Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Atrium Post Acute Care Of Wayneview during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with schizophrenia and mild intellectual disabilities had their in-room phone removed due to a history of non-emergency 911 calls, with staff allowing phone use only at the nurse's station. The care plan was not updated to reflect this change or to document alternative arrangements for private communication, and staff could not explain how privacy was maintained, contrary to facility policy requiring private telephone access.
The facility failed to provide residents with transfer notices that included appeal rights information. Four residents were transferred to the hospital for various medical conditions without receiving proper documentation on how to appeal the transfer. The facility's policy requires such information, but it was not included in the notices, as confirmed by the Regional Nurse.
The facility failed to provide written bed hold notices to residents or their representatives during emergent hospital transfers. Four residents were transferred for medical emergencies, such as respiratory failure and acute renal failure, without receiving the required notices. The facility's policy requires these notices within 24 hours of an emergency transfer, but records lacked documentation of compliance.
A facility failed to revise a resident's care plan quarterly, as required. The resident, with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes and depression, was not invited to care conferences after January 2024, despite expressing a desire to participate. The DSS, responsible for scheduling, started in July 2024, and the MDSC followed the MDS schedule for conferences. The DON stressed the importance of these meetings for updating residents on their medical status.
Failure to Provide Private Telephone Access for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide reasonable access to a telephone with privacy for a resident diagnosed with schizophrenia and mild intellectual disabilities, who had a moderate cognitive impairment as indicated by a BIMS score of 12 out of 15. The resident's phone was removed from their room after a history of calling 911 for non-emergency situations, a decision reportedly agreed upon by the resident's representative. However, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the removal of the phone or to document any substitute arrangements for private communication. Observations confirmed that the resident did not have a phone in their room, and staff interviews revealed that the resident was only allowed to use the phone at the nurse's station. Facility staff, including the unit manager and DON, acknowledged that the care plan was not revised to address the change and could not explain how privacy was ensured when the resident used the nurse's station phone. The facility's own policy requires access to a telephone and the ability to communicate with privacy, which was not met in this instance.
Failure to Provide Appeal Rights in Transfer Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with written transfer or discharge notices that included the option to appeal the transfer or discharge. This deficiency was identified for four residents who were transferred to the hospital for various medical reasons. The notices issued by the facility did not contain the necessary information about the residents' appeal rights, including the contact details of the entity that receives appeal requests and instructions on how to obtain and submit an appeal form. Resident 123 was transferred to the hospital due to increased confusion, lethargy, and aggressive behavior, and was later diagnosed with delirium with dementia and acute kidney injury. Similarly, Resident 110 experienced multiple hospital transfers for respiratory failure and congestive heart failure, but the notices provided to them also lacked the required appeal information. Resident 50 was sent to the emergency room for low blood pressure and other symptoms, and Resident 57 was transferred due to abnormal blood work, both without receiving proper appeal rights information in their transfer notices. The facility's policy on transfer or discharge notice, revised in March 2021, mandates that residents and their representatives be given a notice that includes an explanation of their right to appeal. However, the review of the facility's issued documents revealed that this policy was not followed, as the notices did not include the necessary details for residents to understand and exercise their appeal rights. This oversight was confirmed by the Regional Nurse during the review of the notices.
Failure to Provide Bed Hold Notices During Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written bed hold notices to residents or their representatives during facility-initiated emergent hospital transfers. This deficiency was identified for four residents who were transferred to the hospital for various medical emergencies, including increased confusion, lethargy, respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, and acute renal failure. The electronic medical records for these residents were reviewed and found to be silent regarding the issuance of bed hold notices at the time of their transfers. The facility's policy, revised in March 2022, mandates that all residents or their representatives receive written information about the facility's bed-hold policies during periods of absence, such as hospitalization or therapeutic leave, within 24 hours of an emergency transfer. However, the records for the residents in question did not contain any documentation of such notices being provided. This oversight was confirmed by the Regional Nurse during a review of the discharges and transfers.
Failure to Revise Care Plan Quarterly for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan quarterly for a resident, identified as R103, who was reviewed for care plan revision. The facility did not schedule quarterly care conferences or invite R103 to the scheduled care conferences, which is a requirement according to the facility's policy. The policy states that residents, their families, and/or legal representatives should be encouraged to participate in the development and revisions of the care plan. R103, who has medical diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, depression, and muscle weakness, expressed during an interview that she was unaware of any care conferences and had never been invited, although she wished to participate. The review of R103's records showed that she attended care conferences in October 2023 and January 2024, but there was no documentation of her attendance at any care conferences after January 2024. Interviews with the Director of Social Services (DSS) and the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) revealed that the DSS, who started working at the facility in July 2024, was responsible for scheduling care conferences and inviting residents. The MDSC stated that care conferences were scheduled quarterly following the MDS schedule, and the Director of Nursing emphasized the importance of these conferences for updating residents on their medical status.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,302 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 20 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Wayne
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Careone At Wayne | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Atrium Post Acute Care Of Wayne | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Lincoln Park Care Center | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 44 | 1 |
| Lincoln Park Renaissance | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Atrium Post Acute Care Of Wayneview.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.