Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Swift Creek Health Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not submit required PBJ staffing data to CMS for two quarters after discontinuing a software used to collect payroll information, following a reduction in bed count. The administrator was unaware that stopping the software would prevent corporate from submitting the necessary data, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with dementia and significant mobility limitations was provided with bilateral grab bars on her bed without documented evidence of attempted alternatives, a risk assessment, or informed consent. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that the required Device/Bedrail assessment and consent were not completed or present in the medical record, despite facility policy requiring these steps prior to bedrail use.
A resident with dementia experienced a privacy breach when a private sitter and a responsible party for another resident took unauthorized photographs of the resident after a fall. The facility's policy prohibits such actions, and the incident was not reported by the sitter, leading to a failure in protecting the resident's privacy.
Failure to Submit PBJ Staffing Data Due to Software Discontinuation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit required Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for two consecutive quarters: the 4th quarter of fiscal year 2024 and the 1st quarter of fiscal year 2025. This deficiency was identified through a review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER Report 1705D), which showed no data submission for the specified periods. During an interview, the administrator explained that after reducing the facility's bed count from 28 to 3, they reevaluated and discontinued the use of a specific software that was responsible for collecting payroll data and facilitating PBJ submissions. The administrator was unaware that discontinuing this software would prevent corporate from submitting the required PBJ data, resulting in the omission for those two quarters.
Failure to Complete Bedrail Assessment and Obtain Consent Prior to Grab Bar Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that alternatives were attempted, a risk assessment was conducted, and informed consent was obtained prior to the use of bilateral grab bars on the bed for a resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment. The resident, who had functional limitations in her upper and lower extremities and required substantial assistance with bed mobility and transfers, was observed to have grab bars installed on both sides of her bed. The care plan noted the use of grab bars to maintain independence with bed mobility and acknowledged the increased risk for complications, but there was no documentation in the medical record of attempted alternatives, a Device/Bedrail assessment, or informed consent for the use of the grab bars. Interviews with facility staff, including the current and previous DONs, confirmed that the required assessments and consents were not completed or documented for this resident. The DON stated that the facility's process required a risk assessment and informed consent prior to the use of grab bars, and that these should be documented in the resident's record. However, upon review, neither the assessment nor the consent could be found. Staff interviews further confirmed that the grab bars had been in use for an extended period without the necessary documentation or reassessment.
Breach of Resident Privacy Due to Unauthorized Photography
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the privacy of a resident, identified as Resident #2, who was admitted with a diagnosis of dementia and a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. On the day of the incident, Resident #2 was found lying on the floor after a fall, and a private sitter, NA #1, hired by the family of another resident, witnessed the event. During this time, the responsible party for the other resident, RP #1, took photographs of Resident #2 on the floor and of the name label on her door, intending to report the incident. NA #1 did not report the photograph-taking to the facility staff, possibly due to concerns about her employment status as a private sitter. The facility's policy prohibits staff from taking photographs of residents, and the Director of Nursing emphasized that any unauthorized photography should be reported immediately. The Administrator was unaware of the photographs taken by RP #1 until the interview and acknowledged that the facility's policy was not followed. The power of attorney for Resident #2 expressed that Resident #2 would have been upset by the invasion of privacy, as she was a private person and had previously declined permission for photographs to be used for promotional purposes. The incident highlights a breach of privacy and confidentiality for Resident #2, as the facility failed to ensure that unauthorized photographs were not taken and reported.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 181 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cary
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenaire | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Highfield Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
| Unc Rex Rehab & Nursing Care Center Of Apex | 4.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Pruitthealth-raleigh | 6.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Rex Rehab & Nursing Care Center | 6.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Swift Creek Health Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.