Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Jersey Shore Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia was subjected to inappropriate sexual contact by another resident with intact cognition and a history of verbal abuse. The incident occurred in the dining room and was witnessed by staff, who intervened. The facility failed to identify risk factors and prevent the incident, increasing the risk of abuse.
A facility failed to document an abuse investigation after an incident where a resident with dementia was inappropriately touched by another resident with intact cognition. Although the facility reported the incident and claimed to have conducted interviews, no documentation of these interviews was found, increasing the risk of unaddressed similar incidents or negative impacts on residents' well-being.
Two residents with complex medical needs experienced significant delays in care, including long wait times for call light responses and missed or late personal hygiene assistance, due to insufficient CNA staffing on night shifts. Staff interviews and assignment records confirmed that CNAs were responsible for up to 25 residents each, with LPNs unable to assist due to other duties, leading to unmet resident needs and noncompliance with the facility's own staffing policy.
Two residents reported concerns about care and staffing, including delayed call light responses, infrequent showers, and inadequate management of a urine collection bag. These grievances were communicated to facility staff but were not documented on grievance forms or logged, and no written resolutions were provided. The facility's grievance policy was not fully implemented, and required postings were incomplete.
A resident who required staff assistance for ADLs did not receive scheduled showers as outlined in their care plan and facility policy. Despite being cognitively intact and expressing a preference for morning showers, the resident often received showers late in the evening, leading to refusals. Staff did not consistently reschedule missed showers or report refusals, and documentation was lacking, resulting in inadequate support for the resident's personal hygiene needs.
Failure to Prevent Sexual Abuse Between Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse, as evidenced by an incident involving inappropriate sexual contact between two residents. Resident 89, who was admitted with a diagnosis of dementia and had severely impaired cognition, was involved in an incident where another resident, Resident 174, was observed with his hand between Resident 89's thighs in the dining room. Resident 174, who had intact cognition and a history of verbally abusive behavior, was seen by an activities staff member engaging in this inappropriate behavior, which was identified as non-consensual sexual contact. The facility's investigation revealed that the incident occurred in the dining room, and staff intervened by separating the two residents. Despite Resident 174's history of aggressiveness towards staff, there were no prior instances of similar behavior towards other residents. The facility's policy on abuse prohibition, which includes identifying and intervening in situations where abuse is more likely to occur, was not effectively implemented to prevent this incident. The failure to identify risk factors and intervene appropriately increased the risk of abuse for Resident 89 and potentially other residents.
Failure to Document Abuse Investigation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document an abuse investigation regarding an incident of inappropriate touching involving two residents. Resident 89, who has a diagnosis of dementia and severely impaired cognition, was observed in the dining room with Resident 174's hand between their thighs. Resident 174, who has intact cognition and a history of verbally abusive behavior, was moved to another unit following the incident. The facility reported the incident to the state agency and local police and claimed to have conducted a thorough investigation, including interviews with both residents and others on the unit. However, the investigation file lacked documentation of these interviews, and the facility was unable to produce any records of them when requested. This deficiency in documentation increased the risk that other residents might have experienced similar incidents or that the incident negatively impacted their sense of well-being. The absence of documented interviews with the involved residents and others on the unit was a significant oversight in the facility's investigation process.
Inadequate Staffing Resulting in Delayed Resident Care and Unmet Hygiene Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to meet the needs of all residents, as evidenced by multiple resident complaints and staff interviews. One resident, admitted with significant mobility and neurological issues, reported that call lights were frequently unanswered during the night, making it difficult to sleep and resulting in his/her urine collection bag not being emptied regularly, sometimes leading to it bursting. This resident also experienced delays in receiving scheduled showers, often being offered showers late in the evening, which led to refusals and personal hygiene concerns. The resident expressed embarrassment due to urine odor and reported these issues to both the Social Services Assistant and the administrator. Another resident, with a history of diabetes, depression, and hypertension, described an incident where he/she vomited and waited 50 minutes for assistance after activating the call light at night. This resident rarely used the call light and was surprised by the slow response. The resident discussed these staffing concerns with the administrator, who stated that staffing met state regulations. Staffing records and interviews confirmed that on the night shift, CNAs were assigned to care for up to 25 residents each, with LPNs unable to assist due to medication and paperwork responsibilities. Staff reported that residents sometimes waited up to an hour for care, especially when one CNA was on break or assisting another resident. The facility's own policy requires appropriate staffing to ensure resident needs are met, but the observed staffing levels and staff accounts indicated that this standard was not consistently achieved.
Failure to Document and Resolve Resident Grievances Regarding Care and Staffing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document and resolve grievances related to care and staffing for two residents. One resident reported ongoing issues with understaffing, frequent unanswered call lights at night, infrequent showers, and inadequate care for a urine collection bag, which had burst on occasion. This resident stated that these concerns were communicated to the Social Services Assistant (SSA), who promised a written response, but no grievance form was completed and no documented resolution was provided. The SSA acknowledged that the concerns were not transposed onto a grievance form and instead were communicated via email to the Assistant Director of Nursing and the Administrator, with no follow-up action documented. Another resident described an incident where, after vomiting due to a virus, it took 50 minutes for staff to respond to a call light at night. This resident rarely used the call light and was surprised by the delayed response. The resident reported these concerns about staffing and call light response to the Administrator, who confirmed the conversation but did not ensure that a grievance form was completed or that the concern was documented in the grievance log. The facility's grievance log for the relevant period did not contain any entries related to these care or staffing concerns. A review of the facility's grievance policy revealed requirements for documenting and investigating all grievances, providing written decisions, and posting grievance procedures in prominent locations. However, the only posting was found in the lobby, lacking required information such as a defined time frame for grievance resolution and contact information for independent agencies. The Administrator confirmed these deficiencies in the posting and the lack of documentation and follow-up for the grievances raised by the two residents.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers and Honor Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide scheduled showers for a resident who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). According to the facility's policy, residents are to receive care and services consistent with their needs and choices, including hygiene and bathing. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses such as mononeuropathy, spinal cord compression, and muscle weakness, required partial to moderate assistance with bathing and was cognitively intact. The care plan indicated the resident's preference for choosing shower times, and the master shower schedule showed showers were to be provided twice weekly. However, documentation revealed that the resident received only four out of nine scheduled showers in one month and four out of seven in the following month. Interviews with staff and the resident confirmed that showers were often provided late in the evening, leading to refusals by the resident, who preferred morning showers and had communicated this preference to staff. The CNAs did not consistently attempt to reschedule missed showers or report refusals to the charge nurse. The lack of proper documentation and failure to accommodate the resident's preferences resulted in inadequate assistance with personal hygiene, as evidenced by the resident's own reports of feeling embarrassed due to urine odor and choosing to isolate from others.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 452 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 18 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Eatontown
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shore Pointe Care Center | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 1 |
| Complete Care At Monmouth, Llc | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Imperial Care Center | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| King Manor Care And Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Continuing Care At Seabrook | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Jersey Shore Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.