interviews revealed that staff were aware of the resident's high-risk status and the facility had policies in place for drug screening and searches, especially for residents returning from authorized out-on-pass visits. Despite these policies, the facility did not conduct or document a thorough investigation immediately after the incident where Narcan was administered. The DON stated that an investigation was not warranted at the time, and key staff involved in the incident were not interviewed promptly. Additionally, the facility's policy required that all incidents and accidents be documented and investigated as soon as they were reported, but this was not followed in this case. The lack of timely and comprehensive investigation, as well as insufficient supervision and monitoring of residents with known substance abuse histories, contributed to the deficient practice identified by the surveyors.
Failure to Follow Physician's Order for Pain Management Patch Placement
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) failed to follow a physician's order regarding pain management for a resident with significant medical needs. The resident, who had been admitted with a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur and an unspecified fracture of the sacrum, also had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance for activities of daily living. The physician's order specified that a lidocaine patch was to be applied topically to the resident's right hip in the morning for pain management and removed per schedule. During a surveyor's observation, it was found that the lidocaine patch had been applied to the resident's right thigh instead of the right hip as ordered. The LPN confirmed the incorrect placement when asked to review the order in the presence of the Unit Manager and surveyor. The facility's medication administration policy required medications to be administered according to prescribed orders, including verifying the correct method and site of administration. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the LPN should have followed the physician's order for the correct application site.
Failure to Provide Behavioral Health Care After Traumatic Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to a resident after the resident witnessed the death of another resident in their shared room, following an incident involving illicit drug use. The resident who witnessed the event had a documented history of major depressive disorder, unspecified mood disorder, opioid and alcohol abuse, substance-induced mood disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety disorder. The resident was on a methadone program and had interventions in place for substance abuse, including opportunities to vent feelings and random toxicology screenings. After the incident, the resident reported increased anxiety and depression and stated that no one from the facility spoke to them regarding the death. The social worker made one attempt to speak with the resident, who refused to discuss the incident, but did not make further attempts or document the refusal. The Director of Nursing was unaware of the social worker's visit and stated that the incident should have been discussed in an interdisciplinary care plan meeting and documented. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator also indicated that the social worker should have documented the interaction in the progress notes. A review of the resident's medical record showed that the physician and psychiatric nurse practitioner saw the resident after the incident, but there was no documentation of psychosocial support being provided. The facility's policies did not include procedures related to psychosocial support following such incidents, and the social worker's job description required working directly with residents experiencing emotional difficulties. The lack of follow-up and documentation resulted in the failure to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to the resident.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Resident Overdoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and revise the care plan in a timely manner for a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including a displaced oblique fracture of the right fibula, muscle wasting and atrophy, opioid dependence, and cocaine abuse. The resident was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living. On two separate occasions, the resident was found unresponsive due to suspected overdoses, requiring the administration of Narcan. Despite these significant incidents, the care plan, which initially identified the resident's risk for falls and history of poly-substance abuse, was not updated to reflect these changes in the resident's condition. Interviews with facility staff, including the Unit Manager and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the care plan was not updated following the incidents on 7/1/24 and 7/7/24. The facility's policy requires care plans to be updated within 24 to 48 hours when there is a change in condition, but this was not adhered to in this case. The failure to update the care plan was acknowledged by the staff, indicating a lapse in following the established procedures for care plan revisions.
Failure to Follow Medication Administration Policy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to physician orders and its own Medication Administration Policy for two residents, leading to deficiencies in medication administration. Resident #3, who was admitted with surgical aftercare needs, had a physician order to apply Silvadene cream to incision sites daily. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 showed no documentation of treatment on three specific dates, and there was no evidence that the Primary Care Physician (PCP) was notified of these omissions. This lack of documentation and communication indicates a failure to follow the prescribed treatment plan and facility policy. Similarly, Resident #4, who was on a methadone program for opioid dependence, had a physician order for a daily dose of Methadone Oral Solution. The MAR for July 2024 revealed that the medication was not documented as administered on one date, and there was no record of PCP notification. Interviews with the Unit Manager and Director of Nursing confirmed that nurses were expected to document medication administration and notify the PCP if medications were not given. The facility's Medication Administration Policy also required documentation of medication administration and reasons for any omissions, which was not followed in these cases.
