Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Eventide Jamestown during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents. One resident with mild intellectual disabilities was not coded correctly in item A1500 on the annual MDS, despite previous assessments indicating a positive response. Another resident experienced a weight gain of 20% over 180 days, but this was not documented as a weight gain of greater than 10% on the quarterly MDS. These inaccuracies could affect the assessment and monitoring of the residents' conditions and needs.
Two residents experienced inadequate supervision and improper use of assistive devices. One resident was transferred using a sit-to-stand lift without removing heel boots or applying the support strap, resulting in a semi-seated position with harness straps causing potential discomfort. The same resident was also left unattended in a wheelchair with the call light out of reach. Another resident with a history of falls and a tibia fracture had the call light placed out of reach multiple times, despite the care plan's emphasis on its accessibility. These actions compromised resident safety.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Intellectual Disabilities and Weight Gain
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two sampled residents, Resident #2 and Resident #75. For Resident #2, who had mild intellectual disabilities, staff did not code item A1500 as yes on the annual MDS, despite previous MDS assessments indicating a positive response. This oversight led to inaccurate representation of the resident's condition and needs in the assessment process. In the case of Resident #75, the facility did not code for a weight gain of greater than 10% on the quarterly MDS, despite the resident experiencing a weight gain of 20% over the last 180 days. This failure to accurately document the weight gain on the MDS raises concerns about the facility's ability to monitor and address changes in the resident's nutritional status effectively.
Deficiency in Resident Supervision and Assistive Device Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices for two sampled residents, #29 and #43, leading to a deficiency in ensuring resident safety. For Resident #29, observations revealed that during a transfer using a sit-to-stand lift, the certified nurse aide did not follow proper procedures by leaving the resident's heel boots on and failing to apply the support strap around the legs. This resulted in the resident being in a semi-seated position with the harness straps pulling upward into the armpits, potentially causing discomfort and safety risks. Additionally, Resident #29 was left unattended in a wheelchair with the call light out of reach for a significant period, indicating a lack of adequate supervision. In the case of Resident #43, who had a history of falls and a left tibia fracture, observations showed instances where the call light was placed out of reach, despite the care plan emphasizing the importance of ensuring it was within reach at all times. The resident was observed calling out for assistance with the call light placed on the opposite end of the room and on the dresser, indicating a failure to provide necessary assistive devices and supervision to meet the resident's needs promptly. These lapses in supervision and assistive device provision put both residents at risk for potential injury and compromised their safety within the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 5 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Jamestown
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smp Health - Ave Maria | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Smp Health - St Raphael | 32.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Eventide Jamestown.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.