Failure to Implement Resident Rights and Prevent Seclusion
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure the implementation of policies and procedures for resident rights and self-determination, as well as policies to prevent physical restraints and seclusion. This failure affected 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) who were admitted to the facility. These residents were not provided with the autonomy to participate in group activities, community dining, or to leave their rooms at will. They were also not afforded the opportunity to sign Admission Agreements upon admission. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation began when the first JIR was admitted and secluded by law enforcement officers. The IJ was identified when all 11 JIRs were observed being secluded in their rooms, guarded by law enforcement officers, and restricted from participating in normal resident activities. The facility's policies, which were supposed to ensure residents' rights to dignity, respect, and freedom from restraints, were not followed. The JIRs were kept in their rooms, guarded, and restrained with metal ankle cuffs, which were not ordered by a physician. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the facility's corporate offices instructed the administration not to mix JIRs with other residents and to keep them roomed together. The Director of Nursing and other staff members confirmed that the JIRs were being treated differently due to instructions from the Bureau of Prisons, which imposed restrictions on the JIRs. The LNHA acknowledged that these practices were against federal regulations but felt constrained by the Department of Justice's authority. The Medical Director was unaware of the restraints and seclusion, as he had not written any orders for such measures.
Violation of Resident Rights for Justice Involved Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIR) were afforded their rights to autonomy and dignity. These residents were secluded in their rooms, guarded by law enforcement officers, and not permitted to participate in group activities or community dining. They were also restricted from communicating freely with visitors and other residents, and were not allowed to leave their rooms at will. This situation was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of the residents. The report highlights that the JIRs were subjected to conditions that violated their rights as nursing home residents. They were served meals in their rooms on disposable trays and utensils, unlike other residents who used regular dishware. Some residents were observed with ankle restraints connected to their beds, further indicating a lack of freedom and dignity. Interviews with residents revealed that they were only allowed to leave their rooms for showers, which were supervised by prison guards, and they could only have private phone conversations with their lawyers. The facility's policies on dining environment and activity programs were not adhered to for the JIRs. The policies emphasized promoting a positive dining experience and encouraging maximum individual participation in activities, which were not provided to the JIRs. The Director of Social Work acknowledged that the seclusion of JIRs was against federal regulations, as it constituted a form of resident seclusion. The lack of care plans for supervision of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, restraints, activities, or seclusion further demonstrated the facility's failure to protect and promote the rights of these residents.
Violation of Resident Rights for Justice Involved Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a dignified and respectful manner, specifically concerning 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIR). These residents were physically restrained with metal ankle cuffs and secluded from participating in group activities, community dining, and intermingling with other residents. They were also restricted from communicating with visitors and leaving their rooms at will. This situation was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of the JIR residents and all other residents in the facility. The deficiency began when the first JIR was admitted to the facility and was secluded to the room by law enforcement officers. The surveyors observed that the JIRs were being guarded by law enforcement officers and were not permitted to participate in normal activities or leave their rooms unless escorted for showering. The facility's policies on resident rights, which include the right to be free from physical restraints and to have autonomy and choice, were not adhered to for these residents. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing, Licensed Practical Nurses, and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator, revealed that the facility was aware of the restrictions imposed on the JIRs by the Bureau of Prisons. However, the facility did not have physician orders for the use of restraints, and the residents' care plans did not address the use of restraints or the need for constant supervision by detention guards. The facility's administration acknowledged that the treatment of JIRs was not in line with federal regulations for long-term care facilities.
Facility Fails to Support Self-Determination of Justice Involved Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promote and facilitate the self-determination of 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs), denying them the right to make choices regarding their life and care, participate in activities, and interact with the community. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility's Corporate Office instructed the administration to shackle the JIRs, have them guarded by law enforcement officers, and prevent them from interacting with other residents. This directive led to the JIRs being confined to their rooms, only allowed to leave for showers twice a week, and not being assessed for or allowed to participate in any activities. The Director of Recreation confirmed that no activity assessments were completed for the JIRs, as they were informed by the Interdisciplinary Team and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) that the JIRs would not attend any activities. Interviews with the Unit Manager and Resident #4 revealed that the JIRs were restricted to their rooms, with limited privacy for phone calls, and were not allowed to mingle with other residents. Attempts by surveyors to interview other JIRs were denied by law enforcement officers. Medical records showed that the JIRs had various diagnoses, including osteomyelitis, multiple sclerosis, polyneuropathy, and dementia, among others. Despite being alert and oriented, with some able to make their own decisions, no individualized care plans were initiated to address their choices regarding significant aspects of their lives. Additionally, the JIRs did not sign the facility Admission Agreement, and their comprehensive Minimum Data Sets (MDS) were unavailable for review.
Involuntary Seclusion of Justice Involved Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) were free from involuntary seclusion, which is a violation of federal regulations. These residents were secluded from having autonomy and making choices about their daily lives and care, similar to other nursing home residents. The seclusion was enforced by law enforcement officers from the Bureau of Prisons, who guarded the residents and restricted their movement and interactions with others. The residents were confined to their rooms, wore metal ankle cuffs, and were not allowed to participate in community activities or receive visitors without approval from the U.S. Marshals. The facility's administration, including the Director of Nursing and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator, were aware of the situation but stated that the restrictions were imposed by the Bureau of Prisons, not the facility itself. Despite this, the facility did not implement care plans addressing the use of restraints or the supervision required by law enforcement officers. The residents' care plans did not document the restrictions on their activities of daily living, community interactions, or dining arrangements. Additionally, there were no physician orders or consents for the use of restraints, and the facility's policy on resident rights was not upheld. Observations by surveyors confirmed that the JIRs were confined to their rooms, guarded by law enforcement, and wore ankle restraints. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the JIRs were not allowed to leave their rooms except for showers, and they were served meals on disposable trays in their rooms. The facility's Director of Recreation and Director of Social Work were instructed not to interact with the JIRs or include them in activities, further isolating these residents from the rest of the facility's community.
Justice Involved Residents Restrained with Shackles
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) were free from physical restraints, as required by federal regulations. These residents were restrained with ankle shackles attached to their beds with metal chains, guarded by law enforcement officers. The use of restraints was not documented in the residents' care plans, and no consent for the use of physical restraints was obtained from the residents or their representatives. The facility's policy on physical restraints was not followed, as restraints were used without a physician's order or a pre-restraining assessment. The Director of Nursing (DON) and other facility staff were instructed by the facility's Corporate Offices not to mix JIRs with other residents and to room them together. The JIRs were not allowed to attend facility activities, intermingle with other residents, or leave their rooms except for showers. The facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) acknowledged that the restrictions were imposed by the Bureau of Prisons, not the facility, but admitted that the JIRs were treated differently than other residents. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Recreation and the Director of Social Work, revealed that the JIRs were isolated and not allowed to participate in activities or interact with other residents. The Medical Director was unaware of the restraints and did not write orders for them. The facility's actions resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation, as the JIRs were not treated with dignity and respect, and their rights were violated.
Failure to Provide Meaningful Activities for Justice Involved Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide meaningful group and individualized activity programs that reflected the residents' preferences, specifically for 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs). These residents were admitted with various diagnoses, including osteomyelitis, multiple sclerosis, polyneuropathy, and dementia, among others. Despite being alert and oriented, the residents did not have individualized care plans (CPs) implemented for activities or seclusion, and the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was still in progress and not completed. Interviews with the residents and staff revealed that the JIRs were restricted to their rooms and not allowed to participate in group activities, except for leaving their rooms for showers. The Director of Recreation (DOR) stated that she was instructed by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) not to interact with the JIRs or complete an activities assessment upon their admission. Instead, the JIRs were provided with a basket of puzzles and cards, but were not allowed to attend any activities outside their rooms. Further interviews with the Unit Manager and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed that the JIRs remained in their rooms at all times and did not participate in group activities. The facility's policy on activity programs, which was revised in February 2024, stated that activities should encourage maximum individual participation and be geared to the individual resident's needs. However, this policy was not followed for the JIRs, as evidenced by the lack of recreation screens, notes, or care plans for the residents, despite physician orders for recreation as tolerated.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,579 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 25 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Newark
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Community Extended Care Facility | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Broadway House For Continuing Care | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| New Vista Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Grove Park Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 1 |
| Complete Care At Orange Park | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Sinai Post-acute Nursing & Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.